80 FR 8349 - Request for Letters of Intent To Apply for 2015 Technology Initiative Grant Funding

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 31 (February 17, 2015)

Page Range		8349-8352
FR Document		2015-03159
The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) is issuing this Notice to describe the conditions under which Letters of Intent will be received for the Technology Initiative Grant (TIG) program. LSC's TIG program was established in 2000. Since that time, LSC has made 570 grants totaling more than $46 million. This grant program provides an important tool to help achieve LSC's goal of increasing the quantity and quality of legal services available to eligible persons. Projects funded under the TIG program develop, test and replicate innovative technologies that can enable grant recipients and state justice communities to improve low-income persons' access to high quality legal assistance through an integrated and well managed technology system. When submitting Letters of Intent, applicants should consider the growth and continued development of technology and the resulting effects on the practice of law, program management and service delivery.
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8349-8352]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03159]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Request for Letters of Intent To Apply for 2015 Technology 
Initiative Grant Funding

AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.

[[Page 8350]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) is issuing this Notice to 
describe the conditions under which Letters of Intent will be received 
for the Technology Initiative Grant (TIG) program. LSC's TIG program 
was established in 2000. Since that time, LSC has made 570 grants 
totaling more than $46 million. This grant program provides an 
important tool to help achieve LSC's goal of increasing the quantity 
and quality of legal services available to eligible persons. Projects 
funded under the TIG program develop, test and replicate innovative 
technologies that can enable grant recipients and state justice 
communities to improve low-income persons' access to high quality legal 
assistance through an integrated and well managed technology system. 
When submitting Letters of Intent, applicants should consider the 
growth and continued development of technology and the resulting 
effects on the practice of law, program management and service 
delivery.

DATES: Letters of Intent must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 
20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Letters of Intent must be submitted electronically at http://lscgrants.lsc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Ribadeneyra, Program Analyst, 
Office of Program Performance, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K 
Street NW., Washington, DC, 20007; (202) 295-1554 (phone); 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

General Information

    All prospective applicants for 2015 funds from the Legal Services 
Corporation's (LSC) Technology Initiative Grant (TIG) program must 
submit a ``Letter of Intent'' (LOI) prior to submitting a formal 
application. The format and contents of a Letter of Intent should 
conform to the requirements specified below in Section IV.
    The submission of a LOI enables a prospective applicant to vet its 
project ideas with TIG staff, who can then identify those projects that 
have a reasonable chance of success in the competitive grant process. 
LSC will solicit full proposals for those projects that have a 
reasonable chance of success in the grant competition process based on 
LSC's analysis of the information provided in the LOI.

LSC Requirements

    Technology Initiative Grant funds are subject to all the 
requirements of the Legal Services Corporation Act of 1974, as amended 
(LSC Act), any applicable appropriations acts and any other applicable 
laws, rules, regulations, policies, guidelines, instructions, and other 
directives of the Legal Services Corporation (LSC), including, but not 
limited to, the LSC Audit Guide for Recipients and Auditors, the 
Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients (2010 Edition), the CSR Handbook 
(2011 Edition), the 1981 LSC Property Manual (as amended) and the 
Property Acquisition and Management Manual, with any amendments to the 
foregoing adopted before or during the period of the grant (see http://grants.lsc.gov/rin/grantee-guidance). Before submitting a Letter of 
Intent, applicants should be familiar with LSC's subgrant and transfer 
requirements at 45 CFR parts 1610 and 1627 (see http://www.lsc.gov/about/laws-regulations/lsc-regulations-cfr-45-part-1600-et-seq), 
particularly as they pertain to payments of LSC funds to other entities 
for programmatic activities.
    For additional information and resources regarding TIG compliance, 
including transfers, subgrants, third-party contracting, conflicts of 
interest, grant modification procedures, and special TIG grant 
assurances, see http://tig.lsc.gov/grants/compliance.

Eligible Applicants

    TIG awards are only available to current LSC basic field grant 
recipients. A TIG will not be awarded to any applicant unless the 
applicant is in good standing on any existing TIG projects. Applicants 
must be up to date according to the milestone schedule on all existing 
TIG projects prior to submitting a LOI or have requested and received 
an adjustment to the original milestone schedule.
    TIG grants will not be awarded to any applicant unless the 
applicant has made satisfactory progress on all TIG grants previously 
awarded to it and is not subject to any short-term funding (i.e., less 
than one year) on basic field grants. LSC recipients that have had a 
previous TIG terminated for failure to provide timely reports and 
submissions are not eligible to receive a TIG for three years after 
their earlier grant was terminated. This policy does not apply to 
applicants that worked with LSC to end a TIG early after an 
unsuccessful project implementation resulting from technology 
limitations, a failed proof of concept, or other reasons outside of the 
applicant's control.

Funding Availability

    LSC has received an appropriation of $4 million for fiscal year 
2015 to fund TIG projects. In 2014, 38 TIG projects received funding 
with a median funding amount of $75,270. (See http://tig.lsc.gov/grants/past-grant-awards for more information on past awards.) LSC 
recommends a minimum amount for TIG funding requests of $40,000, but 
lower requests will be considered. There is no maximum amount for TIG 
funding requests that are within the total appropriation for TIG.

Collaborations

    The TIG program encourages applicants to reach out to and include 
in TIG projects others interested in access to justice--the courts, bar 
associations, pro bono projects, libraries, and social service 
agencies. Partnerships can enhance the reach, effectiveness and 
sustainability of many projects.

Grant Categories

    LSC will accept projects in two application categories:

(1) Innovations and Improvements
(2) Replication and Adaptation

Grant Category 1: Innovations and Improvements

    The Innovations and Improvements Category is designated for 
projects that: (1) Implement new or innovative approaches for using 
technology in legal services, or (2) enhance the effectiveness and 
efficiency of existing technologies so that they may be better used to 
increase the quality and quantity of services to clients.
    Although there is no funding limit or matching requirement for 
applications in this category, additional weight is given to projects 
with strong support from partners. Proposals for initiatives with broad 
applicability and/or that would have impact throughout the legal 
services community are strongly encouraged. For applications that do 
not have broad applicability or impact, LSC will carefully consider the 
amount of the request and the balance of cost and potential benefit.

Grant Category 2: Replication and Adaptation

    The Replication and Adaptation category is for proposals that seek 
to replicate, adapt, or provide added value to the work of prior 
technology projects. This includes, but is not limited to, the 
implementation and improvement of tested methodologies and technologies 
from previous TIG projects. Applicants may also replicate technology 
projects funded outside of the TIG program, including sectors outside 
the legal aid community, such as other social services organizations, 
the broader non-

[[Page 8351]]

profit community, and the private sector.
    Project proposals in the Replication and Adaptation category may 
include, but are not limited to:

A: Replication of Previous TIG Projects

    During the past fifteen years of TIG funding, there have been many 
successes. A list of examples of replicable projects and final reports 
can be found at http://tig.lsc.gov/grants/final-reports/final-report-samples-replicable-projects. LSC requires that any original software 
developed with TIG funding be available to other legal services 
programs at little or no cost. Applicants should look to previous 
successful TIG projects and determine how they could be replicated at a 
reduced cost from the original project, and/or how they could be built 
upon and enhanced. Projects where original software or content has 
already been created lend themselves to replication, and LSC encourages 
programs to look to these projects to see how they could benefit the 
delivery systems in their state.

B: Automated Form Replication

    LawHelp Interactive (LHI \1\) is now deployed in 41 states. There 
are over 3,000 active HotDocs templates and A2J Author modules being 
hosted on the LawHelp Interactive National HotDocs Server at https://lawhelpinteractive.org. While there are differences from state to state 
in the content and format, many of these forms can be edited for use in 
other jurisdictions with less effort, hence a lower cost, than starting 
from scratch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ LHI is an automated document server powered by HotDocs 
Server and made available to any LSC funded program at no charge. 
See https://lawhelpinteractive.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Even if a form differs from one state to another, the information 
needed to populate a form will, for the most part, be similar (What are 
the names of the plaintiff, the defendant, the children, etc.?). This 
means the interviews are more easily replicated than templates. All of 
these templates and interviews are available to be modified as needed. 
Applicants should identify which forms and templates are to be adapted, 
and then estimate the cost to do this and compare that to the cost of 
developing them from scratch.
    LHI has the capacity to support Spanish, Vietnamese, Mandarin, and 
Korean language interviews. In addition, LHI has been integrated with 
other systems to allow the flow of information between LHI and court e-
filing systems, and legal aid case management systems. An ``Events'' 
feature is being developed that will enable pro bono programs from 
across a state to use LHI interviews and forms to assign pre-screened 
pro bono cases and their documents to panel attorneys. For additional 
information, including examples, best practices, models and training 
materials, see the LawHelp Interactive Resource Center hosted by Pro 
Bono Net at http://www.probono.net/dasupport (you may need to request a 
free membership to access this Web site).

C: Replication of Technology Projects in Other Sectors

    In addition to replicating other TIG funded technology projects, 
LSC encourages replication of proven technologies from non-LSC funded 
legal aid organizations as well as sectors outside the legal aid 
community. Ideas for replication may be found through resources and 
organizations such as LSNTAP, the ABA, international legal aid 
providers such as the Legal Services Society of British Columbia and 
HiiL's Innovating Justice project (http://www.innovatingjustice.com), 
Idealware (see the article on Unleashing Innovation), NTEN, and 
TechSoup.

III. Areas of Interest

    LSC welcomes applications for a wide variety of projects. For 2015, 
LSC has four areas of particular interest in which programs are 
encouraged to submit proposals for innovative technology approaches. 
The designation of these areas does not in any way limit the scope of 
proposals in which LSC is interested. The 2015 areas of particular 
interest are:
    A. Projects to Move Organizations Above the LSC Technology 
Baselines (revised 2015). The recently updated LSC Baselines: 
Technologies That Should Be in Place in a Legal Aid Office Today 
(revised 2015) provides a detailed overview of the technologies that 
enable modern legal aid offices to operate efficiently and effectively. 
While LSC's policy is that TIGs cannot be used to bring grantees up to 
the baselines in an area, we want to encourage applicants as they 
implement a baseline capacity to think about how they can do more than 
just the minimum. This area of interest is to encourage applicants to 
propose initiatives that advance their organizations beyond the 2015 
Baselines by developing innovative, creative technology solutions that 
address at least one capacity identified in the Baselines and then 
exceeding it. Also, grantees applying under this area of interest 
should address how their project could establish a new technology best 
practice that could be incorporated into future versions of the 
Baselines.
    B. Technology Tools to Facilitate Access to Substantive Law Across 
Jurisdictions. A variety of technologies have the potential to enhance 
access to legal information and resources related to substantive laws 
with a national reach. These resources may be especially valuable given 
that they would be applicable to clients and advocates across the 
country. In the past, LSC has had a similar area of interest for 
substantive federal laws because of their uniformity across 
jurisdictions. This area of interest includes state-specific laws that 
have similarities across states and as to which information, resources 
and tools can therefore be replicated across states. A good example of 
this is expungement. Tools built to facilitate the expungement process 
in one jurisdiction have been modified and successfully replicated in 
other jurisdictions. LSC wants to encourage grantees to expand this 
approach to other substantive areas of the law.
    C. Automated Navigators for Pro Se Litigants. Navigating the 
complexities of the court system can be a challenge for advocates, and 
even more so for low-income persons representing themselves. This area 
encourages development of personal case navigators for low-income 
litigants to remind them of due dates, monitor court dockets, advise 
them on trial preparations, and coach them on courtroom strategies. 
While grantees do not have the resources to assign a coach to each pro 
se litigant, technology offers the promise to build automated systems 
that can help serve this role.
    Some existing TIGs have started to explore such systems already 
using automated SMS reminders for appointments. This area of interest 
encourages grantees to take this concept to the next level by building 
systems specific to case types that use timelines and monitor court 
dockets to guide pro se litigants through the entire course of their 
cases. Once set up, the system would remind the user of important dates 
and direct them to resources such as automated forms and videos. With 
the cooperation of the court, the system could monitor the court docket 
to notify the users of hearing dates and, if pleadings were filed by 
the other side, alert users to the next steps needed to respond and 
deadlines.
    D. Innovations in Legal Information Design and Delivery. Content 
should be developed with the end user in mind, but too often the end 
result is a reflection of what the developer determines the end user 
will need,

[[Page 8352]]

rather than what the user determines he or she will best understand and 
find most helpful. Technology provides an opportunity to design and 
deliver legal information that is optimized for the end user. There are 
good examples of how user-centric design can improve legal innovation 
(see www.legaltechdesign.com and www.nulawlab.org). Projects in this 
area of interest could incorporate new approaches to visual law, online 
learning, user interaction and ``legal information literacy'' in the 
design and delivery of content. This could potentially focus on low/no-
literacy and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) communities or others 
who are traditionally under-served by traditional methods. 
Alternatively, a project could also improve the design and 
effectiveness of online training and substantive practice resources for 
advocates and volunteers.

IV. Specific Letter of Intent Requirements

One Project per Letter of Intent

    Applicants may submit multiple LOIs, but a separate LOI should be 
submitted for each project for which funding is sought.

Letter Requirements and Format

    Letters of Intent must be submitted using the online system at 
http://lscgrants.lsc.gov. Additional instructions and information can 
be found on the TIG Web site at http://tig.lsc.gov/grants/application-process. This system will walk you through the process of creating a 
simple two-page LOI. The LOI should concisely provide the following 
information about the proposed project:
    1. Category--select the appropriate category from the drop down 
list.
    2. Description of Project (maximum 2500 characters)--Briefly 
describe the basic elements of the project, including the specific 
technology(ies) the project will develop or implement; how they will be 
developed, how they will operate, the function they will serve within 
the legal services delivery system, their expected impact, and other 
similar factors. (Only the impact should be highlighted here; more 
details about the system's benefits should be provided below.)
    3. Major Benefits (maximum 2500 characters)--Describe the specific 
ways in which the project will increase or improve services to clients 
and/or enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of program operations. 
To the extent feasible, discuss both the qualitative and quantitative 
aspects of these benefits.
    4. Estimated Costs (maximum 1500 characters)--Start by stating the 
amount of funding you are seeking from the TIG program, followed by the 
estimated total project cost, summarizing the anticipated costs of the 
major components of the project. List anticipated contributions, both 
in-kind and monetary, from all partners involved in the project.
    5. Major Partners (maximum 1500 characters)--Identify organizations 
that are expected to be important partners. Specify the role(s) each 
partner will play.
    6. Innovation/Replication (maximum 1500 characters)--Identify how 
and why the proposed project is new and innovative and/or is a 
replication or adaptation of a previous technology project. Identify 
how and why the proposed project can significantly benefit and/or be 
replicated by other legal services providers and/or the legal services 
community at large.

Letter of Intent Deadline

    Letters of Intent must be completed and submitted into the online 
system at http://lscgrants.lsc.gov no later than 11:59 p.m. EDT, 
Friday, March 20, 2015. The online system may experience technical 
difficulties due to heavy traffic on the day of the deadline. 
Applicants are strongly encouraged to complete LOI submissions as early 
as possible.
    LSC will not accept applications submitted after the application 
deadline unless a waiver of the deadline has been approved in advance 
(see Waiver Authority). Therefore, allow sufficient time for online 
submission.
    LSC will provide confirmation via email upon the completed 
electronic submission of each Letter of Intent. Keep this email as 
verification that the program's LOI was submitted. If no confirmation 
email is received, inquire about the status of your LOI at 
[email protected].

Selection Process

    LSC will initially review all LOI to determine whether they conform 
to the required format and clearly present all of the required 
elements. These requirements are listed and described above. Failure to 
meet these requirements may result in rejection of the LOI.
    Each proposal will be reviewed to identify those LOI that propose 
projects likely to improve access to justice or the efficiency, 
effectiveness, and quality of legal services provided by grantees. The 
LOI will also be reviewed to determine the extent to which the project 
proposed is clearly described and well thought out, offers major 
benefits to our targeted client community, is cost-effective, involves 
all of the parties needed to make it successful and sustainable, and is 
either innovative or a cost-effective replication of prior successful 
projects. Those applicants satisfying these criteria will be invited to 
submit full applications.

Next Steps for Successful Applicants

    LSC will notify successful Letter of Intent applicants by Thursday, 
April 30, 2015. Successful applicants will have until 11:59 p.m. EDT, 
Monday, June 15, 2015 to complete full applications in the online 
application system.

Waiver Authority

    LSC, upon its own initiative or when requested, may waive 
provisions in this Notice at its sole discretion under extraordinary 
circumstances and when it is in the best interest of the eligible 
client community. Waivers may be granted only for requirements that are 
discretionary and not mandated by statute or regulation. Any request 
for a waiver must set forth the extraordinary circumstances for the 
request and be included in the application. LSC will not consider a 
request to waive the deadline for a LOI unless the waiver request is 
received by LSC prior to the deadline.

Contact Information

    For information on the status of a current TIG project, contact 
Eric Mathison, Program Analyst, Telephone: 202-295-1535; Email: 
[email protected].
    For questions about projects in CT, DC, IL, IN, ME, MA, MI, NH, NJ, 
NY, OH, PA, RI, WI, WV, VT, contact David Bonebrake, Program Counsel, 
Telephone: 202.295.1547; Email: [email protected].
    For questions about projects in AK, AZ, CA, CO, GU, HI, ID, IA, KS, 
MP, MN, MT, NE., NV, NH, NM, ND, OK, OR, SD, TX, UT, WA, WY, contact 
Glenn Rawdon, Program Counsel, Telephone: 202.295.1552; Email: 
[email protected].
    For questions about projects in AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, MO, 
NC, PR, SC, TN, VI, VA, contact Jane Ribadeneyra, Program Analyst, 
Telephone: 202.295.1554, Email: [email protected].
    If you have a general question, please email [email protected].

    Dated: February 11, 2015.
Stefanie K. Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-03159 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 17, 2015 / Notices 8349

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE for the proper performance of the time. An additional feature of the
functions of the agency, including surveys being tested is the inclusion of
Office of Justice Programs whether the information will have a set of questions on perceptions of
[OMB Number 1121–NEW] practical utility; neighborhood safety, fear of crime, and
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s police effectiveness, which would allow
Agency Information Collection estimate of the burden of the the survey to be used to assess changes
Activities; Proposed eCollection proposed collection of information, in these perceptions as well. This
eComments Requested; Reinstatement including the validity of the information is not currently available
With Change of a Previously Approved methodology and assumptions used; from the NCVS.
Collection for Which Approval Has —Enhance the quality, utility, and 5. An estimate of the total number of
Expired Methodological Research to clarity of the information to be respondents and the amount of time
Support the National Crime collected; and/or estimated for an average respondent to
Victimization Survey: Subnational —Minimize the burden of the collection respond: Over the two year period
Companion Study—American Crime of information on those who are to approximately 200,400 households are
Survey Field Test respond, including through the use of expected to complete the survey. The
appropriate automated, electronic, sample is divided into two groups by
AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Statistics, mechanical, or other technological instrument version: ASC1 person-level
Office of Justice Programs, U.S. collection techniques or other forms survey and ASC2 incident-level survey.
Department of Justice. of information technology, e.g., Over the two waves, for both versions,
ACTION: 30-day notice. permitting electronic submission of approximately 25% of households
responses. interviewed in year 1 will be re-
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Overview of This Information interviewed in year 2.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be Collection • The first group of 100,200
submitting the following information 1. Type of Information Collection: households will receive the ASC1, a
collection request to the Office of New collection under activities related person-level survey to measure
Management and Budget (OMB) for to the National Crime Victimization prevalence or the number of adult
review and approval in accordance with Survey Redesign Research (NCVS–RR) household members victimized by one
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. program: NCVS Subnational Companion or more types of violent crime and the
This proposed information collection Study—American Crime Survey Field number of households victimized by
was previously published in the Federal Test. types of property crime. The expected
Register at Volume 79, Number 238, 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: burden placed on these respondents is
pages 73627—73628, on December 11, American Crime Survey (ACS). 12 minutes per respondent for a total of
2014, allowing for a 60 day comment 3. The agency form number: The form 20,040 burden hours for both years.
period. numbers are ASC1 and ASC2, Bureau of • The second group of 100,200
Justice Statistics, Office of Justice households will receive the ASC2, an
DATES: Comments are encouraged and incident-level survey to measure the
will be accepted for additional days Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
4. Affected public who will be asked number of victimization incidents
until March 19, 2015. experienced by all adult household
or required to respond, as well as a brief
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If members. The expected burden placed
abstract: Adults ages 18 or older in 40
you have additional comments largest Core Based Statistical Areas on these respondents is 10.5 minutes for
especially on the estimated public (CBSAs) in the United States, as a total of 17,535 burden hours.
burden or associated response time, measured by the number of households. 6. An estimate of the total public
suggestions, or need a copy of the Since 2008, BJS has initiated numerous burden (in hours) associated with the
proposed information collection research projects to assess and improve collection: The total respondent burden
instrument with instructions or upon the core NCVS methodology. The is approximately 37,575 hours.
additional information, please contact purpose of the Companion Survey Field If additional information is required
Michael Planty, Unit Chief, Test will be to test a low-cost alternative contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Victimization Statistics, Bureau of self-administered survey for collecting Clearance Officer, United States
Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street information about violence and property Department of Justice, Justice
NW., Washington, DC 20531 (email: crime to generate subnational, local Management Division, Policy and
Michael.Planty@usdoj.gov; telephone: level estimates of victimization. The Planning Staff, Two Constitution
202–514–9746). Written comments and/ goal of this test is to generate a survey Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B,
or suggestions can also be directed to that could parallel National Crime Washington, DC 20530.
the Office of Management and Budget, Victimization Survey (NCVS) and Dated: February 11, 2015.
Office of Information and Regulatory Uniform Crime Report (UCR) estimates
Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Jerri Murray,
over time, rather than replicate either of Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530 or them, and could be used to assess
sent to OIRA_submissions@ Department of Justice.
whether local initiatives are correlated [FR Doc. 2015–03114 Filed 2–13–15; 8:45 am]
omb.eop.gov. with changes in crime rates. A BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written secondary goal is to assess change over
comments and suggestions from the time, as the Field Test will be
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

public and affected agencies concerning administered over two years, with a
the proposed collection of information cross-sectional address-based sample LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
are encouraged. Your comments should survey in 2015 and a second address- Request for Letters of Intent To Apply
address one or more of the following based sample survey in 2016. The for 2015 Technology Initiative Grant
four points: rationale for collecting data in two years Funding
—Evaluate whether the proposed is that we are able to assess the ability
collection of information is necessary of the instruments to detect change over AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Feb 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM 17FEN1
8352 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 17, 2015 / Notices

rather than what the user determines he 4. Estimated Costs (maximum 1500 client community, is cost-effective,
or she will best understand and find characters)—Start by stating the amount involves all of the parties needed to
most helpful. Technology provides an of funding you are seeking from the TIG make it successful and sustainable, and
opportunity to design and deliver legal program, followed by the estimated total is either innovative or a cost-effective
information that is optimized for the project cost, summarizing the replication of prior successful projects.
end user. There are good examples of anticipated costs of the major Those applicants satisfying these
how user-centric design can improve components of the project. List criteria will be invited to submit full
legal innovation (see anticipated contributions, both in-kind applications.
www.legaltechdesign.com and and monetary, from all partners
Next Steps for Successful Applicants
www.nulawlab.org). Projects in this area involved in the project.
of interest could incorporate new 5. Major Partners (maximum 1500 LSC will notify successful Letter of
approaches to visual law, online characters)—Identify organizations that Intent applicants by Thursday, April 30,
learning, user interaction and ‘‘legal are expected to be important partners. 2015. Successful applicants will have
information literacy’’ in the design and Specify the role(s) each partner will until 11:59 p.m. EDT, Monday, June 15,
delivery of content. This could play. 2015 to complete full applications in the
potentially focus on low/no-literacy and 6. Innovation/Replication (maximum online application system.
Limited English Proficiency (LEP) 1500 characters)—Identify how and why
the proposed project is new and Waiver Authority
communities or others who are
traditionally under-served by traditional innovative and/or is a replication or LSC, upon its own initiative or when
methods. Alternatively, a project could adaptation of a previous technology requested, may waive provisions in this
also improve the design and project. Identify how and why the Notice at its sole discretion under
effectiveness of online training and proposed project can significantly extraordinary circumstances and when
substantive practice resources for benefit and/or be replicated by other it is in the best interest of the eligible
advocates and volunteers. legal services providers and/or the legal client community. Waivers may be
services community at large. granted only for requirements that are
IV. Specific Letter of Intent
Letter of Intent Deadline discretionary and not mandated by
Requirements
statute or regulation. Any request for a
One Project per Letter of Intent Letters of Intent must be completed waiver must set forth the extraordinary
and submitted into the online system at circumstances for the request and be
Applicants may submit multiple LOIs, http://lscgrants.lsc.gov no later than
but a separate LOI should be submitted included in the application. LSC will
11:59 p.m. EDT, Friday, March 20, 2015. not consider a request to waive the
for each project for which funding is The online system may experience
sought. deadline for a LOI unless the waiver
technical difficulties due to heavy traffic request is received by LSC prior to the
Letter Requirements and Format on the day of the deadline. Applicants deadline.
are strongly encouraged to complete LOI
Letters of Intent must be submitted submissions as early as possible. Contact Information
using the online system at http:// LSC will not accept applications
lscgrants.lsc.gov. Additional For information on the status of a
submitted after the application deadline
instructions and information can be current TIG project, contact Eric
unless a waiver of the deadline has been
found on the TIG Web site at http:// Mathison, Program Analyst, Telephone:
approved in advance (see Waiver
tig.lsc.gov/grants/application-process. 202–295–1535; Email: emathison@
Authority). Therefore, allow sufficient
This system will walk you through the lsc.gov.
time for online submission.
process of creating a simple two-page LSC will provide confirmation via For questions about projects in CT,
LOI. The LOI should concisely provide email upon the completed electronic DC, IL, IN, ME, MA, MI, NH, NJ, NY,
the following information about the submission of each Letter of Intent. OH, PA, RI, WI, WV, VT, contact David
proposed project: Keep this email as verification that the Bonebrake, Program Counsel,
1. Category—select the appropriate program’s LOI was submitted. If no Telephone: 202.295.1547; Email:
category from the drop down list. confirmation email is received, inquire dbonebrake@lsc.gov.
2. Description of Project (maximum about the status of your LOI at For questions about projects in AK,
2500 characters)—Briefly describe the Techgrants@lsc.gov. AZ, CA, CO, GU, HI, ID, IA, KS, MP,
basic elements of the project, including MN, MT, NE., NV, NH, NM, ND, OK,
the specific technology(ies) the project Selection Process OR, SD, TX, UT, WA, WY, contact
will develop or implement; how they LSC will initially review all LOI to Glenn Rawdon, Program Counsel,
will be developed, how they will determine whether they conform to the Telephone: 202.295.1552; Email:
operate, the function they will serve required format and clearly present all grawdon@lsc.gov.
within the legal services delivery of the required elements. These For questions about projects in AL,
system, their expected impact, and other requirements are listed and described AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, MO, NC,
similar factors. (Only the impact should above. Failure to meet these PR, SC, TN, VI, VA, contact Jane
be highlighted here; more details about requirements may result in rejection of Ribadeneyra, Program Analyst,
the system’s benefits should be the LOI. Telephone: 202.295.1554, Email:
provided below.) Each proposal will be reviewed to ribadeneyraj@lsc.gov.
3. Major Benefits (maximum 2500 identify those LOI that propose projects If you have a general question, please
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

characters)—Describe the specific ways likely to improve access to justice or the email techgrants@lsc.gov.
in which the project will increase or efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of
improve services to clients and/or legal services provided by grantees. The Dated: February 11, 2015.
enhance the effectiveness and efficiency LOI will also be reviewed to determine Stefanie K. Davis,
of program operations. To the extent the extent to which the project proposed Assistant General Counsel.
feasible, discuss both the qualitative and is clearly described and well thought [FR Doc. 2015–03159 Filed 2–13–15; 8:45 am]
quantitative aspects of these benefits. out, offers major benefits to our targeted BILLING CODE 7050–01–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Feb 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM 17FEN1
Document Created: 2015-12-18 13:19:22
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 13:19:22
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Dates		Letters of Intent must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 20, 2015.
Contact		Jane Ribadeneyra, Program Analyst, Office of Program Performance, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC, 20007; (202) 295-1554 (phone); [email protected]
FR Citation		80 FR 8349