80 FR 80784 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 248 (December 28, 2015)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 248 (December 28, 2015)
| Page Range | 80784-80785 | |
| FR Document | 2015-32584 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 248 (Monday, December 28, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 80784-80785] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-32584] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243. Project: Violence Intervention To Enrich Lives (VITEL) Supplement--NEW This data collection is to study the intersection of intimate partner violence (IPV) and trauma for women with HIV, at risk for HIV, and at risk for substance use disorders (SUDs) VITEL provides supplemental funding to existing SAMHSA Targeted Capacity Expansion: Substance Abuse Treatment for Racial/Ethnic Minority Women at High Risk for HIV/AIDS (TCE-HIV: Minority Women) grantees. These activities will be conducted with five grantees and include: (1) Administration of baseline, discharge and 6-month post-baseline surveys of clients receiving IPV screening and referral services, (2) focus groups with clients receiving IPV and SUD services, (3) documentation of IPV service and other referral service(s) engagement, and (4) semi- structured interviews with VITEL program staff and partner/ collaborating staff supporting IPV services. The goals of the VITEL program are (1) reduce IPV through screening and referrals, (2) reduce risky behaviors that lead to new HIV infections and SUDs, (3) increase access to care and improve health outcomes for people living with HIV and AIDS, (4) reduce HIV-related health disparities resultant from IPV screening tool implementation, and (5) determine the feasibility of integrating IPV screening in behavioral health settings. A multi-stage approach has been used to develop the appropriate theoretical framework, conceptual model, evaluation design and protocols, and data collection instrumentation. Process and outcome measures have been developed to fully capture community and contextual conditions, the scope of the VITEL program implementation and activities, and client outcomes. A mixed-method approach (e.g., surveys, semi-structured interviews, focus groups) will be used, for example, to examine collaborative [[Page 80785]] community linkages established between grantees and other service providers (e.g., primary health care, SUD recovery), determine which program models and what type and amount of client exposure to services contribute to significant changes in IPV, SUD, and HIV risk behaviors of the targeted populations, and determine the impact of VITEL services on providers, clients, and communities. The data collection for this program will be conducted quarterly (during this one year supplemental period) and the client outcome data collection will be ongoing throughout the program and will be collected at baseline, discharge and 6-months post baseline for all treatment clients. The respondents are clinic-based social workers, counselors, administrators, and clinic-based clients. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Responses per Total response Hours per Total burden Instrument/Activity respondents respondent numbers response hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baseline data collection 500 1 500 .42 210 (Clients)...................... Discharge data collection 400 1 400 .42 168 (Clients)...................... 6-Month post Baseline data 400 1 400 .42 168 collection (Clients)........... Interaction Form (Client)....... 500 1 500 .42 210 Treatment Focus Group (Client).. 45 2 90 1.0 90 Client Sub-total............ 500 .............. 1,890 .............. 846 Executives and Project Director/ 10 1 10 .75 7.5 Program Manager (Semi- Structured Interviews)......... Executives and Project Director/ 5 1 5 3.0 15 Program Manager (Progress Report)........................ Direct Staff (Semi-Structured 10 1 10 .75 7.5 Interviews).................... Community Collaborators (Semi- 10 1 10 1.0 10 Structured Interviews)......... Staff Sub-total............. 35 .............. 35 .............. 40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total................... 535 .............. 1,925 .............. 886 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent by January 27, 2016 to the SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to: [email protected]. Although commenters are encouraged to send their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments to: 202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. Summer King, Statistician. [FR Doc. 2015-32584 Filed 12-24-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
![80784 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 248 / Monday, December 28, 2015 / Notices
increasing the number of culturally supported by the data collection efforts will be asked to describe (1) their
competent master’s level behavioral described below. The information to be program, how they learned about it, and
health professionals and addiction collected is necessary to (a) assess the what led them to apply; (2) the effects
counselors serving children, effectiveness of the grantees’ program of the program on their interest in
adolescents, and populations in recruitment strategies, (b) describe the working with at risk children,
transition to adulthood (ages 16–25) in services that the programs offer, and (c) adolescents, and transition age youth
an effort to increase access to, and assess whether NITT–MFP is meeting its from racially and ethnically diverse
quality of, behavioral health care for goal of increasing the skilled workforce backgrounds (and for MFP–AC fellows,
these age groups. The NITT–MFP— by increasing the number of behavioral in the area of addiction counseling); (3)
Youth program funded five grantees to health providers and addiction
whether the program improved their
each support up to 48 master’s level counselors providing services to
understanding of and ability to provide
fellows per year committed to underserved children, adolescents, and
addressing the behavioral health needs transition-age youth, particularly among culturally competent services; (4)
of at risk children, adolescents, and racially/ethnically diverse populations. whether they completed their
transition-age youth (ages 16–25). The About 4 to 5 months after completion fellowship and the effects of the stipend
NITT–MFP—Addiction Counselors of their fellowship, a subset of fellow on their education and career; (5) their
program funded two grantees to each alumni will be asked to participate in current employment setting, and, if in
support up to 30 master’s level fellows the NITT–MFP Fellow Interview. These behavior health services, the
per year in their final year of addiction telephone interviews will collect characteristics of their client
counseling university programs, with a detailed qualitative information on population; (6) the role that their
focus on providing culturally sensitive fellows’ experiences that are not fellowship played in their job interests
addiction counseling to underserved possible to collect in a survey. The and job search; and (7) their satisfaction
youth in the 16–25 age group. interview is timed to collect fellows’ with the fellowship program and
The NITT–MFP evaluation is impressions of their fellowship assessment of its impact on their career
designed to assess the level of success experiences before too much time has and professional activities. A maximum
of the grantees in meeting the programs’ passed, as well as their initial labor of 66 fellow alumni are expected to
goals and identify the factors that market outcomes. The information complete the NITT–MFP Fellow
contribute to differences among grantees collected will be used to assess the Interview per year; respondents will
in levels of success. The evaluation NITT–MFP program factors associated complete the telephone interview one
includes both process and outcome with employment and other post-
time.
evaluation components and will be fellowship outcomes. The interviewees
ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Responses
Number of Total number Hours per Total burden
Instrument per
respondents of responses response hours
respondent
NITT–MFP Fellow Interview ................................................ 66 1 66 1 66
Send comments to Summer King, Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. interviews with VITEL program staff
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Chapter 35). To request a copy of these and partner/collaborating staff
Room 2–1057, One Choke Cherry Road, documents, call the SAMHSA Reports supporting IPV services.
Rockville, MD 20857 OR email her a Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243. The goals of the VITEL program are
copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. (1) reduce IPV through screening and
Project: Violence Intervention To
Written comments should be received referrals, (2) reduce risky behaviors that
Enrich Lives (VITEL) Supplement—
by February 26, 2016. lead to new HIV infections and SUDs,
NEW
Summer King, (3) increase access to care and improve
Statistician.
This data collection is to study the health outcomes for people living with
intersection of intimate partner violence HIV and AIDS, (4) reduce HIV-related
[FR Doc. 2015–32559 Filed 12–24–15; 8:45 am]
(IPV) and trauma for women with HIV, health disparities resultant from IPV
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
at risk for HIV, and at risk for substance screening tool implementation, and (5)
use disorders (SUDs) VITEL provides determine the feasibility of integrating
supplemental funding to existing IPV screening in behavioral health
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
SAMHSA Targeted Capacity Expansion: settings. A multi-stage approach has
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse Treatment for Racial/ been used to develop the appropriate
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Ethnic Minority Women at High Risk for theoretical framework, conceptual
Services Administration HIV/AIDS (TCE–HIV: Minority Women) model, evaluation design and protocols,
grantees. These activities will be and data collection instrumentation.
Agency Information Collection conducted with five grantees and Process and outcome measures have
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Activities: Submission for OMB include: (1) Administration of baseline, been developed to fully capture
Review; Comment Request discharge and 6-month post-baseline community and contextual conditions,
surveys of clients receiving IPV the scope of the VITEL program
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and screening and referral services, (2) focus implementation and activities, and
Mental Health Services Administration groups with clients receiving IPV and client outcomes. A mixed-method
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of SUD services, (3) documentation of IPV approach (e.g., surveys, semi-structured
information collection requests under service and other referral service(s) interviews, focus groups) will be used,
OMB review, in compliance with the engagement, and (4) semi-structured for example, to examine collaborative
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:31 Dec 24, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_81032/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 248 / Monday, December 28, 2015 / Notices 80785
community linkages established SUD, and HIV risk behaviors of the client outcome data collection will be
between grantees and other service targeted populations, and determine the ongoing throughout the program and
providers (e.g., primary health care, impact of VITEL services on providers, will be collected at baseline, discharge
SUD recovery), determine which clients, and communities. and 6-months post baseline for all
program models and what type and The data collection for this program treatment clients. The respondents are
amount of client exposure to services will be conducted quarterly (during this clinic-based social workers, counselors,
contribute to significant changes in IPV, one year supplemental period) and the administrators, and clinic-based clients.
Responses
Number of Total response Hours per Total burden
Instrument/Activity per
respondents numbers response hours
respondent
Baseline data collection (Clients) ........................................ 500 1 500 .42 210
Discharge data collection (Clients) ...................................... 400 1 400 .42 168
6-Month post Baseline data collection (Clients) .................. 400 1 400 .42 168
Interaction Form (Client) ...................................................... 500 1 500 .42 210
Treatment Focus Group (Client) .......................................... 45 2 90 1.0 90
Client Sub-total ............................................................. 500 ........................ 1,890 ........................ 846
Executives and Project Director/Program Manager (Semi-
Structured Interviews) ...................................................... 10 1 10 .75 7.5
Executives and Project Director/Program Manager
(Progress Report) ............................................................. 5 1 5 3.0 15
Direct Staff (Semi-Structured Interviews) ............................ 10 1 10 .75 7.5
Community Collaborators (Semi-Structured Interviews) ..... 10 1 10 1.0 10
Staff Sub-total ............................................................... 35 ........................ 35 ........................ 40
Total ....................................................................... 535 ........................ 1,925 ........................ 886
Written comments and Thirty-day notice requesting
ACTION: www.regulations.gov. Additionally,
recommendations concerning the comments. copies are available from: Commandant
proposed information collection should (CG–612), Attn: Paperwork Reduction
be sent by January 27, 2016 to the SUMMARY: In compliance with the Act Manager, U.S. Coast Guard, 2100
SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the 2nd Street SW., Stop 7710, Washington,
Information and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an DC 20593–7710.
Office of Management and Budget Information Collection Request (ICR), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
(OMB). To ensure timely receipt of abstracted below, to the Office of Anthony Smith, Office of Information
comments, and to avoid potential delays Management and Budget (OMB), Office Management, telephone 202–475–3532,
in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail of Information and Regulatory Affairs or fax 202–372–8405, for questions on
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, (OIRA), requesting an extension of its these documents.
commenters are encouraged to submit approval for the following collection of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
their comments to OMB via email to: information: 1625–0003, Boating
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Accident Report. Our ICR describe the Public Participation and Request for
Although commenters are encouraged to information we seek to collect from the Comments
send their comments via email, public. Review and comments by OIRA This Notice relies on the authority of
commenters may also fax their ensure we only impose paperwork the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995;
comments to: 202–395–7285. burdens commensurate with our 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An
Commenters may also mail them to: performance of duties. ICR is an application to OIRA seeking
Office of Management and Budget, DATES: Comments must reach the Coast the approval, extension, or renewal of a
Office of Information and Regulatory Guard and OIRA on or before January Coast Guard collection of information
Affairs, New Executive Office Building, 27, 2016. (Collection). The ICR contains
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments information describing the Collection’s
Summer King, identified by Coast Guard docket purpose, the Collection’s likely burden
Statistician. number [USCG–2015–0629] to the Coast on the affected public, an explanation of
[FR Doc. 2015–32584 Filed 12–24–15; 8:45 am] Guard using the Federal eRulemaking the necessity of the Collection, and
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. other important information describing
Alternatively, you may submit the Collection. There is one ICR for each
comments to OIRA using one of the Collection. The Coast Guard invites
following means: comments on whether this ICR should
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
(1) Email: OIRA-submission@ be granted based on the Collection being
SECURITY
omb.eop.gov. necessary for the proper performance of
Coast Guard (2) Mail: OIRA, 725 17th Street NW., Departmental functions. In particular,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Washington, DC 20503, attention Desk the Coast Guard would appreciate
[Docket No. USCG–2015–0629] Officer for the Coast Guard. comments addressing: (1) The practical
(3) Fax: 202–395–6566. To ensure utility of the Collection; (2) the accuracy
Collection of Information Under
your comments are received in a timely of the estimated burden of the
Review by Office of Management and
manner, mark the fax, attention Desk Collection; (3) ways to enhance the
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625–
Officer for the Coast Guard. quality, utility, and clarity of
0003
A copy of the ICR is available through information subject to the Collection;
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. the docket on the Internet at http:// and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:31 Dec 24, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_81032/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-02 09:24:40
Document Modified: 2018-03-02 09:24:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 80784 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR