80 FR 75442 - Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 231 (December 2, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 231 (December 2, 2015)
| Page Range | 75442-75444 | |
| FR Document | 2015-30542 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 231 (Wednesday, December 2, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 75442-75444] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-30542] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0751; FRL-9939-64-Region 9] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns volatile organic compound (VOC), oxides of nitrogen (NOX ), and particulate matter (PM) emissions from internal combustion engines. We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Any comments must arrive by January 4, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number [EPA-R09-OAR- 2015-0751, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on- line instructions. 2. Email: [email protected]. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901. Instructions: Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. If you need to include CBI as part of your comment, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html for further instructions. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. For the full EPA public comment policy and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. [[Page 75443]] Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947- 4126, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and ``our'' refer to EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of this rule? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions? II. EPA's Evaluation and Proposed Action A. How is EPA evaluating the rule? B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? C. EPA recommendations to further improve the rule D. Public comment and proposed action III. Incorporation by reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the dates that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 1--Submitted Rule ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule number Rule title Adopted Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SJVUAPCD.............................. 4702 Internal Combustion 11/14/13 05/13/14 Engines. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On July 18, 2014, EPA determined that the submittal for SJVUAPCD Rule 4702 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of this rule? We approved an earlier version of Rule 4702 into the SIP on January 10, 2008 (73 FR 1819). The SJVUAPCD adopted revisions to the SIP- approved version on November 14, 2013 and CARB submitted them to us on May 13, 2014. While we can act on only the most recently submitted version, we have reviewed materials provided with previous submittals. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions? VOCs and NOX help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human health and the environment. PM contributes to effects that are harmful to human health and the environment, including premature mortality, aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular disease, decreased lung function, visibility impairment, and damage to vegetation and ecosystems. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control emissions of VOC, NOX , and PM, among other pollutants. The primary changes to Rule 4702 include expanding the applicability of the rule, establishing lower NOX limits for spark-ignited non-Agricultural Operation (non-AO) IC engines, and adding a fee compliance option. EPA's technical support document (TSD) contains more information about this rule. II. EPA's Evaluation and Proposed Action A. How is EPA evaluating the rule? Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate pollution control requirements, rule enforceability, and SIP revisions under CAA section 110 include the following: 1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). 2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990). 3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 4. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOX Supplement), 57 FR 55620, November 25, 1992. 5. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NOX Emissions from Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines,'' EPA-453/R-93-032, July 1993. 6. ``Determination of Reasonable Available Control Technology and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Stationary Spark- Ignited Internal Combustion Engines,'' CARB, November 2011. 7. ``Review of State Implementation Plans and Revisions for Enforceability and Legal Sufficiency,'' September 23, 1987. In ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above, all major stationary sources of NOX or VOCs must be subject to Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) (see sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f)). The SJVUAPCD regulates an ozone nonattainment area classified as extreme nonattainment for the 1-hour, 1997 8-hour, and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (see 40 CFR 81.305). Additionally, moderate PM2.5 nonattainment areas must implement Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM), including Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) (see CAA sections 172(c)(1) and 189(a)(1)(C)), and serious PM2.5 nonattainment areas must implement Best Available Control Measures (BACM), including Best Available Control Technology (BACT) (see CAA section 189(b)(1)(B)). The SJVUAPCD regulates a PM2.5 nonattainment area classified as serious nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and moderate nonattainment for the 2006 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. Therefore, we are evaluating this rule for compliance with both RACT and BACT requirements for NOX control. B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? We believe this rule is consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, BACT, and SIP revisions. Although the new NOX emission limits for spark-ignited IC engines used in non-agricultural [[Page 75444]] operations in Table 2 of the revised rule are not enforceable because of the option to pay fees in lieu of compliance with the limits (section 5.2.2.2), the rule clearly requires that all engines in the fee program comply with the applicable limits in Table 1 of the rule (section 5.2.2.2.1), which are identical to the control requirements in the SIP-approved version of Rule 4702. Based on our evaluation of the control requirements in the rule and related support documents in the SIP submission, we propose to determine that Rule 4702 implements BACT for NOX emissions from stationary internal combustion engines operating in the SJV. The TSD has more information on our evaluation. C. EPA Recommendations to Further Improve the Rule The TSD describes additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time SJVUAPCD modifies the rule but are not currently the basis for rule disapproval. D. Public Comment and Proposed Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is proposing to fully approve the submitted rule based on our conclusion that the rule satisfies all applicable CAA requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until January 4, 2016. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the SJVUAPCD rule as described in Table 1 of this notice. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed action does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule will not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: November 12, 2015. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2015-30542 Filed 12-1-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![75442 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 231 / Wednesday, December 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Management User Guide—V. 1.8, July (b) Military Export Sales—Exports ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
23, 2012, Section 3.4, page 92, available that are either Foreign Military Sales AGENCY
at https://www.sam.gov/sam/transcript/ (FMS) or commercial (direct) sales of:
SAM_User_Guide_v1.8.pdf). In addition, 40 CFR Part 52
(1) Defense articles and/or defense
the U.S. government takes steps to [EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0751; FRL–9939–64–
services as defined by the Arms Export
facilitate selection of the correct NAICS Region 9]
Control Act and International Traffic in
code by private parties. The U.S. Census
Bureau posts instructions on its Web Arms Regulations; or
Revisions to the California State
site on how to properly classify (2) Items controlled under an Export Implementation Plan, San Joaquin
products and services in accordance Control Classification Number (ECCN) Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
with the NAICS. BIS has included that has the numeral ‘‘6’’ as its third District
illustrative examples in § 701.4(c)(1)(iii) character in the Commerce Control List
and § 701.4(c)(2)(iv) on classifying AGENCY: Environmental Protection
found in Supplement No. 1 to part 774
military export sales and offset Agency (EPA).
of this chapter other than semi-
transactions by NAICS codes. ACTION: Proposed rule.
submersible and submersible vessels
In addition, small governmental specially designed for cargo transport SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
entities and small organizations are not and parts, components, accessories and Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
likely to be involved in international attachments specially designed therefor revision to the San Joaquin Valley
defense trade, and would therefore have controlled under ECCN 8A620.b; test, Unified Air Pollution Control District
no reason to submit data to BIS inspection and production equipment (SJVUAPCD) portion of the California
pursuant to this regulation. controlled in ECCN 8B620.b; software State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
Consequently, this proposed rule, if revision concerns volatile organic
controlled in ECCN 8D620.b; and
promulgated, will not have a significant compound (VOC), oxides of nitrogen
technology controlled in ECCN 8E620.b.
impact on a substantial number of small (NOX), and particulate matter (PM)
entities. * * * * *
emissions from internal combustion
■ 3. Revise paragraph (a) of § 701.3 to engines. We are proposing to approve a
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 701
read as follows: local rule to regulate these emission
Administrative practice and
procedure, Arms and munitions, § 701.3 Applicability and scope.
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
Business and industry, Exports, or the Act). We are taking comments on
Government contracts, Reporting and (a) This part applies to U.S. firms this proposal and plan to follow with a
recordkeeping requirements. entering contracts that are subject to an final action.
offset agreement exceeding $5,000,000 DATES: Any comments must arrive by
Accordingly, 15 CFR part 701 is
proposed to be amended as follows: in value and that are for the sale to a January 4, 2016.
foreign country or foreign firm of: (1) ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
PART 701—[AMENDED] Defense articles and/or defense services identified by docket number [EPA–R09–
as defined by the Arms Export Control OAR–2015–0751, by one of the
■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR Act and International Traffic in Arms following methods:
part 701 is revised to read as follows: Regulations; or 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2061 et. seq., (2) Items controlled under an Export www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
E.O. 13603, 77 FR 16651, 3 CFR, 2012 Comp., instructions.
p. 225.
Control Classification Number (ECCN) 2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
that has the numeral ‘‘6’’ as its third 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
■ 2. Revise paragraphs (a) and (b) of character in the Commerce Control List
§ 701.2 to read as follows: (Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection
found in Supplement No. 1 to part 774 Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
§ 701.2 Definitions. of this chapter other than semi- San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
(a) Offsets—Compensation practices submersible and submersible vessels Instructions: Once submitted,
required as a condition of purchase in specially designed for cargo transport comments cannot be edited or
either government-to-government or and parts, components, accessories and withdrawn. The EPA may publish any
commercial sales of: attachments specially designed therefor comment received to its public docket.
(1) Defense articles and/or defense controlled under ECCN 8A620.b; test, Do not submit electronically any
services as defined by the Arms Export inspection and production equipment information you consider to be
Control Act and the International Traffic controlled in ECCN 8B620.b; software Confidential Business Information (CBI)
in Arms Regulations; or controlled in ECCN 8D620.b and or other information whose disclosure is
(2) Items controlled under an Export technology controlled in ECCN 8E620.b. restricted by statute. If you need to
Control Classification Number (ECCN) include CBI as part of your comment,
* * * * *
that has the numeral ‘‘6’’ as its third please visit http://www.epa.gov/
character in the Commerce Control List Dated: November 24, 2015. dockets/comments.html for further
found in Supplement No. 1 to part 774 Kevin J. Wolf, instructions. Multimedia submissions
of this chapter other than semi- Assistant Secretary for Export (audio, video, etc.) must be
submersible and submersible vessels accompanied by a written comment.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Administration.
specially designed for cargo transport [FR Doc. 2015–30421 Filed 12–1–15; 8:45 am] The written comment is considered the
and parts, components, accessories and official comment and should include
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
attachments specially designed therefor discussion of all points you wish to
controlled under ECCN 8A620.b; test, make. For the full EPA public comment
inspection and production equipment policy and general guidance on making
controlled in ECCN 8B620.b, software effective comments, please visit http://
controlled in ECCN 8D620.b and www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-
technology controlled in ECCN 8E620.b. epa-dockets.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:22 Dec 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM 02DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_75673/page/1.svg)
![75444 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 231 / Wednesday, December 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
operations in Table 2 of the revised rule beyond those imposed by State law. For Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
are not enforceable because of the that reason, this proposed action: Dated: November 12, 2015.
option to pay fees in lieu of compliance • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
Jared Blumenfeld,
with the limits (section 5.2.2.2), the rule action’’ subject to review by the Office
clearly requires that all engines in the of Management and Budget under Regional Administrator, Region IX.
fee program comply with the applicable Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, [FR Doc. 2015–30542 Filed 12–1–15; 8:45 am]
limits in Table 1 of the rule (section October 4, 1993); BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
5.2.2.2.1), which are identical to the • does not impose an information
control requirements in the SIP- collection burden under the provisions
approved version of Rule 4702. Based of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
on our evaluation of the control U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); AGENCY
requirements in the rule and related • is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a 40 CFR Part 52
support documents in the SIP
submission, we propose to determine substantial number of small entities [EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0613; FRL–9939–46–
that Rule 4702 implements BACT for under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Region 6]
NOX emissions from stationary internal U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
combustion engines operating in the • does not contain any unfunded Approval and Promulgation of
SJV. The TSD has more information on mandate or significantly or uniquely Implementation Plans; State of New
our evaluation. affect small governments, as described Mexico/Albuquerque-Bernalillo
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act County; Infrastructure and Interstate
C. EPA Recommendations to Further of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Transport SIP 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide
Improve the Rule • does not have Federalism National Ambient Air Quality
The TSD describes additional rule implications as specified in Executive Standards
revisions that we recommend for the Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, AGENCY: Environmental Protection
next time SJVUAPCD modifies the rule 1999); Agency (EPA).
but are not currently the basis for rule • is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or ACTION: Proposed rule.
disapproval.
safety risks subject to Executive Order SUMMARY: Under the Federal Clean Air
D. Public Comment and Proposed 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
Action Act (CAA or the Act), the
• is not a significant regulatory action Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR is proposing to approve a State
the Act, EPA is proposing to fully 28355, May 22, 2001); Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
approve the submitted rule based on our • is not subject to requirements of from the State of New Mexico on behalf
conclusion that the rule satisfies all Section 12(d) of the National of the City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo
applicable CAA requirements. We will Technology Transfer and Advancement County for the Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
accept comments from the public on Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because National Ambient Air Quality Standards
this proposal until January 4, 2016. application of those requirements would (NAAQS). The submittal addresses how
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; the existing SIP provides for
III. Incorporation by Reference and implementation, maintenance, and
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to • does not provide EPA with the
enforcement of the 2010 NO2 NAAQS
include in a final EPA rule regulatory discretionary authority to address
(infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP
text that includes incorporation by disproportionate human health or
ensures that the State’s SIP for
reference. In accordance with environmental effects with practical,
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County is
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is appropriate, and legally permissible
adequate to meet the state’s
proposing to incorporate by reference methods under Executive Order 12898
responsibilities under the CAA,
the SJVUAPCD rule as described in (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
including the four CAA requirements
Table 1 of this notice. The EPA has In addition, this proposed action does
for interstate transport of NO2
made, and will continue to make, these not have tribal implications as specified
emissions.
documents available electronically by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
through www.regulations.gov and in November 9, 2000), because the SIP is DATES: Written comments must be
hard copy at the appropriate EPA office not approved to apply on any Indian received on or before January 4, 2016.
(see the ADDRESSES section of this reservation land or in any other area ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
preamble for more information). where EPA or an Indian tribe has identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
demonstrated that a tribe has R06–OAR–2013–0613, by one of the
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian following methods:
Reviews • www.regulations.gov. Follow the
country, the rule will not have tribal
Under the Clean Air Act, the implications and will not impose online instructions.
Administrator is required to approve a substantial direct costs on tribal • Email: Tracie Donaldson at
SIP submission that complies with the governments or preempt tribal law. Donaldson.tracie@epa.gov.
provisions of the Act and applicable • Mail or delivery: Mary Stanton,
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Chief, State Implementation B Section
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP Environmental protection, Air (6MM–AB), Environmental Protection
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
State choices, provided that they meet Incorporation by reference, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Deliveries
the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen are accepted only between the hours of
Accordingly, this proposed action dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays, and not on
merely proposes to approve State law as Reporting and recordkeeping legal holidays. Special arrangements
meeting Federal requirements and does requirements, Volatile organic should be made for deliveries of boxed
not impose additional requirements compounds. information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:22 Dec 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM 02DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_75673/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 13:48:40
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 13:48:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Any comments must arrive by January 4, 2016. | |
| Contact | Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947- 4126, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 75442 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR