80_FR_75682 80 FR 75451 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014

80 FR 75451 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 231 (December 2, 2015)

Page Range75451-75452
FR Document2015-30339

On July 29, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ This review covers Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya) and Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation (SMTC). We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received no comments or requests for a hearing. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that sales of subject merchandise by Nan Ya were not made at less than normal value during the period of review (POR). We continue to find that SMTC had no shipments during the POR. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 231 (Wednesday, December 2, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 231 (Wednesday, December 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75451-75452]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30339]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 231 / Wednesday, December 2, 2015 / 
Notices

[[Page 75451]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-837]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From 
Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 29, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 
and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ This 
review covers Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya) and Shinkong 
Materials Technology Corporation (SMTC). We invited interested parties 
to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received no comments or 
requests for a hearing. Therefore, for the final results, we continue 
to find that sales of subject merchandise by Nan Ya were not made at 
less than normal value during the period of review (POR). We continue 
to find that SMTC had no shipments during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From 
Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014, 80 
FR 45182 (July 29, 2015) (Preliminary Results).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: December 2, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5255.

Background

    On July 29, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results. 
The POR is July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. We invited interested 
parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received no comments 
or requests for a hearing from any party. The Department conducted this 
administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Act.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the antidumping duty order are all gauges 
of raw, pretreated, or primed PET film, whether extruded or coextruded. 
Excluded are metalized films and other finished films that have had at 
least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a 
performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 
inches thick. Imports of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and 
strip are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The 
written description of the scope of the antidumping duty order is 
dispositive.

Final Results of Review

    As noted above, the Department received no comments concerning the 
Preliminary Results. As there are no changes from, or comments upon, 
the Preliminary Results, the Department finds that there is no reason 
to modify its analysis and calculations. Thus, we continue to find that 
sales of subject merchandise by Nan Ya were not made at less than 
normal value during the POR. We continue to find that SMTC had no 
shipments during the POR. Accordingly, no decision memorandum 
accompanies this Federal Register notice. For further details of the 
issues addressed in this proceeding, see the Preliminary Results and 
the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ The final 
weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 1, 2013, through 
June 30, 2014, for Nan Ya is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination 
of No Shipments: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 
from Taiwan; 2013-2014,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 
dated July 22, 2015 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which can be 
accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted- average
                  Producer/Exporter                          margin
                                                          (percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation..........................              0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
information and information provided by SMTC and its affiliate Shinkong 
Synthetic Fibers Corporation (SSFC), we determine that SMTC had no 
shipments of the subject merchandise, and, therefore, no reviewable 
transactions, during the POR. For a full discussion of this 
determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Assessment Rates

    The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries in this review, in accordance with 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). The 
Department intends to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 
days after publication of these final results of review. Because we 
have calculated a zero margin for Nan Ya in the final results of this 
review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212 we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003 in its Assessment Policy Notice.\3\ This clarification 
applies to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced and 
exported by Nan Ya for which it did not know that the merchandise was 
destined for the United States. Furthermore, this clarification applies 
to all POR entries entered under the case number for SMTC because it 
certified that it made no POR shipments of subject merchandise for 
which it had knowledge of the U.S. destination. In such instances, 
consistent with the

[[Page 75452]]

Assessment Policy Notice, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed 
entries at the all-others rate established in the less-than fair-value 
(LTFV) investigation, 2.40 percent,\4\ if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(Assessment Policy Notice).
    \4\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from 
Taiwan, 67 FR 44174, 44175 (July 1, 2002) (PET Film from Taiwan 
Amended Final Determination), unchanged in Notice of Amended Final 
Antidumping Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 
Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 
Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR 46566 (July 15, 2002) 
(Correction Notice).
    \5\ See Assessment Policy Notice for a full discussion of this 
clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 
rate for Nan Ya will be 0.00%, the rate established in the final 
results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 
companies not covered in this review, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this or any 
previous review or in the original LTFV investigation but the 
manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) 
if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this 
or any previous review or the investigation, the cash-deposit rate will 
continue to be the all-others rate of 2.40 percent, which is the all-
others rate established by the Department in the LTFV investigation.\6\ 
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final Determination, 67 FR 
at 44175, unchanged in Correction Notice, 67 FR at 46566.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation, which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: November 20, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-30339 Filed 12-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                                                                                                                                                                 75451

                                                  Notices                                                                                                       Federal Register
                                                                                                                                                                Vol. 80, No. 231

                                                                                                                                                                Wednesday, December 2, 2015



                                                  This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER                    Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;                     average dumping margin for the period
                                                  contains documents other than rules or                  telephone: (202) 482–5255.                            July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014, for
                                                  proposed rules that are applicable to the                                                                     Nan Ya is as follows:
                                                  public. Notices of hearings and investigations,         Background
                                                  committee meetings, agency decisions and                  On July 29, 2015, the Department                                                                Weighted-
                                                  rulings, delegations of authority, filing of            published the Preliminary Results. The                      Producer/Exporter                   average margin
                                                  petitions and applications and agency                   POR is July 1, 2013, through June 30,                                                            (percentage)
                                                  statements of organization and functions are
                                                  examples of documents appearing in this
                                                                                                          2014. We invited interested parties to
                                                                                                                                                                Nan Ya Plastics Corpora-
                                                  section.                                                comment on the Preliminary Results.                     tion ................................        0.00
                                                                                                          We received no comments or requests
                                                                                                          for a hearing from any party. The
                                                                                                                                                                Final Determination of No Shipments
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  Department conducted this
                                                                                                          administrative review in accordance                     Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs
                                                  International Trade Administration                      with section 751(a)(2) of the Act.                    and Border Protection (CBP)
                                                                                                                                                                information and information provided
                                                  [A–583–837]                                             Scope of the Order                                    by SMTC and its affiliate Shinkong
                                                                                                             The products covered by the                        Synthetic Fibers Corporation (SSFC), we
                                                  Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,                        antidumping duty order are all gauges of              determine that SMTC had no shipments
                                                  Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From                        raw, pretreated, or primed PET film,                  of the subject merchandise, and,
                                                  Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping                    whether extruded or coextruded.                       therefore, no reviewable transactions,
                                                  Duty Administrative Review and Final                    Excluded are metalized films and other                during the POR. For a full discussion of
                                                  Determination of No Shipments; 2013–                    finished films that have had at least one             this determination, see the Preliminary
                                                  2014                                                    of their surfaces modified by the                     Decision Memorandum.
                                                  AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                   application of a performance-enhancing
                                                                                                                                                                Assessment Rates
                                                  International Trade Administration,                     resinous or inorganic layer of more than
                                                  Department of Commerce.                                 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of                         The Department will determine, and
                                                  SUMMARY: On July 29, 2015, the                          polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,               CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
                                                  Department of Commerce (the                             and strip are currently classifiable in the           all appropriate entries in this review, in
                                                  Department) published the preliminary                   Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the                     accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of
                                                  results of the administrative review of                 United States (HTSUS) under item                      the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). The
                                                  the antidumping duty (AD) order on                      number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS                           Department intends to issue assessment
                                                  polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,                 subheadings are provided for                          instructions directly to CBP 15 days
                                                  and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan in                     convenience and customs purposes. The                 after publication of these final results of
                                                  accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of                 written description of the scope of the               review. Because we have calculated a
                                                  the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the                 antidumping duty order is dispositive.                zero margin for Nan Ya in the final
                                                  Act).1 This review covers Nan Ya                                                                              results of this review, in accordance
                                                                                                          Final Results of Review                               with 19 CFR 351.212 we will instruct
                                                  Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya) and
                                                  Shinkong Materials Technology                              As noted above, the Department                     CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
                                                  Corporation (SMTC). We invited                          received no comments concerning the                   without regard to antidumping duties.
                                                  interested parties to comment on the                    Preliminary Results. As there are no                     The Department clarified its
                                                  Preliminary Results. We received no                     changes from, or comments upon, the                   ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
                                                  comments or requests for a hearing.                     Preliminary Results, the Department                   May 6, 2003 in its Assessment Policy
                                                  Therefore, for the final results, we                    finds that there is no reason to modify               Notice.3 This clarification applies to
                                                  continue to find that sales of subject                  its analysis and calculations. Thus, we               entries of subject merchandise during
                                                  merchandise by Nan Ya were not made                     continue to find that sales of subject                the POR produced and exported by Nan
                                                  at less than normal value during the                    merchandise by Nan Ya were not made                   Ya for which it did not know that the
                                                  period of review (POR). We continue to                  at less than normal value during the                  merchandise was destined for the
                                                  find that SMTC had no shipments                         POR. We continue to find that SMTC                    United States. Furthermore, this
                                                  during the POR.                                         had no shipments during the POR.                      clarification applies to all POR entries
                                                                                                          Accordingly, no decision memorandum                   entered under the case number for
                                                  DATES: Effective Date: December 2, 2015.
                                                                                                          accompanies this Federal Register                     SMTC because it certified that it made
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        notice. For further details of the issues             no POR shipments of subject
                                                  Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD                           addressed in this proceeding, see the                 merchandise for which it had
                                                  Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and                 Preliminary Results and the                           knowledge of the U.S. destination. In
                                                  Compliance, International Trade                         accompanying Preliminary Decision                     such instances, consistent with the
                                                  Administration, U.S. Department of
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                          Memorandum.2 The final weighted-
                                                  Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution                                                                        Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
                                                                                                            2 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary         Compliance, dated July 22, 2015 (Preliminary
                                                    1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and     Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative            Decision Memorandum), which can be accessed
                                                  Strip From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of               Review and Preliminary Determination of No            directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
                                                  Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and              Shipments: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet,    index.html.
                                                  Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2013–        and Strip from Taiwan; 2013–2014,’’ from Christian      3 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty

                                                  2014, 80 FR 45182 (July 29, 2015) (Preliminary          Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping     Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
                                                  Results).                                               and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul           FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:24 Dec 01, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00001   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM    02DEN1


                                                  75452                    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 231 / Wednesday, December 2, 2015 / Notices

                                                  Assessment Policy Notice, we will                       this requirement could result in the                  DATES:  Submit your comments on this
                                                  instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed                   Secretary’s presumption that                          proposed new system of records on or
                                                  entries at the all-others rate established              reimbursement of antidumping duties                   before January 4, 2016.
                                                  in the less-than fair-value (LTFV)                      occurred and the subsequent assessment                   The Department filed a report
                                                  investigation, 2.40 percent,4 if there is               of double antidumping duties.                         describing the new system of records
                                                  no rate for the intermediate                                                                                  covered by this notice with the Chair of
                                                  company(ies) involved in the                            Administrative Protective Order
                                                                                                                                                                the Senate Committee on Homeland
                                                  transaction.5                                             This notice also serves as a reminder               Security and Governmental Affairs, the
                                                  Cash Deposit Requirements                               to parties subject to administrative                  Chair of the House Committee on
                                                                                                          protective order (APO) of their                       Oversight and Government Reform, and
                                                     The following cash deposit                           responsibility concerning the return or               the Administrator of the Office of
                                                  requirements will be effective upon                     destruction of proprietary information                Information and Regulatory Affairs,
                                                  publication of the final results of this                disclosed under APO in accordance                     Office of Management and Budget
                                                  administrative review for all shipments                 with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which                      (OMB) on November 20, 2015. This
                                                  of the subject merchandise entered, or                  continues to govern business                          system of records will become effective
                                                  withdrawn from warehouse, for                           proprietary information in this segment               on the later date of: (1) The expiration
                                                  consumption on or after the publication                 of the proceeding. Timely written                     of the 40-day period for OMB review on
                                                  date, as provided for by section                        notification of the return/destruction of             January 2, 2016, unless OMB waives 10
                                                  751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash                   APO materials or conversion to judicial               days of the 40–day review period for
                                                  deposit rate for Nan Ya will be 0.00%,                  protective order is hereby requested.                 compelling reasons shown by the
                                                  the rate established in the final results               Failure to comply with the regulations                Department, or (2) January 4, 2016,
                                                  of this review; (2) for previously                      and terms of an APO is a violation,                   unless the system of records needs to be
                                                  reviewed or investigated companies not                  which is subject to sanction.                         changed as a result of public comment
                                                  covered in this review, the cash deposit                                                                      or OMB review. The Department will
                                                                                                            We are issuing and publishing this
                                                  rate will continue to be the company-                                                                         publish any changes to the system of
                                                                                                          notice in accordance with sections
                                                  specific rate published for the most                                                                          records or routine uses that result from
                                                                                                          751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
                                                  recent period; (3) if the exporter is not                                                                     public comment or OMB review.
                                                                                                          CFR 351.213(h).
                                                  a firm covered in this or any previous
                                                  review or in the original LTFV                            Dated: November 20, 2015.                           ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
                                                  investigation but the manufacturer is,                  Paul Piquado,                                         through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
                                                  the cash-deposit rate will be the rate                  Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
                                                                                                                                                                or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
                                                  established for the most recent period                  Compliance.                                           or hand delivery. We will not accept
                                                  for the manufacturer of the                             [FR Doc. 2015–30339 Filed 12–1–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                                comments submitted by fax or by email
                                                  merchandise; and (4) if neither the                                                                           or those submitted after the comment
                                                                                                          BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                  exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm                                                                       period. To ensure that we do not receive
                                                  covered in this or any previous review                                                                        duplicate copies, please submit your
                                                  or the investigation, the cash-deposit                                                                        comments only once. In addition, please
                                                  rate will continue to be the all-others                 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION                               include the Docket ID and the term
                                                  rate of 2.40 percent, which is the all-                                                                       ‘‘Impact Evaluation of Data-Driven
                                                  others rate established by the                          Privacy Act of 1974; System of                        Instruction Professional Development
                                                  Department in the LTFV investigation.6                  Records—Impact Evaluation of Data-                    for Teachers’’ at the top of your
                                                  These cash deposit requirements, when                   Driven Instruction Professional                       comments.
                                                  imposed, shall remain in effect until                   Development for Teachers                                 • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
                                                  further notice.                                                                                               www.regulations.gov to submit your
                                                                                                          AGENCY:  Institute of Education Sciences,             comments electronically. Information
                                                  Reimbursement of Duties                                 Department of Education.                              on using Regulations.gov, including
                                                    This notice also serves as a final                    ACTION: Notice of a new system of                     instructions for accessing agency
                                                  reminder to importers of their                          records.                                              documents, submitting comments, and
                                                  responsibility under 19 CFR                                                                                   viewing the docket, is available on the
                                                  351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate                     SUMMARY:    In accordance with the                    site under ‘‘Are you new to the site.’’
                                                  regarding the reimbursement of                          Privacy Act of 1974, as amended                          • Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
                                                  antidumping duties prior to liquidation                 (Privacy Act), the Department of                      or Hand Delivery: If you mail or deliver
                                                  of the relevant entries during this                     Education (Department) publishes this                 your comments about these proposed
                                                  review period. Failure to comply with                   notice of a new system of records                     priorities, requirements, definitions, and
                                                                                                          entitled ‘‘Impact Evaluation of Data-                 selection criterion address them to: Dr.
                                                    4 See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty        Driven Instruction Professional                       Audrey Pendleton, Associate
                                                  Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and      Development for Teachers’’ (#18–13–                   Commissioner, Evaluation Division,
                                                  Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
                                                  Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film)
                                                                                                          39). The National Center for Education                National Center for Education
                                                  from Taiwan, 67 FR 44174, 44175 (July 1, 2002)          Evaluation and Regional Assistance at                 Evaluation and Regional Assistance,
                                                  (PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final                     the Department’s Institute of Education               Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.
                                                  Determination), unchanged in Notice of Amended          Sciences (IES) awarded a contract in                  Department of Education, 555 New
                                                  Final Antidumping Duty Determination of Sales at
                                                                                                          September 2012 to Mathematica Policy                  Jersey Avenue NW., Room 502D,
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order:
                                                  Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip       Research, Abt Associates, Synergy                     Washington, DC 20208–0001.
                                                  (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR 46566 (July 15,           Enterprises, Evidence-Based Education                    Privacy Note: The Department’s
                                                  2002) (Correction Notice).                              Research & Evaluation, and Public                     policy is to make all comments received
                                                    5 See Assessment Policy Notice for a full
                                                                                                          Consulting Group Education—Focus on                   from members of the public available for
                                                  discussion of this clarification.
                                                    6 See PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final              Results to provide evidence on the                    public viewing in their entirety on the
                                                  Determination, 67 FR at 44175, unchanged in             effectiveness of data-driven instruction              Federal eRulemaking Portal at
                                                  Correction Notice, 67 FR at 46566.                      professional development.                             www.regulations.gov. Therefore,


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:24 Dec 01, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM   02DEN1



Document Created: 2015-12-14 13:48:37
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 13:48:37
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ContactJacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 5255.
FR Citation80 FR 75451 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR