81_FR_12918 81 FR 12870 - Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative and New Shipper Reviews and Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2014-2015

81 FR 12870 - Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative and New Shipper Reviews and Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2014-2015

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 48 (March 11, 2016)

Page Range12870-12871
FR Document2016-05567

The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review and a concurrent new-shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate products (CTL plate) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. With respect to the administrative review, the Department preliminarily determines that the sole producer/exporter subject to the review, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM), made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. With respect to the new-shipper review, the Department preliminarily determines that Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 48 (Friday, March 11, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12870-12871]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05567]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-836]


Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From 
the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative and New Shipper Reviews and Rescission of Administrative 
Review, in Part; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review and a concurrent new-shipper review of the 
antidumping duty order on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel 
plate products (CTL plate) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The 
period of review (POR) is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. 
With respect to the administrative review, the Department preliminarily 
determines that the sole producer/exporter subject to the review, 
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM), made sales of subject merchandise 
at less than normal value. With respect to the new-shipper review, the 
Department preliminarily determines that Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai 
Steel) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal 
value. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary 
results.

DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Thomas Schauer, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-5760 or (202) 482-
0410, respectively.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the antidumping duty order are certain CTL 
plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently classified in the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 
7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 
7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 
7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 
7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000, 7225.50.6000, 
7225.99.0090, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, 7226.91.8000, and 
7226.99.0000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full 
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the memorandum from Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian 
Marsh to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled, ``Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum for the Administrative and New-Shipper Reviews 
of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-
Quality Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea'' dated 
concurrently with this notice and hereby adopted by this notice 
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tolling of Deadline of Preliminary Results of Reviews

    As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary 
for Enforcement & Compliance, the Department has exercised its 
discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent 
closure of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the 
proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised 
deadline for the preliminary results of these reviews is now March 4, 
2016.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S 
for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative 
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm 
Jonas'' dated January 27, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission of Administrative Review in Part

    We are rescinding the administrative review in part with respect to 
BDP International, Daewoo International Corp., GS Global Corp., Hyundai 
Glovis, Hyundai Steel, Iljin Steel, Samsung C&T Corporation, Samsung 
C&T Engineering & Construction Group, Samsung C&T Trading and 
Investment Group, Samsung Heavy Industries, and Steel N People Ltd.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4 for more details on 
this rescission in part. As noted in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum, we will not issue assessment instructions as a result of 
the administrative review rescission with respect to Hyundai Steel, 
given the ongoing new-shipper review. Id. n.14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department conducted these reviews in accordance with section 
751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export 
price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal 
value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the 
public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is 
available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all 
parties in the Department's Central Records Unit, located at room B8024 
of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.

Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review

    As a result of this administrative review, we preliminarily 
determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 1.11 percent exists 
for Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd., for the period February 1, 2014, 
through January 31, 2015.

Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review

    As a result of this new shipper review, we preliminarily determine 
that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for 
merchandise produced and exported by Hyundai Steel Company for the 
period February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015.

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these 
preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case 
briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, 
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case 
briefs.\4\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement 
of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of 
authorities.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS. An

[[Page 12871]]

electronically filed document must be received successfully in its 
entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 
p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice.\6\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and 
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of 
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to 
those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department will issue 
the final results of this administrative and new shipper review, 
including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any 
written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication 
of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is above de 
minimis in the final results of these reviews, we will calculate an 
importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the 
total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the importer's 
examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\7\ If the respondent's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of reviews, 
we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) not to assess 
duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification 
for Reviews.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 
Reviews).
    \8\ See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by DSM 
or Hyundai Steel for which they did not know their merchandise was 
destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
    We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of the final results of these reviews.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of these reviews for all 
shipments of CTL plate from Korea entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by 
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate with respect to 
the administrative review respondent will be the rate established in 
the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise exported by 
manufacturers or exporters not covered in these reviews but covered in 
a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue 
to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; 
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in these reviews, a prior 
review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period 
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for 
all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 0.98 
percent,\9\ the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value 
investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in the companion 
countervailing duty investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 
Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 22971, 22972 n.3 (April 
24, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to Hyundai Steel, the new shipper respondent, the 
Department established a combination cash deposit rate for this company 
consistent with its practice as follows: (1) For subject merchandise 
produced and exported by Hyundai Steel, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for Hyundai Steel in the final results of the NSR; 
(2) for subject merchandise exported by Hyundai Steel, but not produced 
by Hyundai Steel, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the all-
others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation; and 
(3) for subject merchandise produced by Hyundai Steel but not exported 
by Hyundai Steel, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to 
the exporter.
    These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    The Department is issuing and publishing these results in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), 777(i) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.214 and 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: March 4, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Rescission of Administrative Review in Part
Bona Fides Analysis
Comparisons to Normal Value
Determination of Comparison Method
Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
Product Comparisons
Date of Sale
Level of Trade/CEP Offset
Constructed Export Price
Normal Value
    1. Overrun Sales
    2. Selection of Comparison Market
    3. Affiliated Parties
    4. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test
    5. Cost of Production
    6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
Currency Conversion
Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2016-05567 Filed 3-10-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

12870 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices Dated: March 8, 2016. 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, calculated in accordance with section Glenna Mickelson, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 773 of the Act. Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, For a full description of the Information Officer. 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, methodology underlying our [FR Doc. 2016–05510 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] 7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000, conclusions, see the Preliminary BILLING CODE 3510–06–P 7225.50.6000, 7225.99.0090, Decision Memorandum. The 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 7226.91.8000, and 7226.99.0000. While public document and is made available DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the HTSUS subheadings are provided to the public via Enforcement and for convenience and customs purposes, Compliance’s Antidumping and International Trade Administration the written description is dispositive. A Countervailing Duty Centralized [A–580–836] full description of the scope of the order Electronic Service System (ACCESS). is contained in the Preliminary Decision ACCESS is available to registered users Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Memorandum.1 at http://access.trade.gov and to all Steel Plate Products From the parties in the Department’s Central Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results Tolling of Deadline of Preliminary Records Unit, located at room B8024 of of Antidumping Duty Administrative Results of Reviews the main Department of Commerce and New Shipper Reviews and As explained in the memorandum building. In addition, a complete Rescission of Administrative Review, from the Acting Assistant Secretary for version of the Preliminary Decision in Part; 2014–2015 Enforcement & Compliance, the Memorandum can be found at http:// Department has exercised its discretion enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, to toll all administrative deadlines due Preliminary Results of the Department of Commerce. to the recent closure of the Federal Administrative Review SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been As a result of this administrative (the Department) is conducting an extended by four business days. The review, we preliminarily determine that administrative review and a concurrent revised deadline for the preliminary a weighted-average dumping margin of new-shipper review of the antidumping results of these reviews is now March 4, 1.11 percent exists for Dongkuk Steel duty order on certain cut-to-length 2016.2 Mill Co., Ltd., for the period February 1, carbon-quality steel plate products (CTL 2014, through January 31, 2015. plate) from the Republic of Korea Rescission of Administrative Review in (Korea). The period of review (POR) is Part Preliminary Results of the New Shipper February 1, 2014, through January 31, Review 2015. With respect to the administrative We are rescinding the administrative review in part with respect to BDP As a result of this new shipper review, the Department preliminarily review, we preliminarily determine that determines that the sole producer/ International, Daewoo International Corp., GS Global Corp., Hyundai Glovis, a weighted-average dumping margin of exporter subject to the review, Dongkuk 0.00 percent exists for merchandise Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM), made sales Hyundai Steel, Iljin Steel, Samsung C&T Corporation, Samsung C&T Engineering produced and exported by Hyundai of subject merchandise at less than Steel Company for the period February normal value. With respect to the new- & Construction Group, Samsung C&T Trading and Investment Group, 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. shipper review, the Department preliminarily determines that Hyundai Samsung Heavy Industries, and Steel N Disclosure and Public Comment Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) did not People Ltd.3 We intend to disclose the calculations make sales of subject merchandise at Methodology performed for these preliminary results less than normal value. We invite to the parties within five days of the interested parties to comment on these The Department conducted these date of publication of this notice in preliminary results. reviews in accordance with section 751 accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2016. of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), (the Act). Constructed export price is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: interested parties may submit case briefs calculated in accordance with section Yang Jin Chun or Thomas Schauer, AD/ not later than 30 days after the date of 772 of the Act. Normal value is CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement publication of this notice. Rebuttal and Compliance, International Trade 1 See the memorandum from Deputy Assistant briefs, limited to issues raised in the Administration, U.S. Department of Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary case briefs, may be filed not later than Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Paul Piquado entitled, ‘‘Preliminary Decision five days after the date for filing case NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone Memorandum for the Administrative and New- briefs.4 Parties who submit case briefs or (202) 482–5760 or (202) 482–0410, Shipper Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Order rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate respectively. Products from the Republic of Korea’’ dated encouraged to submit with each concurrently with this notice and hereby adopted argument: (1) a statement of the issue, Scope of the Order by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). (2) a brief summary of the argument, The products covered by the 2 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron and (3) a table of authorities.5 antidumping duty order are certain CTL Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure interested parties who wish to request a classified in the Harmonized Tariff During Snowstorm Jonas’’ dated January 27, 2016. hearing, must submit a written request Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 3 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4 for to the Assistant Secretary for under subheadings 7208.40.3030, more details on this rescission in part. As noted in Enforcement and Compliance, filed 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we will not issue assessment instructions as a result of the electronically via ACCESS. An 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, administrative review rescission with respect to 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, Hyundai Steel, given the ongoing new-shipper 4 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, review. Id. n.14. 5 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Mar 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices 12871 electronically filed document must be warehouse, for consumption on or after The Department is issuing and received successfully in its entirety by the date of publication as provided by publishing these results in accordance the Department’s electronic records section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern deposit rate with respect to the 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 Time within 30 days after the date of administrative review respondent will and 351.221(b)(4). publication of this notice.6 Requests be the rate established in the final Dated: March 4, 2016. should contain: (1) The party’s name, results of the review; (2) for Paul Piquado, address and telephone number; (2) the merchandise exported by manufacturers Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and number of participants; and (3) a list of or exporters not covered in these Compliance. issues to be discussed. Issues raised in reviews but covered in a prior segment the hearing will be limited to those of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate Appendix raised in the respective case briefs. The will continue to be the company- List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Department will issue the final results specific rate published for the most Decision Memorandum of this administrative and new shipper recent period; (3) if the exporter is not Summary review, including the results of its a firm covered in these reviews, a prior Background analysis of the issues raised in any review, or the original investigation but Scope of the Order written briefs, not later than 120 days the manufacturer is, the cash deposit Rescission of Administrative Review in Part after the date of publication of this rate will be the rate established for the Bona Fides Analysis notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) most recent period for the manufacturer Comparisons to Normal Value of the Act. of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit Determination of Comparison Method rate for all other manufacturers or Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis Assessment Rates Product Comparisons exporters will continue to be 0.98 If a respondent’s weighted-average percent,9 the all-others rate established Date of Sale dumping margin is above de minimis in Level of Trade/CEP Offset in the less-than-fair-value investigation, the final results of these reviews, we Constructed Export Price adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in Normal Value will calculate an importer-specific the companion countervailing duty 1. Overrun Sales assessment rate on the basis of the ratio investigation. 2. Selection of Comparison Market of the total amount of antidumping With respect to Hyundai Steel, the 3. Affiliated Parties duties calculated for the importer’s new shipper respondent, the 4. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’s- examined sales and the total entered Department established a combination Length Test value of the sales in accordance with 19 cash deposit rate for this company 5. Cost of Production CFR 351.212(b)(1).7 If the respondent’s consistent with its practice as follows: 6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on weighted-average dumping margin is (1) For subject merchandise produced Comparison Market Prices zero or de minimis in the final results and exported by Hyundai Steel, the cash Currency Conversion of reviews, we will instruct U.S. Recommendation deposit rate will be the rate established Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for Hyundai Steel in the final results of [FR Doc. 2016–05567 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] not to assess duties on any of its entries the NSR; (2) for subject merchandise BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P in accordance with the Final exported by Hyundai Steel, but not Modification for Reviews.8 produced by Hyundai Steel, the cash For entries of subject merchandise deposit rate will be the rate for the all- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE during the POR produced by DSM or others rate established in the less-than- Hyundai Steel for which they did not fair-value investigation; and (3) for International Trade Administration know their merchandise was destined subject merchandise produced by [C–533–868] for the United States, we will instruct Hyundai Steel but not exported by CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at Hyundai Steel, the cash deposit rate will Countervailing Duty Investigation of the all-others rate if there is no rate for be the rate applicable to the exporter. Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From the intermediate company(ies) involved These cash deposit requirements, India: Preliminary Affirmative in the transaction. when imposed, shall remain in effect Determination and Alignment of Final We intend to issue liquidation until further notice. Determination With Final Antidumping instructions to CBP 15 days after Duty Determination publication of the final results of these Notification to Importers reviews. This notice serves as a preliminary AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, reminder to importers of their International Trade Administration, Cash Deposit Requirements responsibility under 19 CFR Department of Commerce. The following deposit requirements 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce will be effective upon publication of the regarding the reimbursement of (‘‘Department’’) preliminarily notice of final results of these reviews antidumping duties prior to liquidation determines that countervailable for all shipments of CTL plate from of the relevant entries during this POR. subsidies are being provided to Korea entered, or withdrawn from Failure to comply with this requirement producers and exporters of welded could result in the Department’s stainless pressure pipe (‘‘welded 6 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). presumption that reimbursement of stainless pipe’’) from India. The period asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 7 In these preliminary results, the Department antidumping duties occurred and the of investigation is January 1, 2014, applied the assessment rate calculation method through December 31, 2014. We invite adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation subsequent assessment of double of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and antidumping duties. interested parties to comment on this Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty preliminary determination. Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 9 See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2016. (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Reviews). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 8 See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 22971, 22972 n.3 (April Andrew Medley at (202) 482–4987, or 8102. 24, 2015). Amanda Mallott at (202) 482–6430, AD/ VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Mar 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1


Document Created: 2016-03-11 01:51:29
Document Modified: 2016-03-11 01:51:29
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ContactYang Jin Chun or Thomas Schauer, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-5760 or (202) 482- 0410, respectively.
FR Citation81 FR 12870 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR