81 FR 1284 - Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 6 (January 11, 2016)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 6 (January 11, 2016)
| Page Range | 1284-1286 | |
| FR Document | 2016-00294 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 1284-1286] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-00294] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0056] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of final disposition. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 59 individuals from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various reasons. The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce without meeting the prescribed vision requirement in one eye. The Agency has concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these CMV drivers. DATES: The exemptions were granted November 3, 2015. The exemptions expire on November 3, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-113, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Electronic Access You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document Management System (FDMS) at http://www.regulations.gov. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. II. Background On October 1, 2015, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of exemption applications from certain individuals, and requested comments from the public (80 FR 59230). That notice listed 59 applicants' case histories. The 59 individuals applied for exemptions from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate CMVs in interstate commerce. Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the 59 applications on their merits and made a determination to grant exemptions to each of them. III. Vision and Driving Experience of the Applicants The vision requirement in the FMCSRs provides: A person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle if that person has distant visual acuity of at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye without corrective lenses or visual acuity separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen) or better with corrective lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or without corrective lenses, field of vision of at least 70[deg] in the horizontal meridian in each eye, and the ability to recognize the colors of traffic signals and devices showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)). FMCSA recognizes that some drivers do not meet the vision requirement but have adapted their driving to accommodate their vision limitation and demonstrated their ability to drive safely. The 59 exemption applicants listed in this notice are in this category. They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various reasons, including amblyopia, aphakia, bullous keratopathy, cancerous tumor, cataract, central pigment epithelial atrophy, central retinal detachment, central serous retinopathy, central vision loss, chorioretinal scar, Coat's exudative, complete loss of vision, corneal scar, decreased vision, glaucoma, Lasik surgery complication, macular degeneration, macular hole, macular scar, optic atrophy, optic neuropathy, optic nerve coloboma, phthisis bulbi, prosthetic eye, refractive amblyopia, retinal detachment, retinal scar, traumatic cataract, and vein occlusion. In most cases, their eye conditions were not recently developed. Thirty-five of the applicants were either born with their vision impairments or have had them since childhood. The 24 individuals that sustained their vision conditions as adults have had it for a range of 3 to 39 years. Although each applicant has one eye which does not meet the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at least 20/40 corrected vision in the other eye, and in a doctor's opinion, has sufficient vision to perform all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors' opinions are supported by the applicants' possession of valid commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) or non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to knowledge and skills tests designed to evaluate their qualifications to operate a CMV. All of these applicants satisfied the testing requirements for their State of residence. By meeting State licensing requirements, the applicants demonstrated their ability to operate a CMV, with their limited vision, to the satisfaction of the State. While possessing a valid CDL or non-CDL, these 59 drivers have been authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate commerce, even though their vision disqualified them from driving in interstate commerce. They have driven CMVs with their limited vision in careers ranging for 0 to 55 years. In the past three years, 2 drivers were involved in crashes, and 3 drivers were convicted of moving violations in a CMV. The qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each applicant were stated and discussed in detail in the October 1, 2015 notice (80 FR 59230). IV. Basis for Exemption Determination Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would be achieved without the exemption. Without the exemption, applicants will continue to be restricted to intrastate driving. With the exemption, applicants can drive in interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis [[Page 1285]] focuses on whether an equal or greater level of safety is likely to be achieved by permitting each of these drivers to drive in interstate commerce as opposed to restricting him or her to driving in intrastate commerce. To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA considered the medical reports about the applicants' vision as well as their driving records and experience with the vision deficiency. To qualify for an exemption from the vision requirement, FMCSA requires a person to present verifiable evidence that he/she has driven a commercial vehicle safely with the vision deficiency for the past 3 years. Recent driving performance is especially important in evaluating future safety, according to several research studies designed to correlate past and future driving performance. Results of these studies support the principle that the best predictor of future performance by a driver is his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations. Copies of the studies may be found at Docket Number FMCSA-1998-3637. FMCSA believes it can properly apply the principle to monocular drivers, because data from the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) former waiver study program clearly demonstrate the driving performance of experienced monocular drivers in the program is better than that of all CMV drivers collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345, March 26, 1996). The fact that experienced monocular drivers demonstrated safe driving records in the waiver program supports a conclusion that other monocular drivers, meeting the same qualifying conditions as those required by the waiver program, are also likely to have adapted to their vision deficiency and will continue to operate safely. The first major research correlating past and future performance was done in England by Greenwood and Yule in 1920. Subsequent studies, building on that model, concluded that crash rates for the same individual exposed to certain risks for two different time periods vary only slightly (See Bates and Neyman, University of California Publications in Statistics, April 1952). Other studies demonstrated theories of predicting crash proneness from crash history coupled with other factors. These factors--such as age, sex, geographic location, mileage driven and conviction history--are used every day by insurance companies and motor vehicle bureaus to predict the probability of an individual experiencing future crashes (See Weber, Donald C., ``Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression Analysis of a Poisson Process,'' Journal of American Statistical Association, June 1971). A 1964 California Driver Record Study prepared by the California Department of Motor Vehicles concluded that the best overall crash predictor for both concurrent and nonconcurrent events is the number of single convictions. This study used 3 consecutive years of data, comparing the experiences of drivers in the first 2 years with their experiences in the final year. Applying principles from these studies to the past 3-year record of the 59 applicants, 2 drivers were involved in crashes, and 3 drivers were convicted of moving violations in a CMV. All the applicants achieved a record of safety while driving with their vision impairment, demonstrating the likelihood that they have adapted their driving skills to accommodate their condition. As the applicants' ample driving histories with their vision deficiencies are good predictors of future performance, FMCSA concludes their ability to drive safely can be projected into the future. We believe that the applicants' intrastate driving experience and history provide an adequate basis for predicting their ability to drive safely in interstate commerce. Intrastate driving, like interstate operations, involves substantial driving on highways on the interstate system and on other roads built to interstate standards. Moreover, driving in congested urban areas exposes the driver to more pedestrian and vehicular traffic than exists on interstate highways. Faster reaction to traffic and traffic signals is generally required because distances between them are more compact. These conditions tax visual capacity and driver response just as intensely as interstate driving conditions. The veteran drivers in this proceeding have operated CMVs safely under those conditions for at least 3 years, most for much longer. Their experience and driving records lead us to believe that each applicant is capable of operating in interstate commerce as safely as he/she has been performing in intrastate commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds that exempting these applicants from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption. For this reason, the Agency is granting the exemptions for the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to the 59 applicants listed in the notice of October 1, 2015 (80 FR 59230). We recognize that the vision of an applicant may change and affect his/her ability to operate a CMV as safely as in the past. As a condition of the exemption, therefore, FMCSA will impose requirements on the 59 individuals consistent with the grandfathering provisions applied to drivers who participated in the Agency's vision waiver program. Those requirements are found at 49 CFR 391.64(b) and include the following: (1) That each individual be physically examined every year (a) by an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the better eye continues to meet the requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must have a copy of the certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official. V. Discussion of Comments FMCSA received 6 comments in this proceeding. Samuel Byler, Andrea Gonzalez, and an anonymous commenter are in favor of all drivers on the notice receiving vision exemptions. An anonymous commenter stated that the requirements for a vision exemption should be more stringent. Steve Riney is in favor of granting a vision exemption to Richard Parker and Steve Wilson is in favor of granting a vision exemption to Harjot Aujla. IV. Conclusion Based upon its evaluation of the 59 exemption applications, FMCSA exempts the following drivers from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above (49 CFR 391.64(b)): Steven B. Anderson (ID), Harjot S. Aujla (WA), Thomas B. Berger (PA), Jay E. Biggers (ID), Timothy A. Bohling (CO), Brian M. Bowman (TN), Gary Bozowski (NJ), Timothy V. Burke (CO), Timothy J. Burleson (IL), Robert J. Burns (KY), Richard A. Congdon, Jr. (OR), James E. Copp (PA), Jose C. Costa (WA), Thomas P. Davidson (NJ), Mark Davis (ME), Stephen W. Deminie (TX), Brad M. Donald (MI), Robert L. Ecker (MD), John A. Gartner (MN), Brian W. Gillund [[Page 1286]] (MN), Glenn F. Gorsuch (OH), Keith N. Hall (UT), Steven E. Hayes (IN), Francisco Hernandez, Jr. (NM), Mervin M. Hershberger (WI), Dean M. Hobson (IL), Timmy R. Holley (PA), David E. Hopson (TX), Amos S. Hostetter, Jr. (OH), Isadore Johnson, Jr. (NY), William J. Kelly (CT), Stephen C. Linardos (FL), Daniel C. Linares (CA), Ray J. Liner (LA), Robert E. Mayers (MN), Kraig P. Middleton (MI), James G. Miles (TN), Rogelio Rocha Monjaraz (MD), Pablo R. Murillo (TX), Wayne Nicolaisen (PA), John R. Ogno (NJ), Richard A. Parker II (KS), Vincent E. Perkins (MA), John R. Price (AR), Francis D. Reginald, Jr. (NJ), Juan A. Rodriguez (CT), Roger D. Rogers (PA), Robert E. Rohrer (PA), David L. Roth (SD), James O. Russell, Jr. (OH), Ronald B. Salter (MS), Michael J. Schmelzle (KS), Ralph J. Schmitt (CO), Charles D. Theademan (WA), Dwight Tullis (IL), Arnulfo J. Valenzuela (TX), Danny L. Watson (TN), Lorenzo A. Williams (DE), William E. Zezulka (MN). In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time. Issued on: December 30, 2015. Larry W. Minor, Associate Administrator for Policy. [FR Doc. 2016-00294 Filed 1-8-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
![1284 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2016 / Notices
Dated: December 29, 2015. Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 vision loss, chorioretinal scar, Coat’s
Larry W. Minor, U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments exudative, complete loss of vision,
Associate Administrator for Policy. from the public to better inform its corneal scar, decreased vision,
[FR Doc. 2016–00295 Filed 1–8–16; 8:45 am] rulemaking process. DOT posts these glaucoma, Lasik surgery complication,
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P comments, without edit, including any macular degeneration, macular hole,
personal information the commenter macular scar, optic atrophy, optic
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as neuropathy, optic nerve coloboma,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION described in the system of records phthisis bulbi, prosthetic eye, refractive
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can amblyopia, retinal detachment, retinal
Federal Motor Carrier Safety be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. scar, traumatic cataract, and vein
Administration occlusion. In most cases, their eye
II. Background
[Docket No. FMCSA–2015–0056] conditions were not recently developed.
On October 1, 2015, FMCSA Thirty-five of the applicants were either
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption published a notice of receipt of born with their vision impairments or
Applications; Vision exemption applications from certain have had them since childhood.
individuals, and requested comments The 24 individuals that sustained
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety from the public (80 FR 59230). That their vision conditions as adults have
Administration (FMCSA), DOT. notice listed 59 applicants’ case had it for a range of 3 to 39 years.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition. histories. The 59 individuals applied for Although each applicant has one eye
exemptions from the vision requirement which does not meet the vision
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
decision to exempt 59 individuals from operate CMVs in interstate commerce. each has at least 20/40 corrected vision
the vision requirement in the Federal Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, in the other eye, and in a doctor’s
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2- opinion, has sufficient vision to perform
(FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV.
vision requirement in one eye for would likely achieve a level of safety Doctors’ opinions are supported by the
various reasons. The exemptions will that is equivalent to or greater than the applicants’ possession of valid
enable these individuals to operate level that would be achieved absent commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) or
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in such exemption.’’ The statute also non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
interstate commerce without meeting allows the Agency to renew exemptions issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to
the prescribed vision requirement in at the end of the 2-year period. knowledge and skills tests designed to
one eye. The Agency has concluded that Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the evaluate their qualifications to operate a
granting these exemptions will provide 59 applications on their merits and CMV.
a level of safety that is equivalent to or made a determination to grant All of these applicants satisfied the
greater than the level of safety exemptions to each of them. testing requirements for their State of
maintained without the exemptions for residence. By meeting State licensing
these CMV drivers. III. Vision and Driving Experience of
requirements, the applicants
DATES: The exemptions were granted the Applicants
demonstrated their ability to operate a
November 3, 2015. The exemptions The vision requirement in the CMV, with their limited vision, to the
expire on November 3, 2017. FMCSRs provides: satisfaction of the State.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A person is physically qualified to While possessing a valid CDL or non-
Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical drive a commercial motor vehicle if that CDL, these 59 drivers have been
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001, person has distant visual acuity of at authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye commerce, even though their vision
Department of Transportation, 1200 without corrective lenses or visual disqualified them from driving in
New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64– acuity separately corrected to 20/40 interstate commerce. They have driven
113, Washington, DC 20590–0001. (Snellen) or better with corrective CMVs with their limited vision in
Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least careers ranging for 0 to 55 years. In the
Monday through Friday, except Federal 20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or past three years, 2 drivers were involved
holidays. If you have questions without corrective lenses, field of vision in crashes, and 3 drivers were convicted
regarding viewing or submitting of at least 70° in the horizontal meridian of moving violations in a CMV.
material to the docket, contact Docket in each eye, and the ability to recognize The qualifications, experience, and
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826. the colors of traffic signals and devices medical condition of each applicant
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR were stated and discussed in detail in
391.41(b)(10)). the October 1, 2015 notice (80 FR
I. Electronic Access FMCSA recognizes that some drivers 59230).
You may see all the comments online do not meet the vision requirement but
through the Federal Document have adapted their driving to IV. Basis for Exemption Determination
Management System (FDMS) at http:// accommodate their vision limitation Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
www.regulations.gov. and demonstrated their ability to drive FMCSA may grant an exemption from
Docket: For access to the docket to safely. The 59 exemption applicants the vision requirement in 49 CFR
read background documents or listed in this notice are in this category. 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely
ebenthall on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
comments, go to http:// They are unable to meet the vision to achieve an equivalent or greater level
www.regulations.gov and/or Room requirement in one eye for various of safety than would be achieved
W12–140 on the ground level of the reasons, including amblyopia, aphakia, without the exemption. Without the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue bullous keratopathy, cancerous tumor, exemption, applicants will continue to
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. cataract, central pigment epithelial be restricted to intrastate driving. With
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, atrophy, central retinal detachment, the exemption, applicants can drive in
except Federal holidays. central serous retinopathy, central interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:33 Jan 14, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM 11JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_1290/page/1.svg)
![1286 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2016 / Notices
(MN), Glenn F. Gorsuch (OH), Keith N. Standards. FRA assigned the petition New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Hall (UT), Steven E. Hayes (IN), Docket Number FRA–2015–0139. Washington, DC 20590.
Francisco Hernandez, Jr. (NM), Mervin Amtrak seeks a temporary waiver of • Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
M. Hershberger (WI), Dean M. Hobson compliance from the requirements of 49 Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
(IL), Timmy R. Holley (PA), David E. CFR 238.115(b)(1)(2), which covers Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
Hopson (TX), Amos S. Hostetter, Jr. ‘‘marking and instructions for and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
(OH), Isadore Johnson, Jr. (NY), William emergency egress and rescue access,’’ except Federal Holidays.
J. Kelly (CT), Stephen C. Linardos (FL), and references APTA PR–E–S_013–99, Communications received by
Daniel C. Linares (CA), Ray J. Liner Rev. 1, ‘‘Standard for Emergency February 25, 2016 will be considered by
(LA), Robert E. Mayers (MN), Kraig P. Lighting System Design for Passenger FRA before final action is taken.
Middleton (MI), James G. Miles (TN), Cars,’’ for a period of 12 months until Comments received after that date will
Rogelio Rocha Monjaraz (MD), Pablo R. December 31, 2016. Amtrak is seeking be considered as far as practicable.
Murillo (TX), Wayne Nicolaisen (PA), this temporary relief as it works to bring Anyone is able to search the
John R. Ogno (NJ), Richard A. Parker II 70 percent of its passenger rolling stock electronic form of any written
(KS), Vincent E. Perkins (MA), John R. fleet that was ordered prior to communications and comments
Price (AR), Francis D. Reginald, Jr. (NJ), September 8, 2000, and placed in received into any of our dockets by the
Juan A. Rodriguez (CT), Roger D. Rogers service prior to September 9, 2002, into name of the individual submitting the
(PA), Robert E. Rohrer (PA), David L. compliance with the emergency lighting comment (or signing the document, if
Roth (SD), James O. Russell, Jr. (OH), requirements. Amtrak justifies the need submitted on behalf of an association,
Ronald B. Salter (MS), Michael J. for this deadline extension because it business, labor union, etc.). In
Schmelzle (KS), Ralph J. Schmitt (CO), will need to test between 201 and 408 accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT
Charles D. Theademan (WA), Dwight cars across its fleets located at multiple solicits comments from the public to
Tullis (IL), Arnulfo J. Valenzuela (TX), locations spanning geographic areas better inform its processes. DOT posts
Danny L. Watson (TN), Lorenzo A. from the East Coast to the West Coast as these comments, without edit, including
Williams (DE), William E. Zezulka outlined in its petition. Amtrak any personal information the
(MN). indicates that this 70-percent commenter provides, to
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) modification goal may require www.regulations.gov, as described in
and 31315, each exemption will be valid modification to as many as 1,200 of the the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
for 2 years unless revoked earlier by passenger cars listed in its petition (the 14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked comprehensive listing of equipment www.dot.gov/privacy. See also http://
if: (1) The person fails to comply with includes Acela, TALGO, Surfliners, www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice
the terms and conditions of the Comets, Heritage, Superliner 1, for the privacy notice of regulations.gov.
exemption; (2) the exemption has Superliner 2, Amfleet 1, Amfleet 2,
Viewliner, Horizon, Metroliner, LDSL, Robert C. Lauby,
resulted in a lower level of safety than Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
was maintained before it was granted; or and various inspection cars).
A copy of the petition, as well as any Chief Safety Officer.
(3) continuation of the exemption would [FR Doc. 2016–00202 Filed 1–8–16; 8:45 am]
not be consistent with the goals and written communications concerning the
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. petition, is available for review online at BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
If the exemption is still effective at the www.regulations.gov and in person at
end of the 2-year period, the person may the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
apply to FMCSA for a renewal under
procedures in effect at that time. New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Federal Railroad Administration
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Issued on: December 30, 2015. Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m. [Docket No. FRA–2016–0001]
Larry W. Minor, to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
Associate Administrator for Policy. except Federal Holidays. Establishment of an Emergency Relief
[FR Doc. 2016–00294 Filed 1–8–16; 8:45 am] Interested parties are invited to Docket for Calendar Year 2016
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P participate in these proceedings by AGENCY: Federal Railroad
submitting written views, data, or Administration (FRA), Department of
comments. FRA does not anticipate Transportation (DOT).
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION scheduling a public hearing in
ACTION: Notice of establishment of
connection with these proceedings since
Federal Railroad Administration public docket (Notice).
the facts do not appear to warrant a
[Docket Number FRA–2015–0139] hearing. If any interested party desires SUMMARY: This Notice announces the
an opportunity for oral comment, they establishment of FRA’s emergency relief
Petition for Waiver of Compliance should notify FRA, in writing, before docket (ERD) for calendar year 2016.
the end of the comment period and The designated ERD for calendar year
In accordance with part 211 of Title specify the basis for their request. 2016 is Docket Number FRA–2016–
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), All communications concerning these 0001.
this document provides the public proceedings should identify the
notice that by a document dated ADDRESSES: See Supplementary
appropriate docket number FRA–2015–
September 22, 2015, the National Information section for further
ebenthall on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
0139 and may be submitted by any of
Railroad Passenger Corporation the following methods: information regarding submitting
(Amtrak) has petitioned the Federal • Web site: http:// petitions and/or comments to Docket
Railroad Administration (FRA) for a www.regulations.gov. Follow the online No. FRA–2016–0001.
waiver of compliance from certain instructions for submitting comments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
provisions of the Federal railroad safety • Fax: 202–493–2251. 19, 2009, FRA published a direct final
regulations contained at 49 CFR part • Mail: Docket Operations Facility, rule addressing the establishment of
238, Passenger Equipment Safety U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 ERDs and the procedures for handling
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:33 Jan 14, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM 11JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_1290/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-01-16 01:05:05
Document Modified: 2016-01-16 01:05:05
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of final disposition. | |
| Dates | The exemptions were granted November 3, 2015. The exemptions expire on November 3, 2017. | |
| Contact | Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-113, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 1284 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR