81 FR 11603 - Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2 and 3; Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 43 (March 4, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 43 (March 4, 2016)
| Page Range | 11603-11605 | |
| FR Document | 2016-04750 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 11603-11605] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-04750] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-010, 50-237, 50-249 and 72-37; NRC-2016-0047] Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2 and 3; Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption to Exelon Generation Company, LLC (hereafter, EGC or the applicant). EGC is the general licensee operating the Dresden Nuclear Power Station (DNPS) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located in Morris, Illinois. Specifically, EGC seeks authorization to load and store one DNPS Unit 1 thoria rod canister containing 18 DNPS Unit 1 thoria rods in a Holtec International, Inc., multi-purpose canister (MPC)-68M. Thoria rods are not approved for storage in the MPC-68M per Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1014, Amendment 8, Rev. 1 \1\ Appendix B, ``Approved Contents and Design Features.'' EGC plans to load and store Holtec HI-STORM 100 spent fuel casks utilizing Amendment 8, Rev. 1 to CoC No. 1014 in the 2016 DNPS spent fuel loading campaign (SFLC). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The licensee's application referred to Amendment 8; since that time, Amendment 8 has been revised. (On February 16, 2016, Amendment 8, Rev. 1 to CoC 1014 became effective.) This revision does not impact the exemption request that is the subject of this environmental assessment because none of the changes in the revision revised the thoria contents or the physical characteristics of the storage cask. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0047 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods:Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0047. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. For the convenience of the reader, the ADAMS accession numbers are provided in a table in the ``Availability of Documents,'' Section IV of this document. [[Page 11604]] NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bernard White, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6577, email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The NRC is considering issuance of an exemption from the spent fuel storage requirements applicable to EGC to operate an ISFSI at the DNPS located in Morris, Illinois. As required by Sec. 51.30 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the NRC performed an environmental assessment. Based on the results of the environmental assessment, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the exemption, and is issuing a finding of no significant impact. Exelon Generation Company holds a general license under 10 CFR part 72 for the storage of spent fuel in the DNPS ISFSI. The applicant is subject to 10 CFR 72.212, which provides in part that the general license is limited to storage of spent fuel in casks approved under the provisions of 10 CFR part 72. The general licensee must ensure that each cask used conforms to the terms, conditions, and specifications of a CoC, or an amended CoC, listed in Section 72.214. The applicant requested an exemption which would allow storage in the Holtec HI-STORM MPC-68M of a DNPS Unit 1 thoria rod canister containing 18 DNPS Unit 1 thoria rods. Specifically, the applicant requested an exemption from 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) and the portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) that requires compliance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of CoC No. 1014, Amendment No. 8, Rev. 1. In evaluating the request, the NRC is also considering, pursuant to authority in 72.7, exemption from similar requirements in 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i); and 10 CFR 72.214, ``List of approved spent fuel storage casks.'' The NRC staff is performing a technical review of the exemption request and will prepare a separate Federal Register notice to document the NRC review of the structural integrity, criticality control, thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for a loaded DNPS Unit 1 thoria rod canister. The NRC staff's decision whether to issue the exemption to EGC as proposed, will be based on the results of the NRC staff's review as documented in this environmental assessment and in the separate Federal Register Notice. II. Environmental Assessment Description of the Proposed Action The proposed action would exempt EGC from specific portions of the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212, ``Conditions of general license issued under Sec. 72.210,'' specifically 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), a portion of 72.212(b)(11), and 10 CFR 72.214, ``List of approved spent fuel storage casks.'' The proposed exemption request pertains to the requirements of CoC No. 1014, Amendment 8, Rev. 1, Appendix B, ``Approved Contents and Design Features,'' Table 2.1-1, ``Fuel Assembly Limits.'' The addition of a new multi-purpose canister (MPC)-68M to the approved models included in CoC No. 1014 was one of the additions included in Amendment 8. Thoria rods are approved content for the MPC-68F, MPC-68, and MPC-68FF. However, Appendix B, Table 2.1-1, Section VI, does not include, as approved content, thoria rods for storage in the MPC-68M. For the DNPS ISFSI, the exemption would allow ECG to deviate from the requirements of CoC No. 1014, Amendment 8, Rev. 1 by permitting the storage of thoria rods in the MPC-68M. Need for the Proposed Action The proposed action would relieve the applicant from requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), the portion of 72.212(b)(11) which states that ``The licensee shall comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC . . .'', and 10 CFR 72.214, ``List of approved spent fuel storage casks.'' The applicant maintains that loading the thoria rod canister during the 2016 DNPS SFLC is part of a program to ensure full core discharge capability. If not loaded during the 2016 DNPS SFLC, EGC states that it would not be able to load and store the DNPS Unit 1 thoria rod canister until 2018. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action In the preparation of this Environmental Assessment, the staff used guidance in NUREG-1748, ``Environmental Review Guidance for Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs.'' The staff evaluated the environmental impacts associated with this exemption. The NRC staff determined that non-radiological environmental impacts from approval of the exemption would not change from those evaluated in CoC 1014, Amendment Nos. 1 and 8, because: (1) The proposed action would not involve any construction activities, land disturbance, excavation, physical changes to the DNPS facilities, or changes in land use; (2) operation of the ISFSI does not require usage of water resources; and (3) the ISFSI does not generate gaseous, liquid, or solid effluents or wastes during operation. Therefore, there are no significant non-radiological impacts associated with the proposed action. The NRC staff also determined that the radiological doses to workers and to the public associated with the proposed action are bounded by previous analyses for CoC 1014, Amendment No. 8, and that radiological doses would be below the NRC's regulatory limits in 10 CFR part 20 and Part 72. In prior NRC staff reviews of CoC 1014, Amendment Nos. 1 and 8, the NRC staff concluded that the Metamic-HT basket in the MPC-68M has very little effect on the external dose rate; and a single thoria rod canister, while unbounded in part of the gamma source spectrum, will not impact cask external dose rates. Additionally, the NRC staff determined that the proposed action will not increase the probability or consequences of accidents since the exemption would authorize loading of a different type of fuel assembly, but use the same procedures for loading, preparation for storage, and storage as all other fuel assemblies. No changes are being made in the types or quantities of effluents that may be released offsite, and there is no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Based on these findings, the NRC concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the approval of the exemption. Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action An alternative to the proposed exemption request would be for Holtec, the CoC holder, to submit an amendment request for Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, which the NRC would need to review for approval. The NRC review and approval of an amendment request would result in a delay in the loading and storage of the DNPS Unit 1 thoria rod canister. EGC plans to load the thoria rod canister during the DNPS 2016 SFLC as part of a program to ensure full core discharge capability. In order to load the thoria [[Page 11605]] rod canister during the spring 2016 SFLC campaign, EGC stated that it must finalize fuel loading package documentation by December 2015. Based on the amount of time generally required to review and approve CoC amendment requests (e.g., 18 months to 27 months), there would not be adequate time for development of fuel loading packages. The timing constraints would also extend beyond the scheduled start of the DNPS SFLC campaign in Spring 2016. According to EGC, delaying the approval to mid-2016 or beyond would delay EGC's ability to have full- core offload capability in the DNPS spent fuel pool until spring 2018. This alternative is not considered further because it does not meet the purpose and need of the proposed action. As another alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered denial of the exemption request (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). This alternative would have the same environmental impacts as the proposed action. In the event that the NRC denied the requested exemption, EGC would continue to operate under the requirements of the current Holtec HI-STORM CoC, which has previously been determined to have no significant impacts. The potential environmental impact of using the Holtec HI-STORM system was initially analyzed in the environmental assessment for the final rule (65 FR 25241; May 1, 2000) to add the Holtec HI-STORM system to the list of approved spent fuel storage casks in 10 CFR 72.214. The environmental assessment for the May 1, 2000, final rule concluded that there would be no significant environmental impact for adding the Holtec HI-STORM system, and therefore, the NRC issued a finding of no significant impact. Alternative Use of Resources This action does not impact any resource implications discussed in previous environmental reviews. Agencies and Persons Consulted The staff consulted with Mr. Joseph Klinger, Assistant Director of the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) by email, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State's response was received by email dated October 28, 2015. The email response states that IEMA reviewed the draft environmental assessment and found ``no basis for denial of this Exemption Request.'' Mr. Klinger concurred with the environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact. The NRC staff has determined that a consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required because the proposed action will not affect listed species or critical habitat. The NRC staff has also determined that the proposed action is not a type of activity that has the potential to impact historic properties because the proposed action would occur within the established DNPS site boundary. Therefore, no consultation is required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. III. Finding of No Significant Impact The NRC staff has reviewed EGC's exemption request to authorize EGC to load and store one DNPS Unit 1 thoria rod canister containing 18 DNPS Unit 1 thoria rods in the DNPS ISFSI. Based on its review of the proposed action, in accordance with the requirements in 10 CFR part 51, the NRC staff has determined that approval of the exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), a portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11), and 10 CFR 72.214 to allow EGC to load and store one DNPS Unit 1 thoria rod canister containing 18 DNPS Unit 1 thoria rods in CoC No. 1014, Amendment 8, Revision 1, will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. For these reasons, NRC has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR 51.31, preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not required for the proposed action, and pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate. IV. Availability of Documents The documents identified in the following table are available to interested persons through one or more of the methods indicated in the ADDRESSES section. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADAMS Document Accession No. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Exelon Generation Company (EGC) application dated ML15029A334 January 29, 2015....................................... EGC supplement dated June 8, 2015....................... ML15159A745 NRC email dated October 21, 2015, to Illinois Emergency ML15323A022 Management Agency (IEMA) forwarding draft environmental assessment and IEMA response dated October 28, 2015, to draft environmental assessment......................... Holtec HI-STORM final rule.............................. ML010670391 NUREG-1748, ``Environmental Review Guidance for ML032450279 Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs''...... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of February, 2016. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Steve Ruffin, Acting Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2016-04750 Filed 3-3-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2016 / Notices 11603
therefore, special circumstances are administrative in nature, and does not SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
present. impact the probability or consequences Commission (NRC) is considering
of accidents. issuance of an exemption to Exelon
Eligibility for Categorical Exclusion
(vi) The requirements from which an Generation Company, LLC (hereafter,
From Environmental Review
exemption is sought involve: EGC or the applicant). EGC is the
With respect to the exemption’s (B) Reporting requirements; general licensee operating the Dresden
impact on the quality of the human The exemption request involves Nuclear Power Station (DNPS)
environment, the NRC has determined submitting an updated COL application Independent Spent Fuel Storage
that this specific exemption request is by DEP and Installation (ISFSI) located in Morris,
eligible for categorical exclusion as (G) Scheduling requirements; Illinois. Specifically, EGC seeks
identified in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25) and The proposed exemption relates to the authorization to load and store one
justified by the NRC staff as follows: schedule for submitting a COL DNPS Unit 1 thoria rod canister
(c) The following categories of actions application update to the NRC. containing 18 DNPS Unit 1 thoria rods
are categorical exclusions provided that: in a Holtec International, Inc., multi-
(i) There is no significant hazards IV. Conclusion
purpose canister (MPC)–68M. Thoria
consideration; Accordingly, the Commission has rods are not approved for storage in the
The criteria for determining whether determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR MPC–68M per Certificate of Compliance
there is no significant hazards 50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by (CoC) No. 1014, Amendment 8, Rev. 1 1
consideration are found in 10 CFR law, will not present an undue risk to Appendix B, ‘‘Approved Contents and
50.92. The proposed action involves the public health and safety, and is Design Features.’’ EGC plans to load and
only a schedule change regarding the consistent with the common defense store Holtec HI–STORM 100 spent fuel
submission of an update to the and security. Also special circumstances casks utilizing Amendment 8, Rev. 1 to
application for which the licensing are present. Therefore, the Commission CoC No. 1014 in the 2016 DNPS spent
review has been suspended. Therefore, hereby grants DEP a one-time exemption fuel loading campaign (SFLC).
there are no significant hazards from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50
considerations because granting the ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
Appendix E, Section I.5 pertaining to
proposed exemption would not: NRC–2016–0047 when contacting the
the Harris Units 2 and 3 COL
(1) Involve a significant increase in NRC about the availability of
application to allow submittal of the
the probability or consequences of an information regarding this document.
revised COL application that complies
accident previously evaluated; or You may obtain publicly-available
with the enhancements to the EP rules
(2) Create the possibility of a new or information related to this document
prior to any request to the NRC to
different kind of accident from any using any of the following methods:
resume the review, and in any event, no • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
accident previously evaluated; or later than December 31, 2016.
(3) Involve a significant reduction in http://www.regulations.gov and search
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22, the
a margin of safety. for Docket ID NRC–2016–0047. Address
Commission has determined that the
(ii) There is no significant change in questions about NRC dockets to Carol
exemption request meets the applicable
the types or significant increase in the Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
categorical exclusion criteria set forth in
amounts of any effluents that may be email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), and the granting of
released offsite; technical questions, contact the
The proposed action involves only a this exemption will not have a
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
schedule change which is significant effect on the quality of the
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
administrative in nature, and does not human environment.
document.
involve any changes to be made in the This exemption is effective upon • NRC’s Agencywide Documents
types or significant increase in the issuance. Access and Management System
amounts of effluents that may be Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-
released offsite. of February 2016. available documents online in the
(iii) There is no significant increase in For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ADAMS Public Documents collection at
individual or cumulative public or Francis M. Akstulewicz, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
occupational radiation exposure; Director, Division of New Reactor Licensing, adams.html. To begin the search, select
Since the proposed action involves Office of New Reactors. ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
only a schedule change which is [FR Doc. 2016–04850 Filed 3–3–16; 8:45 am] select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
administrative in nature, it does not BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
contribute to any significant increase in please contact the NRC’s Public
occupational or public radiation Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
exposure. NUCLEAR REGULATORY 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
(iv) There is no significant COMMISSION email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. For the
construction impact; convenience of the reader, the ADAMS
The proposed action involves only a [Docket No. 50–010, 50–237, 50–249 and 72–
37; NRC–2016–0047] accession numbers are provided in a
schedule change which is table in the ‘‘Availability of
administrative in nature; the application
Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Documents,’’ Section IV of this
review is suspended until further
Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units document.
notice, and there is no consideration of
1, 2 and 3; Independent Spent Fuel
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
any construction at this time, and hence 1 The licensee’s application referred to
the proposed action does not involve Storage Installation
Amendment 8; since that time, Amendment 8 has
any construction impact. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory been revised. (On February 16, 2016, Amendment
(v) There is no significant increase in Commission. 8, Rev. 1 to CoC 1014 became effective.) This
the potential for or consequences from revision does not impact the exemption request that
ACTION: Environmental assessment and is the subject of this environmental assessment
radiological accidents; and finding of no significant impact; because none of the changes in the revision revised
The proposed action involves only a the thoria contents or the physical characteristics of
issuance.
schedule change which is the storage cask.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 Mar 03, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM 04MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_11646/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2016 / Notices 11605
rod canister during the spring 2016 10 CFR 72.214. The environmental Therefore, no consultation is required
SFLC campaign, EGC stated that it must assessment for the May 1, 2000, final under Section 106 of the National
finalize fuel loading package rule concluded that there would be no Historic Preservation Act.
documentation by December 2015. significant environmental impact for
Based on the amount of time generally adding the Holtec HI–STORM system, III. Finding of No Significant Impact
required to review and approve CoC and therefore, the NRC issued a finding The NRC staff has reviewed EGC’s
amendment requests (e.g., 18 months to of no significant impact. exemption request to authorize EGC to
27 months), there would not be load and store one DNPS Unit 1 thoria
adequate time for development of fuel Alternative Use of Resources
rod canister containing 18 DNPS Unit 1
loading packages. The timing This action does not impact any
thoria rods in the DNPS ISFSI. Based on
constraints would also extend beyond resource implications discussed in
its review of the proposed action, in
the scheduled start of the DNPS SFLC previous environmental reviews.
accordance with the requirements in 10
campaign in Spring 2016. According to
Agencies and Persons Consulted CFR part 51, the NRC staff has
EGC, delaying the approval to mid-2016
The staff consulted with Mr. Joseph determined that approval of the
or beyond would delay EGC’s ability to
Klinger, Assistant Director of the Illinois exemption from the requirements of 10
have full-core offload capability in the
Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3),
DNPS spent fuel pool until spring 2018.
by email, regarding the environmental 72.212(b)(5)(i), a portion of 10 CFR
This alternative is not considered
impact of the proposed action. The 72.212(b)(11), and 10 CFR 72.214 to
further because it does not meet the
State’s response was received by email allow EGC to load and store one DNPS
purpose and need of the proposed
dated October 28, 2015. The email Unit 1 thoria rod canister containing 18
action.
As another alternative to the proposed response states that IEMA reviewed the DNPS Unit 1 thoria rods in CoC No.
action, the staff considered denial of the draft environmental assessment and 1014, Amendment 8, Revision 1, will
exemption request (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ found ‘‘no basis for denial of this not significantly affect the quality of the
alternative). This alternative would have Exemption Request.’’ Mr. Klinger human environment. For these reasons,
the same environmental impacts as the concurred with the environmental NRC has determined that pursuant to 10
proposed action. In the event that the assessment and finding of no significant CFR 51.31, preparation of an
NRC denied the requested exemption, impact. Environmental Impact Statement is not
EGC would continue to operate under The NRC staff has determined that a required for the proposed action, and
the requirements of the current Holtec consultation under Section 7 of the pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, a Finding of
HI–STORM CoC, which has previously Endangered Species Act is not required No Significant Impact (FONSI) is
been determined to have no significant because the proposed action will not appropriate.
impacts. The potential environmental affect listed species or critical habitat. IV. Availability of Documents
impact of using the Holtec HI–STORM The NRC staff has also determined that
system was initially analyzed in the the proposed action is not a type of The documents identified in the
environmental assessment for the final activity that has the potential to impact following table are available to
rule (65 FR 25241; May 1, 2000) to add historic properties because the proposed interested persons through one or more
the Holtec HI–STORM system to the list action would occur within the of the methods indicated in the
of approved spent fuel storage casks in established DNPS site boundary. ADDRESSES section.
ADAMS
Document Accession No.
Exelon Generation Company (EGC) application dated January 29, 2015 ......................................................................................... ML15029A334
EGC supplement dated June 8, 2015 ................................................................................................................................................. ML15159A745
NRC email dated October 21, 2015, to Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) forwarding draft environmental assess-
ment and IEMA response dated October 28, 2015, to draft environmental assessment ............................................................... ML15323A022
Holtec HI–STORM final rule ................................................................................................................................................................ ML010670391
NUREG–1748, ‘‘Environmental Review Guidance for Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs’’ .................................. ML032450279
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day NUCLEAR REGULATORY Week of March 14, 2016—Tentative
of February, 2016. COMMISSION
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Steve Ruffin, [NRC–2016–0001] 9:00 a.m. Briefing on Power Reactor
Acting Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, Decommissioning Rulemaking
Division of Spent Fuel Management, Office Sunshine Act Meeting (Public Meeting) (Contact: Jason
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. Carneal: 301–415–1451)
[FR Doc. 2016–04750 Filed 3–3–16; 8:45 am] DATES: March 7, 14, 21, 28, April 4, 11,
This meeting will be webcast live at
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 2016.
the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov/.
PLACE:Commissioners’ Conference
Thursday, March 17, 2016
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland. 9:30 a.m. Meeting with the Advisory
STATUS: Public and Closed. Committee on the Medical Uses of
Isotopes (Public Meeting) (Contact:
Week of March 7, 2016 Douglas Bollock: 301–415–6609)
There are no meetings scheduled for This meeting will be webcast live at
the week of March 7, 2016. the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 Mar 03, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM 04MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_11646/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:05:53
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:05:53
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. | |
| Contact | Bernard White, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6577, email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 11603 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR