81 FR 10641 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 40 (March 1, 2016)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 40 (March 1, 2016)
| Page Range | 10641-10643 | |
| FR Document | 2016-04418 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 10641-10643] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-04418] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243. Project: Community Support Evaluation (CSE)--New The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), is requesting clearance for the new data collection associated with the CSE. The CSE is a multicomponent evaluation of two SAMHSA programs--Behavioral Health Treatment Court Collaborative (BHTCC) and Transforming Lives through Supported Employment (SE). SE intends to promote recovery for individuals with serious mental illness, substance use, and co- occurring mental and substance use disorders. The programs are rooted in the belief that recovery is a holistic process bolstered by trauma- informed care and individual- and community-level support. The purpose of the CSE is to (1) describe and assess BHTCC and SE [[Page 10642]] grantee activities and procedures, including the intermediate or direct effects of the programs on participants; (2) document the application and sanctioned adaptations of BHTCC programs in the justice system and of the SE Program; and (3) design and implement plans to disseminate knowledge about how to replicate effective projects in other States, territories, tribal nations, and communities. Findings will inform current grantees, policymakers, and the field about ways to transform the behavioral health system to cultivate resiliency and recovery, actively collaborate with and engage, and improve service delivery for individuals with serious mental, substance, and co-occurring disorders who are in recovery. Eight data collection activities compose the CSE--five for administration with BHTCC program grantees and three to be conducted with SE program grantees. BHTCC Study Instruments Biannual Program Inventory (BPI)-BHTCC: The BPI-BHTCC is a Web- based survey that will capture infrastructure development and direct services that are part of the BHTCC programs. Data include the types of planning, infrastructure, and collaboration grantees are implementing; trainings conducted; and direct services offered as part of the program. The BPI will be completed by grantee evaluation staff twice yearly (April and October) over the grant period. System-Level Assessment (SLA) Key Informant Interviews (KIIs): The SLA KIIs will be conducted with five stakeholders from each BHTCC grantee to assess collaboration strategies to expand or better serve participants; processes for recruiting, screening, and retaining participants; practices to ensure treatment adherence and criminal justice compliance; and involvement of consumers in program planning and implementation. Data include implementation processes/outcomes; service infrastructure, capacity, entry, and delivery processes; management structure; reward and sanction models; trauma-informed practices; collaboration among BHTCC participants; and facilitators and barriers to collaboration. There are three versions of the SLA KIIs: (1) Court personnel (administrators, coordinators, judges, attorneys), (2) service provider (case managers, BHTCC peer specialists), and (3) consumer (clients, family members). Grantee staff will assist with respondent recruitment by collecting consent to contact from potential participants and forwarding the forms to the CSE team. The SLA KIIs will be conducted in grant years two and four via telephone or Skype. The SLA KIIs will cover the same information across years; however, the Year 4 SLA KIIs also will ask for specific plans for future implementation. Concept Mapping: A total of four concept mapping exercises will be conducted--one local and three cross-site concept maps will be created. All concept mapping exercises will be coordinated at the local level with assistance from the CSE team. Beginning in Year two, each grantee will identify and recruit up to 20 stakeholders (BHTCC peers, consumers, family members of consumers, and court personnel) to participate in the first exercise. Concept mapping will be conducted via a Web-based program; accommodations will be made for respondents who do not have access to computers via telephone or paper/pencil. [ssquf] Exercise 1--Local Concept Maps: Between Years two and three, each BHTCC grantee will generate a local concept map identifying the priority supports for recovery. The exercise will take place in two parts. First, participants will be asked to brainstorm as many responses as they wish to a focus prompt about system-level change (e.g., one way that this BHTCC collaborative provides support to consumers is . . .). At a later date, local staff will ask participants to sort and rate the full list of responses from the brainstorming activity in ``any way that makes sense'' to them. Respondents will sort/rate the responses--once for importance and once for frequency-- into groups and name them. The resulting information will be entered into Concept System software to generate a local map identifying the most important aspects of the grantee program that support recovery. [ssquf] Exercise 2--Keys to Recovery (KTR) Map 1: In Year four, up to 20 stakeholders from each BHTCC grantees will participate in a second sorting/rating of local concept mapping information. Grantee staff will develop a list of the most common brainstormed responses to the original local concept mapping exercise. The information will be used to generate a cross-site map on the basis of input from the 17 BHTCC sites. [ssquf] Exercises 3 and 4--Keys to Recovery Maps 2 and 3: In Year four, two groups of up to five BHTCC grantees with a particular court structure or program focus (e.g., veterans' court and other BHTCC types of court models, such as key recovery supports addressing a specific aspect or type of severe mental illness) will participate in two concept mapping exercises to generate KTR maps. The program focus will be determined after the initial site-specific maps have been analyzed. Up to 20 stakeholders from each participating grantee will engage in brainstorming and sorting/rating activities. Respondents will participate via Web, telephone, or paper/pencil. 18-Month Client Level Abstraction Tool: the 18-Month Tool is an Excel-based tool that collects existing data on long-term client outcomes on recidivism. Data include (1) rearrest dates (from the National Crime Information Center database), (2) recommitment dates (from State departments of corrections and local/county jails and corrections), (3) revocation dates (from State and local corrections), and (4) risk assessment quantitative score. Grantee staff will complete the tool at 18 months from the baseline period for any client enrolled in the BHTCC program. Beginning in year two, grantees will upload all extracted data on a quarterly basis. In their final upload (last month of grant activity), grantees will include data for all clients not currently submitted including those enrolled less than 18 months. The 18-Month Tool will be completed by BHTCC grantee evaluation staff using existing sources. In addition, court staff (e.g., court clerks) from two BHTCC comparison courts will complete the tool for non-BHTCC participants as part of a comparison study. Comparison Study Client Level Abstraction Tool: the Comparison Study Tool is an Excel-based tool that collects existing data on comparison cases (individuals who are not participating in the BHTCC program but are comparable in program eligibility) at baseline and six months. Baseline data include demographics and status of screening for co-occurring disorders, employment, and probation/parole. Data abstracted through the six-month tool include employment status, probation/parole status, services received (e.g., case management, treatment, medical care, after care, peer-to-peer recovery support, and education) and number of days services were received. Respondents will include court staff (e.g., court clerks) at comparison courts who have regular interaction with clients during their involvement in the justice system. Respondents will complete the tool on the basis of (1) court paperwork and (2) information discussed during regular court- related interactions. [[Page 10643]] SE Study Instruments Biannual Program Inventory--SE: The BPI-SE is a Web-based survey that captures the infrastructure development and direct services that are part of the SE programs. Data include the types of planning that SE grantees and local implementation sites are implementing and activities and infrastructure developed as part of the project. The BPI is administered twice yearly (April and October) over the grant period and will be completed by SE grantee program staff. Scalability/Sustainability Assessment (SSA) KIIs: The SSA KIIs will be conducted with various stakeholders to assess local SE program resources, infrastructure, outcomes, sustainability, and scalability from stakeholders. Data include changes in outcomes, workforce development, State-level collaboration, partnerships and policies, and scalability and sustainability. There are two versions of the SSA KIIs--each is tailored to the intended audience: (1) State-level administrator (project directors, agency directors, SECC members) and (2) local, pilot-level service provider (local service provider). The SSA KIIs will be conducted remotely by telephone and/or Skype technology in years two and four of the evaluation with five stakeholders from each SE grantee. The KIIs cover the same information across years; however, Year four KIIs will follow up on how the infrastructure and activities taking place in Year two come to fruition. Employment Needs Focus Groups (FGs): The employment needs FGs will be conducted to gather information about the needs and experiences of employment specialists, consumers, and employers as they relate to supported employment principles and program goals. Data include local program implementation, the adoption of policies and practices for sustainability and scalability, and recommendations for program improvement and implementation best practices. Employment Needs FGs will be conducted with employment specialists and employers (who have and have not participated in the program) virtually using a Web-based platform (such as JoinMe) in years two and four of grant funding. Specific topics are tailored to respondent type. [ssquf] Employment specialists will discuss training received and techniques used to engage employers, the needs and experiences of clients and employers, facilitators and barriers to program implementation, and program scalability and sustainability. The employment specialist FG will take 90 minutes. [ssquf] Employers (e.g., hiring managers, supervisors) will discuss experiences and satisfaction with the program, factors that facilitate and pose barriers to their participation, and program scalability and sustainability. The employer FG will take 60 minutes. The estimated response burden to collect this information associated with the CSE is as follows, annualized over the requested three-year clearance period, as presented below: Total and Annualized Averages: Respondents, Responses, and Hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Burden per Instrument Number of Responses per Total number response Annual burden respondents respondent of responses (hours) (hours)* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BHTCC Study Instruments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Biannual Program Inventory-- 17 2 34 0.75 26 BHTCC.......................... System Level Assessment KIIs.... 58 1 58 1 58 18-Month Abstraction Tool....... 19 1 19 5.40 102.6 Comparison Study Abstraction 2 1 2 7 14 Tool (BL)...................... Comparison Study Tool (6 Mo).... 2 1 2 7 14 Concept Mapping Brainstorm/Sort/ 180 1 180 1 180 Rate........................... Concept Mapping Sort/Rate....... 115 1 115 0.5 58 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SE Study Instruments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Biannual Program Inventory--SE.. 7 2 14 0.75 11 Sustainability/Scalability KIIs. 28 1 28 1 28 Employer FG..................... 28 1 28 1 28 Employment Specialist FG........ 28 1 28 1.5 42 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total....................... 467 .............. 508 .............. 562 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Rounded to the nearest whole number. Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent by March 31, 2016 to the SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to: [email protected]. Although commenters are encouraged to send their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments to: 202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. Summer King, Statistician. [FR Doc. 2016-04418 Filed 2-29-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2016 / Notices 10641
Corporation, Aegis Analytical Laboratory Corporation of America Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 8401
Laboratories, Inc., Aegis Analytical Holdings, 1904 Alexander Drive, Fallbrook Ave., West Hills, CA 91304,
Laboratories) Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 818–737–6370 (Formerly: SmithKline
Alere Toxicology Services, 1111 Newton 919–572–6900/800–833–3984 Beecham Clinical Laboratories)
St., Gretna, LA 70053, 504–361–8989/ (Formerly: LabCorp Occupational Redwood Toxicology Laboratory,
800–433–3823 (Formerly: Kroll Testing Services, Inc., CompuChem 3700650 Westwind Blvd., Santa Rosa,
Laboratory Specialists, Inc., Laboratories, Inc.; CompuChem CA 95403, 800–255–2159
Laboratory Specialists, Inc.) Laboratories, Inc., A Subsidiary of Southwest Laboratories, 4625 E. Cotton
Alere Toxicology Services, 450 Roche Biomedical Laboratory; Roche Center Boulevard, Suite 177, Phoenix,
Southlake Blvd., Richmond, VA CompuChem Laboratories, Inc., A AZ 85040, 602–438–8507/800–279–
23236, 804–378–9130 (Formerly: Member of the Roche Group) 0027
Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America STERLING Reference Laboratories, 2617
Scientific Testing Laboratories, Inc.; Holdings, 1120 Main Street, East L Street, Tacoma, Washington
Kroll Scientific Testing Laboratories, Southaven, MS 38671, 866–827–8042/ 98421, 800–442–0438
Inc.) 800–233–6339 (Formerly: LabCorp US Army Forensic Toxicology Drug
Baptist Medical Center-Toxicology Occupational Testing Services, Inc.; Testing Laboratory, 2490 Wilson St.,
Laboratory, 11401 I–30, Little Rock, MedExpress/National Laboratory Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755–
AR 72209–7056, 501–202–2783 Center) 5235, 301–677–7085, Testing for
(Formerly: Forensic Toxicology LabOne, Inc. d/b/a Quest Diagnostics, Department of Defense (DoD)
Laboratory Baptist Medical Center) 10101 Renner Blvd., Lenexa, KS Employees Only
Clinical Reference Lab, 8433 Quivira 66219, 913–888–3927/800–873–8845 Summer King,
Road, Lenexa, KS 66215–2802, 800– (Formerly: Quest Diagnostics Statistician.
445–6917 Incorporated; LabOne, Inc.; Center for
[FR Doc. 2016–04408 Filed 2–29–16; 8:45 am]
DrugScan, Inc., 200 Precision Road, Laboratory Services, a Division of
Suite 200, Horsham, PA 19044, 800– BILLING CODE 4160–20–P
LabOne, Inc.)
235–4890 MedTox Laboratories, Inc., 402 W.
Dynacare ,* 245 Pall Mall Street, County Road D, St. Paul, MN 55112,
London, ONT, Canada N6A 1P4, 519– DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
651–636–7466/800–832–3244
679–1630 (Formerly: Gamma- MetroLab-Legacy Laboratory Services, HUMAN SERVICES
Dynacare Medical Laboratories) 1225 NE 2nd Ave., Portland, OR Substance Abuse and Mental Health
ElSohly Laboratories, Inc., 5 Industrial 97232, 503–413–5295/800–950–5295 Services Administration
Park Drive, Oxford, MS 38655, 662– Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical
236–2609 Center, Forensic Toxicology Agency Information Collection
Fortes Laboratories, Inc., 25749 SW Laboratory, 1 Veterans Drive, Activities: Submission for OMB
Canyon Creek Road, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55417, 612–725– Review; Comment Request
Wilsonville, OR 97070, 503–486–1023 2088, Testing for Veterans Affairs
Laboratory Corporation of America (VA) Employees Only Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Holdings, 7207 N. Gessner Road, National Toxicology Laboratories, Inc., Mental Health Services Administration
Houston, TX 77040, 713–856–8288/ 1100 California Ave., Bakersfield, CA (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
800–800–2387 93304, 661–322–4250/800–350–3515 information collection requests under
Laboratory Corporation of America One Source Toxicology Laboratory, Inc., OMB review, in compliance with the
Holdings, 69 First Ave., Raritan, NJ 1213 Genoa-Red Bluff, Pasadena, TX Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
08869, 908–526–2400/800–437–4986, 77504, 888–747–3774 (Formerly: chapter 35). To request a copy of these
(Formerly: Roche Biomedical University of Texas Medical Branch, documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Laboratories, Inc.) Clinical Chemistry Division; UTMB Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Pathology-Toxicology Laboratory) Project: Community Support Evaluation
* The Standards Council of Canada (SCC) voted Pacific Toxicology Laboratories, 9348
(CSE)—New
to end its Laboratory Accreditation Program for DeSoto Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311,
Substance Abuse (LAPSA) effective May 12, 1998. 800–328–6942, (Formerly: Centinela The Substance Abuse and Mental
Laboratories certified through that program were
accredited to conduct forensic urine drug testing as Hospital Airport Toxicology Health Services Administration
required by U.S. Department of Transportation Laboratory) (SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health
(DOT) regulations. As of that date, the certification Pathology Associates Medical Services (CMHS), is requesting
of those accredited Canadian laboratories will Laboratories, 110 West Cliff Dr., clearance for the new data collection
continue under DOT authority. The responsibility
for conducting quarterly performance testing plus Spokane, WA 99204, 509–755–8991/ associated with the CSE. The CSE is a
periodic on-site inspections of those LAPSA- 800–541–7891x7 multicomponent evaluation of two
accredited laboratories was transferred to the U.S. Phamatech, Inc., 15175 Innovation SAMHSA programs—Behavioral Health
HHS, with the HHS’ NLCP contractor continuing to Drive, San Diego, CA 92128, 888– Treatment Court Collaborative (BHTCC)
have an active role in the performance testing and
laboratory inspection processes. Other Canadian
635–5840 and Transforming Lives through
laboratories wishing to be considered for the NLCP Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 1777 Supported Employment (SE). SE intends
may apply directly to the NLCP contractor just as Montreal Circle, Tucker, GA 30084, to promote recovery for individuals
U.S. laboratories do. 800–729–6432 (Formerly: SmithKline with serious mental illness, substance
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Upon finding a Canadian laboratory to be Beecham Clinical Laboratories; use, and co-occurring mental and
qualified, HHS will recommend that DOT certify
the laboratory (Federal Register, July 16, 1996) as SmithKline Bio-Science Laboratories) substance use disorders. The programs
meeting the minimum standards of the Mandatory Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 400 are rooted in the belief that recovery is
Guidelines published in the Federal Register on Egypt Road, Norristown, PA 19403, a holistic process bolstered by trauma-
April 30, 2010 (75 FR 22809). After receiving DOT 610–631–4600/877–642–2216 informed care and individual- and
certification, the laboratory will be included in the
monthly list of HHS-certified laboratories and
(Formerly: SmithKline Beecham community-level support.
participate in the NLCP certification maintenance Clinical Laboratories; SmithKline Bio- The purpose of the CSE is to (1)
program. Science Laboratories) describe and assess BHTCC and SE
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Feb 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_10681/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2016 / Notices 10643
SE Study Instruments directors, agency directors, SECC and employers (who have and have not
Biannual Program Inventory—SE: The members) and (2) local, pilot-level participated in the program) virtually
BPI–SE is a Web-based survey that service provider (local service provider). using a Web-based platform (such as
captures the infrastructure development The SSA KIIs will be conducted JoinMe) in years two and four of grant
and direct services that are part of the remotely by telephone and/or Skype funding. Specific topics are tailored to
SE programs. Data include the types of technology in years two and four of the respondent type.
planning that SE grantees and local evaluation with five stakeholders from D Employment specialists will discuss
implementation sites are implementing each SE grantee. The KIIs cover the training received and techniques used to
and activities and infrastructure same information across years; however, engage employers, the needs and
developed as part of the project. The BPI Year four KIIs will follow up on how the experiences of clients and employers,
is administered twice yearly (April and infrastructure and activities taking place facilitators and barriers to program
October) over the grant period and will in Year two come to fruition. implementation, and program
be completed by SE grantee program Employment Needs Focus Groups scalability and sustainability. The
staff. (FGs): The employment needs FGs will employment specialist FG will take 90
Scalability/Sustainability Assessment be conducted to gather information minutes.
(SSA) KIIs: The SSA KIIs will be about the needs and experiences of D Employers (e.g., hiring managers,
conducted with various stakeholders to employment specialists, consumers, and supervisors) will discuss experiences
assess local SE program resources, employers as they relate to supported and satisfaction with the program,
infrastructure, outcomes, sustainability, employment principles and program factors that facilitate and pose barriers
and scalability from stakeholders. Data goals. Data include local program to their participation, and program
include changes in outcomes, workforce implementation, the adoption of scalability and sustainability. The
development, State-level collaboration, policies and practices for sustainability employer FG will take 60 minutes.
partnerships and policies, and and scalability, and recommendations The estimated response burden to
scalability and sustainability. There are for program improvement and collect this information associated with
two versions of the SSA KIIs—each is implementation best practices. the CSE is as follows, annualized over
tailored to the intended audience: (1) Employment Needs FGs will be the requested three-year clearance
State-level administrator (project conducted with employment specialists period, as presented below:
TOTAL AND ANNUALIZED AVERAGES: RESPONDENTS, RESPONSES, AND HOURS
Responses Burden per
Number of Total number Annual burden
Instrument per response
respondents of responses (hours)*
respondent (hours)
BHTCC Study Instruments
Biannual Program Inventory—BHTCC ................................ 17 2 34 0.75 26
System Level Assessment KIIs ........................................... 58 1 58 1 58
18-Month Abstraction Tool ................................................... 19 1 19 5.40 102.6
Comparison Study Abstraction Tool (BL) ............................ 2 1 2 7 14
Comparison Study Tool (6 Mo) ........................................... 2 1 2 7 14
Concept Mapping Brainstorm/Sort/Rate .............................. 180 1 180 1 180
Concept Mapping Sort/Rate ................................................ 115 1 115 0.5 58
SE Study Instruments
Biannual Program Inventory—SE ........................................ 7 2 14 0.75 11
Sustainability/Scalability KIIs ............................................... 28 1 28 1 28
Employer FG ........................................................................ 28 1 28 1 28
Employment Specialist FG .................................................. 28 1 28 1.5 42
Total .............................................................................. 467 ........................ 508 ........................ 562
* Rounded to the nearest whole number.
Written comments and send their comments via email, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
recommendations concerning the commenters may also fax their HUMAN SERVICES
proposed information collection should comments to: 202–395–7285.
be sent by March 31, 2016 to the Commenters may also mail them to: Substance Abuse and Mental Health
SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of Office of Management and Budget, Services Administration
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Information and Regulatory
Office of Management and Budget Affairs, New Executive Office Building, Agency Information Collection
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(OMB). To ensure timely receipt of Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. Activities: Submission for OMB
comments, and to avoid potential delays Review; Comment Request
Summer King,
in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016–04418 Filed 2–29–16; 8:45 am]
Mental Health Services Administration
commenters are encouraged to submit (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
their comments to OMB via email to: BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
information collection requests under
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. OMB review, in compliance with the
Although commenters are encouraged to Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Feb 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_10681/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:00:11
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:00:11
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 10641 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR