80 FR 75854 - Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 233 (December 4, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 233 (December 4, 2015)
| Page Range | 75854-75856 | |
| FR Document | 2015-30715 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 233 (Friday, December 4, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 75854-75856] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-30715] [[Page 75854]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-900] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People's Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014. The Department has preliminarily determined that certain companies covered by this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: December 4, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 5760 and (202) 482-3683, respectively. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades and parts thereof. The diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under 6804.21.00. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See the Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rescission of Review in Part We are rescinding the review in part with respect to Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Id. at 2-3 for more details on this rescission in part. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Six companies that received a separate rate in previous segments of the proceeding and are subject to this review reported that they did not have any exports of subject merchandise during the POR.\3\ U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for the POR corroborated the no-shipment claims of these companies.\4\ Additionally, we requested that CBP report any contrary information.\5\ To date, CBP has not responded to our inquiry with any contrary information and we have not received any evidence that these companies had any shipments of the subject merchandise sold to the United States during the POR.\6\ Consistent with the Department's assessment practice in non-market econonmy (NME) cases regarding no shipment claims, we are completing the review with respect to these companies and will issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See the no-shipment letters dated February 23, 2015, from Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd. \4\ See the CBP data attached to the letter to all interested parties dated March 20, 2015. \5\ See CBP message numbers 5261301, 5261302, 5261303, 5261304, 5261305, and 5261306 dated September 18, 2015, available at http://adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/. \6\ CBP only responds to the Department's inquiry when there are records of shipments from the company in question. See, e.g., Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon Quality Steel Flat Products From Brazil: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 65453, 65454 (October 25, 2010). \7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), and the ``Assessment Rates'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Affiliation and Single Entity Determination Based on the record evidence for these preliminary results, we find that Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Sawing Co., Ltd., are affiliated, pursuant to sections 771(33)(A) and (F) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Additionally, under 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1)-(2), we preliminarily find that these companies should be considered a single entity (collectively known as the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity).\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4-6 for more details. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rates The Department preliminarily determines that 24 respondents are eligible to receive separate rates in this review.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Id., at 7-11, for more details. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rates for Eligible Non-Selected Respondents Consistent with our practice, we assigned to eligible non-selected respondents the average of the weighted-average margins calculated for the two individually examined respondents as the separate rate for the preliminary results of this review.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRC-Wide Entity The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review.\11\ Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate is not subject to change (i.e., 82.05 percent).\12\ Aside from the no-shipments and separate rate companies discussed above, and the company for which the review is being rescinded, the Department considers all other companies for which a review was requested (which did not file a separate rate application) to be part of the PRC-wide entity.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). \12\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 2015). \13\ See Initiation Notice, 79 FR at 76957 (``All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below.''). Companies that are subject to this administrative review that are considered to be part of the PRC-wide entity are Central Iron and Steel Research Institute Group, China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group, Danyang Aurui Hardware Products Co., Ltd., Danyang Dida Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Electrolux Construction Products (Xiamen) Co., Ltd., Fujian Quanzhou Wanlong Stone Co., Ltd., Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd., Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Hua Da Superabrasive Tools Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengyu Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd., Protech Diamond Tools, Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Shuangyang Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Shanghai Deda Industry & Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang Global New Century Tools Co., Ltd., Sichuan Huili Tools Co., Task Tools & Abrasives, Wanli Tools Group, Wuxi Lianhua Superhard Material Tools Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Tea Import & Export Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Wanda Import and Export Co., Zhejiang Wanda Tools Group Corp., and Zhejiang Wanli Super-hard Materials Co., Ltd. Addtionally, to the extent certain merchandise from the ATM Single Entity (i.e., Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd., AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Products Co., Cliff International Ltd., and HXF Saw Co., Ltd.) remains subject to the order, the ATM Single Entity is also considered to be part of the PRC-wide entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3, 10, and 12, n. 58, for more details on our treatment of the ATM Single Entity; Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's Republic of China and Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Implementation of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 18958 (March 28, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 75855]] Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Export price and constructed export price were calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a NME within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, normal value was calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Preliminary Results of Review The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Exporter (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.................................... 12.20 Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.................. 12.20 Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd... 12.20 Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............... 12.20 Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............ 12.20 Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd................ 12.20 Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd...... 12.20 Hong Kong Hao Xin International Group Limited........... 12.20 Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd.................... 12.20 Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity \14\...................... 57.10 Jiangsu Huachang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd........... 12.20 Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation \15\.............. 12.20 Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd................ 12.20 Orient Gain International Limited....................... 12.20 Pantos Logistics (HK) Company Limited................... 12.20 Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd................ 12.20 Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co. Ltd.................. 12.20 Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd................................ 12.20 Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.............. 12.20 Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd............. 12.20 Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd........ 0.75 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co.................... 12.20 Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd................... 12.20 Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd..................... 12.20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\16\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\17\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the case briefs are filed.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ As noted above, we preliminarily treat Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Sawing Co., Ltd., as a single entity. See the Preliminary Affiliation and Single Entity Determination section above and Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4-6 for details. \15\ Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation was previously known as Zhenjiang Inter-China Import & Export Co., Ltd., a company for which we initiated this review in Initiation Notice, 79 FR at 76958. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 78 FR 77098, 77100, n. 15 (December 20, 2013), unchanged in Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 79 FR 35723, 35724 n.7 (June 24, 2014). \16\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). \17\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). \18\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\19\ Hearing requests should contain (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be [[Page 75856]] limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department intends to issue the final results of this review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised by parties in their comments, within 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results of review, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\20\ If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Specifically, the Department will apply the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Final Modification for Reviews.\21\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \21\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). \22\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd., for which the review is rescinded, the antidumping duty shall be assessed at the rate equal to the cash deposit of the estimated antidumping duty required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). We will instruct CBP accordingly. Pursuant to the Department's assessment practice in NME cases,\23\ for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\24\ The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). \24\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: November 30, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Rescission of Review in Part Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Affiliation and Single Entity Discussion of the Methodology Non-Market Economy Country Status Separate Rates Surrogate Country Fair Value Comparisons Determination of Comparison Method Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis U.S. Price Normal Value Factor Valuations Currency Conversion Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-30715 Filed 12-3-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![75854 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rescission of Review in Part considered a single entity (collectively
We are rescinding the review in part known as the Jiangsu Fengtai Single
International Trade Administration with respect to Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Entity).8
Ltd.2 Separate Rates
[A–570–900]
Preliminary Determination of No The Department preliminarily
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof Shipments determines that 24 respondents are
From the People’s Republic of China: Six companies that received a eligible to receive separate rates in this
Preliminary Results of Antidumping separate rate in previous segments of the review.9
Duty Administrative Review; 2013– proceeding and are subject to this Separate Rates for Eligible Non-
2014 review reported that they did not have Selected Respondents
any exports of subject merchandise
Consistent with our practice, we
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, during the POR.3 U.S. Customs and
assigned to eligible non-selected
International Trade Administration, Border Protection (CBP) data for the
respondents the average of the
Department of Commerce. POR corroborated the no-shipment
weighted-average margins calculated for
claims of these companies.4
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce the two individually examined
Additionally, we requested that CBP
(the Department) is conducting an respondents as the separate rate for the
report any contrary information.5 To
administrative review of the preliminary results of this review.10
date, CBP has not responded to our
antidumping duty order on diamond inquiry with any contrary information PRC-Wide Entity
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond and we have not received any evidence
sawblades) from the People’s Republic The Department’s change in policy
that these companies had any shipments regarding conditional review of the
of China (the PRC). The period of review of the subject merchandise sold to the
(POR) is November 1, 2013, through PRC-wide entity applies to this
United States during the POR.6 administrative review.11 Under this
October 31, 2014. The Department has Consistent with the Department’s
preliminarily determined that certain policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be
assessment practice in non-market under review unless a party specifically
companies covered by this review made econonmy (NME) cases regarding no requests, or the Department self-
sales of subject merchandise at less than shipment claims, we are completing the initiates, a review of the entity. Because
normal value. Interested parties are review with respect to these companies no party requested a review of the PRC-
invited to comment on these and will issue appropriate instructions wide entity in this review, the entity is
preliminary results. to CBP based on the final results of the not under review and the entity’s rate is
DATES: Effective Date: December 4, 2015. review.7 not subject to change (i.e., 82.05
Preliminary Affiliation and Single percent).12 Aside from the no-shipments
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and separate rate companies discussed
Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/ Entity Determination
above, and the company for which the
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement Based on the record evidence for review is being rescinded, the
and Compliance, International Trade these preliminary results, we find that Department considers all other
Administration, U.S. Department of Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool companies for which a review was
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai requested (which did not file a separate
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Sawing Co., rate application) to be part of the PRC-
telephone: (202) 482–5760 and (202) Ltd., are affiliated, pursuant to sections wide entity.13
482–3683, respectively. 771(33)(A) and (F) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). 8 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4–6
Scope of the Order Additionally, under 19 CFR for more details.
The merchandise subject to the order 351.401(f)(1)-(2), we preliminarily find 9 Id., at 7–11, for more details.
10 Id.
is diamond sawblades and parts thereof. that these companies should be
11 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
The diamond sawblades subject to the 2 Id. at 2–3 for more details on this rescission in
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
order are currently classifiable under part.
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
3 See the no-shipment letters dated February 23,
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 2015, from Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
United States (HTSUS), and may also Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., 12 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
enter under 6804.21.00. While the Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd., From the People’s Republic of China; Final Results
Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
HTSUS subheadings are provided for Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and 2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 2015).
convenience and customs purposes, the Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd. 13 See Initiation Notice, 79 FR at 76957 (‘‘All
written description is dispositive. A full 4 See the CBP data attached to the letter to all
firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate
description of the scope of the order is interested parties dated March 20, 2015. rate status in the administrative reviews involving
5 See CBP message numbers 5261301, 5261302,
contained in the Preliminary Decision NME countries must complete, as appropriate,
5261303, 5261304, 5261305, and 5261306 dated either a separate rate application or certification, as
Memorandum.1 September 18, 2015, available at http:// described below.’’). Companies that are subject to
adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/. this administrative review that are considered to be
6 CBP only responds to the Department’s inquiry
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 See the Memorandum from Gary Taverman, part of the PRC-wide entity are Central Iron and
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for when there are records of shipments from the Steel Research Institute Group, China Iron and Steel
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, company in question. See, e.g., Certain Hot-Rolled Research Institute Group, Danyang Aurui Hardware
to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Flat-Rolled Carbon Quality Steel Flat Products Products Co., Ltd., Danyang Dida Diamond Tools
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, From Brazil: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Electrolux Construction
entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 65453, 65454 Products (Xiamen) Co., Ltd., Fujian Quanzhou
Results of 2013–2014 Antidumping Duty (October 25, 2010). Wanlong Stone Co., Ltd., Hebei Jikai Industrial
Administrative Review: Diamond Sawblades and 7 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Group Co., Ltd., Huachang Diamond Tools
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China’’ Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Hua Da Superabrasive
dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), and the ‘‘Assessment Tools Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengyu Tools
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Rates’’ section below. Co., Ltd., Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd., Protech
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 03, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM 04DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_76087/page/1.svg)
![75856 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Notices
limited to those raised in the respective PRC-wide rate.24 The Department Background
case briefs. The Department intends to intends to issue appropriate assessment Scope of the Order
issue the final results of this review, instructions directly to CBP 15 days Rescission of Review in Part
after publication of the final results of Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
including the results of its analysis of
Affiliation and Single Entity
issues raised by parties in their review. Discussion of the Methodology
comments, within 120 days after the Cash Deposit Requirements Non-Market Economy Country Status
publication of these preliminary results, Separate Rates
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the The following cash deposit Surrogate Country
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). requirements will be effective upon Fair Value Comparisons
publication of the final results of this Determination of Comparison Method
Assessment Rates administrative review for shipments of Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
Upon issuing the final results of the subject merchandise from the PRC U.S. Price
review, the Department will determine, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Normal Value
for consumption on or after the Factor Valuations
and CBP shall assess, antidumping
publication date, as provided by section Currency Conversion
duties on all appropriate entries covered Recommendation
by this review.20 If a respondent’s 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise exported by the companies [FR Doc. 2015–30715 Filed 12–3–15; 8:45 am]
weighted-average dumping margin is
above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) in listed above that have separate rates, the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
the final results of this review, we will cash deposit rate will be that established
calculate an importer-specific in the final results of review (except, if
the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of dumping cash deposit will be required); (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC National Oceanic and Atmospheric
calculated for the importer’s examined Administration
sales and the total entered value of those and non-PRC exporters not listed above
sales in accordance with 19 CFR that received a separate rate in a prior RIN 0648–XE333
351.212(b)(1). Specifically, the segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the Notice of Availability of a Draft
Department will apply the assessment
existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Programmatic Environmental
rate calculation method adopted in
PRC exporters of subject merchandise Assessment for Fisheries and
Final Modification for Reviews.21 Where
that have not been found to be entitled Ecosystem Research Conducted and
an importer- (or customer-) specific ad
to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate Funded by the National Marine
valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we
will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands
will instruct CBP to liquidate
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject Fisheries Science Center
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.22 merchandise which have not received
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
For Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd., for Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
be the rate applicable to the PRC
which the review is rescinded, the Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
exporter that supplied that non-PRC
antidumping duty shall be assessed at Commerce.
exporter. These deposit requirements,
the rate equal to the cash deposit of the ACTION: Notice of availability of a Draft
when imposed, shall remain in effect
estimated antidumping duty required at Programmatic Environmental
until further notice.
the time of entry, or withdrawal from Assessment; request for comments.
warehouse, for consumption, in Notification to Importers
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). SUMMARY: NMFS announces the
This notice serves as a preliminary
We will instruct CBP accordingly. availability of the ‘‘Draft Programmatic
reminder to importers of their
Pursuant to the Department’s Environmental Assessment (DPEA) for
responsibility under 19 CFR
assessment practice in NME cases,23 for Fisheries and Ecosystem Research
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
entries that were not reported in the regarding the reimbursement of Conducted and Funded by the Pacific
U.S. sales databases submitted by antidumping duties prior to liquidation Islands Fisheries Science Center
companies individually examined of the relevant entries during this POR. (PIFSC).’’ Publication of this notice
during this review, the Department will Failure to comply with this requirement begins the official public comment
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at could result in the Department’s period for this DPEA. The purpose of
the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the presumption that reimbursement of the DPEA is to evaluate, in compliance
Department determines that an exporter antidumping duties occurred and the with the National Environmental Policy
under review had no shipments of the subsequent assessment of doubled Act (NEPA), the potential direct,
subject merchandise, any suspended antidumping duties. indirect, and cumulative impacts of
entries that entered under that We are issuing and publishing these conducting and funding fisheries and
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that results in accordance with sections ecosystem research in NOAA’s Pacific
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Islands Region.
CFR 351.213. DATES: Comments and information must
20 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). be received no later than January 4,
Dated: November 30, 2015.
21 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping ADDRESSES: Comments on the DPEA
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 and Countervailing Duty Operations. should be addressed to: NOAA IRC,
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for NMFS/PIFSC/Director’s Office, 1845
Reviews). Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in Wasp Blvd., Bldg. #176, Honolulu, HI
22 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 96818. The mailbox address for
23 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Summary providing email comments is
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 pifsc.nepa@noaa.gov. NMFS is not
(October 24, 2011). 24 Id. responsible for email comments sent to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 03, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM 04DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_76087/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 13:52:29
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 13:52:29
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 5760 and (202) 482-3683, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 75854 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR