81_FR_15293 81 FR 15238 - Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013

81 FR 15238 - Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 55 (March 22, 2016)

Page Range15238-15240
FR Document2016-06425

On December 14, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Final Results of the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order \1\ on aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for the January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013 period of review (POR).\2\ As explained below, the Department is amending the Final Results to correct the net subsidy rates for the Jangho Companies,\3\ non-selected cooperative respondents, and companies for which we applied total adverse facts available (AFA) in the Final Results. The amended final net subsidy rates are listed below in ``Amended Final Results of Administrative Review.'' \4\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15238-15240]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-068]


Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Amended 
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 14, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the Final Results of the administrative review of 
the countervailing duty (CVD) order \1\ on aluminum extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China (PRC) for the January 1, 2013, through 
December 31, 2013 period of review (POR).\2\ As explained below, the 
Department is amending the Final Results to correct the net subsidy 
rates for the Jangho Companies,\3\ non-selected cooperative 
respondents, and companies for which we applied total adverse facts 
available (AFA) in the Final Results. The amended final net subsidy 
rates are listed below in ``Amended Final Results of Administrative 
Review.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order).
    \2\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results, and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2013, 80 FR 77325, dated December 14, 2015 
(Final Results); Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul 
Piquado Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance 
regarding: ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from 
the People's Republic of China, 2013 (Third Review),'' December 7, 
2015 (Final Results Issues and Decision Memorandum).
    \3\ For purposes of this administrative review, the Jangho 
Companies includes Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering 
Co., Ltd., (Guangzhou Jangho); Jangho Group Co., Ltd. (Jangho Group 
Co.); Beijing Jiangheyuan Holding Co., Ltd (Beijing Jiangheyuan); 
Beijing Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. (Beijing 
Jangho); and Shanghai Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., 
Ltd., (Shanghai Jangho).
    \4\ On December 17, 2015, the Department issued a memorandum 
correcting certain inadvertent errors in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. See Memorandum to the File from Tyler Weinhold: 
``Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People's 
Republic of China: Errors in the Issues and Decision Memorandum for 
the Final Results of the 2013 Administrative Review,'' December 17, 
2015. We hereby incorporate that memorandum by reference in this 
notice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: March 22, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Davina Friedmann, Tyler Weinhold or 
Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-0698, (202) 482-1121 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 14, 2015, the Department published the Final 
Results.\5\ On December 15, 2015, the Jangho Companies alleged that 
certain ministerial errors were contained in the Final Results, and 
requested that the Department correct such errors.\6\ No other party 
has submitted ministerial error comments or rebuttal comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Final Results.
    \6\ See letter from the Jangho Companies to the Department 
regarding: ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of 
China: Ministerial Errors,'' December 15, 2015 (Ministerial Error 
Allegation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Before the Department could take action on the alleged ministerial 
errors, both Taizhou United Imp & Exp Co Ltd. and the Jangho Companies 
filed a summons and complaint with the U.S. Court of International 
Trade (``CIT'') challenging the Final Results, which vested the CIT 
with jurisdiction over the administrative proceeding.\7\ On February 8 
and 12, 2016, the CIT granted the Department leave to publish amended 
final results upon considering the ministerial error allegations.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Zenith Elecs. Corp. v. United States, 884 F.2d 556, 561-
62 (Fed. Cir. 1989).
    \8\ See Taizhou United Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. v. United States, 
CIT No. 16-00009; Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering 
Co., Ltd. et al v. United States, CIT No. 16-00012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum extrusions which 
are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from 
aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy 
series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing 
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other 
certifying body equivalents).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Final Results Issues and Decision Memorandum for a 
complete description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the 
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS): 9031.90.90.95, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 
7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 
7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 
8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 
7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 
7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 
8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 
8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 
8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 
8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 
8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 
8306.30.00.00, 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 
8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 
8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8515.90.20.00, 8516.90.50.00, 
8516.90.80.50, 8708.80.65.90, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 
9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 
9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 
9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 
9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 
9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.30, 
9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61,

[[Page 15239]]

9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 
9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 
9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 
9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 
9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 
9603.90.80.50
    The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products 
may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76 
subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as 
under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be 
classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. 
While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is 
dispositive.

Correction to the Final Results

    As discussed in the memoranda accompanying this notice, and which 
are hereby adopted by this notice, we determine that the Final Results 
contained two ministerial errors.\10\ First, in Guangzhou Jangho's 
glass for less than adequate remuneration (LTAR) purchases and benefits 
spreadsheet, we inadvertently referenced the wrong column in the 
transaction-specific benefits formulas for Guangzhou Jangho's glass 
purchases. We have corrected this error by modifying the relevant 
formula to refer to the correct column. Second, in Shanghai Jangho's 
aluminum extrusions for LTAR purchases and benefits spreadsheet, the 
formulas used to reference monthly aluminum extrusions benchmark prices 
were returning the value for the wrong month in certain instances, and 
in some instances we had used incorrect formulas. We have corrected 
these errors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold and Davina Friedmann, 
through Robert James, program Manager, Office VI, to Scot Fullerton, 
Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, regarding: ``Administrative 
Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China: Ministerial Error Allegation,'' dated 
concurrently with this memorandum (Amended Final Results Decision 
Memorandum), and Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold through Robert 
James, Program Manager, Office VI, to the File, regarding: 
``Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final 
Results Analysis Memorandum for the Jangho Companies,'' dated 
concurrently with this memorandum (Amended Final Analysis Memorandum 
for the Jangho Companies).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment to Rates for Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    In light of the above corrections, for the 38 companies for which a 
review was requested and not rescinded, but were not selected as 
mandatory respondents, we have recalculated the net subsidy rate which 
is based on the overall subsidy rates calculated for the mandatory 
respondents of this review.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For further information see Memorandum from Davina 
Friedmann and Tyler Weinhold, Case Analysts, to Robert James, 
Program Manager, Office VI, AD/CVD Operations, regarding: 
``Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Non-Selected Rate 
Calculation Memorandum for the Amended Final Results,'' dated 
concurrently with these amended final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have also recalculated the net subsidy rate assigned to those 
companies for which we applied AFA in the Final Results because the AFA 
rate includes the individual subsidy rates determined for the glass for 
LTAR and aluminum extrusions for LTAR programs.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For further information see Memorandum from Davina 
Friedmann and Tyler Weinhold, Case Analysts, to Robert James, 
Program Manager, Office VI, AD/CVD Operations, regarding: 
``Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: AFA Calculation 
Memorandum for the Amended Final Results,'' dated concurrently with 
these amended final results of review.
    \13\ Because the net subsidy rate for the Guang Ya Group did not 
change as a result of these amended final results, their net subsidy 
rate remains the same as was published in the Final Results. See 
Final Results, 80 FR 77325, 77327.
    \14\ In the Final Results, the Department misspelled the name of 
this company. This error has been corrected for these amended final 
results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of Administrative Review

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e) we determine the following 
amended final net subsidy rates for the 2013 administrative review:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Ad Valorem
                         Company                             rate \13\
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allied Maker Limited....................................           28.01
Alnan Aluminum Co. Ltd..................................           28.01
Bracalente Metal Producers (Suzhou) Co. Ltd \14\........           28.01
Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd................           28.01
Classic & Contemporary Inc..............................           28.01
Danfoss Micro Channel Heat Exchanger (Jia Xing) Co. Ltd.           28.01
Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd......           28.01
Dynamic Technologies China Ltd..........................          187.86
Ever Extend Ent. Ltd....................................           28.01
Fenghua Metal Product Factory...........................           28.01
Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & High Tech Industrial            187.86
 Development Zone.......................................
Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.....          187.86
Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group.................          187.86
Guandong JMA Aluminum Profile (Group) Co., Ltd..........           28.01
Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co. Ltd.......           28.01
Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited..............           28.01
Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd................................           28.01
Hangyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd........................           28.01
Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances, Co., Ltd........           28.01
IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd..............           28.01
IDEX Technology Suzhou Co., Ltd.........................           28.01
Jangho Companies........................................           29.18
Jiangsu Susun Group (HK) Co., Ltd.......................           28.01
Justhere Co., Ltd.......................................           28.01
Kromet International Inc................................           28.01
Metaltek Group Co. Ltd..................................           28.01
North Fenghua Aluminum Limited..........................           28.01
Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.........................           28.01
Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co., Ltd................           28.01
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd.............................           28.01
Permasteelisa South China Factory.......................           28.01
Sapa Profiles (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.......................           28.01
Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing              28.01
 Co., Ltd...............................................
Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co., Ltd..           28.01
Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum Extrusion Co., Ltd........           28.01
Taizhou United Imp & Exp Co Ltd.........................           28.01
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd...........................           28.01
Union Industry (Asia) Co., Limited......................           28.01
Whirlpool Microwave Products Development Ltd............           28.01
WTI Building Products, Ltd..............................          187.86
Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Ltd..............          187.86
Zhejiang Dongfeng Refrigeration Components Co. Ltd......           28.01
Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited............           28.01
Zhongshan Daya Hardware Co., Ltd........................           28.01
Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd..................           28.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions 
directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these amended final 
results of review, to liquidate appropriate shipments of subject 
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, at the ad valorem 
rates listed above.

[[Page 15240]]

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash 
deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts indicated 
above for each company listed above on shipments of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after 
December 14, 2015, the date of publication of the Final Results. For 
all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect 
cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent 
company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as 
appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice. We will disclose the 
calculations performed for these amended final results to interested 
parties within five business days of the date of publication of this 
notice.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1), 751(h), and 777(i)(1) of the Act; and 19 CFR 
351.224(e) and (h).

    Dated: March 15, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-06425 Filed 3-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

15238 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices VI. Scope Comments below, the Department is amending the February 8 and 12, 2016, the CIT VII. All-Others Rate Final Results to correct the net subsidy granted the Department leave to publish VIII. Discussion of Methodology rates for the Jangho Companies,3 non- amended final results upon considering A. Determination of the Comparison selected cooperative respondents, and the ministerial error allegations.8 Method companies for which we applied total B. Results of the Differential Pricing Scope of the Order Analysis adverse facts available (AFA) in the C. Application of Facts Available and Final Results. The amended final net The merchandise covered by the Adverse Inferences subsidy rates are listed below in Order is aluminum extrusions which are 1. Application of Facts Available With an ‘‘Amended Final Results of shapes and forms, produced by an Adverse Inference Administrative Review.’’ 4 extrusion process, made from aluminum 2. Selection of Information Used as Facts DATES: Effective Date: March 22, 2016. alloys having metallic elements Available FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: corresponding to the alloy series 3. Selection and Corroboration of the AFA designations published by The Rate Davina Friedmann, Tyler Weinhold or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Aluminum Association commencing IX. Date of Sale with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or X. Product Comparisons Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, proprietary equivalents or other XI. Constructed Export Price XII. Normal Value U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th certifying body equivalents).9 A. Comparison Market Viability Imports of the subject merchandise Street and Constitution Avenue NW., B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’s- are provided for under the following Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) Length Test categories of the Harmonized Tariff 482–0698, (202) 482–1121 or (202) 482– C. Level of Trade Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 0649, respectively. D. Cost of Production Analysis 9031.90.90.95, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 1. Calculation of COP SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices Background 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 3. Results of the COP Test 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, E. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison- On December 14, 2015, the 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, Market Prices Department published the Final 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, XIII. Currency Conversion Results.5 On December 15, 2015, the 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, XIV. Adjustments to Cash Deposit Rates For Jangho Companies alleged that certain Export Subsidies in the Companion 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10, ministerial errors were contained in the Countervailing Duty Investigation 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, Final Results, and requested that the XV. Conclusion 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30, Department correct such errors.6 No 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, [FR Doc. 2016–06449 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am] other party has submitted ministerial 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P error comments or rebuttal comments. Before the Department could take 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, action on the alleged ministerial errors, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE both Taizhou United Imp & Exp Co Ltd. 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, and the Jangho Companies filed a 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50, International Trade Administration summons and complaint with the U.S. 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’) 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65, [C–570–068] 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, challenging the Final Results, which Aluminum Extrusions From the vested the CIT with jurisdiction over the 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85, administrative proceeding.7 On 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, People’s Republic of China: Amended 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00, Final Results of Countervailing Duty 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, Administrative Review; 2013 Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China, 2013 (Third 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Review),’’ December 7, 2015 (Final Results Issues 8422.90.06.40, 8479.90.85.00, International Trade Administration, and Decision Memorandum). 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80, 3 For purposes of this administrative review, the Department of Commerce. Jangho Companies includes Guangzhou Jangho 8503.00.95.20, 8515.90.20.00, SUMMARY: On December 14, 2015, the Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd., 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, Department of Commerce (the (Guangzhou Jangho); Jangho Group Co., Ltd. (Jangho 8708.80.65.90, 9401.90.50.81, Group Co.); Beijing Jiangheyuan Holding Co., Ltd 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, Department) published the Final Results (Beijing Jiangheyuan); Beijing Jangho Curtain Wall of the administrative review of the System Engineering Co., Ltd. (Beijing Jangho); and 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, countervailing duty (CVD) order 1 on Shanghai Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, aluminum extrusions from the People’s Co., Ltd., (Shanghai Jangho). 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, Republic of China (PRC) for the January 4 On December 17, 2015, the Department issued 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, a memorandum correcting certain inadvertent 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013 errors in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. See period of review (POR).2 As explained Memorandum to the File from Tyler Weinhold: 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, ‘‘Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 Errors in the Issues and Decision Memorandum for 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order). the Final Results of the 2013 Administrative asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Review,’’ December 17, 2015. We hereby 9403.90.80.30, 9403.90.80.41, 2 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results, and Partial incorporate that memorandum by reference in this 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative notice. 5 See Final Results. 8 See Taizhou United Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. v. Review; 2013, 80 FR 77325, dated December 14, 6 See letter from the Jangho Companies to the United States, CIT No. 16–00009; Guangzhou 2015 (Final Results); Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Department regarding: ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul the People’s Republic of China: Ministerial Errors,’’ et al v. United States, CIT No. 16–00012. Piquado Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and December 15, 2015 (Ministerial Error Allegation). 9 See Final Results Issues and Decision Compliance regarding: ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 7 See Zenith Elecs. Corp. v. United States, 884 Memorandum for a complete description of the the Final Results of Countervailing Duty F.2d 556, 561–62 (Fed. Cir. 1989). scope of the Order. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices 15239 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, Amendment to Rates for Non-Selected Ad Valorem 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, Companies Under Review Company rate 13 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, (percent) In light of the above corrections, for 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, the 38 companies for which a review Foshan Shunde Aoneng 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, was requested and not rescinded, but Electrical Appliances Co., 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, were not selected as mandatory Ltd ..................................... 187.86 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, Golden Dragon Precise Cop- respondents, we have recalculated the per Tube Group ................ 187.86 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, net subsidy rate which is based on the Guandong JMA Aluminum 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, overall subsidy rates calculated for the Profile (Group) Co., Ltd .... 28.01 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and mandatory respondents of this review.11 Guangdong Whirlpool Elec- trical Appliances Co. Ltd ... 28.01 9603.90.80.50 We have also recalculated the net Guangdong Zhongya Alu- The subject merchandise entered as subsidy rate assigned to those minum Company Limited .. 28.01 companies for which we applied AFA Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd ..... 28.01 parts of other aluminum products may Hangyung Metal (Suzhou) be classifiable under the following in the Final Results because the AFA Co., Ltd ............................. 28.01 additional Chapter 76 subheadings: rate includes the individual subsidy Henan New Kelong Electrical 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and rates determined for the glass for LTAR Appliances, Co., Ltd .......... 28.01 and aluminum extrusions for LTAR IDEX Dinglee Technology 7616.99 as well as under other HTSUS (Tianjin) Co., Ltd ............... 28.01 chapters. In addition, fin evaporator programs.12 IDEX Technology Suzhou coils may be classifiable under HTSUS Amended Final Results of Co., Ltd ............................. 28.01 Jangho Companies ............... 29.18 numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and Administrative Review Jiangsu Susun Group (HK) 8418.99.80.60. While HTSUS In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e) Co., Ltd ............................. 28.01 subheadings are provided for Justhere Co., Ltd .................. 28.01 we determine the following amended Kromet International Inc. ...... 28.01 convenience and customs purposes, the final net subsidy rates for the 2013 Metaltek Group Co. Ltd ........ 28.01 written description of the scope of this administrative review: North Fenghua Aluminum Order is dispositive. Limited ............................... 28.01 Ad Valorem Nidec Sankyo Singapore Correction to the Final Results Company rate 13 Pte. Ltd .............................. 28.01 Nanhai Textiles Import & Ex- (percent) port Co., Ltd ...................... 28.01 As discussed in the memoranda Permasteelisa Hong Kong accompanying this notice, and which Allied Maker Limited ............. 28.01 Ltd ..................................... 28.01 are hereby adopted by this notice, we Alnan Aluminum Co. Ltd ...... 28.01 Permasteelisa South China Bracalente Metal Producers determine that the Final Results (Suzhou) Co. Ltd 14 ........... 28.01 Factory .............................. 28.01 contained two ministerial errors.10 First, Sapa Profiles (Shanghai) Changzhou Changzheng Co., Ltd ............................. 28.01 in Guangzhou Jangho’s glass for less Evaporator Co., Ltd ........... 28.01 Shanghai Tongtai Precise than adequate remuneration (LTAR) Classic & Contemporary Inc. 28.01 Aluminum Alloy Manufac- Danfoss Micro Channel Heat turing Co., Ltd ................... 28.01 purchases and benefits spreadsheet, we Exchanger (Jia Xing) Co. Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum inadvertently referenced the wrong Ltd ..................................... 28.01 Industry Engineering Co., column in the transaction-specific Dongguan Golden Tiger Ltd ..................................... 28.01 Hardware Industrial Co., Taishan City Kam Kiu Alu- benefits formulas for Guangzhou Ltd ..................................... 28.01 Jangho’s glass purchases. We have minum Extrusion Co., Ltd 28.01 Dynamic Technologies China Taizhou United Imp & Exp corrected this error by modifying the Ltd ..................................... 187.86 Co Ltd ............................... 28.01 relevant formula to refer to the correct Ever Extend Ent. Ltd ............ 28.01 tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Fenghua Metal Product Fac- column. Second, in Shanghai Jangho’s Ltd ..................................... 28.01 tory .................................... 28.01 Union Industry (Asia) Co., aluminum extrusions for LTAR Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou Limited ............................... 28.01 purchases and benefits spreadsheet, the New & High Tech Indus- trial Development Zone ..... 187.86 Whirlpool Microwave Prod- formulas used to reference monthly ucts Development Ltd ....... 28.01 aluminum extrusions benchmark prices WTI Building Products, Ltd ... 187.86 11 For further information see Memorandum from Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum were returning the value for the wrong Davina Friedmann and Tyler Weinhold, Case Factory Company Ltd ....... 187.86 month in certain instances, and in some Analysts, to Robert James, Program Manager, Office Zhejiang Dongfeng Refrig- instances we had used incorrect VI, AD/CVD Operations, regarding: ‘‘Administrative eration Components Co. Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Ltd ..................................... 28.01 formulas. We have corrected these Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Zhongya Shaped Aluminum errors. Non-Selected Rate Calculation Memorandum for (HK) Holding Limited ......... 28.01 the Amended Final Results,’’ dated concurrently Zhongshan Daya Hardware 10 See Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold and with these amended final results of review. Co., Ltd ............................. 28.01 Davina Friedmann, through Robert James, program 12 For further information see Memorandum from Zhaoqing New Zhongya Alu- Manager, Office VI, to Scot Fullerton, Director, AD/ Davina Friedmann and Tyler Weinhold, Case minum Co., Ltd ................. 28.01 CVD Operations, Office VI, regarding: Analysts, to Robert James, Program Manager, Office ‘‘Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty VI, AD/CVD Operations, regarding: ‘‘Administrative Assessment Rates Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Republic of China: Ministerial Error Allegation,’’ Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: The Department intends to issue AFA Calculation Memorandum for the Amended appropriate assessment instructions asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES dated concurrently with this memorandum (Amended Final Results Decision Memorandum), Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with these amended final results of review. directly to CBP 15 days after publication and Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold through Robert James, Program Manager, Office VI, to the 13 Because the net subsidy rate for the Guang Ya of these amended final results of review, File, regarding: ‘‘Administrative Review of Group did not change as a result of these amended to liquidate appropriate shipments of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum final results, their net subsidy rate remains the same subject merchandise entered, or Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: as was published in the Final Results. See Final withdrawn from warehouse, for Amended Final Results Analysis Memorandum for Results, 80 FR 77325, 77327. the Jangho Companies,’’ dated concurrently with 14 In the Final Results, the Department misspelled consumption on or after January 1, this memorandum (Amended Final Analysis the name of this company. This error has been 2013, through December 31, 2013, at the Memorandum for the Jangho Companies). corrected for these amended final results of review. ad valorem rates listed above. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1

15240 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices Cash Deposit Requirements DATES: Effective: March 22, 2016. classification is provided for The Department also intends to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cara convenience and customs purposes; instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of Lofaro or Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD however, the written description of the estimated countervailing duties in the Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and scope is dispositive.4 amounts indicated above for each Compliance, International Trade Methodology company listed above on shipments of Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue The Department is conducting this subject merchandise entered, or review in accordance with section withdrawn from warehouse, for NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5720 and (202) 482–0182, 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as consumption on or after December 14, amended (the ‘‘Act’’) and 19 CFR 2015, the date of publication of the respectively. 351.214. For a full description of the Final Results. For all non-reviewed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: methodology underlying our firms, we will instruct CBP to continue conclusions, see the Preliminary to collect cash deposits of estimated Background Decision Memorandum, which is hereby countervailing duties at the most recent On August 27, 2015, the Department adopted by this notice. The Preliminary company-specific or all-others rate published a notice of initiation of a new Decision Memorandum is a public applicable to the company, as shipper review of the antidumping duty document and is on file electronically appropriate. These cash deposit order on xanthan gum from the PRC.1 via Enforcement and Compliance’s requirements, when imposed, shall The Department subsequently issued an Antidumping and Countervailing Duty remain in effect until further notice. We antidumping duty questionnaire, and Centralized Electronic Service System will disclose the calculations performed supplemental questionnaires, to IMJ and (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to for these amended final results to received timely responses thereto. Also, registered users at http:// interested parties within five business interested parties submitted comments access.trade.gov and is available in the days of the date of publication of this on surrogate country and surrogate Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of notice. value selection. the main Department of Commerce We are issuing and publishing these The Department has exercised its building. In addition, a complete results in accordance with sections discretion to toll all administrative version of the Preliminary Decision 751(a)(1), 751(h), and 777(i)(1) of the deadlines due to the recent closure of Memorandum can be accessed directly Act; and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (h). the Federal Government because of at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. Dated: March 15, 2016. Snowstorm ‘‘Jonas.’’ Thus, all of the The signed Preliminary Decision Paul Piquado, deadlines in this segment of the Memorandum and the electronic Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and proceeding have been extended by four version of the Preliminary Decision Compliance. business days. The revised deadline for Memorandum are identical in content. [FR Doc. 2016–06425 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am] the preliminary results of this review, after the four business-day extension, Preliminary Rescission of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P was February 23, 2016.2 However, on Antidumping New Shipper Review of February 17, 2016, the Department IMJ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE extended the time period for issuing the As discussed in the Bona Fide Sales preliminary results of this NSR by 21 Analysis Memorandum,5 the International Trade Administration days, until March 15, 2016.3 Department preliminarily finds that the sale made by IMJ’s affiliate in the [A–570–985] Scope of the Order United States, Jianlong USA, is not a The scope of the order covers dry bona fide sale. The Department reached Xanthan Gum From the People’s xanthan gum, whether or not coated or this conclusion based on the totality of Republic of China: Preliminary blended with other products. Further, the circumstances surrounding the Rescission of 2014–2015 Antidumping xanthan gum is included in this order reported sale, including the sales price, Duty New Shipper Review regardless of physical form, including, in conjunction with the timing of the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, but not limited to, solutions, slurries, sale and the facts surrounding the International Trade Administration, dry powders of any particle size, or establishment and operations of IMJ’s Department of Commerce. unground fiber. Merchandise covered by U.S. affiliate, Jianlong USA. Because the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce the scope of this order is classified in (‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 4 For a complete description of the scope of the shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the (‘‘HTS’’) of the United States at order, see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the antidumping duty order on xanthan Preliminary Rescission of the 2014–2015 subheading 3913.90.20. This tariff Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of gum from the People’s Republic of Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The NSR covers one 1 See Xanthan Gum From the People’s Republic China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant exporter and producer of subject of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Shipper Review, 80 FR 52031 (August 27, 2015) Operations, to Paul Piquado Assistant Secretary for merchandise, Inner Mongolia Jianlong (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). Enforcement and Compliance (‘‘Preliminary Biochemical Co., Ltd. (‘‘IMJ’’). The 2 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Decision Memorandum’’), dated concurrently with period of review (‘‘POR’’) is July 1, 2014 Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for this notice. through June 30, 2015. The Department Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 5 See Memorandum from Cara Lofaro and preliminarily determines that IMJ did Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Brandon Farlander, International Trade Analysts, Government Closure during Snowstorm Jonas,’’ Office IV AD/CVD Operations, to Abdelali not satisfy the regulatory requirements dated January 27, 2016. Elouaradia, Director, Office IV, AD/CVD Operations to request an NSR and did not make a 3 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy entitled ‘‘2014–2015 Antidumping Duty New bona fide sale during the POR; Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Shipper Review of Xanthan Gum From the People’s therefore, we are preliminarily Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘New Shipper Republic of China: Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Review of Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic Analysis for Inner Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical rescinding this NSR. Interested parties of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with and hereby are invited to comment on the Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper adopted by this notice (‘‘Bona Fide Sales Analysis preliminary results of this review. Review,’’ dated February 17, 2016. Memorandum’’). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1


Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:15:54
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:15:54
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective Date: March 22, 2016.
ContactDavina Friedmann, Tyler Weinhold or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0698, (202) 482-1121 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
FR Citation81 FR 15238 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR