81 FR 11678 - Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Proposed Amendments to Marketing Order 989 and Referendum Order
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 44 (March 7, 2016)
Agricultural Marketing Service
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 44 (March 7, 2016)
| Page Range | 11678-11681 | |
| FR Document | 2016-04623 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 11678-11681] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-04623] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules [[Page 11678]] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 989 [Doc. No. AMS-FV-14-0069; FV-14-989-2 PR] Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Proposed Amendments to Marketing Order 989 and Referendum Order AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This rule proposes two amendments to Marketing Order No. 989 (order), which regulates the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in California and provides producers with the opportunity to vote in a referendum to determine if they favor the changes. These amendments were proposed by the Raisin Administrative Committee (Committee), which is responsible for the local administration of the order and is comprised of producers and handlers of raisins operating within the production area. These proposed amendments are intended to improve administration of the order and reflect current industry practices. DATES: The referendum will be conducted from March 9, 2016, through March 23, 2016. The representative period for the purpose of the referendum is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015. ADDRESSES: Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geronimo Quinones, Marketing Specialist, or Michelle P. Sharrow, Rulemaking Branch Chief, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected]. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is issued under Marketing Order No. 989, as amended (7 CFR part 989), regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175. This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposal is not intended to have retroactive effect. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. Section 1504 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Bill)(Pub. L. 110-246) amended section 18c(17) of the Act, which in turn required the addition of supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21, 2008). The additional supplemental rules of practice authorize the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and orders. USDA may use informal rulemaking to amend marketing orders based on the nature and complexity of the proposed amendments, the potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities, and any other relevant matters. AMS has considered these factors and has determined that the amendment proposals are not unduly complex and the nature of the proposed amendments is appropriate for utilizing the informal rulemaking process to amend the order. The proposed amendments were unanimously recommended by the Committee following deliberations at a public meeting held on October 2, 2014. A proposed rule soliciting comments on the proposed amendments was issued on October 15, 2015, and published in the Federal Register on October 16, 2015 (80 FR 62506). Two comments were received. One comment was in support of the amendments. The second comment asked questions about one of the proposals. These comments will be addressed later in this document. AMS will conduct a producer referendum to determine support for the proposed amendments. If appropriate, a final rule will then be issued to effectuate the amendments favored by producers in the referendum. The Committee's proposed amendments would amend the order by: (1) Authorizing the Committee to borrow from a commercial lending institution during times of cash shortage to help ensure continuity of operations during the first half of the year before assessment income is received, and (2) Establishing a monetary reserve equal to one year's budgeted expenses. Proposal #1--Borrowing From a Commercial Lending Institution Section 989.80 of the order, Assessments, authorizes the Committee to collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. This proposal would provide the Committee with authority to borrow from a commercial lending institution during times of cash shortages. Since inception of the marketing order, the Committee has occasionally used the order's volume regulation provisions to pool a portion of the annual raisin crop [[Page 11679]] to assure orderly marketing. These pooled raisins, designated by the Committee as reserve raisins, were sold and released to handlers throughout the crop year. In managing the pooled raisins for the best return to growers, the Committee pooled the cash received from the handlers until equity payments were distributed to the growers. The Committee borrowed funds (with interest) from this reserve raisin pool during times of assessment shortages to temporarily cover expenses, generally during the early part of the new crop year. Volume regulation has not been in effect under the marketing order since 2010, and the Committee has been returning equity payments to the growers who contributed raisins to the 2009 reserve raisin pool. Therefore, funds from the reserve raisin pool are no longer available for the Committee to use during times of cash shortages. The Committee's proposed amendment to the order would allow it to borrow from a commercial lending institution when no other funding is available. This would assist the Committee in bridging finances from the end of one fiscal year through the first quarter of the new fiscal year, before assessments on the new crop are received. Additionally, the Committee has received grants from the Foreign Agricultural Service's (FAS) Market Access Program (MAP) since 1995 to conduct market expansion and development activities in various international markets. Under MAP, participants must first use their own resources for activities and request reimbursement from FAS. Sometimes there is a time-lag between submission of reimbursement requests and receipt of payments, which causes budgeting issues. Having authority to borrow from a commercial lending institution would help to ensure continuity of operations when this occurs. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, it is proposed that Sec. 989.80, Assessments, be amended by adding a sentence in paragraph (c) that would provide the Committee with authority to borrow from a commercial lending institution. Proposal #2--Establish a Monetary Reserve Fund Equal to One Year's Budgeted Expenses Section 989.81 of the order, Accounting, authorizes the Committee to credit or refund unexpended assessment funds from the crop year back to the handlers from whom they were collected. Currently, the order doesn't allow the Committee to retain handler assessments from prior crop years. This proposal would allow the Committee to establish a monetary reserve equal to one year's operational expenses as averaged over the past six years. Reserve funds could be used for specific administrative and overhead expenses such as staff wages, salaries and related benefits, office rent, utilities, postage, insurance, legal expenses, and audit costs; to cover deficits incurred during any period when assessment income is less than expenses; to defray expenses incurred during any period when any or all provisions of the order are suspended; liquidation of the order; and other expenses recommended by the Committee and approved by the Secretary. Reserve funds could not be used for promotional expenses during any crop year prior to the time that assessment income is sufficient to cover such expenses. As previously stated in Proposal #1, the Committee borrowed cash from the reserve raisin pool and repaid it with interest when handler assessment cash shortages occurred in the past. This practice helped the Committee to bridge finances from one fiscal crop year to the next until assessment income for the new crop year was received. This option is no longer available. For the reasons stated above, it is proposed that Sec. 989.81, Accounting, be amended to allow the Committee to retain excess assessment funds for the purpose of establishing a monetary reserve equal to one year's budgeted expenses as averaged over the past six years. Such excess funds could only be used for specific administrative and operational expenses as outlined in the order. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. There are approximately 3,000 producers of California raisins and approximately 28 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order. The Small Business Administration defines small agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000 and defines small agricultural service firms as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201). Based upon information provided by the Committee, it may be concluded that a majority of producers and approximately 18 handlers of California raisins may be classified as small entities. The amendments proposed by the Committee would authorize the Committee to borrow from commercial lending institutions and to establish a monetary reserve fund equal to one year's budgeted expenses. This would help to ensure proper management and funding of the program. The Committee reviewed and identified a yearly budget that would be necessary to continue program operations in the absence of a reserve pool. Based on this budget, the Committee believes a monetary reserve of approximately $2 million would be sufficient to continue operations. The anticipated $2 million to be accumulated in a monetary reserve would not be accrued in one crop year. It would be spread over several years, depending on expenses, assessment revenue, and excess handler assessments accrued in each crop year. For example: If excess annual handler assessments amount to $400,000, it would take five years to accrue $2 million. Currently, the average excess handler assessments paid yearly over the last six years has been $861,622. During the time in which the monetary reserve fund would be accumulated, the Committee would seek funding from a commercial lending institution as previously explained in Proposal #1. While this action would result in a temporary increase in handler costs, these costs would be uniform on all handlers and proportional to the size of their businesses. However, these costs are expected to be offset by the benefits derived from operation of the order. Additionally, these costs would help to ensure that the Committee has sufficient funds to meet its financial obligations. Such stability is expected to allow the Committee to conduct programs that would benefit all entities, regardless of size. California raisin producers should see an improved business environment and a more sustainable business model because of the improved business efficiency. Alternatives were considered to these proposals, including making no changes at this time. However, the Committee [[Page 11680]] believes it would be beneficial to have the means and funds necessary to effectively administer the program. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, ``Vegetable and Specialty Crops.'' No changes in those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. These proposed amendments would impose no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California raisin handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the California raisin production area. All interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and encouraged to participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the October 2, 2014, meeting was public, and all entities, both large and small, were encouraged to express their views on these proposals. A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal Register on October 16, 2015 (80 FR 62506). Copies of the rule were mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members. Finally, the rule was made available through the internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending December 15, 2015, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. Two comments were received. One comment was in support of the proposal. The second comment stated that the term ``commercial lending institution'' is vague and asked for the name of the institution and clarification regarding what constitutes a shortage. The comment also stated that the lending arrangement should be discussed openly. To clarify, as used in this proposal, a shortage would exist when the Committee's cash flow needs exceed the amount of cash available from handler assessments. Regarding open discussion, the Committee establishes a budget and assessment rate annually in meetings that are open to the public. During these meetings, the Committee would discuss any shortages and any available commercial lending opportunities. No changes have been made to the proposed amendments as a result of the comments received. Findings and Conclusions The findings and conclusions and general findings and determinations included in the proposed rule set forth in the October 16, 2015, issue of the Federal Register are hereby approved and adopted. Marketing Order Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled ``Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Raisins Produced from Grapes Grown in California.'' This document has been decided upon as the detailed and appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing findings and conclusions. It is hereby ordered, that this entire rule be published in the Federal Register. Referendum Order It is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted in accordance with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR part 900.400- 407) to determine whether the annexed order amending the order regulating the handling of Raisins Produced from Grapes Grown in California is approved by growers, as defined under the terms of the order, who during a representative period were engaged in the production of raisins in the production area. The representative period for the conduct of such referendum is hereby determined to be August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015. The agents of the Secretary to conduct such referendum are designated to be Maria Stobbe and Andrea Ricci, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected], respectively. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989 Raisins, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: February 26, 2016. Elanor Starmer, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California \1\ Findings and Determinations --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the requirements of Sec. 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and marketing orders have been met. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The findings hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the findings and determinations which were previously made in connection with the issuance of the marketing order; and all said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein. 1. The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further amended, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act; 2. The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further amended, regulates the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in California in the same manner as, and are applicable only to, persons in the respective classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the marketing order; 3. The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further amended, is limited in application to the smallest regional production area which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the declared policy of the Act; 4. The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further amended, prescribe, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due recognition to the differences in the production and marketing of raisins produced in the production area; and 5. All handling of raisins produced in the production area as defined in the [[Page 11681]] marketing order is in the current of interstate or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce. Order Relative to Handling It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date hereof, all handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in California shall be in conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the said order as hereby proposed to be amended as follows: The provisions of the proposed marketing order amending the order contained in the proposed rule issued by the Administrator on October 15, 2015, and published in the Federal Register (80 FR 62506) on October 16, 2015, will be and are the terms and provisions of this order amending the order and are set forth in full herein. PART 989--RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA 0 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 989 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674. 0 2. Revise paragraph (c) of Sec. 989.80 to read as follows: Sec. 989.80 Assessments. * * * * * (c) During any crop year or any portion of a crop year for which volume percentages are not effective for a varietal type, all standard raisins of that varietal type acquired by handlers during such period shall be free tonnage for purposes of levying assessments pursuant to this section. The Secretary shall fix the rate of assessment to be paid by all handlers on the basis of a specified rate per ton. At any time during or after a crop year, the Secretary may increase the rate of assessment to obtain sufficient funds to cover any later finding by the Secretary relative to the expenses of the committee. Each handler shall pay such additional assessment to the committee upon demand. In order to provide funds to carry out the functions of the committee, the committee may accept advance payments from any handler to be credited toward such assessments as may be levied pursuant to this section against such handler during the crop year. In the event cash flow needs of the committee are above cash available generated by handler assessments, the committee may borrow from a commercial lending institution. The payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the committee, and for such purposes as the Secretary may pursuant to this subpart determine to be appropriate, may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect, irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become inoperative. * * * * * 0 3. Revise paragraph (a) of Sec. 989.81 to read as follows: Sec. 989.81 Accounting. (a) If, at the end of the crop year, the assessments collected are in excess of expenses incurred, such excess shall be accounted for in accordance with one of the following: (1) If such excess is not retained in a reserve, as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, it shall be refunded proportionately to the persons from whom collected in accordance with Sec. 989.80; Provided, That any sum paid by a person in excess of his or her pro rata share of expenses during any crop year may be applied by the committee at the end of such crop year as credit for such person, toward the committee's administrative operations for the following crop year; Provided further, That the committee may credit the excess to any outstanding obligations due the committee from such person. (2) The committee may carry over such excess funds into subsequent crop years as a reserve; Provided, That funds already in the reserve do not exceed one crop year's budgeted expenses as averaged over the past six years. In the event that funds exceed one crop year's expenses, funds in excess of one crop year's budgeted expenses shall be distributed in accordance with paragraph (1) above. Such funds may be used: (i) To defray essential administrative expenses (i.e., staff wages/ salaries and related benefits, office rent, utilities, postage, insurance, legal expenses, audit costs, consulting, Web site operation and maintenance, office supplies, repairs and maintenance, equipment leases, domestic staff travel and committee mileage reimbursement, international committee travel, international staff travel, bank charges, computer software and programming, costs of compliance activities, and other similar essential administrative expenses) exclusive of promotional expenses during any crop year, prior to the time assessment income is sufficient to cover such expenses; (ii) To cover deficits incurred during any period when assessment income is less than expenses; (iii) To defray expenses incurred during any period when any or all provisions of this part are suspended; (iv) To meet any other such expenses recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary; and (v) To cover the necessary expenses of liquidation in the event of termination of this part. Upon such termination, any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate; Provided, That to the extent practicable, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-04623 Filed 3-4-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
![11678
Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 44
Monday, March 7, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21,
contains notices to the public of the proposed Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202) 2008). The additional supplemental
issuance of rules and regulations. The 720–8938, or Email: rules of practice authorize the use of
purpose of these notices is to give interested Geronimo.Quinones@ams.usda.gov or informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to
persons an opportunity to participate in the Michelle.Sharrow@ams.usda.gov. amend Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
Small businesses may request marketing agreements and orders. USDA
rules.
information on complying with this may use informal rulemaking to amend
regulation by contacting Antoinette marketing orders based on the nature
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Carter, Marketing Order and Agreement and complexity of the proposed
Division, Specialty Crops Program, amendments, the potential regulatory
Agricultural Marketing Service AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence and economic impacts on affected
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, entities, and any other relevant matters.
7 CFR Part 989 DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– AMS has considered these factors and
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: has determined that the amendment
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–14–0069; FV–14–989–2 proposals are not unduly complex and
PR] Antoinette.carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This the nature of the proposed amendments
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown proposal is issued under Marketing is appropriate for utilizing the informal
in California; Proposed Amendments Order No. 989, as amended (7 CFR part rulemaking process to amend the order.
989), regulating the handling of raisins The proposed amendments were
to Marketing Order 989 and
unanimously recommended by the
Referendum Order produced from grapes grown in
Committee following deliberations at a
California, hereinafter referred to as the
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, public meeting held on October 2, 2014.
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the A proposed rule soliciting comments
USDA.
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act on the proposed amendments was
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
order. issued on October 15, 2015, and
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ published in the Federal Register on
SUMMARY: This rule proposes two The Department of Agriculture October 16, 2015 (80 FR 62506). Two
amendments to Marketing Order No. (USDA) is issuing this rule in comments were received. One comment
989 (order), which regulates the conformance with Executive Orders was in support of the amendments. The
handling of raisins produced from 12866, 13563, and 13175. second comment asked questions about
grapes grown in California and provides This proposal has been reviewed one of the proposals. These comments
producers with the opportunity to vote under Executive Order 12988, Civil will be addressed later in this
in a referendum to determine if they Justice Reform. This proposal is not document. AMS will conduct a
favor the changes. These amendments intended to have retroactive effect. producer referendum to determine
were proposed by the Raisin The Act provides that administrative support for the proposed amendments.
Administrative Committee (Committee), proceedings must be exhausted before If appropriate, a final rule will then be
which is responsible for the local parties may file suit in court. Under issued to effectuate the amendments
administration of the order and is section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any favored by producers in the referendum.
comprised of producers and handlers of handler subject to an order may file The Committee’s proposed
raisins operating within the production with USDA a petition stating that the amendments would amend the order by:
area. These proposed amendments are order, any provision of the order, or any (1) Authorizing the Committee to
intended to improve administration of obligation imposed in connection with borrow from a commercial lending
the order and reflect current industry the order is not in accordance with law institution during times of cash shortage
practices. and request a modification of the order to help ensure continuity of operations
or to be exempted therefrom. Such during the first half of the year before
DATES: The referendum will be handler is afforded the opportunity for assessment income is received, and (2)
conducted from March 9, 2016, through a hearing on the petition. After the Establishing a monetary reserve equal to
March 23, 2016. The representative hearing, USDA would rule on the one year’s budgeted expenses.
period for the purpose of the petition. The Act provides that the
referendum is August 1, 2014, through district court of the United States in any Proposal #1—Borrowing From a
July 31, 2015. district in which the handler is an Commercial Lending Institution
ADDRESSES: Marketing Order and inhabitant, or has his or her principal Section 989.80 of the order,
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops place of business, has jurisdiction to Assessments, authorizes the Committee
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 review USDA’s ruling on the petition, to collect assessments from handlers to
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, provided an action is filed not later than administer the program.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Washington, DC 20250–0237. 20 days after the date of the entry of the This proposal would provide the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ruling. Committee with authority to borrow
Geronimo Quinones, Marketing Section 1504 of the Food, from a commercial lending institution
Specialist, or Michelle P. Sharrow, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 during times of cash shortages. Since
Rulemaking Branch Chief, Marketing (2008 Farm Bill)(Pub. L. 110–246) inception of the marketing order, the
Order and Agreement Division, amended section 18c(17) of the Act, Committee has occasionally used the
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, which in turn required the addition of order’s volume regulation provisions to
1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR pool a portion of the annual raisin crop
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 Mar 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM 07MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_11722/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules 11681
marketing order is in the current of Secretary may pursuant to this subpart (iv) To meet any other such expenses
interstate or foreign commerce or determine to be appropriate, may be recommended by the committee and
directly burdens, obstructs, or affects required under this part throughout the approved by the Secretary; and
such commerce. period it is in effect, irrespective of (v) To cover the necessary expenses of
whether particular provisions thereof liquidation in the event of termination
Order Relative to Handling
are suspended or become inoperative. of this part. Upon such termination, any
It is therefore ordered, that on and * * * * * funds not required to defray the
after the effective date hereof, all necessary expenses of liquidation shall
■ 3. Revise paragraph (a) of § 989.81 to
handling of raisins produced from be disposed of in such manner as the
read as follows:
grapes grown in California shall be in Secretary may determine to be
conformity to, and in compliance with, § 989.81 Accounting. appropriate; Provided, That to the extent
the terms and conditions of the said (a) If, at the end of the crop year, the practicable, such funds shall be
order as hereby proposed to be amended assessments collected are in excess of returned pro rata to the persons from
as follows: expenses incurred, such excess shall be whom such funds were collected.
The provisions of the proposed accounted for in accordance with one of
marketing order amending the order * * * * *
the following: [FR Doc. 2016–04623 Filed 3–4–16; 8:45 am]
contained in the proposed rule issued
(1) If such excess is not retained in a BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
by the Administrator on October 15,
reserve, as provided in paragraph (a)(2)
2015, and published in the Federal
of this section, it shall be refunded
Register (80 FR 62506) on October 16,
proportionately to the persons from
2015, will be and are the terms and NUCLEAR REGULATORY
whom collected in accordance with
provisions of this order amending the COMMISSION
§ 989.80; Provided, That any sum paid
order and are set forth in full herein.
by a person in excess of his or her pro
10 CFR Parts 50, 52, 54, and 100
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED rata share of expenses during any crop
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN year may be applied by the committee
[Docket Nos. PRM–50–106; NRC–2012–
CALIFORNIA at the end of such crop year as credit for 0177]
such person, toward the committee’s
■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR administrative operations for the Environmental Qualification of
part 989 continues to read as follows: following crop year; Provided further, Electrical Equipment
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. That the committee may credit the
excess to any outstanding obligations AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
■ 2. Revise paragraph (c) of § 989.80 to Commission.
due the committee from such person.
read as follows:
(2) The committee may carry over ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; denial.
§ 989.80 Assessments. such excess funds into subsequent crop
years as a reserve; Provided, That funds SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
* * * * * Commission (NRC) is denying a petition
(c) During any crop year or any already in the reserve do not exceed one
crop year’s budgeted expenses as for rulemaking (PRM) submitted by the
portion of a crop year for which volume
averaged over the past six years. In the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
percentages are not effective for a
event that funds exceed one crop year’s (NRDC), and Mr. Paul M. Blanch
varietal type, all standard raisins of that
varietal type acquired by handlers expenses, funds in excess of one crop (collectively, the petitioners) on June 18,
during such period shall be free tonnage year’s budgeted expenses shall be 2012. The petitioners requested that the
for purposes of levying assessments distributed in accordance with NRC amend its regulations to clearly
pursuant to this section. The Secretary paragraph (1) above. Such funds may be and unequivocally require the
shall fix the rate of assessment to be used: environmental qualification of all
paid by all handlers on the basis of a (i) To defray essential administrative safety-related cables, wires, splices,
specified rate per ton. At any time expenses (i.e., staff wages/salaries and connections and other ancillary
during or after a crop year, the Secretary related benefits, office rent, utilities, electrical equipment that may be
may increase the rate of assessment to postage, insurance, legal expenses, audit subjected to submergence and/or
obtain sufficient funds to cover any later costs, consulting, Web site operation moisture intrusion during normal
finding by the Secretary relative to the and maintenance, office supplies, operating conditions, severe weather,
expenses of the committee. Each repairs and maintenance, equipment seasonal flooding, and seismic events,
handler shall pay such additional leases, domestic staff travel and and post-accident conditions, both
assessment to the committee upon committee mileage reimbursement, inside and outside of a reactor’s
demand. In order to provide funds to international committee travel, containment building. The NRC is
carry out the functions of the international staff travel, bank charges, denying this petition because the
committee, the committee may accept computer software and programming, current regulations already address
advance payments from any handler to costs of compliance activities, and other environmental qualification in both
be credited toward such assessments as similar essential administrative mild and design basis event conditions
may be levied pursuant to this section expenses) exclusive of promotional of electrical equipment located both
against such handler during the crop expenses during any crop year, prior to inside and outside of the containment
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
year. In the event cash flow needs of the the time assessment income is sufficient building that is important to safety, and
committee are above cash available to cover such expenses; the petition does not provide significant
generated by handler assessments, the (ii) To cover deficits incurred during new or previously unconsidered
committee may borrow from a any period when assessment income is information sufficient to justify
commercial lending institution. The less than expenses; rulemaking.
payment of assessments for the (iii) To defray expenses incurred DATES:The docket for the petition for
maintenance and functioning of the during any period when any or all rulemaking, PRM–50–106, is closed on
committee, and for such purposes as the provisions of this part are suspended; March 7, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 Mar 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM 07MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_11722/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:08:15
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:08:15
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule and referendum order. | |
| Dates | The referendum will be conducted from March 9, 2016, through March 23, 2016. The representative period for the purpose of the referendum is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015. | |
| Contact | Geronimo Quinones, Marketing Specialist, or Michelle P. Sharrow, Rulemaking Branch Chief, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 11678 | |
| CFR Associated | Raisins; Marketing Agreements and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR