81 FR 1884 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arkansas; Crittenden County Base Year Emission Inventory
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 9 (January 14, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 9 (January 14, 2016)
| Page Range | 1884-1887 | |
| FR Document | 2016-00559 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 1884-1887] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-00559] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0647; FRL-9941-21-Region 6] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arkansas; Crittenden County Base Year Emission Inventory AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to the Arkansas State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) emissions inventory (EI) requirement for the Crittenden County ozone nonattainment area. EPA is approving the SIP revision because it [[Page 1885]] satisfies the CAA EI requirement for Crittenden County under the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The inventory includes emissions data for Nitrogen Oxides (NOX ) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). EPA is approving the revisions pursuant to section 110 and part D of the CAA and EPA's regulations. DATES: This rule is effective on March 14, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives relevant adverse comment by March 14, 2016. If the EPA receives such comment, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR- 2015-0647, at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to Schwartz.Colin@epa.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact Mr. Colin Schwartz, 214- 665-7262, Schwartz.Colin@epa.gov. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Colin Schwartz, 214-665-7262, Schwartz.Colin@epa.gov. To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Schwartz or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665- 7253. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' means the EPA. I. Background A. The 2008 Ozone NAAQS and Emissions Inventory Requirement On March 12, 2008, the EPA revised the eight-hour ozone NAAQS from 0.08 parts per million (ppm) to 0.075 ppm. (73 FR 16436, March 27, 2008). The EPA designated Crittenden County as a nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (77 FR 30088, May 21, 2012).\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ On October 1, 2015, the EPA strengthened the ozone standard to 0.070 ppm (80 FR 65292, October 26, 2015). The EPA has not made designations under this new standard and the emission inventory under evaluation in this rulemaking does not address that standard. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAA sections 172(c)(3) and 182(a)(1) require states to develop and submit as a SIP revision an emissions inventory for all areas designated as nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS. 42 U.S.C. 172(c) and 182(a). An emissions inventory is an estimation of actual emissions of air pollutants in an area. Ground-level ozone, O3 , is a gas that is formed by the reaction of VOCs and NOX in the atmosphere in the presence of sunlight. These precursor emissions are emitted by many types of pollution sources, including power plants and industrial emissions sources, on-road and non-road motor vehicles and engines, and smaller sources, collectively referred to as area sources. The EIs provide data for a variety of air quality planning tasks including establishing baseline emission levels, calculating federally required emission reduction targets, emission inputs into air quality simulation models, and tracking emissions over time. The total EI of VOC and NOX for an area are summarized from the estimates developed for four general categories of emissions sources: Point, area, mobile, and biogenic. The EPA's 2008 ozone standard SIP requirements rule recommends that states use 2011 as a base year to address EI requirements (80 FR 12264, 34190, March 6, 2015). B. Arkansas' Submittal On August 28, 2015, Arkansas submitted to the EPA the SIP revision addressing the emissions inventory requirement for Crittenden County under the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The inventory includes estimates of 2011 NOX and VOC emissions in tons per year. The 2011 Base Year Inventory is the starting point for calculating the reductions necessary to meet the requirements of the CAA. Sections 172 (c)(3) and 182(b)(1) of the CAA require that nonattainment plan provisions include an inventory of actual emissions from all sources of relevant pollutants in the nonattainment area. The inventory includes all area, point, non-road mobile, and on-road mobile source emissions in the Crittenden County ozone nonattainment area. The inventory also includes a description of the methods used to estimate emissions. A copy of the submittal is available in the electronic docket for this action. C. What criteria must be met for the EPA to approve this SIP revision? Section 182(a)(1) of the CAA requires states with nonattainment areas to submit a comprehensive and accurate inventory of ozone precursor emissions from all sources within two years of the effective date of designation, which was July 20, 2012. Also, Section 172(c)(3) requires that such an inventory shall include a comprehensive accurate, current inventory of actual emissions from all sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in such area, including such periodic revisions as the Administrator may determine necessary to assure that the requirements of this part are met. II. The EPA's Evaluation EPA reviewed the revision for consistency with the requirements of EPA regulations. A summary of EPA's analysis is provided below. For a full discussion of our evaluation, please see our Technical Support Document (TSD). Sections 172(c)(3) and 182(a)(1) of the CAA require an inventory of actual emissions from all sources of relevant pollutants in the nonattainment area. The 2011 base year emission inventory data include all point, area, and non-road and on-road mobile sources in Crittenden County. Point source emissions were entered through the State and Local Emissions Inventory System (SLEIS) and area sources were developed in accordance with the federal Air Emissions Reporting Requirements (AERR) rule. Non-road mobile sources utilized the National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) while the on-road sources used the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES2010b). The EPA has determined that the inventory was developed in accordance with CAA guidelines and that the revised 2011 base year emission inventory is approvable. The submittal meets the goal of reaching attainment by reducing O3 forming precursors. Table 1 lists the emissions inventory for the Crittenden County area. For more detail on how the [[Page 1886]] emissions inventories were estimated and evaluated, see the TSD. Table 1--Base Year Emissions Inventory, 2011 Data -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ozone season Ozone season Ozone season Category daily NOX Annual NOX daily VOC Annual VOC daily CO Annual CO Units Tons/day Tons/year Tons/day Tons/year Tons/day Tons/year -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Point................................................... 0.0017 .063 .051 186.84 0.004 1.58 Area.................................................... 8.70 3,165.17 24.90 8,868.94 20.32 7,375.56 Non-road Mobile......................................... 2.11 582.63 3.66 881.35 13.78 3,476.63 On-road Mobile.......................................... 6.80 2,542 2.42 845 23.13 9,051 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total............................................... 17.61 6,290.43 31.49 10,782.13 57.234 19,904.77 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Final Action We are approving revisions to the Arkansas SIP that pertain to the 2008 ozone SIP emissions inventory for Crittenden County, as are listed in Table 1. The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view this as a non-controversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if relevant adverse comments are received. This rule will be effective on March 14, 2016 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse comment by February 16, 2016. If we receive relevant adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so now. Please note that if we receive relevant adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 14, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) Samuel Coleman was designated the Acting Regional Administrator on December 30, 2015 through the order of succession outlined in Regional Order R6-1110.1, a copy of which is included in the docket for this action. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by [[Page 1887]] reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile Organic Compounds. Dated: December 30, 2015. Samuel Coleman, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart E--Arkansas 0 2. In Sec. 52.170(e), the third table titled ``EPA-Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures'' is amended by adding an entry for ``Crittenden County Base Year Emission Inventory for the 2008 Ozone Standard'' to the end of the table. The addition reads as follows: Sec. 52.170 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * EPA-Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Arkansas SIP ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicable State geographic or submittal/ Name of SIP provision nonattainment effective EPA approval date Explanation area date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Crittenden County Base Year Crittenden County 8/28/2015 1/13/2016 [Insert ............................ Emission Inventory for the Federal Register 2008 Ozone Standard. citation]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2016-00559 Filed 1-13-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![1884 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not shall not postpone the effectiveness of
Reviews apply to this action. such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
Additional information about these G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
enforce its requirements (see section
statutes and Executive Orders can be Children From Environmental Health
307(b)(2)).
found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws- Risks and Safety Risks
regulations/laws-and-executive-orders. The EPA interprets Executive Order List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 13045 as applying only to those Environmental protection, Air
Planning and Review and Executive regulatory actions that concern pollution control, Incorporation by
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and environmental health or safety risks that reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Regulatory Review the EPA has reason to believe may Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
disproportionately affect children, per matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
This action is not a significant the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile
regulatory action and was therefore not action’’ in section 2–202 of the organic compounds.
submitted to the Office of Management Executive Order. This action is not
and Budget (OMB) for review. Dated: December 24, 2015.
subject to Executive Order 13045 Alexis Strauss,
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) because it does not impose additional
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
requirements beyond those imposed by
This action does not impose an
state law. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
information collection burden under the
of Federal Regulations is amended as
PRA because this action does not H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
follows:
impose additional requirements beyond Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
those imposed by state law. Distribution, or Use PART 52—APPROVAL AND
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) This action is not subject to Executive PROMULGATION OF
Order 13211, because it is not a IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
I certify that this action will not have significant regulatory action under
a significant economic impact on a Executive Order 12866. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
substantial number of small entities continues to read as follows:
under the RFA. This action will not I. National Technology Transfer and
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
impose any requirements on small Advancement Act (NTTAA)
entities beyond those imposed by state Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs Subpart DD—Nevada
law. the EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities § 52.1470 [Amended]
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) unless to do so would be inconsistent ■ 2. In § 52.1470 in paragraph (c), Table
with applicable law or otherwise 3 is amended by removing the entries
This action does not contain any impractical. The EPA believes that this for ‘‘Section 29,’’ ‘‘Section 30:
unfunded mandate as described in action is not subject to the requirements Subsections 30.1–30.7 (excluding
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because subsection 30.4),’’ ‘‘Section 30
not significantly or uniquely affect small application of those requirements would (Incinerators): Subsection 30.4,’’ and
governments. This action does not be inconsistent with the CAA. ‘‘Section 30 (Incinerators): Subsection
impose additional requirements beyond 30.8.’’
those imposed by state law. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental [FR Doc. 2016–00340 Filed 1–13–16; 8:45 am]
Accordingly, no additional costs to
state, local, or tribal governments, or to Justice in Minority Populations and BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
the private sector, will result from this Low-Income Population
action. The EPA lacks the discretionary ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism authority to address environmental AGENCY
justice in this rulemaking.
This action does not have federalism 40 CFR Part 52
implications. It will not have substantial K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
direct effects on the states, on the This action is subject to the CRA, and [EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0647; FRL–9941–21–
relationship between the national the EPA will submit a rule report to Region 6]
government and the states, or on the each House of the Congress and to the Approval and Promulgation of
distribution of power and Comptroller General of the United Implementation Plans; Arkansas;
responsibilities among the various States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ Crittenden County Base Year Emission
levels of government. as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Inventory
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination L. Petitions for Judicial Review
With Indian Tribal Governments AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Agency (EPA).
This action does not have tribal Air Act, petitions for judicial review of ACTION: Direct final rule.
implications, as specified in Executive this action must be filed in the United
Order 13175, because the SIP is not States Court of Appeals for the SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
approved to apply on any Indian appropriate circuit by March 14, 2016. Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to
reservation land or in any other area Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Arkansas State Implementation Plan
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has the Administrator of this final rule does (SIP) submitted to meet the Clean Air
demonstrated that a tribe has not affect the finality of this rule for the Act (CAA) emissions inventory (EI)
jurisdiction, and will not impose purposes of judicial review nor does it requirement for the Crittenden County
substantial direct costs on tribal extend the time within which a petition ozone nonattainment area. EPA is
governments or preempt tribal law. for judicial review may be filed, and approving the SIP revision because it
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Jan 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM 14JAR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_1893/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 1887
reference, Ozone, Reporting and PART 52—APPROVAL AND Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile PROMULGATION OF Measures’’ is amended by adding an
Organic Compounds. IMPLEMENTATION PLANS entry for ‘‘Crittenden County Base Year
Dated: December 30, 2015. Emission Inventory for the 2008 Ozone
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 Standard’’ to the end of the table.
Samuel Coleman, continues to read as follows:
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. The addition reads as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
§ 52.170 Identification of plan.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: Subpart E—Arkansas
* * * * *
■ 2. In § 52.170(e), the third table titled (e) * * *
‘‘EPA-Approved Nonregulatory
EPA-APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE ARKANSAS SIP
State
Applicable geographic or submittal/
Name of SIP provision EPA approval date Explanation
nonattainment area effective
date
* * * * * * *
Crittenden County Base Year Emission Inventory Crittenden County .......... 8/28/2015 1/13/2016 [Insert Fed-
for the 2008 Ozone Standard. eral Register citation].
[FR Doc. 2016–00559 Filed 1–13–16; 8:45 am] submission and to formalize that the information about CBI or multimedia
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P MVEB is approved, and when submissions, and general guidance on
considered with the emissions from all making effective comments, please visit
sources, demonstrates progress toward http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION attainment from the 2008 base year commenting-epa-dockets.
AGENCY through a 2015 target year. EPA found FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
these MVEBs adequate for Steven Brown, Environmental
40 CFR Part 52 transportation conformity purposes in Protection Agency, Air Planning and
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0587; FRL 9941–01– an earlier action on March 5, 2014. Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Region 7] Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective March 14, 2016, without 913–551–7718 or by email at
Approval of Missouri’s Air Quality brown.steven@epa.gov.
Implementation Plans; Early Progress further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by February 16, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Plan of the St. Louis Nonattainment
If EPA receives adverse comment, we Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
Area for the 2008 Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard will publish a timely withdrawal of the or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
direct final rule in the Federal Register provides additional information by
AGENCY: Environmental Protection informing the public that the rule will addressing the following:
Agency (EPA). not take effect. I. What is the background for this action?
ACTION: Direct final rule. II. What are the criteria for early progress
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
plans?
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the request?
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final OAR–2015–0587, to http:// IV. What are the MVEB’s for the St. Louis
action to approve revisions to the State www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 8-hour ozone area?
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by instructions for submitting comments. V. What action is EPA taking?
the State of Missouri consisting of the Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. I. What is the background for this
Early Progress Plan and motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for volatile EPA may publish any comment received action?
organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides to its public docket. Do not submit EPA’s final rule designating
of nitrogen (NOX) for the St. Louis electronically any information you nonattainment areas and associated
Nonattainment area under the 2008 consider to be Confidential Business classifications for the 2008 ozone
8-hour National Ambient Air Quality Information (CBI) or other information National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Standard (NAAQS). On August 26, whose disclosure is restricted by statute. (NAAQS) was published in the Federal
2013, EPA received from the Missouri Multimedia submissions (audio, video, Register on May 21, 2012 (77 FR 30088).
Department of Natural Resources etc.) must be accompanied by a written The St. Louis area was designated as
(MDNR) an Early Progress Plan for the comment. The written comment is marginal nonattainment. The St. Louis
St. Louis area showing progress toward considered the official comment and ozone area had previously been
attainment under the 2008 Ozone should include discussion of all points designated nonattainment for the 1-hour
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
NAAQS. This submittal was developed you wish to make. EPA will generally ozone standard and had 1-hour motor
to establish MVEBs for the St. Louis not consider comments or comment vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for
8-hour ozone nonattainment area. This contents located outside of the primary NOX and VOC established in the St.
approval of the Early Progress Plan for submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or Louis 1-hour maintenance plan SIP (66
the St. Louis 8-hour ozone other file sharing system). For FR 33996). The 1-hour MVEBs were the
nonattainment area fulfills EPA’s additional submission methods, the full only approved MVEBs for St. Louis and
requirement to act on the MDNR SIP EPA public comment policy, were based on EPA’s MOBILE6.2
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Jan 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM 14JAR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_1893/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-01-14 02:50:42
Document Modified: 2016-01-14 02:50:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on March 14, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives relevant adverse comment by March 14, 2016. If the EPA receives such comment, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Mr. Colin Schwartz, 214-665-7262, [email protected] To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Schwartz or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665- 7253. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 1884 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR