81 FR 14516 - Movement of Roadway Maintenance Machines Over Highway-Rail Grade Crossings
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 52 (March 17, 2016)
Federal Railroad Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 52 (March 17, 2016)
| Page Range | 14516-14518 | |
| FR Document | 2016-05996 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 52 (Thursday, March 17, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 14516-14518] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-05996] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad Administration [Safety Advisory No. 2016-01] Movement of Roadway Maintenance Machines Over Highway-Rail Grade Crossings AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation. ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: FRA recently completed its investigation into a fatal accident that occurred when an on-track roadway maintenance machine traveling on main track collided with a motor vehicle at a highway-rail grade crossing. FRA is issuing this Safety Advisory 2016-01 to heighten rules compliance and situational awareness of railroads, railroad contractors, and their respective employees when operating roadway maintenance machines over highway-rail grade crossings. This Safety Advisory makes recommendations to railroads and railroad contractors regarding the need to review, update, and follow rules and procedures governing the safe movement of roadway maintenance equipment over highway-rail grade crossings. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick T. Warren, Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Compliance and Program Implementation, Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-1366; or Joseph Riley, Track Specialist, Track Division, Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6357. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In January 2015, a fatal accident occurred when an on-track roadway maintenance machine, traveling as part of a large roadway work group (rail gang) over main track, collided with a private motor vehicle at a public highway-rail grade crossing in Gilroy, California (Gilroy). The driver of the motor vehicle died as a result of the collision. While investigating this 2015 accident, FRA reviewed its accident data regarding other collisions at highway-rail grade crossings involving railroad maintenance-of-way equipment. FRA's review found that between January 2010 and November 2015, 187 accidents involving maintenance-of-way equipment and motor vehicles occurred at highway- rail grade crossings. The 187 accidents resulted in 2 fatalities to highway vehicle motorists, 62 injuries to motor vehicle occupants, and 6 injuries to railroad employees. The January 2015 accident referenced here and FRA's review of accident data described above illustrate the safety risk to railroad and railroad contractor employees and the public when roadway maintenance machines travel over highway-rail grade crossings. This risk is heightened when roadway maintenance machines, including hi-rail vehicles, fail to activate grade crossing warning devices. To reduce this safety risk, FRA recommends that the railroad industry evaluate relevant railroad rules and emphasize compliance with those rules and any other procedures governing the safe movement of on-track equipment over highway-rail grade crossings. Accident Summary The accident description provided below is based on FRA's investigation of the January 2015 accident and serves to illustrate the risks associated with moving railroad roadway maintenance machines over highway-rail grade crossings. On January 9, 2015, near Gilroy, a Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) system rail gang was in the process of changing job locations from a siding track to an industrial lead track approximately 12 miles away. The rail gang consisted of 62 pieces of roadway maintenance machinery moving over UP main track to a new job location under the authority of a train dispatcher. At approximately 1:05 p.m., a spiker/gager roadway maintenance machine (40th machine in the consist) was traveling approximately 12 miles per hour over the Masten Avenue highway-rail grade crossing in Gilroy and collided with a motor vehicle (pickup truck) as it proceeded westbound over the crossing. The driver was the sole occupant of the pickup truck and received fatal injuries. The spiker/gager operator was operating in reverse and was not facing the direction of the machine's movement, relying on side mirrors to see in the direction of movement. Additionally, a semi-tractor trailer had stopped short of the crossing for a traffic light and may have blocked the spiker/gager operator's view of westbound vehicular traffic approaching the highway-rail grade crossing. Applicable UP rules require that ``[t]rack cars and on-track equipment must approach all grade crossings prepared to stop and must yield the right-of-way to vehicular traffic. If necessary, personnel will be deployed to flag the crossing to protect movement of a track car or other on-track equipment.'' UP's rules further specify: When approaching any grade crossing equipped with automatic warning devices and the automatic warning devices are not activated, all track cars and on-track equipment must stop short of the crossing and not proceed until safe to do so, unless the crossing has been closed or barricaded or is protected by properly equipped flaggers. FRA's investigation indicates that the operator of the spiker/gager involved in the collision failed to follow applicable UP rules by not stopping short of the crossing and failing to yield the right-of-way to vehicle traffic. It appears that the spiker/gager had fallen several hundred feet behind the machine it was following and FRA's review of the downloaded grade crossing warning device data indicated the crossing gates had recovered (lifted) before the spiker/gager arrived at the crossing. Unlike trains, roadway maintenance machines do not always shunt or maintain shunt in track circuits to trigger activation of grade crossing warning device systems and, in most cases, roadway maintenance machines are not designed or built to shunt the track circuit. [[Page 14517]] FRA's investigation also indicates that before the rail gang equipment started its movement, a job briefing was held that identified the railroad's safety procedures to follow during the movement. The job briefing instructed the machine operators to ``bunch-up'' at grade crossings, allowing no more than 50 feet between equipment. The bunching-up of equipment is intended to allow the equipment to travel over highway-rail grade crossings in a safe and efficient manner, as well as to lessen the time the public is stopped at the crossing. The job briefing did not include instructions regarding theuse of flaggers to protect movements over highway-rail grade crossings. Rules Compliance, Situational Awareness, and Grade Crossing Protection Measures Generally, railroad rules govern the movement of roadway maintenance machines over highway-rail grade crossings.\1\ Under most applicable railroad rules governing movement of on-track equipment over highway-rail grade crossings, roadway maintenance machines do not have the right-of-way over vehicular traffic. Industry practices typically require such equipment to approach every highway-rail grade crossing prepared to stop and not proceed until it is seen that the grade crossing is clear. For example, under the applicable UP rule in question, roadway maintenance machines are required to stop when approaching a grade crossing with automatic warning devices when such devices are not activated unless the crossing has been closed or barricaded or is protected by properly equipped flaggers. When grade crossing warning devices are activated, machine operators must still be prepared to stop. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ FRA's grade crossing safety regulations in 49 CFR part 234 do not specifically address roadway maintenance machine movements over grade crossings. In addition, 49 CFR part 214, subpart C establishes protections to prevent roadway workers from being struck by rolling equipment, but does not mention, nor is it generally intended to address, movement of roadway maintenance machines in travel mode over highway-rail grade crossings under the authority of a train dispatcher. See 61 FR 65959, 65961 (Dec. 16, 1996). FRA conducted a post-accident inspection of the spiker/gager that was involved in the collision and found it was in compliance with applicable FRA regulations governing roadway maintenance machines at 49 CFR part 214, subpart D. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Most of the 187 accidents described above occurred while on-track equipment was traveling over a highway-rail grade crossing and not when roadway work groups were performing work at a crossing. FRA's review of the data indicates that tampers and regulators were involved in the highest number of roadway maintenance machine/highway vehicle accidents. Further, when railroads operate roadway maintenance machines singly or in pairs, machines may not be readily visible to motorists. Railroads and railroad contractors should develop procedures for the safe movement of all configurations of roadway work group equipment and ensure that operators are trained and qualified to recognize crossing characteristics that present greater safety risks. As mentioned above, roadway maintenance machines do not reliably shunt track circuits and may not always, or continually, activate highway-rail grade crossing warning devices. Operators may encounter a variety of challenging grade crossing characteristics, including: heavy vehicular traffic, long-angled four-lane crossings, right-turn-on-red locations, and highway traffic signals interconnected with the highway- rail grade crossing warning devices. Railroads should review their inventory of grade crossings and identify crossings that pose significant challenges to roadway maintenance machine operators. Railroads should also consider installing lockable wayside warning device activation equipment or other appropriate measures for use by operators of roadway maintenance machines at heavily trafficked four- lane crossings or long-angled crossings. FRA also recommends that railroads emphasize compliance with rules governing the safe movement of roadway maintenance machines over highway-rail grade crossings in job safety briefings and employee training. Railroads and railroad contractors should monitor employee compliance with rules addressing equipment movement over highway-rail grade crossings. On certain railroads where rules governing the safe movement of machines over crossings are contained in the railroads' operating rules, Federal regulation requires that each railroad conduct operational tests to ensure its employees comply with the railroad's operating rules. See 49 CFR 217.9. As the description of the January 2015 accident indicates, compliance with railroad rules governing the movement of on-track equipment over highway-rail grade crossings is safety-critical. FRA recommends that railroads evaluate their current procedures for monitoring compliance with rules governing the movement of roadway maintenance machines over highway-rail grade crossings and determine whether their procedures are sufficient. FRA is aware that some railroads have installed shunting devices on roadway maintenance machines, such as hi-rail vehicles, that can be switched on or off to activate grade crossing warning devices as a roadway maintenance machine approaches a crossing.\2\ FRA strongly recommends that railroads utilizing such devices stress to operators that such shunts are not fail-safe and may lose shunt without warning. Railroads should emphasize that roadway maintenance machine shunting devices should be utilized only as a supplement to compliance with railroad rules that govern the movement of roadway maintenance machines over highway-rail grade crossings. Operators of roadway maintenance machines should approach every crossing prepared to stop and yield the right-of-way to vehicular traffic unless the crossing has been closed or barricaded or is protected by properly equipped flaggers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Typically, railroads instruct machine operators to approach each crossing prepared to stop and not proceed into the crossing until the grade crossing is seen to be clear because a loss of shunt can occur in these situations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Railroad rules often establish minimum spacing requirements when roadway maintenance machines are travelling. The number of machines in large equipment groupings, such as the one described in the January 2015 accident above, can make it very difficult for machine operators to maintain appropriate spacing. The combined length of a large production gang's equipment may not permit movement over a crossing in a single unit. To avoid the impacts from improper machine spacing and to prevent accidents, FRA recommends that railroads utilize appropriately equipped flaggers \3\ to provide warning for motor vehicle traffic while large groups of roadway maintenance machines, such as the one in the accident described above, travel over a highway- rail grade crossing. Flag protection at highway-rail grade crossings reduces the risk of a collision. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See 49 CFR 234.5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, it is imperative that roadway maintenance machine operators exercise vigilance and awareness with regard to railroad rule requirements, equipment spacing, speed, and the status of active warning devices when approaching and traveling over highway-rail grade crossings. For movements over extended distances, rail-bound machines with turntables should be turned to run forward or flag protection should be provided at all highway-grade crossings. FRA encourages railroad management to adopt and adhere to policies that promote the safest course of action in conducting on-track equipment movements over highway-rail grade [[Page 14518]] crossings, particularly by taking into account the unique characteristics that exist at individual crossings. FRA also encourages the use of job briefings whenever work or job conditions change to heighten employees' situational awareness of relevant safety risks. Recommendations In light of the above discussion, and in an effort to improve situational awareness and rules compliance for roadway maintenance machine movements over highway-rail grade crossings, FRA recommends that railroads and railroad contractors: 1. Review with their roadway maintenance machine operators the circumstances of the fatal incident described in this Safety Advisory 2016-01 and these recommendations; 2. Review, and update as necessary, their rules and procedures governing the movement of roadway maintenance machines over highway- rail grade crossings and provide instruction on those rules and procedures to their employees; 3. Identify grade crossings that pose significant challenges to roadway maintenance machines traversing the crossings and consider installing lockable wayside warning-device activation equipment or other appropriate measures for use by roadway maintenance machine operators to ensure safe movement over such crossings; 4. Emphasize that their roadway maintenance machine operators must approach every highway-rail grade crossing prepared to stop and ensure that warning devices (where installed) are activated, the grade crossing is clear, and motor vehicle traffic has stopped (or is under the control of an appropriately equipped flagger) prior to entering a crossing; 5. Emphasize to their roadway maintenance machine operators that shunting devices are not fail-safe and may lose shunt without warning if railroad rules permit the use of roadway maintenance machine shunting devices (capable of being turned on or off to activate grade crossing warning devices). Railroads should also emphasize that roadway maintenance machine shunting devices should only be utilized as a supplement to compliance with rules requiring machine operators to approach crossings prepared to stop and to yield the right-of-way to vehicle traffic; 6. Emphasize the importance of job briefings to discuss applicable railroad rules governing operation of roadway maintenance machines movements over highway-rail grade crossing(s), including the identification of any higher-risk crossings and whether any crossings will be protected by appropriately equipped flaggers or signal personnel; 7. Ensure that when roadway maintenance machines are required to travel extended distances, their machine operators are able to operate this equipment while facing in the direction of the machine's movement; and 8. Review their current procedures for monitoring compliance with rules governing the movement of roadway maintenance machines over grade crossings and make necessary updates. Regularly conduct operational tests to ensure their employees comply with applicable rules governing movement over grade crossings. FRA encourages railroads and railroad contractors to take action consistent with the preceding recommendations and to take other actions to help ensure the safety of the Nation's railroad employees and the travelling public. FRA may modify this Safety Advisory 2016-01, issue additional safety advisories, or take other appropriate actions necessary to ensure the highest level of safety on the Nation's railroads, including pursuing other corrective measures under its rail safety authority. Robert C. Lauby, Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer. [FR Doc. 2016-05996 Filed 3-16-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
![14516 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 52 / Thursday, March 17, 2016 / Notices
Chief Safety Officer, FRA, 1200 New regarding the need to review, update, Gilroy, a Union Pacific Railroad
Jersey Avenue SE., Mailstop 25, and follow rules and procedures Company (UP) system rail gang was in
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493–6474. governing the safe movement of the process of changing job locations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant roadway maintenance equipment over from a siding track to an industrial lead
to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal highway-rail grade crossings. track approximately 12 miles away. The
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: rail gang consisted of 62 pieces of
463), FRA is giving notice of a meeting Patrick T. Warren, Deputy Associate roadway maintenance machinery
of the RSAC. The RSAC was established Administrator for Safety Compliance moving over UP main track to a new job
to provide advice and recommendations and Program Implementation, Office of location under the authority of a train
to FRA on railroad safety matters. The Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey dispatcher. At approximately 1:05 p.m.,
RSAC is composed of 60 voting Avenue SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, a spiker/gager roadway maintenance
representatives from 39 member DC 20590, (202) 493–1366; or Joseph machine (40th machine in the consist)
organizations, representing various rail Riley, Track Specialist, Track Division, was traveling approximately 12 miles
industry perspectives. In addition, there Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 per hour over the Masten Avenue
are non-voting advisory representatives New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 25, highway-rail grade crossing in Gilroy
from the agencies with railroad safety Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493–6357. and collided with a motor vehicle
regulatory responsibility in Canada and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In January (pickup truck) as it proceeded
Mexico, the National Transportation 2015, a fatal accident occurred when an westbound over the crossing. The driver
Safety Board, and the Federal Transit on-track roadway maintenance machine, was the sole occupant of the pickup
Administration. The diversity of the traveling as part of a large roadway work truck and received fatal injuries.
Committee ensures the requisite range group (rail gang) over main track, The spiker/gager operator was
of views and expertise necessary to collided with a private motor vehicle at operating in reverse and was not facing
discharge its responsibilities. See the a public highway-rail grade crossing in the direction of the machine’s
RSAC Web site for details on prior Gilroy, California (Gilroy). The driver of movement, relying on side mirrors to
RSAC activities and pending tasks at the motor vehicle died as a result of the see in the direction of movement.
http://rsac.fra.dot.gov/. Please refer to collision. Additionally, a semi-tractor trailer had
the notice published in the Federal While investigating this 2015 stopped short of the crossing for a traffic
Register on March 11, 1996 (61 FR accident, FRA reviewed its accident light and may have blocked the spiker/
9740), for additional information about data regarding other collisions at gager operator’s view of westbound
the RSAC. highway-rail grade crossings involving vehicular traffic approaching the
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 8, railroad maintenance-of-way highway-rail grade crossing. Applicable
2016. equipment. FRA’s review found that UP rules require that ‘‘[t]rack cars and
Robert C. Lauby, between January 2010 and November on-track equipment must approach all
2015, 187 accidents involving grade crossings prepared to stop and
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Chief Safety Officer. maintenance-of-way equipment and must yield the right-of-way to vehicular
motor vehicles occurred at highway-rail traffic. If necessary, personnel will be
[FR Doc. 2016–05997 Filed 3–16–16; 8:45 am]
grade crossings. The 187 accidents deployed to flag the crossing to protect
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
resulted in 2 fatalities to highway movement of a track car or other on-
vehicle motorists, 62 injuries to motor track equipment.’’ UP’s rules further
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vehicle occupants, and 6 injuries to specify:
railroad employees. When approaching any grade crossing
Federal Railroad Administration The January 2015 accident referenced equipped with automatic warning devices
here and FRA’s review of accident data and the automatic warning devices are not
[Safety Advisory No. 2016–01] activated, all track cars and on-track
described above illustrate the safety risk
to railroad and railroad contractor equipment must stop short of the crossing
Movement of Roadway Maintenance and not proceed until safe to do so, unless
Machines Over Highway-Rail Grade employees and the public when
the crossing has been closed or barricaded or
Crossings roadway maintenance machines travel is protected by properly equipped flaggers.
over highway-rail grade crossings. This
AGENCY: Federal Railroad risk is heightened when roadway FRA’s investigation indicates that the
Administration (FRA), Department of maintenance machines, including hi-rail operator of the spiker/gager involved in
Transportation. vehicles, fail to activate grade crossing the collision failed to follow applicable
ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory. warning devices. To reduce this safety UP rules by not stopping short of the
risk, FRA recommends that the railroad crossing and failing to yield the right-of-
SUMMARY: FRA recently completed its industry evaluate relevant railroad rules way to vehicle traffic. It appears that the
investigation into a fatal accident that and emphasize compliance with those spiker/gager had fallen several hundred
occurred when an on-track roadway rules and any other procedures feet behind the machine it was
maintenance machine traveling on main governing the safe movement of on-track following and FRA’s review of the
track collided with a motor vehicle at a equipment over highway-rail grade downloaded grade crossing warning
highway-rail grade crossing. FRA is crossings. device data indicated the crossing gates
issuing this Safety Advisory 2016–01 to had recovered (lifted) before the spiker/
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
heighten rules compliance and Accident Summary gager arrived at the crossing. Unlike
situational awareness of railroads, The accident description provided trains, roadway maintenance machines
railroad contractors, and their respective below is based on FRA’s investigation of do not always shunt or maintain shunt
employees when operating roadway the January 2015 accident and serves to in track circuits to trigger activation of
maintenance machines over highway- illustrate the risks associated with grade crossing warning device systems
rail grade crossings. This Safety moving railroad roadway maintenance and, in most cases, roadway
Advisory makes recommendations to machines over highway-rail grade maintenance machines are not designed
railroads and railroad contractors crossings. On January 9, 2015, near or built to shunt the track circuit.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:03 Mar 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM 17MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_14568/page/1.svg)
![14518 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 52 / Thursday, March 17, 2016 / Notices
crossings, particularly by taking into including the identification of any ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
account the unique characteristics that higher-risk crossings and whether any docket number MARAD–2016–0028.
exist at individual crossings. FRA also crossings will be protected by Written comments may be submitted by
encourages the use of job briefings appropriately equipped flaggers or hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
whenever work or job conditions change signal personnel; U.S. Department of Transportation,
to heighten employees’ situational 7. Ensure that when roadway Docket Operations, M–30, West
awareness of relevant safety risks. maintenance machines are required to Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Recommendations travel extended distances, their machine 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
operators are able to operate this Washington, DC 20590. You may also
In light of the above discussion, and equipment while facing in the direction send comments electronically via the
in an effort to improve situational of the machine’s movement; and Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
awareness and rules compliance for 8. Review their current procedures for All comments will become part of this
roadway maintenance machine monitoring compliance with rules docket and will be available for
movements over highway-rail grade governing the movement of roadway inspection and copying at the above
crossings, FRA recommends that maintenance machines over grade address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
railroads and railroad contractors: crossings and make necessary updates. E.T., Monday through Friday, except
1. Review with their roadway Regularly conduct operational tests to federal holidays. An electronic version
maintenance machine operators the ensure their employees comply with of this document and all documents
circumstances of the fatal incident applicable rules governing movement entered into this docket is available on
described in this Safety Advisory 2016– over grade crossings. the World Wide Web at http://
01 and these recommendations; www.regulations.gov.
FRA encourages railroads and railroad
2. Review, and update as necessary,
contractors to take action consistent FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
their rules and procedures governing the
with the preceding recommendations Bianca Carr, U.S. Department of
movement of roadway maintenance
and to take other actions to help ensure Transportation, Maritime
machines over highway-rail grade
the safety of the Nation’s railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey
crossings and provide instruction on
employees and the travelling public. Avenue SE., Room W23–453,
those rules and procedures to their
FRA may modify this Safety Advisory Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
employees;
3. Identify grade crossings that pose 2016–01, issue additional safety 366–9309, Email Bianca.carr@dot.gov.
significant challenges to roadway advisories, or take other appropriate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
maintenance machines traversing the actions necessary to ensure the highest described by the applicant the intended
crossings and consider installing level of safety on the Nation’s railroads, service of the vessel INVESTAR is:
lockable wayside warning-device including pursuing other corrective Intended Commercial Use of Vessel:
activation equipment or other measures under its rail safety authority. Charter Fishing
appropriate measures for use by Robert C. Lauby, Geographic Region: Florida, Georgia,
roadway maintenance machine Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, South Carolina, North Carolina,
operators to ensure safe movement over Chief Safety Officer. Alabama, Louisiana
such crossings; [FR Doc. 2016–05996 Filed 3–16–16; 8:45 am] The complete application is given in
4. Emphasize that their roadway BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DOT docket MARAD–2016–0028 at
maintenance machine operators must http://www.regulations.gov. Interested
approach every highway-rail grade parties may comment on the effect this
crossing prepared to stop and ensure DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION action may have on U.S. vessel builders
that warning devices (where installed) or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.-
are activated, the grade crossing is clear, Maritime Administration flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
and motor vehicle traffic has stopped (or accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
is under the control of an appropriately [Docket No. MARAD–2016 2016–0028] MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
equipped flagger) prior to entering a 388, that the issuance of the waiver will
crossing; Requested Administrative Waiver of have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.-
5. Emphasize to their roadway the Coastwise Trade Laws: Vessel vessel builder or a business that uses
maintenance machine operators that INVESTAR; Invitation for Public U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
shunting devices are not fail-safe and Comments waiver will not be granted. Comments
may lose shunt without warning if should refer to the docket number of
railroad rules permit the use of roadway AGENCY: Maritime Administration, this notice and the vessel name in order
maintenance machine shunting devices Department of Transportation. for MARAD to properly consider the
(capable of being turned on or off to ACTION: Notice. comments. Comments should also state
activate grade crossing warning the commenter’s interest in the waiver
devices). Railroads should also SUMMARY: As authorized by 46 U.S.C. application, and address the waiver
emphasize that roadway maintenance 12121, the Secretary of Transportation, criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
machine shunting devices should only as represented by the Maritime regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
be utilized as a supplement to Administration (MARAD), is authorized
compliance with rules requiring to grant waivers of the U.S.-build Privacy Act
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
machine operators to approach requirement of the coastwise laws under Anyone is able to search the
crossings prepared to stop and to yield certain circumstances. A request for electronic form of all comments
the right-of-way to vehicle traffic; such a waiver has been received by received into any of our dockets by the
6. Emphasize the importance of job MARAD. The vessel, and a brief name of the individual submitting the
briefings to discuss applicable railroad description of the proposed service, is comment (or signing the comment, if
rules governing operation of roadway listed below. submitted on behalf of an association,
maintenance machines movements over DATES: Submit comments on or before business, labor union, etc.). You may
highway-rail grade crossing(s), April 18, 2016. review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:03 Mar 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM 17MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_14568/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-03-17 00:58:04
Document Modified: 2016-03-17 00:58:04
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of Safety Advisory. | |
| Contact | Patrick T. Warren, Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Compliance and Program Implementation, Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-1366; or Joseph Riley, Track Specialist, Track Division, Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6357. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 14516 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR