80_FR_77551 80 FR 77312 - Control Date for the Blueline Tilefish Fishery in Waters North of the Virginia/North Carolina Border

80 FR 77312 - Control Date for the Blueline Tilefish Fishery in Waters North of the Virginia/North Carolina Border

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 239 (December 14, 2015)

Page Range77312-77313
FR Document2015-31364

This document announces a control date that may limit or restrict access to the blueline tilefish fishery in Federal waters north of the Virginia/North Carolina border. This action is necessary to inform fishery participants that we are considering future action. We intend for this document to promote awareness of possible future rulemaking, and discourage speculative entry into and/or investment in the Mid-Atlantic blueline tilefish fishery.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 239 (Monday, December 14, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 239 (Monday, December 14, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77312-77313]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31364]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 151204999-5999-01]
RIN 0648-BF45


Control Date for the Blueline Tilefish Fishery in Waters North of 
the Virginia/North Carolina Border

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR); request for 
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces a control date that may limit or 
restrict access to the blueline tilefish fishery in Federal waters 
north of the Virginia/North Carolina border. This action is

[[Page 77313]]

necessary to inform fishery participants that we are considering future 
action. We intend for this document to promote awareness of possible 
future rulemaking, and discourage speculative entry into and/or 
investment in the Mid-Atlantic blueline tilefish fishery.

DATES: December 14, 2015, is established as the ``control date'' for 
the blueline tilefish fishery, and may be used as a reference date for 
future management measures related to the blueline tilefish fishery in 
Federal waters north of the Virginia/North Carolina border, consistent 
with applicable Federal laws and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council's recommendations. Written comments must be received on or 
before February 12, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by 
NOAA-NMFS-2015-0139 by any of the following methods:
    [ssquf] Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to 
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0139, click the 
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or 
attach your comments.
    [ssquf] Mail: Submit written comments to John K. Bullard, Regional 
Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic 
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope, 
``Comments on Blueline Tilefish Control Date.''
    Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above 
methods to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and 
considered. We may not consider comments sent by any other method, to 
any other address or individual, or received after the end of the 
comment period. All comments received are a part of the public record 
and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov 
without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, 
address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly 
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information, or 
otherwise sensitive or protected information. We will accept anonymous 
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Potts, Fishery Policy Analyst, 
NMFS, 978-281-9341, or Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 302-526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The fishery for blueline tilefish 
(Caulolatilus microps), also known as grey tilefish, in Federal waters 
north of the Virginia/North Carolina border has, until earlier this 
year, been unregulated, and historically had very low landings. 
Landings have increased in recent years. The fishery south of this line 
is managed by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council as part of 
the Snapper-Grouper Fishery Management Plan (FMP).
    In 2014, new restrictions on harvest in the South Atlantic led to a 
rapid, 20-fold increase in unregulated landings of blueline tilefish 
caught north of the Virginia/North Carolina border. This spike in 
landings prompted the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council to 
request that we take emergency action to prevent long-term harm to the 
stock. On June 4, 2015, we published an emergency rule (80 FR 31864) to 
temporarily restrict harvest of this species in the Mid-Atlantic. 
Subsequently, the Mid-Atlantic Council initiated an amendment to the 
Golden Tilefish FMP to establish management measures for blueline 
tilefish within its jurisdiction with the intention of having new 
management measures in place before NMFS's emergency rule authority 
would expire. This would avoid a return to an unregulated fishery.
    Due to the limited time to implement new management measures, the 
Mid-Atlantic Council is not considering a limited access program in the 
current FMP amendment under development. However, the Mid-Atlantic 
Council has expressed interest in potentially developing such a program 
in a future action. At its October 2015 meeting, the Mid-Atlantic 
Council voted to request that we publish a control date in the Federal 
Register that may be used to affect future participation in all sectors 
of the blueline tilefish fishery in Federal waters. The Council's 
discussions clarified that it is the Council's intent that this control 
date apply to all forms of fishing that have caught and landed blueline 
tilefish, including: Commercial fishing vessels; party/charter vessels 
that take recreational anglers for hire; as well as private 
recreational vessels. However, NMFS has no current information that 
could be used to distinguish private angler participation in this 
fishery before and after a control date. Therefore, such a control date 
would not provide meaningful notification or guidance to private 
recreational anglers.
    Therefore, this notification establishes December 14, 2015, as a 
control date for potential use in determining historical or traditional 
participation for the commercial and for-hire recreational sectors of 
the blueline tilefish fishery. Establishing a control date does not 
commit us or the Council to develop any particular management program 
or criteria for participation in this fishery. We may choose a 
different control date or may choose a management program that does not 
make use of such a date. We may also choose to take no further action 
to control entry or access to the blueline tilefish fishery. Any future 
action we take will be pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act, will be discussed at Council meetings, 
and will have additional Federal rulemaking, including opportunity for 
public comment.
    This notification gives the public notice that interested 
commercial and for-hire blueline tilefish fishery participants should 
locate and preserve records that substantiate and verify their 
participation in the fishery, such as: Dealer purchase slips for 
commercial fishing trips; Fishing Vessel Trip Reports for both 
commercial and party/charter vessels; or any other relevant documents. 
There is no precedent in the Greater Atlantic Region for a limited 
access program that applies to party/charter or private recreational 
vessels. In light of the novelty of this aspect of the Council's 
control date request, we encourage the public to comment on whether 
limited access for party/charter and private recreational anglers is 
needed in the blueline tilefish fishery, and, if so, what sort of 
qualification criteria might be considered by the Council. This 
notification and control date do not impose any legal obligations, 
requirements, or expectation.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 8, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-31364 Filed 12-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P



                                               77312                Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules

                                               discontinuance proceedings by a date                    address these situations; therefore, we               however, the Board must consider
                                               certain?                                                ask parties for ideas on how the                      whether a proposed rule would have a
                                                  • Should the Board require potential                 regulations could be modified to do so.               significant economic impact on a
                                               offerors to make a financial                            In particular, we ask parties to comment              substantial number of small entities.
                                               responsibility showing before requiring                 on the following:                                     ‘‘Small entities’’ include small
                                               carriers to provide financial information                  • Should the Board require that an                 businesses, not-for-profit organizations
                                               to those offerors?                                      offeror address whether there is a                    that are independently owned and
                                                  • Should the definition of financial                 commercial need for rail service as                   operated and are not dominant in their
                                               responsibility include the ability, based               demonstrated by support from shippers                 fields, and governmental jurisdictions
                                               on the price reflected in an offer of                   or receivers on the line or through other             with populations under 50,000. If
                                               financial assistance, to purchase and                   evidence of immediate and significant                 adoption of any rule likely to result
                                               operate for at least two years a line                   commercial need; whether there is                     from this ANPRM could have a
                                               being abandoned or to subsidize for one                 community support for rail service; and               significant economic impact on a small
                                               year service being abandoned or                         whether rail service is operationally                 entity within the meaning of the RFA,
                                               discontinued?                                           feasible?                                             commenters should submit as part of
                                                  • Should the Board alter the process                    • Should the Board establish criteria              their comments an explanation of how
                                               for carriers to provide required financial              and deadlines for carriers that want to               the business or organization falls within
                                               information to potential offerors, and if               file requests for exemptions from the                 the definition of a small entity, and how
                                               so, how?                                                OFA process?                                          and to what extent the commenter’s
                                                  • Should the Board require potential
                                                                                                       Identity of the Offeror                               business or organization could be
                                               offerors to make an ‘‘earnest money’’
                                                                                                                                                             affected. Following review of the
                                               payment or escrow payment, or to                          Another issue the Board has                         comments received in response to this
                                               obtain a bond? Key considerations                       encountered in OFA proceedings is                     ANPRM, if the Board promulgates a
                                               include: Whether the payment or bond                    confusion over the identity of the                    notice of proposed rulemaking regarding
                                               amount would be a fixed figure or                       potential offeror. See CSX Transp.                    this matter, it will conduct the requisite
                                               established on a case by case basis; what               Inc.—Aban. Exemption—in Allegany                      analysis under the RFA.
                                               method would be used in calculating or                  Cty., Md., AB 55 (Sub-No. 659X), slip                    It is ordered:
                                               fixing the amount; when in the process                  op. at 1 n.2 (STB served April 24, 2008)                 1. Initial comments are due by
                                               an offeror would need to make a                         (describing confusion over proper name                February 12, 2016.
                                               payment or obtain a bond; and whether                   and existence of entity that filed OFA in                2. Reply comments are due by March
                                               (and under what circumstances) a                        2005 but may not have been a legal                    14, 2016.
                                               waiver of such a requirement would be                   entity until 2007 or the correct legal                   3. This decision is effective on its date
                                               appropriate.                                            entity to receive deed for rail line). In             of service.
                                                  • Should the Board prohibit OFA                      order to avoid such confusion in future
                                               filings by individuals or entities that                                                                         By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
                                                                                                       proceedings, we ask the parties to                    Chairman Begeman, and Commissioner
                                               have abused the Board’s processes or                    comment on the following:                             Miller.
                                               engaged in other deceitful or abusive                     • Should the Board require multiple                 Kenyatta Clay,
                                               behavior before the Board, and if so,                   parties intending to submit a joint OFA
                                               what standards should the Board                                                                               Clearance Clerk.
                                                                                                       to do so through a single legal entity,
                                               establish in making a prohibition                                                                             [FR Doc. 2015–31347 Filed 12–11–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                       such as a corporation or partnership, to
                                               determination?                                          facilitate the financial responsibility               BILLING CODE 4915–01–P

                                               Continuation of Rail Service                            determination and to clarify the party
                                                                                                       acquiring the common carrier
                                                  The Board has also adjudicated cases                 obligation?                                           DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                               in which there has been controversy as                    • Should the Board require an
                                               to whether a party seeking to subsidize                 individual filing an OFA to provide his               National Oceanic and Atmospheric
                                               or acquire a line through the OFA                       or her personal address?                              Administration
                                               process is doing so based on a genuine                    • Should the Board require a private
                                               interest in and ability to preserve the                 legal entity filing an OFA to provide the             50 CFR Part 648
                                               line for rail service. See, e.g., Consol.               offeror’s exact legal name, the state                 [Docket No. 151204999–5999–01]
                                               Rail Corp.—Aban. Exemption—in                           under whose laws it is organized, and
                                               Hudson Cty., N.J., AB 167 (Sub-No.                      the address of its principal place of                 RIN 0648–BF45
                                               1190X), slip op. at 5 (STB served May                   business?
                                               17, 2010) (exempting line from OFA                        Because this is an Advanced Notice of               Control Date for the Blueline Tilefish
                                               process despite OFA filing because                      Proposed Rulemaking, the Board may                    Fishery in Waters North of the Virginia/
                                               offerors failed to show cause that there                not act on each item listed above, but                North Carolina Border
                                               was a continued need for rail service                   we seek the public’s comment on these                 AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries
                                               outweighing other concerns); Roaring                    ideas, including how they could best be               Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
                                               Fork R.R. Holding Auth.—Aban.                           implemented, if appropriate. Parties are              Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
                                               Exemption—in Garfield, Eagle, & Pitkin                  encouraged to be specific in                          Commerce.
                                               Ctys., Colo., AB 547X (STB served May                   commenting on these possible changes                  ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               21, 1999) (dismissing OFA because the                   and in presenting ideas for other                     rulemaking (ANPR); request for
                                               record did not provide ‘‘some assurance                 possible changes to the OFA process.                  comments.
                                               that shippers are likely to make use of                   The requirements of section 603 of the
                                               the line if continued service is made                   Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5                 SUMMARY:   This document announces a
                                               available, and that there is sufficient                 U.S.C. 601–612, (RFA) do not apply to                 control date that may limit or restrict
                                               traffic to enable the operator to fulfill its           this action because, at this stage, it is an          access to the blueline tilefish fishery in
                                               commitment to provide that service’’).                  ANPRM and not a ‘‘rule’’ as defined in                Federal waters north of the Virginia/
                                               The Board’s regulations do not currently                section 601 of the RFA. Under the RFA,                North Carolina border. This action is


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:50 Dec 11, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00036   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM   14DEP1


                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules                                                77313

                                               necessary to inform fishery participants                M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director,                  in this fishery before and after a control
                                               that we are considering future action.                  Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management                       date. Therefore, such a control date
                                               We intend for this document to promote                  Council, 302–526–5255.                                would not provide meaningful
                                               awareness of possible future                            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                        notification or guidance to private
                                               rulemaking, and discourage speculative                  fishery for blueline tilefish (Caulolatilus           recreational anglers.
                                               entry into and/or investment in the Mid-                microps), also known as grey tilefish, in                Therefore, this notification establishes
                                               Atlantic blueline tilefish fishery.                     Federal waters north of the Virginia/                 December 14, 2015, as a control date for
                                               DATES: December 14, 2015, is                            North Carolina border has, until earlier              potential use in determining historical
                                               established as the ‘‘control date’’ for the             this year, been unregulated, and                      or traditional participation for the
                                               blueline tilefish fishery, and may be                   historically had very low landings.                   commercial and for-hire recreational
                                               used as a reference date for future                     Landings have increased in recent years.              sectors of the blueline tilefish fishery.
                                               management measures related to the                      The fishery south of this line is                     Establishing a control date does not
                                               blueline tilefish fishery in Federal                    managed by the South Atlantic Fishery                 commit us or the Council to develop
                                               waters north of the Virginia/North                      Management Council as part of the                     any particular management program or
                                               Carolina border, consistent with                        Snapper-Grouper Fishery Management                    criteria for participation in this fishery.
                                               applicable Federal laws and the Mid-                    Plan (FMP).                                           We may choose a different control date
                                               Atlantic Fishery Management Council’s                      In 2014, new restrictions on harvest in            or may choose a management program
                                               recommendations. Written comments                       the South Atlantic led to a rapid, 20-fold            that does not make use of such a date.
                                               must be received on or before February                  increase in unregulated landings of                   We may also choose to take no further
                                               12, 2016.                                               blueline tilefish caught north of the                 action to control entry or access to the
                                               ADDRESSES: You may submit comments                      Virginia/North Carolina border. This                  blueline tilefish fishery. Any future
                                               on this document, identified by NOAA–                   spike in landings prompted the Mid-                   action we take will be pursuant to the
                                               NMFS–2015–0139 by any of the                            Atlantic Fishery Management Council to                Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
                                               following methods:                                      request that we take emergency action to              Conservation and Management Act, will
                                                  D Electronic Submission: Submit all                  prevent long-term harm to the stock. On               be discussed at Council meetings, and
                                               electronic public comments via the                      June 4, 2015, we published an                         will have additional Federal
                                               Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to                      emergency rule (80 FR 31864) to                       rulemaking, including opportunity for
                                               www.regulations.gov/                                    temporarily restrict harvest of this                  public comment.
                                               #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-                        species in the Mid-Atlantic.                             This notification gives the public
                                               0139, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,                  Subsequently, the Mid-Atlantic Council                notice that interested commercial and
                                               complete the required fields, and enter                 initiated an amendment to the Golden                  for-hire blueline tilefish fishery
                                               or attach your comments.                                Tilefish FMP to establish management                  participants should locate and preserve
                                                  D Mail: Submit written comments to                   measures for blueline tilefish within its             records that substantiate and verify their
                                               John K. Bullard, Regional                               jurisdiction with the intention of having             participation in the fishery, such as:
                                               Administrator, National Marine                          new management measures in place                      Dealer purchase slips for commercial
                                               Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic                    before NMFS’s emergency rule authority                fishing trips; Fishing Vessel Trip
                                               Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the                   would expire. This would avoid a return               Reports for both commercial and party/
                                               outside of the envelope, ‘‘Comments on                  to an unregulated fishery.                            charter vessels; or any other relevant
                                               Blueline Tilefish Control Date.’’                          Due to the limited time to implement               documents. There is no precedent in the
                                                  Instructions: Comments must be                       new management measures, the Mid-                     Greater Atlantic Region for a limited
                                               submitted by one of the above methods                   Atlantic Council is not considering a                 access program that applies to party/
                                               to ensure that the comments are                         limited access program in the current                 charter or private recreational vessels. In
                                               received, documented, and considered.                   FMP amendment under development.                      light of the novelty of this aspect of the
                                               We may not consider comments sent by                    However, the Mid-Atlantic Council has                 Council’s control date request, we
                                               any other method, to any other address                  expressed interest in potentially                     encourage the public to comment on
                                               or individual, or received after the end                developing such a program in a future                 whether limited access for party/charter
                                               of the comment period. All comments                     action. At its October 2015 meeting, the              and private recreational anglers is
                                               received are a part of the public record                Mid-Atlantic Council voted to request                 needed in the blueline tilefish fishery,
                                               and will generally be posted for public                 that we publish a control date in the                 and, if so, what sort of qualification
                                               viewing on www.regulations.gov                          Federal Register that may be used to                  criteria might be considered by the
                                               without change. All personal identifying                affect future participation in all sectors            Council. This notification and control
                                               information (e.g., name, address, etc.)                 of the blueline tilefish fishery in Federal           date do not impose any legal
                                               submitted voluntarily by the sender will                waters. The Council’s discussions                     obligations, requirements, or
                                               be publicly accessible. Do not submit                   clarified that it is the Council’s intent             expectation.
                                               confidential business information, or                   that this control date apply to all forms
                                               otherwise sensitive or protected                                                                                Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
                                                                                                       of fishing that have caught and landed
                                               information. We will accept anonymous                   blueline tilefish, including: Commercial                Dated: December 8, 2015.
                                               comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required                 fishing vessels; party/charter vessels                Samuel D. Rauch III,
                                               fields if you wish to remain                            that take recreational anglers for hire; as           Deputy Assistant Administrator for
                                               anonymous).                                             well as private recreational vessels.                 Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        However, NMFS has no current                          Fisheries Service.
                                               Douglas Potts, Fishery Policy Analyst,                  information that could be used to                     [FR Doc. 2015–31364 Filed 12–11–15; 8:45 am]
                                               NMFS, 978–281–9341, or Christopher                      distinguish private angler participation              BILLING CODE 3510–22–P




                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:50 Dec 11, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00037   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM   14DEP1



Document Created: 2015-12-14 13:47:22
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 13:47:22
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionAdvance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR); request for comments.
DatesDecember 14, 2015, is established as the ``control date'' for the blueline tilefish fishery, and may be used as a reference date for future management measures related to the blueline tilefish fishery in Federal waters north of the Virginia/North Carolina border, consistent with applicable Federal laws and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's recommendations. Written comments must be received on or before February 12, 2016.
ContactDouglas Potts, Fishery Policy Analyst, NMFS, 978-281-9341, or Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 302-526-5255.
FR Citation80 FR 77312 
RIN Number0648-BF45

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR