81 FR 15249 - Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Seabird Research Activities in Central California, 2016-2017

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 55 (March 22, 2016)

Page Range		15249-15260
FR Document		2016-06317
NMFS (hereinafter, ``we'' or ``our'') received an application from Point Blue Conservation Science (Point Blue) requesting an Incidental Harassment Authorization (Authorization) to take marine mammals, by harassment, incidental to conducting proposed seabird research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore in central California from May 2016 through May 2017. Per the Marine Mammal Protection Act, we request comments on our proposal to issue an Authorization to Point Blue to incidentally take, by Level B harassment only, five species [i.e., California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris), northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus), and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus)] of marine mammals during the specified activity.
Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15249-15260]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XE468


Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; 
Seabird Research Activities in Central California, 2016-2017

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request 
for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS (hereinafter, ``we'' or ``our'') received an application 
from Point Blue Conservation Science (Point Blue) requesting an 
Incidental Harassment Authorization (Authorization) to take marine 
mammals, by harassment, incidental to conducting proposed seabird 
research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo 
Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore in central California from 
May 2016 through May 2017. Per the Marine Mammal Protection Act, we 
request comments on our proposal to issue an Authorization to Point 
Blue to incidentally take, by Level B harassment only, five species 
[i.e., California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), Pacific harbor 
seal (Phoca vitulina), northern elephant seal (Mirounga 
angustirostris), northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus), and Steller 
sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus)] of marine mammals during the specified 
activity.

DATES: NMFS must receive comments and information no later than April 
21, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Address comments on the application to Jolie Harrison, 
Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910. The mailbox address for providing email 
comments is [email protected]. You must include 0648-XE468 in the 
subject line. We are not responsible for email comments sent to 
addresses other than the one provided here. Comments sent via email, 
including all attachments, must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size. 
NMFS is not responsible for email comments sent to addresses other than 
the one provided here.
    Instructions: All submitted comments are a part of the public 
record and NMFS will post them to http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/research.htm without change. All Personal Identifying 
Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by 
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential 
business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
    To obtain an electronic copy of the 2016 renewal request, the 2015 
application, our draft Environmental Assessment (EA), or a list of the 
references, write to the previously mentioned address, telephone the 
contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or visit the 
Internet at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/research.htm.
    Information in Point Blue's application, our draft EA and this 
notice collectively provide the environmental information related to 
the proposed issuance of the Authorization for public review and 
comment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robt Pauline, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS (301) 427-8401.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act 
of 1972, as amended (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary 
of Commerce to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not 
intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals of a species or 
population stock, by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity 
(other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region 
if, after NMFS provides a notice of a proposed authorization to the 
public for review and comment: (1) NMFS makes certain findings; and (2) 
the taking is limited to harassment.
    An Authorization for incidental takings for marine mammals shall be 
granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on 
the species or stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on 
the availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where 
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements 
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting of such taking 
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 
as ``an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be 
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely 
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of 
recruitment or survival.''

Summary of Request

    On September 29, 2015, NMFS received an application from Point Blue

[[Page 15250]]

requesting the taking by harassment of marine mammals incidental to 
conducting seabird research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, 
A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore in central 
California. Point Blue, along with partners Oikonos Ecosystem Knowledge 
and Point Reyes National Seashore, plan to conduct the proposed 
activities for one year. These partners are conducting this research 
under cooperative agreements with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 
consultation with the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. 
Following the initial application submission, Point Blue submitted an 
updated version of their application on February 23, 2016. We 
considered the revised renewal request for 2016-2017 activities as 
adequate and complete on February 25, 2016.
    On December 24, 2015 (80 FR 80321), we published a Federal Register 
notice announcing our issuance of a revised Authorization (effective 
through January 30, 2016) to Point Blue to take marine mammals by 
harassment, incidental to conducting the same activities presented in 
this notice of proposed Authorization. The revised Authorization 
increased the number of authorized take for California sea lions from 
approximately 9,871 to 44,871 due to Point Blue encountering 
unprecedented numbers of California sea lions hauled out in survey 
areas due to warming environmental conditions in the Pacific Ocean 
offshore California--which researchers have attributed to a current El 
Nino event.
    For the 2016-2017 research seasons, Point Blue again proposes to 
monitor and census seabird colonies; observe seabird nesting habitat; 
restore nesting burrows; and resupply a field station. The proposed 
activities would occur over the course of one year between May 2016 and 
May 2017.
    The following aspects of the proposed seabird research activities 
have the potential to take marine mammals: (1) Acoustic stimuli from 
noise generated by motorboat approaches and departures; (2) noise 
generated during the resupplying of the field station; and (3) visual 
stimuli from human presence during seabird research activities. 
California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, northern elephant seals, 
northern fur seals, and Steller sea lions hauled out in areas on 
Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, or within Point 
Reyes National Seashore may flush into the water or exhibit temporary 
modification in behavior and/or low-level physiological effects (Level 
B harassment). Thus, Point Blue has requested an Authorization to take 
44,871 California sea lions, 343 harbor seals, 196 northern elephant 
seals, and 106 Steller sea lions by Level B harassment only. Point Blue 
did not request take for northern fur seals in their application. 
However, as explained later in this document, we have considered the 
potential for Point Blue's activities to take a small number of this 
species.
    To date, we have issued seven, one-year Authorizations (and one 
revised Authorization) to Point Blue for the conduct of the same 
activities from 2007 to 2016 (72 FR 71121, December 14, 2007; 73 FR 
77011, December 18, 2008; 75 FR 8677, February 19, 2010; 77 FR 73989, 
December 7, 2012; 78 FR 66686, November 6, 2013; and 80 FR 10066, 
February 25, 2015, 80 FR 80321, December 24, 2015). This is Point 
Blue's eighth request for an Authorization. Their current Authorization 
expired on January 30, 2016 and the monitoring report associated with 
the 2015-2016 Authorization is available at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/research.htm. The report provides additional 
environmental information related to proposed issuance of this 
Authorization for public review and comment.

Description of the Specified Activity

Overview

Seabird Research on Southeast Farallon Island
    Point Blue proposes to conduct: (1) daily observations of seabird 
colonies at a maximum frequency of three 15-minute visits per day; and 
(2) conduct daily observations of breeding common murres (Uria aalge) 
at a maximum frequency of one, five-hour visit per day in September. 
These activities usually involve one or two observers conducting daily 
censuses of seabirds or conducting mark/recapture studies of breeding 
seabirds on Southeast Farallon Island. The researchers plan to access 
the island's two landing areas, the North Landing and the East Landing, 
by 14 to 18 feet (ft) (4.3 to 5.5 meters [m]) open motorboats which are 
hoisted onto the island using a derrick system and then travel by foot 
to coastal areas of the island to view breeding seabirds from behind an 
observation blind.
    The potential for incidental take related to the mark/recapture 
studies is very low as these activities are conducted within the 
interior of the island away from the intertidal areas where the 
pinnipeds haul out. Most potential for incidental take would occur when 
the researchers approach or depart the intertidal area by motorboat or 
when the researchers walk within 50 ft (15.2 m) of the haul-out areas 
to enter the observation blinds to observe shorebirds.
Field Station Resupply on Southeast Farallon Island
    Point Blue proposes to resupply the field station once every two 
weeks at a maximum frequency of 26 visits. Resupply activities involve 
personnel approaching either the North Landing or East Landing by 
motorboat. At East Landing--the primary landing site--all personnel 
assisting with the landing would stay on the loading platform 
approximately 30 ft (9.1 m) above the water. At North Landing, loading 
operations would occur at the water level in the intertidal areas. Most 
potential for incidental take would occur when the researchers approach 
the area by motorboat or when the researchers load or unload supplies 
onshore.
Seabird Research on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island
    Point Blue and its partners propose to monitor seabird burrow 
nesting habitat quality and to conduct habitat restoration at a maximum 
frequency of 20 visits per year. This activity involves two to three 
researchers accessing the north side of the island by a 12 ft (3.7 m) 
Zodiac boat. Once onshore, the researchers will check subterranean nest 
boxes and restore any nesting habitat for approximately 15 minutes.
    Most potential for incidental take would occur at the landing beach 
on the north side of the island when the researchers arrive and depart 
to check the boxes. Non-breeding pinnipeds may occasionally be present, 
including California sea lions that may be hauled out near a small 
group of subterranean seabird nest boxes on the island terrace. In both 
locations researchers will be more than 50 ft (15.2 m) away from any 
potentially hauled out pinnipeds.
Seabird Research on Point Reyes National Seashore
    The National Park Service in collaboration with Point Blue monitors 
seabird breeding and roosting colonies; conducts habitat restoration; 
removes non-native plants; monitors intertidal areas; and maintains 
coastal dune habitat. Seabird monitoring usually involves one or two 
observers conducting the survey by small boats (12 to 22 ft; 3.6 to 6.7 
m) along the Point Reyes National Seashore shoreline. Researchers would 
visit the site at a maximum frequency of 20 times per year, with an 
emphasis on increasing monitoring during the nesting season. 
Researchers would conduct occasional, intermittent visits during the 
rest of the

[[Page 15251]]

year. A majority of the research occurs in areas where marine mammals 
are not present. However, the potential for incidental harassment will 
occur at the landing beaches along Point Reyes Headland, boat ramps, or 
parking lots where northern elephant seals, harbor seals, or California 
sea lions may be hauled out in the vicinity.

Dates and Duration

    Point Blue proposes to conduct the seabird research activities over 
the course of one year. The proposed Authorization, if issued, would be 
effective from May 1, 2016, through April 30, 2017.

Description of the Specified Geographic Region

    The proposed activities would occur in the vicinity of pinniped 
haul-out sites located on Southeast Farallon Island (37[deg]41'54.32'' 
N.; 123[deg]0'8.33'' W.), A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island (37[deg]6'29.25'' N.; 
122[deg]20'12.20'' W.), or within Point Reyes National Seashore 
(37[deg]59'38.61'' N.; 122[deg]58'24.90'' W.) in central California. 
The proposed action area consists of the following three locations in 
the northeast Pacific Ocean:

South Farallones Islands

    The South Farallon Islands consist of Southeast Farallon Island 
located at 37[deg]41'54.32'' N.; 123[deg]0'8.33'' W. and West End 
Island. These two islands are directly adjacent to each other and 
separated by only a 30-foot (ft) (9.1 meter (m)) channel. The South 
Farallon Islands have a land area of approximately 120 acres (0.49 
square kilometers (km)) and are part of the Farallon National Wildlife 
Refuge. The islands are located near the edge of the continental shelf 
28 miles (mi) (45.1 km) west of San Francisco, CA, and lie within the 
waters of the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary.

A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island

    A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island located at 37[deg]6'29.25'' N.; 
122[deg]20'12.20'' W. is one-quarter mile (402 m) offshore of 
A[ntilde]o Nuevo Point in San Mateo County, CA. This small 25-acre (0.1 
square km) island is part of the A[ntilde]o Nuevo State Reserve, all of 
which is owned and operated by California State Parks. The Island lies 
within the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and the A[ntilde]o 
Nuevo State Marine Conservation Area.

Point Reyes National Seashore

    Point Reyes National Seashore located is approximately 40 miles 
(64.3 km) north of San Francisco Bay and also lies within the Gulf of 
the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. The proposed research areas 
(Life Boat Station, Drakes Beach, and Point Bonita) are within the 
headland coastal areas of the National Park.
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P

[[Page 15252]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22MR16.000


[[Page 15253]]


BILLING CODE 3510-22-C

Description of the Marine Mammals in the Area of the Proposed Specified 
Activity

    The marine mammals most likely to be harassed incidental to 
conducting seabird research at the proposed research areas on Southeast 
Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National 
Seashore are primarily California sea lions, northern elephant seals, 
Pacific harbor seals, and to a lesser extent the eastern distinct 
population segment (DPS) of the Steller sea lion. NMFS presents general 
information on these species in the next section. NMFS refers the 
public to Carretta et al. (2015) and Muto and Angliss (2015) for 
additional information on the status, distribution, seasonal 
distribution, and life history of these species. The publications are 
available on the Internet at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/draft.htm.

Northern Elephant Seal

    Northern elephant seals are not listed as threatened or endangered 
under the Endangered Species Act, nor are they categorized as depleted 
under the MMPA. The estimated population of the California Breeding 
Stock is approximately 179,000 animals and the current population trend 
is increasing at 3.8 percent annually (Carretta et al., 2015).
    Northern elephant seals range in the eastern and central North 
Pacific Ocean, from as far north as Alaska and as far south as Mexico. 
Northern elephant seals spend much of the year, generally about nine 
months, in the ocean. They are usually underwater, diving to depths of 
about 1,000 to 2,500 ft (330-800 m) for 20- to 30-minute intervals with 
only short breaks at the surface. They are rarely seen out at sea for 
this reason. While on land, they prefer sandy beaches.
    Northern elephant seals breed and give birth in California (U.S.) 
and Baja California (Mexico), primarily on offshore islands (Stewart et 
al., 1994), from December to March (Stewart and Huber, 1993). Males 
feed near the eastern Aleutian Islands and in the Gulf of Alaska, and 
females feed farther south, south of 45 [deg]N. (Stewart and Huber, 
1993; Le Boeuf et al., 1993). Adults return to land between March and 
August to molt, with males returning later than females. Adults return 
to their feeding areas again between their spring/summer molting and 
their winter breeding seasons.
    At Point Reyes, the population ranges from 1,500 and 2,000 animals 
(NPS, 2013a). Adult northern elephant seals visit Point Reyes twice a 
year (NPS, 2013a). They arrive in early winter from their feeding 
grounds off Alaska and the largest congregations occur in the winter, 
when the females arrive to deliver their pups and nurse them, and in 
spring when immature seals and adult females return to molt. During the 
time they are onshore they are fasting (NPS, 2013b).
    At Southeast Farallon, the population consists of approximately 500 
animals (FNMS, 2013). Northern elephant seals began recolonizing the 
South Farallon Islands in the early 1970s (Stewart et al., 1994) at 
which time the colony grew rapidly. In 1983 a record 475 pups were born 
on the South Farallones (Stewart et al., 1994). Since then, the size of 
the South Farallones colony has declined, stabilizing in the early 
2000s and then declining further over the past six years (USFWS, 2013). 
In 2012, a total of 90 cows were counted on the South Farallones, and 
60 pups were weaned (USFWS, 2013). Point Blue's average monthly counts 
from 2000 to 2009 ranged from 20 individuals in July to nearly 500 
individuals in November (USFWS, 2013).
    Northern elephant seals are present on the islands and in the 
waters surrounding the South Farallones year-round for either breeding 
or molting; however, they are more abundant during breeding and peak 
molting seasons (Le Boeuf and Laws, 1994; Sydeman and Allen, 1997). 
They live and feed in deep, offshore waters the remainder of the year.
    In mid-December, adult males begin arriving on the South 
Farallones, closely followed by pregnant females on the verge of giving 
birth. Females give birth to a single pup, generally in late December 
or January (Le Boeuf and Laws, 1994) and nurse their pups for 
approximately four weeks (Reiter et al., 1978). Upon pup weaning, 
females mate with an adult male and then depart the islands. The last 
adult breeders depart the islands in mid-March. The spring peak of 
elephant seals on the rookery occurs in April, when females and 
immature seals (approximately one to four years old) arrive at the 
colony to molt (a one month process) (USFWS, 2013). The year's new pups 
remain on the island throughout both of these peaks, generally leaving 
by the end of April (USFWS, 2013).
    The lowest numbers of elephant seals present on the rookery occurs 
during June, July, and August, when sub-adult and adult males molt. 
Another peak of young seals return to the rookery for a haul-out period 
in October, and at that time some individuals undergo partial molt (Le 
Boeuf and Laws, 1994). At A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island the population ranges 
from 900 to 1,000 adults.
    Observers first sighted elephant seals on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island 
in 1955 and today the population ranges from 900 to 1,000 adults (M. 
Lowry, unpubl. data). Males began to haul out on the mainland in 1965. 
California State Park reports that by 1988/1989, approximately 2,000 
elephant seals came ashore to A[ntilde]o Nuevo (CSP, 2012).

California Sea Lion

    The estimated population of the U.S. stock of California sea lion 
is approximately 296,750 animals and the current maximum population 
growth rate is 12 percent (Carretta et al., 2015). California sea lions 
are not listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species 
Act, nor are they categorized as depleted under the MMPA. The 
California sea lion is now a full species, separated from the Galapagos 
sea lion (Z. wollebaeki) and the extinct Japanese sea lion (Z. 
japonicus) (Brunner, 2003, Wolf et al., 2007, Schramm et al., 2009).
    California sea lion breeding areas are on islands located in 
southern California, in western Baja California, Mexico, and the Gulf 
of California. During the breeding season, most California sea lions 
inhabit southern California and Mexico. Rookery sites in southern 
California are limited to the San Miguel Islands and the southerly 
Channel Islands of San Nicolas, Santa Barbara, and San Clemente 
(Carretta et al., 2015). Males establish breeding territories during 
May through July on both land and in the water. Females come ashore in 
mid-May and June where they give birth to a single pup approximately 
four to five days after arrival and will nurse pups for about a week 
before going on their first feeding trip. Females will alternate 
feeding trips with nursing bouts until the pup is weaned between four 
and 10 months of age (NMML, 2010).
    Adult and juvenile males will migrate as far north as British 
Columbia, Canada while females and pups remain in southern California 
waters in the non-breeding season. In warm water (El Ni[ntilde]o) 
years, some females are found as far north as Washington and Oregon, 
presumably following prey.
    The U.S. stock of California sea lion is the only stock present in 
the proposed research area and in recent years, California sea lions 
have begun to breed annually in small numbers at Southeast Farallon and 
A[ntilde]o Nuevo Islands.
    On the Farallon Islands, California sea lions haul out in many 
intertidal areas year round, fluctuating from several hundred to 
several thousand animals.

[[Page 15254]]

California sea lions at Point Reyes National Seashore haul out at only 
a few locations, but will occur on human structures such as boat ramps. 
The annual population averages around 300 to 500 during the fall 
through spring months, although on occasion, several thousand sea lions 
can arrive depending upon local prey resources (S. Allen, unpublished 
data). On A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, California sea lions may haul out at 
one of eight beach areas on the perimeter of the island (see Point 
Blue's Application). The island's average population ranges from 4,000 
to 9,500 animals (M. Lowry, unpublished data).

Pacific Harbor Seal

    Pacific harbor seals are not listed as threatened or endangered 
under the Endangered Species Act, nor are they categorized as depleted 
under the MMPA. The estimated population of the California stock of 
harbor seals is 30,196 animals (Carretta et al., 2015).
    The animals inhabit near-shore coastal and estuarine areas from 
Baja California, Mexico, to the Pribilof Islands in Alaska. Pacific 
harbor seals are divided into two subspecies: P. v. stejnegeri in the 
western North Pacific, near Japan, and P. v. richardsi in the northeast 
Pacific Ocean. The latter subspecies, recognized as three separate 
stocks, inhabits the west coast of the continental United States, 
including: The outer coastal waters of Oregon and Washington states; 
Washington state inland waters; and Alaska coastal and inland waters.
    In California, over 500 harbor seal haul-out sites are widely 
distributed along the mainland and offshore islands, and include rocky 
shores, beaches and intertidal sandbars (Lowry et al., 2005). Harbor 
seals mate at sea and females give birth during the spring and summer, 
although, the pupping season varies with latitude. Pups are nursed for 
an average of 24 days and are ready to swim minutes after being born. 
Harbor seal pupping takes place at many locations and rookery size 
varies from a few pups to many hundreds of pups.
    In California, over 500 harbor seal haul-out sites are widely 
distributed along the mainland and offshore islands, and include rocky 
shores, beaches and intertidal sandbars (Lowry et al., 2005). On the 
Farallon Islands, approximately 40 to 120 Pacific harbor seals haul out 
in the intertidal areas (Point Blue unpublished data). Harbor seals at 
Point Reyes National Seashore haul out at nine locations with an annual 
population of up to 4,000 animals (M. Lowry, unpublished data). On 
A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, harbor seals may haul out at one of eight 
beach areas on the perimeter of the island (see Figure 2 in Point 
Blue's Application) and the island's average population ranges from 100 
to 150 animals (M. Lowry, unpublished data).

Northern Fur Seal

    Northern fur seals occur from southern California north to the 
Bering Sea and west to the Sea of Okhotsk and Honshu Island of Japan. 
NMFS recognizes two separate stocks of northern fur seals within U.S. 
waters: An Eastern Pacific stock distributed among sites in Alaska, 
British Columbia; and a California stock distributed along the west 
coast of the continental U.S. The estimated population of the 
California stock is 14,050 animals with a maximum population growth 
rate of 12 percent (Carretta et al., 2015).
    Northern fur seals may temporarily haul out on land at other sites 
in Alaska, British Columbia, and on islets along the west coast of the 
continental United States, but generally this occurs outside of the 
breeding season (Fiscus, 1983).
    Northern fur seals breed in Alaska and migrate along the west coast 
during fall and winter. Due to their pelagic habitat, they are rarely 
seen from shore in the continental U.S., but individuals occasionally 
come ashore on islands well offshore (i.e., Farallon Islands and 
Channel Islands in California). During the breeding season, 
approximately 74 percent of the worldwide population inhabits the 
Pribilof Islands in Alaska, with the remaining animals spread 
throughout the North Pacific Ocean (Lander and Kajimura, 1982).

Steller Sea Lion

    Steller sea lions consist of two distinct population segments: The 
western and eastern distinct population segments (DPS) divided at 144 
[deg]West longitude (Cape Suckling, Alaska). The western segment of 
Steller sea lions inhabit central and western Gulf of Alaska, Aleutian 
Islands, as well as coastal waters and breed in Asia (e.g., Japan and 
Russia). The eastern segment includes sea lions living in southeast 
Alaska, British Columbia, California, and Oregon. The eastern DPS 
includes animals born east of Cape Suckling, AK (144 [deg]W.) and the 
latest abundance estimate for the stock is 60,131 to 74,448 animals 
(Muto and Angliss, 2015). The eastern DPS of Steller sea lion is not 
listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, 
but is categorized as depleted under the MMPA.
    Steller sea lions range along the North Pacific Rim from northern 
Japan to California (Loughlin et al., 1984), with centers of abundance 
and distribution in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands, 
respectively. The species is not known to migrate, but individuals 
disperse widely outside of the breeding season (late May through early 
July), thus potentially intermixing with animals from other areas.
    The eastern distinct population segment of Steller sea lions breeds 
on rookeries located in southeast Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon, and 
California. There are no rookeries located in Washington. Steller sea 
lions give birth in May through July and breeding commences a couple of 
weeks after birth. Pups are weaned during the winter and spring of the 
following year.
    Despite the wide-ranging movements of juveniles and adult males in 
particular, exchange between rookeries by breeding adult females and 
males (other than between adjoining rookeries) appears low, although 
males have a higher tendency to disperse than females (NMFS, 1995; 
Trujillo et al., 2004; Hoffman et al., 2006). A northward shift in the 
overall breeding distribution has occurred, with a contraction of the 
range in southern California and new rookeries established in 
southeastern Alaska (Pitcher et al., 2007).
    The current population of Steller sea lions in the proposed 
research area is estimated to number between 50 and 750 animals. 
Overall, counts of non-pups at trend sites in California and Oregon 
have been relatively stable or increasing slowly since the 1980s (Muto 
and Angliss, 2015).
    Point Blue estimates that between 50 and 150 Steller sea lions live 
on the Farallon Islands. On Southeast Farallon Island, the abundance of 
females declined an average of 3.6 percent per year from 1974 to 1997 
(Sydeman and Allen, 1999).
    The National Marine Fisheries Service's Southwest Fisheries Science 
Center estimates between 400 and 600 live on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island 
(Point Blue unpublished data, 2008; Southwest Fisheries Science Center 
unpublished data, 2008). At A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island off central 
California, a steady decline in ground counts started around 1970, and 
there was an 85 percent reduction in the breeding population by 1987 
(LeBoeuf et al., 1991). Pup counts at A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island declined 
five percent annually through the 1990s (NOAA Stock Assessment, 2003), 
and have apparently stabilized between 2001 and 2005 (M. Lowry, SWFSC 
unpublished data). In 2000, the combined pup estimate for both islands 
was 349. In 2005, the pup estimate was 204 on the Island. Pup counts on 
the Farallon Islands have generally varied from five to 15

[[Page 15255]]

(Hastings and Sydeman, 2002; Point Blue unpublished data). Pups have 
not been born at Point Reyes Headland since the 1970s and Steller sea 
lions are seen in very low numbers there currently (S. Allen, 
unpublished data).

Other Marine Mammals in the Proposed Action Area

    California (southern) sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis), listed as 
threatened under the Endangered Species Act and categorized as depleted 
under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, usually range in coastal waters 
within two km of shore. Point Blue has not encountered California sea 
otters on Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, or Point 
Reyes National Seashore during the course of seabird or pinniped 
research activities over the past five years. This species is managed 
by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and is not considered further in 
this notice.

Potential Effects of the Specified Activities on Marine Mammals and 
Their Habitat

    This section includes a summary and discussion of the ways that 
components of the specified activity (e.g., exposure to vessel noise 
and approaches and human presence), including mitigation, may impact 
marine mammals. The ``Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment'' section 
later in this document will include a quantitative analysis of the 
number of individuals that we expect Point Blue to take during this 
activity. The ``Negligible Impact Analysis'' section will include the 
analysis of how this specific activity would impact marine mammals. We 
will consider the content of the following sections: ``Estimated Take 
by Incidental Harassment'' and ``Proposed Mitigation'' to draw 
conclusions regarding the likely impacts of these activities on the 
reproductive success or survivorship of individuals--and from that 
consideration--the likely impacts of this activity on the affected 
marine mammal populations or stocks.
    In the following discussion, we provide general background 
information on sound and marine mammal hearing. Acoustic and visual 
stimuli generated by: (1) Motorboat operations; and (2) the appearance 
of researchers may have the potential to cause Level B harassment of 
any pinnipeds hauled out on Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo 
Island, or Point Reyes National Seashore. The effects of sounds from 
motorboat operations and the appearance of researchers might include 
hearing impairment or behavioral disturbance (Southall, et al., 2007).

Hearing Impairment

    Marine mammals produce sounds in various important contexts--social 
interactions, foraging, navigating, and responding to predators. The 
best available science suggests that pinnipeds have a functional aerial 
hearing sensitivity between 75 hertz (Hz) and 75 kilohertz (kHz) and 
can produce a diversity of sounds, though generally from 100 Hz to 
several tens of kHz (Southall, et al., 2007).
    Exposure to high intensity sound for a sufficient duration may 
result in auditory effects such as a noise-induced threshold shift--an 
increase in the auditory threshold after exposure to noise (Finneran, 
Carder, Schlundt, and Ridgway, 2005). Factors that influence the amount 
of threshold shift include the amplitude, duration, frequency content, 
temporal pattern, and energy distribution of noise exposure. The 
magnitude of hearing threshold shift normally decreases over time 
following cessation of the noise exposure. The amount of threshold 
shift just after exposure is called the initial threshold shift. If the 
threshold shift eventually returns to zero (i.e., the threshold returns 
to the pre-exposure value), it is called temporary threshold shift 
(Southall et al., 2007).
    Pinnipeds have the potential to be disturbed by airborne and 
underwater noise generated by the small boats equipped with outboard 
engines (Richardson, Greene, Malme, and Thomson, 1995). However, there 
is a dearth of information on acoustic effects of motorboats on 
pinniped hearing and communication and to our knowledge there has been 
no specific documentation of hearing impairment in free-ranging 
pinnipeds exposed to small motorboats during realistic field 
conditions.

Behavioral Disturbance

    Disturbances resulting from human activity can impact short- and 
long-term pinniped haul out behavior (Renouf et al., 1981; Schneider 
and Payne, 1983; Terhune and Almon, 1983; Allen et al., 1984; Stewart, 
1984; Suryan and Harvey, 1999; Mortenson et al., 2000; and Kucey and 
Tri.e., 2006). Disturbance includes a variety of effects, including 
subtle to conspicuous changes in behavior, movement, and displacement. 
Reactions to sound, if any, depend on species, state of maturity, 
experience, current activity, reproductive state, time of day, and many 
other factors (Richardson et al., 1995; Wartzok et al., 2004; Southall 
et al., 2007; Weilgart, 2007). If a sound source displaces marine 
mammals from an important feeding or breeding area for a prolonged 
period, impacts on individuals and populations could be significant 
(e.g., Lusseau and Bejder, 2007; Weilgart, 2007).
    Numerous studies have shown that human activity can flush pinnipeds 
off haul-out sites and beaches (Kenyon, 1972; Allen et al., 1984; 
Calambokidis et al., 1991; Suryan and Harvey, 1999; and Mortenson et 
al., 2000). And in one case, human disturbance appeared to cause 
Steller sea lions to desert a breeding area at Northeast Point on St. 
Paul Island, Alaska (Kenyon, 1962).
    In 1997, Henry and Hammil (2001) conducted a study to measure the 
impacts of small boats (i.e., kayaks, canoes, motorboats and sailboats) 
on harbor seal haul-out behavior in M[eacute]tis Bay, Quebec, Canada. 
During that study, the authors noted that the most frequent 
disturbances (n=73) were caused by lower speed, lingering kayaks and 
canoes (33.3 percent) as opposed to motorboats (27.8 percent) 
conducting high speed passes. The seal's flight reactions could be 
linked to a surprise factor by kayaks-canoes which approach slowly, 
quietly and low on water making them look like predators. However, the 
authors note that once the animals were disturbed, there did not appear 
to be any significant lingering effect on the recovery of numbers to 
their pre-disturbance levels. In conclusion, the study showed that boat 
traffic at current levels has only a temporary effect on the haul-out 
behavior of harbor seals in the M[eacute]tis Bay area.
    In 2004, Johnson and Acevedo-Gutierrez (2007) evaluated the 
efficacy of buffer zones for watercraft around harbor seal haul-out 
sites on Yellow Island, Washington state. The authors estimated the 
minimum distance between the vessels and the haul-out sites; 
categorized the vessel types; and evaluated seal responses to the 
disturbances. During the course of the seven-weekend study, the authors 
recorded 14 human-related disturbances which were associated with 
stopped powerboats and kayaks. During these events, hauled out seals 
became noticeably active and moved into the water. The flushing 
occurred when stopped kayaks and powerboats were at distances as far as 
453 and 1,217 ft (138 and 371 m) respectively. The authors note that 
the seals were unaffected by passing powerboats, even those approaching 
as close as 128 ft (39 m), possibly indicating that the animals had 
become tolerant of the brief presence of the vessels and ignored them. 
The authors reported that on average, the seals quickly recovered from 
the

[[Page 15256]]

disturbances and returned to the haul-out site in less than or equal to 
60 minutes. Seal numbers did not return to pre-disturbance levels 
within 180 minutes of the disturbance less than one quarter of the time 
observed. The study concluded that the return of seal numbers to pre-
disturbance levels and the relatively regular seasonal cycle in 
abundance throughout the area counter the idea that disturbances from 
powerboats may result in site abandonment (Johnson and Acevedo-
Gutierrez, 2007).
    As a general statement from the available information, pinnipeds 
exposed to intense (approximately 110 to 120 decibels re: 20 [mu]Pa) 
non-pulse sounds often leave haul-out areas and seek refuge temporarily 
(minutes to a few hours) in the water (Southall et al., 2007). Based on 
the available data, previous monitoring reports from Point Blue, and 
studies described here, we anticipate that any pinnipeds found in the 
vicinity of the proposed project could have short-term behavioral 
reactions to the noise attributed to Point Blue's motorboat operations 
and human presence related to the seabird research activities. We would 
expect the pinnipeds to return to a haul-out site within 60 minutes of 
the disturbance (Allen et al., 1985). The effects to pinnipeds appear 
at the most, to displace the animals temporarily from their haul-out 
sites and we do not expect that the pinnipeds would permanently abandon 
a haul-out site during the conduct of the proposed research. The 
maximum disturbance to Steller sea lions would result in the animals 
slowly flushing into the water in response to presence of the 
researchers.
    No research activities would occur on pinniped rookeries. Breeding 
animals are concentrated in areas where researchers would not visit. 
Therefore, NMFS does not expect mother and pup separation or crushing 
of pups during flushing. In summary, NMFS does not anticipate that the 
proposed activities would result in the injury, serious injury, or 
mortality of pinnipeds because the timing of research visits would 
preclude separation of mothers and pups, as activities occur outside of 
the pupping/breeding areas. The potential effects to marine mammals 
described in this section of the document do not take into 
consideration the proposed monitoring and mitigation measures described 
later in this document (see the ``Proposed Mitigation'' and ``Proposed 
Monitoring and Reporting'' sections).

Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat

    NMFS does not expect the proposed research activities to have any 
habitat-related effects, including to marine mammal prey species, which 
could cause significant or long-term consequences for individual marine 
mammals or their populations. NMFS anticipates that the specified 
activity may result in marine mammals avoiding certain areas due to 
noise generated by: (1) Motorboat approaches and departures; (2) human 
presence during restoration activities and loading operations while 
resupplying the field station; and (3) human presence during seabird 
and pinniped research activities. NMFS considers this impact to habitat 
as temporary and reversible and considered this aspect in more detail 
earlier in this document, as behavioral modification. The main impact 
associated with the proposed activity will be temporarily elevated 
noise levels and the associated direct effects on marine mammals, 
previously discussed in this notice.

Proposed Mitigation

    In order to issue an incidental take authorization under section 
101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, we must set forth the 
permissible methods of taking pursuant to such activity, and other 
means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on such species 
or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, 
mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and the availability 
of such species or stock for taking for certain subsistence uses.
    Point Blue has based the mitigation measures which they will 
implement during the proposed research, on the following: (1) Protocols 
used during previous Point Blue seabird research activities as required 
by our previous authorizations for these activities; and (2) 
recommended best practices in Richardson et al. (1995).
    To reduce the potential for disturbance from acoustic and visual 
stimuli associated with the activities Point Blue and/or its designees 
has proposed to implement the following mitigation measures for marine 
mammals:
    (1) Postpone beach landings on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island until 
pinnipeds that may be present on the beach have slowly entered the 
water.
    (2) Select a pathway of approach to research sites that minimizes 
the number of marine mammals harassed.
    (3) Avoid visits to sites used by pinnipeds for pupping.
    (4) Monitor for offshore predators and do not approach hauled-out 
pinnipeds if great white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) or killer 
whales (Orcinus orca) are present. If Point Blue and/or its designees 
see predators in the area, they must not disturb the animals until the 
area is free of predators.
    (5) Keep voices hushed and bodies low to the ground in the visual 
presence of pinnipeds.
    (6) Conduct seabird observations at North Landing on Southeast 
Farallon Island in an observation blind, shielded from the view of 
hauled-out pinnipeds.
    (7) Crawl slowly to access seabird nest boxes on A[ntilde]o Nuevo 
Island if pinnipeds are within view.
    (8) Coordinate research visits to intertidal areas of Southeast 
Farallon Island (to reduce potential take) and coordinate research 
goals for A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island to minimize the number of trips to 
the island.
    (9) Coordinate monitoring schedules on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, so 
that areas near any pinnipeds would be accessed only once per visit.
    (10) Have the lead biologist serve as an observer to evaluate 
incidental take.

Mitigation Conclusions

    We have carefully evaluated Point Blue's proposed mitigation 
measures in the context of ensuring that we prescribe the means of 
effecting the least practicable impact on the affected marine mammal 
species and stocks and their habitat. Our evaluation of potential 
measures included consideration of the following factors in relation to 
one another:
     The manner in which, and the degree to which, the 
successful implementation of the measure is expected to minimize 
adverse impacts to marine mammals;
     The proven or likely efficacy of the specific measure to 
minimize adverse impacts as planned; and
     The practicability of the measure for applicant 
implementation.
    Any mitigation measure(s) prescribed by us should be able to 
accomplish, have a reasonable likelihood of accomplishing (based on 
current science), or contribute to the accomplishment of one or more of 
the general goals listed here:
    1. Avoidance or minimization of injury or death of marine mammals 
wherever possible (goals 2, 3, and 4 may contribute to this goal).
    2. A reduction in the numbers of marine mammals (total number or 
number at biologically important time or location) exposed to stimuli 
expected to result in incidental take (this goal may contribute to 1, 
above, or to

[[Page 15257]]

reducing takes by behavioral harassment only).
    3. A reduction in the number of times (total number or number at 
biologically important time or location) individuals would be exposed 
to stimuli that we expect to result in the take of marine mammals (this 
goal may contribute to 1, above, or to reducing harassment takes only).
    4. A reduction in the intensity of exposures (either total number 
or number at biologically important time or location) to training 
exercises that we expect to result in the take of marine mammals (this 
goal may contribute to 1, above, or to reducing the severity of 
harassment takes only).
    5. Avoidance or minimization of adverse effects to marine mammal 
habitat, paying special attention to the food base, activities that 
block or limit passage to or from biologically important areas, 
permanent destruction of habitat, or temporary destruction/disturbance 
of habitat during a biologically important time.
    6. For monitoring directly related to mitigation--an increase in 
the probability of detecting marine mammals, thus allowing for more 
effective implementation of the mitigation.
    Based on our evaluation of Point Blue's proposed measures, as well 
as other measures that may be relevant to the specified activity, we 
have preliminarily determined that the mitigation measures provide the 
means of effecting the least practicable impact on marine mammal 
species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to 
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance.

Proposed Monitoring

    In order to issue an incidental take authorization for an activity, 
section 101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act states that we 
must set forth ``requirements pertaining to the monitoring and 
reporting of such taking.'' The Act's implementing regulations at 50 
CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that requests for an incidental take 
authorization must include the suggested means of accomplishing the 
necessary monitoring and reporting that will result in increased 
knowledge of the species and our expectations of the level of taking or 
impacts on populations of marine mammals present in the action area.
    Point Blue submitted a marine mammal monitoring plan in their 
Authorization application. We may modify or supplement the plan based 
on comments or new information received from the public during the 
public comment period. Any monitoring requirement we prescribe should 
improve our understanding of one or more of the following:
     Occurrence of marine mammal species in action area (e.g., 
presence, abundance, distribution, density).
     Nature, scope, or context of likely marine mammal exposure 
to potential stressors/impacts (individual or cumulative, acute or 
chronic), through better understanding of: (1) Action or environment 
(e.g., source characterization, propagation, ambient noise); (2) 
Affected species (e.g., life history, dive patterns); (3) Co-occurrence 
of marine mammal species with the action; or (4) Biological or 
behavioral context of exposure (e.g., age, calving or feeding areas).
     Individual responses to acute stressors, or impacts of 
chronic exposures (behavioral or physiological).
     How anticipated responses to stressors impact either: (1) 
Long-term fitness and survival of an individual; or (2) Population, 
species, or stock.
     Effects on marine mammal habitat and resultant impacts to 
marine mammals.
     Mitigation and monitoring effectiveness.
    As part of its 2016-2017 application, Point Blue proposes to 
sponsor marine mammal monitoring during the present project, in order 
to implement the mitigation measures that require real-time monitoring, 
and to satisfy the monitoring requirements of the incidental harassment 
authorization. The Point Blue researchers will monitor the area for 
pinnipeds during all research activities. Monitoring activities will 
consist of conducting and recording observations on pinnipeds within 
the vicinity of the proposed research areas. The monitoring notes would 
provide dates, location, species, the researcher's activity, behavioral 
state, numbers of animals that were alert or moved greater than one 
meter, and numbers of pinnipeds that flushed into the water.
    Point Blue has complied with the monitoring requirements under the 
previous authorizations for the 2007 through 2016 seasons. The results 
from previous Point Blue's monitoring reports support our findings that 
the proposed mitigation measures, which we also required under the 
2007-2016 Authorizations provide the means of effecting the least 
practicable adverse impact on the species or stock.
    Point Blue has submitted a draft monitoring report on the 2015-2016 
research periods on February 17, 2016. Upon final review, we will post 
this annual report on our Web site at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/research.htm.

Proposed Reporting

    Point Blue must submit a draft final report to NMFS' Office of 
Protected Resources within 60 days after the conclusion of the 2016-
2017 field seasons. The report will include a summary of the 
information gathered pursuant to the monitoring requirements set forth 
in the Authorization.
    Point Blue will submit a final report to the Chief, Permits and 
Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, within 30 days 
after receiving comments from NMFS on the draft final report. If Point 
Blue does not receive any comments from NMFS on the draft report, NMFS 
and Point Blue will consider the draft final report to be the final 
report.

Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment

    Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the 
Marine Mammal Protection Act defines ``harassment'' as: Any act of 
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a 
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; 
or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal 
stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, 
including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, 
feeding, or sheltering [Level B harassment].
    NMFS proposes to authorize take by Level B harassment only for the 
proposed seabird research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, 
A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore. Acoustic 
(i.e., increased sound) and visual stimuli generated during these 
proposed activities may have the potential to cause marine mammals in 
the harbor area to experience temporary, short-term changes in 
behavior.
    Based on Point Blue's previous research experiences, with the same 
activities conducted in the proposed research area, and on marine 
mammal research activities in these areas, we estimate that 
approximately 53,538 California sea lions, 485 harbor seals, 221 
northern elephant seals, five northern fur seals, and 38 Steller sea 
lions could be affected by Level B behavioral harassment over the 
course of the effective period of the proposed Authorization.
    The authorized take differs from Point Blue's original request for 
California sea lions (44,871), harbor seals (343), northern elephant 
seals (196), and

[[Page 15258]]

Steller sea lions (106). NMFS bases these new estimates on historical 
data from previous monitoring reports and anecdotal data for the same 
activities conducted in the proposed research areas. In brief, for four 
species (i.e., California sea lions, harbor seals, northern elephant 
seals, and Steller sea lions), we created a statistical model to derive 
an estimate of the average annual increase of reported take based on a 
best fit regression analysis (i.e., linear or polynomial regression) of 
reported take from 2007 to 2016. Next, we added the predicted annual 
increase in take for each species to the baseline reported take for the 
2015-2016 seasons to project the estimated take for each species for 
the 2016-2017 proposed Authorization. We carried through the same 
predicted annual increase in take for future Authorizations (2017-2019) 
to obtain a mean projected take for each species. Last, we analyzed the 
reported take for each activity by calculating the upper bound of the 
95 percent confidence interval of the mean reported take (2007-2016) 
and mean projected take (2017-2019) for each species. Our use of the 
upper confidence interval represents the best available information 
that supports our precautionary deliberation of how much take could 
occur annually.
    Although Point Blue has not reported encountering northern fur 
seals during the course of their previously authorized activities, NMFS 
has included take (5) for northern fur seals based on recent stranding 
information in the area for that species.
    There is no evidence that Point Blue's planned activities could 
result in injury, serious injury, or mortality within the action area. 
Moreover, the required mitigation and monitoring measures will minimize 
further any potential risk for injury, serious injury, or mortality. 
Thus, we do not propose to authorize any injury, serious injury or 
mortality. We expect all potential takes to fall under the category of 
Level B harassment only.

Encouraging and Coordinating Research

    Point Blue will continue to coordinate monitoring of pinnipeds 
during the research activities occurring on Southeast Farallon Island, 
A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore. Point Blue 
conducts bone fide research on marine mammals, the results of which may 
contribute to the basic knowledge of marine mammal biology or ecology, 
or are likely to identify, evaluate, or resolve conservation problems.

Negligible Impact Analysis and Preliminary Determinations

    NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as `` . . 
. an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be 
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely 
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of 
recruitment or survival.'' A negligible impact finding is based on the 
lack of likely adverse effects on annual rates of recruitment or 
survival (i.e., population-level effects). An estimate of the number of 
Level B harassment takes alone is not enough information on which to 
base an impact determination. In addition to considering estimates of 
the number of marine mammals that might be ``taken'' through behavioral 
harassment, we consider other factors, such as the likely nature of any 
responses (e.g., intensity, duration), the context of any responses 
(e.g., critical reproductive time or location, migration), as well as 
the number and nature of estimated Level A harassment takes, the number 
of estimated mortalities, and effects on habitat.
    To avoid repetition, the discussion below applies to all five 
species discussed earlier in this notice. In making a negligible impact 
determination, we consider:
     The number of anticipated injuries, serious injuries, or 
mortalities;
     The number, nature, and intensity, and duration of Level B 
harassment;
     The context in which the takes occur (e.g., impacts to 
areas of significance, impacts to local populations, and cumulative 
impacts when taking into account successive/contemporaneous actions 
when added to baseline data);
     The status of stock or species of marine mammals (i.e., 
depleted, not depleted, decreasing, increasing, stable, impact relative 
to the size of the population);
     Impacts on habitat affecting rates of recruitment/
survival; and
     The effectiveness of monitoring and mitigation measures to 
reduce the number or severity of incidental take.
    For reasons stated previously in this document and based on the 
following factors, NMFS does not expect Point Blue's specified 
activities to cause long-term behavioral disturbance, abandonment of 
the haul-out area, injury, serious injury, or mortality:
    (1) The takes from Level B harassment would be due to potential 
behavioral disturbance. The effects of the seabird research activities 
would be limited to short-term startle responses and localized 
behavioral changes due to the short and sporadic duration of the 
research activities. Minor and brief responses, such as short-duration 
startle or alert reactions, are not likely to constitute disruption of 
behavioral patterns, such as migration, nursing, breeding, feeding, or 
sheltering.
    (2) The availability of alternate areas for pinnipeds to avoid the 
resultant acoustic and visual disturbances from the research 
operations. Results from previous monitoring reports also show that the 
pinnipeds returned to the various sites and did not permanently abandon 
haul-out sites after Point Blue conducted their pinniped and research 
activities.
    (3) There is no potential for large-scale movements leading to 
injury, serious injury, or mortality because the researchers must delay 
ingress into the landing areas until after the pinnipeds present have 
slowly entered the water.
    (4) The limited access of Point Blue's researchers to Southeast 
Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National 
Seashore during the pupping season.
    We do not anticipate that any injuries, serious injuries, or 
mortalities would occur as a result of Point Blue's proposed 
activities, and we do not propose to authorize injury, serious injury 
or mortality. These species may exhibit behavioral modifications, 
including temporarily vacating the area during the proposed seabird and 
pinniped research activities to avoid the resultant acoustic and visual 
disturbances. Further, these proposed activities would not take place 
in areas of significance for marine mammal feeding, resting, breeding, 
or calving and would not adversely impact marine mammal habitat. Due to 
the nature, degree, and context of the behavioral harassment 
anticipated, the activities are not expected to impact annual rates of 
recruitment or survival.
    NMFS does not expect pinnipeds to permanently abandon any area that 
is surveyed by researchers, as is evidenced by continued presence of 
pinnipeds at the sites during annual monitoring counts. Based on the 
analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the specified 
activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into 
consideration the implementation of the proposed mitigation and 
monitoring measures, NMFS preliminarily finds that the total marine 
mammal take from Point Blue's seabird research activities will not 
adversely affect annual rates of recruitment or survival and therefore 
will have a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks.

[[Page 15259]]

Small Numbers

    As mentioned previously, NMFS estimates that four species of marine 
mammals could be potentially affected by Level B harassment over the 
course of the proposed Authorization. For each species, these numbers 
are small relative to the population size. These incidental harassment 
numbers represent approximately 18.04 percent of the U.S. stock of 
California sea lion, 1.61 percent of the California stock of Pacific 
harbor seal, 0.12 percent of the California breeding stock of northern 
elephant seal, 0.04 percent of the California stock of northern fur 
seals, and 0.06 percent of the eastern distinct population segment of 
Steller sea lion.
    Because these are maximum estimates, actual take numbers are likely 
to be lower, as some animals may select other haul-out sites the day 
the researchers are present.

Impact on Availability of Affected Species or Stock for Taking for 
Subsistence Uses

    Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA also requires us to determine that 
the taking will not have an unmitigable adverse effect on the 
availability of marine mammal species or stocks for subsistence use. 
There are no relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals implicated by 
this action. Thus, NMFS has determined that the total taking of 
affected species or stocks would not have an unmitigable adverse impact 
on the availability of such species or stocks for taking for 
subsistence purposes.

Endangered Species Act

    No marine mammal species listed under the ESA are anticipated to 
occur in the action area. Therefore, NMFS has determined that a section 
7 consultation under the ESA is not required.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

    We have prepared a draft Environmental Assessment (EA) analyzing 
the potential effects to the human environment from our proposed 
issuance of an Authorization to Point Blue for their seabird research 
activities. The draft EA titled, Proposed Issuance of an Incidental 
Harassment Authorization to Point Blue Conservation Science and 
Partners to Take Marine Mammals by Harassment Incidental to Seabird 
Research Conducted in Central California is posted on our Web site at 
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/research.htm. Information in 
Point Blue's application, NMFS' DEA and this notice collectively 
provide the environmental information related to proposed issuance of 
an Authorization for public review and comment. NMFS will review all 
comments submitted in response to this notice as we complete the NEPA 
process, including a decision of whether to sign a Finding of No 
Significant Impact (FONSI), prior to a final decision on the proposed 
Authorization request.

Proposed Authorization

    As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to 
authorize the take of marine mammals incidental to Point Blue's seabird 
research activities, provided the previously mentioned mitigation, 
monitoring, and reporting requirements are incorporated. The next 
section provides the proposed IHA language and contains a draft of the 
Authorization. The wording within this section is proposed for 
inclusion in the Authorization (if issued).
    1. This Authorization is valid from May 2016 through April 2017.
    2. This Authorization is valid only for specified activities 
associated with seabird research activities in the vicinity of pinniped 
haul-out sites located on Southeast Farallon Island (37[deg]41'54.32'' 
N., 123[deg]0'8.33'' W.), A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island (37[deg]6'29.25'' N., 
122[deg]20'12.20'' W.), within Point Reyes National Seashore 
(37[deg]59'38.61'' N., 122[deg]58'24.90'' W.), San Francisco Bay, or 
the Russian River in Sonoma County.

3. Species Authorized and Level of Takes

    a. The taking, by Level B harassment only, is limited to the 
following species: 53,538 California sea lions (Zalophus 
californianus), 485 Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), 221 northern 
elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), five northern fur seals, and 
38 Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus).
    b. The taking by injury (Level A harassment), serious injury or 
death of any of the species listed in Condition 3(a) or the taking of 
any kind of any other species of marine mammal is prohibited and may 
result in the modification, suspension or revocation of this 
Authorization.
    c. The taking of any marine mammal in a manner prohibited under 
this Authorization must be reported immediately to the West Coast 
Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and to 
the Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS.

4. General Conditions

    a. A copy of this Authorization must be in the possession of Point 
Blue, its designees, and field crew personnel (including research 
collaborators from Point Reyes National Seashore and Oikonos--Ecosystem 
Knowledge) operating under the authority of this Authorization.
    b. The holder must notify the Assistant Regional Administrator for 
Protected Resources, West Coast Region at least 24 hours prior to 
starting seabird research activities (unless constrained by the date of 
issuance of this Authorization).

5. Mitigation Measures

    In order to ensure the least practicable impact on the species 
listed in condition 3(a), the holder of this Authorization is required 
to:
    a. Minimize the potential for disturbance (to the lowest level 
practicable near known pinniped haul-outs by boat travel and pedestrian 
approach during seabird research operations). Point Blue and its 
designees must:
     Postpone beach landings until pinnipeds that may be 
present in the access areas have entered the water.
     Select a pathway of approach to research sites that 
minimizes the number of marine mammals harassed.
     Avoid visits to sites used by pinnipeds for pupping.
     Monitor for offshore predators and not approach hauled-out 
pinnipeds if great white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) or killer 
whales (Orcinus orca) are in the area. If Point Blue and/or its 
designees see predators in the area, they must not disturb the animals 
until the area is free of predators.
     Keep voices hushed and bodies low to the ground in the 
visual presence of pinnipeds.
     Conduct seabird observations at North Landing on Southeast 
Farallon Island in an observation blind, shielded from the view of 
hauled-out pinnipeds.
     Crawl slowly to access seabird nest boxes on A[ntilde]o 
Nuevo Island if pinnipeds are within view.
     Coordinate research visits to intertidal areas of 
Southeast Farallon Island (to reduce potential take) and coordinate 
research goals for A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island to minimize the number of 
trips to the island.
     Coordinate monitoring schedules on A[ntilde]o Nuevo 
Island, so that areas near any pinnipeds would be accessed only once 
per visit.
     Have the lead biologist serve as an observer to evaluate 
incidental take.

6. Monitoring

    The holder of this Authorization is required to:

[[Page 15260]]

    a. Record the date, time, and location (or closest point of 
ingress) of each visit to the research site.
    b. Collect the following information for each visit: Composition of 
the marine mammals sighted, such as species, gender and life history.

7. Reporting

    The holder of this Authorization is required to:
    a. Report observations of unusual behaviors of pinnipeds to West 
Coast Region fishery biologist so that the appropriate personnel in the 
Regional Office may conduct any potential follow-up observations.
    b. Draft Report: Submit a draft final report to the Chief, Permits 
and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, Headquarters, 
NMFS within 60 days after the expiration of the Authorization. The 
report will include the information gathered pursuant to the monitoring 
requirements listed in item 6, along with an executive summary.
    c. The Draft Report shall be subject to review and comment by NMFS. 
Any recommendations made by NMFS must be addressed in the Final Report 
prior to submission to NMFS. If we decide that the draft final report 
needs no comments, the draft final report will be considered to be the 
final report.
    d. Final Report: Submit a final report to the Chief, Permits and 
Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, Headquarters, 
NMFS within 30 days after receiving comments from us on the draft final 
report.

8. Reporting Prohibited Take

    In the unanticipated event that Point Blue's activities cause any 
taking of a marine mammal in a manner prohibited by the Authorization, 
such as an injury (Level A harassment), serious injury or mortality 
(e.g., vessel-strike), Point Blue shall immediately cease the specified 
activities and immediately report the incident to the Chief, Permits 
and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, and the 
Assistant West Coast Regional Stranding Coordinator. The report must 
include the following information:
    Time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the incident; the 
name and type of vessel involved; the vessel's speed during and leading 
up to the incident; description of the incident; water depth; 
environmental conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction, Beaufort sea 
state, cloud cover, and visibility); description of marine mammal 
observations in the 24 hours preceding the incident; species 
identification or description of the animal(s) involved; the fate of 
the animal(s); and photographs or video footage of the animal (if 
equipment is available).
    Point Blue shall not resume its activities until NMFS is able to 
review the circumstances of the prohibited take. NMFS will work with 
Point Blue to determine what is necessary to minimize the likelihood of 
further prohibited take and ensure MMPA compliance. Point Blue may not 
resume their activities until notified by NMFS in writing via a letter 
or email or via the telephone.

9. Reporting an Injured or Dead Marine Mammal With an Unknown Cause of 
Death

    In the event that Point Blue discovers an injured or dead marine 
mammal, and the lead researcher determines that the cause of the injury 
or death is unknown and the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less 
than a moderate state of decomposition as described in the next 
paragraph), Point Blue will immediately report the incident to the 
Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources 
and the Assistant West Coast Regional Stranding Coordinator. The report 
must include the same information identified in the paragraph above 
this section. Activities may continue while we review the circumstances 
of the incident. NMFS will work with Point Blue to determine whether 
modifications to the activities are appropriate.

10. Reporting an Injured or Dead Marine Mammal Not Related to Point 
Blue's Activities

    In the event that Point Blue discovers an injured or dead marine 
mammal, and the lead researcher determines that the injury or death is 
not associated with or related to the activities authorized in the 
Authorization (e.g., previously wounded animal, carcass with moderate 
to advanced decomposition, or scavenger damage), Point Blue will report 
the incident to the Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of 
Protected Resources and the Assistant West Coast Regional Stranding 
Coordinator within 24 hours of the discovery. Point Blue will provide 
photographs or video footage (if available) or other documentation of 
the stranded animal sighting to us and the Marine Mammal Stranding 
Network. Point Blue can continue their research activities.
    11. A copy of this Authorization must be in the possession of Point 
Blue and its designees (including contractors and marine mammal 
monitors) operating under the authority of this Incidental Harassment 
Authorization at all times.

Request for Public Comments

    NMFS requests comment on the analyses, the draft Authorization, and 
any other aspect of the Notice of Proposed Incidental Harassment 
Authorization for Point Blue's seabird research activities. Please 
include any supporting data or literature citations with your comments 
to help inform our final decision on Point Blue's request for an 
Authorization.

    Dated: March 16, 2016.
Perry F. Gayaldo,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-06317 Filed 3-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices 15249

challenges, and successful approaches DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE research.htm without change. All
for the effective implementation of the Personal Identifying Information (for
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery National Oceanic and Atmospheric example, name, address, etc.)
Conservation and Management Act Administration voluntarily submitted by the commenter
Essential Fish Habitat authorities. may be publicly accessible. Do not
RIN 0648–XE468
Registration is required, and submit confidential business
participation may be limited. See Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to information or otherwise sensitive or
http://www.fisheriesforum.org/our- Specified Activities; Seabird Research protected information.
Activities in Central California, 2016– To obtain an electronic copy of the
work/special-projects/efh-summit for
2017 2016 renewal request, the 2015
more information and to register.
application, our draft Environmental
DATES:The meeting will begin Tuesday, AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Assessment (EA), or a list of the
May 17, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. and will end Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and references, write to the previously
on Thursday, May 19, 2016, at 3 p.m. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), mentioned address, telephone the
Commerce. contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at INFORMATION CONTACT), or visit the
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
the Westin Annapolis, 100 Westgate Internet at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
harassment authorization; request for
Circle, Annapolis, MD 21401, pr/permits/incidental/research.htm.
comments.
telephone: 410–972–4300. Information in Point Blue’s
SUMMARY: NMFS (hereinafter, ‘‘we’’ or application, our draft EA and this notice
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
‘‘our’’) received an application from collectively provide the environmental
Terra Lederhouse at (301) 427–8639 or
Point Blue Conservation Science (Point information related to the proposed
terra.lederhouse@noaa.gov. issuance of the Authorization for public
Blue) requesting an Incidental
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Harassment Authorization review and comment.
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Summit is (Authorization) to take marine FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robt
a collaborative effort between the mammals, by harassment, incidental to Pauline, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service, the conducting proposed seabird research NMFS (301) 427–8401.
Regional Fishery Management Councils, activities on Southeast Farallon Island, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and the Fisheries Leadership and Año Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes
Background
Sustainability Forum. The final agenda National Seashore in central California
will be responsive to the interests, from May 2016 through May 2017. Per Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
questions, and areas of expertise among the Marine Mammal Protection Act, we Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
request comments on our proposal to as amended (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et
participating National Marine Fisheries
issue an Authorization to Point Blue to seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce
Service and Regional Fishery
incidentally take, by Level B harassment to allow, upon request, the incidental,
Management Council representatives, but not intentional, taking of small
and may include discussions on EFH only, five species [i.e., California sea
lion (Zalophus californianus), Pacific numbers of marine mammals of a
conservation roles, responsibilities, and species or population stock, by U.S.
harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), northern
process, the use of habitat science for citizens who engage in a specified
elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris),
management decisions, EFH and the activity (other than commercial fishing)
northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus),
changing marine environment, and the and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias within a specified geographical region
future of EFH conservation. A copy of jubatus)] of marine mammals during the if, after NMFS provides a notice of a
the final agenda will be available at specified activity. proposed authorization to the public for
http://www.fisheriesforum.org/our- review and comment: (1) NMFS makes
DATES: NMFS must receive comments
work/special-projects/efh-summit. certain findings; and (2) the taking is
and information no later than April 21,
limited to harassment.
Special Accommodations 2016. An Authorization for incidental
ADDRESSES: Address comments on the takings for marine mammals shall be
The meeting location is physically application to Jolie Harrison, Chief, granted if NMFS finds that the taking
accessible to people with disabilities. Permits and Conservation Division, will have a negligible impact on the
Requests for sign language Office of Protected Resources, National species or stock(s), will not have an
interpretation or other auxiliary aids Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East- unmitigable adverse impact on the
should be directed to Terra Lederhouse West Highway, Silver Spring, MD availability of the species or stock(s) for
at (301) 427–8639 at least 5 days prior 20910. The mailbox address for subsistence uses (where relevant), and if
to the meeting date. providing email comments is the permissible methods of taking and
Dated: March 17, 2016. ITP.Pauline@noaa.gov. You must requirements pertaining to the
Carrie Selberg,
include 0648–XE468 in the subject line. mitigation, monitoring, and reporting of
We are not responsible for email such taking are set forth. NMFS has
Deputy Director, Office of Habitat comments sent to addresses other than
Conservation, National Marine Fisheries defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
the one provided here. Comments sent 216.103 as ‘‘an impact resulting from
Service.
via email, including all attachments,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

[FR Doc. 2016–06414 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am]
the specified activity that cannot be
must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size. reasonably expected to, and is not
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P NMFS is not responsible for email reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
comments sent to addresses other than species or stock through effects on
the one provided here. annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Instructions: All submitted comments
are a part of the public record and Summary of Request
NMFS will post them to http://www. On September 29, 2015, NMFS
nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/ received an application from Point Blue

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
$Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices 15251 year. A majority of the research occurs 122°20′12.20″ W.), or within Point Año Nuevo Island in areas where marine mammals are not Reyes National Seashore (37°59′38.61″ Año Nuevo Island located at present. However, the potential for N.; 122°58′24.90″ W.) in central 37°6′29.25″ N.; 122°20′12.20″ W. is one- incidental harassment will occur at the California. The proposed action area landing beaches along Point Reyes quarter mile (402 m) offshore of Año consists of the following three locations Nuevo Point in San Mateo County, CA. Headland, boat ramps, or parking lots in the northeast Pacific Ocean: where northern elephant seals, harbor This small 25-acre (0.1 square km) seals, or California sea lions may be South Farallones Islands island is part of the Año Nuevo State hauled out in the vicinity. Reserve, all of which is owned and The South Farallon Islands consist of operated by California State Parks. The Dates and Duration Southeast Farallon Island located at Island lies within the Monterey Bay Point Blue proposes to conduct the 37°41′54.32″ N.; 123°0′8.33″ W. and National Marine Sanctuary and the Año seabird research activities over the West End Island. These two islands are Nuevo State Marine Conservation Area. course of one year. The proposed directly adjacent to each other and separated by only a 30-foot (ft) (9.1 Point Reyes National Seashore Authorization, if issued, would be effective from May 1, 2016, through meter (m)) channel. The South Farallon Point Reyes National Seashore located April 30, 2017. Islands have a land area of is approximately 40 miles (64.3 km) approximately 120 acres (0.49 square north of San Francisco Bay and also lies Description of the Specified Geographic kilometers (km)) and are part of the within the Gulf of the Farallones Region Farallon National Wildlife Refuge. The National Marine Sanctuary. The The proposed activities would occur islands are located near the edge of the proposed research areas (Life Boat in the vicinity of pinniped haul-out sites continental shelf 28 miles (mi) (45.1 km) Station, Drakes Beach, and Point Bonita) located on Southeast Farallon Island west of San Francisco, CA, and lie are within the headland coastal areas of (37°41′54.32″ N.; 123°0′8.33″ W.), Año within the waters of the Gulf of the the National Park. Nuevo Island (37°6′29.25″ N.; Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. BILLING CODE 3510–22–P asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1$
15254 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices

California sea lions at Point Reyes the perimeter of the island (see Figure the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands,
National Seashore haul out at only a few 2 in Point Blue’s Application) and the respectively. The species is not known
locations, but will occur on human island’s average population ranges from to migrate, but individuals disperse
structures such as boat ramps. The 100 to 150 animals (M. Lowry, widely outside of the breeding season
annual population averages around 300 unpublished data). (late May through early July), thus
to 500 during the fall through spring potentially intermixing with animals
Northern Fur Seal
months, although on occasion, several from other areas.
thousand sea lions can arrive depending Northern fur seals occur from The eastern distinct population
upon local prey resources (S. Allen, southern California north to the Bering segment of Steller sea lions breeds on
unpublished data). On Año Nuevo Sea and west to the Sea of Okhotsk and rookeries located in southeast Alaska,
Island, California sea lions may haul out Honshu Island of Japan. NMFS British Columbia, Oregon, and
at one of eight beach areas on the recognizes two separate stocks of California. There are no rookeries
perimeter of the island (see Point Blue’s northern fur seals within U.S. waters: located in Washington. Steller sea lions
Application). The island’s average An Eastern Pacific stock distributed give birth in May through July and
population ranges from 4,000 to 9,500 among sites in Alaska, British Columbia; breeding commences a couple of weeks
animals (M. Lowry, unpublished data). and a California stock distributed along after birth. Pups are weaned during the
the west coast of the continental U.S. winter and spring of the following year.
Pacific Harbor Seal The estimated population of the Despite the wide-ranging movements
Pacific harbor seals are not listed as California stock is 14,050 animals with of juveniles and adult males in
threatened or endangered under the a maximum population growth rate of particular, exchange between rookeries
Endangered Species Act, nor are they 12 percent (Carretta et al., 2015). by breeding adult females and males
categorized as depleted under the Northern fur seals may temporarily (other than between adjoining rookeries)
MMPA. The estimated population of the haul out on land at other sites in Alaska, appears low, although males have a
California stock of harbor seals is 30,196 British Columbia, and on islets along higher tendency to disperse than
animals (Carretta et al., 2015). the west coast of the continental United females (NMFS, 1995; Trujillo et al.,
The animals inhabit near-shore States, but generally this occurs outside 2004; Hoffman et al., 2006). A
coastal and estuarine areas from Baja of the breeding season (Fiscus, 1983). northward shift in the overall breeding
California, Mexico, to the Pribilof Northern fur seals breed in Alaska distribution has occurred, with a
Islands in Alaska. Pacific harbor seals and migrate along the west coast during contraction of the range in southern
are divided into two subspecies: P. v. fall and winter. Due to their pelagic California and new rookeries
stejnegeri in the western North Pacific, habitat, they are rarely seen from shore established in southeastern Alaska
near Japan, and P. v. richardsi in the in the continental U.S., but individuals (Pitcher et al., 2007).
northeast Pacific Ocean. The latter occasionally come ashore on islands The current population of Steller sea
subspecies, recognized as three separate well offshore (i.e., Farallon Islands and lions in the proposed research area is
stocks, inhabits the west coast of the Channel Islands in California). During estimated to number between 50 and
continental United States, including: the breeding season, approximately 74 750 animals. Overall, counts of non-
The outer coastal waters of Oregon and percent of the worldwide population pups at trend sites in California and
Washington states; Washington state inhabits the Pribilof Islands in Alaska, Oregon have been relatively stable or
inland waters; and Alaska coastal and with the remaining animals spread increasing slowly since the 1980s (Muto
inland waters. throughout the North Pacific Ocean and Angliss, 2015).
In California, over 500 harbor seal (Lander and Kajimura, 1982). Point Blue estimates that between 50
haul-out sites are widely distributed and 150 Steller sea lions live on the
along the mainland and offshore Steller Sea Lion Farallon Islands. On Southeast Farallon
islands, and include rocky shores, Steller sea lions consist of two Island, the abundance of females
beaches and intertidal sandbars (Lowry distinct population segments: The declined an average of 3.6 percent per
et al., 2005). Harbor seals mate at sea western and eastern distinct population year from 1974 to 1997 (Sydeman and
and females give birth during the spring segments (DPS) divided at 144 °West Allen, 1999).
and summer, although, the pupping longitude (Cape Suckling, Alaska). The The National Marine Fisheries
season varies with latitude. Pups are western segment of Steller sea lions Service’s Southwest Fisheries Science
nursed for an average of 24 days and are inhabit central and western Gulf of Center estimates between 400 and 600
ready to swim minutes after being born. Alaska, Aleutian Islands, as well as live on Año Nuevo Island (Point Blue
Harbor seal pupping takes place at many coastal waters and breed in Asia (e.g., unpublished data, 2008; Southwest
locations and rookery size varies from a Japan and Russia). The eastern segment Fisheries Science Center unpublished
few pups to many hundreds of pups. includes sea lions living in southeast data, 2008). At Año Nuevo Island off
In California, over 500 harbor seal Alaska, British Columbia, California, central California, a steady decline in
haul-out sites are widely distributed and Oregon. The eastern DPS includes ground counts started around 1970, and
along the mainland and offshore animals born east of Cape Suckling, AK there was an 85 percent reduction in the
islands, and include rocky shores, (144 °W.) and the latest abundance breeding population by 1987 (LeBoeuf
beaches and intertidal sandbars (Lowry estimate for the stock is 60,131 to 74,448 et al., 1991). Pup counts at Año Nuevo
et al., 2005). On the Farallon Islands, animals (Muto and Angliss, 2015). The Island declined five percent annually
approximately 40 to 120 Pacific harbor eastern DPS of Steller sea lion is not through the 1990s (NOAA Stock
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

seals haul out in the intertidal areas listed as threatened or endangered Assessment, 2003), and have apparently
(Point Blue unpublished data). Harbor under the Endangered Species Act, but stabilized between 2001 and 2005 (M.
seals at Point Reyes National Seashore is categorized as depleted under the Lowry, SWFSC unpublished data). In
haul out at nine locations with an MMPA. 2000, the combined pup estimate for
annual population of up to 4,000 Steller sea lions range along the North both islands was 349. In 2005, the pup
animals (M. Lowry, unpublished data). Pacific Rim from northern Japan to estimate was 204 on the Island. Pup
On Año Nuevo Island, harbor seals may California (Loughlin et al., 1984), with counts on the Farallon Islands have
haul out at one of eight beach areas on centers of abundance and distribution in generally varied from five to 15

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices 15257

reducing takes by behavioral harassment comment period. Any monitoring http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
only). requirement we prescribe should incidental/research.htm.
3. A reduction in the number of times improve our understanding of one or
(total number or number at biologically Proposed Reporting
more of the following:
important time or location) individuals • Occurrence of marine mammal Point Blue must submit a draft final
would be exposed to stimuli that we species in action area (e.g., presence, report to NMFS’ Office of Protected
expect to result in the take of marine abundance, distribution, density). Resources within 60 days after the
mammals (this goal may contribute to 1, • Nature, scope, or context of likely conclusion of the 2016–2017 field
above, or to reducing harassment takes marine mammal exposure to potential seasons. The report will include a
only). stressors/impacts (individual or summary of the information gathered
4. A reduction in the intensity of cumulative, acute or chronic), through pursuant to the monitoring
exposures (either total number or better understanding of: (1) Action or requirements set forth in the
number at biologically important time environment (e.g., source Authorization.
or location) to training exercises that we characterization, propagation, ambient Point Blue will submit a final report
expect to result in the take of marine noise); (2) Affected species (e.g., life to the Chief, Permits and Conservation
mammals (this goal may contribute to 1, history, dive patterns); (3) Co- Division, Office of Protected Resources,
above, or to reducing the severity of occurrence of marine mammal species within 30 days after receiving comments
harassment takes only). with the action; or (4) Biological or from NMFS on the draft final report. If
5. Avoidance or minimization of behavioral context of exposure (e.g., age, Point Blue does not receive any
adverse effects to marine mammal calving or feeding areas). comments from NMFS on the draft
habitat, paying special attention to the • Individual responses to acute report, NMFS and Point Blue will
food base, activities that block or limit stressors, or impacts of chronic consider the draft final report to be the
passage to or from biologically exposures (behavioral or physiological). final report.
important areas, permanent destruction
• How anticipated responses to Estimated Take by Incidental
of habitat, or temporary destruction/
stressors impact either: (1) Long-term Harassment
disturbance of habitat during a
fitness and survival of an individual; or Except with respect to certain
biologically important time.
(2) Population, species, or stock. activities not pertinent here, the Marine
6. For monitoring directly related to
mitigation—an increase in the • Effects on marine mammal habitat Mammal Protection Act defines
probability of detecting marine and resultant impacts to marine ‘‘harassment’’ as: Any act of pursuit,
mammals, thus allowing for more mammals. torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
effective implementation of the • Mitigation and monitoring potential to injure a marine mammal or
mitigation. effectiveness. marine mammal stock in the wild [Level
Based on our evaluation of Point As part of its 2016–2017 application, A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
Blue’s proposed measures, as well as Point Blue proposes to sponsor marine to disturb a marine mammal or marine
other measures that may be relevant to mammal monitoring during the present mammal stock in the wild by causing
the specified activity, we have project, in order to implement the disruption of behavioral patterns,
preliminarily determined that the mitigation measures that require real- including, but not limited to, migration,
mitigation measures provide the means time monitoring, and to satisfy the breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
of effecting the least practicable impact monitoring requirements of the sheltering [Level B harassment].
on marine mammal species or stocks incidental harassment authorization. NMFS proposes to authorize take by
and their habitat, paying particular The Point Blue researchers will monitor Level B harassment only for the
attention to rookeries, mating grounds, the area for pinnipeds during all proposed seabird research activities on
and areas of similar significance. research activities. Monitoring activities Southeast Farallon Island, Año Nuevo
will consist of conducting and recording Island, and Point Reyes National
Proposed Monitoring observations on pinnipeds within the Seashore. Acoustic (i.e., increased
In order to issue an incidental take vicinity of the proposed research areas. sound) and visual stimuli generated
authorization for an activity, section The monitoring notes would provide during these proposed activities may
101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal dates, location, species, the researcher’s have the potential to cause marine
Protection Act states that we must set activity, behavioral state, numbers of mammals in the harbor area to
forth ‘‘requirements pertaining to the animals that were alert or moved greater experience temporary, short-term
monitoring and reporting of such than one meter, and numbers of changes in behavior.
taking.’’ The Act’s implementing pinnipeds that flushed into the water. Based on Point Blue’s previous
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) Point Blue has complied with the research experiences, with the same
indicate that requests for an incidental monitoring requirements under the activities conducted in the proposed
take authorization must include the previous authorizations for the 2007 research area, and on marine mammal
suggested means of accomplishing the through 2016 seasons. The results from research activities in these areas, we
necessary monitoring and reporting that previous Point Blue’s monitoring estimate that approximately 53,538
will result in increased knowledge of reports support our findings that the California sea lions, 485 harbor seals,
the species and our expectations of the proposed mitigation measures, which 221 northern elephant seals, five
level of taking or impacts on we also required under the 2007–2016 northern fur seals, and 38 Steller sea
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

populations of marine mammals present Authorizations provide the means of lions could be affected by Level B
in the action area. effecting the least practicable adverse behavioral harassment over the course
Point Blue submitted a marine impact on the species or stock. of the effective period of the proposed
mammal monitoring plan in their Point Blue has submitted a draft Authorization.
Authorization application. We may monitoring report on the 2015–2016 The authorized take differs from Point
modify or supplement the plan based on research periods on February 17, 2016. Blue’s original request for California sea
comments or new information received Upon final review, we will post this lions (44,871), harbor seals (343),
from the public during the public annual report on our Web site at northern elephant seals (196), and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
15258 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices

Steller sea lions (106). NMFS bases Negligible Impact Analysis and short and sporadic duration of the
these new estimates on historical data Preliminary Determinations research activities. Minor and brief
from previous monitoring reports and NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible responses, such as short-duration startle
anecdotal data for the same activities impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘ . . . an or alert reactions, are not likely to
conducted in the proposed research impact resulting from the specified constitute disruption of behavioral
areas. In brief, for four species (i.e., activity that cannot be reasonably patterns, such as migration, nursing,
California sea lions, harbor seals, expected to, and is not reasonably likely breeding, feeding, or sheltering.
northern elephant seals, and Steller sea to, adversely affect the species or stock (2) The availability of alternate areas
lions), we created a statistical model to through effects on annual rates of for pinnipeds to avoid the resultant
derive an estimate of the average annual recruitment or survival.’’ A negligible acoustic and visual disturbances from
increase of reported take based on a best impact finding is based on the lack of the research operations. Results from
fit regression analysis (i.e., linear or likely adverse effects on annual rates of previous monitoring reports also show
polynomial regression) of reported take recruitment or survival (i.e., population- that the pinnipeds returned to the
from 2007 to 2016. Next, we added the level effects). An estimate of the number various sites and did not permanently
predicted annual increase in take for of Level B harassment takes alone is not abandon haul-out sites after Point Blue
each species to the baseline reported enough information on which to base an conducted their pinniped and research
take for the 2015–2016 seasons to impact determination. In addition to activities.
project the estimated take for each considering estimates of the number of (3) There is no potential for large-
species for the 2016–2017 proposed marine mammals that might be ‘‘taken’’ scale movements leading to injury,
Authorization. We carried through the through behavioral harassment, we serious injury, or mortality because the
same predicted annual increase in take consider other factors, such as the likely researchers must delay ingress into the
for future Authorizations (2017–2019) to nature of any responses (e.g., intensity, landing areas until after the pinnipeds
obtain a mean projected take for each duration), the context of any responses present have slowly entered the water.
species. Last, we analyzed the reported (e.g., critical reproductive time or
take for each activity by calculating the (4) The limited access of Point Blue’s
location, migration), as well as the researchers to Southeast Farallon Island,
upper bound of the 95 percent number and nature of estimated Level A
confidence interval of the mean Año Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes
harassment takes, the number of National Seashore during the pupping
reported take (2007–2016) and mean estimated mortalities, and effects on
projected take (2017–2019) for each season.
habitat.
species. Our use of the upper To avoid repetition, the discussion We do not anticipate that any injuries,
confidence interval represents the best below applies to all five species serious injuries, or mortalities would
available information that supports our discussed earlier in this notice. In occur as a result of Point Blue’s
precautionary deliberation of how much making a negligible impact proposed activities, and we do not
take could occur annually. determination, we consider: propose to authorize injury, serious
Although Point Blue has not reported • The number of anticipated injuries, injury or mortality. These species may
encountering northern fur seals during serious injuries, or mortalities; exhibit behavioral modifications,
the course of their previously • The number, nature, and intensity, including temporarily vacating the area
authorized activities, NMFS has and duration of Level B harassment; during the proposed seabird and
included take (5) for northern fur seals • The context in which the takes pinniped research activities to avoid the
based on recent stranding information occur (e.g., impacts to areas of resultant acoustic and visual
in the area for that species. significance, impacts to local disturbances. Further, these proposed
There is no evidence that Point Blue’s populations, and cumulative impacts activities would not take place in areas
planned activities could result in injury, when taking into account successive/ of significance for marine mammal
serious injury, or mortality within the contemporaneous actions when added feeding, resting, breeding, or calving
action area. Moreover, the required to baseline data); and would not adversely impact marine
mitigation and monitoring measures • The status of stock or species of mammal habitat. Due to the nature,
will minimize further any potential risk marine mammals (i.e., depleted, not degree, and context of the behavioral
for injury, serious injury, or mortality. depleted, decreasing, increasing, stable, harassment anticipated, the activities
Thus, we do not propose to authorize impact relative to the size of the are not expected to impact annual rates
any injury, serious injury or mortality. population); of recruitment or survival.
We expect all potential takes to fall • Impacts on habitat affecting rates of NMFS does not expect pinnipeds to
under the category of Level B recruitment/survival; and permanently abandon any area that is
harassment only. • The effectiveness of monitoring and surveyed by researchers, as is evidenced
mitigation measures to reduce the by continued presence of pinnipeds at
Encouraging and Coordinating
number or severity of incidental take. the sites during annual monitoring
Research
For reasons stated previously in this counts. Based on the analysis contained
Point Blue will continue to coordinate document and based on the following herein of the likely effects of the
monitoring of pinnipeds during the factors, NMFS does not expect Point specified activity on marine mammals
research activities occurring on Blue’s specified activities to cause long- and their habitat, and taking into
Southeast Farallon Island, Año Nuevo term behavioral disturbance, consideration the implementation of the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Island, and Point Reyes National abandonment of the haul-out area, proposed mitigation and monitoring
Seashore. Point Blue conducts bone fide injury, serious injury, or mortality: measures, NMFS preliminarily finds
research on marine mammals, the (1) The takes from Level B harassment that the total marine mammal take from
results of which may contribute to the would be due to potential behavioral Point Blue’s seabird research activities
basic knowledge of marine mammal disturbance. The effects of the seabird will not adversely affect annual rates of
biology or ecology, or are likely to research activities would be limited to recruitment or survival and therefore
identify, evaluate, or resolve short-term startle responses and will have a negligible impact on the
conservation problems. localized behavioral changes due to the affected species or stocks.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices 15259

Small Numbers proposed issuance of an Authorization designees, and field crew personnel
As mentioned previously, NMFS for public review and comment. NMFS (including research collaborators from
estimates that four species of marine will review all comments submitted in Point Reyes National Seashore and
mammals could be potentially affected response to this notice as we complete Oikonos—Ecosystem Knowledge)
by Level B harassment over the course the NEPA process, including a decision operating under the authority of this
of the proposed Authorization. For each of whether to sign a Finding of No Authorization.
species, these numbers are small Significant Impact (FONSI), prior to a b. The holder must notify the
relative to the population size. These final decision on the proposed Assistant Regional Administrator for
incidental harassment numbers Authorization request. Protected Resources, West Coast Region
represent approximately 18.04 percent at least 24 hours prior to starting seabird
Proposed Authorization
of the U.S. stock of California sea lion, research activities (unless constrained
1.61 percent of the California stock of As a result of these preliminary by the date of issuance of this
Pacific harbor seal, 0.12 percent of the determinations, NMFS proposes to Authorization).
California breeding stock of northern authorize the take of marine mammals
incidental to Point Blue’s seabird 5. Mitigation Measures
elephant seal, 0.04 percent of the
California stock of northern fur seals, research activities, provided the In order to ensure the least practicable
and 0.06 percent of the eastern distinct previously mentioned mitigation, impact on the species listed in
population segment of Steller sea lion. monitoring, and reporting requirements condition 3(a), the holder of this
Because these are maximum are incorporated. The next section Authorization is required to:
estimates, actual take numbers are likely provides the proposed IHA language a. Minimize the potential for
to be lower, as some animals may select and contains a draft of the disturbance (to the lowest level
other haul-out sites the day the Authorization. The wording within this practicable near known pinniped haul-
researchers are present. section is proposed for inclusion in the outs by boat travel and pedestrian
Authorization (if issued). approach during seabird research
Impact on Availability of Affected 1. This Authorization is valid from operations). Point Blue and its designees
Species or Stock for Taking for May 2016 through April 2017. must:
Subsistence Uses 2. This Authorization is valid only for • Postpone beach landings until
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA specified activities associated with pinnipeds that may be present in the
also requires us to determine that the seabird research activities in the vicinity access areas have entered the water.
taking will not have an unmitigable of pinniped haul-out sites located on • Select a pathway of approach to
adverse effect on the availability of Southeast Farallon Island (37°41′54.32″ research sites that minimizes the
marine mammal species or stocks for N., 123°0′8.33″ W.), Año Nuevo Island number of marine mammals harassed.
subsistence use. There are no relevant (37°6′29.25″ N., 122°20′12.20″ W.), • Avoid visits to sites used by
subsistence uses of marine mammals within Point Reyes National Seashore pinnipeds for pupping.
implicated by this action. Thus, NMFS (37°59′38.61″ N., 122°58′24.90″ W.), San • Monitor for offshore predators and
has determined that the total taking of Francisco Bay, or the Russian River in not approach hauled-out pinnipeds if
affected species or stocks would not Sonoma County. great white sharks (Carcharodon
have an unmitigable adverse impact on carcharias) or killer whales (Orcinus
3. Species Authorized and Level of
the availability of such species or stocks orca) are in the area. If Point Blue and/
Takes
for taking for subsistence purposes. or its designees see predators in the
a. The taking, by Level B harassment
Endangered Species Act only, is limited to the following species: area, they must not disturb the animals
No marine mammal species listed 53,538 California sea lions (Zalophus until the area is free of predators.
under the ESA are anticipated to occur californianus), 485 Pacific harbor seals • Keep voices hushed and bodies low
in the action area. Therefore, NMFS has (Phoca vitulina), 221 northern elephant to the ground in the visual presence of
determined that a section 7 consultation seals (Mirounga angustirostris), five pinnipeds.
under the ESA is not required. northern fur seals, and 38 Steller sea • Conduct seabird observations at
lions (Eumetopias jubatus). North Landing on Southeast Farallon
National Environmental Policy Act Island in an observation blind, shielded
b. The taking by injury (Level A
(NEPA) from the view of hauled-out pinnipeds.
harassment), serious injury or death of
We have prepared a draft any of the species listed in Condition • Crawl slowly to access seabird nest
Environmental Assessment (EA) 3(a) or the taking of any kind of any boxes on Año Nuevo Island if pinnipeds
analyzing the potential effects to the other species of marine mammal is are within view.
human environment from our proposed prohibited and may result in the • Coordinate research visits to
issuance of an Authorization to Point modification, suspension or revocation intertidal areas of Southeast Farallon
Blue for their seabird research activities. of this Authorization. Island (to reduce potential take) and
The draft EA titled, Proposed Issuance c. The taking of any marine mammal coordinate research goals for Año Nuevo
of an Incidental Harassment in a manner prohibited under this Island to minimize the number of trips
Authorization to Point Blue Authorization must be reported to the island.
Conservation Science and Partners to immediately to the West Coast Regional • Coordinate monitoring schedules
Take Marine Mammals by Harassment on Año Nuevo Island, so that areas near
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Administrator, National Marine
Incidental to Seabird Research Fisheries Service (NMFS) and to the any pinnipeds would be accessed only
Conducted in Central California is Chief, Permits and Conservation once per visit.
posted on our Web site at Division, Office of Protected Resources, • Have the lead biologist serve as an
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/ NMFS. observer to evaluate incidental take.
incidental/research.htm. Information in
Point Blue’s application, NMFS’ DEA 4. General Conditions 6. Monitoring
and this notice collectively provide the a. A copy of this Authorization must The holder of this Authorization is
environmental information related to be in the possession of Point Blue, its required to:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
15260 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices

a. Record the date, time, and location the fate of the animal(s); and Request for Public Comments
(or closest point of ingress) of each visit photographs or video footage of the NMFS requests comment on the
to the research site. animal (if equipment is available). analyses, the draft Authorization, and
b. Collect the following information Point Blue shall not resume its any other aspect of the Notice of
for each visit: Composition of the activities until NMFS is able to review Proposed Incidental Harassment
marine mammals sighted, such as the circumstances of the prohibited Authorization for Point Blue’s seabird
species, gender and life history. take. NMFS will work with Point Blue research activities. Please include any
to determine what is necessary to supporting data or literature citations
7. Reporting minimize the likelihood of further with your comments to help inform our
The holder of this Authorization is prohibited take and ensure MMPA final decision on Point Blue’s request
required to: compliance. Point Blue may not resume
a. Report observations of unusual for an Authorization.
their activities until notified by NMFS
behaviors of pinnipeds to West Coast in writing via a letter or email or via the Dated: March 16, 2016.
Region fishery biologist so that the telephone. Perry F. Gayaldo,
appropriate personnel in the Regional Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Office may conduct any potential 9. Reporting an Injured or Dead Marine Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
follow-up observations. Mammal With an Unknown Cause of [FR Doc. 2016–06317 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am]
b. Draft Report: Submit a draft final Death
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
report to the Chief, Permits and In the event that Point Blue discovers
Conservation Division, Office of an injured or dead marine mammal, and
Protected Resources, Headquarters, the lead researcher determines that the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
NMFS within 60 days after the cause of the injury or death is unknown COMMISSION
expiration of the Authorization. The and the death is relatively recent (i.e., in
report will include the information less than a moderate state of Comparability Determination for the
gathered pursuant to the monitoring decomposition as described in the next European Union: Dually-Registered
requirements listed in item 6, along paragraph), Point Blue will immediately Derivatives Clearing Organizations and
with an executive summary. report the incident to the Chief, Permits Central Counterparties
c. The Draft Report shall be subject to and Conservation Division, Office of
review and comment by NMFS. Any Protected Resources and the Assistant AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading
recommendations made by NMFS must West Coast Regional Stranding Commission.
be addressed in the Final Report prior Coordinator. The report must include ACTION: Notice of Comparability
to submission to NMFS. If we decide the same information identified in the Determination for Certain Requirements
that the draft final report needs no paragraph above this section. Activities Under the European Market
comments, the draft final report will be may continue while we review the Infrastructure Regulation.
considered to be the final report. circumstances of the incident. NMFS SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures
d. Final Report: Submit a final report will work with Point Blue to determine Trading Commission (the
to the Chief, Permits and Conservation whether modifications to the activities ‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CFTC’’) has
Division, Office of Protected Resources, are appropriate. determined that certain laws and
Headquarters, NMFS within 30 days regulations applicable in the European
10. Reporting an Injured or Dead Marine
after receiving comments from us on the Union (‘‘EU’’) provide a sufficient basis
Mammal Not Related to Point Blue’s
draft final report. for an affirmative finding of
Activities
8. Reporting Prohibited Take comparability with respect to certain
In the event that Point Blue discovers
regulatory obligations applicable to
In the unanticipated event that Point an injured or dead marine mammal, and
derivatives clearing organizations
Blue’s activities cause any taking of a the lead researcher determines that the
(‘‘DCOs’’) that are registered with the
marine mammal in a manner prohibited injury or death is not associated with or
Commission and are authorized to
by the Authorization, such as an injury related to the activities authorized in the
operate as central counterparties
(Level A harassment), serious injury or Authorization (e.g., previously wounded
(‘‘CCPs’’) in the EU. The Commission’s
mortality (e.g., vessel-strike), Point Blue animal, carcass with moderate to
determination provides for substituted
shall immediately cease the specified advanced decomposition, or scavenger
compliance with respect to
activities and immediately report the damage), Point Blue will report the
requirements for financial resources,
incident to the Chief, Permits and incident to the Chief, Permits and
risk management, settlement
Conservation Division, Office of Conservation Division, Office of
procedures, and default rules and
Protected Resources, and the Assistant Protected Resources and the Assistant
procedures.
West Coast Regional Stranding West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinator. The report must include Coordinator within 24 hours of the DATES: This determination will become
the following information: discovery. Point Blue will provide effective upon publication in the
Time, date, and location (latitude/ photographs or video footage (if Federal Register.
longitude) of the incident; the name and available) or other documentation of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
type of vessel involved; the vessel’s stranded animal sighting to us and the Jeffrey M. Bandman, Acting Director,
speed during and leading up to the Marine Mammal Stranding Network. 202–418–5044, jbandman@cftc.gov;
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

incident; description of the incident; Point Blue can continue their research Robert B. Wasserman, Chief Counsel,
water depth; environmental conditions activities. 202–418–5092, rwasserman@cftc.gov;
(e.g., wind speed and direction, Beaufort 11. A copy of this Authorization must Tracey Wingate, Special Counsel, 202–
sea state, cloud cover, and visibility); be in the possession of Point Blue and 418–5319, twingate@cftc.gov, in each
description of marine mammal its designees (including contractors and case at the Division of Clearing and
observations in the 24 hours preceding marine mammal monitors) operating Risk, Commodity Futures Trading
the incident; species identification or under the authority of this Incidental Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
description of the animal(s) involved; Harassment Authorization at all times. 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:16:03
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:16:03
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request for comments.
Dates		NMFS must receive comments and information no later than April 21, 2016.
Contact		Robt Pauline, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS (301) 427-8401.
FR Citation		81 FR 15249
RIN Number		0648-XE46
81 FR 15249 - Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Seabird Research Activities in Central California, 2016-2017

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCENational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 55 (March 22, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
