81 FR 12871 - Countervailing Duty Investigation of Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 48 (March 11, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 48 (March 11, 2016)
| Page Range | 12871-12873 | |
| FR Document | 2016-05575 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 12871-12873] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-05575] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-868] Countervailing Duty Investigation of Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of welded stainless pressure pipe (``welded stainless pipe'') from India. The period of investigation is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. We invite interested parties to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Medley at (202) 482-4987, or Amanda Mallott at (202) 482-6430, AD/ [[Page 12872]] CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter, from India. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix II. Methodology The Department is conducting this countervailing duty (``CVD'') investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\1\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building, as well as electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. \2\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination'' (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Subsidy Allegations On January 20, 2016, Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corp, Outokumpu Stainless Pipe, Inc., and Marcegaglia USA (collectively, ``Petitioners'') submitted a request that the Department expand its investigation to include 16 additional subsidy programs.\3\ Based upon the information contained in Petitioner's New Subsidy Allegations and the Petition,\4\ the Department is initiating an investigation of 15 additional subsidy programs concurrently with this preliminary determination.\5\ For these 15 programs, we have determined that Petitioners alleged the necessary elements of a subsidy, i.e., financial contribution, benefit, and specificity in accordance with sections 771(5)(B) and 771(5A) of the Act. We also find that these allegations are supported by reasonably available information sufficient to warrant an investigation of these subsidy programs, in accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Act. We intend to examine these programs after the preliminary determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Letter from Petitioners, ``Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: New Subsidy Allegations'' (``New Subsidy Allegations'') dated January 20, 2016. \4\ See ``Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India,'' dated September 30, 2015 (``Petition''). \5\ See Memorandum to Brendan Quinn, Acting Director, Office III, ``Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from India: New Subsidy Allegations Initiation Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination and Suspension of Liquidation \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent closure of the Federal Government. See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the preliminary determination of this administrative review is now March 4, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with section 703(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, we calculated an individual rate for each producer/exporter of the subject merchandise individually investigated. In accordance with sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, for companies not individually examined, we apply an ``all-others'' rate, which is normally calculated by weighting the subsidy rates of the individual companies as respondents by those companies' exports of the subject merchandise to the United States. Under section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, the all- others rate should exclude zero and de minimis rates or any rates based entirely on facts otherwise available pursuant to section 776 of the Act. Accordingly, in these preliminary results, we have calculated the ``all-others'' rate by weight-averaging the calculated subsidy rates of the two individually investigated respondents, using the respondent's publicly-ranged sales data for exports of subject merchandise to the United States.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Memorandum to the File, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Preliminary Determination Margin Calculation for All-Others,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We preliminarily determine the countervailable subsidy rates to be: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Company Subsidy rate ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steamline Industries Limited.............. 2.96 percent. Sunrise Stainless Private Limited, Sun 6.21 percent. Mark Stainless Pvt. Ltd., and Shah Foils Ltd. (collectively, ``Sunrise Group''). All-Others................................ 4.55 percent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, we are directing U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of all entries of welded stainless pipe from India that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of the publication of this notice in the Federal Register, and to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise in the amounts indicated above. Verification As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the Act, we intend to verify the information submitted in response to the Department's questionnaires prior to making our final determination. Alignment On February 9, 2016, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Act, Petitioners requested an alignment of the final CVD determination with the final antidumping duty (``AD'') determination of welded stainless pipe from India.\8\ Therefore, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4), we are aligning the final CVD determination in this investigation with the final AD determination. Consequently, the final CVD determination will be issued on the same date as the final AD determination, which is currently scheduled to be issued no later than July 18, 2016, unless postponed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Letter from Petitioners, ``Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Request for Alignment,'' dated February 9, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose calculations performed for this [[Page 12873]] preliminary determination to the parties within five days of the date of public announcement of this determination in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven days after the date on which the final verification report is issued in this proceeding, and rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\9\ A table of contents, list of authorities used, and an executive summary of issues should accompany any briefs submitted to the Department, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). This summary should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically-filed request must be received successfully, and in its entirety, by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number; the number of participants; and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date, time, and specific location to be determined. Parties will be notified of the date, time, and location of any hearing. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 703(f) of the Act, we will notify the International Trade Commission (``ITC'') of our determination. In addition, we are making available to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information relating to this investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or under an administrative protective order, without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. In accordance with section 705(b)(2) of the Act, if our final determination is affirmative, the ITC will make its final determination within 45 days after the Department makes its final determination. This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 703(f) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: March 4, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope Comments IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Alignment VI. Injury Test VII. Subsidies Valuation VIII. Analysis of Programs IX. Calculation of the All-Others Rate X. ITC Notification XI. Disclosure and Public Comment XII. Verification XIII. Conclusion Appendix II Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. References to size are in nominal inches and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (``ASTM'') A-312 or ASTM A-778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A-358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A-312 or ASTM A-778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope of the investigation are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A-554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A-249, ASTM A-688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A- 269, ASTM A-270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. [FR Doc. 2016-05575 Filed 3-10-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices 12871
electronically filed document must be warehouse, for consumption on or after The Department is issuing and
received successfully in its entirety by the date of publication as provided by publishing these results in accordance
the Department’s electronic records section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B),
system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern deposit rate with respect to the 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214
Time within 30 days after the date of administrative review respondent will and 351.221(b)(4).
publication of this notice.6 Requests be the rate established in the final Dated: March 4, 2016.
should contain: (1) The party’s name, results of the review; (2) for Paul Piquado,
address and telephone number; (2) the merchandise exported by manufacturers
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
number of participants; and (3) a list of or exporters not covered in these
Compliance.
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in reviews but covered in a prior segment
the hearing will be limited to those of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate Appendix
raised in the respective case briefs. The will continue to be the company- List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Department will issue the final results specific rate published for the most Decision Memorandum
of this administrative and new shipper recent period; (3) if the exporter is not
Summary
review, including the results of its a firm covered in these reviews, a prior Background
analysis of the issues raised in any review, or the original investigation but Scope of the Order
written briefs, not later than 120 days the manufacturer is, the cash deposit Rescission of Administrative Review in Part
after the date of publication of this rate will be the rate established for the Bona Fides Analysis
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) most recent period for the manufacturer Comparisons to Normal Value
of the Act. of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit Determination of Comparison Method
rate for all other manufacturers or Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
Assessment Rates Product Comparisons
exporters will continue to be 0.98
If a respondent’s weighted-average percent,9 the all-others rate established Date of Sale
dumping margin is above de minimis in Level of Trade/CEP Offset
in the less-than-fair-value investigation,
the final results of these reviews, we Constructed Export Price
adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in Normal Value
will calculate an importer-specific the companion countervailing duty 1. Overrun Sales
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio investigation. 2. Selection of Comparison Market
of the total amount of antidumping With respect to Hyundai Steel, the 3. Affiliated Parties
duties calculated for the importer’s new shipper respondent, the 4. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’s-
examined sales and the total entered Department established a combination Length Test
value of the sales in accordance with 19 cash deposit rate for this company 5. Cost of Production
CFR 351.212(b)(1).7 If the respondent’s consistent with its practice as follows: 6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
weighted-average dumping margin is (1) For subject merchandise produced Comparison Market Prices
zero or de minimis in the final results and exported by Hyundai Steel, the cash Currency Conversion
of reviews, we will instruct U.S. Recommendation
deposit rate will be the rate established
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for Hyundai Steel in the final results of [FR Doc. 2016–05567 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am]
not to assess duties on any of its entries the NSR; (2) for subject merchandise BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
in accordance with the Final exported by Hyundai Steel, but not
Modification for Reviews.8 produced by Hyundai Steel, the cash
For entries of subject merchandise deposit rate will be the rate for the all- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
during the POR produced by DSM or others rate established in the less-than-
Hyundai Steel for which they did not fair-value investigation; and (3) for International Trade Administration
know their merchandise was destined subject merchandise produced by [C–533–868]
for the United States, we will instruct Hyundai Steel but not exported by
CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at Hyundai Steel, the cash deposit rate will Countervailing Duty Investigation of
the all-others rate if there is no rate for be the rate applicable to the exporter. Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From
the intermediate company(ies) involved These cash deposit requirements, India: Preliminary Affirmative
in the transaction. when imposed, shall remain in effect Determination and Alignment of Final
We intend to issue liquidation until further notice. Determination With Final Antidumping
instructions to CBP 15 days after Duty Determination
publication of the final results of these Notification to Importers
reviews. This notice serves as a preliminary AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
reminder to importers of their International Trade Administration,
Cash Deposit Requirements responsibility under 19 CFR Department of Commerce.
The following deposit requirements 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
will be effective upon publication of the regarding the reimbursement of (‘‘Department’’) preliminarily
notice of final results of these reviews antidumping duties prior to liquidation determines that countervailable
for all shipments of CTL plate from of the relevant entries during this POR. subsidies are being provided to
Korea entered, or withdrawn from Failure to comply with this requirement producers and exporters of welded
could result in the Department’s stainless pressure pipe (‘‘welded
6 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). presumption that reimbursement of stainless pipe’’) from India. The period
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7 In these preliminary results, the Department antidumping duties occurred and the of investigation is January 1, 2014,
applied the assessment rate calculation method through December 31, 2014. We invite
adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
subsequent assessment of double
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and antidumping duties. interested parties to comment on this
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty preliminary determination.
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 9 See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2016.
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea:
Reviews). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
8 See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 22971, 22972 n.3 (April Andrew Medley at (202) 482–4987, or
8102. 24, 2015). Amanda Mallott at (202) 482–6430, AD/
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Mar 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_12919/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices 12873
preliminary determination to the parties In accordance with section 705(b)(2) purposes only; the written description of the
within five days of the date of public of the Act, if our final determination is scope of this investigation is dispositive.
announcement of this determination in affirmative, the ITC will make its final [FR Doc. 2016–05575 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am]
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). determination within 45 days after the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Case briefs or other written comments Department makes its final
may be submitted to the Assistant determination.
Secretary for Enforcement and This determination is issued and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Compliance no later than seven days published pursuant to sections 703(f)
after the date on which the final International Trade Administration
and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
verification report is issued in this 351.205(c). [A–201–842]
proceeding, and rebuttal briefs, limited
to issues raised in case briefs, may be Dated: March 4, 2016.
Large Residential Washers From
submitted no later than five days after Paul Piquado, Mexico: Preliminary Results of the
the deadline date for case briefs.9 A Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Antidumping Duty Administrative
table of contents, list of authorities used, Compliance. Review; 2014–2015
and an executive summary of issues Appendix I
should accompany any briefs submitted AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
to the Department, pursuant to 19 CFR List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary International Trade Administration,
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). This summary Decision Memorandum Department of Commerce.
should be limited to five pages total, I. Summary SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
including footnotes. II. Background (the Department) is conducting an
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), III. Scope Comments administrative review of the
interested parties who wish to request a IV. Scope of the Investigation antidumping duty order on large
hearing must submit a written request to V. Alignment residential washers from Mexico. The
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement VI. Injury Test period of review (POR) is February 1,
VII. Subsidies Valuation 2014, through January 31, 2015. The
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
VIII. Analysis of Programs review covers one producer/exporter of
Commerce, filed electronically using IX. Calculation of the All-Others Rate
ACCESS. An electronically-filed request the subject merchandise, Electrolux
X. ITC Notification
must be received successfully, and in its XI. Disclosure and Public Comment Home Products Corp. N.V. and
entirety, by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. XII. Verification Electrolux Home Products de Mexico,
Eastern Time, within 30 days after the XIII. Conclusion S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Electrolux).
date of publication of this notice. We preliminarily determine that sales of
Requests should contain the party’s Appendix II subject merchandise by Electrolux have
name, address, and telephone number; Scope of the Investigation been made at prices below normal value
the number of participants; and a list of The merchandise covered by this (NV). We invite interested parties to
the issues to be discussed. If a request investigation is circular welded austenitic comment on these preliminary results.
for a hearing is made, the Department stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2016.
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. inches in outside diameter. References to size FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Department of Commerce, 14th Street are in nominal inches and include all Brian Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/
and Constitution Avenue NW., products within tolerances allowed by pipe CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
Washington, DC 20230, at a date, time, specifications. This merchandise includes,
but is not limited to, the American Society
and Compliance, International Trade
and specific location to be determined. for Testing and Materials (‘‘ASTM’’) A–312 Administration, U.S. Department of
Parties will be notified of the date, time, or ASTM A–778 specifications, or Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
and location of any hearing. Parties comparable domestic or foreign Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
should confirm by telephone the date, specifications. ASTM A–358 products are telephone: (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–
time, and location of the hearing two only included when they are produced to 1823.
days before the scheduled date. meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
specifications, or comparable domestic or
International Trade Commission foreign specifications. Scope of the Order
Notification Excluded from the scope of the
The products covered by the order are
In accordance with section 703(f) of investigation are: (1) Welded stainless
mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–554 or all large residential washers and certain
the Act, we will notify the International subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The
comparable domestic or foreign
Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) of our specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, products are currently classifiable under
determination. In addition, we are superheater, refining furnace, feedwater subheadings 8450.20.0040 and
making available to the ITC all non- heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM 8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff
privileged and non-proprietary A–249, ASTM A–688 or comparable System of the United States (HTSUS).
information relating to this domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) Products subject to this order may also
investigation. We will allow the ITC specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269, enter under HTSUS subheadings
access to all privileged and business ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080,
proprietary information in our files, foreign specifications.
The subject imports are normally classified 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
provided the ITC confirms that it will Although the HTSUS subheadings are
in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040,
not disclose such information, either provided for convenience and customs
7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and
publicly or under an administrative 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff purposes, the written description of the
protective order, without the written Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). merchandise subject to this scope is
consent of the Assistant Secretary for They may also enter under HTSUS dispositive.1
Enforcement and Compliance. subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015,
7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, 1 A full description of the scope of the order is
9 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings contained in the memorandum entitled ‘‘Large
(for general filing requirements). are provided for convenience and customs Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Mar 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_12919/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-03-11 01:51:28
Document Modified: 2016-03-11 01:51:28
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Andrew Medley at (202) 482-4987, or Amanda Mallott at (202) 482-6430, AD/ CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 12871 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR