80 FR 80376 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 247 (December 24, 2015)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 247 (December 24, 2015)
| Page Range | 80376-80378 | |
| FR Document | 2015-32415 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 247 (Thursday, December 24, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 80376-80378] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-32415] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U. S. C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243. Project: National Outcomes Evaluation of the Garrett Lee Smith Suicide Prevention Program--Revision The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) is requesting clearance for the revision of data collection associated with the previously-approved cross-site evaluation of the Garrett Lee Smith (GLS) Youth Suicide Prevention and Early Intervention Program (GLS Suicide Prevention Program), now entitled National Outcomes Evaluation (NOE). The NOE is a proposed redesign of the currently-approved cross- site evaluation (OMB No. 0930-0286; Expiration, January 2017) that builds on prior published GLS evaluation proximal and distal training and aggregate findings from program activities (e. g., Condron et al., 2014; Walrath et al., 2015). As a result of the vast body of information collected and analyzed through the cross-site evaluation of the two GLS Suicide Prevention Programs components--the GLS State/ Tribal Program and the GLS Campus Program--SAMHSA has identified areas for additional investigation and the types of inquiry needed to move the evaluation into its next phase. The NOE aims to address the field's need for additional evidence on the impacts of the GLS Suicide Prevention Program in three areas: (1) Suicide prevention training effectiveness, (2) early identification and referral on subsequent care follow-up and adherence, and (3) suicide safer care practices within health care settings. The evaluation comprises three distinct, but interconnected core studies--Training, Continuity of Care (COC), and Suicide Safer Environment (SSE). The Training and SSE studies also have ``enhanced'' study components. Core study data align with required program [[Page 80377]] activities across the State/Tribal and Campus programs and provide continuity with and utility of data previously collected (implementation and proximal outcomes). Enhanced components use experimental and quasi-experimental methods (randomized controlled trial [RCT] and retrospective cohort study designs) to truly assess program impacts on distal outcomes (e. g., identifications and referrals, hospitalizations, and suicide attempts and deaths) without undue burden on grantees and youth. This outcome- and impact-focused design reflects SAMHSA's desire to assess the implementation, outcomes, and impacts of the GLS program. The NOE builds on information collected through the four-stage cross-site evaluation approach (context, product, process, and impact) to further the field of suicide prevention and mental health promotion. Of notable importance, the design now accounts for differences in State/Tribal and Campus program grant funding cycles (i. e., 5-year State/Tribal and 3-year Campus programs), while also establishing continuity with and maximizing utility of data previously collected. Further, the evaluation meets the legislative requirements outlined in the GLSMA to inform performance and implementation of programs. Eleven data collection activities compose the NOE--two new instruments, three previously-approved instruments, and six previously- approved and improved instruments. As GLS program foci differ by grantee type, some instruments will apply to either State/Tribal or Campus programs only. Of the 11 instruments, 2 will be administered with State/Tribal and Campus grantees (tailored to grantee type), 6 are specific to State/Tribal grantees, and 3 pertain only to Campus grantees. Instrument Removals Due to the fulfillment of data collection goals, six currently- approved instruments and their associated burden will be removed. The combined estimated annual burden for these instruments is 4,300 hours. These include the State/Tribal Training Utilization and Preservation Survey (TUP-S) Adolescent Version, Coalition Profile, and Coalition Survey, and the Campus Training Exit Survey (TES) Interview Forms, Life Skills Activities Follow-up Interview, and the Student Awareness Intercept Survey. Instrument Continuations Three instruments will be administered only in OMB Year 1 to finalize data collection for the current cross-site evaluation protocol. Each instrument was previously approved as part of the four- stage approach (OMB No. 0930-0286; Expiration, January 2017) and no changes are being made. These include the State/Tribal Referral Network Survey (RNS), TUP-S Campus Version, and Campus Short Message Service Survey (SMSS). Each instrument will be discontinued once the associated data collection requirement has been fulfilled. Instrument Revisions Six currently-approved instruments will be revised for the NOE. Each of the instruments, or an iteration thereof, has received approval through multiple cross-site evaluation packages cleared by OMB. As such, the information gathered has been, and will continue to be, crucial to this effort and to the field of suicide prevention and mental health promotion. [ssquf] Prevention Strategies Inventory (PSI): The PSI has been updated to enhance the utility and accuracy of the data collected. Changes capture different strategies implemented and products distributed by grantee programs, the population of focus for each strategy, total GLS budget expenditures, and the percent of funds allocated by the activity type. [ssquf] Training Activity Summary Page (TASP): New items on the TASP gather information about the use of behavioral rehearsal and/or role-play and resources provided at trainings--practices that have been found to improve retention of knowledge and skills posttraining. In addition, understanding how skills can be maintained over time with materials provided at trainings (e.g., video reminders, wallet cards, online and phone applications) is an area suggested for further study (Cross et al., 2011). [ssquf] Training Utilization and Preservation Survey (TUP-S) 3 and 6-month follow up: The TUP-S has been improved to examine posttraining behaviors and utilization of skills by training participants--factors known to improve understanding of the comprehensive training process and the impact of training on identifications, referrals, and service use. The survey now requests information about training resources received, practice components, trainee participation in role play, and previous suicide prevention trainings attended; experience intervening with a suicidal individual (from QPR evaluation tool), intended use of the training, and referral behaviors; and previous contact and quality of relationships with youth. Broad items about training others, the use/intended use of skills, and barriers/facilitators have been removed. The consent-to-contact form has been modified to add brief items about the trainee and previous identifications/referrals. The TUP-S will be administered at 3 and 6 months post-training to a random sample of training participants via CATI (2000 ST TUP-S 3-mo/600 ST TUP-S 6-mo per year). [ssquf] Early Intervention, Referral, and Follow-up Individual Form (EIRF-I): The EIRF-I has been improved to gather initial follow-up information about youth identified as being at risk as a result of the State/Tribal GLS program (whether or not a service was received after referral). In addition, EIRF-I (1) data elements have been expanded to include screening practices, screening tools, and screening results of youth identified as at-risk for suicide; (2) response options have been expanded/refined (i.e., setting/source of identification, mental health and non-mental health referral locations, and services received); (3) tribal-specific data elements have been added; and (4) sources of information used has been removed. [ssquf] EIRF Screening Form (EIRF-S): Data elements have been added to indicate whether State/Tribal screenings were performed at the individual- or group-level. New response options have been added under ``screening tool'' and ``false positive'' has been removed. [ssquf] Student Behavioral Health Form (SBHF): the SBHF (formerly entitled the MIS) has been expanded and renamed. The Campus form has been enhanced to include referral and follow-up procedure questions (rather than simply counts); numbers screened, identified at risk, receiving suicide-specific services, referred, and receiving follow-up; and age and gender breakdowns of suicide attempts and deaths. Student enrollment/retention items have been removed; these will be obtained through the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. The SBHF will require closer involvement with campus behavioral health/health providers to gather data on procedural questions and screenings, risk assessment, services, referrals, and follow-ups. Instrument Additions Four instruments will augment the evaluation--two are newly developed instruments and two represent new versions of existing instruments. [ssquf] TUP-S RCT (Baseline and 12-Month versions): the TUP-S RCT refers to versions administered as part of the Training Study RCT. The RCT collects TUP-S data at baseline (pre-training) and 3, 6, and 12 months after training. [[Page 80378]] Because the surveys are conducted at different times, each version refers the participant to a specific time period. All trainees from States/Tribes participating in the RCT and who consent to be contacted will be surveyed until the desired sample size of 1332 respondents is achieved. The consent-to-contact form will describe the RCT and the 4 assessment periods. The consent-to-contact form will describe the RCT and the 4 assessment periods. [ssquf] Behavior Health Provider Survey (BHPS): the BHPS is a new State/Tribal data collection activity and the first to specifically target behavioral health providers partnering with GLS grantees. Data will include information about referrals for at-risk youth, SSE care practices implemented, and client outcomes (number of suicide attempts and deaths). A total of 1-10 respondents from each State/Tribal grantee's partnering behavioral health provider will participate annually. The estimated response burden to collect this information associated with the redesigned National Outcomes Evaluation is as follows annualized over the requested 3-year clearance period is presented below: Total and Annualized Averages: Respondents, Responses and Hours -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Burden per Type of respondent Instrument Number of Responses per Total number response Annual burden respondents respondent of responses (hours) (hours) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State/Tribal Instruments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Evaluator......................... PSI......................... 43 4 172 0. 750 129 Project Evaluator......................... TASP........................ 43 4 172 0. 250 43 Project Evaluator......................... EIRF-Individual Form........ 43 4 172 0. 750 129 Project Evaluator......................... EIRF Screening Form......... 43 4 172 0. 750 129 Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S Consent to Contact.... 6,000 1 6000 0. 167 1000 Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S 3 Month Version....... 2,000 1 2000 0. 500 1000 Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S 6 Month Version....... 600 1 600 0. 417 250 Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S RCT BL Version........ 444 1 444 0. 417 185 Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S RCT 3 Month Version... 444 1 444 0. 500 222 Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S RCT 6 Month Version... 444 1 444 0. 417 185 Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S RCT 12 Month Version.. 444 1 444 0. 417 185 Provider Stakeholder...................... RNS......................... 26 1 26 0. 667 17 Behavioral Health Provider................ BHPS........................ 407 1 407 0. 750 305 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Campus Instruments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Evaluator......................... PSI......................... 56 4 224 0. 750 168 Project Evaluator......................... TASP........................ 56 4 224 0. 250 56 Project Evaluator......................... SBHF........................ 56 1 56 0. 667 37 Student................................... TUP-S Campus Version........ 167 1 167 0. 167 28 Student................................... SMSS........................ 734 1 734 0. 083 61 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total............................................................... 12,050 .............. 12,902 .............. 4,129 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Rounded to the nearest whole number Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent by January 25, 2016 to the SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail sent through the U. S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to: OIRA_Submission@omb. eop.gov. Although commenters are encouraged to send their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments to: 202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. Summer King, Statistician. [FR Doc. 2015-32415 Filed 12-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
![80376 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
government-issued photo ID, driver’s license, Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
or passport) and to state the purpose of their Rockville Pike, Building 31, C Wing, 6th HUMAN SERVICES
visit. Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD
Information is also available on the 20892. Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Institute’s/Center’s home page: https:// Services Administration
nccih.nih.gov/about/naccih/, where an Closed: January 29, 2016.
agenda and any additional information for Time: 12:45 p.m. to 1:45 p.m.
Agenda: Review of grant applications. Agency Information Collection
the meeting will be posted when available.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Activities: Submission for OMB
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Review; Comment Request
Rockville Pike, Building 31, C Wing, 6th
Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training
in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
National Institutes of Health, HHS) 20892. Mental Health Services Administration
Open: January 29, 2016.
Dated: December 18, 2015.
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
Time: 1:45 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
information collection requests under
Michelle Trout, Agenda: Common Fund Concepts (Parts 1
OMB review, in compliance with the
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory and 2) and Closing Remarks.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U. S. C.
Committee Policy. Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
[FR Doc. 2015–32395 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am] Rockville Pike, Building 31, C Wing, 6th
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD
20892.
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Contact Person: Franziska Grieder, DVM, Project: National Outcomes Evaluation
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Director, Office of of the Garrett Lee Smith Suicide
HUMAN SERVICES Research Infrastructure Programs, Division of Prevention Program—Revision
Program Coordination, Planning, and
National Institutes of Health Strategic Initiatives, Office of the Director,
The Substance Abuse and Mental
NIH, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 948,
Health Services Administration
Office of the Director, National Bethesda, MD 20892, GriederF@mail.nih.gov,
(SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health
Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting 301–435–0744. Services (CMHS) is requesting clearance
Any interested person may file written for the revision of data collection
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the associated with the previously-approved
comments with the committee by forwarding
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as cross-site evaluation of the Garrett Lee
the statement to the Contact Person listed on
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice Smith (GLS) Youth Suicide Prevention
this notice. The statement should include the
is hereby given of the meeting of the and Early Intervention Program (GLS
name, address, telephone number and when
Council of Councils. Suicide Prevention Program), now
applicable, the business or professional
The meeting will be open to the entitled National Outcomes Evaluation
affiliation of the interested person.
public as indicated below, with (NOE). The NOE is a proposed redesign
In the interest of security, NIH has
attendance limited to space available. of the currently-approved cross-site
instituted stringent procedures for entrance
Individuals who plan to attend and evaluation (OMB No. 0930–0286;
onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles,
need special assistance, such as sign Expiration, January 2017) that builds on
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles
language interpretation or other prior published GLS evaluation
will be inspected before being allowed on
reasonable accommodations, should proximal and distal training and
campus. Visitors will be asked to show one
notify the Contact Person listed below form of identification (for example, a aggregate findings from program
in advance of the meeting. The open government-issued photo ID, driver’s license, activities (e. g., Condron et al., 2014;
session will be videocast and can be or passport) and to state the purpose of their Walrath et al., 2015). As a result of the
accessed from the NIH Videocasting and visit. vast body of information collected and
Podcasting Web site (http:// Information is also available on the analyzed through the cross-site
videocast.nih.gov). Council of Council’s home page at http:// evaluation of the two GLS Suicide
A portion of the meeting will be dpcpsi.nih.gov/council/ where an agenda Prevention Programs components—the
closed to the public in accordance with will be posted before the meeting date. GLS State/Tribal Program and the GLS
the provisions set forth in sections Campus Program—SAMHSA has
552b(c)(4), and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.14, Intramural Research identified areas for additional
U.S.C., as amended. The grant investigation and the types of inquiry
applications and the discussions could Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research
Loan Repayment Program for Individuals needed to move the evaluation into its
disclose confidential trade secrets or next phase.
commercial property such as patentable from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 93.232,
Loan Repayment Program for Research The NOE aims to address the field’s
material, and personal information need for additional evidence on the
concerning individuals associated with Generally; 93.39, Academic Research
Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired impacts of the GLS Suicide Prevention
the grant applications, the disclosure of Program in three areas: (1) Suicide
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan
which would constitute a clearly prevention training effectiveness, (2)
Repayment Program; 93.187, Undergraduate
unwarranted invasion of personal early identification and referral on
Scholarship Program for Individuals from
privacy. subsequent care follow-up and
Disadvantaged Backgrounds, National
Name of Committee: Council of Councils. Institutes of Health, HHS) adherence, and (3) suicide safer care
Open: January 29, 2016.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
practices within health care settings.
Time: 8:15 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Dated: December 17, 2015.
The evaluation comprises three distinct,
Agenda: Call to Order and Introductions; Carolyn Baum, but interconnected core studies—
Announcements; NIH Update; Creation of Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office
Training, Continuity of Care (COC), and
Committee Policy. Suicide Safer Environment (SSE). The
in DPCPSI; Precision Medicine Initiative—
Council’s Role in Overseeing the Cohort [FR Doc. 2015–32396 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am] Training and SSE studies also have
Advisory Panel; ORIP Strategic Plan BILLING CODE 4140–01–P ‘‘enhanced’’ study components. Core
Presentation and Discussion. study data align with required program
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:57 Dec 23, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM 24DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_80623/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices 80377
activities across the State/Tribal and finalize data collection for the current use/intended use of skills, and barriers/
Campus programs and provide cross-site evaluation protocol. Each facilitators have been removed. The
continuity with and utility of data instrument was previously approved as consent-to-contact form has been
previously collected (implementation part of the four-stage approach (OMB modified to add brief items about the
and proximal outcomes). Enhanced No. 0930–0286; Expiration, January trainee and previous identifications/
components use experimental and 2017) and no changes are being made. referrals. The TUP–S will be
quasi-experimental methods These include the State/Tribal Referral administered at 3 and 6 months post-
(randomized controlled trial [RCT] and Network Survey (RNS), TUP–S Campus training to a random sample of training
retrospective cohort study designs) to Version, and Campus Short Message participants via CATI (2000 ST TUP–S
truly assess program impacts on distal Service Survey (SMSS). Each 3-mo/600 ST TUP–S 6-mo per year).
outcomes (e. g., identifications and instrument will be discontinued once D Early Intervention, Referral, and
referrals, hospitalizations, and suicide the associated data collection Follow-up Individual Form (EIRF–I):
attempts and deaths) without undue requirement has been fulfilled. The EIRF–I has been improved to gather
burden on grantees and youth. This initial follow-up information about
Instrument Revisions youth identified as being at risk as a
outcome- and impact-focused design
reflects SAMHSA’s desire to assess the Six currently-approved instruments result of the State/Tribal GLS program
implementation, outcomes, and impacts will be revised for the NOE. Each of the (whether or not a service was received
of the GLS program. instruments, or an iteration thereof, has after referral). In addition, EIRF–I (1)
The NOE builds on information received approval through multiple data elements have been expanded to
collected through the four-stage cross- cross-site evaluation packages cleared include screening practices, screening
site evaluation approach (context, by OMB. As such, the information tools, and screening results of youth
product, process, and impact) to further gathered has been, and will continue to identified as at-risk for suicide; (2)
the field of suicide prevention and be, crucial to this effort and to the field response options have been expanded/
mental health promotion. Of notable of suicide prevention and mental health refined (i.e., setting/source of
importance, the design now accounts for promotion. identification, mental health and non-
differences in State/Tribal and Campus D Prevention Strategies Inventory mental health referral locations, and
program grant funding cycles (i. e., 5- (PSI): The PSI has been updated to services received); (3) tribal-specific
year State/Tribal and 3-year Campus enhance the utility and accuracy of the data elements have been added; and (4)
programs), while also establishing data collected. Changes capture sources of information used has been
continuity with and maximizing utility different strategies implemented and removed.
of data previously collected. Further, products distributed by grantee D EIRF Screening Form (EIRF–S): Data
the evaluation meets the legislative programs, the population of focus for elements have been added to indicate
requirements outlined in the GLSMA to each strategy, total GLS budget whether State/Tribal screenings were
inform performance and expenditures, and the percent of funds performed at the individual- or group-
implementation of programs. allocated by the activity type. level. New response options have been
Eleven data collection activities D Training Activity Summary Page added under ‘‘screening tool’’ and ‘‘false
compose the NOE—two new (TASP): New items on the TASP gather positive’’ has been removed.
instruments, three previously-approved information about the use of behavioral D Student Behavioral Health Form
instruments, and six previously- rehearsal and/or role-play and resources (SBHF): the SBHF (formerly entitled the
approved and improved instruments. As provided at trainings—practices that MIS) has been expanded and renamed.
GLS program foci differ by grantee type, have been found to improve retention of The Campus form has been enhanced to
some instruments will apply to either knowledge and skills posttraining. In include referral and follow-up
State/Tribal or Campus programs only. addition, understanding how skills can procedure questions (rather than simply
Of the 11 instruments, 2 will be be maintained over time with materials counts); numbers screened, identified at
administered with State/Tribal and provided at trainings (e.g., video risk, receiving suicide-specific services,
Campus grantees (tailored to grantee reminders, wallet cards, online and referred, and receiving follow-up; and
type), 6 are specific to State/Tribal phone applications) is an area suggested age and gender breakdowns of suicide
grantees, and 3 pertain only to Campus for further study (Cross et al., 2011). attempts and deaths. Student
grantees. D Training Utilization and enrollment/retention items have been
Preservation Survey (TUP–S) 3 and 6- removed; these will be obtained through
Instrument Removals month follow up: The TUP–S has been the Integrated Postsecondary Education
Due to the fulfillment of data improved to examine posttraining Data System. The SBHF will require
collection goals, six currently-approved behaviors and utilization of skills by closer involvement with campus
instruments and their associated burden training participants—factors known to behavioral health/health providers to
will be removed. The combined improve understanding of the gather data on procedural questions and
estimated annual burden for these comprehensive training process and the screenings, risk assessment, services,
instruments is 4,300 hours. These impact of training on identifications, referrals, and follow-ups.
include the State/Tribal Training referrals, and service use. The survey
Utilization and Preservation Survey now requests information about training Instrument Additions
(TUP–S) Adolescent Version, Coalition resources received, practice Four instruments will augment the
Profile, and Coalition Survey, and the components, trainee participation in evaluation—two are newly developed
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Campus Training Exit Survey (TES) role play, and previous suicide instruments and two represent new
Interview Forms, Life Skills Activities prevention trainings attended; versions of existing instruments.
Follow-up Interview, and the Student experience intervening with a suicidal D TUP–S RCT (Baseline and 12-
Awareness Intercept Survey. individual (from QPR evaluation tool), Month versions): the TUP–S RCT refers
intended use of the training, and referral to versions administered as part of the
Instrument Continuations behaviors; and previous contact and Training Study RCT. The RCT collects
Three instruments will be quality of relationships with youth. TUP–S data at baseline (pre-training)
administered only in OMB Year 1 to Broad items about training others, the and 3, 6, and 12 months after training.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:57 Dec 23, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM 24DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_80623/page/2.svg)
![80378 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
Because the surveys are conducted at contact form will describe the RCT and and deaths). A total of 1–10 respondents
different times, each version refers the the 4 assessment periods. from each State/Tribal grantee’s
participant to a specific time period. All D Behavior Health Provider Survey partnering behavioral health provider
trainees from States/Tribes participating (BHPS): the BHPS is a new State/Tribal will participate annually.
in the RCT and who consent to be data collection activity and the first to
The estimated response burden to
contacted will be surveyed until the specifically target behavioral health
providers partnering with GLS grantees. collect this information associated with
desired sample size of 1332 respondents the redesigned National Outcomes
is achieved. The consent-to-contact form Data will include information about
referrals for at-risk youth, SSE care Evaluation is as follows annualized over
will describe the RCT and the 4 the requested 3-year clearance period is
practices implemented, and client
assessment periods. The consent-to- presented below:
outcomes (number of suicide attempts
TOTAL AND ANNUALIZED AVERAGES: RESPONDENTS, RESPONSES AND HOURS
Responses Burden per
Number of Total number Annual burden
Type of respondent Instrument per response
respondents of responses (hours)
respondent (hours)
State/Tribal Instruments
Project Evaluator ................. PSI ...................................... 43 4 172 0. 750 129
Project Evaluator ................. TASP .................................. 43 4 172 0. 250 43
Project Evaluator ................. EIRF–Individual Form ........ 43 4 172 0. 750 129
Project Evaluator ................. EIRF Screening Form ........ 43 4 172 0. 750 129
Provider Trainee ................. TUP–S Consent to Contact 6,000 1 6000 0. 167 1000
Provider Trainee ................. TUP–S 3 Month Version .... 2,000 1 2000 0. 500 1000
Provider Trainee ................. TUP–S 6 Month Version .... 600 1 600 0. 417 250
Provider Trainee ................. TUP–S RCT BL Version .... 444 1 444 0. 417 185
Provider Trainee ................. TUP–S RCT 3 Month 444 1 444 0. 500 222
Version.
Provider Trainee ................. TUP–S RCT 6 Month 444 1 444 0. 417 185
Version.
Provider Trainee ................. TUP–S RCT 12 Month 444 1 444 0. 417 185
Version.
Provider Stakeholder .......... RNS .................................... 26 1 26 0. 667 17
Behavioral Health Provider BHPS .................................. 407 1 407 0. 750 305
Campus Instruments
Project Evaluator ................. PSI ...................................... 56 4 224 0. 750 168
Project Evaluator ................. TASP .................................. 56 4 224 0. 250 56
Project Evaluator ................. SBHF .................................. 56 1 56 0. 667 37
Student ................................ TUP–S Campus Version .... 167 1 167 0. 167 28
Student ................................ SMSS ................................. 734 1 734 0. 083 61
Total .............................................................................. 12,050 ........................ 12,902 ........................ 4,129
* Rounded to the nearest whole number
Written comments and Affairs, New Executive Office Building, ACTION: Committee Management; Notice
recommendations concerning the Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. of Federal Advisory Committee Meeting.
proposed information collection should Summer King,
be sent by January 25, 2016 to the SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on
Statistician. Commercial Operations to U.S. Customs
SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of
[FR Doc. 2015–32415 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am] and Border Protection (COAC) will meet
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P on January 13, 2016, in New Orleans,
Office of Management and Budget LA. The meeting will be open to the
(OMB). To ensure timely receipt of public.
comments, and to avoid potential delays
in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail DATES: The Advisory Committee on
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Commercial Operations to U.S. Customs
sent through the U. S. Postal Service, SECURITY
commenters are encouraged to submit and Border Protection (COAC) will meet
their comments to OMB via email to: U.S. Customs and Border Protection on Wednesday, January 13, 2016, from
1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. CST. Please note
OIRA_Submission@omb. eop.gov.
that the meeting may close early if the
Although commenters are encouraged to [Docket No. USCBP–2015–0057]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
committee has completed its business.
send their comments via email, Pre-Registration: Meeting participants
commenters may also fax their Advisory Committee on Commercial
Operations to U.S. Customs and may attend either in person or via
comments to: 202–395–7285. webinar after pre-registering using a
Commenters may also mail them to: Border Protection (COAC)
method indicated below:
Office of Management and Budget, AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border For members of the public who plan
Office of Information and Regulatory Protection, Department of Homeland to attend the meeting in person, please
Security (DHS). register either online at https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:57 Dec 23, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM 24DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_80623/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-24 02:25:11
Document Modified: 2015-12-24 02:25:11
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 80376 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR