81_FR_12241 81 FR 12196 - Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements

81 FR 12196 - Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 45 (March 8, 2016)

Page Range12196-12197
FR Document2016-05091

Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of information, including extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections. This document describes one collection of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12196-12197]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0011]


Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of 
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from 
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit 
public comment on proposed collections of information, including 
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
    This document describes one collection of information for which 
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 9, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number 
NHTSA-2016-0011 using any of the following methods:
    Electronic submissions: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
    Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the 
Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be 
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov including any 
personal information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Block, Office of Behavioral 
Safety Research (NPD-310), National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46-499, Washington, DC 
20590. Mr. Block's phone number is 202-366-6401 and his email address 
is [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB 
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register 
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of 
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of 
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must 
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR 
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
    (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    (iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.
    In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on 
the following proposed collection of information:
    Title: Awareness & Availability of Child Passenger Safety 
Information Resources (AACPSIR).
    Type of Request: New information collection requirement.
    OMB Clearance Number: None.
    Form Number: NHTSA Forms 1333 and 1334.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of 
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: The National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to conduct a national 
web-based survey to estimate parent and caregiver general knowledge of 
child passenger safety (CPS) information resources, awareness and use 
of child restraint system (CRS) inspection stations, and reported 
barriers to CRS inspection station use. The survey will also examine 
the relationship between parent and caregiver confidence in installing 
CRSs, risk perception, and intent to visit an inspection station. NHTSA 
will contact a maximum of 32,000 households to obtain 1,400 completed 
interviews. NHTSA will use a 5 minute screening instrument to determine 
survey eligibility. Households will be eligible if they have at least 
one adult who regularly travels with a child between the ages of 0 and 
9 in their personal vehicles. Households with an eligible participant 
will be asked by NHTSA to complete a 15 minute interview. Spanish 
translation services will be provided.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the 
Information--NHTSA was established by the Highway Safety Act of 1970 
(23 U.S.C. 101) to carry out a Congressional mandate to reduce the 
mounting number of deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from 
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation's highways. As part of this 
statutory mandate, NHTSA is authorized to

[[Page 12197]]

conduct research as a foundation for the development of motor vehicle 
standards and traffic safety programs.
    Data from NHTSA's Fatality Analysis Reporting System show that an 
average of 3 children under the age of 14 died each day in traffic 
crashes in 2013 and an estimated 470 children were injured. Child 
restraint systems (CRSs) are effective at reducing the risk of injury 
during motor vehicle crashes. Research has shown a 28% reduction in 
risk of death for children (aged 2-6 years) compared to seat belts when 
CRSs are installed correctly. Studies have estimated rates of improper 
installation of CRSs to be in the range of 70-80 percent.
    Many information resources are available to aid parents and 
caregivers with proper child restraint system selection and 
installation, including hands-on instruction. In 1998, NHTSA 
implemented a program for training and certifying child passenger 
safety technicians (CPSTs). Presently, Safe Kids Worldwide hosts Child 
Car Seat Inspection Stations nationwide which provide parents and 
caregivers an opportunity to receive one-on-one instruction regarding 
proper use and installation of child restraints from a certified CPST. 
Research has shown that hands-on instruction on CRS installation is 
effective in reducing misuse of seats. Unfortunately, this resource 
seems to be underutilized. Only about one out of ten drivers 
interviewed for the National Child Restraint Use Special Study (NCRUSS) 
reported having their CRS inspected at an inspection station.
    At present, it is unclear what deters and what encourages use of 
Child Car Seat Inspection Stations and CPSTs. One potential barrier is 
parent/caregiver overconfidence leading to overconfident parents and 
caregivers not recognizing the need to visit an inspection station or 
CPST. One example of this is the NCRUSS where misuse was observed in 
46% of cases, but where most drivers reported being confident or very 
confident that they chose the correct car seat/booster seat and 
installed the car seat/booster seat correctly. Potential barriers to 
use don't stop with overconfidence; they could also include logistical 
and practical matters, such as awareness and accessibility.
    Identifying and better understanding the barriers that result in 
underutilization of inspection stations will allow NHTSA and other 
child passenger safety stakeholders to develop effective programs that 
promote and encourage use of this important life-saving resource.
    Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number, 
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
Under this proposed data collection, the potential respondent universe 
would be people aged 18 years or older who regularly transport children 
between the ages of 0 and 9 in their personal vehicles. NHTSA will send 
survey requests to a sufficient number of households to obtain 1,400 
completed interviews. The requests will be sent via postal mail.
    Respondents within a household would not be randomly selected. 
Rather, the screener would ask the member of the household who most 
frequently drives children to complete the survey. NHTSA considers this 
to be the person in the household most likely to seek CPS information 
and pursue CPS training at an inspection station, and therefore the 
most appropriate respondent for this survey. Each respondent would 
complete a single survey; there will be no request for additional 
follow-up information or response.
    Throughout the project, the privacy of all participants would be 
protected. Access to the online instrument would be controlled using an 
alphanumeric PIN, with access restricted to using encrypted connection 
via Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificates. To protect the online 
instruments from break-in attempts, the public site would feature 
automatic access lockdown after too many unsuccessful login attempts 
are performed within a short amount of time. Similarly, once an 
interview is completed, the survey would no longer be accessible to 
respondents using their PINs. These two measures protect respondent 
responses from being compromised.
    Personally-identifiable information such as the postal address of 
sample members would be kept separate from the data collected, and 
would be stored in restricted folders on secure password protected 
servers that are only accessible to study staff who have need to access 
such information. In addition, all data collected from respondents will 
be reported in aggregate, and identifying information would not be used 
in any reports resulting from this data collection effort. Rigorous de-
identification procedures would be used during summary and feedback 
stages to prevent respondents from being identified through 
reconstructive means.
    Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden 
Resulting From the Collection of Information--NHTSA estimates that the 
total respondent burden for this data collection would be 942 hours. A 
sufficient number of invitation letters would be distributed for 7,000 
potential respondents to log onto the Web site and take a 5 minute 
eligibility screener (7,000 * 5 minutes = 35,000 minutes/60 = 583 
hours). Of those who take the eligibility screener, NHTSA estimates 
that 1,400 would complete the full survey which would average 15 
minutes in length (1,400 * 15 minutes = 21,000 minutes/60 = 350 hours). 
The data collection would also include 9 hours of burden for 9 people 
to complete usability testing at 1 hour each to aid survey instrument 
development (9 * 1 hour = 9 hours). The participants would not incur 
any reporting cost from the information collection. The participants 
would also not incur any record keeping burden or record keeping cost 
from the information collection.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 3, 2016.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2016-05091 Filed 3-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P



                                                    12196                          Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Notices

                                                    Intended Commercial Use Of Vessel:                      (OMB). Under procedures established                      (ii) the accuracy of the agency’s
                                                       ‘‘Sightseeing charter excursions’’.                  by the Paperwork Reduction Act of                     estimate of the burden of the proposed
                                                    Geographic Region: ‘‘Maine, New                         1995, before seeking OMB approval,                    collection of information, including the
                                                       Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode                      Federal agencies must solicit public                  validity of the methodology and
                                                       Island, Connecticut, New York, New                   comment on proposed collections of                    assumptions used;
                                                       Jersey, Delaware, District of Columbia,              information, including extensions and                    (iii) how to enhance the quality,
                                                       Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina,                  reinstatements of previously approved                 utility, and clarity of the information to
                                                       South Carolina, Georgia, Florida’’.                  collections.                                          be collected; and
                                                       The complete application is given in                    This document describes one                           (iv) how to minimize the burden of
                                                    DOT docket MARAD–2016–0024 at                           collection of information for which                   the collection of information on those
                                                    http://www.regulations.gov. Interested                  NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.                   who are to respond, including the use
                                                    parties may comment on the effect this                                                                        of appropriate automated, electronic,
                                                                                                            DATES: Comments must be received on
                                                    action may have on U.S. vessel builders                                                                       mechanical, or other technological
                                                                                                            or before May 9, 2016.
                                                    or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.-                                                                      collection techniques or other forms of
                                                    flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in                   ADDRESSES: You may submit comments                    information technology, e.g., permitting
                                                    accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and                     identified by DOT Docket ID Number                    electronic submission of responses.
                                                    MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part                      NHTSA–2016–0011 using any of the                         In compliance with these
                                                    388, that the issuance of the waiver will               following methods:                                    requirements, NHTSA asks public
                                                    have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.-                   Electronic submissions: Go to http://              comment on the following proposed
                                                    vessel builder or a business that uses                  www.regulations.gov. Follow the online                collection of information:
                                                    U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a                   instructions for submitting comments.                    Title: Awareness & Availability of
                                                    waiver will not be granted. Comments                       Mail: Docket Management Facility,                  Child Passenger Safety Information
                                                    should refer to the docket number of                    M–30, U.S. Department of                              Resources (AACPSIR).
                                                    this notice and the vessel name in order                Transportation, 1200 New Jersey                          Type of Request: New information
                                                    for MARAD to properly consider the                      Avenue SE., West Building Ground                      collection requirement.
                                                    comments. Comments should also state                    Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC                      OMB Clearance Number: None.
                                                    the commenter’s interest in the waiver                  20590.                                                   Form Number: NHTSA Forms 1333
                                                    application, and address the waiver                        Hand Delivery: West Building Ground                and 1334.
                                                                                                            Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey                     Requested Expiration Date of
                                                    criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
                                                                                                            Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between                   Approval: 3 years from date of approval.
                                                    regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
                                                                                                            9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through                        Summary of the Collection of
                                                    Privacy Act                                             Friday, except Federal holidays.                      Information: The National Highway
                                                      Anyone is able to search the                             Fax: 1–202–493–2251.                               Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
                                                    electronic form of all comments                            Instructions: Each submission must                 proposes to conduct a national web-
                                                    received into any of our dockets by the                 include the Agency name and the                       based survey to estimate parent and
                                                    name of the individual submitting the                   Docket number for this Notice. Note that              caregiver general knowledge of child
                                                    comment (or signing the comment, if                     all comments received will be posted                  passenger safety (CPS) information
                                                    submitted on behalf of an association,                  without change to http://                             resources, awareness and use of child
                                                    business, labor union, etc.). You may                   www.regulations.gov including any                     restraint system (CRS) inspection
                                                    review DOT’s complete Privacy Act                       personal information provided.                        stations, and reported barriers to CRS
                                                    Statement in the Federal Register                                                                             inspection station use. The survey will
                                                                                                            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      also examine the relationship between
                                                    published on April 11, 2000 (Volume                     Alan Block, Office of Behavioral Safety
                                                    65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).                                                                               parent and caregiver confidence in
                                                                                                            Research (NPD–310), National Highway                  installing CRSs, risk perception, and
                                                      By Order of the Maritime Administrator                Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New               intent to visit an inspection station.
                                                      Dated: March 1, 2016.                                 Jersey Avenue SE., W46–499,                           NHTSA will contact a maximum of
                                                    T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,                                Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Block’s                     32,000 households to obtain 1,400
                                                    Secretary, Maritime Administration.                     phone number is 202–366–6401 and his                  completed interviews. NHTSA will use
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–05113 Filed 3–7–16; 8:45 am]              email address is Alan.Block@dot.gov.                  a 5 minute screening instrument to
                                                    BILLING CODE 4910–81–P                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the                  determine survey eligibility.
                                                                                                            Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,                      Households will be eligible if they have
                                                                                                            before an agency submits a proposed                   at least one adult who regularly travels
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                            collection of information to OMB for                  with a child between the ages of 0 and
                                                                                                            approval, it must publish a document in               9 in their personal vehicles. Households
                                                    National Highway Traffic Safety
                                                                                                            the Federal Register providing a 60-day               with an eligible participant will be
                                                    Administration
                                                                                                            comment period and otherwise consult                  asked by NHTSA to complete a 15
                                                    [U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0011]                   with members of the public and affected               minute interview. Spanish translation
                                                                                                            agencies concerning each proposed                     services will be provided.
                                                    Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping                      collection of information. The OMB has                   Description of the Need for the
                                                    Requirements                                            promulgated regulations describing                    Information and Proposed Use of the
                                                                                                            what must be included in such a                       Information—NHTSA was established
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    AGENCY:  National Highway Traffic
                                                    Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.                     document. Under OMB’s regulations (at                 by the Highway Safety Act of 1970 (23
                                                    ACTION: Request for public comment on
                                                                                                            5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask                  U.S.C. 101) to carry out a Congressional
                                                    proposed collection of information.                     for public comment on the following:                  mandate to reduce the mounting
                                                                                                               (i) Whether the proposed collection of             number of deaths, injuries, and
                                                    SUMMARY:   Before a Federal agency can                  information is necessary for the proper               economic losses resulting from motor
                                                    collect certain information from the                    performance of the functions of the                   vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
                                                    public, it must receive approval from                   agency, including whether the                         highways. As part of this statutory
                                                    the Office of Management and Budget                     information will have practical utility;              mandate, NHTSA is authorized to


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:02 Mar 07, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00132   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM   08MRN1


                                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Notices                                                  12197

                                                    conduct research as a foundation for the                   Description of the Likely Respondents              collection would be 942 hours. A
                                                    development of motor vehicle standards                  (Including Estimated Number, and                      sufficient number of invitation letters
                                                    and traffic safety programs.                            Proposed Frequency of Response to the                 would be distributed for 7,000 potential
                                                       Data from NHTSA’s Fatality Analysis                  Collection of Information)—Under this                 respondents to log onto the Web site
                                                    Reporting System show that an average                   proposed data collection, the potential               and take a 5 minute eligibility screener
                                                    of 3 children under the age of 14 died                  respondent universe would be people                   (7,000 * 5 minutes = 35,000 minutes/60
                                                    each day in traffic crashes in 2013 and                 aged 18 years or older who regularly                  = 583 hours). Of those who take the
                                                    an estimated 470 children were injured.                 transport children between the ages of 0              eligibility screener, NHTSA estimates
                                                    Child restraint systems (CRSs) are                      and 9 in their personal vehicles. NHTSA               that 1,400 would complete the full
                                                    effective at reducing the risk of injury                will send survey requests to a sufficient             survey which would average 15 minutes
                                                    during motor vehicle crashes. Research                  number of households to obtain 1,400                  in length (1,400 * 15 minutes = 21,000
                                                    has shown a 28% reduction in risk of                    completed interviews. The requests will               minutes/60 = 350 hours). The data
                                                    death for children (aged 2–6 years)                     be sent via postal mail.                              collection would also include 9 hours of
                                                    compared to seat belts when CRSs are                       Respondents within a household                     burden for 9 people to complete
                                                    installed correctly. Studies have                       would not be randomly selected. Rather,               usability testing at 1 hour each to aid
                                                    estimated rates of improper installation                the screener would ask the member of                  survey instrument development (9 * 1
                                                    of CRSs to be in the range of 70–80                     the household who most frequently                     hour = 9 hours). The participants would
                                                    percent.                                                drives children to complete the survey.               not incur any reporting cost from the
                                                       Many information resources are                       NHTSA considers this to be the person                 information collection. The participants
                                                    available to aid parents and caregivers                 in the household most likely to seek                  would also not incur any record keeping
                                                    with proper child restraint system                      CPS information and pursue CPS                        burden or record keeping cost from the
                                                    selection and installation, including                   training at an inspection station, and                information collection.
                                                    hands-on instruction. In 1998, NHTSA                    therefore the most appropriate
                                                                                                            respondent for this survey. Each                        Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
                                                    implemented a program for training and
                                                                                                            respondent would complete a single                      Issued in Washington, DC on March 3,
                                                    certifying child passenger safety                                                                             2016.
                                                    technicians (CPSTs). Presently, Safe                    survey; there will be no request for
                                                    Kids Worldwide hosts Child Car Seat                     additional follow-up information or                   Jeff Michael,
                                                    Inspection Stations nationwide which                    response.                                             Associate Administrator, Research and
                                                                                                               Throughout the project, the privacy of             Program Development.
                                                    provide parents and caregivers an
                                                                                                            all participants would be protected.                  [FR Doc. 2016–05091 Filed 3–7–16; 8:45 am]
                                                    opportunity to receive one-on-one
                                                                                                            Access to the online instrument would                 BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
                                                    instruction regarding proper use and                    be controlled using an alphanumeric
                                                    installation of child restraints from a                 PIN, with access restricted to using
                                                    certified CPST. Research has shown that                 encrypted connection via Secure                       DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                                    hands-on instruction on CRS                             Sockets Layer (SSL) certificates. To
                                                    installation is effective in reducing                   protect the online instruments from                   National Highway Traffic Safety
                                                    misuse of seats. Unfortunately, this                    break-in attempts, the public site would              Administration
                                                    resource seems to be underutilized.                     feature automatic access lockdown after
                                                    Only about one out of ten drivers                       too many unsuccessful login attempts                  Petition for Exemption From the
                                                    interviewed for the National Child                      are performed within a short amount of                Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
                                                    Restraint Use Special Study (NCRUSS)                    time. Similarly, once an interview is                 Standard; American Honda Motor Co.,
                                                    reported having their CRS inspected at                  completed, the survey would no longer                 Inc.
                                                    an inspection station.                                  be accessible to respondents using their
                                                       At present, it is unclear what deters                                                                      AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
                                                                                                            PINs. These two measures protect                      Safety Administration (NHTSA),
                                                    and what encourages use of Child Car                    respondent responses from being
                                                    Seat Inspection Stations and CPSTs.                                                                           Department of Transportation (DOT).
                                                                                                            compromised.
                                                    One potential barrier is parent/caregiver                  Personally-identifiable information                ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
                                                    overconfidence leading to overconfident                 such as the postal address of sample                  SUMMARY:   This document grants in full
                                                    parents and caregivers not recognizing                  members would be kept separate from                   the American Honda Motor Co., Inc.’s
                                                    the need to visit an inspection station or              the data collected, and would be stored               (Honda) petition for an exemption of the
                                                    CPST. One example of this is the                        in restricted folders on secure password              Pilot vehicle line in accordance with 49
                                                    NCRUSS where misuse was observed in                     protected servers that are only                       CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle
                                                    46% of cases, but where most drivers                    accessible to study staff who have need               Theft Prevention Standard. This
                                                    reported being confident or very                        to access such information. In addition,              petition is granted because the agency
                                                    confident that they chose the correct car               all data collected from respondents will              has determined that the antitheft device
                                                    seat/booster seat and installed the car                 be reported in aggregate, and identifying             to be placed on the line as standard
                                                    seat/booster seat correctly. Potential                  information would not be used in any                  equipment is likely to be as effective in
                                                    barriers to use don’t stop with                         reports resulting from this data                      reducing and deterring motor vehicle
                                                    overconfidence; they could also include                 collection effort. Rigorous de-                       theft as compliance with the parts-
                                                    logistical and practical matters, such as               identification procedures would be used               marking requirements of the 49 CFR
                                                    awareness and accessibility.                            during summary and feedback stages to
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                  part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
                                                       Identifying and better understanding                 prevent respondents from being                        Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention
                                                    the barriers that result in                             identified through reconstructive                     Standard).
                                                    underutilization of inspection stations                 means.
                                                    will allow NHTSA and other child                           Estimate of the Total Annual                       DATES:  The exemption granted by this
                                                    passenger safety stakeholders to develop                Reporting and Record Keeping Burden                   notice is effective beginning with the
                                                    effective programs that promote and                     Resulting From the Collection of                      2017 model year (MY).
                                                    encourage use of this important life-                   Information—NHTSA estimates that the                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
                                                    saving resource.                                        total respondent burden for this data                 Deborah Mazyck, Office of International


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:02 Mar 07, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00133   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM   08MRN1



Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:09:58
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:09:58
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionRequest for public comment on proposed collection of information.
DatesComments must be received on or before May 9, 2016.
ContactAlan Block, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NPD-310), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46-499, Washington, DC
FR Citation81 FR 12196 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR