81_FR_19770 81 FR 19705 - FY 2016 Railroad Safety Technology Grant Funds

81 FR 19705 - FY 2016 Railroad Safety Technology Grant Funds

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 65 (April 5, 2016)

Page Range19705-19709
FR Document2016-07780

This notice details the application requirements and procedures for obtaining funding for eligible Railroad Safety Technology Grant projects. The opportunities described in this notice are available under Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number 20.321, ``Railroad Safety Technology.''

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19705-19709]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07780]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


FY 2016 Railroad Safety Technology Grant Funds

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice details the application requirements and 
procedures for obtaining funding for eligible Railroad Safety 
Technology Grant projects. The opportunities described in this notice 
are available under Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number 
20.321, ``Railroad Safety Technology.''

DATES: Applications for funding under this solicitation are due no 
later than 5:00 p.m. DST May 20, 2016. Applications for funding 
received after 5:00 p.m. DST on May 20, 2016 will not be considered. 
See Section 4 of this notice for additional information regarding the 
application process.

ADDRESSES: Applications must be submitted via Grants.gov. For any 
required or supporting application materials that an applicant is 
unable to submit via Grants.gov (such as oversized engineering 
drawings), an applicant may submit an original and two (2) copies to 
Mr. Marvin Winston, Office of Program Delivery, Federal Railroad 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W36-440, Washington, 
DC 20590; Email: [email protected]. However, due to delays caused 
by enhanced screening of mail delivered via the U.S. Postal Service, 
applicants are advised to use other means of conveyance (such as 
courier service) to assure timely receipt of materials.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have a project related 
question, you may contact Dr. Mark Hartong, Scientific and Technical 
Advisor (Phone: (202) 493-1332; email: [email protected]), or Mr. 
Devin Rouse, Program Manager (Phone: (202) 493-6185, email: 
[email protected]). Grant application submission and processing 
questions should be addressed to Mr. Marvin Winston, Office of Program 
Delivery, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Room W36-440, Washington, DC 20590; Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Notice to applicants: FRA recommends applicants read this notice in 
its entirety prior to preparing application materials. There are 
several administrative prerequisites described herein that applicants 
must comply with in order to submit an application, as well as specific 
eligibility requirements that must be met. Additionally, applicants 
should note that the required Project Narrative component of the 
application package may not exceed 25 pages in length (including any 
appendices).

Table of Contents

1. Funding Opportunity Description
2. Award Information
3. Eligibility and Review Criteria
4. Application and Submission Information
5. Award Administration Information
6. Agency Contact

Section 1: Funding Opportunity Description

    The purpose of this notice is to solicit applications for grants 
for eligible railroad safety technology projects. Congress appropriated 
the funding available under this NOFO, $25 million, in the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2016, Division L, Title I (Pub. L. 114-113 
(December 18, 2015)), to carry out railroad safety technology grants as 
set forth in 49 U.S.C. 20158. To maximize the benefits of the funding 
available, FRA is limiting the eligible projects to those that 
implement a Positive Train Control (PTC) system or, as described in 
Section 3, will otherwise benefit overall PTC system implementation on 
freight, intercity passenger, and commuter railroads.

Section 2: Award Information

    FRA anticipates making multiple awards from the funding made 
available in this notice and is not predetermining any minimum or 
maximum dollar amounts for awards. However, given the limited amount of 
funding currently available, applicants are encouraged to

[[Page 19706]]

limit their Federal funding requests to a maximum of $3,000,000 per 
application. While this $3,000,000 application limit is a 
recommendation and not a firm requirement, applicants exceeding this 
$3,000,000 threshold must explain why any requested funding over 
$3,000,000 is necessary to implement the proposed project. 
Collaborative applicants submitting a project that will benefit more 
than five (5) entities (e.g., one entity implementing back office 
systems for multiple (five or more) railroads) may request up to the 
authorized appropriation limit of $25,000,000. Additionally, FRA may 
choose to award a grant for less than the amount requested in the 
application. FRA will make awards for projects selected under this 
notice as grants with an 80% federal/20% non-federal cost share. The 
funding provided under these grants will be made available to grantees 
on a reimbursable basis.
    Applications will proceed through a three-part review process:
    1. Screening for completeness and eligibility;
    2. Evaluation of eligible applications by technical panels applying 
the evaluation criteria; and
    3. Project selection by the FRA Administrator applying additional 
selection criteria.
    Each application will first be screened for eligibility 
(requirements outlined in Section 3 of this notice) and completeness 
(containing all required documentation outlined in Section 4 of this 
notice).
    A technical panel consisting of subject-matter experts will 
evaluate eligible and complete applications using the evaluation 
criteria outlined in Section 3 of this notice. FRA will award funds to 
projects that are well-aligned with one or more of the evaluation and 
selection criteria. In addition, FRA will consider whether a project 
has a negative effect on any of the evaluation and selection criteria, 
and any such negative effect may reduce the likelihood that it will 
select the project for award.

Section 3: Eligibility and Review Criteria

    The following entities are eligible applicants for PTC 
implementation projects:
     Passenger and freight railroad carriers;
     Railroad suppliers; and
     State and local governments for projects that have a 
public benefit of improved safety and network efficiency.
    To be eligible for assistance, the above entities subject to 49 
U.S.C. 20157(a) must have submitted a revised Positive Train Control 
Implementation Plan (PTCIP) to FRA as required by 49 U.S.C. 20157(a). 
FRA considers the development and submission of a revised PTCIP under 
49 U.S.C. 20157(a) to meet the eligibility requirement related to 
submitting a plan required under 49 U.S.C. 20156(e)(2) containing an 
analysis of the impact, feasibility, costs and benefits of implementing 
PTC system technology. FRA believes that any submission connected to 
sec. 20156(e)(2), which has yet to be incorporated into a Federal 
regulation, would merely be duplicative of what a railroad analyzed 
when it developed and submitted a revised PTCIP. Thus, FRA considers 
the submission of a revised PTCIP to meet the eligibility requirements 
in 49 U.S.C. 20158(b)(3) for purposes of this NOFO. If an applicant is 
not required to comply with either sec. 20157(a) or sec. 20156(e)(2), 
the applicant must demonstrate that to FRA's satisfaction in its NOFO 
application.
    The FRA is soliciting applications for projects that will benefit 
overall PTC system implementation on freight, intercity passenger, and 
commuter railroads. Under 49 U.S.C. 20158(b)(2), the FRA shall give 
priority to projects that (A) focus on making technologies 
interoperable between railroad systems, such as train control 
technologies; (B) accelerate train control technology deployment on 
high-risk corridors, such as those that have high volumes of hazardous 
materials shipments or over which commuter or passenger trains operate; 
or (C) benefit both passenger and freight safety and efficiency. Given 
that the amount of funding available is not likely sufficient to cover 
the costs necessary to deploy PTC on any given railroad, FRA will 
further prioritize projects that not only fall within these areas but 
also involve:
    1. An entity or entities that have submitted a revised PTCIP and 
demonstrated progress in implementing PTC in accordance with its PTCIP 
and have shown good faith in attempting to timely complete PTC 
implementation;
    2. Collaboration between freight and passenger railroad carriers, 
railroad suppliers, and State and local governments, particularly 
related to interoperability and other industry-wide PTC technical and 
management issues;
    3. The development and deployment of technologies that will lower 
costs, accelerate implementation, increase interoperability between 
host and tenant operations, and improve reliability of PTC systems; and
    4. The development and deployment of technologies that will 
eliminate PTC communications interference, provide solutions to 
configuration management of multi-railroad PTC software and firmware 
deployments, eliminate PTC communications interference; provide 
configuration management of multi-railroad PTC software and firmware 
deployments; and provide host-tenant railroad PTC interoperability/
system certification.
    Examples of eligible projects include the following:
     Costs for implementation, installation, and testing of PTC 
systems;
     Costs for shared PTC infrastructure (e.g., back office 
systems, CAD systems); and
     Costs to advance PTC interoperability, such as pilot 
programs, standardization committees, development of standard 
processes, and spectrum acquisition, sharing, and desensitization.

Applicants should note that these aspects represent suggested areas of 
interest by the FRA, and any otherwise eligible applications meeting 
the criteria above will be evaluated and considered for award.
    By statute, 49 U.S.C. 20158 allows for up to an 80 percent Federal 
share of project costs. The required 20 percent non-Federal match may 
be comprised of public sector (state or local) or private sector 
funding. However, the FRA cannot consider any other Federal funds, nor 
any non-Federal funds already expended (or otherwise encumbered), 
towards the matching requirement. Additionally, FRA is limiting the 
method for calculating the non-Federal match to cash contributions 
only--``in-kind'' contributions will not be accepted. Matching funds 
provided in excess of the minimum requirement will be considered in 
evaluating the merit of an application.
    FRA intends to award funds to PTC projects that achieve the maximum 
public benefits possible. Analysis provided by applicants that 
quantifies the monetary value (whenever possible) of the anticipated 
public benefits of the proposed project will be particularly relevant 
to the FRA in evaluating applications. The systematic process of 
comparing expected benefits and costs helps decision-makers organize 
information about, and evaluate tradeoffs between, alternative 
transportation investments. FRA will consider benefits and costs using 
standard data and qualitative information provided by applicants and 
will evaluate applications in a manner consistent with Executive Order 
12893 (Principles for Federal Infrastructure Investments, 59 FR 4233), 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

[[Page 19707]]

Circular A-94 (Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis 
of Federal Programs), and OMB Circular A-4 (Regulatory Analysis). 
Applications for PTC projects will be reviewed by DOT subject matter 
experts against the following three evaluation criteria:
     PTC Deployment Benefits;
     Technical Merit; and
     Project Development approach.

PTC Deployment Benefits

    The following factors will be considered in assessing a proposed 
project's achievement of PTC deployment benefits:
     The degree to which the successful implementation of the 
proposed project would advance the technical deployment of PTC, 
including improvements to reliability, safety, security, and 
maintainability;
     The degree to which the successful implementation of the 
proposed project would decrease PTC implementation and maintenance 
costs; and
     The degree to which the project maximizes the return on 
investment (ROI) towards industry-wide implementation efforts.

Technical Merit

    The following factors will be considered in assessing a proposed 
project's technical merit:
     The degree to which the proposed project exhibits a sound 
scientific and engineering basis;
     The degree to which the proposed project could be 
practically applied in and compatible with the railroad's operating 
environment and infrastructure; and
     The perceived likelihood of technical and practical 
success.

Project Development Approach

    The following factors will be considered in assessing the proposed 
project's planning and development to date:
     The technical qualifications and demonstrated experience 
of key personnel proposed to lead and perform the technical efforts, 
and qualifications of primary and supporting organizations to fully and 
successfully execute the proposal plan within the proposed timeframe 
and budget;
     The degree to which proposed effort is supported by 
multiple entities (letters of support are encouraged);
     The affordability and degree to which the proposed effort 
appears to be a good value for the amount of funding requested. Good 
value is defined as believing or concluding that the goods/services 
received were worth the price paid. Examples of the types of factors 
that may be considered include, but are not limited to, suitability, 
quality, skills, price, and life-cycle cost. The mix of these and other 
factors and the relevant importance of each will vary on a case by case 
basis;
     The reasonableness and realism of the proposed costs;
     The extent of proposed cost sharing or cost participation 
under the proposed effort (exclusive of the applicant's prior 
investment); and
     Preference will be given to projects that can demonstrate 
an ability to substantially complete work, or otherwise provide 
benefits to industry, prior to December 31, 2018.
    All evaluation criteria, when combined, are significantly more 
important than cost or price alone. While cost or price will be a 
factor that is considered, technical merit is appreciably more 
important and, as such, greater consideration will be given to 
technical excellence. An offer must be found acceptable under all 
applicable evaluation factors to be considered eligible for award.

Selection Criteria

    In addition to the evaluation criteria outlined above, the FRA 
Administrator will apply the following selection criteria to further 
ensure that the projects selected for funding advance FRA's current 
mission and key priorities:
    Alignment with the DOT Strategic Goals and Priorities
     Improving transportation safety;
     Maintaining transportation infrastructure in a state of 
good repair;
     Promoting economic competitiveness;
     Advancing environmentally sustainable transportation 
policies;
     Enhancing quality of life; and
     Building ladders of opportunity to expand the middle 
class.
    Proposed projects that demonstrate the ability to provide reliable, 
safe and affordable transportation choices to connect economically 
disadvantaged populations, non-drivers, senior citizens, and persons 
with disabilities in disconnected communities with employment, training 
and education will receive particular consideration during project 
selection.

Project Delivery Performance

     The applicant's track record in successfully delivering 
previous FRA and DOT grants on time, on budget, and for the full 
intended scope;
     The applicant's means for achieving satisfactory 
continuing control over project assets in a timely manner, including 
public ownership of project assets or agreements with railroad 
operators and infrastructure owners at the time of application; and
     The extent to which the proposed project complements 
previous FRA or DOT awards.

Region/Location

     The extent to which the proposed project increases the 
economic productivity of land, capital, or labor at specific locations, 
particularly in economically distressed areas;
     Ensuring appropriate level of regional balance across the 
country;
     Ensuring consistency with national transportation and rail 
network objectives; and
     Ensuring integration with other rail services and 
transportation modes.

Innovation/Resource Development

     Pursuing new rail technologies that result in favorable 
public return on investment and ensure delivery of project benefits; 
and
     Promoting innovations that demonstrate the value of new 
approaches to, among other things, transportation funding and finance, 
contracting, project delivery, congestion management, safety 
management, asset management, or long-term operations and maintenance.

Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) 
Review

    Before making a Federal award with a total amount of Federal share 
greater than the simplified acquisition threshold (see 2 CFR 200.88 
Simplified Acquisition Threshold), FRA will review and consider any 
information about the applicant that is in the designated integrity and 
performance system accessible through the System for Award Management 
(SAM) (currently the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity 
Information System (FAPIIS)) (see 41 U.S.C. 2313).
    An applicant, at its option, may review information in the 
designated integrity and performance systems accessible through SAM and 
comment on any information about itself that a Federal awarding agency 
previously entered and is currently in the designated integrity and 
performance system accessible through SAM.
    FRA will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to the 
other information in the designated integrity and performance system, 
in making a judgment about the applicant's integrity, business ethics, 
and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the 
review of risk posed by applicants as described in 2

[[Page 19708]]

CFR 200.205 (Federal Awarding Agency Review of Risk Posed by 
Applicants).

Section 4: Application and Submission Information

    Complete applications must be submitted to Grants.gov no later than 
5:00 p.m. DST, May 20, 2016. Applicants are strongly encouraged to 
apply early to ensure that all materials are received before this 
deadline.
    To apply for funding through Grants.gov, applicants must be 
properly registered. Complete instructions on how to register and 
submit an application can be found at Grants.gov gov. Registering with 
Grants.gov is a onetime process; however, it can take up to several 
weeks for first-time registrants to receive confirmation and a user 
password. FRA recommends that applicants start the registration process 
as early as possible to prevent delays that may preclude submitting an 
application package by the application deadline. Applications will not 
be accepted after the due date. Delayed registration is not an 
acceptable justification for an application extension. (Please note 
that if a Dun &Bradstreet (DUNS) number must be obtained, this may take 
a significant amount of time to complete.)
    Required documents for the application package are outlined in the 
following paragraphs. Applicants must complete and submit all 
components of the application package. FRA welcomes the submission of 
other relevant supporting documentation that may have been developed by 
the applicant (planning, engineering and design documentation, and 
letters of support). In particular, applications accompanied by 
completed feasibility studies and cost estimates may be more favorably 
considered during the evaluation process, as they demonstrate that an 
applicant has a greater understanding of the scope and cost of the 
project.
    Applicants should submit all application materials through 
Grants.gov. For any required or supporting application materials that 
an applicant is unable to submit via Grants.gov (such as oversized 
engineering drawings), an applicant may submit an original and two (2) 
copies to Mr. Marvin Winston, Office of Program Delivery, Federal 
Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W36-440, 
Washington, DC 20590; Email: [email protected]. However, due to 
delays caused by enhanced screening of mail delivered via the U.S. 
Postal Service, applicants are advised to use other means of conveyance 
(such as courier service) to assure timely receipt of materials. 
Additionally, if documents can be obtained online, direction to access 
files on a referenced Web site may also be sufficient.
    The following points describe the minimum content which are 
required in the Project Narrative component of grant applications 
(additionally, FRA recommends that the Project Narrative generally 
adhere to the following outline). These requirements must be satisfied 
through a narrative statement submitted by the applicant, and may be 
supported by spreadsheet documents, tables, maps, drawings, and other 
materials, as appropriate. The Project Narrative may not exceed 25 
pages in length (including any appendices). Applications containing 
Project Narratives that exceed this 25 page limitation will not be 
reviewed or considered for award.
    Applicants should read this section carefully and must submit all 
required information.
    1. Include a title page that lists the following elements in either 
a table or formatted list: Project title, location (i.e., city, State, 
district), the applicant organization name, the name of any co-
applicants, and the amount of Federal funding requested and the 
proposed non-Federal match.
    2. Designate a point of contact for the applicant and provide his 
or her name and contact information, including phone number, mailing 
address and email address. The point of contact must be an employee of 
an eligible applicant.
    3. Indicate the amount of Federal funding requested, the proposed 
non-Federal match, and total project cost. Additionally, identify any 
other sources of Federal funds committed to the project, as well as any 
pending Federal requests. Make sure to also note if the requested 
Federal funding must be obligated or expended by a certain date due to 
dependencies or relationships with other Federal or non-Federal funding 
sources, related projects, or other factors. Finally, specify whether 
Federal funding has ever previously been sought for the project and not 
secured, and name the Federal program and fiscal year for funding 
request.
    4. Explain how the applicant meets the applicant eligibility 
criteria, as outlined in Section 3 of this notice.
    5. Provide a brief 4-6 sentence summary of the proposed project, 
capturing the transportation challenges the proposed project aims to 
address, as well as the intended outcomes and anticipated benefits that 
will result from the proposed project.
    6. Include a detailed project description that expands upon the 
brief summary required above. This detailed description should provide, 
at a minimum, additional background on the transportation challenges 
the project aims to address, the expected users and beneficiaries of 
the project, the specific components and elements of the project, and 
any other information the applicant deems necessary to justify the 
proposed project. The detailed description should also clearly explain 
how the proposed project meets the project eligibility criteria, as 
outlined in Section 3 of this notice.
    7. Include a thorough discussion of how the project meets all of 
the evaluation criteria for the respective project type, as outlined in 
Section 3 of this notice. Applicants should note that FRA reviews 
applications based upon the evaluation criteria. If an application does 
not sufficiently address the evaluation criteria, it is unlikely to be 
a competitive application. In responding to the criteria, applicants 
are reminded to clearly identify, quantify, and compare expected 
benefits and costs of proposed projects. The FRA understands that the 
level of detail and sophistication of analysis that should be expected 
for relatively small projects (i.e., those encouraged to be limited to 
under $3,000,000 in this notice) is less than for larger investments.
    8. Describe proposed project implementation and project management 
arrangements. Include descriptions of the expected arrangements for 
project contracting, contract oversight, change-order management, risk 
management, and conformance to Federal requirements for project 
progress reporting.

Additional Application Elements

    Applicants must:
    [cir] Submit a Statement of Work (SOW) that addresses the scope, 
schedule, and budget for the proposed project if it were to be selected 
for award. The SOW must contain sufficient detail so that both FRA and 
the applicant can understand the expected outcomes of the proposed work 
to be performed and monitor progress toward completing project tasks 
and deliverables during a prospective grant's period of performance. 
FRA has developed a standard SOW template that applicants must use to 
be considered for award. The SOW templates and other required forms are 
located at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701;
    [cir] Describe anticipated environmental and historic preservation 
impacts associated with the proposed project, any environmental or 
historic preservation analyses that have been prepared, and progress 
toward

[[Page 19709]]

completing any environmental documentation or clearance required for 
the proposed project under National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 
the National Historic Preservation Act, section 4(f) of the U.S. DOT 
Act, the Clean Water Act, and other applicable Federal or State laws. 
Applicants are encouraged to contact FRA and obtain preliminary 
direction regarding the appropriate NEPA action and required 
environmental documentation. Generally, projects will be ineligible to 
receive funding if they have begun construction activities prior to the 
applicant receiving written approval from FRA that all environmental 
and historical analyses have been completed. Additional information 
regarding FRA's environmental processes and requirements are located at 
https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/L05286;
    [cir] Submit the FRA's Additional Assurances and Certifications;
    [cir] Submit an SF 424A--Budget Information for Non-Construction or 
SF 424C--Budget Information for Construction;
    [cir] Submit an SF 424B--Assurances for Non-Construction or SF 
424D--Assurances for Construction; and
    [cir] Submit an SF LLL: Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.

Section 5: Award Administration

    Award Notices for applications selected for funding will be 
announced after the application review period. FRA will contact 
successful applicants after announcement with information and 
instructions about the award process. Notification of a selected 
application is not an authorization to begin proposed project 
activities. The period of performance for grants awarded under this 
notice is dependent upon the project, and will be determined on a 
grant-by-grant basis. Extensions to the period of performance will be 
considered only through written requests to the FRA with specific and 
compelling justifications for why an extension is required. Any 
obligated funding that has not been spent by the grantee and reimbursed 
by the FRA upon completion of the grant will be de-obligated.
    The grantee and any sub-grantee must comply with all applicable 
laws and regulations. A non-exclusive list of administrative and 
national policy requirements that grantees must follow includes: 2 CFR 
part 200, procurement standards, compliance with Federal civil rights 
laws and regulations, disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE), 
debarment and suspension, drug-free workplace, FRA's and OMB's 
Assurances and Certifications, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 
labor standards, safety oversight, environmental protection, NEPA, 
environmental justice, and Buy America or Buy American provisions (as 
applicable).

Reporting Requirements

    The applicant will be required to comply with all standard FRA 
reporting requirements, including quarterly progress reports, quarterly 
Federal financial reports, and interim and final performance reports. 
Reports may be submitted electronically. The applicant must comply with 
all relevant requirements of 2 CFR 180.335 and 180.350.
    The grantee must comply with all post-award reporting, auditing, 
monitoring, and close-out requirements.

Section 6: Agency Contact

    If you have a project related question, you may call Dr. Mark 
Hartong, Scientific and Technical Advisor (Phone: (202) 493-1332; 
email: [email protected]), or Mr. Devin Rouse, Program Manager 
(Phone: (202) 493-6185, email: [email protected]). Grant application 
submission and processing questions should be addressed to Mr. Marvin 
Winston, Office of Program Delivery, Federal Railroad Administration, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W36-440, Washington, DC 20590; Email: 
[email protected].
    Information Collection: OMB has approved the information collection 
associated with the Rail Safety Technology Grants Program. The approval 
number for this collection of information is OMB No. 2130-0587.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 31, 2016.
Mary Ann McNamara,
Chief, Grant Management Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-07780 Filed 4-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P



                                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Notices                                            19705

                                                       Mr. Vardis Gaus wrote ‘‘I believe this               period of one year for the CLP. The                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:     If
                                                    extension to be valid.’’                                maximum time allowed between taking                   you have a project related question, you
                                                       Mr. Daniel Tucker commented ‘‘As a                   the knowledge tests and obtaining the                 may contact Dr. Mark Hartong,
                                                    CDL driver, instructor and state-certified              CDL is 12 months under the current rule               Scientific and Technical Advisor
                                                    third-party evaluator I believe this                    and under the exemption. The                          (Phone: (202) 493–1332; email:
                                                    proposal/request makes all the sense in                 exemption avoids the necessity of                     Mark.Hartong@dot.gov), or Mr. Devin
                                                    the world. Allowing up-to a year                        obtaining a renewal of the CLP after 6                Rouse, Program Manager (Phone: (202)
                                                    practice and development for an entry                   months if the State chooses to allow                  493–6185, email: devin.rouse@dot.gov).
                                                    level driver candidate or re-entering                   that. FMCSA determined that the                       Grant application submission and
                                                    driver allows them to take as much time                 exemption would maintain a level of                   processing questions should be
                                                    necessary to build (or rebuild) skills.’’               safety equivalent to, or greater than, the            addressed to Mr. Marvin Winston,
                                                       Four comments opposing the                           level achieved without the exemption                  Office of Program Delivery, Federal
                                                    exemption were from the Commercial                      (49 CFR 381.305(a)).                                  Railroad Administration, 1200 New
                                                    Vehicle Training Association (CVTA)                       Issued on: March 25, 2016.                          Jersey Avenue SE., Room W36–440,
                                                    and three individuals.                                  T.F. Scott Darling, III,                              Washington, DC 20590; Email:
                                                       The CVTA summarized its opposition                                                                         marvin.winston@dot.gov.
                                                    to the exemption by stating ‘‘We urge                   Acting Administrator.
                                                                                                            [FR Doc. 2016–07730 Filed 4–4–16; 8:45 am]            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                    FMCSA to deny ODOT’s request for an                                                                              Notice to applicants: FRA
                                                    exemption from the 180-day CLP                          BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
                                                                                                                                                                  recommends applicants read this notice
                                                    renewal requirement. Granting such an                                                                         in its entirety prior to preparing
                                                    exemption carries serious safety                                                                              application materials. There are several
                                                    concerns and sends the wrong message                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                                                                                                                                                  administrative prerequisites described
                                                    regarding FMCSA’s willingness to                        Federal Railroad Administration                       herein that applicants must comply
                                                    accommodate underfunded CDL                                                                                   with in order to submit an application,
                                                    programs across the Country. Granting                   FY 2016 Railroad Safety Technology                    as well as specific eligibility
                                                    this exemption would signal to states                   Grant Funds                                           requirements that must be met.
                                                    that FMCSA will not only tolerate state                                                                       Additionally, applicants should note
                                                    practices of underfunding CDL                           AGENCY: Federal Railroad
                                                                                                            Administration (FRA), Department of                   that the required Project Narrative
                                                    programs, but will accommodate them.                                                                          component of the application package
                                                    Moreover, granting this exemption                       Transportation (DOT).
                                                                                                            ACTION: Notice of Funding Opportunity
                                                                                                                                                                  may not exceed 25 pages in length
                                                    would undercut Congress’ recent efforts                                                                       (including any appendices).
                                                    to put greater pressure on FMCSA and                    (NOFO).
                                                    states to ensure that state CDL programs                                                                      Table of Contents
                                                                                                            SUMMARY:    This notice details the
                                                    are more adequately funded and                          application requirements and                          1. Funding Opportunity Description
                                                    efficiently administered.’’                             procedures for obtaining funding for                  2. Award Information
                                                       Josh Anonymous wrote ‘‘Don’t do it.                  eligible Railroad Safety Technology                   3. Eligibility and Review Criteria
                                                    Six months is plenty.’’                                 Grant projects. The opportunities                     4. Application and Submission Information
                                                       Mr. Roland Doe wrote ‘‘Send a                                                                              5. Award Administration Information
                                                                                                            described in this notice are available
                                                    message to such an unfriendly                                                                                 6. Agency Contact
                                                                                                            under Catalog of Federal Domestic
                                                    bureaucracy: NO dice on the waiver                                                                            Section 1: Funding Opportunity
                                                                                                            Assistance number 20.321, ‘‘Railroad
                                                    request. If other states can meet the                                                                         Description
                                                                                                            Safety Technology.’’
                                                    Federal requirement—and the majority
                                                                                                            DATES: Applications for funding under                   The purpose of this notice is to solicit
                                                    of them are much easier to do business
                                                    with—even California—so can ODOT.’’                     this solicitation are due no later than               applications for grants for eligible
                                                       Mr. Gary Scott commented that ‘‘A                    5:00 p.m. DST May 20, 2016.                           railroad safety technology projects.
                                                    learner’s permit should only be valid for               Applications for funding received after               Congress appropriated the funding
                                                    6 months. If a person cannot achieve a                  5:00 p.m. DST on May 20, 2016 will not                available under this NOFO, $25 million,
                                                    level of proficiency within that time                   be considered. See Section 4 of this                  in the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
                                                    period to acquire a permanent CDL then                  notice for additional information                     2016, Division L, Title I (Pub. L. 114–
                                                    maybe they should consider another                      regarding the application process.                    113 (December 18, 2015)), to carry out
                                                    line of work.’’                                         ADDRESSES: Applications must be                       railroad safety technology grants as set
                                                       All comments are available for review                submitted via Grants.gov. For any                     forth in 49 U.S.C. 20158. To maximize
                                                    in the docket for this notice.                          required or supporting application                    the benefits of the funding available,
                                                                                                            materials that an applicant is unable to              FRA is limiting the eligible projects to
                                                    V. FMCSA Response and Decision                          submit via Grants.gov (such as oversized              those that implement a Positive Train
                                                      The FMCSA has evaluated ODOT’s                        engineering drawings), an applicant                   Control (PTC) system or, as described in
                                                    application on its merits following full                may submit an original and two (2)                    Section 3, will otherwise benefit overall
                                                    consideration of the comments                           copies to Mr. Marvin Winston, Office of               PTC system implementation on freight,
                                                    submitted to the docket, and has                        Program Delivery, Federal Railroad                    intercity passenger, and commuter
                                                    decided to grant the exemption from 49                  Administration, 1200 New Jersey                       railroads.
                                                    CFR 383.25(c) for a period of 2 years.                  Avenue SE., Room W36–440,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    The exemption covers ODOT and all                       Washington, DC 20590; Email:                          Section 2: Award Information
                                                    SDLAs. Extending the exemption to                       marvin.winston@dot.gov. However, due                    FRA anticipates making multiple
                                                    cover all SDLAs, at their discretion, will              to delays caused by enhanced screening                awards from the funding made available
                                                    preclude the need for other SDLAs                       of mail delivered via the U.S. Postal                 in this notice and is not predetermining
                                                    choosing to use the exemption to file                   Service, applicants are advised to use                any minimum or maximum dollar
                                                    identical exemption requests. FMCSA                     other means of conveyance (such as                    amounts for awards. However, given the
                                                    believes that safety would not be                       courier service) to assure timely receipt             limited amount of funding currently
                                                    diminished by allowing a validity                       of materials.                                         available, applicants are encouraged to


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:18 Apr 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00157   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM   05APN1


                                                    19706                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Notices

                                                    limit their Federal funding requests to a               Train Control Implementation Plan                     solutions to configuration management
                                                    maximum of $3,000,000 per application.                  (PTCIP) to FRA as required by 49 U.S.C.               of multi-railroad PTC software and
                                                    While this $3,000,000 application limit                 20157(a). FRA considers the                           firmware deployments, eliminate PTC
                                                    is a recommendation and not a firm                      development and submission of a                       communications interference; provide
                                                    requirement, applicants exceeding this                  revised PTCIP under 49 U.S.C. 20157(a)                configuration management of multi-
                                                    $3,000,000 threshold must explain why                   to meet the eligibility requirement                   railroad PTC software and firmware
                                                    any requested funding over $3,000,000                   related to submitting a plan required                 deployments; and provide host-tenant
                                                    is necessary to implement the proposed                  under 49 U.S.C. 20156(e)(2) containing                railroad PTC interoperability/system
                                                    project. Collaborative applicants                       an analysis of the impact, feasibility,               certification.
                                                    submitting a project that will benefit                  costs and benefits of implementing PTC                   Examples of eligible projects include
                                                    more than five (5) entities (e.g., one                  system technology. FRA believes that                  the following:
                                                    entity implementing back office systems                 any submission connected to sec.                         • Costs for implementation,
                                                    for multiple (five or more) railroads)                  20156(e)(2), which has yet to be                      installation, and testing of PTC systems;
                                                    may request up to the authorized                        incorporated into a Federal regulation,                  • Costs for shared PTC infrastructure
                                                    appropriation limit of $25,000,000.                     would merely be duplicative of what a                 (e.g., back office systems, CAD systems);
                                                    Additionally, FRA may choose to award                   railroad analyzed when it developed                   and
                                                    a grant for less than the amount                        and submitted a revised PTCIP. Thus,                     • Costs to advance PTC
                                                    requested in the application. FRA will                  FRA considers the submission of a                     interoperability, such as pilot programs,
                                                    make awards for projects selected under                 revised PTCIP to meet the eligibility                 standardization committees,
                                                    this notice as grants with an 80%                       requirements in 49 U.S.C. 20158(b)(3)                 development of standard processes, and
                                                    federal/20% non-federal cost share. The                 for purposes of this NOFO. If an                      spectrum acquisition, sharing, and
                                                    funding provided under these grants                     applicant is not required to comply with              desensitization.
                                                    will be made available to grantees on a                 either sec. 20157(a) or sec. 20156(e)(2),             Applicants should note that these
                                                    reimbursable basis.                                     the applicant must demonstrate that to                aspects represent suggested areas of
                                                       Applications will proceed through a                  FRA’s satisfaction in its NOFO                        interest by the FRA, and any otherwise
                                                    three-part review process:                              application.                                          eligible applications meeting the criteria
                                                       1. Screening for completeness and                       The FRA is soliciting applications for
                                                                                                                                                                  above will be evaluated and considered
                                                    eligibility;                                            projects that will benefit overall PTC
                                                                                                                                                                  for award.
                                                       2. Evaluation of eligible applications               system implementation on freight,
                                                                                                            intercity passenger, and commuter                        By statute, 49 U.S.C. 20158 allows for
                                                    by technical panels applying the                                                                              up to an 80 percent Federal share of
                                                    evaluation criteria; and                                railroads. Under 49 U.S.C. 20158(b)(2),
                                                                                                            the FRA shall give priority to projects               project costs. The required 20 percent
                                                       3. Project selection by the FRA
                                                                                                            that (A) focus on making technologies                 non-Federal match may be comprised of
                                                    Administrator applying additional
                                                                                                            interoperable between railroad systems,               public sector (state or local) or private
                                                    selection criteria.
                                                                                                            such as train control technologies; (B)               sector funding. However, the FRA
                                                       Each application will first be screened
                                                                                                            accelerate train control technology                   cannot consider any other Federal
                                                    for eligibility (requirements outlined in
                                                                                                            deployment on high-risk corridors, such               funds, nor any non-Federal funds
                                                    Section 3 of this notice) and
                                                                                                            as those that have high volumes of                    already expended (or otherwise
                                                    completeness (containing all required
                                                                                                            hazardous materials shipments or over                 encumbered), towards the matching
                                                    documentation outlined in Section 4 of
                                                                                                            which commuter or passenger trains                    requirement. Additionally, FRA is
                                                    this notice).
                                                       A technical panel consisting of                      operate; or (C) benefit both passenger                limiting the method for calculating the
                                                    subject-matter experts will evaluate                    and freight safety and efficiency. Given              non-Federal match to cash contributions
                                                    eligible and complete applications using                that the amount of funding available is               only—‘‘in-kind’’ contributions will not
                                                    the evaluation criteria outlined in                     not likely sufficient to cover the costs              be accepted. Matching funds provided
                                                    Section 3 of this notice. FRA will award                necessary to deploy PTC on any given                  in excess of the minimum requirement
                                                    funds to projects that are well-aligned                 railroad, FRA will further prioritize                 will be considered in evaluating the
                                                    with one or more of the evaluation and                  projects that not only fall within these              merit of an application.
                                                    selection criteria. In addition, FRA will               areas but also involve:                                  FRA intends to award funds to PTC
                                                    consider whether a project has a                           1. An entity or entities that have                 projects that achieve the maximum
                                                    negative effect on any of the evaluation                submitted a revised PTCIP and                         public benefits possible. Analysis
                                                    and selection criteria, and any such                    demonstrated progress in implementing                 provided by applicants that quantifies
                                                    negative effect may reduce the                          PTC in accordance with its PTCIP and                  the monetary value (whenever possible)
                                                    likelihood that it will select the project              have shown good faith in attempting to                of the anticipated public benefits of the
                                                    for award.                                              timely complete PTC implementation;                   proposed project will be particularly
                                                                                                               2. Collaboration between freight and               relevant to the FRA in evaluating
                                                    Section 3: Eligibility and Review                       passenger railroad carriers, railroad                 applications. The systematic process of
                                                    Criteria                                                suppliers, and State and local                        comparing expected benefits and costs
                                                      The following entities are eligible                   governments, particularly related to                  helps decision-makers organize
                                                    applicants for PTC implementation                       interoperability and other industry-wide              information about, and evaluate
                                                    projects:                                               PTC technical and management issues;                  tradeoffs between, alternative
                                                      • Passenger and freight railroad                         3. The development and deployment                  transportation investments. FRA will
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    carriers;                                               of technologies that will lower costs,                consider benefits and costs using
                                                      • Railroad suppliers; and                             accelerate implementation, increase                   standard data and qualitative
                                                      • State and local governments for                     interoperability between host and tenant              information provided by applicants and
                                                    projects that have a public benefit of                  operations, and improve reliability of                will evaluate applications in a manner
                                                    improved safety and network efficiency.                 PTC systems; and                                      consistent with Executive Order 12893
                                                      To be eligible for assistance, the above                 4. The development and deployment                  (Principles for Federal Infrastructure
                                                    entities subject to 49 U.S.C. 20157(a)                  of technologies that will eliminate PTC               Investments, 59 FR 4233), Office of
                                                    must have submitted a revised Positive                  communications interference, provide                  Management and Budget (OMB)


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:18 Apr 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00158   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM   05APN1


                                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Notices                                            19707

                                                    Circular A–94 (Guidelines and Discount                  that may be considered include, but are               assets or agreements with railroad
                                                    Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of                      not limited to, suitability, quality, skills,         operators and infrastructure owners at
                                                    Federal Programs), and OMB Circular                     price, and life-cycle cost. The mix of                the time of application; and
                                                    A–4 (Regulatory Analysis). Applications                 these and other factors and the relevant                • The extent to which the proposed
                                                    for PTC projects will be reviewed by                    importance of each will vary on a case                project complements previous FRA or
                                                    DOT subject matter experts against the                  by case basis;                                        DOT awards.
                                                    following three evaluation criteria:                       • The reasonableness and realism of
                                                                                                                                                                  Region/Location
                                                      • PTC Deployment Benefits;                            the proposed costs;
                                                      • Technical Merit; and                                   • The extent of proposed cost sharing                 • The extent to which the proposed
                                                      • Project Development approach.                       or cost participation under the proposed              project increases the economic
                                                                                                            effort (exclusive of the applicant’s prior            productivity of land, capital, or labor at
                                                    PTC Deployment Benefits                                                                                       specific locations, particularly in
                                                                                                            investment); and
                                                      The following factors will be                            • Preference will be given to projects             economically distressed areas;
                                                    considered in assessing a proposed                      that can demonstrate an ability to                       • Ensuring appropriate level of
                                                    project’s achievement of PTC                            substantially complete work, or                       regional balance across the country;
                                                    deployment benefits:                                    otherwise provide benefits to industry,                  • Ensuring consistency with national
                                                      • The degree to which the successful                  prior to December 31, 2018.                           transportation and rail network
                                                    implementation of the proposed project                     All evaluation criteria, when                      objectives; and
                                                    would advance the technical                             combined, are significantly more                         • Ensuring integration with other rail
                                                    deployment of PTC, including                            important than cost or price alone.                   services and transportation modes.
                                                    improvements to reliability, safety,                    While cost or price will be a factor that             Innovation/Resource Development
                                                    security, and maintainability;                          is considered, technical merit is
                                                      • The degree to which the successful                  appreciably more important and, as                       • Pursuing new rail technologies that
                                                    implementation of the proposed project                  such, greater consideration will be given             result in favorable public return on
                                                    would decrease PTC implementation                       to technical excellence. An offer must                investment and ensure delivery of
                                                    and maintenance costs; and                              be found acceptable under all applicable              project benefits; and
                                                      • The degree to which the project                     evaluation factors to be considered                      • Promoting innovations that
                                                    maximizes the return on investment                      eligible for award.                                   demonstrate the value of new
                                                    (ROI) towards industry-wide                                                                                   approaches to, among other things,
                                                    implementation efforts.                                 Selection Criteria                                    transportation funding and finance,
                                                                                                               In addition to the evaluation criteria             contracting, project delivery, congestion
                                                    Technical Merit                                                                                               management, safety management, asset
                                                                                                            outlined above, the FRA Administrator
                                                      The following factors will be                         will apply the following selection                    management, or long-term operations
                                                    considered in assessing a proposed                      criteria to further ensure that the                   and maintenance.
                                                    project’s technical merit:                              projects selected for funding advance                 Federal Awardee Performance and
                                                      • The degree to which the proposed                    FRA’s current mission and key                         Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)
                                                    project exhibits a sound scientific and                 priorities:                                           Review
                                                    engineering basis;                                         Alignment with the DOT Strategic
                                                      • The degree to which the proposed                    Goals and Priorities                                     Before making a Federal award with
                                                    project could be practically applied in                    • Improving transportation safety;                 a total amount of Federal share greater
                                                    and compatible with the railroad’s                         • Maintaining transportation                       than the simplified acquisition
                                                    operating environment and                               infrastructure in a state of good repair;             threshold (see 2 CFR 200.88 Simplified
                                                    infrastructure; and                                        • Promoting economic                               Acquisition Threshold), FRA will
                                                      • The perceived likelihood of                         competitiveness;                                      review and consider any information
                                                    technical and practical success.                           • Advancing environmentally                        about the applicant that is in the
                                                                                                            sustainable transportation policies;                  designated integrity and performance
                                                    Project Development Approach
                                                                                                               • Enhancing quality of life; and                   system accessible through the System
                                                       The following factors will be                           • Building ladders of opportunity to               for Award Management (SAM)
                                                    considered in assessing the proposed                    expand the middle class.                              (currently the Federal Awardee
                                                    project’s planning and development to                      Proposed projects that demonstrate                 Performance and Integrity Information
                                                    date:                                                   the ability to provide reliable, safe and             System (FAPIIS)) (see 41 U.S.C. 2313).
                                                       • The technical qualifications and                   affordable transportation choices to                     An applicant, at its option, may
                                                    demonstrated experience of key                          connect economically disadvantaged                    review information in the designated
                                                    personnel proposed to lead and perform                  populations, non-drivers, senior                      integrity and performance systems
                                                    the technical efforts, and qualifications               citizens, and persons with disabilities in            accessible through SAM and comment
                                                    of primary and supporting organizations                 disconnected communities with                         on any information about itself that a
                                                    to fully and successfully execute the                   employment, training and education                    Federal awarding agency previously
                                                    proposal plan within the proposed                       will receive particular consideration                 entered and is currently in the
                                                    timeframe and budget;                                   during project selection.                             designated integrity and performance
                                                       • The degree to which proposed effort                                                                      system accessible through SAM.
                                                    is supported by multiple entities (letters              Project Delivery Performance                             FRA will consider any comments by
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    of support are encouraged);                               • The applicant’s track record in                   the applicant, in addition to the other
                                                       • The affordability and degree to                    successfully delivering previous FRA                  information in the designated integrity
                                                    which the proposed effort appears to be                 and DOT grants on time, on budget, and                and performance system, in making a
                                                    a good value for the amount of funding                  for the full intended scope;                          judgment about the applicant’s integrity,
                                                    requested. Good value is defined as                       • The applicant’s means for achieving               business ethics, and record of
                                                    believing or concluding that the goods/                 satisfactory continuing control over                  performance under Federal awards
                                                    services received were worth the price                  project assets in a timely manner,                    when completing the review of risk
                                                    paid. Examples of the types of factors                  including public ownership of project                 posed by applicants as described in 2


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:18 Apr 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00159   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM   05APN1


                                                    19708                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Notices

                                                    CFR 200.205 (Federal Awarding Agency                    of materials. Additionally, if documents              summary required above. This detailed
                                                    Review of Risk Posed by Applicants).                    can be obtained online, direction to                  description should provide, at a
                                                                                                            access files on a referenced Web site                 minimum, additional background on the
                                                    Section 4: Application and Submission
                                                                                                            may also be sufficient.                               transportation challenges the project
                                                    Information                                                The following points describe the                  aims to address, the expected users and
                                                      Complete applications must be                         minimum content which are required in                 beneficiaries of the project, the specific
                                                    submitted to Grants.gov no later than                   the Project Narrative component of grant              components and elements of the project,
                                                    5:00 p.m. DST, May 20, 2016.                            applications (additionally, FRA                       and any other information the applicant
                                                    Applicants are strongly encouraged to                   recommends that the Project Narrative                 deems necessary to justify the proposed
                                                    apply early to ensure that all materials                generally adhere to the following                     project. The detailed description should
                                                    are received before this deadline.                      outline). These requirements must be                  also clearly explain how the proposed
                                                      To apply for funding through                          satisfied through a narrative statement               project meets the project eligibility
                                                    Grants.gov, applicants must be properly                 submitted by the applicant, and may be                criteria, as outlined in Section 3 of this
                                                    registered. Complete instructions on                    supported by spreadsheet documents,                   notice.
                                                    how to register and submit an                           tables, maps, drawings, and other                        7. Include a thorough discussion of
                                                    application can be found at Grants. gov.                materials, as appropriate. The Project                how the project meets all of the
                                                    Registering with Grants.gov is a onetime                Narrative may not exceed 25 pages in                  evaluation criteria for the respective
                                                    process; however, it can take up to                     length (including any appendices).                    project type, as outlined in Section 3 of
                                                    several weeks for first-time registrants to             Applications containing Project                       this notice. Applicants should note that
                                                    receive confirmation and a user                         Narratives that exceed this 25 page                   FRA reviews applications based upon
                                                    password. FRA recommends that                           limitation will not be reviewed or                    the evaluation criteria. If an application
                                                    applicants start the registration process               considered for award.                                 does not sufficiently address the
                                                    as early as possible to prevent delays                     Applicants should read this section                evaluation criteria, it is unlikely to be a
                                                    that may preclude submitting an                         carefully and must submit all required                competitive application. In responding
                                                    application package by the application                  information.                                          to the criteria, applicants are reminded
                                                    deadline. Applications will not be                         1. Include a title page that lists the             to clearly identify, quantify, and
                                                    accepted after the due date. Delayed                    following elements in either a table or               compare expected benefits and costs of
                                                    registration is not an acceptable                       formatted list: Project title, location (i.e.,        proposed projects. The FRA
                                                    justification for an application                        city, State, district), the applicant                 understands that the level of detail and
                                                    extension. (Please note that if a Dun                   organization name, the name of any co-                sophistication of analysis that should be
                                                    &Bradstreet (DUNS) number must be                       applicants, and the amount of Federal                 expected for relatively small projects
                                                    obtained, this may take a significant                   funding requested and the proposed                    (i.e., those encouraged to be limited to
                                                    amount of time to complete.)                            non-Federal match.                                    under $3,000,000 in this notice) is less
                                                      Required documents for the                               2. Designate a point of contact for the            than for larger investments.
                                                    application package are outlined in the                 applicant and provide his or her name                    8. Describe proposed project
                                                    following paragraphs. Applicants must                   and contact information, including                    implementation and project
                                                    complete and submit all components of                   phone number, mailing address and                     management arrangements. Include
                                                    the application package. FRA welcomes                   email address. The point of contact                   descriptions of the expected
                                                    the submission of other relevant                        must be an employee of an eligible                    arrangements for project contracting,
                                                    supporting documentation that may                       applicant.                                            contract oversight, change-order
                                                    have been developed by the applicant                       3. Indicate the amount of Federal                  management, risk management, and
                                                    (planning, engineering and design                       funding requested, the proposed non-                  conformance to Federal requirements
                                                    documentation, and letters of support).                 Federal match, and total project cost.                for project progress reporting.
                                                    In particular, applications accompanied                 Additionally, identify any other sources
                                                    by completed feasibility studies and                    of Federal funds committed to the                     Additional Application Elements
                                                    cost estimates may be more favorably                    project, as well as any pending Federal                 Applicants must:
                                                    considered during the evaluation                        requests. Make sure to also note if the                 Æ Submit a Statement of Work (SOW)
                                                    process, as they demonstrate that an                    requested Federal funding must be                     that addresses the scope, schedule, and
                                                    applicant has a greater understanding of                obligated or expended by a certain date               budget for the proposed project if it
                                                    the scope and cost of the project.                      due to dependencies or relationships                  were to be selected for award. The SOW
                                                      Applicants should submit all                          with other Federal or non-Federal                     must contain sufficient detail so that
                                                    application materials through                           funding sources, related projects, or                 both FRA and the applicant can
                                                    Grants.gov. For any required or                         other factors. Finally, specify whether               understand the expected outcomes of
                                                    supporting application materials that an                Federal funding has ever previously                   the proposed work to be performed and
                                                    applicant is unable to submit via                       been sought for the project and not                   monitor progress toward completing
                                                    Grants.gov (such as oversized                           secured, and name the Federal program                 project tasks and deliverables during a
                                                    engineering drawings), an applicant                     and fiscal year for funding request.                  prospective grant’s period of
                                                    may submit an original and two (2)                         4. Explain how the applicant meets                 performance. FRA has developed a
                                                    copies to Mr. Marvin Winston, Office of                 the applicant eligibility criteria, as                standard SOW template that applicants
                                                    Program Delivery, Federal Railroad                      outlined in Section 3 of this notice.                 must use to be considered for award.
                                                    Administration, 1200 New Jersey                            5. Provide a brief 4–6 sentence                    The SOW templates and other required
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Avenue SE., Room W36–440,                               summary of the proposed project,                      forms are located at www.fra.dot.gov/
                                                    Washington, DC 20590; Email:                            capturing the transportation challenges               Page/P0701;
                                                    marvin.winston@dot.gov. However, due                    the proposed project aims to address, as                Æ Describe anticipated environmental
                                                    to delays caused by enhanced screening                  well as the intended outcomes and                     and historic preservation impacts
                                                    of mail delivered via the U.S. Postal                   anticipated benefits that will result from            associated with the proposed project,
                                                    Service, applicants are advised to use                  the proposed project.                                 any environmental or historic
                                                    other means of conveyance (such as                         6. Include a detailed project                      preservation analyses that have been
                                                    courier service) to assure timely receipt               description that expands upon the brief               prepared, and progress toward


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:18 Apr 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00160   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM   05APN1


                                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Notices                                            19709

                                                    completing any environmental                            Assurances and Certifications,                        Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to
                                                    documentation or clearance required for                 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),                request the Office of Management and
                                                    the proposed project under National                     labor standards, safety oversight,                    Budget (OMB) to approve the revision of
                                                    Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the                    environmental protection, NEPA,                       the currently approved information
                                                    National Historic Preservation Act,                     environmental justice, and Buy America                collection:
                                                    section 4(f) of the U.S. DOT Act, the                   or Buy American provisions (as                          49 U.S.C. Sections 5310 and 5311—Capital
                                                    Clean Water Act, and other applicable                   applicable).                                          Assistance Program for Elderly Persons and
                                                    Federal or State laws. Applicants are                                                                         Persons with Disabilities and Non-Urbanized
                                                    encouraged to contact FRA and obtain                    Reporting Requirements
                                                                                                                                                                  Area Formula Program
                                                    preliminary direction regarding the                        The applicant will be required to                    OMB Control No.: 2132–0500
                                                    appropriate NEPA action and required                    comply with all standard FRA reporting                DATES:  Comments must be submitted
                                                    environmental documentation.                            requirements, including quarterly                     before June 6, 2016.
                                                    Generally, projects will be ineligible to               progress reports, quarterly Federal
                                                                                                                                                                  ADDRESSES: To ensure that your
                                                    receive funding if they have begun                      financial reports, and interim and final
                                                                                                                                                                  comments are not entered more than
                                                    construction activities prior to the                    performance reports. Reports may be
                                                                                                                                                                  once into the docket, submit comments
                                                    applicant receiving written approval                    submitted electronically. The applicant
                                                                                                                                                                  identified by the docket number by only
                                                    from FRA that all environmental and                     must comply with all relevant
                                                                                                                                                                  one of the following methods:
                                                    historical analyses have been                           requirements of 2 CFR 180.335 and                       1. Web site: www.regulations.gov.
                                                    completed. Additional information                       180.350.                                              Follow the instructions for submitting
                                                    regarding FRA’s environmental                              The grantee must comply with all
                                                                                                                                                                  comments on the U.S. Government
                                                    processes and requirements are located                  post-award reporting, auditing,
                                                                                                                                                                  electronic docket site. (Note: The U.S.
                                                    at https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/                monitoring, and close-out requirements.
                                                                                                                                                                  Department of Transportation’s (DOT’s)
                                                    L05286;                                                 Section 6: Agency Contact                             electronic docket is no longer accepting
                                                       Æ Submit the FRA’s Additional
                                                                                                              If you have a project related question,             electronic comments.) All electronic
                                                    Assurances and Certifications;
                                                       Æ Submit an SF 424A—Budget                           you may call Dr. Mark Hartong,                        submissions must be made to the U.S.
                                                    Information for Non-Construction or SF                  Scientific and Technical Advisor                      Government electronic docket site at
                                                    424C—Budget Information for                             (Phone: (202) 493–1332; email:                        www.regulations.gov. Commenters
                                                    Construction;                                           Mark.Hartong@dot.gov), or Mr. Devin                   should follow the directions below for
                                                       Æ Submit an SF 424B—Assurances                       Rouse, Program Manager (Phone: (202)                  mailed and hand-delivered comments.
                                                    for Non-Construction or SF 424D—                        493–6185, email: devin.rouse@dot.gov).                  2. Fax: 202–493–2251.
                                                    Assurances for Construction; and                        Grant application submission and                        3. Mail: U.S. Department of
                                                       Æ Submit an SF LLL: Disclosure of                    processing questions should be                        Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
                                                    Lobbying Activities.                                    addressed to Mr. Marvin Winston,                      Avenue SE., Docket Operations, M–30,
                                                                                                            Office of Program Delivery, Federal                   West Building, Ground Floor, Room
                                                    Section 5: Award Administration                                                                               W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
                                                                                                            Railroad Administration, 1200 New
                                                       Award Notices for applications                       Jersey Avenue SE., Room W36–440,                         4. Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
                                                    selected for funding will be announced                  Washington, DC 20590; Email:                          Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
                                                    after the application review period. FRA                marvin.winston@dot.gov.                               Avenue SE., Docket Operations, M–30,
                                                    will contact successful applicants after                  Information Collection: OMB has                     West Building, Ground Floor, Room
                                                    announcement with information and                       approved the information collection                   W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001
                                                    instructions about the award process.                   associated with the Rail Safety                       between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,
                                                    Notification of a selected application is               Technology Grants Program. The                        Monday through Friday, except federal
                                                    not an authorization to begin proposed                  approval number for this collection of                holidays.
                                                    project activities. The period of                       information is OMB No. 2130–0587.                        Instructions: You must include the
                                                    performance for grants awarded under                                                                          agency name and docket number for this
                                                                                                              Issued in Washington, DC on March 31,
                                                    this notice is dependent upon the                       2016.
                                                                                                                                                                  notice at the beginning of your
                                                    project, and will be determined on a                                                                          comments. Submit two copies of your
                                                                                                            Mary Ann McNamara,
                                                    grant-by-grant basis. Extensions to the                                                                       comments if you submit them by mail.
                                                                                                            Chief, Grant Management Division.                     For confirmation that FTA has received
                                                    period of performance will be
                                                    considered only through written                         [FR Doc. 2016–07780 Filed 4–4–16; 8:45 am]            your comments, include a self-
                                                    requests to the FRA with specific and                   BILLING CODE 4910–06–P                                addressed stamped postcard. Note that
                                                    compelling justifications for why an                                                                          all comments received, including any
                                                    extension is required. Any obligated                                                                          personal information, will be posted
                                                    funding that has not been spent by the                  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                          and will be available to Internet users,
                                                    grantee and reimbursed by the FRA                                                                             without change, to www.regulations.gov.
                                                                                                            Federal Transit Administration
                                                    upon completion of the grant will be de-                                                                      You may review DOT’s complete
                                                    obligated.                                              [FTA Docket No. 2016–0018]                            Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
                                                       The grantee and any sub-grantee must                                                                       Register published April 11, 2000, (65
                                                    comply with all applicable laws and                     Notice of Request for Extension of a                  FR 19477), or you may visit
                                                    regulations. A non-exclusive list of                    Currently Approved Information                        www.regulations.gov. Docket: For access
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    administrative and national policy                      Collection                                            to the docket to read background
                                                    requirements that grantees must follow                  AGENCY:    Federal Transit Administration,            documents and comments received, go
                                                    includes: 2 CFR part 200, procurement                   DOT.                                                  to www.regulations.gov at any time.
                                                    standards, compliance with Federal                      ACTION:   Notice of request for comments.             Background documents and comments
                                                    civil rights laws and regulations,                                                                            received may also be viewed at the U.S.
                                                    disadvantaged business enterprises                      SUMMARY:  In accordance with the                      Department of Transportation, 1200
                                                    (DBE), debarment and suspension, drug-                  Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this                 New Jersey Avenue SE., Docket
                                                    free workplace, FRA’s and OMB’s                         notice announces the intention of the                 Operations, M–30, West Building,


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:18 Apr 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00161   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM   05APN1



Document Created: 2018-02-07 13:53:31
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 13:53:31
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
DatesApplications for funding under this solicitation are due no later than 5:00 p.m. DST May 20, 2016. Applications for funding received after 5:00 p.m. DST on May 20, 2016 will not be considered. See Section 4 of this notice for additional information regarding the application process.
ContactIf you have a project related question, you may contact Dr. Mark Hartong, Scientific and Technical Advisor (Phone: (202) 493-1332; email: [email protected]), or Mr. Devin Rouse, Program Manager (Phone: (202) 493-6185, email: [email protected]). Grant application submission and processing
FR Citation81 FR 19705 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR