80_FR_82107 80 FR 81856 - Notice of Availability of the Final White-Tailed Deer Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Fire Island National Seashore, New York

80 FR 81856 - Notice of Availability of the Final White-Tailed Deer Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Fire Island National Seashore, New York

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 251 (December 31, 2015)

Page Range81856-81857
FR Document2015-32970

The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of the Final White-tailed Deer Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Final Plan/EIS) for Fire Island National Seashore, New York. The Final Plan/EIS identifies Alternative D as the NPS preferred alternative. When approved, the management plan will guide management of white-tailed deer at Fire Island National Seashore through the use of integrated tools and strategies to control the deer population and support preservation of the natural and cultural landscape, protection and restoration of native vegetation and other natural and cultural resources.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81856-81857]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32970]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-NER-FIIS-18941; PXXNR5E2150001]


Notice of Availability of the Final White-Tailed Deer Management 
Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Fire Island National Seashore, 
New York

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of 
the Final White-tailed Deer Management Plan and Environmental Impact 
Statement (Final Plan/EIS) for Fire Island National Seashore, New York. 
The Final Plan/EIS identifies Alternative D as the NPS preferred 
alternative. When approved, the management plan will guide management 
of white-tailed deer at Fire Island National Seashore through the use 
of integrated tools and strategies to control the deer population and 
support preservation of the natural and cultural landscape, protection 
and restoration of native vegetation and other natural and cultural 
resources.

DATES: The NPS will prepare a Record of Decision (ROD) no sooner than 
30 days following publication by the Environmental Protection Agency of 
a Notice of Availability of the Final Plan/EIS in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: The Final Plan/EIS is available electronically at http://www.parkplanning.nps.gov/fiis. A limited number of printed copies will 
be available upon request by contacting the Superintendent's office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Morgan Elmer, NPS Denver Service 
Center, 303-969-2317, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fire Island National Seashore (the 
Seashore), a unit of the National Park System, is located along the 
south shore of Long Island in Suffolk County, New York. The Seashore 
encompasses 19,579 acres of upland, tidal, and submerged lands along a 
26-mile stretch of the 32-mile barrier island--part of a much larger 
system of barrier islands and bluffs stretching from New York City to 
the very eastern end of Long Island at

[[Page 81857]]

Montauk Point. The Seashore sustains a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus 
virginianus) population that has expanded since the late 1960s to the 
extent that impacts from high densities of deer have been, and continue 
to be, a complex issue for National Park Service (NPS) managers. As a 
result, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(NEPA), the Seashore prepared a Draft White-tailed Deer Management Plan 
and Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Plan/EIS) to develop a deer 
management strategy that supports preservation of the natural and 
cultural landscape through population management and the protection of 
native vegetation. The Draft Plan/EIS was prepared in cooperation with 
the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS-DEC) 
and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Services (APHIS).
    The NPS released the Draft Plan/EIS for public and agency review 
and comment beginning July 31, 2014 and ending October 10, 2014. The 
Draft Plan/EIS evaluated a no action alternative (A) and three action 
alternatives (B, C, and D). Each action alternative presented a 
different strategy to protect native plant communities and cultural 
plantings, promote forest regeneration, further reduce undesirable 
human-deer interactions, and reduce the deer population in the 
Seashore.
    Alternative A would continue existing deer management and 
monitoring efforts throughout the Seashore. These actions include 
continued public education/interpretation efforts, vegetation 
monitoring, and deer population and behavior surveys.
    Alternative B provides a nonlethal deer reduction option to 
implement nonsurgical reproductive control of does when an acceptable 
reproductive control agent is available that meets NPS established 
criteria. Large fence exclosures would also protect forested areas and 
vegetation to allow restoration of the maritime holly forest, other 
natural vegetation and the culturally important vegetation at the 
William Floyd Estate.
    Alternative C provides a lethal deer reduction option through the 
use of sharpshooting with firearms, and possible capture and euthanasia 
to reduce deer populations to the target density and maintain that 
level.
    Alternative D, identified as the NPS preferred alternative, 
provides a combined lethal and nonlethal deer reduction option through 
the use of sharpshooting with firearms, and possible capture and 
euthanasia to reduce deer populations to a desirable level. Once the 
target density has been reached, use of nonsurgical reproductive 
control of does may be used to maintain that level when an acceptable 
reproductive control agent is available that meets NPS established 
criteria.
    Comments were accepted on the Draft Plan/EIS during the 60-day 
public comment period. After reviewing and considering all comments 
received, the NPS has prepared this Final White-tailed Deer Management 
Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Final Plan/EIS). The Final 
Plan/EIS identifies Alternative D as the NPS preferred alternative with 
no changes from the Draft Plan/EIS and presents the likely 
environmental consequences of implementing the preferred alternative, 
as well as the other alternatives considered. The Final Plan/EIS also 
discusses the comments received on the Draft Plan/EIS and responds to 
substantive comments.

    Dated: August 5, 2015.
Michael A. Caldwell,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-32970 Filed 12-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-WV-P



                                              81856                     Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Notices

                                              the AFH with respect to another                         certify for information applicable only                 Dated: December 22, 2015.
                                              program participant.                                    to other collaborating program                        Gustavo Velasquez,
                                                 Through these regulatory provisions,                 participants’ analyses, if any.’’ HUD                 Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and
                                              HUD sets out the standard for review of                 believes this additional instruction will             Equal Opportunity.
                                              AFHs. HUD is further committed to                       provide greater clarity and further                   [FR Doc. 2015–32680 Filed 12–30–15; 8:45 am]
                                              providing technical assistance and                      encourage joint and regional AFH                      BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
                                              examples that will help guide program                   submissions.
                                              participants as to what it means to have
                                              an AFH that is substantially incomplete                   As the AFFH final rule itself makes
                                                                                                      clear, joint and regional submitting                  DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                              or one that is inconsistent with fair
                                              housing or civil rights laws. HUD can,                  agencies are both responsible for the                 National Park Service
                                              and will, provide a checklist to help                   joint portions of the Assessment,
                                                                                                      including joint goals, and for their own              [NPS–NER–FIIS–18941; PXXNR5E2150001]
                                              program participants ensure they have
                                              responded to all required elements of                   individual portions of the assessment,
                                                                                                                                                            Notice of Availability of the Final
                                              the Assessment Tool.                                    including their agencies individual                   White-Tailed Deer Management Plan
                                                 Issue: The certification statement for               goals and priorities. They are therefore              and Environmental Impact Statement,
                                              the Assessment Tool is too broad. A                     not responsible for other agencies’                   Fire Island National Seashore, New
                                              commenter stated that it is unreasonable                individual goals and priorities. As                   York
                                              to require broad certification of AFFH                  stated in § 5.156 (a)(3) of the AFFH final
                                              compliance without providing program                    rule:                                                 AGENCY:   National Park Service, Interior.
                                              participants with the standards HUD                                                                           ACTION:   Notice of availability.
                                                                                                        Collaborating program participants must
                                              will use to assess that compliance.
                                                                                                      designate, through express written consent,           SUMMARY:    The National Park Service
                                              Another commenter suggested that HUD
                                                                                                      one participant as the lead entity to oversee         (NPS) announces the availability of the
                                              revise the certification language to read,
                                                                                                      the submission of the joint or regional AFH           Final White-tailed Deer Management
                                              ‘‘All information provided by the
                                                                                                      on behalf of all collaborating program                Plan and Environmental Impact
                                              signatory entity in this assessment is                  participants. When collaborating to submit a
                                              true, complete, and accurate to the best                                                                      Statement (Final Plan/EIS) for Fire
                                                                                                      joint or regional AFH, program participants           Island National Seashore, New York.
                                              of my knowledge and belief as of the                    may divide work as they choose, but all
                                              date of this submission.’’ The                                                                                The Final Plan/EIS identifies
                                                                                                      program participants are accountable for the          Alternative D as the NPS preferred
                                              commenter stated that this will better                  analysis and any joint goals and priorities,
                                              facilitate submissions for program                                                                            alternative. When approved, the
                                                                                                      and each collaborating program participant            management plan will guide
                                              participants that will submit a single                  must sign the AFH submitted to HUD.
                                              AFH on behalf of multiple agencies.                                                                           management of white-tailed deer at Fire
                                                                                                      Collaborating program participants are also           Island National Seashore through the
                                                 HUD Response: Several changes were                   accountable for their individual analysis,
                                              made to both the certification language                                                                       use of integrated tools and strategies to
                                                                                                      goals, and priorities to be included in the
                                              itself to align it with the certification                                                                     control the deer population and support
                                                                                                      collaborative AFH.
                                              provisions in the AFFH final rule and                                                                         preservation of the natural and cultural
                                              clarifying language was also added to                     HUD encourages program participants                 landscape, protection and restoration of
                                              the instructions accompanying the                       to enter into joint and regional                      native vegetation and other natural and
                                              Assessment Tool that pertain to the                     collaborations. Doing so can have                     cultural resources.
                                              certification. First, a new item was                    benefits for both the analysis of issues,             DATES: The NPS will prepare a Record
                                              added to the certification, reflecting the              which often cross-jurisdictional                      of Decision (ROD) no sooner than 30
                                              AFFH final rule:                                        boundaries and for setting goals. HUD                 days following publication by the
                                                By this signature, I am authorized to certify         will work with all joint and regional                 Environmental Protection Agency of a
                                              on behalf of the program participant that the           participating entities to facilitate their            Notice of Availability of the Final Plan/
                                              program participant will take meaningful                cooperation and further clarify the roles             EIS in the Federal Register.
                                              actions to further the goals identified in its          and responsibilities of these agencies                ADDRESSES: The Final Plan/EIS is
                                              AFH conducted in accordance with the                                                                          available electronically at http://
                                              requirements in §§ 5.150 through 5.180 and
                                                                                                      through additional technical assistance
                                                                                                      and guidance documents.                               www.parkplanning.nps.gov/fiis. A
                                              24 CFR 91.225(a)(1), 91.325(a)(1),
                                              91.425(a)(1), 570.487(b)(1), 570.601, 903.7(o),
                                                                                                                                                            limited number of printed copies will be
                                                                                                      III. Summary                                          available upon request by contacting the
                                              and 903.15(d), as applicable.
                                                Second, an instruction was added for                                                                        Superintendent’s office.
                                                                                                        In issuing this Final Assessment Tool,
                                              the certification that states: ‘‘Please                                                                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                      HUD has strived to reach the
                                              note, for a joint or regional AFH, each                                                                       Morgan Elmer, NPS Denver Service
                                                                                                      appropriate balance in having program
                                              collaborating program participant must                                                                        Center, 303–969–2317, Morgan_Elmer@
                                                                                                      participants produce a meaningful                     nps.gov.
                                              authorize a representative to sign the                  assessment of fair housing that carefully
                                              certification on the program                            considers barriers to fair housing choice             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fire Island
                                              participant’s behalf. In a joint or                     and accessing opportunity and how                     National Seashore (the Seashore), a unit
                                              regional AFH, when responding to each                   such barriers can be overcome in                      of the National Park System, is located
                                              question, collaborating program                                                                               along the south shore of Long Island in
                                                                                                      respective jurisdictions and regions
                                              participants may provide joint analyses                                                                       Suffolk County, New York. The
                                                                                                      without being unduly burdensome.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                              and individual analyses. The authorized                                                                       Seashore encompasses 19,579 acres of
                                                                                                      HUD has further committed to
                                              representative of each program                                                                                upland, tidal, and submerged lands
                                              participant certifies only to information               addressing program participant burden                 along a 26-mile stretch of the 32-mile
                                              the program participant provides                        by providing data, guidance, and                      barrier island—part of a much larger
                                              individually or jointly in response to                  technical assistance, and such                        system of barrier islands and bluffs
                                              each question in the assessment. The                    assistance will occur throughout the                  stretching from New York City to the
                                              authorized representative does not                      AFH process.                                          very eastern end of Long Island at


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:49 Dec 30, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00052   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM   31DEN1


                                                                        Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Notices                                                81857

                                              Montauk Point. The Seashore sustains a                  reduce deer populations to a desirable                  Dated: December 28, 2015.
                                              white-tailed deer (Odocoileus                           level. Once the target density has been               Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
                                              virginianus) population that has                        reached, use of nonsurgical                           Rules Committee Secretary.
                                              expanded since the late 1960s to the                    reproductive control of does may be                   [FR Doc. 2015–32923 Filed 12–30–15; 8:45 am]
                                              extent that impacts from high densities                 used to maintain that level when an                   BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
                                              of deer have been, and continue to be,                  acceptable reproductive control agent is
                                              a complex issue for National Park                       available that meets NPS established
                                              Service (NPS) managers. As a result,                    criteria.                                             DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                              pursuant to the National Environmental                     Comments were accepted on the Draft
                                              Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Seashore                 Plan/EIS during the 60-day public                     Notice of Lodging of Proposed
                                              prepared a Draft White-tailed Deer                      comment period. After reviewing and                   Consent Decrees Under the Clean
                                              Management Plan and Environmental                       considering all comments received, the                Water Act
                                              Impact Statement (Draft Plan/EIS) to                    NPS has prepared this Final White-
                                              develop a deer management strategy                      tailed Deer Management Plan and                          On December 23, 2015, the
                                              that supports preservation of the natural                                                                     Department of Justice lodged two
                                                                                                      Environmental Impact Statement (Final
                                              and cultural landscape through                                                                                proposed consent decrees with the
                                                                                                      Plan/EIS). The Final Plan/EIS identifies
                                              population management and the                                                                                 United States District Court for the
                                                                                                      Alternative D as the NPS preferred
                                              protection of native vegetation. The                                                                          District of Puerto Rico in the lawsuit
                                                                                                      alternative with no changes from the
                                              Draft Plan/EIS was prepared in                                                                                entitled United States v. The
                                                                                                      Draft Plan/EIS and presents the likely
                                              cooperation with the New York State                                                                           Municipality of San Juan, the Puerto
                                                                                                      environmental consequences of
                                              Department of Environmental                                                                                   Rico Department of Natural and
                                                                                                      implementing the preferred alternative,
                                              Conservation (NYS–DEC) and the U.S.                                                                           Environmental Resources, the Puerto
                                                                                                      as well as the other alternatives
                                              Department of Agriculture (USDA)                                                                              Rico Department of Transportation and
                                                                                                      considered. The Final Plan/EIS also
                                              Animal and Plant Health Inspection                                                                            Public Works, the Puerto Rico Highway
                                                                                                      discusses the comments received on the                and Transportation Authority, and the
                                              Services (APHIS).                                       Draft Plan/EIS and responds to
                                                 The NPS released the Draft Plan/EIS                                                                        Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Civil
                                                                                                      substantive comments.                                 Action No. 3:14–cv–1476–CCC.
                                              for public and agency review and
                                              comment beginning July 31, 2014 and                       Dated: August 5, 2015.                                 One proposed consent decree resolves
                                              ending October 10, 2014. The Draft                      Michael A. Caldwell,                                  the United States’ claims against the
                                              Plan/EIS evaluated a no action                          Regional Director, Northeast Region, National         Puerto Rico Department of Natural and
                                              alternative (A) and three action                        Park Service.                                         Environmental Resources (‘‘DNER’’)
                                              alternatives (B, C, and D). Each action                 [FR Doc. 2015–32970 Filed 12–30–15; 8:45 am]          under the Clean Water Act (‘‘CWA’’), 33
                                              alternative presented a different strategy              BILLING CODE 4310–WV–P
                                                                                                                                                            U.S.C. 1251–1387, concerning CWA
                                              to protect native plant communities and                                                                       violations at three of its storm water
                                              cultural plantings, promote forest                                                                            pump stations located within San Juan.
                                              regeneration, further reduce undesirable                                                                      The proposed consent decree requires
                                              human-deer interactions, and reduce the                 JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE                            DNER to apply for a permit and
                                              deer population in the Seashore.                        UNITED STATES                                         implement a Storm Water Management
                                                 Alternative A would continue existing                                                                      Program, to undertake certain capital
                                              deer management and monitoring efforts                  Hearings of the Judicial Conference                   and operation improvements to its
                                              throughout the Seashore. These actions                  Advisory Committee on the Federal                     pump stations, and to provide financial
                                              include continued public education/                     Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure                         support for investigations and work
                                              interpretation efforts, vegetation                                                                            performed in the pump station service
                                                                                                      AGENCY:  Advisory Committee on the                    areas. The proposed consent decree
                                              monitoring, and deer population and
                                                                                                      Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,                resolves only the violations alleged
                                              behavior surveys.
                                                 Alternative B provides a nonlethal                   Judicial Conference of the United States.             against DNER in the Complaint through
                                              deer reduction option to implement                      ACTION: Notice of cancellation of public              the date of lodging of the consent decree
                                              nonsurgical reproductive control of does                hearing.                                              and does not resolve claims against the
                                              when an acceptable reproductive                                                                               other Defendants. Due to financial
                                              control agent is available that meets                   SUMMARY:  The following public hearing                challenges currently facing the
                                              NPS established criteria. Large fence                   on proposed amendments to the Federal                 Commonwealth, no civil penalties for
                                              exclosures would also protect forested                  Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been                past violations will be recovered under
                                              areas and vegetation to allow restoration               canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing on                 this consent decree.
                                              of the maritime holly forest, other                     January 22, 2016 in Washington, DC.                      The second proposed consent decree
                                              natural vegetation and the culturally                   Announcements for this meeting were                   resolves the United States’ claims
                                              important vegetation at the William                     previously published in 80 FR 48120, 80               against the Puerto Rico Department of
                                              Floyd Estate.                                           FR 50324 and 80 FR 51604. The public                  Transportation and Public Works
                                                 Alternative C provides a lethal deer                 hearing on proposed amendments to the                 (‘‘DTPW’’) and the Puerto Rico
                                              reduction option through the use of                     Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure                 Highways and Transportation Authority
                                              sharpshooting with firearms, and                        scheduled for January 29, 2016, in                    (‘‘HTA’’) under the CWA, concerning
                                              possible capture and euthanasia to                      Pasadena, California, remains                         CWA violations throughout their storm
                                              reduce deer populations to the target                   scheduled, subject to sufficient                      sewer systems located within San Juan.
                                                                                                      expressions of interest.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                              density and maintain that level.                                                                              The proposed consent decree provides
                                                 Alternative D, identified as the NPS                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      for injunctive relief to be implemented
                                              preferred alternative, provides a                       Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules                           in a two-stage, multi-phased approach
                                              combined lethal and nonlethal deer                      Committee Secretary, Rules Committee                  including the study and repair of their
                                              reduction option through the use of                     Support Office, Administrative Office of              MS4s, in addition to other infrastructure
                                              sharpshooting with firearms, and                        the United States Courts, Washington,                 and operational improvements. The
                                              possible capture and euthanasia to                      DC 20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.                   proposed consent decree resolves only


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:49 Dec 30, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00053   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM   31DEN1



Document Created: 2015-12-31 02:15:14
Document Modified: 2015-12-31 02:15:14
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of availability.
DatesThe NPS will prepare a Record of Decision (ROD) no sooner than 30 days following publication by the Environmental Protection Agency of a Notice of Availability of the Final Plan/EIS in the Federal Register.
ContactMorgan Elmer, NPS Denver Service Center, 303-969-2317, [email protected]
FR Citation80 FR 81856 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR