80 FR 77321 - Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 239 (December 14, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 239 (December 14, 2015)
| Page Range | 77321-77323 | |
| FR Document | 2015-31426 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 239 (Monday, December 14, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 77321-77323] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-31426] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is conducting the tenth administrative review (``AR'') of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (``WBF'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). The period of review (``POR'') is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: December 14, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor or Jeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0989, and (202) 482- 2769, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture, subject to certain exceptions.\1\ Imports of subject merchandise are classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.60.8081, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) (``Order''). \2\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, please see ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China,'' from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''), dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') and 19 CFR 351.213. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted with this notice. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is provided as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. PRC-Wide Entity The Department selected Shanghai Jian Pu Import & Export Co., Ltd. (``Jian Pu'') as the sole mandatory respondent.\3\ The Department preliminarily determines that Jian Pu did not establish its eligibility for a separate rate for the reasons explained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Accordingly, we are preliminarily treating Jian Pu as part of the PRC-wide entity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, six other companies for which a review was requested failed to provide separate rate applications or certifications necessary to establish their eligibility for a separate rate.\4\ The [[Page 77322]] Department preliminarily determines that these seven companies, including Shanghai Jian Pu, are part of the PRC-wide entity. The PRC- wide entity rate is 216.01 percent. For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Those six companies, other than Shanghai Jian Pu, not establishing their eligibility for a separate rate are: (1) Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai; (2) Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., Coronal Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (3) Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony House Industries Co., Ltd.; (4) Orient International Holding Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; (5) Prime Wood International Co., Ltd, Prime Best International Co., Ltd., Prime Best Factory, Liang Huang (Jiaxing) Enterprise Co., Ltd.; and (6) Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd. Although Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd. claimed to have no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, the Department found evidence that contradicted this claim. See Memorandum from Patrick O'Connor, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office IV, to Abdelali Elouaradia Director, Office IV, AD/CVD Operations, regarding the ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Analysis of No Exports, Sales, or Entries by Certain Companies,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Based on an analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') information, and comments provided by a number of companies, the Department preliminarily determines that 11 of the companies for which an AR was requested and that claimed no shipments during this POR did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR.\5\ For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\6\ Consistent with an announced refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases, the Department is not rescinding this AR, in part, but intends to complete the review with respect to the companies for which it has preliminarily found no shipments and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Those 11 companies with no shipments during the POR are: (1) Clearwise Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongguan Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3) Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (4) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (5) Golden Well International (HK) Ltd.; (6) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd.; (7) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (8) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (9) Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd.; (10) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.; and (11) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. \6\ See Memorandum from Patrick O'Connor, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office IV, to Abdelali Elouaradia Director, Office IV, AD/CVD Operations, regarding the ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Analysis of No Exports, Sales, or Entries by Certain Companies,'' dated concurrently with this notice. \7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) and the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed electronically using ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be due five days after the due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this review are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a summary of the argument not to exceed five pages, and a table of statutes, regulations, and cases cited, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice.\8\ Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will issue the final results of this AR, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs received, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results of these reviews, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\10\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For each individually examined respondent in this review whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, the Department will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\11\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.\12\ Where either a respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem dumping margin is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\13\ We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). \12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by companies individually examined during the AR, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of these reviews for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; and (2) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this [[Page 77323]] review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: December 2, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum (1) Summary (2) Background (3) Scope of the Order (4) Respondent Selection (5) DISCUSSION OF THE METHODOLOGY a. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments b. Duty Absorption c. NME Country Status d. Separate Rates (6) Conclusion [FR Doc. 2015-31426 Filed 12-11-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Notices 77321
produce concrete recommendations for in bilateral trade in the sector, if this Methodology
the U.S. and Indian governments on work is undertaken. The Department is conducting this
breaking down the barriers in the sector. Dated: December 4, 2015. review in accordance with section
Selection will also take into account the Chris Rosettie, 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
willingness of U.S. and Indian amended (‘‘the Act’’) and 19 CFR
Director, Office of Standards and Investment
regulators to become involved in this Policy, International Trade Administration. 351.213. For a full description of the
targeted work. methodology underlying our
[FR Doc. 2015–31430 Filed 12–11–15; 8:45 am]
Submissions should include: A conclusions, see the Preliminary
description of the main standards- BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
related barrier(s) affecting U.S.-India adopted with this notice. A list of topics
trade in the sector (e.g., lack of discussed in the Preliminary Decision
transparency by U.S. and/or Indian DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Memorandum is provided as Appendix
officials in developing standards and/or International Trade Administration I to this notice. The Preliminary
regulations affecting the sector; U.S. and Decision Memorandum is a public
Indian officials applying different [A–570–890]
document and is on file electronically
standards or technical regulations to via Enforcement and Compliance’s
products or services in the sector; Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
testing or other requirements that are Centralized Electronic Service System
difficult to meet; and/or requirements Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014 (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to
being applied by U.S. and/or Indian registered users at http://
officials only when products or services AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, access.trade.gov and in the Central
in the sector are imported from the International Trade Administration, Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
other’s market), including whether the Department of Commerce. Department of Commerce building. In
areas involved are subject to regulatory SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce addition, a complete version of the
discretion or have limited potential for (‘‘the Department’’) is conducting the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
adjustment due to legislated mandates; tenth administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of be accessed directly at http://
the relative estimated trade impact of the antidumping duty order on wooden enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
eliminating the standards-related bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) from the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
barriers in the sector; and data on People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). the electronic versions of the
bilateral trade in the sector for at least The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is January Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
three years to help evaluate trade trends. 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. We identical in content.
Submissions must identify private-
invite interested parties to comment on
sector leaders from the United States PRC-Wide Entity
these preliminary results.
and India that have mutually agreed to The Department selected Shanghai
coordinate and lead a cooperative DATES: Effective Date: December 14,
2015. Jian Pu Import & Export Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jian
dialogue among stakeholders in the Pu’’) as the sole mandatory respondent.3
sector from both the United States and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department preliminarily
India to develop recommendations for Patrick O’Connor or Jeffrey Pedersen, determines that Jian Pu did not establish
the U.S. and Indian governments on AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, its eligibility for a separate rate for the
breaking down standards-related Enforcement and Compliance, reasons explained in the Preliminary
barriers in their sector. Confirmation of International Trade Administration, Decision Memorandum. Accordingly,
such agreement is encouraged. No U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 we are preliminarily treating Jian Pu as
Government funding will be provided Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, part of the PRC-wide entity.
for these activities. DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0989, In addition, six other companies for
Additionally, submissions should and (202) 482–2769, respectively. which a review was requested failed to
provide information on current and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: provide separate rate applications or
previous efforts to address standards- certifications necessary to establish their
related barriers to bilateral trade in the Scope of the Order
eligibility for a separate rate.4 The
sector, including under other The product covered by the order is
government-to-government initiatives, wooden bedroom furniture, subject to Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
to help evaluate the potential for certain exceptions.1 Imports of subject Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture
liberalization of barriers identified. merchandise are classified under the from the People’s Republic of China,’’ from Gary
Submissions should also provide Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
information, if known, about the U.S. United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
and Indian government authorities, in 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations
particular regulators, whose actions 9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9042, (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’), dated
impact the sector, and who would need concurrently with this notice.
9403.50.9045, 9403.60.8081, 3 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
to be involved in implementing the 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although 4 Those six companies, other than Shanghai Jian
recommendations that the private sector the HTSUS subheadings are provided Pu, not establishing their eligibility for a separate
leads will develop under a U.S.-India for convenience and customs purposes, rate are: (1) Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai; (2)
cooperative dialogue on the subject the written product description in the Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd.,
Coronal Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (3) Hualing Furniture
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
sector. Before finalizing priority sector Order remains dispositive.2 (China) Co., Ltd., Tony House Manufacture (China)
selection, U.S. and Indian government Co., Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony House
S&CD leads will confirm that their 1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Industries Co., Ltd.; (4) Orient International Holding
respective relevant regulators support Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; (5) Prime Wood
targeted work in the sector. Additional Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the International Co., Ltd, Prime Best International Co.,
People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, Ltd., Prime Best Factory, Liang Huang (Jiaxing)
information also is welcome that would 2005) (‘‘Order’’). Enterprise Co., Ltd.; and (6) Woodworth Wooden
help USDOC and its interagency 2 For a complete description of the Scope of the Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd. Although
partners evaluate prospects for growth Order, please see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Dec 11, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM 14DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_77560/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Notices 77323
review period. Failure to comply with auxiliary aids should be directed to 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
this requirement could result in the OEEI at (202) 482–5225 no less than one amended (‘‘the Act’’).1 On October 27,
Department’s presumption that week prior to the meeting. 2015, the Department issued Post-
reimbursement of antidumping duties SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Preliminary Results 2 in this AR. The
occurred and the subsequent assessment meeting will take place from 8:30 a.m. period of review (‘‘POR’’) for the AR is
of double antidumping duties. to 3:30 p.m. EST. The general meeting May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014.
We are issuing and publishing these is open to the public and time will be The review covers three companies,
results in accordance with sections permitted for public comment from RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd. (‘‘RZBC
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 3:00–3:30 p.m. EST. Those interested in I&E’’),3 Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co.,
CFR 351.213. attending must provide notification by Ltd. (‘‘Taihe’’), and Yixing Union
Dated: December 2, 2015. Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at 5:00 Biochemical Ltd. (‘‘Yixing Union’’).
p.m. EST, via the contact information Based on our analysis of the comments
Christian Marsh,
provided above. Written comments received, we made certain changes to
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping our Post-Preliminary Results. The final
and Countervailing Duty Operations. concerning ETTAC affairs are welcome
any time before or after the meeting. dumping margins for this review are
Appendix I Minutes will be available within 30 listed in the ‘‘Final Results’’ section
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary days of this meeting. below.
Decision Memorandum Topics to be considered: DATES: Effective date: December 14,
(1) Summary The agenda for this meeting will 2015.
(2) Background include discussion of priorities and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(3) Scope of the Order objectives for the committee, trade Krisha Hill, Maisha Cryor, or
(4) Respondent Selection promotion programs within the Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD
(5) DISCUSSION OF THE METHODOLOGY International Trade Administration, and Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
a. Preliminary Determination of No subcommittee working meetings. Compliance, International Trade
Shipments Background: The ETTAC is mandated Administration, Department of
b. Duty Absorption by Public Law 103–392. It was created
c. NME Country Status Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
to advise the U.S. government on Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
d. Separate Rates
(6) Conclusion environmental trade policies and telephone: (202) 482–4037, (202) 482–
programs, and to help it to focus its 5831, or (202) 482–3147, respectively.
[FR Doc. 2015–31426 Filed 12–11–15; 8:45 am]
resources on increasing the exports of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
the U.S. environmental industry.
ETTAC operates as an advisory Background
committee to the Secretary of Commerce For a full history of the events that
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
and the Trade Promotion Coordinating have taken place since the publication
International Trade Administration Committee (TPCC). ETTAC was of the Preliminary Results and the Post-
originally chartered in May of 1994. It Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Environmental Technologies Trade was most recently re-chartered until Decision Memorandum.4 The Issues and
Advisory Committee Public Meeting August 2016. Decision Memorandum is a public
Dated: December 7, 2015. document and is on file in the Central
AGENCY: International Trade Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room B8024 of
Administration, DOC. Edward A. O’Malley,
the main Department of Commerce
ACTION: Notice of federal advisory
Office Director, Office of Energy and
Environmental Industries. building, as well as electronically via
committee meeting. Enforcement and Compliance’s
[FR Doc. 2015–31428 Filed 12–11–15; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From
schedule and proposed agenda of a the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results
meeting of the Environmental of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
Technologies Trade Advisory DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 2014, 80 FR 32353 (June 8, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’).
Committee (ETTAC). 2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
International Trade Administration
DATES: The meeting is scheduled for Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Tuesday, January 12, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. [A–570–937] Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Eastern Standard Time (EST). Compliance, regarding ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Post-Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
From the People’s Republic of China: Administrative Review: Citric Acid and Certain
Room 48019 at the U.S. Department of
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Citrate Salts from the People’s Republic of China;
Commerce, Herbert Clark Hoover 2013–14,’’ dated October 27, 2015 (‘‘Post-
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Building, 1401 Constitution Avenue Preliminary Results’’).
NW., Washington, DC 20230. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 3 The Department initiated the fifth
International Trade Administration, administrative review on RZBC Co., Ltd., RZBC I&E,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘RZBC’’).
Amy Kreps, Office of Energy & Department of Commerce. Only RZBC I&E exported subject merchandise to the
Environmental Industries (OEEI), SUMMARY: On June 8, 2015, the United States during the POR.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce (the
Assistant Secretary, Antidumping and
Room 4053, 1401 Constitution Avenue ‘‘Department’’) published the Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
NW., Washington, DC 20230 (Phone: preliminary results of the fifth Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
202–482–3835; Fax: 202–482–5665; administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of the Compliance, regarding ‘‘Issues and Decision
email: amy.kreps@trade.gov.) This antidumping duty order on citric acid Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Citric Acid and
meeting is physically accessible to and certain citrate salts (‘‘citric acid’’) Certain Citrate Salts from the People’s Republic of
people with disabilities. Requests for from the People’s Republic of China China,’’ issued concurrently with this notice
sign language interpretation or other (‘‘PRC’’), in accordance with section (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Dec 11, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM 14DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_77560/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 13:47:21
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 13:47:21
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Patrick O'Connor or Jeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0989, and (202) 482- 2769, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 77321 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR