80 FR 81573 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules 5810(4), 5810(c), 5815(c) and 5820(d) To Provide Staff With Limited Discretion To Grant a Listed Company That Failed To Hold Its Annual Meeting of Shareholders an Extension of Time To Comply With the Requirement
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 250 (December 30, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 250 (December 30, 2015)
| Page Range | 81573-81576 | |
| FR Document | 2015-32647 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 30, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 81573-81576] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-32647] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-76731; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2015-144] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules 5810(4), 5810(c), 5815(c) and 5820(d) To Provide Staff With Limited Discretion To Grant a Listed Company That Failed To Hold Its Annual Meeting of Shareholders an Extension of Time To Comply With the Requirement December 22, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on December 9, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change NASDAQ proposes to amend Rule 5810(c) to provide NASDAQ staff with limited discretion to grant a listed company additional time to solicit proxies and hold an annual meeting of shareholders. The text of the proposed rule change is available from NASDAQ's Web site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/Filings/, at NASDAQ's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, NASDAQ included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. NASDAQ has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Each company listing common stock or voting preferred stock, and their equivalents, must hold an annual meeting of shareholders no later than one year after the end of the company's fiscal year and solicit proxies for that meeting.\3\ An annual meeting allows the equity owners of the company the opportunity to elect directors and meet with management to discuss company affairs. Currently, should a company fail to hold its annual meeting as required by Rule 5620, staff of the Listing Qualifications Department (``Staff'') has no discretion to allow additional time for the company to regain compliance. Rather, Staff is required by Rule 5810(c)(1) to issue a delisting determination, subjecting the company to immediate suspension and delisting unless the company appeals to a Hearings Panel.\4\ NASDAQ proposes to amend Rule 5810(4), 5810(c), 5815(c) and 5820(d) to provide Staff with limited discretion to grant a listed company that failed to hold its annual meeting of shareholders an extension of time to comply with the requirement.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Rules 5620(a) and (b), respectively. Rule 5615(a)(4)(D) also requires a limited partnership to hold an annual meeting of limited partners if required by statute or regulation in the state in which the limited partnership is formed or doing business or by the terms of the partnership's limited partnership agreement. Rule 5615(a)(4)(F) requires the limited partnership to distribute information statements or proxies when a meeting of limited partners is required. The proposed process described herein would apply in the identical manner to limited partnerships required to hold a meeting as it does to other companies. See also Rules 5615(a)(4)(E) and (F) (partner meetings and proxy solicitation of limited partnerships). \4\ A listed company may request review of a Staff Delisting Determination by a Hearings Panel. A timely request for a hearing will stay the suspension and delisting pending the issuance of a written Panel Decision. See Rule 5815. \5\ The Exchange notes that companies and certain limited partnerships are also required to solicit proxies and provide proxy statements for all meetings of shareholders or partners. See Rules 5620(b) and 5615(a)(4)(F), respectively. A company or limited partnership that has not timely held an annual meeting has not violated the proxy solicitation rule because no meeting has been held. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NASDAQ notes that the only other rule where a company is subject to immediate suspension and delisting, besides when it fails to solicit proxies and hold an annual meeting, is when Staff makes a determination pursuant to the Rule 5100 Series that the company's continued listing raises a public interest concern. This determination generally is made only following discussion and review of the facts and circumstances with the company. For all other deficiencies under the Rule 5000 Series, a listed company is provided with either a fixed compliance period within which to regain compliance,\6\ or given the opportunity to submit a plan to regain compliance, which Staff reviews to determine whether to grant the company a limited time to implement.\7\ Generally, a company is allowed 45 days to submit the plan of compliance \8\ and, upon review of the plan, Staff may grant the company up to 180 days from the date of Staff's initial notification of the company's non- compliance to regain compliance. If upon review of the company's plan Staff determines that an extension is not warranted, Staff will issue a Delisting Determination, which triggers the company's right to request review by a Hearings Panel. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Rule 5810(c)(3). \7\ See Rule 5810(c)(2). \8\ Companies deficient with the filing requirement for periodic reports are provided up to 60 days to submit a plan of compliance. See Rule 5810(c)(2)(F). Staff can shorten these deadlines where deemed appropriate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- There are a variety of reasons a company may fail to timely hold an annual meeting. In many of these cases, the circumstances that precipitated the delay may arise just before a planned meeting. For example, NASDAQ has [[Page 81574]] observed cases where a company has attempted to hold an annual meeting before the deadline, but was required to adjourn and reschedule the meeting to allow its shareholders more time to review proxy materials in connection with a shareholder proxy contest. NASDAQ has also encountered companies that could not hold an annual meeting because they were delinquent in filing periodic reports and therefore could not include required financial information in a proxy statement. In that case, under the current rules, the company could receive an extension of the time to regain compliance with the filing requirement. However, if during any such compliance period the company subsequently fails to hold an annual meeting of shareholders for any reason, Staff would issue a delist determination at that time for both the filing delinquency and the annual meeting deficiency, notwithstanding that the compliance period for the filing delinquency has not expired.\9\. [sic] Under these circumstances, as required by the Listing Rules, Staff will notify the company in writing of the annual meeting deficiency \10\ and the company must publicly disclose such notification.\11\ The deficiency will then be considered at the same time and together with the filing delinquency in any subsequent delisting proceeding.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Rule 5810(c)(2)(A). \10\ See Rule 5810(a). \11\ See Rule 5810(b). \12\ See Rule 5810(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For these reasons, NASDAQ is proposing to amend Rules 5810(c), 5815(c) and 5820(d) to afford those companies and limited partnerships that fail to hold an annual meeting in accordance with the listing rules an opportunity to submit a plan of compliance for Staff's review.\13\ Accordingly, we are also proposing to modify Rule 5810(4) to make clear that a Public Reprimand Letter is not an available notification type for unresolved deficiencies from the standards of Rules 5250(c) (obligation to file periodic financial reports), 5615(a)(4)(D) (partner meetings of limited partnerships), and 5620(a) (meetings of shareholders). Under proposed Rule 5810(c)(2)(G), Staff's written deficiency notice shall provide the Company with 45 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance. A non-compliant company will have to publicly disclose, under both Commission and NASDAQ rules, that it has received notification of non-compliance with the annual meeting rule.\14\ In addition, we are proposing to modify Rule 5810(c)(2)(B) to make clear that annual meeting deficiencies are governed by proposed Rule 5810(c)(2)(G). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ As noted above, the company or limited partnership generally would have 45 days to submit a plan to regain compliance, although Staff could shorten that period where it believes appropriate. \14\ See Rule 5810(b) and IM-5810-1. See also Item 3.01 of SEC Form 8-K. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In determining whether to grant the Company an extension to comply with the annual meeting requirement, Staff will consider the likelihood that the Company would be able to hold an annual meeting within the exception period, the Company's past compliance history, the reasons for the failure to timely hold an annual meeting, corporate events that may occur within the exception period, the Company's general financial status, and the Company's disclosures to the market. This review will be based on information provided by a variety of sources, which may include the Company, its audit committee, its outside auditors, the staff of the SEC and any other regulatory body. The proposed rule change will limit the length of an extension granted by Staff, upon review of the plan, to no more than 180 calendar days from the deadline to hold the annual meeting (i.e., one year after the end of the Company's fiscal year).\15\ The proposed rule change will also limit the maximum length of an extension that a NASDAQ Hearings Panel or the NASDAQ Listing and Hearing Review Council \16\ may grant for such a deficiency to no more than 360 calendar days from the date of non- compliance with the rule. In doing so, the total time that a company may be granted to regain compliance with the annual meeting requirement is unchanged from the existing rule.\17\ The proposed rule change merely vests Staff with the limited discretion to grant an extension to regain compliance for a prescribed portion of this time. NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule change provides consistency with the administration of other continued listing standards where companies are provided a cure period or opportunity to submit a plan to regain compliance after they become deficient, without undermining the requirement that NASDAQ-listed companies hold annual meetings. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ NASDAQ has observed that a substantial majority of companies that received delisting notices for failing to solicit proxies and hold their annual meetings regain compliance within a six month period. \16\ The Hearings Panel reviews staff delisting determinations and the Listing and Hearing Review Council reviews Panel Decisions. \17\ Under the current rule, the 360 calendar day limit on extensions starts on the date of Staff's written notification to a company of the deficiency, which is typically the first business day of a calendar year for companies with calendar year fiscal years. Under the proposed rule, the 360 calendar day period would start on the deadline to hold the annual meeting, which is one year after the end of a company's fiscal year. Thus, while the proposal does not change the total length of an extension a company may be granted, the starting date for an extension period under the proposed rule would be a day or two earlier than under the current rule. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lastly, in accordance with Rule 5810(c)(2) a company or limited partnership not subject to the all-inclusive annual fee program that submits such a plan is subject to the $5,000 compliance plan review fee. Effective January 2018, all companies will be subject to the all- inclusive annual fee program and this fee will no longer be applicable to any company. Further, all companies, regardless of whether they participate in the all-inclusive annual fee program or not, are subject to the $10,000 fee for each of a Panel hearing and appeal to the Listing and Hearing Review Council set forth in Listing Rules 5815(a)(3) and 5820(a), respectively. Accordingly, under the proposed rule as compared to the current rule, companies and limited partnerships may be subject to these fees at different times, if at all, depending on whether and when they regain compliance. Notwithstanding, a company that elects not to participate in the all- inclusive annual fee program prior to January 2018 will incur the $5,000 compliance plan review fee whereas a company that has opted-in to the all-inclusive fee will not. This fee would be in addition to any fees incurred in the appellate process. 2. Statutory Basis NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\18\ in general, and with Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\19\ in particular, in that they provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system which the Exchange operates or controls, and is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect [[Page 81575]] investors and the public interest; and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specifically, the proposed changes are consistent with these requirements because they permit Staff to grant additional time to a company to comply with the annual meeting requirement in limited situations after Staff review of a compliance plan. The proposed changes, however, do not change the total length of an extension a company may be granted--as is the case under the current rule, such maximum time period would remain 360 calendar days. Furthermore, as is the case under the current rule, a company notified that it is deficient in the annual meeting requirement is required to publicly disclose such notice and the rules basis for it. NASDAQ also separately publicly discloses a list of noncompliant companies and the listing standards with which they do not comply. For these reasons, the proposed rule protects investors and the public interest. As noted above, there are various reasons why a company may not be able to hold an annual meeting and for which immediate delisting is an inappropriate outcome under the circumstances. In lieu of the current requirement that Staff send an immediate Delisting Determination, the proposal vests Staff with discretion to determine whether the reason for the deficiency and the plan to regain compliance merit an extension. The Rules allow Staff such discretion for other deficiencies, and the only case where Staff sends an immediate Delisting Determination is where Staff has concluded, after review of the facts and circumstances, that continued listing is contrary to the public interest. NASDAQ believes that it is consistent with the Act to provide Staff with discretion to grant an extension for an annual meeting deficiency based on a plan of compliance, consistent with the process currently used for the majority of deficiencies under NASDAQ's rules. The Exchange is not extending the total time that a company may remain listed on NASDAQ while deficient; rather, the proposed rule change will allow Staff limited discretion to grant an extension to regain compliance with the listing standard for a prescribed portion of this time, which, to the extent exercised, will limit the length of time a Hearings Panel and Listing and Hearing Review Council may subsequently grant. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposal promotes the requirements of the Act by providing Staff with limited discretion to allow additional time where the circumstances do not support immediate delisting, while maintaining Staff's authority to delist a company when warranted. The Exchange also believes that assessing the $5,000 compliance plan review fee on companies that have not opted-in to the all- inclusive annual fee program prior to January 2018 is reasonable because NASDAQ is changing the process in an effort to make it more consistent with how other deficiencies are handled. The Exchange notes that companies that do not resolve their annual meeting deficiencies during an extension period provided by Staff under the proposed changes may subsequently be subject to the $10,000 fee for each of a Panel Hearing and an appeal to the Listing and Hearing Review Council. However, because most companies resolve annual meeting deficiencies within six months, under the proposed rules, they would likely not incur these fees. Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is equitably allocated because the fees assessed to companies as a result of the changes will be allocated uniformly among similarly- situated companies. Moreover, the Exchange believes that assessing different fees between companies that opt-in to the all-inclusive annual fee program and those that do not is an equitable allocation because participation in the program is elective and available to all listed companies. As a consequence, companies are able to weigh the benefits of the program against the relative risk of incurring additional fees and choose whether opting-in to the program at this juncture is appropriate. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The proposed rule change will not burden competition as it provides discretion to Staff to provide a limited time to regain compliance when immediate delisting is not warranted, thereby potentially reducing the time and costs associated with appealing a delisting determination. Moreover, the proposed rule change is intended to promote consistent and fair regulation, and is not being adopted for competitive purposes. To the extent a competitor marketplace believes that the proposed rule change places them at a competitive disadvantage, it may file with the Commission a proposed rule change to adopt the same or similar rule. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-144 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-144. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the [[Page 81576]] provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-144, and should be submitted on or before January 20, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\20\ Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-32647 Filed 12-29-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2015 / Notices 81573
Commission, and all written proposed rule change from interested for the company to regain compliance.
communications relating to the persons. Rather, Staff is required by Rule
proposed rule change between the 5810(c)(1) to issue a delisting
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Commission and any person, other than determination, subjecting the company
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
those that may be withheld from the to immediate suspension and delisting
the Proposed Rule Change
public in accordance with the unless the company appeals to a
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be NASDAQ proposes to amend Rule Hearings Panel.4 NASDAQ proposes to
available for Web site viewing and 5810(c) to provide NASDAQ staff with amend Rule 5810(4), 5810(c), 5815(c)
printing in the Commission’s Public limited discretion to grant a listed and 5820(d) to provide Staff with
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., company additional time to solicit limited discretion to grant a listed
Washington, DC 20549, on official proxies and hold an annual meeting of company that failed to hold its annual
business days between the hours of shareholders. The text of the proposed meeting of shareholders an extension of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the rule change is available from NASDAQ’s time to comply with the requirement.5
filing also will be available for Web site at http:// NASDAQ notes that the only other
inspection and copying at the principal nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/Filings/, at rule where a company is subject to
office of the Exchange. All comments NASDAQ’s principal office, and at the immediate suspension and delisting,
received will be posted without change; Commission’s Public Reference Room. besides when it fails to solicit proxies
the Commission does not edit personal and hold an annual meeting, is when
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Staff makes a determination pursuant to
identifying information from Statement of the Purpose of, and
submissions. You should submit only the Rule 5100 Series that the company’s
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule continued listing raises a public interest
information that you wish to make Change
available publicly. All submissions concern. This determination generally is
should refer to File Number SR– In its filing with the Commission, made only following discussion and
NYSEArca–2015–107 and should be NASDAQ included statements review of the facts and circumstances
submitted on or before January 20, 2016. concerning the purpose of and basis for with the company. For all other
the proposed rule change and discussed deficiencies under the Rule 5000 Series,
For the Commission, by the Division of any comments it received on the a listed company is provided with either
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.34
proposed rule change. The text of these a fixed compliance period within which
statements may be examined at the to regain compliance,6 or given the
Brent J. Fields,
places specified in Item IV below. opportunity to submit a plan to regain
Secretary. NASDAQ has prepared summaries, set compliance, which Staff reviews to
[FR Doc. 2015–32821 Filed 12–29–15; 8:45 am] forth in sections A, B, and C below, of determine whether to grant the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P the most significant aspects of such company a limited time to implement.7
statements. Generally, a company is allowed 45
days to submit the plan of compliance 8
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
and, upon review of the plan, Staff may
COMMISSION Statement of the Purpose of, and
grant the company up to 180 days from
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
[Release No. 34–76731; File No. SR– the date of Staff’s initial notification of
Change
NASDAQ–2015–144] the company’s non-compliance to regain
1. Purpose compliance. If upon review of the
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Each company listing common stock company’s plan Staff determines that an
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of or voting preferred stock, and their extension is not warranted, Staff will
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To equivalents, must hold an annual issue a Delisting Determination, which
Amend Rules 5810(4), 5810(c), 5815(c) meeting of shareholders no later than triggers the company’s right to request
and 5820(d) To Provide Staff With one year after the end of the company’s review by a Hearings Panel.
Limited Discretion To Grant a Listed fiscal year and solicit proxies for that There are a variety of reasons a
Company That Failed To Hold Its meeting.3 An annual meeting allows the company may fail to timely hold an
Annual Meeting of Shareholders an equity owners of the company the annual meeting. In many of these cases,
Extension of Time To Comply With the opportunity to elect directors and meet the circumstances that precipitated the
Requirement with management to discuss company delay may arise just before a planned
affairs. Currently, should a company fail meeting. For example, NASDAQ has
December 22, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the to hold its annual meeting as required 4 A listed company may request review of a Staff
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by Rule 5620, staff of the Listing Delisting Determination by a Hearings Panel. A
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 Qualifications Department (‘‘Staff’’) has timely request for a hearing will stay the suspension
notice is hereby given that on December no discretion to allow additional time and delisting pending the issuance of a written
Panel Decision. See Rule 5815.
9, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market 5 The Exchange notes that companies and certain
3 See Rules 5620(a) and (b), respectively. Rule
LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed limited partnerships are also required to solicit
5615(a)(4)(D) also requires a limited partnership to
with the Securities and Exchange hold an annual meeting of limited partners if proxies and provide proxy statements for all
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the required by statute or regulation in the state in meetings of shareholders or partners. See Rules
5620(b) and 5615(a)(4)(F), respectively. A company
proposed rule change as described in which the limited partnership is formed or doing
or limited partnership that has not timely held an
business or by the terms of the partnership’s limited
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items annual meeting has not violated the proxy
partnership agreement. Rule 5615(a)(4)(F) requires
have been prepared by the Exchange. the limited partnership to distribute information solicitation rule because no meeting has been held.
The Commission is publishing this statements or proxies when a meeting of limited
6 See Rule 5810(c)(3).
7 See Rule 5810(c)(2).
notice to solicit comments on the partners is required. The proposed process
described herein would apply in the identical 8 Companies deficient with the filing requirement
manner to limited partnerships required to hold a for periodic reports are provided up to 60 days to
34 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). meeting as it does to other companies. See also submit a plan of compliance. See Rule
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Rules 5615(a)(4)(E) and (F) (partner meetings and 5810(c)(2)(F). Staff can shorten these deadlines
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. proxy solicitation of limited partnerships). where deemed appropriate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 Dec 29, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_81823/page/1.svg)
![81574 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2015 / Notices
observed cases where a company has has received notification of non- portion of this time. NASDAQ believes
attempted to hold an annual meeting compliance with the annual meeting that the proposed rule change provides
before the deadline, but was required to rule.14 In addition, we are proposing to consistency with the administration of
adjourn and reschedule the meeting to modify Rule 5810(c)(2)(B) to make clear other continued listing standards where
allow its shareholders more time to that annual meeting deficiencies are companies are provided a cure period or
review proxy materials in connection governed by proposed Rule opportunity to submit a plan to regain
with a shareholder proxy contest. 5810(c)(2)(G). compliance after they become deficient,
NASDAQ has also encountered In determining whether to grant the without undermining the requirement
companies that could not hold an Company an extension to comply with that NASDAQ-listed companies hold
annual meeting because they were the annual meeting requirement, Staff annual meetings.
delinquent in filing periodic reports and will consider the likelihood that the Lastly, in accordance with Rule
therefore could not include required Company would be able to hold an 5810(c)(2) a company or limited
financial information in a proxy annual meeting within the exception partnership not subject to the all-
statement. In that case, under the period, the Company’s past compliance inclusive annual fee program that
current rules, the company could history, the reasons for the failure to submits such a plan is subject to the
receive an extension of the time to timely hold an annual meeting, $5,000 compliance plan review fee.
regain compliance with the filing corporate events that may occur within Effective January 2018, all companies
requirement. However, if during any the exception period, the Company’s will be subject to the all-inclusive
such compliance period the company general financial status, and the annual fee program and this fee will no
subsequently fails to hold an annual Company’s disclosures to the market. longer be applicable to any company.
meeting of shareholders for any reason, This review will be based on Further, all companies, regardless of
Staff would issue a delist determination information provided by a variety of whether they participate in the all-
at that time for both the filing sources, which may include the inclusive annual fee program or not, are
delinquency and the annual meeting Company, its audit committee, its subject to the $10,000 fee for each of a
deficiency, notwithstanding that the outside auditors, the staff of the SEC Panel hearing and appeal to the Listing
compliance period for the filing and any other regulatory body. The and Hearing Review Council set forth in
delinquency has not expired.9. [sic] proposed rule change will limit the Listing Rules 5815(a)(3) and 5820(a),
Under these circumstances, as required length of an extension granted by Staff, respectively. Accordingly, under the
by the Listing Rules, Staff will notify the upon review of the plan, to no more proposed rule as compared to the
company in writing of the annual than 180 calendar days from the current rule, companies and limited
meeting deficiency 10 and the company deadline to hold the annual meeting partnerships may be subject to these
must publicly disclose such (i.e., one year after the end of the fees at different times, if at all,
notification.11 The deficiency will then Company’s fiscal year).15 The proposed depending on whether and when they
be considered at the same time and rule change will also limit the regain compliance. Notwithstanding, a
together with the filing delinquency in maximum length of an extension that a company that elects not to participate in
any subsequent delisting proceeding.12 NASDAQ Hearings Panel or the the all-inclusive annual fee program
For these reasons, NASDAQ is NASDAQ Listing and Hearing Review prior to January 2018 will incur the
proposing to amend Rules 5810(c), Council 16 may grant for such a $5,000 compliance plan review fee
5815(c) and 5820(d) to afford those deficiency to no more than 360 calendar whereas a company that has opted-in to
companies and limited partnerships that days from the date of non-compliance the all-inclusive fee will not. This fee
fail to hold an annual meeting in with the rule. In doing so, the total time would be in addition to any fees
accordance with the listing rules an that a company may be granted to regain incurred in the appellate process.
opportunity to submit a plan of compliance with the annual meeting
2. Statutory Basis
compliance for Staff’s review.13 requirement is unchanged from the
Accordingly, we are also proposing to existing rule.17 The proposed rule NASDAQ believes that the proposed
modify Rule 5810(4) to make clear that change merely vests Staff with the rule changes are consistent with the
a Public Reprimand Letter is not an limited discretion to grant an extension provisions of Section 6 of the Act,18 in
available notification type for to regain compliance for a prescribed general, and with Sections 6(b)(4) and
unresolved deficiencies from the 6(b)(5) of the Act,19 in particular, in that
standards of Rules 5250(c) (obligation to 14 See Rule 5810(b) and IM–5810–1. See also Item they provide for the equitable allocation
file periodic financial reports), 3.01 of SEC Form 8–K. of reasonable dues, fees and other
15 NASDAQ has observed that a substantial
5615(a)(4)(D) (partner meetings of charges among members and issuers and
majority of companies that received delisting
limited partnerships), and 5620(a) notices for failing to solicit proxies and hold their
other persons using any facility or
(meetings of shareholders). Under annual meetings regain compliance within a six system which the Exchange operates or
proposed Rule 5810(c)(2)(G), Staff’s month period. controls, and is designed to prevent
written deficiency notice shall provide 16 The Hearings Panel reviews staff delisting
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
the Company with 45 calendar days to determinations and the Listing and Hearing Review practices, to promote just and equitable
Council reviews Panel Decisions.
submit a plan to regain compliance. A 17 Under the current rule, the 360 calendar day
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
non-compliant company will have to limit on extensions starts on the date of Staff’s and coordination with persons engaged
publicly disclose, under both written notification to a company of the deficiency, in regulating, clearing, settling,
Commission and NASDAQ rules, that it which is typically the first business day of a processing information with respect to,
calendar year for companies with calendar year
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
fiscal years. Under the proposed rule, the 360
and facilitating transactions in
9 See Rule 5810(c)(2)(A). calendar day period would start on the deadline to securities, to remove impediments to
10 See Rule 5810(a). hold the annual meeting, which is one year after the and perfect the mechanism of a free and
11 See Rule 5810(b).
end of a company’s fiscal year. Thus, while the open market and a national market
12 See Rule 5810(d).
proposal does not change the total length of an
13 As noted above, the company or limited extension a company may be granted, the starting
system, and, in general, to protect
partnership generally would have 45 days to submit date for an extension period under the proposed
18 15 U.S.C. 78f.
a plan to regain compliance, although Staff could rule would be a day or two earlier than under the
shorten that period where it believes appropriate. current rule. 19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 Dec 29, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_81823/page/2.svg)
![81576 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2015 / Notices
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Electronic Statements Dated: December 23, 2015.
available for Web site viewing and Brent J. Fields,
printing in the Commission’s Public D Use the Commission’s Internet Secretary.
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., submission form (http://www.sec.gov/
[FR Doc. 2015–32806 Filed 12–29–15; 8:45 am]
Washington, DC 20549 on official rules/other.shtml); or
BILLING CODE P
business days between the hours of D Send an email message to rules-
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such comments@sec.gov. Please include File
filing also will be available for No. 265–28 on the subject line; or SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
inspection and copying at the principal COMMISSION
office of the Exchange. All comments Paper Statements
received will be posted without change; [Release No. 34–76770; File No. SR–Phlx–
D Send paper statements to Brent J. 2015–110]
the Commission does not edit personal Fields, Secretary, Securities and
identifying information from Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Self-Regulatory Organizations;
submissions. You should submit only Washington, DC 20549–1090. NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
information that you wish to make Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
available publicly. All submissions All submissions should refer to File No.
Proposed Rule Change Regarding
should refer to File Number SR– 265–28. This file number should be
NASDAQ Last Sale Plus
NASDAQ–2015–144, and should be included on the subject line if email is
submitted on or before January 20, 2016. used. To help us process and review December 24, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of your statement more efficiently, please Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated use only one method. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
authority.20 Statements also will be available for (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
Brent J. Fields, Web site viewing and printing in the notice is hereby given that on December
Secretary. Commission’s Public Reference Room, 17, 2015, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
100 F Street NE., Room 1580, (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
[FR Doc. 2015–32647 Filed 12–29–15; 8:45 am]
Washington, DC 20549, on official Securities and Exchange Commission
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
business days between the hours of (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. All statements
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE II, below, which Items have been
received will be posted without change;
COMMISSION prepared by the Exchange. The
we do not edit personal identifying
Commission is publishing this notice to
information from submissions. You
solicit comments on the proposed rule
[Release Nos. 33–10000; 34–76762; File No. should submit only information that
change from interested persons.
265–28] you wish to make available publicly.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Investor Advisory Committee Meeting Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Marc Oorloff Sharma, Senior Special
the Proposed Rule Change
AGENCY:Securities and Exchange Counsel, Office of the Investor
Advocate, at (202) 551–3302, Securities The Exchange proposes to amend
Commission.
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street Chapter VIII of NASDAQ OMX PSX
ACTION: Notice of Meeting of Securities NE., Washington, DC 20549. Fees (‘‘PSX Chapter VIII’’), in the
and Exchange Commission Dodd-Frank section entitled PSX Last Sale Data
Investor Advisory Committee. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Feeds and NASDAQ Last Sale Plus Data
meeting will be open to the public, Feeds (‘‘Last Sale’’), with language
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange except during that portion of the regarding NASDAQ Last Sale (‘‘NLS’’)
Commission Investor Advisory meeting reserved for an administrative Plus (‘‘NLS Plus’’), a comprehensive
Committee, established pursuant to work session during lunch. Persons data feed offered by NASDAQ OMX
Section 911 of the Dodd-Frank Wall needing special accommodations to take Information LLC 3 that allows data
Street Reform and Consumer Protection part because of a disability should distributors to access the three last sale
Act of 2010, is providing notice that it notify the contact person listed in FOR products offered by each of Nasdaq,
will hold a public meeting. The public FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Inc.’s three U.S. equity markets.4
is invited to submit written statements The agenda for the meeting includes:
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
to the Committee. Remarks from Commissioners; a
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
discussion of fixed income market
DATES: The meeting will be held on 3 NASDAQ OMX Information LLC is a subsidiary
structure and pre-trade price
Thursday, January 21, 2016 from 10:00 of Nasdaq, Inc. (formerly, The NASDAQ OMX
a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (ET). Written transparency; a discussion of a draft Group, Inc.), separate and apart from The NASDAQ
statements should be received on or letter from the Investor as Owner Stock Market LLC. The primary purpose of
subcommittee regarding Financial NASDAQ OMX Information LLC is to combine
before January 21, 2016. publicly available data from the three filed last sale
Accounting Standards Board proposed products of the exchange subsidiaries of Nasdaq,
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in amendments to the Statement of Inc. and from the network processors for the ease
Multi-Purpose Room LL–006 at the Financial Accounting Concepts and and convenience of market data users and vendors,
Commission’s headquarters, 100 F and ultimately the investing public. In that role, the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notes to Financial Statements
function of NASDAQ OMX Information LLC is
Street NE., Washington, DC 20549. The concerning disclosure materiality; an analogous to that of other market data vendors, and
meeting will be webcast on the update on crowdfunding rules; a it has no competitive advantage over other market
Commission’s Web site at www.sec.gov. discussion of NASDAQ listing data vendors; NASDAQ OMX Information LLC
Written statements may be submitted by standards—shareholder approval rules; performs precisely the same functions as
Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, and other market
any of the following methods: subcommittee reports; and a nonpublic data vendors.
administrative work session during 4 The Nasdaq, Inc. U.S. equity markets include
20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). lunch. the Exchange, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:00 Dec 29, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_81823/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-30 03:15:54
Document Modified: 2015-12-30 03:15:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 81573 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR