81_FR_18889 81 FR 18826 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review

81 FR 18826 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 63 (April 1, 2016)

Page Range18826-18828
FR Document2016-07450

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 63 (Friday, April 1, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18826-18828]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 
(202) 482-4735.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an 
antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended 
investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or 
countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation.
    All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the 
Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from 
the applicable starting date.

Respondent Selection

    In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for 
individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to 
requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends 
to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend 
to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') 
to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the 
initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent 
selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal 
Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in 
commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on 
the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter 
as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and 
respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on 
the record of the review.
    In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit 
individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection 
under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
    In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning 
whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as 
a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) 
require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, 
which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the 
Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent 
selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the 
respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to 
collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping 
proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper 
review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to 
this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that 
company as collapsed with others, the Department

[[Page 18827]]

will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner 
and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, 
the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent 
selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies 
subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation 
to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies 
are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for 
purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report 
volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include 
data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated 
as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed 
with another company or companies in the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing 
that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity 
must be submitted.

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review 
may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of 
the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation 
provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable 
to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect 
to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90-
day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to 
reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after April 
2016, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline 
unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance 
prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. 
Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be 
made on a case-by-case basis.
    The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as 
in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so 
that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the 
Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future.
    Opportunity To Request A Review: Not later than the last day of 
April 2016,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of 
the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with 
anniversary dates in April for the following periods:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a 
weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is 
closed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Period of Review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Antidumping Duty Proceedings
 
Russia: Solid Fertilizer-Grade Ammonium Nitrate, A-       4/1/15-3/31/16
 821-811.............................................
The People's Republic of China:
    Activated Carbon, A-570-904......................     4/1/15-3/31/16
    Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks, A-570-983...........     4/1/15-3/31/16
    Magnesium Metal, A-570-896.......................     4/1/15-3/31/16
    Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings, A-570-875.     4/1/15-3/31/16
    Steel Threaded Rod, A-570-932....................     4/1/15-3/31/16
 
           Countervailing Duty Proceedings
 
The People's Republic of China: Drawn Stainless Steel    1/1/15-12/31/15
 Sinks, C-570-984....................................
 
                Suspension Agreements
 
    None.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as 
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the 
Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and 
countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the 
individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or 
an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for 
which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested 
party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 
must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular 
producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the 
Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer 
if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which 
was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of 
origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must 
state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the 
request is intended to cover.
    Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in 
prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an 
administrative review of that party absent new information as to the 
party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request 
for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it 
requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation 
of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same 
time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to 
determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant 
to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).
    As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non-
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping 
Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department clarified its 
practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on 
imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The 
public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to 
request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping 
findings and orders.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of 
Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), 
the Department clarified its practice with regard to the conditional 
review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in

[[Page 18828]]

administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will 
no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject 
to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be 
under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, 
or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\3\ In administrative 
reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries 
where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an 
individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify 
for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision 
indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. 
However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was 
conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and 
the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of 
that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change 
as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME 
entity).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should 
specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters 
comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names 
of such exporters in their request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when 
there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will 
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the 
initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME 
entity rate.
    All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (``ACCESS'') on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web 
site at http://access.trade.gov.\4\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the 
petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of 
``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing 
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received 
by the last day of April 2016. If the Department does not receive, by 
the last day of April 2016, a request for review of entries covered by 
an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and 
for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to 
assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate 
equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or 
countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, 
or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to 
collect the cash deposit previously ordered.
    For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no 
assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of 
the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review.
    This notice is not required by statute but is published as a 
service to the international trading community.

    Dated: March 11, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2016-07450 Filed 3-31-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

18826 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2016 / Notices The original approval of the Average Hours per Response: 10 351.213, that the Department of performance progress report form was minutes to 577 hours per response. Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct obtained on August 1, 2013, and the Needs and Uses: This information is an administrative review of that current form has an expiration date of required for the United States to comply antidumping or countervailing duty August 31, 2016. The publication of this with its obligations under the Chemical order, finding, or suspended notice allows NTIA to begin the process Weapons Convention (CWC), an investigation. to extend the approval for the standard international arms control treaty. The All deadlines for the submission of three years, with a minor adjustment to Chemical Weapons Convention comments or actions by the Department the wording on the form to more clearly Implementation Act of 1998 and discussed below refer to the number of indicate how recipients are to report Commerce Chemical Weapons calendar days from the applicable each measure. Convention Regulations (CWCR) specify starting date. This request is for an extension the rights, responsibilities and Respondent Selection (revision with change) of a current obligations for submission of information collection. declarations, reports and inspections. In the event the Department limits the Affected Public: State, regional, local, Affected Public: Businesses and other number of respondents for individual and tribal government organizations. for-profit institutions. examination for administrative reviews Frequency: Quarterly. Frequency: On occasion. initiated pursuant to requests made for Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. the orders identified below, the NTIA published a Notice in the This information collection request Department intends to select Federal Register on January 19, 2016, may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow respondents based on U.S. Customs and soliciting comments on this information the instructions to view Department of Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. collection, with a 60-day public Commerce collections currently under imports during the period of review. We comment period. NTIA did not receive review by OMB. intend to release the CBP data under any comments to this Notice. Written comments and Administrative Protective Order This information collection request recommendations for the proposed (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow information collection should be sent within five days of publication of the the instructions to view Department of within 30 days of publication of this initiation notice and to make our Commerce collections currently under notice to OIRA_Submission@ decision regarding respondent selection review by OMB. omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. within 21 days of publication of the Written comments and Dated: March 29, 2016. initiation Federal Register notice. recommendations for the proposed Therefore, we encourage all parties Glenna Mickelson, information collection should be sent interested in commenting on respondent Management Analyst, Office of the Chief selection to submit their APO within 30 days of publication of this Information Officer. notice to OIRA_Submission@ applications on the date of publication [FR Doc. 2016–07380 Filed 3–31–16; 8:45 am] omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. of the initiation notice, or as soon BILLING CODE 3510–33–P thereafter as possible. The Department Dated: March 28, 2016. invites comments regarding the CBP Glenna Mickelson, data and respondent selection within Management Analyst, Office of the Chief DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE five days of placement of the CBP data Information Officer. on the record of the review. International Trade Administration [FR Doc. 2016–07324 Filed 3–31–16; 8:45 am] In the event the Department decides BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P Antidumping or Countervailing Duty it is necessary to limit individual Order, Finding, or Suspended examination of respondents and Investigation; Opportunity To Request conduct respondent selection under DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Administrative Review section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that Bureau of Industry and Security AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, determinations concerning whether International Trade Administration, particular companies should be Submission for OMB Review; Department of Commerce. ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single Comment Request FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: entity for purposes of calculating The Department of Commerce will Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD antidumping duty rates) require a submit to the Office of Management and Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, substantial amount of detailed Budget (OMB) for clearance the Enforcement and Compliance, information and analysis, which often following proposal for collection of International Trade Administration, require follow-up questions and information under the provisions of the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th analysis. Accordingly, the Department Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Street and Constitution Avenue NW., will not conduct collapsing analyses at Chapter 35). Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) the respondent selection phase of this Agency: Bureau of Industry and 482–4735. review and will not collapse companies Security. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: at the respondent selection phase unless Title: Chemical Weapons Convention there has been a determination to Background collapse certain companies in a asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES (CWC) Declaration and Report Handbook and Forms. Each year during the anniversary previous segment of this antidumping Form Number(s): Form 1–1, Form 1– month of the publication of an proceeding (i.e., investigation, 2, Form 1–2A, Form 1–2B, etc. antidumping or countervailing duty administrative review, new shipper OMB Control Number: 0694–0091. order, finding, or suspended review or changed circumstances Type of Request: Regular. investigation, an interested party, as review). For any company subject to this Burden Hours: 14,813 hours. defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff review, if the Department determined, Number of Respondents: 779 Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), or continued to treat, that company as respondents. may request, in accordance with 19 CFR collapsed with others, the Department VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:25 Mar 31, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2016 / Notices 18827 will assume that such companies completed segment of this proceeding not intend to extend the 90-day continue to operate in the same manner where the Department considered deadline unless the requestor and will collapse them for respondent collapsing that entity, complete quantity demonstrates that an extraordinary selection purposes. Otherwise, the and value data for that collapsed entity circumstance prevented it from Department will not collapse companies must be submitted. submitting a timely withdrawal request. for purposes of respondent selection. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Determinations by the Department to Parties are requested to (a) identify Administrative Review extend the 90-day deadline will be which companies subject to review made on a case-by-case basis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a previously were collapsed, and (b) The Department is providing this party that requests a review may provide a citation to the proceeding in notice on its Web site, as well as in its withdraw that request within 90 days of which they were collapsed. Further, if the date of publication of the notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative companies are requested to complete initiation of the requested review. The Review’’ notices, so that interested the Quantity and Value Questionnaire regulation provides that the Department parties will be aware of the manner in for purposes of respondent selection, in may extend this time if it is reasonable which the Department intends to general each company must report to do so. In order to provide parties exercise its discretion in the future. volume and value data separately for additional certainty with respect to Opportunity To Request A Review: itself. Parties should not include data when the Department will exercise its Not later than the last day of April for any other party, even if they believe discretion to extend this 90-day 2016,1 interested parties may request they should be treated as a single entity deadline, interested parties are advised administrative review of the following with that other party. If a company was that, with regard to reviews requested orders, findings, or suspended collapsed with another company or on the basis of anniversary months on investigations, with anniversary dates in companies in the most recently or after April 2016, the Department does April for the following periods: Period of Review Antidumping Duty Proceedings Russia: Solid Fertilizer-Grade Ammonium Nitrate, A–821–811 .................................................................................................... 4/1/15–3/31/16 The People’s Republic of China: Activated Carbon, A–570–904 ............................................................................................................................................... 4/1/15–3/31/16 Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks, A–570–983 .............................................................................................................................. 4/1/15–3/31/16 Magnesium Metal, A–570–896 ............................................................................................................................................... 4/1/15–3/31/16 Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings, A–570–875 ............................................................................................................... 4/1/15–3/31/16 Steel Threaded Rod, A–570–932 ........................................................................................................................................... 4/1/15–3/31/16 Countervailing Duty Proceedings The People’s Republic of China: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks, C–570–984 ............................................................................... 1/1/15–12/31/15 Suspension Agreements None. In accordance with 19 CFR the interested party must state FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- 351.213(b), an interested party as specifically, on an order-by-order basis, Market Economy Antidumping defined by section 771(9) of the Act may which exporter(s) the request is Proceedings: Assessment of request in writing that the Secretary intended to cover. Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 conduct an administrative review. For Note that, for any party the (October 24, 2011) the Department both antidumping and countervailing Department was unable to locate in clarified its practice with respect to the duty reviews, the interested party must prior segments, the Department will not collection of final antidumping duties specify the individual producers or accept a request for an administrative on imports of merchandise where exporters covered by an antidumping review of that party absent new intermediate firms are involved. The finding or an antidumping or information as to the party’s location. public should be aware of this countervailing duty order or suspension Moreover, if the interested party who clarification in determining whether to agreement for which it is requesting a files a request for review is unable to request an administrative review of review. In addition, a domestic locate the producer or exporter for merchandise subject to antidumping interested party or an interested party which it requested the review, the findings and orders.2 described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act interested party must provide an Further, as explained in Antidumping must state why it desires the Secretary explanation of the attempts it made to Proceedings: Announcement of Change to review those particular producers or locate the producer or exporter at the in Department Practice for Respondent exporters. If the interested party intends same time it files its request for review, Selection in Antidumping Duty for the Secretary to review sales of in order for the Secretary to determine Proceedings and Conditional Review of merchandise by an exporter (or a if the interested party’s attempts were the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES producer if that producer also exports reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR merchandise from other suppliers) 351.303(f)(3)(ii). 65963 (November 4, 2013), the which was produced in more than one As explained in Antidumping and Department clarified its practice with country of origin and each country of Countervailing Duty Proceedings: regard to the conditional review of the origin is subject to a separate order, then Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 non-market economy (NME) entity in 1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. when the Department is closed. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:25 Mar 31, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1

18828 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2016 / Notices administrative reviews of antidumping accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE duty orders. The Department will no a copy of each request must be served longer consider the NME entity as an on the petitioner and each exporter or International Trade Administration exporter conditionally subject to producer specified in the request. administrative reviews. Accordingly, The Department will publish in the Antidumping or Countervailing Duty the NME entity will not be under review Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation Order, Finding, or Suspended unless the Department specifically of Administrative Review of Investigation; Advance Notification of receives a request for, or self-initiates, a Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Sunset Reviews review of the NME entity.3 In Order, Finding, or Suspended administrative reviews of antidumping Investigation’’ for requests received by AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, duty orders on merchandise from NME the last day of April 2016. If the International Trade Administration, countries where a review of the NME Department does not receive, by the last Department of Commerce. entity has not been initiated, but where day of April 2016, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for or suspended investigation listed in this Background a separate rate, the Department will notice and for the period identified issue a final decision indicating that the above, the Department will instruct CBP Every five years, pursuant to section company in question is part of the NME to assess antidumping or countervailing 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as entity. However, in that situation, duties on those entries at a rate equal to amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of because no review of the NME entity the cash deposit of (or bond for) Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the was conducted, the NME entity’s entries estimated antidumping or International Trade Commission were not subject to the review and the countervailing duties required on those automatically initiate and conduct a rate for the NME entity is not subject to entries at the time of entry, or review to determine whether revocation change as a result of that review withdrawal from warehouse, for of a countervailing or antidumping duty (although the rate for the individual consumption and to continue to collect order or termination of an investigation exporter may change as a function of the the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of suspended under section 704 or 734 of finding that the exporter is part of the the Act would be likely to lead to NME entity). any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties continuation or recurrence of dumping Following initiation of an or a countervailable subsidy (as the case antidumping administrative review on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, may be) and of material injury. when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will for consumption during the relevant Upcoming Sunset Reviews for May instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 2016 exporters not named in the initiation the order, if such a gap period is notice, including those that were applicable to the period of review. The following Sunset Reviews are This notice is not required by statute scheduled for initiation in May 2016 suspended at the NME entity rate. but is published as a service to the and will appear in that month’s Notice All requests must be filed international trading community. of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review electronically in Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Dated: March 11, 2016. (‘‘Sunset Review’’). Countervailing Duty Centralized Christian Marsh, Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’) Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping on Enforcement and Compliance’s and Countervailing Duty Operations. ACCESS Web site at http:// [FR Doc. 2016–07450 Filed 3–31–16; 8:45 am] access.trade.gov.4 Further, in BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Department contact Antidumping Duty Proceedings Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Russia (A–821–809) (3rd Review) ........................... Jacqueline Arrowsmith (202) 482– 5255. Countervailing Duty Proceedings No Sunset Review of countervailing duty orders is scheduled for initiation in May 2016 ........................... Suspended Investigations No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in May 2016 ............................ The Department’s procedures for the Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the contact the Department in writing conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth Department will maintain and make within 10 days of the publication of the in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of available a service list for these Notice of Initiation. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) proceedings. To facilitate the timely Please note that if the Department Reviews provides further information preparation of the service list(s), it is receives a Notice of Intent to Participate regarding what is required of all parties requested that those seeking recognition from a member of the domestic industry to participate in Sunset Reviews. as interested parties to a proceeding within 15 days of the date of initiation, 3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties the extent possible, include the names of such 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty should specify that they are requesting a review of exporters in their request. Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:25 Mar 31, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1


Document Created: 2016-04-06 00:07:50
Document Modified: 2016-04-06 00:07:50
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ContactBrenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735.
FR Citation81 FR 18826 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR