81 FR 15742 - Certain Beverage Brewing Capsules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Commission's Final Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337 by Solofill LLC or DongGuan Hai Rui Precision Mould Co., Ltd.; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders to Defaulted Respondents; Termination of the Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 57 (March 24, 2016)

Page Range		15742-15743
FR Document		2016-06654

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337 (``section 337'') by Solofill LLC and DongGuan Hai Rui Precision Mould Co., Ltd., and has issued a limited exclusion order and cease desist orders to the defaulted respondents Eko Brands, LLC, Evermuch Technology Co., Ltd., and Ever Much Company, Ltd. The investigation is terminated.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15742-15743]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06654]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-929]


Certain Beverage Brewing Capsules, Components Thereof, and 
Products Containing the Same; Commission's Final Determination Finding 
No Violation of Section 337 by Solofill LLC or DongGuan Hai Rui 
Precision Mould Co., Ltd.; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and 
Cease and Desist Orders to Defaulted Respondents; Termination of the 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has found no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. Sec.  1337 (``section 337'') by Solofill 
LLC and DongGuan Hai Rui Precision Mould Co., Ltd., and has issued a 
limited exclusion order and cease desist orders to the defaulted 
respondents Eko Brands, LLC, Evermuch Technology Co., Ltd., and Ever 
Much Company, Ltd. The investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on September 9, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Adrian Rivera of 
Whittier, California, and Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc., of 
Santa Fe Springs, California (together, ``ARM''). 79 FR 53445-46. The 
complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended, 19 U.S.C. Sec.  1337, in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain beverage brewing capsules, components 
thereof, and products containing the same that infringe claims 5-8 and 
18-20 of U.S. Patent No. 8,720,320 (``the '320 patent''). Id. at 53445. 
The Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents Solofill 
LLC of Houston, Texas (``Solofill''); DongGuan Hai Rui Precision Mould 
Co., Ltd. of Dong Guan City, China (``DongGuan''); Eko Brands, LLC 
(``Eko Brands''), of Woodinville, Washington; Evermuch Technology Co., 
Ltd. (``Evermuch Technology''), of Hong Kong, China; Ever Much Company 
Ltd. (``Evermuch Company'') of Shenzhen, China; Melitta USA, Inc. 
(``Melitta''), of North Clearwater, Florida; LBP Mfg., Inc. of Cicero, 
Illinois and LBP Packaging (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen, China 
(together, ``LBP''); Spark Innovators Corp. (``Spark''), of Fairfield, 
New Jersey; B. Marlboros International Ltd. (HK) (``B. Marlboros'') of 
Hong Kong, China; and Amazon.com, Inc. (``Amazon'') of Seattle, 
Washington. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also named 
as a party to the investigation. Id.
    The Commission terminated the investigation with respect to 
Melitta, Spark, LBP, and B. Marlboros based on the entry of consent 
orders and terminated the investigation with respect to Amazon based on 
a settlement agreement. Notice (Dec. 18, 2014); Notice (Jan. 13, 2015); 
Notice (Mar. 27, 2015); Notice (Apr. 10, 2015). The Commission also 
found Eko Brands, Evermuch Technology, and Evermuch Company in default 
for failing to respond to the complaint and notice of investigation. 
Notice (May 18, 2015). Accordingly, Solofill and DongGuan (together, 
``Respondents'') are the only respondents actively participating in the 
investigation.
    On September 4, 2015, the ALJ issued his final initial 
determination (``ID'') finding no violation of section 337. The ID 
found that ARM had established every element for finding a violation of 
section 337 except for infringement. The ID found that Respondents were 
not liable for direct infringement because direct infringement required 
the combination of Respondents' products with a third-party single 
serve beverage brewer, and that Respondents were not liable for induced 
or contributory infringement because they did not have pre-suit 
knowledge of the '320 patent. The ID did find that Respondents' 
products directly infringed claims 5-7, 18, and 20 of the '320 patent 
(``the asserted claims'') when combined with a third-party single serve 
coffee brewer, that the asserted claims were not shown invalid by clear 
and convincing evidence, and that ARM satisfied both the technical and 
economic prongs of the domestic industry requirement. The ALJ also 
issued his recommendation on remedy and bonding along with his ID.
    On September 21, 2015, ARM petitioned for review of the ID's 
findings that Respondents were not liable for induced and contributory 
infringement because of a lack of pre-suit knowledge, and Respondents 
petitioned for review of several of the ID's findings. On September 29, 
2015, the parties opposed each other's petitions, and the Commission 
Investigative Attorney (``IA'') opposed both petitions.
    On November 9, 2015, the Commission determined to review the final 
ID in part. Specifically the Commission determined to review the 
following: (1) The ID's findings on the construction, infringement, and 
technical prong of the domestic industry requirement for the limitation 
``a needle-like structure, disposed below the base''; (2) the ID's 
findings on induced and contributory infringement; (3) the ID's 
findings that the asserted claims are not invalid for a lack of written 
description, as anticipated by Beaulieu and the APA, or as obvious; and 
(4) the ID's findings on the economic prong of the domestic industry 
requirement. The Commission determined not to review the remaining 
findings in the ID. The Commission also requested briefing from the 
parties on the issue of pre-suit knowledge, and briefing from the 
parties and the public on the issues of remedy, the public interest, 
and bonding. The Commission

[[Page 15743]]

received initial written submissions from ARM, Respondents, and the IA 
on November 20, 2015, and responsive written submissions from ARM, 
Respondents, and the IA on December 1, 2015. No submissions were 
received from the public.
    Having examined the record of this investigation, including the 
ALJ's final ID, the petitions, responses, and other submissions from 
the parties, the Commission has determined that ARM has not proven a 
violation of section 337 by Solofill and DongGuan. Specifically, the 
Commission has determined to modify the ID's construction of ``a 
needle-like structure, disposed below the base,'' and, under the 
modified construction, affirms under modified reasoning the ID's 
findings on infringement and the technical prong of the domestic 
industry requirement. The Commission has also determined to reverse the 
ID's finding that Respondents are not liable for contributory and 
induced infringement. The Commission has further determined that that 
claims 5 and 6 of the '320 patent are invalid as anticipated by 
Beaulieu and that claims 5-7, 18, and 20 of the '320 patent are invalid 
for a lack of written description (Commissioner Kieff dissenting on 
written description). Additionally, the Commission has determined that 
Respondents have not shown that claims 7, 18, and 20 are invalid as 
anticipated or that claims 5-7, 18, and 20 are invalid as obvious. 
Finally, the Commission has determined to affirm the ID's findings on 
the economic prong. All other findings in the ID that are consistent 
with the Commission's determinations are affirmed.
    The Commission also previously found the statutory requirements of 
section 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. Sec.  1337(g)(1)) and Commission Rule 
210.16(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.16(a)(1)) met with respect to Eko Brands, 
Evermuch Technology, and Evermuch Company, and found these respondents 
in default. See ALJ Order No. 19, unreviewed Notice (May 18, 2015).
    The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief 
in this investigation is: (1) A limited exclusion order prohibiting the 
unlicensed entry of beverage brewing capsules, components thereof, and 
products containing same that are manufactured abroad by or on behalf 
of, or imported by or on behalf of, Eko Brands, Evermuch Technology, or 
Evermuch Company, that infringe one or more of claims 8 and 19 of the 
'320 patent; (2) cease and desist orders prohibiting Eko Brands, 
Evermuch Technology, and Evermuch Company from importing, selling, 
marketing, advertising, distributing, transferring (except for 
exportation), soliciting United States agents or distributors, and 
aiding or abetting other entities in the importation, sale for 
importation, sale after importation, transfer (except for exportation), 
or distribution of beverage brewing capsules, components thereof, and 
products containing same that infringe one or more of claims 8 and 19 
of the '320 patent. The Commission has further determined that the 
public interest factors enumerated in section 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 
Sec.  1337(g)(1)) do not preclude the issuance of the remedial orders. 
Finally, the Commission has determined that the bond during the period 
of Presidential review shall be in the amount of 100 percent of the 
entered value of the imported subject articles of Eko Brands, Evermuch 
Technology, and Evermuch Company. The Commission's orders were 
delivered to the President and the United States Trade Representative 
on the day of their issuance. A Commission Opinion concerning the 
Commission's finding of no violation by Solofill or DongGuan will issue 
shortly.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec.  
1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 17, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-06654 Filed 3-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

15742 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2016 / Notices

River basin. Improvements in the International Trade Commission, 500 E respond to the complaint and notice of
efficiency of water delivery and use will Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, investigation. Notice (May 18, 2015).
result in improved streamflows for fish telephone (202) 205–2000. General Accordingly, Solofill and DongGuan
and wildlife and improve the reliability information concerning the Commission (together, ‘‘Respondents’’) are the only
of water supplies for irrigation. may also be obtained by accessing its respondents actively participating in the
This notice is published in Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). investigation.
accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the The public record for this investigation On September 4, 2015, the ALJ issued
Federal Advisory Committee Act of may be viewed on the Commission’s his final initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
1972 (Pub. L. 92–463, as amended). The electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// finding no violation of section 337. The
certification of renewal is published edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired ID found that ARM had established
below. persons are advised that information on every element for finding a violation of
this matter can be obtained by section 337 except for infringement. The
Certification ID found that Respondents were not
contacting the Commission’s TDD
I hereby certify that Charter renewal terminal on (202) 205–1810. liable for direct infringement because
of the Yakima River Basin Conservation direct infringement required the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Advisory Group is in the public interest combination of Respondents’ products
Commission instituted this investigation
in connection with the performance of with a third-party single serve beverage
on September 9, 2014, based on a
duties imposed on the Department of brewer, and that Respondents were not
complaint filed by Adrian Rivera of
the Interior. liable for induced or contributory
Whittier, California, and Adrian Rivera
infringement because they did not have
Sally Jewell, Maynez Enterprises, Inc., of Santa Fe
pre-suit knowledge of the ’320 patent.
Secretary of the Interior. Springs, California (together, ‘‘ARM’’).
The ID did find that Respondents’
[FR Doc. 2016–06646 Filed 3–23–16; 8:45 am] 79 FR 53445–46. The complaint alleges
products directly infringed claims 5–7,
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
BILLING CODE 4330–90–P 18, and 20 of the ’320 patent (‘‘the
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
asserted claims’’) when combined with
§ 1337, in the importation into the
a third-party single serve coffee brewer,
INTERNATIONAL TRADE United States, the sale for importation,
that the asserted claims were not shown
COMMISSION and the sale within the United States
invalid by clear and convincing
after importation of certain beverage evidence, and that ARM satisfied both
[Investigation No. 337–TA–929] brewing capsules, components thereof, the technical and economic prongs of
and products containing the same that the domestic industry requirement. The
Certain Beverage Brewing Capsules, infringe claims 5–8 and 18–20 of U.S.
Components Thereof, and Products ALJ also issued his recommendation on
Patent No. 8,720,320 (‘‘the ’320 patent’’). remedy and bonding along with his ID.
Containing the Same; Commission’s Id. at 53445. The Commission’s notice
Final Determination Finding No On September 21, 2015, ARM
of investigation named as respondents petitioned for review of the ID’s findings
Violation of Section 337 by Solofill LLC Solofill LLC of Houston, Texas
or DongGuan Hai Rui Precision Mould that Respondents were not liable for
(‘‘Solofill’’); DongGuan Hai Rui induced and contributory infringement
Co., Ltd.; Issuance of a Limited Precision Mould Co., Ltd. of Dong Guan
Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist because of a lack of pre-suit knowledge,
City, China (‘‘DongGuan’’); Eko Brands, and Respondents petitioned for review
Orders to Defaulted Respondents; LLC (‘‘Eko Brands’’), of Woodinville,
Termination of the Investigation of several of the ID’s findings. On
Washington; Evermuch Technology Co., September 29, 2015, the parties opposed
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Ltd. (‘‘Evermuch Technology’’), of Hong each other’s petitions, and the
Commission. Kong, China; Ever Much Company Ltd. Commission Investigative Attorney
ACTION: Notice. (‘‘Evermuch Company’’) of Shenzhen, (‘‘IA’’) opposed both petitions.
China; Melitta USA, Inc. (‘‘Melitta’’), of On November 9, 2015, the
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that North Clearwater, Florida; LBP Mfg., Commission determined to review the
the U.S. International Trade Inc. of Cicero, Illinois and LBP final ID in part. Specifically the
Commission has found no violation of Packaging (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. of Commission determined to review the
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Shenzhen, China (together, ‘‘LBP’’); following: (1) The ID’s findings on the
amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (‘‘section Spark Innovators Corp. (‘‘Spark’’), of construction, infringement, and
337’’) by Solofill LLC and DongGuan Fairfield, New Jersey; B. Marlboros technical prong of the domestic industry
Hai Rui Precision Mould Co., Ltd., and International Ltd. (HK) (‘‘B. Marlboros’’) requirement for the limitation ‘‘a
has issued a limited exclusion order and of Hong Kong, China; and Amazon.com, needle-like structure, disposed below
cease desist orders to the defaulted Inc. (‘‘Amazon’’) of Seattle, Washington. the base’’; (2) the ID’s findings on
respondents Eko Brands, LLC, The Office of Unfair Import induced and contributory infringement;
Evermuch Technology Co., Ltd., and Investigations was also named as a party (3) the ID’s findings that the asserted
Ever Much Company, Ltd. The to the investigation. Id. claims are not invalid for a lack of
investigation is terminated. The Commission terminated the written description, as anticipated by
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: investigation with respect to Melitta, Beaulieu and the APA, or as obvious;
Robert Needham, Office of the General Spark, LBP, and B. Marlboros based on and (4) the ID’s findings on the
Counsel, U.S. International Trade the entry of consent orders and economic prong of the domestic
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Commission, 500 E Street SW., terminated the investigation with industry requirement. The Commission
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) respect to Amazon based on a determined not to review the remaining
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential settlement agreement. Notice (Dec. 18, findings in the ID. The Commission also
documents filed in connection with this 2014); Notice (Jan. 13, 2015); Notice requested briefing from the parties on
investigation are or will be available for (Mar. 27, 2015); Notice (Apr. 10, 2015). the issue of pre-suit knowledge, and
inspection during official business The Commission also found Eko Brands, briefing from the parties and the public
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Evermuch Technology, and Evermuch on the issues of remedy, the public
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Company in default for failing to interest, and bonding. The Commission

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Mar 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2016 / Notices 15743

received initial written submissions selling, marketing, advertising, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
from ARM, Respondents, and the IA on distributing, transferring (except for R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission,
November 20, 2015, and responsive exportation), soliciting United States U.S. International Trade Commission,
written submissions from ARM, agents or distributors, and aiding or 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
Respondents, and the IA on December 1, abetting other entities in the 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The
2015. No submissions were received importation, sale for importation, sale public version of the complaint can be
from the public. after importation, transfer (except for accessed on the Commission’s
Having examined the record of this exportation), or distribution of beverage Electronic Document Information
investigation, including the ALJ’s final brewing capsules, components thereof, System (EDIS) at EDIS,1 and will be
ID, the petitions, responses, and other and products containing same that available for inspection during official
submissions from the parties, the infringe one or more of claims 8 and 19 business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
Commission has determined that ARM of the ’320 patent. The Commission has in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
has not proven a violation of section 337 further determined that the public International Trade Commission, 500 E
by Solofill and DongGuan. Specifically, interest factors enumerated in section Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
the Commission has determined to 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. § 1337(g)(1)) do not telephone (202) 205–2000.
modify the ID’s construction of ‘‘a preclude the issuance of the remedial General information concerning the
needle-like structure, disposed below orders. Finally, the Commission has Commission may also be obtained by
the base,’’ and, under the modified determined that the bond during the accessing its Internet server at United
construction, affirms under modified period of Presidential review shall be in States International Trade Commission
reasoning the ID’s findings on the amount of 100 percent of the entered (USITC) at USITC.2 The public record
infringement and the technical prong of value of the imported subject articles of for this investigation may be viewed on
the domestic industry requirement. The Eko Brands, Evermuch Technology, and the Commission’s Electronic Document
Commission has also determined to Evermuch Company. The Commission’s Information System (EDIS) at EDIS.3
reverse the ID’s finding that orders were delivered to the President Hearing-impaired persons are advised
Respondents are not liable for and the United States Trade that information on this matter can be
contributory and induced infringement. Representative on the day of their obtained by contacting the
The Commission has further determined issuance. A Commission Opinion Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
that that claims 5 and 6 of the ’320 concerning the Commission’s finding of 205–1810.
patent are invalid as anticipated by no violation by Solofill or DongGuan SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Beaulieu and that claims 5–7, 18, and 20 will issue shortly. Commission has received a complaint
of the ’320 patent are invalid for a lack The authority for the Commission’s and a submission pursuant to section
of written description (Commissioner determination is contained in section 210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of
Kieff dissenting on written description). 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Practice and Procedure filed on behalf
Additionally, the Commission has
amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and in Part of Varidesk LLC on March 18, 2016. The
determined that Respondents have not
210 of the Commission’s Rules of complaint alleges violations of section
shown that claims 7, 18, and 20 are
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
invalid as anticipated or that claims 5–
210). 1337) in the importation into the United
7, 18, and 20 are invalid as obvious.
By order of the Commission. States, the sale for importation, and the
Finally, the Commission has determined
to affirm the ID’s findings on the Issued: March 17, 2016. sale within the United States after
economic prong. All other findings in importation of certain height-adjustable
Lisa R. Barton,
the ID that are consistent with the desk platforms and components thereof.
Secretary to the Commission.
Commission’s determinations are The complaint names as respondents
[FR Doc. 2016–06654 Filed 3–23–16; 8:45 am] Nortek, Inc. of Providence, RI; and
affirmed.
The Commission also previously
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Ergotron, Inc. of St. Paul, MN. The
found the statutory requirements of complainant requests that the
section 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. § 1337(g)(1)) Commission issue a limited exclusion
INTERNATIONAL TRADE order and cease and desist orders.
and Commission Rule 210.16(a)(1) (19 COMMISSION
CFR 210.16(a)(1)) met with respect to Proposed respondents, other
Eko Brands, Evermuch Technology, and Notice of Receipt of Complaint; interested parties, and members of the
Evermuch Company, and found these Solicitation of Comments Relating to public are invited to file comments, not
respondents in default. See ALJ Order the Public Interest to exceed five (5) pages in length,
No. 19, unreviewed Notice (May 18, inclusive of attachments, on any public
2015). AGENCY: U.S. International Trade interest issues raised by the complaint
The Commission has determined that Commission. or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments
the appropriate form of relief in this ACTION: Notice. should address whether issuance of the
investigation is: (1) A limited exclusion relief specifically requested by the
order prohibiting the unlicensed entry SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that complainant in this investigation would
of beverage brewing capsules, the U.S. International Trade affect the public health and welfare in
components thereof, and products Commission has received a complaint the United States, competitive
containing same that are manufactured entitled Certain Height-Adjustable Desk conditions in the United States
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

abroad by or on behalf of, or imported Platforms and Components Thereof DN economy, the production of like or
by or on behalf of, Eko Brands, 3127; the Commission is soliciting directly competitive articles in the
Evermuch Technology, or Evermuch comments on any public interest issues
1 Electronic Document Information System
Company, that infringe one or more of raised by the complaint or
(EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.
claims 8 and 19 of the ’320 patent; (2) complainant’s filing under section 2 United States International Trade Commission
cease and desist orders prohibiting Eko 210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of (USITC): http://edis.usitc.gov.
Brands, Evermuch Technology, and Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 3 Electronic Document Information System

Evermuch Company from importing, 210.8(b)). (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Mar 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1

Document Created: 2016-03-24 00:57:59
Document Modified: 2016-03-24 00:57:59

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Contact		Robert Needham, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation		81 FR 15742