81 FR 15272 - Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed Amendments
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 55 (March 22, 2016)
Office of the Secretary
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 55 (March 22, 2016)
| Page Range | 15272-15278 | |
| FR Document | 2016-06393 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 15272-15278] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-06393] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [Docket ID: DOD-2015-OS-0099] Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed Amendments AGENCY: Joint Service Committee on Military Justice (JSC), Department of Defense. ACTION: Notice of response to public comments on proposed amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2012 ed.) (MCM). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The JSC is publishing final proposed amendments to the MCM. The proposed changes concern the Rules for Courts-Martial, the Military Rules of Evidence, and the punitive articles applicable in trials by courts-martial. These proposed changes have not been coordinated within the Department of Defense under DoD Directive 5500.1, ``Preparation, Processing and Coordinating Legislation, Executive Orders, Proclamations, Views Letters and Testimony,'' June 15, 2007, and do not constitute the official position of the Department of Defense, the Military Departments, or any other Government agency. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Harlye Carlton, USMC, JSC Executive Secretary, at [email protected]. The JSC public Web site is located at http://jsc.defense.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Comments: Comments and materials received from the public are available under Docket ID Number DOD-2015-OS-0099, Federal Register Number 2015-26485, and at the following link: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=DOD-2015-OS-0099. Background On October 19, 2015 (80 FR 63204-63212), the JSC published a Notice of Proposed Amendments concerning the rules of procedure and evidence and the punitive articles applicable in trials by courts-martial and a Notice of Public Meeting to receive comments on these proposals. The public meeting was held on November 5, 2015. No comments were received at the public meeting. The 60-day public comment period for the notice closed on December 18, 2015. One public comment was received. The JSC considered the public comments and after conducting deliberations, made no modifications to the proposed amendments to the MCM as a result of the public comments. The JSC conducted additional internal deliberations and made some modifications to the proposed amendments to the MCM accordingly. Comments that were submitted that are outside the scope of the originally-proposed changes will be considered as part of the JSC 2016 annual review of the MCM. Proposed Amendments After Period for Public Comment The proposed recommended amendments to the MCM that have been forwarded through the DoD for action by Executive Order of the President of the United States are as follows: Section 1. Part II of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows: (a) The title of R.C.M. 104(b)(1) is amended to read as follows: ``(1) Evaluation of member, defense counsel, or special victims' counsel.'' (b) R.C.M. 104(b)(1)(B) is amended to read as follows: ``(B) Give a less favorable rating or evaluation of any defense counsel or special victims' counsel because of the zeal with which such counsel represented any client. As used in this rule, ``special victims' counsel'' are judge advocates who, in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 1044e, are designated as Special Victims' Counsel by the Judge Advocate General of the armed force in which the judge advocates are members, and within the Marine Corps, by the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.'' (c) R.C.M. 305(h)(2)(B)(iii)(a) is amended to read as follows: ``(a) The prisoner will not appear at trial, pretrial hearing, preliminary hearing, or investigation, or'' [[Page 15273]] (d) R.C.M. 305(i)(2)(A)(iv) is amended to read as follows: ``(iv) Victim's right to be reasonably heard. A victim of an alleged offense committed by the prisoner has the right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of the 7-day review; the right to confer with the representative of the command and counsel for the government, if any; and the right to be reasonably heard during the review. However, the hearing may not be unduly delayed for this purpose. The right to be heard under this rule includes the right to be heard through counsel and the right to be reasonably protected from the prisoner during the 7-day review. The victim of an alleged offense shall be notified of these rights in accordance with regulations of the Secretary concerned.'' (e) A new R.C.M. 306(e) is inserted and reads as follows: ``(e) Sex-related offenses. (1) For purposes of this subsection, a ``sex-related offense'' means any allegation of a violation of Article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 or any attempt thereof under Article 80, UCMJ. (2) Under such regulations as the Secretary concerned may prescribe, for alleged sex-related offenses committed in the United States, the victim of the sex-related offense shall be provided an opportunity to express views as to whether the offense should be prosecuted by court-martial or in a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense. The commander, and if charges are preferred, the convening authority, shall consider such views as to the victim's preference for jurisdiction, if available, prior to making an initial disposition decision. For purposes of this rule, ``victim'' is defined as an individual who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of an alleged sex-related offense as defined in subparagraph (A) of this rule. (3) Under such regulations as the Secretary concerned may prescribe, if the victim of an alleged sex-related offense expresses a preference for prosecution of the offense in a civilian court, the commander, and if charges are preferred, the convening authority, shall ensure that the civilian authority with jurisdiction over the offense is notified of the victim's preference for civilian prosecution. If the commander, and if charges are preferred, the convening authority learns of any decision by the civilian authority to prosecute or not prosecute the offense in civilian court, the convening authority shall ensure the victim is notified.'' (f) R.C.M. 403(b)(5) is amended to read as follows: ``(5) Unless otherwise prescribed by the Secretary concerned, direct a preliminary hearing under R.C.M. 405, and, if appropriate, forward the report of preliminary hearing with the charges to a superior commander for disposition.'' (g) R.C.M. 405(i)(2)(A) is amended to read as follows: ``(2) Notice to and presence of the victim(s). (A) The victim(s) of an offense under the UCMJ has the right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of a preliminary hearing relating to the alleged offense, the right to be reasonably protected from the accused, and the reasonable right to confer with counsel for the government during the preliminary hearing. For the purposes of this rule, a ``victim'' is a person who is alleged to have suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the matters set forth in a charge or specification under consideration and is named in one of the specifications under consideration.'' (h) R.C.M. 407(a)(5) is amended to read as follows: ``(5) Unless otherwise prescribed by the Secretary concerned, direct a preliminary hearing under R.C.M. 405, after which additional action under this rule may be taken;'' (i) R.C.M. 502(d)(4)(B) is amended to read as follows: ``(B) An investigating or preliminary hearing officer;'' (j) RCM 502(e)(2)(C) is amended to read as follows: ``(C) An investigating or preliminary hearing officer;'' (k) R.C.M. 506(b)(2) is amended by replacing ``investigation'' with ``preliminary hearing.'' (l) R.C.M 601(d)(2)(A) is amended to read as follows: ``(A) There has been substantial compliance with the preliminary hearing requirements of R.C.M. 405; and'' (m) R.C.M. 705(c)(2)(A) is amended to read as follows: ``(A) A promise to enter into a stipulation of fact concerning offenses to which a plea of guilty or a confessional stipulation will be entered;'' (n) R.C.M. 705(d)(3) is amended to read as follows: ``(3) Acceptance. (A) In general. The convening authority may either accept or reject an offer of the accused to enter into a pretrial agreement or may propose by counteroffer any terms or conditions not prohibited by law or public policy. The decision whether to accept or reject an offer is within the sole discretion of the convening authority. When the convening authority has accepted a pretrial agreement, the agreement shall be signed by the convening authority or by a person, such as the staff judge advocate or trial counsel, who has been authorized by the convening authority to sign. (B) Victim consultation. Whenever practicable, prior to the convening authority accepting a pretrial agreement the victim shall be provided an opportunity to express views concerning the pretrial agreement terms and conditions in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned. The convening authority shall consider any such views provided prior to accepting a pretrial agreement. For purposes of this rule, a ``victim'' is an individual who is alleged to have suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the matters set forth in a charge or specification under consideration and is named in one of the specifications under consideration.'' (o) A new R.C.M. 806(b)(2) is inserted and reads as follows: ``(2) Right of victim to notice. A victim of an alleged offense committed by the accused has the right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of court-martial proceedings relating to the offense.'' (p) R.C.M. 806(b)(2) is renumbered as R.C.M. 806(b)(3). (q) R.C.M. 806(b)(3) is renumbered as R.C.M. 806(b)(4). (r) R.C.M. 806(b)(4) is renumbered as R.C.M. 806(b)(5). (s) A new R.C.M. 806(b)(6) is inserted and reads as follows: ``(6) Right of victim to be reasonably protected from the accused. A victim of an alleged offense committed by the accused has the right to be reasonably protected from the accused.'' (t) R.C.M. 902(b)(2) is amended to read as follows: ``(2) Where the military judge has acted as counsel, preliminary hearing officer, investigating officer, legal officer, staff judge advocate, or convening authority as to any offense charged or in the same case generally.'' (u) R.C.M. 905(b)(1) is amended to read as follows: ``(1) Defenses or objections based on defects (other than jurisdictional defects) in the preferral, forwarding, or referral of charges, or in the preliminary hearing;'' (v) R.C.M. 907(b)(1) is amended to read as follows: ``(1) Nonwaivable grounds. A charge or specification shall be dismissed at any stage of the proceedings if the court-martial lacks jurisdiction to try the accused for the offense.'' (w) R.C.M. 907(b)(1)(A)-(B) is deleted. [[Page 15274]] (x) A new R.C.M. 907(b)(2)(E) is inserted and reads as follows: ``(E) The specification fails to state an offense.'' (y) R.C.M. 912(a)(1)(K) is amended to read as follows: ``(K) Whether the member has acted as accuser, counsel, preliminary hearing officer, investigating officer, convening authority, or legal officer or staff judge advocate for the convening authority in the case, or has forwarded the charges with a recommendation as to disposition.'' (z) R.C.M. 912(f)(1)(F) is amended to read as follows: ``(F) Has been an investigating or preliminary hearing officer as to any offense charged;'' (aa) R.C.M. 1002 is amended to read as follows: ``(a) Generally. Subject to limitations in this Manual, the sentence to be adjudged is a matter within the discretion of the court- martial; except when a mandatory minimum sentence is prescribed by the code, a court-martial may adjudge any punishment authorized in this Manual, including the maximum punishment or any lesser punishment, or may adjudge a sentence of no punishment. (b) Unitary Sentencing. Sentencing by a court-martial is unitary. The court-martial will adjudge a single sentence for all the offenses of which the accused was found guilty. A court-martial may not impose separate sentences for each finding of guilty, but may impose only a single, unitary sentence covering all of the guilty findings in their entirety.'' (bb) R.C.M. 1103(b)(2)(B)(i) is amended to read as follows: ``(i) The sentence adjudged includes confinement for twelve months or more or any punishment that may not be adjudged by a special court- martial; or'' (cc) The Note currently located immediately following the title of R.C.M. 1107 and prior to R.C.M. 1107(a) is amended to read as follows: ``[Note: R.C.M. 1107(b)-(f) apply to offenses committed on or after 24 June 2014; however, if at least one offense resulting in a finding of guilty in a case occurred prior to 24 June 2014, or includes a date range where the earliest date in the range for that offense is before 24 June 2014, then the prior version of R.C.M. 1107 applies to all offenses in the case, except that mandatory minimum sentences under Article 56(b) and applicable rules under R.C.M. 1107(d)(1)(D)-(E) still apply.]'' (dd) R.C.M. 1107(b)(5) is amended to delete the sentence, ``Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit the convening authority from disapproving the findings of guilty and sentence.'' (ee) R.C.M. 1107(c) is amended to read as follows: ``(c) Action on findings. Action on the findings is not required. However, the convening authority may take action subject to the following limitations: (1) Where a court-martial includes a finding of guilty for an offense listed in subparagraph (c)(1)(A) of this rule, the convening authority may not take the actions listed in subparagraph (c)(1)(B) of this rule: (A) Offenses (i) Article 120(a) or (b), Article 120b, or Article 125; (ii) Offenses for which the maximum sentence of confinement that may be adjudged exceeds two years without regard to the jurisdictional limits of the court; or (iii) Offenses where the adjudged sentence for the case includes dismissal, dishonorable discharge, bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for more than six months. (B) Prohibited actions (i) Dismiss a charge or specification by setting aside a finding of guilty thereto; or (ii) Change a finding of guilty to a charge or specification to a finding of guilty to an offense that is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the charge or specification. (2) The convening authority may direct a rehearing in accordance with subsection (e) of this rule. (3) For offenses other than those listed in subparagraph (c)(1)(A) of this rule: (A) The convening authority may change a finding of guilty to a charge or specification to a finding of guilty to an offense that is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the charge or specification; or (B) Set aside any finding of guilty and: (i) Dismiss the specification and, if appropriate, the charge; or (ii) Direct a rehearing in accordance with subsection (e) of this rule. (4) If the convening authority acts to dismiss or change any charge or specification for an offense, the convening authority shall provide, at the same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the record of trial and action thereon.'' (ff) R.C.M. 1107(d) is amended to read as follows: ``(d) Action on the sentence. (1) The convening authority shall take action on the sentence subject to the following: (A) The convening authority may disapprove, commute, or suspend, in whole or in part, any portion of an adjudged sentence not explicitly prohibited by this rule, to include reduction in pay grade, forfeitures of pay and allowances, fines, reprimands, restrictions, and hard labor without confinement. (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (d)(1)(C) of this rule, the convening authority may not disapprove, commute, or suspend, in whole or in part, that portion of an adjudged sentence that includes: (i) confinement for more than six months; or (ii) dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad-conduct discharge. (C) Exceptions (i) Trial counsel recommendation. Upon the recommendation of the trial counsel, in recognition of the substantial assistance by the accused in the investigation or prosecution of another person who has committed an offense, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this rule shall have the authority to disapprove, commute, or suspend the adjudged sentence, in whole or in part, even with respect to an offense for which a mandatory minimum sentence exists. (ii) Pretrial agreement. If a pretrial agreement has been entered into by the convening authority and the accused, as authorized by R.C.M. 705, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this rule shall have the authority to approve, disapprove, commute, or suspend a sentence, in whole or in part, pursuant to the terms of the pretrial agreement. However, if a mandatory minimum sentence of a dishonorable discharge applies to an offense for which an accused has been convicted, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this rule may commute the dishonorable discharge to a bad-conduct discharge pursuant to the terms of the pretrial agreement. (D) If the convening authority acts to disapprove, commute, or suspend, in whole or in part, the sentence of the court-martial for an offense listed in subparagraph (c)(1)(A) of this rule, the convening authority shall provide, at the same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the record of trial and action thereon.'' (gg) R.C.M. 1107(e) is amended to read as follows: ``(e) Ordering rehearing or other trial. (1) Rehearings not permitted. A rehearing may not be ordered by the convening authority where the adjudged sentence for the case includes a sentence of dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad-conduct discharge or confinement for more than six months. (2) Rehearings permitted. [[Page 15275]] (A) In general. Subject to paragraph (e)(1) and subparagraphs (e)(2)(B) through (e)(2)(E) of this rule, the convening authority may in the convening authority's discretion order a rehearing. A rehearing may be ordered as to some or all offenses of which findings of guilty were entered and the sentence, or as to sentence only. (B) When the convening authority may order a rehearing. The convening authority may order a rehearing: (i) When taking action on the court-martial under this rule. Prior to ordering a rehearing on a finding, the convening authority must disapprove the applicable finding and the sentence and state the reasons for disapproval of said finding. Prior to ordering a rehearing on the sentence, the convening authority must disapprove the sentence. (ii) When authorized to do so by superior competent authority. If the convening authority finds a rehearing as to any offenses impracticable, the convening authority may dismiss those specifications and, when appropriate, charges. (iii) Sentence reassessment. If a superior competent authority has approved some of the findings of guilty and has authorized a rehearing as to other offenses and the sentence, the convening authority may, unless otherwise directed, reassess the sentence based on the approved findings of guilty and dismiss the remaining charges. Reassessment is appropriate only where the convening authority determines that the accused's sentence would have been at least of a certain magnitude had the prejudicial error not been committed and the reassessed sentence is appropriate in relation to the affirmed findings of guilty.'' (C) Limitations. (i) Sentence approved. A rehearing shall not be ordered if, in the same action, a sentence is approved. (ii) Lack of sufficient evidence. A rehearing may not be ordered as to findings of guilty when there is a lack of sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings of guilty of the offense charged or of any lesser included offense. A rehearing may be ordered, however, if the proof of guilt consisted of inadmissible evidence for which there is available an admissible substitute. A rehearing may be ordered as to any lesser offense included in an offense of which the accused was found guilty, provided there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the lesser included offense. (iii) Rehearing on sentence only. A rehearing on sentence only shall not be referred to a different kind of court-martial from that which made the original findings. If the convening authority determines a rehearing on sentence is impracticable, the convening authority may approve a sentence of no punishment without conducting a rehearing. (D) Additional charges. Additional charges may be referred for trial together with charges as to which a rehearing has been directed. (E) Lesser included offenses. If at a previous trial the accused was convicted of a lesser included offense, a rehearing may be ordered only as to that included offense or as to an offense included in that found. If, however, a rehearing is ordered improperly on the original offense charged and the accused is convicted of that offense at the rehearing, the finding as to the lesser included offense of which the accused was convicted at the original trial may nevertheless be approved. (3) ``Other'' trial. The convening or higher authority may order an ``other'' trial if the original proceedings were invalid because of lack of jurisdiction or failure of a specification to state an offense. The authority ordering an ``other'' trial shall state in the action the basis for declaring the proceedings invalid.'' (hh) The Note currently located immediately following the title of R.C.M. 1108(b) and prior to the first line, ``The convening authority may . . .'', is amended to read as follows: ``[Note: R.C.M. 1108(b) applies to offenses committed on or after 24 June 2014; however, if at least one offense in a case occurred prior to 24 June 2014, then the prior version of R.C.M. 1108(b) applies to all offenses in the case.]'' (ii) R.C.M. 1109(a) is amended to read as follows: ``(a) In general. Suspension of execution of the sentence of a court-martial may be vacated for violation of any condition of the suspension as provided in this rule.'' (jj) R.C.M. 1109(c)(4)(A) is amended to read as follows: ``(A) Rights of probationer. Before the preliminary hearing, the probationer shall be notified in writing of:'' (kk) R.C.M. 1109(c)(4)(C) is amended to read as follows: ``(C) Decision. The hearing officer shall determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the probationer violated the conditions of the probationer's suspension. If the hearing officer determines that probable cause is lacking, the hearing officer shall issue a written order directing that the probationer be released from confinement. If the hearing officer determines that there is probable cause to believe that the probationer violated a condition of suspension, the hearing officer shall set forth this determination in a written memorandum that details therein the evidence relied upon and reasons for making the decision. The hearing officer shall forward the original memorandum or release order to the probationer's commander and forward a copy to the probationer and the officer in charge of the confinement facility.'' (ll) A new sentence is added to the end of R.C.M. 1109(d)(1)(A) and reads as follows: ``The purpose of the hearing is for the hearing officer to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the probationer violated a condition of the probationer's suspension.'' (mm) R.C.M. 1109(d)(1)(C) is amended to read as follows: ``(C) Hearing. The procedure for the vacation hearing shall follow that prescribed in subsection (h) of this rule.'' (nn) A new sentence is added to the end of R.C.M. 1109(d)(1)(D) and reads as follows: ``This record shall include the recommendation, the evidence relied upon, and reasons for making the decision.'' (oo) R.C.M. 1109(d)(2)(A) is amended to read as follows: ``(A) In general. The officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction over the probationer shall review the record produced by and the recommendation of the officer exercising special court-martial jurisdiction over the probationer, decide whether there is probable cause to believe that the probationer violated a condition of the probationer's suspension, and, if so, decide whether to vacate the suspended sentence. If the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction decides to vacate the suspended sentence, that officer shall prepare a written statement of the evidence relied on and the reasons for vacating the suspended sentence.'' (pp) A new sentence is added to the end of R.C.M. 1109(e)(1) and reads as follows: ``The purpose of the hearing is for the hearing officer to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the probationer violated the conditions of the probationer's suspension.'' (qq) R.C.M. 1109(e)(3) is amended to read as follows: ``(3) Hearing. The procedure for the vacation hearing shall follow that prescribed in subsection (h) of this rule.'' (rr) A new sentence is added to the end of R.C.M. 1109(e)(5) and reads as follows: [[Page 15276]] ``This record shall include the recommendation, the evidence relied upon, and reasons for making the decision.'' (ss) R.C.M. 1109(e)(6) is amended to read as follows: ``(6) Decision. The special court-martial convening authority shall review the record produced by and the recommendation of the person who conducted the vacation proceeding, decide whether there is probable cause to believe that the probationer violated a condition of the probationer's suspension, and, if so, decide whether to vacate the suspended sentence. If the officer exercising jurisdiction decides to vacate the suspended sentence, that officer shall prepare a written statement of the evidence relied on and the reasons for vacating the suspended sentence.'' (tt) A new sentence is added to the end of R.C.M. 1109(g)(1) and reads as follows: ``The purpose of the hearing is for the hearing officer to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the probationer violated the conditions of the probationer's suspension.'' (uu) R.C.M. 1109(g)(3) is amended to read as follows: ``(3) Hearing. The procedure for the vacation hearing shall follow that prescribed in subsection (h) of this rule.'' (vv) A new sentence is added to the end of R.C.M. 1109(g)(5) and reads as follows: ``This record shall include the recommendation, the evidence relied upon, and reasons for making the decision.'' (ww) R.C.M. 1109(g)(6) is amended to read as follows: ``(6) Decision. A commander with authority to vacate the suspension shall review the record produced by and the recommendation of the person who conducted the vacation proceeding, decide whether there is probable cause to believe that the probationer violated a condition of the probationer's suspension, and, if so, decide whether to vacate the suspended sentence. If the officer exercising jurisdiction decides to vacate the suspended sentence, that officer shall prepare a written statement of the evidence relied on and the reasons for vacating the suspended sentence.'' (xx) A new R.C.M. 1109(h) is inserted and reads as follows: ``(h) Hearing procedure. (1) Generally. The hearing shall begin with the hearing officer informing the probationer of the probationer's rights. The government will then present evidence. Upon the conclusion of the government's presentation of evidence, the probationer may present evidence. The probationer shall have full opportunity to present any matters in defense, extenuation, or mitigation. Both the government and probationer shall be afforded an opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses. The hearing officer may also question witnesses called by the parties. (2) Rules of evidence. The Military Rules of Evidence--other than Mil. R. Evid. 301, 302, 303, 305, 412, and Section V--shall not apply. Nor shall Mil. R. Evid. 412(b)(1)(C) apply. In applying these rules to a vacation hearing, the term ``military judge,'' as used in these rules, shall mean the hearing officer, who shall assume the military judge's authority to exclude evidence from the hearing, and who shall, in discharging this duty, follow the procedures set forth in these rules. However, the hearing officer is not authorized to order production of communications covered by Mil. R. Evid. 513 or 514. (3) Production of witnesses and other evidence. The procedure for the production of witnesses and other evidence shall follow that prescribed in R.C.M. 405(g), except that R.C.M. 405(g)(3)(B) shall not apply. The hearing officer shall only consider testimony and other evidence that is relevant to the limited purpose of the hearing. (4) Presentation of testimony. Witness testimony may be provided in person, by video teleconference, by telephone, or by similar means of remote testimony. All testimony shall be taken under oath, except that the probationer may make an unsworn statement. (5) Other evidence. If relevant to the limited purpose of the hearing, and not cumulative, a hearing officer may consider other evidence, in addition to or in lieu of witness testimony, including statements, tangible evidence, or reproductions thereof, offered by either side, that the hearing officer determines is reliable. This other evidence need not be sworn. (6) Presence of probationer. The taking of evidence shall not be prevented and the probationer shall be considered to have waived the right to be present whenever the probationer: (A) After being notified of the time and place of the proceeding is voluntarily absent; or (B) After being warned by the hearing officer that disruptive conduct will cause removal from the proceeding, persists in conduct that is such as to justify exclusion from the proceeding. (7) Objections. Any objection alleging failure to comply with these rules shall be made to the convening authority via the hearing officer. The hearing officer shall include a record of all objections in the written recommendations to the convening authority. (8) Access by spectators. Vacation hearings are public proceedings and should remain open to the public whenever possible. The convening authority who directed the hearing or the hearing officer may restrict or foreclose access by spectators to all or part of the proceedings if an overriding interest exists that outweighs the value of an open hearing. Examples of overriding interests may include: Preventing psychological harm or trauma to a child witness or an alleged victim of a sexual crime, protecting the safety or privacy of a witness or alleged victim, protecting classified material, and receiving evidence where a witness is incapable of testifying in an open setting. Any closure must be narrowly tailored to achieve the overriding interest that justified the closure. Convening authorities or hearing officers must conclude that no lesser methods short of closing the hearing can be used to protect the overriding interest in the case. Convening authorities or hearing officers must conduct a case-by-case, witness- by-witness, circumstance-by-circumstance analysis of whether closure is necessary. If a convening authority or hearing officer believes closing the hearing is necessary, the convening authority or hearing officer must make specific findings of fact in writing that support the closure. The written findings of fact must be included in the record. (9) Victim's rights. Any victim of the underlying offense for which the probationer received the suspended sentence, or any victim of the alleged offense that is the subject of the vacation hearing, has the right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of the vacation hearing. For purposes of this rule, the term ``victim'' is defined as an individual who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of an offense.'' (yy) A new R.C.M. 1203(g) is inserted and reads as follows: ``(g) Article 6b(e) petition for writ of mandamus. The Judge Advocates General shall establish the means by which the petitions for writs of mandamus described in Article 6b(e) are forwarded to the Courts of Criminal Appeals in accordance with their rule-making functions of Article 66(f).'' Sec. 2. Part III of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows: (a) Mil. R. Evid. 304(c) is amended to read as follows: [[Page 15277]] ``(c) Corroboration of a Confession or Admission. (1) An admission or a confession of the accused may be considered as evidence against the accused on the question of guilt or innocence only if independent evidence, either direct or circumstantial, has been admitted into evidence that would tend to establish the trustworthiness of the admission or confession. (2) Other uncorroborated confessions or admissions of the accused that would themselves require corroboration may not be used to supply this independent evidence. If the independent evidence raises an inference of the truth of the admission or confession, then it may be considered as evidence against the accused. Not every element or fact contained in the confession or admission must be independently proven for the confession or admission to be admitted into evidence in its entirety. (3) Corroboration is not required for a statement made by the accused before the court by which the accused is being tried, for statements made prior to or contemporaneously with the act, or for statements offered under a rule of evidence other than that pertaining to the admissibility of admissions or confessions. (4) Quantum of Evidence Needed. The independent evidence necessary to establish corroboration need not be sufficient of itself to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the truth of facts stated in the admission or confession. The independent evidence need raise only an inference of the truth of the admission or confession. The amount and type of evidence introduced as corroboration is a factor to be considered by the trier of fact in determining the weight, if any, to be given to the admission or confession. (5) Procedure. The military judge alone is to determine when adequate evidence of corroboration has been received. Corroborating evidence must be introduced before the admission or confession is introduced unless the military judge allows submission of such evidence subject to later corroboration.'' (b) Mil. R. Evid. 311(a) is amended to read as follows: ``(a) General rule. Evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search or seizure made by a person acting in a governmental capacity is inadmissible against the accused if: (1) the accused makes a timely motion to suppress or an objection to the evidence under this rule; (2) the accused had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the person, place or property searched; the accused had a legitimate interest in the property or evidence seized when challenging a seizure; or the accused would otherwise have grounds to object to the search or seizure under the Constitution of the United States as applied to members of the Armed Forces; and (3) exclusion of the evidence results in appreciable deterrence of future unlawful searches or seizures and the benefits of such deterrence outweigh the costs to the justice system.'' (c) A new Mil. R. Evid. 311(c)(4) is inserted and reads as follows: ``(4) Reliance on Statute. Evidence that was obtained as a result of an unlawful search or seizure may be used when the official seeking the evidence acts in objectively reasonable reliance on a statute later held violative of the Fourth Amendment.'' (d) Mil. R. Evid. 311(d)(5)(A) is amended to read as follows: ``(A) In general. When the defense makes an appropriate motion or objection under subdivision (d), the prosecution has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the evidence was not obtained as a result of an unlawful search or seizure, that the evidence would have been obtained even if the unlawful search or seizure had not been made, that the evidence was obtained by officials who reasonably and with good faith relied on the issuance of an authorization to search, seize, or apprehend or a search warrant or an arrest warrant; that the evidence was obtained by officials in objectively reasonable reliance on a statute later held violative of the Fourth Amendment; or that the deterrence of future unlawful searches or seizures is not appreciable or such deterrence does not outweigh the costs to the justice system of excluding the evidence.'' (e) Mil. R. Evid. 414(d)(2)(A) is amended to read as follows: ``(A) any conduct prohibited by Article 120 and committed with a child, or prohibited by Article 120b.'' (f) Mil. R. Evid. 504 is amended to read as follows: ``Rule 504. Marital privilege (a) Spousal Incapacity. A person has a privilege to refuse to testify against his or her spouse. There is no privilege under subdivision (a) when, at the time of the testimony, the parties are divorced, or the marriage has been annulled. (b) Confidential Communication Made During the Marriage. (1) General Rule. A person has a privilege during and after the marital relationship to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, any confidential communication made to the spouse of the person while they were married and not separated as provided by law. (2) Who May Claim the Privilege. The privilege may be claimed by the spouse who made the communication or by the other spouse on his or her behalf. The authority of the latter spouse to do so is presumed in the absence of evidence of a waiver. The privilege will not prevent disclosure of the communication at the request of the spouse to whom the communication was made if that spouse is an accused regardless of whether the spouse who made the communication objects to its disclosure. (c) Exceptions. (1) To Confidential Communications Only. Where both parties have been substantial participants in illegal activity, those communications between the spouses during the marriage regarding the illegal activity in which they have jointly participated are not marital communications for purposes of the privilege in subdivision (b) and are not entitled to protection under the privilege in subdivision (b). (2) To Spousal Incapacity and Confidential Communications. There is no privilege under subdivisions (a) or (b): (A) In proceedings in which one spouse is charged with a crime against the person or property of the other spouse or a child of either, or with a crime against the person or property of a third person committed in the course of committing a crime against the other spouse; (B) When the marital relationship was entered into with no intention of the parties to live together as spouses, but only for the purpose of using the purported marital relationship as a sham, and with respect to the privilege in subdivision (a), the relationship remains a sham at the time the testimony or statement of one of the parties is to be introduced against the other; or with respect to the privilege in subdivision (b), the relationship was a sham at the time of the communication; or (C) In proceedings in which a spouse is charged, in accordance with Article 133 or 134, with importing the other spouse as an alien for prostitution or other immoral purpose in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1328; with transporting the other spouse in interstate commerce for prostitution, immoral purposes, or another offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2421-2424; or with violation of such other similar statutes under which such privilege may not be claimed in the trial of criminal cases in the United States district courts. (d) Definitions. As used in this rule: [[Page 15278]] (1) ``A child of either'' means a biological child, adopted child, or ward of one of the spouses and includes a child who is under the permanent or temporary physical custody of one of the spouses, regardless of the existence of a legal parent-child relationship. For purposes of this rule only, a child is: (A) An individual under the age of 18; or (B) an individual with a mental handicap who functions under the age of 18. (2) ``Temporary physical custody'' means a parent has entrusted his or her child with another. There is no minimum amount of time necessary to establish temporary physical custody, nor is a written agreement required. Rather, the focus is on the parent's agreement with another for assuming parental responsibility for the child. For example, temporary physical custody may include instances where a parent entrusts another with the care of his or her child for recurring care or during absences due to temporary duty or deployments. (3) As used in this rule, a communication is ``confidential'' if made privately by any person to the spouse of the person and is not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than those reasonably necessary for transmission of the communication.'' (g) Mil. R. Evid. 505(e)(2) is amended by replacing ``investigating officer'' with ``preliminary hearing officer.'' (h) Mil. R. Evid. 801(d)(1)(B) is amended to read as follows: ``(B) is consistent with the declarant's testimony and is offered: (i) to rebut an express or implied charge that the declarant recently fabricated it or acted from a recent improper influence or motive in so testifying; or (ii) to rehabilitate the declarant's credibility as a witness when attacked on another ground; or'' (i) The first sentence of Mil. R. Evid. 803(6)(E) is amended to read as follows: ``(E) the opponent does not show that the source of information or the method or circumstance of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness.'' (j) Mil. R. Evid. 803(7)(C) is amended to read as follows: ``(C) the opponent does not show that the possible source of the information or other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness.'' (k) The first sentence of Mil. R. Evid. 803(8)(B) is amended to read as follows: ``(B) the opponent does not show that the source of information or other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness.'' (l) Mil. R. Evid. 803(10)(B) is amended to read as follows: ``(B) a counsel for the government who intends to offer a certification provides written notice of that intent at least 14 days before trial, and the accused does not object in writing within 7 days of receiving the notice--unless the military judge sets a different time for the notice or the objection.'' (m) Mil. R. Evid. 804(b)(1)(B) is amended by replacing ``pretrial investigation'' with ``preliminary hearing.'' (n) Mil. R. Evid. 1101(d)(2) is amended by replacing ``pretrial investigations'' with ``preliminary hearings.'' Sec. 3. Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows: (a) Paragraph 4, Article 80--Attempts, subparagraph e. is amended to read as follows: ``e. Maximum punishment. Any person subject to the code who is found guilty of an attempt under Article 80 to commit any offense punishable by the code shall be subject to the same maximum punishment authorized for the commission of the offense attempted, except that in no case shall the death penalty be adjudged, and in no case, other than attempted murder, shall confinement exceeding 20 years be adjudged. Except in the cases of attempts of Article 120(a) or (b), rape or sexual assault of a child under Article 120b(a) or (b), and forcible sodomy under Article 125, mandatory minimum punishment provisions shall not apply.'' (b) Paragraph 57, Article 131--Perjury, subparagraph c.(1) is amended by replacing ``an investigation'' with ``a preliminary hearing.'' (c) Paragraph 57, Article 131--Perjury, subparagraph c.(3) is amended by replacing ``investigation'' with ``preliminary hearing.'' (d) Paragraph 96, Article 134--Obstructing justice, subparagraph f. is amended to read as follows: ``f. Sample specification. In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board--location) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about 20, wrongfully (endeavor to) (impede (a trial by court-martial) (an investigation) (a preliminary hearing) (__)) [influence the actions of __, (a trial counsel of the court-martial) (a defense counsel of the court-martial) (an officer responsible for making a recommendation concerning disposition of charges) (__)] [(influence) (alter) the testimony of __as a witness before a (court- martial) (an investigating officer) (a preliminary hearing) (__)] in the case of __by [(promising) (offering) (giving) to the said, (the sum of $) (__, of a value of about $)] [communicating to the said __a threat to __] [__], (if) (unless) he/she, the said __, would [recommend dismissal of the charges against said __] [(wrongfully refuse to testify) (testify falsely concerning __) (__)] [(at such trial) (before such investigating officer) (before such preliminary hearing officer)] [__].'' (e) Paragraph 108, Testify: Wrongful refusal, subparagraph f. is amended by replacing ``officer conducting an investigation under Article 32, Uniform Code of Military Justice'' with ``officer conducting a preliminary hearing under Article 32, Uniform Code of Military Justice.'' (f) Paragraph 110, Article 134--Threat, communicating, subparagraph c. is amended to read as follows: ``c. Explanation. For purposes of this paragraph, to establish that the communication was wrongful it is necessary that the accused transmitted the communication for the purpose of issuing a threat, with the knowledge that the communication would be viewed as a threat, or acted recklessly with regard to whether the communication would be viewed as a threat. However, it is not necessary to establish that the accused actually intended to do the injury threatened. Nor is the offense committed by the mere statement of intent to commit an unlawful act not involving injury to another. See also paragraph 109, Threat or hoax designed or intended to cause panic or public fear.'' Dated: March 17, 2016. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2016-06393 Filed 3-21-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
![15272 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices
the corresponding European Market made needlessly complex because both the following link: http://www.regulations.
Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) EC and the CFTC insisted on a line-by-line gov/#!docketDetail;D=DOD-2015-OS-
requirements. rule analysis contrary to the flexible, 0099.
The equivalence agreement announced by outcomes-based approach advocated by the
European Commissioner Jonathan Hill and OTC Derivatives Regulators Group. While the Background
myself is an important step in achieving end result is a good one, the approach taken
cross-border harmonization of derivatives to get here was needlessly circuitous and On October 19, 2015 (80 FR 63204–
regulation. It provides a foundation for uncertain. 63212), the JSC published a Notice of
cooperation among regulators in the The CFTC and its global counterparts must Proposed Amendments concerning the
oversight of the global clearinghouses that are now recommit themselves to work together to rules of procedure and evidence and the
so important in our financial system today. implement an equivalence and substituted punitive articles applicable in trials by
It resolves the issues that were standing in compliance process, particularly for swaps courts-martial and a Notice of Public
the way of Europe recognizing U.S. CCPs. execution and the cross-border activities of Meeting to receive comments on these
And it helps make sure that the U.S. and swap dealers and major swaps participants,
European derivatives markets can continue to based on common principles in order to
proposals. The public meeting was held
be dynamic, with robust competition and increase regulatory harmonization and on November 5, 2015. No comments
liquidity across borders. reduce market balkanization.1 The future of were received at the public meeting.
The action we have taken today is an the global swaps marketplace depends on it. The 60-day public comment period for
important component of that agreement. The [FR Doc. 2016–06261 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am] the notice closed on December 18, 2015.
notice identifies the rules for which the One public comment was received.
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
CFTC will grant substituted compliance. The JSC considered the public
These include rules related to CCP financial comments and after conducting
resources, risk management, settlement
procedures, and default management. We DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE deliberations, made no modifications to
have also streamlined the process for the proposed amendments to the MCM
registration, which will further harmonize Office of the Secretary as a result of the public comments. The
our regimes. JSC conducted additional internal
Finally, CFTC staff today are also [Docket ID: DOD–2015–OS–0099] deliberations and made some
providing no-action relief from the modifications to the proposed
application of Commission regulations to Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed
Amendments amendments to the MCM accordingly.
discrete aspects of a clearinghouse’s non-U.S. Comments that were submitted that are
clearing activities.
The Commission is working with U.S.
AGENCY: Joint Service Committee on outside the scope of the originally-
clearinghouses seeking recognition by the Military Justice (JSC), Department of proposed changes will be considered as
European Securities and Market Authority Defense. part of the JSC 2016 annual review of
(ESMA) to ensure ESMA has all necessary ACTION: Notice of response to public the MCM.
information to review their applications in a comments on proposed amendments to
timely manner. I look forward to ESMA Proposed Amendments After Period for
the Manual for Courts-Martial, United Public Comment
completing the recognition process in a States (2012 ed.) (MCM).
manner that ensures the global derivatives The proposed recommended
markets can continue to function efficiently SUMMARY: The JSC is publishing final amendments to the MCM that have been
and without disruption. proposed amendments to the MCM. The forwarded through the DoD for action by
Appendix 3—Statement of proposed changes concern the Rules for Executive Order of the President of the
Commissioner J. Christopher Giancarlo Courts-Martial, the Military Rules of United States are as follows:
Evidence, and the punitive articles Section 1. Part II of the Manual for
I support the comparability determinations
applicable in trials by courts-martial. Courts-Martial, United States, is
issued by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘CFTC’’). These proposed changes have not been amended as follows:
Today’s action furthers the commitment to coordinated within the Department of (a) The title of R.C.M. 104(b)(1) is
a common approach for transatlantic central Defense under DoD Directive 5500.1, amended to read as follows:
clearing counterparties (CCPs) announced on ‘‘Preparation, Processing and ‘‘(1) Evaluation of member, defense
February 10, 2016 by my colleague, CFTC Coordinating Legislation, Executive counsel, or special victims’ counsel.’’
Chairman Timothy Massad, and Orders, Proclamations, Views Letters
Commissioner Jonathan Hill of the European (b) R.C.M. 104(b)(1)(B) is amended to
and Testimony,’’ June 15, 2007, and do read as follows:
Commission (EC). Under the comparability not constitute the official position of the
determinations, CCPs that are authorized in ‘‘(B) Give a less favorable rating or
the European Union (EU) under the European
Department of Defense, the Military evaluation of any defense counsel or
Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and Departments, or any other Government special victims’ counsel because of the
registered with the CFTC may comply with agency. zeal with which such counsel
certain CFTC requirements for financial FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: represented any client. As used in this
resources, risk management, settlement Major Harlye Carlton, USMC, JSC rule, ‘‘special victims’ counsel’’ are
procedures, and default rules and procedures Executive Secretary, at harlye.carlton@
by complying with corresponding judge advocates who, in accordance
usmc.mil. The JSC public Web site is with 10 U.S.C. 1044e, are designated as
requirements under the EMIR framework.
located at http://jsc.defense.gov. Special Victims’ Counsel by the Judge
Today’s notice also provides for a
streamlined approach for EU CCPs that may SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Advocate General of the armed force in
wish to register with the CFTC in the future. Public Comments: Comments and which the judge advocates are members,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
As I said when it was announced, the materials received from the public are and within the Marine Corps, by the
agreement reached between the EC and the available under Docket ID Number Staff Judge Advocate to the
CFTC avoids unacceptable changes to four DOD–2015–OS–0099, Federal Register Commandant of the Marine Corps.’’
decades of U.S. clearinghouse margin policy Number 2015–26485, and at the
and higher costs of hedging risk for
(c) R.C.M. 305(h)(2)(B)(iii)(a) is
America’s farmers, ranchers, financial amended to read as follows:
1 See, e.g., IOSCO Task Force on Cross-Border
institutions, energy firms and manufacturers. Regulation, Final Report (Sept. 2015) (advocating
‘‘(a) The prisoner will not appear at
Yet, as I have observed, the protracted for an outcomes-based approach as opposed to a trial, pretrial hearing, preliminary
process for reaching this compromise was line-by-line comparison of rules). hearing, or investigation, or’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_15327/page/1.svg)
![15274 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices
(x) A new R.C.M. 907(b)(2)(E) is (ee) R.C.M. 1107(c) is amended to reduction in pay grade, forfeitures of
inserted and reads as follows: read as follows: pay and allowances, fines, reprimands,
‘‘(E) The specification fails to state an ‘‘(c) Action on findings. Action on the restrictions, and hard labor without
offense.’’ findings is not required. However, the confinement.
(y) R.C.M. 912(a)(1)(K) is amended to convening authority may take action (B) Except as provided in
read as follows: subject to the following limitations: subparagraph (d)(1)(C) of this rule, the
‘‘(K) Whether the member has acted as (1) Where a court-martial includes a convening authority may not
accuser, counsel, preliminary hearing finding of guilty for an offense listed in disapprove, commute, or suspend, in
officer, investigating officer, convening subparagraph (c)(1)(A) of this rule, the whole or in part, that portion of an
authority, or legal officer or staff judge convening authority may not take the adjudged sentence that includes:
advocate for the convening authority in actions listed in subparagraph (c)(1)(B) (i) confinement for more than six
the case, or has forwarded the charges of this rule: months; or
with a recommendation as to (A) Offenses (ii) dismissal, dishonorable discharge,
disposition.’’ (i) Article 120(a) or (b), Article 120b, or bad-conduct discharge.
(z) R.C.M. 912(f)(1)(F) is amended to or Article 125; (C) Exceptions
read as follows: (ii) Offenses for which the maximum (i) Trial counsel recommendation.
‘‘(F) Has been an investigating or sentence of confinement that may be Upon the recommendation of the trial
preliminary hearing officer as to any adjudged exceeds two years without counsel, in recognition of the
offense charged;’’ regard to the jurisdictional limits of the substantial assistance by the accused in
(aa) R.C.M. 1002 is amended to read court; or the investigation or prosecution of
as follows: (iii) Offenses where the adjudged another person who has committed an
‘‘(a) Generally. Subject to limitations sentence for the case includes dismissal, offense, the convening authority or
in this Manual, the sentence to be dishonorable discharge, bad-conduct another person authorized to act under
adjudged is a matter within the discharge, or confinement for more than this rule shall have the authority to
discretion of the court-martial; except six months. disapprove, commute, or suspend the
when a mandatory minimum sentence (B) Prohibited actions adjudged sentence, in whole or in part,
is prescribed by the code, a court- (i) Dismiss a charge or specification even with respect to an offense for
martial may adjudge any punishment by setting aside a finding of guilty which a mandatory minimum sentence
authorized in this Manual, including the thereto; or exists.
maximum punishment or any lesser (ii) Change a finding of guilty to a (ii) Pretrial agreement. If a pretrial
punishment, or may adjudge a sentence charge or specification to a finding of agreement has been entered into by the
of no punishment. guilty to an offense that is a lesser convening authority and the accused, as
(b) Unitary Sentencing. Sentencing by included offense of the offense stated in authorized by R.C.M. 705, the
a court-martial is unitary. The court- the charge or specification. convening authority or another person
martial will adjudge a single sentence (2) The convening authority may authorized to act under this rule shall
for all the offenses of which the accused direct a rehearing in accordance with have the authority to approve,
was found guilty. A court-martial may subsection (e) of this rule. disapprove, commute, or suspend a
not impose separate sentences for each (3) For offenses other than those listed sentence, in whole or in part, pursuant
finding of guilty, but may impose only in subparagraph (c)(1)(A) of this rule: to the terms of the pretrial agreement.
a single, unitary sentence covering all of (A) The convening authority may However, if a mandatory minimum
the guilty findings in their entirety.’’ change a finding of guilty to a charge or sentence of a dishonorable discharge
(bb) R.C.M. 1103(b)(2)(B)(i) is specification to a finding of guilty to an applies to an offense for which an
amended to read as follows: offense that is a lesser included offense accused has been convicted, the
‘‘(i) The sentence adjudged includes of the offense stated in the charge or convening authority or another person
confinement for twelve months or more specification; or authorized to act under this rule may
or any punishment that may not be (B) Set aside any finding of guilty and: commute the dishonorable discharge to
adjudged by a special court-martial; or’’ (i) Dismiss the specification and, if a bad-conduct discharge pursuant to the
(cc) The Note currently located appropriate, the charge; or terms of the pretrial agreement.
immediately following the title of (ii) Direct a rehearing in accordance (D) If the convening authority acts to
R.C.M. 1107 and prior to R.C.M. 1107(a) with subsection (e) of this rule. disapprove, commute, or suspend, in
is amended to read as follows: (4) If the convening authority acts to whole or in part, the sentence of the
‘‘[Note: R.C.M. 1107(b)–(f) apply to dismiss or change any charge or court-martial for an offense listed in
offenses committed on or after 24 June specification for an offense, the subparagraph (c)(1)(A) of this rule, the
2014; however, if at least one offense convening authority shall provide, at convening authority shall provide, at
resulting in a finding of guilty in a case the same time, a written explanation of the same time, a written explanation of
occurred prior to 24 June 2014, or the reasons for such action. The written the reasons for such action. The written
includes a date range where the earliest explanation shall be made a part of the explanation shall be made a part of the
date in the range for that offense is record of trial and action thereon.’’ record of trial and action thereon.’’
before 24 June 2014, then the prior (ff) R.C.M. 1107(d) is amended to read (gg) R.C.M. 1107(e) is amended to
version of R.C.M. 1107 applies to all as follows: read as follows:
offenses in the case, except that ‘‘(d) Action on the sentence.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
‘‘(e) Ordering rehearing or other trial.
mandatory minimum sentences under (1) The convening authority shall take (1) Rehearings not permitted. A
Article 56(b) and applicable rules under action on the sentence subject to the rehearing may not be ordered by the
R.C.M. 1107(d)(1)(D)–(E) still apply.]’’ following: convening authority where the adjudged
(dd) R.C.M. 1107(b)(5) is amended to (A) The convening authority may sentence for the case includes a
delete the sentence, ‘‘Nothing in this disapprove, commute, or suspend, in sentence of dismissal, dishonorable
subsection shall prohibit the convening whole or in part, any portion of an discharge, or bad-conduct discharge or
authority from disapproving the adjudged sentence not explicitly confinement for more than six months.
findings of guilty and sentence.’’ prohibited by this rule, to include (2) Rehearings permitted.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_15327/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices 15275
(A) In general. Subject to paragraph martial from that which made the to believe that the probationer violated
(e)(1) and subparagraphs (e)(2)(B) original findings. If the convening a condition of suspension, the hearing
through (e)(2)(E) of this rule, the authority determines a rehearing on officer shall set forth this determination
convening authority may in the sentence is impracticable, the convening in a written memorandum that details
convening authority’s discretion order a authority may approve a sentence of no therein the evidence relied upon and
rehearing. A rehearing may be ordered punishment without conducting a reasons for making the decision. The
as to some or all offenses of which rehearing. hearing officer shall forward the original
findings of guilty were entered and the (D) Additional charges. Additional memorandum or release order to the
sentence, or as to sentence only. charges may be referred for trial together probationer’s commander and forward a
(B) When the convening authority with charges as to which a rehearing has copy to the probationer and the officer
may order a rehearing. The convening been directed. in charge of the confinement facility.’’
authority may order a rehearing: (E) Lesser included offenses. If at a (ll) A new sentence is added to the
(i) When taking action on the court- previous trial the accused was convicted end of R.C.M. 1109(d)(1)(A) and reads as
martial under this rule. Prior to ordering of a lesser included offense, a rehearing follows:
a rehearing on a finding, the convening may be ordered only as to that included ‘‘The purpose of the hearing is for the
authority must disapprove the offense or as to an offense included in hearing officer to determine whether
applicable finding and the sentence and that found. If, however, a rehearing is there is probable cause to believe that
state the reasons for disapproval of said ordered improperly on the original the probationer violated a condition of
finding. Prior to ordering a rehearing on offense charged and the accused is the probationer’s suspension.’’
the sentence, the convening authority convicted of that offense at the (mm) R.C.M. 1109(d)(1)(C) is
must disapprove the sentence. rehearing, the finding as to the lesser amended to read as follows:
(ii) When authorized to do so by included offense of which the accused ‘‘(C) Hearing. The procedure for the
superior competent authority. If the was convicted at the original trial may vacation hearing shall follow that
convening authority finds a rehearing as nevertheless be approved. prescribed in subsection (h) of this
to any offenses impracticable, the (3) ‘‘Other’’ trial. The convening or rule.’’
convening authority may dismiss those higher authority may order an ‘‘other’’ (nn) A new sentence is added to the
specifications and, when appropriate, trial if the original proceedings were end of R.C.M. 1109(d)(1)(D) and reads as
charges. invalid because of lack of jurisdiction or follows:
(iii) Sentence reassessment. If a failure of a specification to state an ‘‘This record shall include the
superior competent authority has offense. The authority ordering an recommendation, the evidence relied
approved some of the findings of guilty ‘‘other’’ trial shall state in the action the upon, and reasons for making the
and has authorized a rehearing as to basis for declaring the proceedings decision.’’
other offenses and the sentence, the invalid.’’ (oo) R.C.M. 1109(d)(2)(A) is amended
convening authority may, unless (hh) The Note currently located to read as follows:
otherwise directed, reassess the immediately following the title of ‘‘(A) In general. The officer exercising
sentence based on the approved R.C.M. 1108(b) and prior to the first general court-martial jurisdiction over
findings of guilty and dismiss the line, ‘‘The convening authority may the probationer shall review the record
remaining charges. Reassessment is . . .’’, is amended to read as follows: produced by and the recommendation
appropriate only where the convening ‘‘[Note: R.C.M. 1108(b) applies to of the officer exercising special court-
authority determines that the accused’s offenses committed on or after 24 June martial jurisdiction over the
sentence would have been at least of a 2014; however, if at least one offense in probationer, decide whether there is
certain magnitude had the prejudicial a case occurred prior to 24 June 2014, probable cause to believe that the
error not been committed and the then the prior version of R.C.M. 1108(b) probationer violated a condition of the
reassessed sentence is appropriate in applies to all offenses in the case.]’’ probationer’s suspension, and, if so,
relation to the affirmed findings of (ii) R.C.M. 1109(a) is amended to read decide whether to vacate the suspended
guilty.’’ as follows: sentence. If the officer exercising
(C) Limitations. ‘‘(a) In general. Suspension of general court-martial jurisdiction
(i) Sentence approved. A rehearing execution of the sentence of a court- decides to vacate the suspended
shall not be ordered if, in the same martial may be vacated for violation of sentence, that officer shall prepare a
action, a sentence is approved. any condition of the suspension as written statement of the evidence relied
(ii) Lack of sufficient evidence. A provided in this rule.’’ on and the reasons for vacating the
rehearing may not be ordered as to (jj) R.C.M. 1109(c)(4)(A) is amended to suspended sentence.’’
findings of guilty when there is a lack read as follows: (pp) A new sentence is added to the
of sufficient evidence in the record to ‘‘(A) Rights of probationer. Before the end of R.C.M. 1109(e)(1) and reads as
support the findings of guilty of the preliminary hearing, the probationer follows:
offense charged or of any lesser shall be notified in writing of:’’ ‘‘The purpose of the hearing is for the
included offense. A rehearing may be (kk) R.C.M. 1109(c)(4)(C) is amended hearing officer to determine whether
ordered, however, if the proof of guilt to read as follows: there is probable cause to believe that
consisted of inadmissible evidence for ‘‘(C) Decision. The hearing officer the probationer violated the conditions
which there is available an admissible shall determine whether there is of the probationer’s suspension.’’
substitute. A rehearing may be ordered probable cause to believe that the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(qq) R.C.M. 1109(e)(3) is amended to
as to any lesser offense included in an probationer violated the conditions of read as follows:
offense of which the accused was found the probationer’s suspension. If the ‘‘(3) Hearing. The procedure for the
guilty, provided there is sufficient hearing officer determines that probable vacation hearing shall follow that
evidence in the record to support the cause is lacking, the hearing officer shall prescribed in subsection (h) of this
lesser included offense. issue a written order directing that the rule.’’
(iii) Rehearing on sentence only. A probationer be released from (rr) A new sentence is added to the
rehearing on sentence only shall not be confinement. If the hearing officer end of R.C.M. 1109(e)(5) and reads as
referred to a different kind of court- determines that there is probable cause follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_15327/page/4.svg)
![15278 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices
(1) ‘‘A child of either’’ means a ‘‘(B) a counsel for the government [communicating to the said lla threat
biological child, adopted child, or ward who intends to offer a certification to ll] [ll], (if) (unless) he/she, the
of one of the spouses and includes a provides written notice of that intent at said ll, would [recommend dismissal
child who is under the permanent or least 14 days before trial, and the of the charges against said ll]
temporary physical custody of one of accused does not object in writing [(wrongfully refuse to testify) (testify
the spouses, regardless of the existence within 7 days of receiving the notice— falsely concerning ll) (ll)] [(at such
of a legal parent-child relationship. For unless the military judge sets a different trial) (before such investigating officer)
purposes of this rule only, a child is: time for the notice or the objection.’’ (before such preliminary hearing
(A) An individual under the age of 18; (m) Mil. R. Evid. 804(b)(1)(B) is officer)] [ll].’’
or amended by replacing ‘‘pretrial (e) Paragraph 108, Testify: Wrongful
(B) an individual with a mental investigation’’ with ‘‘preliminary refusal, subparagraph f. is amended by
handicap who functions under the age hearing.’’ replacing ‘‘officer conducting an
of 18. (n) Mil. R. Evid. 1101(d)(2) is investigation under Article 32, Uniform
(2) ‘‘Temporary physical custody’’ amended by replacing ‘‘pretrial Code of Military Justice’’ with ‘‘officer
means a parent has entrusted his or her investigations’’ with ‘‘preliminary conducting a preliminary hearing under
child with another. There is no hearings.’’ Article 32, Uniform Code of Military
minimum amount of time necessary to Sec. 3. Part IV of the Manual for Justice.’’
establish temporary physical custody, Courts-Martial, United States, is (f) Paragraph 110, Article 134—
nor is a written agreement required. amended as follows: Threat, communicating, subparagraph c.
Rather, the focus is on the parent’s (a) Paragraph 4, Article 80—Attempts, is amended to read as follows:
agreement with another for assuming subparagraph e. is amended to read as ‘‘c. Explanation. For purposes of this
parental responsibility for the child. For follows: paragraph, to establish that the
example, temporary physical custody ‘‘e. Maximum punishment. Any communication was wrongful it is
may include instances where a parent person subject to the code who is found necessary that the accused transmitted
entrusts another with the care of his or guilty of an attempt under Article 80 to the communication for the purpose of
her child for recurring care or during commit any offense punishable by the issuing a threat, with the knowledge
absences due to temporary duty or code shall be subject to the same that the communication would be
deployments. maximum punishment authorized for viewed as a threat, or acted recklessly
(3) As used in this rule, a the commission of the offense with regard to whether the
communication is ‘‘confidential’’ if attempted, except that in no case shall communication would be viewed as a
made privately by any person to the the death penalty be adjudged, and in threat. However, it is not necessary to
spouse of the person and is not intended no case, other than attempted murder, establish that the accused actually
to be disclosed to third persons other shall confinement exceeding 20 years be intended to do the injury threatened.
than those reasonably necessary for adjudged. Except in the cases of Nor is the offense committed by the
transmission of the communication.’’ attempts of Article 120(a) or (b), rape or mere statement of intent to commit an
(g) Mil. R. Evid. 505(e)(2) is amended sexual assault of a child under Article unlawful act not involving injury to
by replacing ‘‘investigating officer’’ with 120b(a) or (b), and forcible sodomy another. See also paragraph 109, Threat
‘‘preliminary hearing officer.’’ under Article 125, mandatory minimum
(h) Mil. R. Evid. 801(d)(1)(B) is or hoax designed or intended to cause
punishment provisions shall not apply.’’ panic or public fear.’’
amended to read as follows: (b) Paragraph 57, Article 131—
‘‘(B) is consistent with the declarant’s Perjury, subparagraph c.(1) is amended Dated: March 17, 2016.
testimony and is offered: by replacing ‘‘an investigation’’ with ‘‘a Aaron Siegel,
(i) to rebut an express or implied preliminary hearing.’’ Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
charge that the declarant recently (c) Paragraph 57, Article 131— Officer, Department of Defense.
fabricated it or acted from a recent Perjury, subparagraph c.(3) is amended [FR Doc. 2016–06393 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am]
improper influence or motive in so by replacing ‘‘investigation’’ with BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
testifying; or ‘‘preliminary hearing.’’
(ii) to rehabilitate the declarant’s (d) Paragraph 96, Article 134—
credibility as a witness when attacked Obstructing justice, subparagraph f. is DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
on another ground; or’’ amended to read as follows:
(i) The first sentence of Mil. R. Evid. ‘‘f. Sample specification. In that Office of the Secretary
803(6)(E) is amended to read as follows: (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on
‘‘(E) the opponent does not show that Manual for Courts-Martial;
board—location) (subject-matter
the source of information or the method Amendments to Appendix 22
jurisdiction data, if required), on or
or circumstance of preparation indicate
about 20, wrongfully (endeavor to) AGENCY: Joint Service Committee on
a lack of trustworthiness.’’
(j) Mil. R. Evid. 803(7)(C) is amended (impede (a trial by court-martial) (an Military Justice (JSC), Department of
to read as follows: investigation) (a preliminary hearing) Defense.
‘‘(C) the opponent does not show that (ll)) [influence the actions of ll, (a ACTION: Publication of Discussion and
the possible source of the information or trial counsel of the court-martial) (a Analysis (Supplementary Materials)
other circumstances indicate a lack of defense counsel of the court-martial) (an accompanying the Manual for Courts-
officer responsible for making a
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
trustworthiness.’’ Martial, United States (2012 ed.) (MCM).
(k) The first sentence of Mil. R. Evid. recommendation concerning disposition
803(8)(B) is amended to read as follows: of charges) (ll)] [(influence) (alter) the SUMMARY: The JSC hereby publishes
‘‘(B) the opponent does not show that testimony of llas a witness before a Supplementary Materials accompanying
the source of information or other (court-martial) (an investigating officer) the MCM as amended by Executive
circumstances indicate a lack of (a preliminary hearing) (ll)] in the Orders 13643, 13669, and 13696. These
trustworthiness.’’ case of llby [(promising) (offering) changes have not been coordinated
(l) Mil. R. Evid. 803(10)(B) is amended (giving) to the said, (the sum of $) within the Department of Defense under
to read as follows: (ll, of a value of about $)] DoD Directive 5500.1, ‘‘Preparation,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:01 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_15327/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:15:43
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:15:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of response to public comments on proposed amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2012 ed.) (MCM). | |
| Contact | Major Harlye Carlton, USMC, JSC Executive Secretary, at [email protected] The JSC public Web site is located at http://jsc.defense.gov. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 15272 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR