80 FR 7971 - Pyrimethanil; Pesticide Tolerances
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 30 (February 13, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 30 (February 13, 2015)
| Page Range | 7971-7975 | |
| FR Document | 2015-02949 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 7971-7975] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-02949] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0530; FRL-9922-07] Pyrimethanil; Pesticide Tolerances AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of pyrimethanil in or on pomegranate at 5.0 parts per million (ppm). Janssen PMP requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). DATES: This regulation is effective February 13, 2015. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before April 14, 2015, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0530, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:Crop production (NAICS code 111). Animal production (NAICS code 112). Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0530 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before April 14, 2015. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0530, by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance In the Federal Register of December 17, 2014 (79 FR 75107) (FRL- 9918-90), EPA issued a document pursuant to [[Page 7972]] FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 3F8213) by Janssen PMP, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Rd Titusville, NJ 08560-0200. The petition requested that the 40 CFR 180.518 be amended by establishing a tolerance for residues of the fungicide pyrimethanil in or on pomegranate at 5.0 parts per million (ppm). That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Janssen PMP, the registrant, which is available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .'' Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for pyrimethanil including exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with pyrimethanil follows. A. Toxicological Profile EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. Pyrimethanil is of low acute lethality by the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes. It is a slight eye irritant, is not irritating to the skin, and it is not a dermal sensitizer. A single oral dose of 1,000 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) produced a number of acute signs of neurotoxicity, including ataxia, dilated pupils, and decreases in motor activity, hind limb grip strength, and body temperature. However, there was no evidence of neurotoxicity with repeated dosing in a subchronic neurotoxicity study in rats. The major target organs of repeated oral exposure were the liver, kidney, and the thyroid. These effects were accompanied by decreased body weight. Reproductive toxicity was not observed, and developmental effects (e.g., decreased fetal weight, retarded ossification, extra ribs) were observed only at maternally toxic doses. Special short-term exposure studies demonstrated increased liver uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UDPGT) activity leading to decreases in thyroid hormones (T3, T4) and compensatory increases in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in adult rats. Thyroid adenomas were seen in rats following long-term exposure, and it was concluded that they were mediated via disruption of the thyroid/pituitary axis. There were no concerns for mutagenicity. The EPA has classified pyrimethanil as ``Not Likely To Be Carcinogenic To Humans At Doses That Do Not Alter Rat Thyroid Hormone Homeostasis.'' This decision was based on the following: 1. There were treatment-related increases in thyroid follicular cell tumors in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats at doses which were considered adequate to assess carcinogenicity; however, rats are substantially more sensitive than humans are to the development of thyroid follicular cell tumors in response to thyroid hormone imbalance. 2. There were no treatment-related tumors seen in male or female CD-1 mice at doses which were considered adequate to assess carcinogenicity. 3. There is no mutagenicity concern and there is no evidence for thyroid carcinogenesis mediated through a mutagenic mode of action. 4. The non-neoplastic toxicological evidence (i.e., thyroid growth, thyroid hormonal changes) indicated that pyrimethanil was inducing a disruption in the thyroid-pituitary hormonal status. The overall weight-of-evidence was considered sufficient to indicate that pyrimethanil induced thyroid follicular tumors through a non-linear, antithyroid mode of action. For these reasons, EPA determined that quantification of carcinogenic risk is not required and that the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) (17 mg/kg/day) established for deriving the chronic reference dose (cPAD) would be protective of cancer effects. Due to the non-linear mode of action of pyrimethanil, exposure at the NOAEL is not expected to alter thyroid hormone homeostasis nor result in thyroid tumor formation. Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the adverse effects caused by pyrimethanil as well as the no-observed- adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect- level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in the final rule published in the Federal Register of August 1, 2012 (77 FR 45499) (FRL- 9354-7). B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/riskassess.htm. A summary of the toxicological endpoints for pyrimethanil used for human risk assessment is discussed in Unit III. B. of the final rule published in the Federal Register of August 1, 2012 (77 FR 45500) (FRL- 9354-7). [[Page 7973]] C. Exposure Assessment 1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary exposure to pyrimethanil, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned- for tolerances as well as all existing pyrimethanil tolerances in 40 CFR 180.518. EPA assessed dietary exposures from pyrimethanil in food as follows: i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result of a 1-day or single exposure. Such effects were identified for pyrimethanil. In estimating acute dietary exposure, EPA used food consumption information from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2003-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, What We Eat in America, (NHANES/WWEIA). As to residue levels in food, EPA assumed default processing factors (as necessary), empirical processing factors for orange and apple juice, tolerance-level residues, and 100 percent crop treated (PCT) for all commodities. ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure assessment EPA used the food consumption data from the USDA 2003-2008 NHNES/WWEIA. As to residue levels in food, EPA assumed default processing factors (as necessary), empirical processing factors for orange and apple juice, tolerance-level residues, and 100 PCT for all commodities. iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has concluded that pyrimethanil should be classified as ``Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans at Doses That Do Not Alter Rat Thyroid Hormone Homeostasis''. Therefore a separate cancer exposure assessment was not performed. iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information. EPA did not use anticipated residue and/or PCT information in the dietary assessment for pyrimethanil. Tolerance-level residues and/or 100 PCT were assumed for all food commodities. 2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk assessment for pyrimethanil in drinking water. These simulation models take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport characteristics of pyrimethanil. Further information regarding EPA drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be found at http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm. Based on the Pesticide Root Zone Model/Exposure Analysis Modeling System (PRZM/EXAMS) and Screening Concentration in Ground Water (SCI- GROW) models, the estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) of pyrimethanil for acute exposures are estimated to be 86.5 parts per billion (ppb) for surface water and 4.8 ppb for ground water. For chronic exposures for non-cancer assessments, they are estimated to be 29.4 ppb for surface water and 4.8 ppb for ground water. Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly entered into the dietary exposure model. For acute dietary risk assessment, the water concentration value of 86.5 ppb was used to assess the contribution to drinking water. For chronic dietary risk assessment, the water concentration of value 29.4 ppb was used to assess the contribution to drinking water. 3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control, termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets). Pyrimethanil is not registered for any specific use patterns that would result in residential exposure. 4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' EPA has not found pyrimethanil to share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and pyrimethanil does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that pyrimethanil does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative. D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children 1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor (FQPA SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different factor. 2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. The prenatal and postnatal toxicology database for pyrimethanil includes rat and rabbit developmental toxicity studies and a 2-generation reproduction toxicity study in rats. As discussed in Unit III.A., there was no evidence of increased quantitative or qualitative susceptibility of fetuses or offspring following exposure to pyrimethanil in these studies. 3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the FQPA SF were reduced to 1X. That decision is based on the following findings: i. The toxicity database for pyrimethanil is complete. ii. Although there is evidence of neurotoxicity in the acute neurotoxicity study, concern is low since effects were only seen at the limit dose, effects are well-characterized with clearly established NOAEL/LOAEL values, and the selected endpoints are protective for the observed effects. The thyroid has been shown to be one of the target organs in adult animals for pyrimethanil-induced toxicity thus raising a potential concern for thyroid toxicity in the young. EPA, however concluded that there is no concern for thyroid toxicity in the young based on the following weight of evidence considerations: The effects seen on the thyroid and the liver database, while treatment-related, are not severe in nature; and in each of the studies that show an effect on thyroid hormone levels, as well as in all studies chosen for PODs selection, there is a wide dose spread (~10-fold difference between NOELs and LOAELs) which provides a measure of protection for any potential effects linked to decreased thyroid hormone levels in offspring. iii. There is no evidence that pyrimethanil results in increased susceptibility in in utero rats or rabbits in the prenatal developmental studies or [[Page 7974]] in young rats in the 2-generation reproduction study. iv. The exposure databases are sufficient to determine the nature/ magnitude of the residue in food and dietary analyses are unlikely to underestimate risk of exposure from pyrimethanil. E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE exists. 1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water to pyrimethanil will occupy 38% of the aPAD for children 1-2 years old, the population group receiving the greatest exposure. 2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to pyrimethanil from food and water will utilize 78% of the cPAD for children 1-2 years old, the population group receiving the greatest exposure. There are no residential uses for pyrimethanil. 3. Short-term risk. Short-term and intermediate-term aggregate exposure takes into account short-and intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure level). A short- and intermediate-term adverse effect was identified; however, pyrimethanil is not registered for any use patterns that would result in short-and/or intermediate-term residential exposure. Short-and intermediate-term risk is assessed based on short-and intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic dietary exposure. Because there is no short-and intermediate-term residential exposure and chronic dietary exposure has already been assessed under the appropriately protective cPAD (which is at least as protective as the POD used to assess short-term risk), no further assessment of short-and intermediate-term risk is necessary, and EPA relies on the chronic dietary risk assessment for evaluating short-and intermediate-term risk for pyrimethanil. 4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. The Agency determined that the thyroid tumors seen in rat studies arise through a non-linear mode of action and the NOAEL (17 mg/kg/day) established for deriving the cRfD is not expected to alter thyroid hormone homeostasis nor result in thyroid tumor formation. Thus, the chronic risk assessment addresses any cancer risk. Based on the results of chronic risk assessment, EPA concludes that aggregate exposure to pyrimethanil will not cause a cancer risk. 5. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure to pyrimethanil residues. IV. Other Considerations A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology Adequate enforcement methodology (high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)) is available to enforce the tolerance expression. The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address: [email protected]. B. International Residue Limits In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not established a MRL for pyrimethanil in or on pomegranate. V. Conclusion Therefore, a tolerance is established for residues of pyrimethanil, in or on pomegranate at 5.0 ppm. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as [[Page 7975]] described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). VII. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: February 6, 2015. Daniel J. Rosenblatt, Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180--AMENDED 0 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 0 2. In Sec. 180.518, alphabetically add the commodity ``Pomegranate'' to the table in paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: Sec. 180.518 Pyrimethanil; tolerance for residues. (a) * * * (1) * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Parts per Commodity million ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * Pomegranate................................................. 5.0 * * * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * [FR Doc. 2015-02949 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 7971
WEST VIRGINIA—1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 NAAQS
[Primary and secondary]
Designation a Classification
Designated Area
Date 1 Type Date 2 Type
* * * * * * *
Martinsburg, WV-Hagerstown, MD:
Berkeley County .......................................................................................... 11/25/14 Attainment.
* * * * * * *
a Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
1 This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
2 This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * * FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: proper receipt by EPA, you must
[FR Doc. 2015–02851 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am] Susan Lewis, Registration Division identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, OPP–2014–0530 in the subject line on
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 the first page of your submission. All
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, objections and requests for a hearing
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DC 20460–0001; main telephone must be in writing, and must be
AGENCY number: (703) 305–7090; email address: received by the Hearing Clerk on or
RDFRNotices@epa.gov. before April 14, 2015. Addresses for
40 CFR Part 180 mail and hand delivery of objections
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and hearing requests are provided in 40
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0530; FRL–9922–07] I. General Information CFR 178.25(b).
A. Does this action apply to me? In addition to filing an objection or
Pyrimethanil; Pesticide Tolerances hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
AGENCY: Environmental Protection You may be potentially affected by as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
Agency (EPA). this action if you are an agricultural submit a copy of the filing (excluding
producer, food manufacturer, or any Confidential Business Information
ACTION: Final rule. pesticide manufacturer. The following (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a list of North American Industrial Information not marked confidential
tolerance for residues of pyrimethanil in Classification System (NAICS) codes is pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
or on pomegranate at 5.0 parts per not intended to be exhaustive, but rather disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
million (ppm). Janssen PMP requested provides a guide to help readers notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
these tolerances under the Federal Food, determine whether this document objection or hearing request, identified
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). applies to them. Potentially affected by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
entities may include: 2014–0530, by one of the following
DATES: This regulation is effective
• Crop production (NAICS code 111). methods:
February 13, 2015. Objections and • Animal production (NAICS code
requests for hearings must be received • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
112). www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
on or before April 14, 2015, and must • Food manufacturing (NAICS code
be filed in accordance with the instructions for submitting comments.
311). Do not submit electronically any
instructions provided in 40 CFR part • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the information you consider to be CBI or
code 32532). other information whose disclosure is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
B. How can I get electronic access to restricted by statute.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
identified by docket identification (ID) other related information?
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0530, is You may access a frequently updated DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
available at http://www.regulations.gov electronic version of EPA’s tolerance NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through • Hand Delivery: To make special
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) the Government Publishing Office’s e- arrangements for hand delivery or
in the Environmental Protection Agency CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ delivery of boxed information, please
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/ follow the instructions at http://
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Title40/40tab_02.tpl. www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC Additional instructions on
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request? commenting or visiting the docket,
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., along with more information about
Monday through Friday, excluding legal Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 dockets generally, is available at
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
holidays. The telephone number for the U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, objection to any aspect of this regulation
and the telephone number for the OPP and may also request a hearing on those II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review objections. You must file your objection Tolerance
the visitor instructions and additional or request a hearing on this regulation In the Federal Register of December
information about the docket available in accordance with the instructions 17, 2014 (79 FR 75107) (FRL–9918–90),
at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure EPA issued a document pursuant to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:45 Feb 12, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM 13FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_8001/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 7975
described under Title II of the Unfunded DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Dated: February 9, 2015.
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. HUMAN SERVICES Marilyn Tavenner,
1501 et seq.). Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Medicaid Services.
This action does not involve any
Services
technical standards that would require APPENDIX
Agency consideration of voluntary 42 CFR Parts 406, 407, and 408 CMS Rulings
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology [CMS–4176–NR] Department of Health and Human
Transfer and Advancement Act Services
Announcement of Ruling:
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Implementing United States v. Windsor
for Purposes of Entitlement and Services
VII. Congressional Review Act
Enrollment in Medicare Hospital Ruling No.: CMS–4176–R
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Insurance and Supplementary Medical
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will Date: February 9, 2015
Insurance
submit a report containing this rule and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
other required information to the U.S. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Services (CMS) Rulings are decisions of
Senate, the U.S. House of Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. the Administrator of CMS that serve as
Representatives, and the Comptroller ACTION: Notice of CMS ruling. precedential final opinions, orders and
General of the United States prior to statements of policy and interpretation.
SUMMARY: This document announces a
publication of the rule in the Federal They provide clarification and
CMS Ruling that states the CMS policies
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major interpretation of complex provisions of
for implementing United States v.
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). the law or regulations relating to
Windsor (‘‘Windsor’’), in which the
Medicare, Medicaid, Utilization and
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Supreme Court held that section 3 of the
Quality Control Peer Review, private
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA),
health insurance, and related matters.
Environmental protection, enacted in 1996, is unconstitutional.
They are published under the authority
Administrative practice and procedure, Section 3 of DOMA defined ‘‘marriage’’
of the Administrator.
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and ‘‘spouse’’ as excluding same-sex
CMS Rulings are binding on all CMS
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping marriages and same-sex spouses, and
components, Part A and Part B Medicare
requirements. effectively precluded the Federal
Administrative Contractors (MACs),
government from recognizing same-sex
Dated: February 6, 2015. Qualified Independent Contractors
marriages and spouses.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt, (QICs), the Provider Reimbursement
DATES: The CMS ruling announced in Review Board, the Medicare Geographic
Director, Registration Division, Office of this document is applicable beginning
Pesticide Programs. Classification Review Board, and on the
February 9, 2015, with respect to Medicare Appeals Council and
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is appeals pending on, initiated, or Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) who
amended as follows: reopened in accordance with applicable hear Medicare appeals. Rulings promote
rules after February 9, 2015, for consistency in interpretation of policy
PART 180—AMENDED entitlement and enrollment and adjudication of disputes.
determinations made on or after June This Ruling states the CMS policies
■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 26, 2013. This ruling does not apply to for implementing United States v.
continues to read as follows: appeals of entitlement and enrollment Windsor, 570 U.S. 12, 133 S. Ct. 2675
determinations made before June 26, (2013) (‘‘Windsor’’), in which the
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2013. Supreme Court held that section 3 of the
■ 2. In § 180.518, alphabetically add the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA),
commodity ‘‘Pomegranate’’ to the table Patty Helphenstine (410) 786–0622. enacted in 1996 (codified at 1 U.S.C. 7),
in paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In is unconstitutional. Section 3 of DOMA
‘‘Windsor,’’ (570 U.S. 12, 133 S. Ct. 2675 defined ‘‘marriage’’ and ‘‘spouse’’ as
§ 180.518 Pyrimethanil; tolerance for excluding same-sex marriages and same-
residues.
(2013), the Supreme Court held that
section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act sex spouses, and effectively precluded
(a) * * * (DOMA), enacted in 1996 (codified at 1 the Federal government from
(1) * * * U.S.C. 7), is unconstitutional. recognizing same-sex marriages and
The CMS Administrator signed Ruling spouses.
Parts per CMS–4176–R on February 9, 2015. This MEDICARE PROGRAM
Commodity CMS Ruling, as well as other CMS
million
Rulings are available at http:// Entitlement and Enrollment in
www.cms.gov/Regulations-and- Medicare Hospital Insurance (Part A)
* * * * * Guidance/Guidance/Rulings/ and Medicare Supplementary Medical
Pomegranate .............................. 5.0 index.html. For the readers’ Insurance (Part B)
convenience, the text of the CMS Ruling CITATIONS: Sections 216(h), 226,
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
* * * * * 4176–R is set forth in the Appendix to 226A, 1818(c)–(d), 1837(i) and 1839 of
this notice of CMS ruling. the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
* * * * * Sections 416, 426, 426–1, 1395i–2,
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
[FR Doc. 2015–02949 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am] 1395p and 1395r); 42 CFR 406.5, 406.10,
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, 406.13, 406.24, 406.32(c)–(d), 406.33,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical 406.34, 407.20, 407.22(a)(5), 407.25(c),
Insurance Program) 407.27(b), 408.22 and 408.24.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 11:18 Feb 12, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM 13FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_8001/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 13:18:24
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 13:18:24
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This regulation is effective February 13, 2015. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before April 14, 2015, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). | |
| Contact | Susan Lewis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 7971 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR