80 FR 79279 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Control of Air Pollution From Nitrogen Compounds State Implementation Plan
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 244 (December 21, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 244 (December 21, 2015)
| Page Range | 79279-79283 | |
| FR Document | 2015-31662 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 244 (Monday, December 21, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 79279-79283] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-31662] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0497; FRL-9940-17-Region 6] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Control of Air Pollution From Nitrogen Compounds State Implementation Plan AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Texas through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) on July 10, 2015. The Texas SIP submission revises 30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 117 rules for control of nitrogen compounds to assist the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) moderate nonattainment area (NAA) in attaining the 2008 eight-hour ozone (O3 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 20, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR- 2015-0497, by one of the following methods:www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions. Email: Mr. Guy Donaldson at [email protected]. Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Branch (6MM-AA), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Instructions: Direct comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0497. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and made available online at www.regulations.gov. The EPA includes any personal information provided, unless a comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit any information electronically that is considered CBI or any other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know one's identity or contact information unless it is provided in the body of a comment. If a comment is emailed directly to the EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, then the sender's email address will automatically be captured and included as part of the public docket comment and made available on the Internet. If a comment is submitted electronically, then the EPA recommends that one's name and other contact information be included in the body of the comment, and with any disk or CD-ROM submitted. If the EPA cannot read a particular comment due to technical difficulties and is unable to contact for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider the comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment will be considered the official comment with multimedia submissions and should include all discussion points desired. The EPA will generally not consider a comment or its contents submitted outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional information on submitting comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James E. Grady, (214) 665-6745; [email protected]. To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Grady or Mr. Bill Deese at (214) 665- 7253. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' means ``the EPA.'' Table of Contents I. Background on DFW 2008 Eight-Hour O 3 NAA Designation and Classification [[Page 79280]] II. Background on Chapter 117 Proposed Rule Revisions III. Evaluation of Texas' Proposed Chapter 117 NOX Control SIP IV. The EPA's Proposed Action V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background on DFW 2008 Eight-Hour O3 NAA Designation and Classification On March 27, 2008, the EPA revised the primary and secondary O3 standard to a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). Promulgation of a NAAQS triggers a requirement for the EPA to designate areas as nonattainment, attainment, or unclassifiable, and to classify the NAAs at the time of designation. On May 21, 2012, the EPA established initial area designations for most areas of the country with respect to the 2008 primary and secondary eight-hour O3 NAAQS. The EPA published two rules addressing final implementation \1\ and air quality designations.\2\ The implementation rule established classifications, associated attainment deadlines, and revoked the 1997 O3 standards for transportation conformity purposes. The designation rule finalized the NAA boundaries for areas that did not meet the 75 ppb standard. Furthermore, the finalized boundaries were classified according to the severity of their O3 air quality problems as determined by each area's design value.\3\ The O3 classification categories were defined as Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe, or Extreme. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See 77 FR 30160 ``Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area Classifications Approach, Attainment Deadlines and Revocation of the 1997 Ozone Standards for Transportation Conformity Purposes.'' \2\ See 77 FR 30088, ``Air Quality Designations for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards.'' \3\ The air quality design value for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS is the three-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum eight-hour average ozone concentration. See 40 CFR part 50, appendix I. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Effective July 20, 2012, the DFW 2008 eight-hour O3 NAA was classified as moderate, consisting of ten counties: Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant, and Wise County. With the exception of Wise County, all of these counties were designated as nonattainment with a serious classification under the 1997 O3 standard. Although the NAA was most recently classified as moderate, the first nine counties are still required to meet their more stringent serious classification requirements previously designated under the 1997 O3 standard. Wise County, however, is required to meet the moderate classification requirements since it is newly designated as nonattainment for the DFW area.\4\ Previously, Wise County was classified as an attainment area and was exempt from the O3 NAA requirements under the 1997 eight-hour O3 standard. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ In pursuant to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruling in favor of the EPA's inclusion of Wise County in the DFW 2008 eight-hour ozone nonattainment area as lawful (see USCA Case #12-1309). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- States are required to adopt control measures that implement Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) on major sources of NOX emissions.\5\ The major source emission threshold level for the first nine counties (Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, and Tarrant) remains at a potential to emit (PTE) of fifty tons per year (tpy) NOX based on its serious classification under the 1997 standard. Wise County major source threshold is 100 tpy NOX based on the moderate classification requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The EPA is not making a determination that the TCEQ rules included in these revisions will meet the RACT requirements of the CAA section 182(b) for the 2008 O3 NAAQS. The EPA will make that review in a separate action. The EPA is only finding that these rule changes will strengthen the SIP by achieving NOX reductions in the DFW NAA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Background on Chapter 117 Proposed Rule Revisions On July 10, 2015 the EPA received, the TCEQ submitted rule revisions to 30 TAC, Chapter 117 ``Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds.'' The State revised Chapter 117 for all major sources of NOX in the 2008 DFW O3 NAA for the implementation of RACT requirements in all counties as required by CAA, section 172(c)(1) and section 182(f). The state previously adopted Chapter 117 NOX rules for sources in the DFW area as part of the SIP submitted on May 30, 2007, for the 1997 eight-hour O3 standard. The EPA approved those rules on December 8, 2008.\6\ The scope of the Chapter 117 rule revisions implement the following: \7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See 73 FR 73562. \7\ This is not an exhaustive list of changes to the 30 TAC Chapter 117 rules. For a complete summary of all Chapter 117 sections associated with this SIP revision, please refer to the Technical Support Document (TSD), ``30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 117 Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds,'' a copy of which is posted in the docket of this proposal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Add NO X emission limits and control requirements to major sources in newly designated Wise County.Revoke an exemption for utility turbines and auxiliary steam boilers installed after November 15, 1992 in the DFW area; Provide compliance flexibility to affected units in all areas covered by Chapter 117 for owners or operators of boilers and process heaters used on a temporary basis (<60 calendar days); Repeal certain major source industrial rules and utility rules for the DFW area that are now obsolete due to the passing of compliance dates; Add compliance schedules for the new or revised RACT rules and add compliance dates for sources that become subject to these rules after the initial compliance date; Add definitions to reflect the change in attainment status of Wise County; Implement work practice standards or operating requirements Update associated monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements Establish exemptions Table 2 contains a list of the sections of Chapter 117 with adopted subchapters, divisions, and key sections with modifications associated with the July 10, 2015 DFW 2008 eight-hour O 3 SIP submittal. Table 2--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Proposed for Modification ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Description Section ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subchapter A: Definitions.............. 117.10. Subchapter B, Division 4, DFW Eight- 117.400, 117.403, 117.410, Hour O3 NAA Major Sources. 117.423, 117.425, 117.430, 117.435, 117.440, 117.445, 117.450, 117.454, and 117.456. Subchapter C, Division 4, DFW Eight- 117.1303, 117.1310, 117.1325, Hour O3 NAA Utility Electric 117.1335, 117.1340, 117.1345, Generation Sources. 117.1350, and 117.1354. Subchapter G, Division 1, General 117.8000 Monitoring and Testing Requirements. Subchapter H, Division 1, Compliance 117.9030 and 117.9130, 117.9800 Schedules and Division 2, Compliance and 117.9810. Flexibility. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page 79281]] Table 3 contains a list of the sections of Chapter 117 with adopted subchapters, divisions, and key sections with new requirements associated with the July 10, 2015 DFW 2008 eight-hour O3 SIP submittal. Table 3--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Proposed New ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Description Section ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subchapter B, Division 4, DFW Eight- 117.405, 117.452. Hour O3 NAA Major Sources. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Per TCEQ's request, the following sections listed in Table 4 below will not become a part of the EPA-approved Texas SIP. These rules pertain mainly to the control of carbon monoxide and ammonia emissions, which are not O3 precursors and, therefore, not necessary components of the DFW SIP. The EPA concurs that these rules can remain outside of the SIP. Table 4--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Not in Texas SIP ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Description Sections ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Previously excluded and the TCEQ 117.210(c), 117.225, continues to ask that these remain 117.410(d), 117.425, outside the SIP. 117.1110(b), 117.1125, 117.1310(b), and 117.1325. Adopted new and will not be submitted 117.405(d). as a SIP revision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Table 5 contains subchapters, divisions, and key sections proposed for repeal from the SIP by the TCEQ. The TCEQ adopts the repeal of existing Subchapters B and C in Division 2 as well as sections 117.9010 and 117.9110 of Subchapter H in Division 1 because compliance dates for sources of NOX subject to these have passed and are now considered obsolete. Furthermore, sources previously subject are now required to comply with more stringent rules in existing Subchapter B and C, Division 4 and in revised sections 117.9030, 117.9130. Table 5--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Proposed for Repeal ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Description Section ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subchapter B, Division 2, DFW O3 NAA 117.200, 117.203, 117.205, Major Sources. 117.210, 117.215, 117.223, 117.225, 117.230, 117.235, 117.240, 117.245, 117.252, 117.254, 117.256. Subchapter C, Division 2, DFW O3 NAA 117.1100, 117.1103, 117.1105, Utility Electric Generation Sources. 117.1110, 117.1115, 117.1120, 117.1125, 117.1135, 117.1140, 117.1145, 117.1152, 117.1154, 117.1156. Subchapter H, Division 1, Compliance 117.9010, 117.9110. Schedules. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A complete summary along with all non-substantive changes pertaining to reformatting, restructuring, reorganizing, and administrative revisions will be referenced in the Technical Support Document (TSD), ``30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 117 Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds,'' a copy of which is posted in the docket of this proposal. III. Evaluation of Texas' Proposed Chapter 117 NOX Control SIP Please refer to Table 6 for a list of NOX emissions specifications for major sources in newly designated Wise County. The new NOX emission limits will assure that each source listed will not exceed the 75 ppb O3 NAAQS standard. Table 6--NOX Emission Limits for 2008 DFW 8-Hour O3 NAA for Major Sources in Wise County -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Type Capacity NOX Limit Citation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Process Heaters..................... ...................... Max Rated Capacity >=40 0.10 lb/MMBtu;........ 117.405(b)(1). MMBtu/hr. An option.................. or 82 ppmv NOX at 3% 117.405(b)(1). O2 dry basis. Stationary, Reciprocating Internal Gas-Fired Rich-Burn... ........................... 0.50 g/hp-hr.......... 117.405(b)(2)(A). Combustion Engines. Gas-Fired Lean-Burn... White Superior four-cycle 12.0 g/hp-hr.......... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(i)(I). units that have been placed into service, modified, reconstructed, or relocated before June 1, 2015. White Superior four-cycle 2.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(i)(II). units that have been placed into service, modified, reconstructed, or relocated on or after June 1, 2015. Clark two-cycle units that 12.0 g/hp-hr.......... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I). have been placed into service, modified, reconstructed, or relocated before June 1, 2015. [[Page 79282]] Clark two-cycle units that 2.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II). have been placed into service, modified, reconstructed, or relocated on or after June 1, 2015. Fairbanks Morse MEP two- 4.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(iii)(I). cycle units that have been placed into service, modified, reconstructed, or relocated before June 1, 2015. Fairbanks Morse MEP two- 2.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(iii)(II). cycle units that have been placed into service, modified, reconstructed, or relocated on or after June 1, 2015. All others................. 2.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(iv). Turbines............................ Stationary Gas........ hp rating <=10,000 hp...... 0.55 lb/MMBtu......... 117.405(b)(3)(A). hp rating >=10,000 hp...... 0.15 lb/MMBtu......... 117.405(b)(3)(B). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Various controls for each major source in Wise County are needed to achieve the required NOX limits. Process heaters are expected to achieve compliance after installing dry low-NOX combustors with the proposed 0.10 lb/MMBtu emission specification. Gas- fired, rich-burn, combustion engines are anticipated to reach compliance using nonselective catalytic reduction (NSCR) as primary control technology with air-to-fuel ratio regulators. The addition of a secondary catalyst module may be required to meet the proposed emission specification of 0.50 g/hp-hr, for gas-fired, lean-burn, combustion engines. All other lean-burn engines are estimated to reach compliance after combustion modifications with the proposed 2.0 g/hp-hr emission specification. New gas-fired, lean-burn engines can meet the proposed 2.0 g/hp-hr standard without modification or installation of additional controls. It is estimated that the adopted rules will reduce the amount of NOX in the DFW area by 1.17 tons per day (tpd). The resulting emission reductions will assist Texas in demonstrating attainment of the eight-hour O3 standard within the DFW NAA. As a result, the EPA is proposing to approve the NOX emission requirements for affected major sources in the DFW NAA. IV. The EPAs Proposed Action The EPA is proposing to approve the submitted TAC Chapter 117 SIP revisions into the SIP because they will assist the DFW area into attainment under the 2008 8-Hour O3 NAAQS by keeping each emissions source below 75 ppb. The EPA is proposing to approve all amended, repealed, and new sections of Chapter 117 that are being submitted as part of this SIP revision. The EPA is not making a determination that the TCEQ rules included in these revisions will meet the RACT requirements of the CAA Sec. 182(b) for the 2008 O3 NAAQS. The EPA will make that review in a separate action. The EPA is only finding that these rule changes will strengthen the SIP by achieving NOX reductions in the DFW NAA. V. Incorporation by Reference In this action, the EPA is proposing to include in a final rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference revisions to the Texas regulations as described in the Proposed Action section above. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that states meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reasonably available control technology, Reporting and [[Page 79283]] recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: December 8, 2015. Ron Curry, Regional Administrator, Region 6. [FR Doc. 2015-31662 Filed 12-18-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules 79279
for quality case studies in addition to could improve the overall efficiency and disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
those already being conducted by effectiveness of patent prosecution. not submit any information
OPQA. The USPTO will use the results Dated: December 15, 2015. electronically that is considered CBI or
of the studies to improve its Michelle K. Lee,
any other information whose disclosure
understanding of the quality of its work is restricted by statute. The
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
products and, where appropriate, to take www.regulations.gov Web site is an
Property and Director of the United States
action to remediate quality issues or to Patent and Trademark Office. ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
formulate best practices to further means the EPA will not know one’s
[FR Doc. 2015–31897 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]
enhance quality. For example, if a case identity or contact information unless it
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
study reveals a training issue, the is provided in the body of a comment.
USPTO will develop and deliver the If a comment is emailed directly to the
appropriate training. EPA without going through
This pilot program will help the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION www.regulations.gov, then the sender’s
USPTO determine the usefulness of this AGENCY email address will automatically be
manner of public submission for case captured and included as part of the
study topics as compared to currently- 40 CFR Part 52
public docket comment and made
existing methods, such as public fora [EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0497; FRL–9940–17– available on the Internet. If a comment
and external quality surveys. In Region 6] is submitted electronically, then the
addition, this pilot program will allow EPA recommends that one’s name and
the USPTO to communicate to the Approval and Promulgation of
other contact information be included in
public the case studies determined to be Implementation Plans; Texas; Control
the body of the comment, and with any
useful and the results of those studies. of Air Pollution From Nitrogen
disk or CD–ROM submitted. If the EPA
Compounds State Implementation Plan
IV. Example of a Topic Submission cannot read a particular comment due to
AGENCY: The Environmental Protection technical difficulties and is unable to
The following example is provided to
Agency (EPA). contact for clarification, the EPA may
assist the public in providing high-
ACTION: Proposed rule. not be able to consider the comment.
quality submissions that best
Electronic files should avoid the use of
communicate a focused case study topic SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection special characters, any form of
for consideration: Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
Title: ‘‘Pre-first action interviews and encryption, and be free of any defects or
revisions to the State Implementation viruses. Multimedia submissions (audio,
quality of the resulting patent
Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
prosecution.’’
Proposal for study: ‘‘Pre-first action Texas through the Texas Commission on written comment. The written comment
interviews result in a shorter time-to- Environmental Quality (TCEQ) on July will be considered the official comment
issuance in such applications that are 10, 2015. The Texas SIP submission with multimedia submissions and
issued as patents.’’ revises 30 Texas Administrative Code should include all discussion points
Explanation: In my experience as a (TAC) Chapter 117 rules for control of desired. The EPA will generally not
patent practitioner, interviews with nitrogen compounds to assist the Dallas- consider a comment or its contents
examiners lead to better understanding Fort Worth (DFW) moderate submitted outside of the primary
of the claimed invention by both parties. nonattainment area (NAA) in attaining submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or
In particular, interviews can reveal that the 2008 eight-hour ozone (O3) National other file sharing system). For
the parties are operating under differing Ambient Air Quality Standards additional information on submitting
understandings of the scope of the (NAAQS). comments, please visit http://
claims, the meaning of a claim term, or DATES: Written comments must be www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-
interpretation of a teaching of the prior received on or before January 20, 2016. epa-dockets.
art. When performed early in ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Docket: The index to the docket for
prosecution, these can provide the identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– this action is available electronically at
opportunity to resolve such differences OAR–2015–0497, by one of the www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
before the mutual misunderstanding or following methods: at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
miscommunication results in extended • www.regulations.gov. Follow the Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
prosecution. This permits more efficient online instructions. documents in the docket are listed in
examination as reflected by a shorter • Email: Mr. Guy Donaldson at the index, some information may be
prosecution time for those applications donaldson.guy@epa.gov. publicly available only at the hard copy
that eventually mature into patents. • Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
These efficiency gains are most Donaldson, Chief, Air Branch (6MM– some may not be publicly available at
noticeable after April 1, 2011, when the AA), Environmental Protection Agency, either location (e.g., CBI).
Full First Action Interview Pilot 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Program went into effect. The USPTO Texas 75202–2733. James E. Grady, (214) 665–6745;
should study what effect an interview Instructions: Direct comments to grady.james@epa.gov. To inspect the
before the first action on the merits in Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0497. hard copy materials, please schedule an
a new application has on time-to- The EPA’s policy is that all comments appointment with Mr. Grady or Mr. Bill
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
allowance in applications that are received will be included in the public Deese at (214) 665–7253.
eventually issued as patents, and if docket without change and made SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
there are any particular features of the available online at www.regulations.gov. Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
interview that strongly correlate with The EPA includes any personal or ‘‘our’’ means ‘‘the EPA.’’
the time-to-allowance. Discovery of information provided, unless a
such correlations could lead to USPTO comment includes information claimed Table of Contents
process changes or changes in to be Confidential Business Information I. Background on DFW 2008 Eight-Hour O3
applicants’ approach to prosecution that (CBI) or other information whose NAA Designation and Classification
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:25 Dec 18, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM 21DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_79523/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules 79283
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile • Individuals with a Disability: We Eligible entities for awards under this
organic compounds. will provide an appropriate program include States, public or
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. accommodation, including alternative private agencies and organizations,
formats, upon request. To make such a institutions of higher education, and
Dated: December 8, 2015.
request, please contact Marlina Moses- Indian tribes and tribal organizations.
Ron Curry, Gaither, (202) 795–7409 (Voice) or at
Regional Administrator, Region 6. B. Research Fellowships
marlina.moses-gaither@acl.hhs.gov.
[FR Doc. 2015–31662 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
The purpose of the Research
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Pugh, Administration for Community Fellowships program is to build
Living, telephone (202) 795–7422 research capacity by providing support
(Voice). This is not a toll-free number. to highly qualified individuals,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND This document will be made available including those who are individuals
HUMAN SERVICES in alternative formats upon request. with disabilities, to perform research on
rehabilitation and independent living of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
45 CFR Part 1330 individuals with disabilities. Any
I. Workforce Innovation and individual is eligible for assistance
RIN 0985–AA12
Opportunity Act of 2014 under this program who has training
National Institute on Disability, and experience that indicate a potential
The Workforce Innovation and
Independent Living, and Rehabilitation for engaging in scientific research
Opportunity Act of 2014 (‘‘WIOA,’’ Pub.
Research related to the solution of rehabilitation
L. 113–128), signed into law on July 22,
problems of individuals with
AGENCY: National Institute on Disability, 2014, included significant changes to
disabilities. The program provides
Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Title II of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
grants to support two categories of
Research; Administration for The first of these is the insertion of a Fellowships: Distinguished Fellowships
Community Living; HHS. new name, the National Institute on (for those with seven or more years of
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Disability, Independent Living, and relevant research experience) and Merit
Rehabilitation Research (‘‘NIDILRR,’’ Fellowships (for individuals in earlier
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would which was previously the National stages of their careers in research).
implement the Workforce Innovation Institute on Disability and
and Opportunity Act of 2014 and reflect Rehabilitation Research). WIOA also C. Special Projects and Demonstrations
the transfer of the National Institute on relocates NIDILRR from the Department for Spinal Cord Injuries
Disability, Independent Living, and of Education (‘‘ED’’) to the The Special Projects and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) from Administration for Community Living Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries
the Department of Education to the (‘‘ACL’’) of the Department of Health program provides assistance to establish
Department of Health and Human and Human Services. innovative projects for the delivery,
Services. The previous regulations were demonstration, and evaluation of
II. Programs Authorized by Title II of
issued by the Department of Education. comprehensive medical, vocational, and
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
The rulemaking will consolidate the other rehabilitation services to meet the
Amended by WIOA
NIDILRR regulations into a single part, wide range of needs, including
align the regulations with the current A. Disability, Independent Living, and independent living, of individuals with
statute and HHS policies, and will Rehabilitation Research Projects and spinal cord injuries. The entities eligible
provide guidance to NIDILRR grantees. Centers for an award under these Projects and
DATES: Comments are due on or before The purpose of the Disability and Demonstrations are the same as for
February 19, 2016. Rehabilitation Research Projects and Disability and Rehabilitation Research
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Centers program is to plan and conduct Projects and Centers.
in one of following ways (no duplicates, research, development, demonstrations, III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
please): Written comments may be training, dissemination, and related
submitted through any of the methods activities, including international Department of Education regulations
specified below. Please do not submit activities, to maximize the full inclusion governing the National Institute on
duplicate comments. and integration into society, Disability and Rehabilitation Research
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: You employment, independent living, family are found at 34 CFR parts 350, 356, and
may (and we encourage you to) submit support, and economic and social self- 359. Part 350 sets forth regulations
electronic comments on this regulation sufficiency of individuals with addressing the Disability and
at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow disabilities, especially individuals with Rehabilitation Research Projects and
the instructions under the ‘‘submit a the most severe disabilities, and Centers Program; part 356 sets forth
comment’’ tab. Attachments should be improve the effectiveness of services regulations addressing Disability and
in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or authorized under the Rehabilitation Act Rehabilitation Research Fellowships;
Excel; however, we prefer Microsoft of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 et seq. and part 359 sets forth regulations
Word. To this end, NIDILRR provides grants addressing Special Projects and
• Regular, Express, or Overnight Mail: to establish and support: Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries.
You may mail written comments to the • Disability, Independent Living, and ACL proposes to streamline the
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
following address only: Administration Rehabilitation Research Projects; NIDILRR regulations and to consolidate
for Community Living, Attention: • Field Initiated Projects; them into one part, 45 CFR part 1330.
NIDILRR NPRM, U.S. Department of • Advanced Rehabilitation Research In our regulations, we propose to
Health and Human Services, Training Projects; eliminate regulatory language included
Washington, DC 20201. Please allow • Rehabilitation Research and in the corresponding ED regulations that
sufficient time for mailed comments to Training Centers; and does not add further interpretation to
be received before the close of the • Rehabilitation Engineering Research the statutory language. We also propose
comment period. Centers. to eliminate unnecessary regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:25 Dec 18, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM 21DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_79523/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-19 02:57:10
Document Modified: 2015-12-19 02:57:10
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before January 20, 2016. | |
| Contact | Mr. James E. Grady, (214) 665-6745; [email protected] To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Grady or Mr. Bill Deese at (214) 665- 7253. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 79279 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Hydrocarbons; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Oxides; Ozone; Reasonably Available Control Technology; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR