80_FR_79593 80 FR 79349 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request

80 FR 79349 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 244 (December 21, 2015)

Page Range79349-79351
FR Document2015-31951

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 244 (Monday, December 21, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 244 (Monday, December 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79349-79351]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

    In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed 
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of 
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects 
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the 
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of 
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions 
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.

Proposed Project: Community Support Evaluation (CSE)--New

    The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), is requesting 
clearance for the new data collection associated with the CSE. The CSE 
is a multicomponent evaluation of two SAMHSA programs--Behavioral 
Health Treatment Court Collaborative (BHTCC) and Transforming Lives 
through Supported Employment (SE). SE intends to promote recovery for 
individuals with serious mental illness, substance

[[Page 79350]]

use, and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. The programs 
are rooted in the belief that recovery is a holistic process bolstered 
by trauma-informed care and individual- and community-level support.
    The purpose of the CSE is to (1) describe and assess BHTCC and SE 
grantee activities and procedures, including the intermediate or direct 
effects of the programs on participants; (2) document the application 
and sanctioned adaptations of BHTCC programs in the justice system and 
of the SE Program; and (3) design and implement plans to disseminate 
knowledge about how to replicate effective projects in other States, 
territories, tribal nations, and communities. Findings will inform 
current grantees, policymakers, and the field about ways to transform 
the behavioral health system to cultivate resiliency and recovery, 
actively collaborate with and engage, and improve service delivery for 
individuals with serious mental, substance, and co-occurring disorders 
who are in recovery.
    Eight data collection activities compose the CSE--five for 
administration with BHTCC program grantees and three to be conducted 
with SE program grantees.

BHTCC Study Instruments

    Biannual Program Inventory (BPI)-BHTCC: The BPI-BHTCC is a Web-
based survey that will capture infrastructure development and direct 
services that are part of the BHTCC programs. Data include the types of 
planning, infrastructure, and collaboration grantees are implementing; 
trainings conducted; and direct services offered as part of the 
program. The BPI will be completed by grantee evaluation staff twice 
yearly (April and October) over the grant period.
    System-Level Assessment (SLA) Key Informant Interviews (KIIs): The 
SLA KIIs will be conducted with five stakeholders from each BHTCC 
grantee to assess collaboration strategies to expand or better serve 
participants; processes for recruiting, screening, and retaining 
participants; practices to ensure treatment adherence and criminal 
justice compliance; and involvement of consumers in program planning 
and implementation. Data include implementation processes/outcomes; 
service infrastructure, capacity, entry, and delivery processes; 
management structure; reward and sanction models; trauma-informed 
practices; collaboration among BHTCC participants; and facilitators and 
barriers to collaboration. There are three versions of the SLA KIIs: 
(1) Court personnel (administrators, coordinators, judges, attorneys), 
(2) service provider (case managers, BHTCC peer specialists), and (3) 
consumer (clients, family members). Grantee staff will assist with 
respondent recruitment by collecting consent to contact from potential 
participants and forwarding the forms to the CSE team. The SLA KIIs 
will be conducted in grant years two and four via telephone or Skype. 
The SLA KIIs will cover the same information across years; however, the 
Year 4 SLA KIIs also will ask for specific plans for future 
implementation.
    Concept Mapping: A total of four concept mapping exercises will be 
conducted--one local and three cross-site concept maps will be created. 
All concept mapping exercises will be coordinated at the local level 
with assistance from the CSE team. Beginning in Year two, each grantee 
will identify and recruit up to 20 stakeholders (BHTCC peers, 
consumers, family members of consumers, and court personnel) to 
participate in the first exercise. Concept mapping will be conducted 
via a Web-based program; accommodations will be made for respondents 
who do not have access to computers via telephone or paper/pencil.
    [ssquf] Exercise 1--Local Concept Maps: Between Years two and 
three, each BHTCC grantee will generate a local concept map identifying 
the priority supports for recovery. The exercise will take place in two 
parts. First, participants will be asked to brainstorm as many 
responses as they wish to a focus prompt about system-level change 
(e.g., one way that this BHTCC collaborative provides support to 
consumers is . . .). At a later date, local staff will ask participants 
to sort and rate the full list of responses from the brainstorming 
activity in ``any way that makes sense'' to them. Respondents will 
sort/rate the responses--once for importance and once for frequency--
into groups and name them. The resulting information will be entered 
into Concept System software to generate a local map identifying the 
most important aspects of the grantee program that support recovery.
    [ssquf] Exercise 2--Keys to Recovery (KTR) Map 1: In Year four, up 
to 20 stakeholders from each BHTCC grantees will participate in a 
second sorting/rating of local concept mapping information. Grantee 
staff will develop a list of the most common brainstormed responses to 
the original local concept mapping exercise. The information will be 
used to generate a cross-site map on the basis of input from the 17 
BHTCC sites.
    [ssquf] Exercises 3 and 4--Keys to Recovery Maps 2 and 3: In Year 
four, two groups of up to five BHTCC grantees with a particular court 
structure or program focus (e.g., veterans' court and other BHTCC types 
of court models, such as key recovery supports addressing a specific 
aspect or type of severe mental illness) will participate in two 
concept mapping exercises to generate KTR maps. The program focus will 
be determined after the initial site-specific maps have been analyzed. 
Up to 20 stakeholders from each participating grantee will engage in 
brainstorming and sorting/rating activities. Respondents will 
participate via Web, telephone, or paper/pencil.
    18-Month Client Level Abstraction Tool: The 18-Month Tool is an 
Excel-based tool that collects existing data on long-term client 
outcomes on recidivism. Data include (1) rearrest dates (from the 
National Crime Information Center database), (2) recommitment dates 
(from State departments of corrections and local/county jails and 
corrections), (3) revocation dates (from State and local corrections), 
and (4) risk assessment quantitative score. Grantee staff will complete 
the tool at 18 months from the baseline period for any client enrolled 
in the BHTCC program. Beginning in year two, grantees will upload all 
extracted data on a quarterly basis. In their final upload (last month 
of grant activity), grantees will include data for all clients not 
currently submitted including those enrolled less than 18 months. The 
18-Month Tool will be completed by BHTCC grantee evaluation staff using 
existing sources. In addition, court staff (e.g., court clerks) from 
two BHTCC comparison courts will complete the tool for non-BHTCC 
participants as part of a comparison study.
    Comparison Study Client Level Abstraction Tool: The Comparison 
Study Tool is an Excel-based tool that collects existing data on 
comparison cases (individuals who are not participating in the BHTCC 
program but are comparable in program eligibility) at baseline and six 
months. Baseline data include demographics and status of screening for 
co-occurring disorders, employment, and probation/parole. Data 
abstracted through the six-month tool include employment status, 
probation/parole status, services received (e.g., case management, 
treatment, medical care, after care, peer-to-peer recovery support, and 
education) and number of days services were received. Respondents will 
include court staff

[[Page 79351]]

(e.g., court clerks) at comparison courts who have regular interaction 
with clients during their involvement in the justice system. 
Respondents will complete the tool on the basis of (1) court paperwork 
and (2) information discussed during regular court-related 
interactions.

SE Study Instruments

    Biannual Program Inventory-SE: The BPI-SE is a Web-based survey 
that captures the infrastructure development and direct services that 
are part of the SE programs. Data include the types of planning that SE 
grantees and local implementation sites are implementing and activities 
and infrastructure developed as part of the project. The BPI is 
administered twice yearly (April and October) over the grant period and 
will be completed by SE grantee program staff.
    Scalability/Sustainability Assessment (SSA) KIIs: The SSA KIIs will 
be conducted with various stakeholders to assess local SE program 
resources, infrastructure, outcomes, sustainability, and scalability 
from stakeholders. Data include changes in outcomes, workforce 
development, State-level collaboration, partnerships and policies, and 
scalability and sustainability. There are two versions of the SSA 
KIIs--each is tailored to the intended audience: (1) State-level 
administrator (project directors, agency directors, SECC members) and 
(2) local, pilot-level service provider (local service provider). The 
SSA KIIs will be conducted remotely by telephone and/or Skype 
technology in years two and four of the evaluation with five 
stakeholders from each SE grantee. The KIIs cover the same information 
across years; however, Year four KIIs will follow up on how the 
infrastructure and activities taking place in Year two come to 
fruition.
    Employment Needs Focus Groups (FGs): The employment needs FGs will 
be conducted to gather information about the needs and experiences of 
employment specialists, consumers, and employers as they relate to 
supported employment principles and program goals. Data include local 
program implementation, the adoption of policies and practices for 
sustainability and scalability, and recommendations for program 
improvement and implementation best practices. Employment Needs FGs 
will be conducted with employment specialists and employers (who have 
and have not participated in the program) virtually using a Web-based 
platform (such as JoinMe) in years two and four of grant funding. 
Specific topics are tailored to respondent type.
    [ssquf] Employment specialists will discuss training received and 
techniques used to engage employers, the needs and experiences of 
clients and employers, facilitators and barriers to program 
implementation, and program scalability and sustainability. The 
employment specialist FG will take 90 minutes.
    [ssquf] Employers (e.g., hiring managers, supervisors) will discuss 
experiences and satisfaction with the program, factors that facilitate 
and pose barriers to their participation, and program scalability and 
sustainability. The employer FG will take 60 minutes.
    The estimated response burden to collect this information 
associated with the CSE is as follows, annualized over the requested 
three-year clearance period, as presented below:

                        Total and Annualized Averages: Respondents, Responses, and Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    Burden per
           Instrument                Number of     Responses per   Total Number      response      Annual burden
                                    respondents     respondent     of responses       (hours)        (hours) *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             BHTCC Study Instruments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biannual Program Inventory-BHTCC              17               2              34            0.75              26
System Level Assessment KIIs....              58               1              58            1                 58
18-Month Abstraction Tool.......              19               1              19            5.40           102.6
Comparison Study Abstraction                   2               1               2            7                 14
 Tool (BL)......................
Comparison Study Tool (6 Mo)....               2               1               2            7                 14
Concept Mapping Brainstorm/Sort/             180               1             180            1                180
 Rate...........................
Concept Mapping Sort/Rate.......             115               1             115            0.5               58
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              SE Study Instruments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biannual Program Inventory-SE...               7               2              14            0.75              11
Sustainability/Scalability KIIs.              28               1              28            1                 28
Employer FG.....................              28               1              28            1                 28
Employment Specialist FG........              28               1              28            1.5               42
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................             467  ..............             508  ..............             562
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rounded to the nearest whole number.

    Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 
Room 2-1057, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 OR email a copy 
to [email protected]. Written comments should be received by 
February 19, 2016.

Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2015-31951 Filed 12-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P



                                                                                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Notices                                                                                  79349

                                                  public comment. No public comments                                         plans and instruments, or request more                             accordance with the Administration’s
                                                  were received. The purpose of this                                         information on the proposed project,                               commitment to improving service
                                                  notice is to allow an additional 30 days                                   contact: Ms. Dione Washington, Health                              delivery. By qualitative feedback we
                                                  for public comment. The National                                           Science Policy Analyst, Office of                                  mean information that provides useful
                                                  Institute of Allergy and Infectious                                        Strategic Planning, Initiative                                     insights on perceptions and opinions,
                                                  Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of                                   Development and Analysis, 5601                                     but are not statistical surveys that yield
                                                  Health, may not conduct or sponsor,                                        Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland                                  quantitative results that can be
                                                  and the respondent is not required to                                      20892, or call a non-toll-free number                              generalized to the population of study.
                                                  respond to, an information collection                                      240 669 2100 or Email your request,                                This feedback will provide information
                                                  that has been extended, revised, or                                        including your address to                                          about the NIAID’s customer or
                                                  implemented on or after October 1,                                         washingtondi@niaid.nih.gov. Formal                                 stakeholder perceptions, experiences
                                                  1995, unless it displays a currently valid                                 requests for additional plans and
                                                  OMB control number.                                                                                                                           and expectations, provide an early
                                                                                                                             instruments must be requested in
                                                    Direct Comments to OMB: Written                                                                                                             warning of issues with service, or focus
                                                                                                                             writing. Formal requests for additional
                                                  comments and/or suggestions regarding                                                                                                         attention on areas where
                                                                                                                             plans and instruments must be
                                                  the item(s) contained in this notice,                                      requested in writing.                                              communication, training or changes in
                                                  especially regarding the estimated                                           Proposed Collection: Generic                                     operations might improve delivery of
                                                  public burden and associated response                                      Clearance for the Collection of                                    products or services. These collections
                                                  time, should be directed to the: Office                                    Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service                             will allow for ongoing, collaborative and
                                                  of Management and Budget, Office of                                        Delivery (NIAID), 0925–0668,                                       actionable communications between the
                                                  Regulatory Affairs, OIRA_submission@                                       Expiration Date 1/31/2016,                                         NIAID and its customers and
                                                  omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202–395–6974,                                     EXTENSION, National Institute of                                   stakeholders. It will also allow feedback
                                                  Attention: NIH Desk Officer.                                               Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).                           to contribute directly to the
                                                  DATES: Comment Due Date: Comments                                            Need and Use of Information                                      improvement of program management.
                                                  regarding this information collection are                                  Collection: There are no changes being                                OMB approval is requested for 3
                                                  best assured of having their full effect if                                requested for this submission. The                                 years. There are no costs to respondents
                                                  received within 30 days of the date of                                     proposed information collection activity                           other than their time. The total
                                                  this publication.                                                          provides a means to garner qualitative                             estimated annualized burden hours are
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To                                        customer and stakeholder feedback in
                                                                                                                                                                                                16,100.
                                                  obtain a copy of the data collection                                       an efficient, timely manner, in

                                                                                                                            ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
                                                                                                                                                      Number of           Annual frequency                       Hours per
                                                                                  Type of collection                                                                                                                                        Total hours
                                                                                                                                                     respondents            per response                         response

                                                                                                                                   Estimated Annual Reporting Burden

                                                  Customer satisfaction surveys .................................................                              25,000                                1                         30/60               12,500
                                                  In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) or Small Discussion Groups ..........                                                500                                1                         90/60                  750
                                                  Individual Brief Interviews ........................................................                            200                                1                         15/60                   50
                                                  Focus Groups ..........................................................................                       1,000                                1                             2                2,000
                                                  Pilot testing surveys .................................................................                         200                                1                         30/60                  100
                                                  Conferences and Training Pre- and Post-surveys ..................                                             1,000                                1                         30/60                  500
                                                  Website or Software Usability Tests .......................................                                     100                                1                             2                  200

                                                        Total ..................................................................................               28,000     ..............................   ..............................          16,100



                                                    Dated: December 15, 2015.                                                proposed collections of information, the                           ways to minimize the burden of the
                                                  Brandie Taylor Bumgardner,                                                 Substance Abuse and Mental Health                                  collection of information on
                                                  Project Clearance Liaison, NIAID, NIH.                                     Services Administration (SAMHSA)                                   respondents, including through the use
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–31986 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]                               will publish periodic summaries of                                 of automated collection techniques or
                                                                                                                             proposed projects. To request more                                 other forms of information technology.
                                                  BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
                                                                                                                             information on the proposed projects or
                                                                                                                                                                                                Proposed Project: Community Support
                                                                                                                             to obtain a copy of the information
                                                                                                                                                                                                Evaluation (CSE)—New
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND                                                   collection plans, call the SAMHSA
                                                  HUMAN SERVICES                                                             Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–                              The Substance Abuse and Mental
                                                                                                                             1243.                                                              Health Services Administration
                                                  Substance Abuse and Mental Health                                            Comments are invited on: (a) Whether                             (SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health
                                                  Services Administration                                                    the proposed collections of information                            Services (CMHS), is requesting
                                                                                                                             are necessary for the proper                                       clearance for the new data collection
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Agency Information Collection                                              performance of the functions of the                                associated with the CSE. The CSE is a
                                                  Activities: Proposed Collection;                                           agency, including whether the                                      multicomponent evaluation of two
                                                  Comment Request                                                            information shall have practical utility;                          SAMHSA programs—Behavioral Health
                                                                                                                             (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate                          Treatment Court Collaborative (BHTCC)
                                                    In compliance with Section                                               of the burden of the proposed collection                           and Transforming Lives through
                                                  3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork                                             of information; (c) ways to enhance the                            Supported Employment (SE). SE intends
                                                  Reduction Act of 1995 concerning                                           quality, utility, and clarity of the                               to promote recovery for individuals
                                                  opportunity for public comment on                                          information to be collected; and (d)                               with serious mental illness, substance


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014        17:38 Dec 18, 2015          Jkt 238001       PO 00000       Frm 00048      Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM              21DEN1


                                                  79350                      Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Notices

                                                  use, and co-occurring mental and                        versions of the SLA KIIs: (1) Court                   the basis of input from the 17 BHTCC
                                                  substance use disorders. The programs                   personnel (administrators, coordinators,              sites.
                                                  are rooted in the belief that recovery is               judges, attorneys), (2) service provider                 D Exercises 3 and 4—Keys to Recovery
                                                  a holistic process bolstered by trauma-                 (case managers, BHTCC peer                            Maps 2 and 3: In Year four, two groups
                                                  informed care and individual- and                       specialists), and (3) consumer (clients,              of up to five BHTCC grantees with a
                                                  community-level support.                                family members). Grantee staff will                   particular court structure or program
                                                     The purpose of the CSE is to (1)                     assist with respondent recruitment by                 focus (e.g., veterans’ court and other
                                                  describe and assess BHTCC and SE                        collecting consent to contact from                    BHTCC types of court models, such as
                                                  grantee activities and procedures,                      potential participants and forwarding                 key recovery supports addressing a
                                                  including the intermediate or direct                    the forms to the CSE team. The SLA KIIs               specific aspect or type of severe mental
                                                  effects of the programs on participants;                will be conducted in grant years two                  illness) will participate in two concept
                                                  (2) document the application and                        and four via telephone or Skype. The                  mapping exercises to generate KTR
                                                  sanctioned adaptations of BHTCC                         SLA KIIs will cover the same                          maps. The program focus will be
                                                  programs in the justice system and of                   information across years; however, the                determined after the initial site-specific
                                                  the SE Program; and (3) design and                      Year 4 SLA KIIs also will ask for                     maps have been analyzed. Up to 20
                                                  implement plans to disseminate                          specific plans for future                             stakeholders from each participating
                                                  knowledge about how to replicate                        implementation.                                       grantee will engage in brainstorming
                                                  effective projects in other States,                        Concept Mapping: A total of four                   and sorting/rating activities.
                                                  territories, tribal nations, and                        concept mapping exercises will be                     Respondents will participate via Web,
                                                  communities. Findings will inform                       conducted—one local and three cross-                  telephone, or paper/pencil.
                                                  current grantees, policymakers, and the                 site concept maps will be created. All                   18-Month Client Level Abstraction
                                                  field about ways to transform the                       concept mapping exercises will be                     Tool: The 18-Month Tool is an Excel-
                                                  behavioral health system to cultivate                   coordinated at the local level with                   based tool that collects existing data on
                                                  resiliency and recovery, actively                       assistance from the CSE team. Beginning               long-term client outcomes on
                                                  collaborate with and engage, and                        in Year two, each grantee will identify               recidivism. Data include (1) rearrest
                                                  improve service delivery for individuals                and recruit up to 20 stakeholders                     dates (from the National Crime
                                                  with serious mental, substance, and co-                 (BHTCC peers, consumers, family                       Information Center database), (2)
                                                  occurring disorders who are in recovery.                members of consumers, and court                       recommitment dates (from State
                                                     Eight data collection activities                     personnel) to participate in the first                departments of corrections and local/
                                                  compose the CSE—five for                                exercise. Concept mapping will be                     county jails and corrections), (3)
                                                  administration with BHTCC program                       conducted via a Web-based program;                    revocation dates (from State and local
                                                  grantees and three to be conducted with                 accommodations will be made for                       corrections), and (4) risk assessment
                                                  SE program grantees.                                    respondents who do not have access to                 quantitative score. Grantee staff will
                                                                                                          computers via telephone or paper/                     complete the tool at 18 months from the
                                                  BHTCC Study Instruments
                                                                                                          pencil.                                               baseline period for any client enrolled
                                                    Biannual Program Inventory (BPI)–                        D Exercise 1—Local Concept Maps:                   in the BHTCC program. Beginning in
                                                  BHTCC: The BPI–BHTCC is a Web-                          Between Years two and three, each                     year two, grantees will upload all
                                                  based survey that will capture                          BHTCC grantee will generate a local                   extracted data on a quarterly basis. In
                                                  infrastructure development and direct                   concept map identifying the priority                  their final upload (last month of grant
                                                  services that are part of the BHTCC                     supports for recovery. The exercise will              activity), grantees will include data for
                                                  programs. Data include the types of                     take place in two parts. First,                       all clients not currently submitted
                                                  planning, infrastructure, and                           participants will be asked to brainstorm              including those enrolled less than 18
                                                  collaboration grantees are                              as many responses as they wish to a                   months. The 18-Month Tool will be
                                                  implementing; trainings conducted; and                  focus prompt about system-level change                completed by BHTCC grantee evaluation
                                                  direct services offered as part of the                  (e.g., one way that this BHTCC                        staff using existing sources. In addition,
                                                  program. The BPI will be completed by                   collaborative provides support to                     court staff (e.g., court clerks) from two
                                                  grantee evaluation staff twice yearly                   consumers is . . .). At a later date, local           BHTCC comparison courts will
                                                  (April and October) over the grant                      staff will ask participants to sort and               complete the tool for non-BHTCC
                                                  period.                                                 rate the full list of responses from the              participants as part of a comparison
                                                    System-Level Assessment (SLA) Key                     brainstorming activity in ‘‘any way that              study.
                                                  Informant Interviews (KIIs): The SLA                    makes sense’’ to them. Respondents will                  Comparison Study Client Level
                                                  KIIs will be conducted with five                        sort/rate the responses—once for                      Abstraction Tool: The Comparison
                                                  stakeholders from each BHTCC grantee                    importance and once for frequency—                    Study Tool is an Excel-based tool that
                                                  to assess collaboration strategies to                   into groups and name them. The                        collects existing data on comparison
                                                  expand or better serve participants;                    resulting information will be entered                 cases (individuals who are not
                                                  processes for recruiting, screening, and                into Concept System software to                       participating in the BHTCC program but
                                                  retaining participants; practices to                    generate a local map identifying the                  are comparable in program eligibility) at
                                                  ensure treatment adherence and                          most important aspects of the grantee                 baseline and six months. Baseline data
                                                  criminal justice compliance; and                        program that support recovery.                        include demographics and status of
                                                  involvement of consumers in program                        D Exercise 2—Keys to Recovery (KTR)                screening for co-occurring disorders,
                                                  planning and implementation. Data                       Map 1: In Year four, up to 20                         employment, and probation/parole. Data
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  include implementation processes/                       stakeholders from each BHTCC grantees                 abstracted through the six-month tool
                                                  outcomes; service infrastructure,                       will participate in a second sorting/                 include employment status, probation/
                                                  capacity, entry, and delivery processes;                rating of local concept mapping                       parole status, services received (e.g.,
                                                  management structure; reward and                        information. Grantee staff will develop               case management, treatment, medical
                                                  sanction models; trauma-informed                        a list of the most common brainstormed                care, after care, peer-to-peer recovery
                                                  practices; collaboration among BHTCC                    responses to the original local concept               support, and education) and number of
                                                  participants; and facilitators and                      mapping exercise. The information will                days services were received.
                                                  barriers to collaboration. There are three              be used to generate a cross-site map on               Respondents will include court staff


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:38 Dec 18, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00049   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM   21DEN1


                                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Notices                                                                             79351

                                                  (e.g., court clerks) at comparison courts                                  development, State-level collaboration,                         implementation best practices.
                                                  who have regular interaction with                                          partnerships and policies, and                                  Employment Needs FGs will be
                                                  clients during their involvement in the                                    scalability and sustainability. There are                       conducted with employment specialists
                                                  justice system. Respondents will                                           two versions of the SSA KIIs—each is                            and employers (who have and have not
                                                  complete the tool on the basis of (1)                                      tailored to the intended audience: (1)                          participated in the program) virtually
                                                  court paperwork and (2) information                                        State-level administrator (project                              using a Web-based platform (such as
                                                  discussed during regular court-related                                     directors, agency directors, SECC                               JoinMe) in years two and four of grant
                                                  interactions.                                                              members) and (2) local, pilot-level                             funding. Specific topics are tailored to
                                                                                                                             service provider (local service provider).                      respondent type.
                                                  SE Study Instruments
                                                                                                                             The SSA KIIs will be conducted                                     D Employment specialists will discuss
                                                     Biannual Program Inventory–SE: The                                      remotely by telephone and/or Skype                              training received and techniques used to
                                                  BPI–SE is a Web-based survey that                                          technology in years two and four of the                         engage employers, the needs and
                                                  captures the infrastructure development                                    evaluation with five stakeholders from                          experiences of clients and employers,
                                                  and direct services that are part of the                                   each SE grantee. The KIIs cover the                             facilitators and barriers to program
                                                  SE programs. Data include the types of                                     same information across years; however,                         implementation, and program
                                                  planning that SE grantees and local                                        Year four KIIs will follow up on how the                        scalability and sustainability. The
                                                  implementation sites are implementing                                      infrastructure and activities taking place                      employment specialist FG will take 90
                                                  and activities and infrastructure                                          in Year two come to fruition.                                   minutes.
                                                  developed as part of the project. The BPI                                     Employment Needs Focus Groups                                   D Employers (e.g., hiring managers,
                                                  is administered twice yearly (April and                                    (FGs): The employment needs FGs will                            supervisors) will discuss experiences
                                                  October) over the grant period and will                                    be conducted to gather information                              and satisfaction with the program,
                                                  be completed by SE grantee program                                         about the needs and experiences of                              factors that facilitate and pose barriers
                                                  staff.                                                                     employment specialists, consumers, and                          to their participation, and program
                                                     Scalability/Sustainability Assessment                                   employers as they relate to supported                           scalability and sustainability. The
                                                  (SSA) KIIs: The SSA KIIs will be                                           employment principles and program                               employer FG will take 60 minutes.
                                                  conducted with various stakeholders to                                     goals. Data include local program                                  The estimated response burden to
                                                  assess local SE program resources,                                         implementation, the adoption of                                 collect this information associated with
                                                  infrastructure, outcomes, sustainability,                                  policies and practices for sustainability                       the CSE is as follows, annualized over
                                                  and scalability from stakeholders. Data                                    and scalability, and recommendations                            the requested three-year clearance
                                                  include changes in outcomes, workforce                                     for program improvement and                                     period, as presented below:

                                                                                         TOTAL AND ANNUALIZED AVERAGES: RESPONDENTS, RESPONSES, AND HOURS
                                                                                                                                                                  Responses                                  Burden per
                                                                                                                                                Number of                                  Total Number                                Annual burden
                                                                                     Instrument                                                                       per                                     response
                                                                                                                                               respondents                                 of responses                                  (hours) *
                                                                                                                                                                  respondent                                   (hours)

                                                                                                                                             BHTCC Study Instruments

                                                  Biannual Program Inventory–BHTCC ................................                                      17                          2               34                      0.75                 26
                                                  System Level Assessment KIIs .........................................                                 58                          1               58                      1                    58
                                                  18-Month Abstraction Tool .................................................                            19                          1               19                      5.40              102.6
                                                  Comparison Study Abstraction Tool (BL) ..........................                                       2                          1                2                      7                    14
                                                  Comparison Study Tool (6 Mo) .........................................                                  2                          1                2                      7                    14
                                                  Concept Mapping Brainstorm/Sort/Rate ............................                                     180                          1              180                      1                   180
                                                  Concept Mapping Sort/Rate ..............................................                              115                          1              115                      0.5                  58

                                                                                                                                              SE Study Instruments

                                                  Biannual Program Inventory–SE .......................................                                   7                          2               14                     0.75                 11
                                                  Sustainability/Scalability KIIs .............................................                          28                          1               28                     1                    28
                                                  Employer FG ......................................................................                     28                          1               28                     1                    28
                                                  Employment Specialist FG ................................................                              28                          1               28                     1.5                  42

                                                        Total ............................................................................              467     ........................            508   ..........................            562
                                                     * Rounded to the nearest whole number.


                                                    Send comments to Summer King,                                            DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND                                          ACTION:  30-Day notice and request for
                                                  SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,                                          SECURITY                                                        comments; extension of an existing
                                                  Room 2–1057, One Choke Cherry Road,                                                                                                        collection of information.
                                                  Rockville, MD 20857 OR email a copy                                        U.S. Customs and Border Protection
                                                  to summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.                                                                                                             SUMMARY:   U.S. Customs and Border
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Written comments should be received                                        [1651–0138]                                                     Protection (CBP) of the Department of
                                                  by February 19, 2016.                                                                                                                      Homeland Security will be submitting
                                                                                                                             Agency Information Collection                                   the following information collection
                                                  Summer King,                                                               Activities: Biometric Identity                                  request to the Office of Management and
                                                  Statistician.                                                                                                                              Budget (OMB) for review and approval
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–31951 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]                               AGENCY:  U.S. Customs and Border                                in accordance with the Paperwork
                                                  BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
                                                                                                                             Protection, Department of Homeland                              Reduction Act: Biometric Identity. This
                                                                                                                             Security.                                                       is a proposed extension of an


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014        17:38 Dec 18, 2015          Jkt 238001      PO 00000        Frm 00050     Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703     E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM      21DEN1



Document Created: 2015-12-19 02:57:10
Document Modified: 2015-12-19 02:57:10
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 79349 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR