81 FR 20643 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 68 (April 8, 2016)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 68 (April 8, 2016)
| Page Range | 20643-20646 | |
| FR Document | 2016-08106 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 20643-20646] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-08106] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [Document Identifier: CMS-317, CMS-319, CMS-10166, CMS-10178, and CMS- 10184] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. [[Page 20644]] ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is announcing an opportunity for the public to comment on CMS' intention to collect information from the public. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA), federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information (including each proposed extension or reinstatement of an existing collection of information) and to allow 60 days for public comment on the proposed action. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding our burden estimates or any other aspect of this collection of information, including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology to minimize the information collection burden. DATES: Comments must be received by June 7, 2016. ADDRESSES: When commenting, please reference the document identifier or OMB control number. To be assured consideration, comments and recommendations must be submitted in any one of the following ways: 1. Electronically. You may send your comments electronically to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for ``Comment or Submission'' or ``More Search Options'' to find the information collection document(s) that are accepting comments. 2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following address: CMS, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs, Division of Regulations Development, Attention: Document Identifier/OMB Control Number ___, Room C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850. To obtain copies of a supporting statement and any related forms for the proposed collection(s) summarized in this notice, you may make your request using one of following: 1. Access CMS' Web site address at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PaperworkReductionActof1995. 2. Email your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and CMS document identifier, to [email protected]. 3. Call the Reports Clearance Office at (410) 786-1326. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reports Clearance Office at (410) 786- 1326. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Contents This notice sets out a summary of the use and burden associated with the following information collections. More detailed information can be found in each collection's supporting statement and associated materials (see ADDRESSES). CMS-317 State Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control Sampling Plan CMS-319 State Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control Sample Selection Lists CMS-10166 Payment Error Rate Measurement in Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program CMS-10178 Medicaid and State Children's Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP) Managed Care CMS-10184 Payment Error Rate Measurement--State Medicaid and SCHIP Eligibility Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. The term ``collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA requires federal agencies to publish a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension or reinstatement of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, CMS is publishing this notice. 1. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently approved collection; Title of Information Collection: State Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC) Sample Plans; Use: The Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC) system is based on monthly State reviews of Medicaid and Medicaid expansion under Title XXI cases by States performing the traditional sampling process identified through statistically reliable statewide samples of cases selected from the eligibility files. These reviews are conducted to determine whether or not the sampled cases meet applicable State Title XIX or XXI eligibility requirements when applicable. The reviews are also used to assess beneficiary liability, if any, and to determine the amounts paid to provide Medicaid services for these cases. In the MEQC system, sampling is the only practical method of validating eligibility of the total caseload and determining the dollar value of eligibility liability errors. Any attempt to make such validations and determinations by reviewing every case would be an enormous and unwieldy undertaking. In 1993, CMS implemented MEQC pilots in which States could focus on special studies, targeted populations, geographic areas or other forms of oversight with CMS approval. States must submit a sampling plan, or pilot proposal to be approved by CMS before implementing their pilot program. The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) was enacted February 4, 2009. Sections 203 and 601 of the CHIPRA relate to MEQC. Section 203 of the CHIPRA establishes an error rate measurement with respect to the enrollment of children under the express lane eligibility option. The law directs States not to include children enrolled using the express lane eligibility option in data or samples used for purposes of complying with the MEQC requirements. Section 601 of the CHIPRA, among other things, requires a new final rule for the Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) program and aims to harmonize the PERM and MEQC programs and provides States with the option to apply PERM data resulting from its eligibility reviews for meeting MEQC requirements and vice versa, with certain conditions. We review, either directly or through its contractors, of the sampling plans helps to ensure States are using valid statistical methods for sample selection. The collection of information is also necessary to implement provisions from the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) (Pub. L. 111-3) with regard to the Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC) and Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) programs. Form Number: CMS-317 (OMB control number: 0938-0146); Frequency: Semi-Annually Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Governments; Number of Respondents: 10; Total Annual Responses: 20; Total Annual Hours: 480. (For policy questions regarding this collection contact Bridgett Rider at 410-786-2602.) 2. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently approved collection; Title of [[Page 20645]] Information Collection: State Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC) Sample Selection Lists; Use: The MEQC system is based on monthly State reviews of Medicaid and Medicaid expansion under Title XXI cases by States performing the traditional sampling process identified through statistically reliable statewide samples of cases selected from the eligibility files. These reviews are conducted to determine whether or not the sampled cases meet applicable State Title XIX or XXI eligibility requirements when applicable. The reviews are also used to assess beneficiary liability, if any, and to determine the amounts paid to provide Medicaid services for these cases. In the MEQC system, sampling is the only practical method of validating eligibility of the total caseload and determining the dollar value of eligibility liability errors. Any attempt to make such validations and determinations by reviewing every case would be an enormous and unwieldy undertaking. At the beginning of each month, State agencies still performing the traditional sample are required to submit sample selection lists which identify all of the cases selected for review in the States' samples. The sample selection lists contain identifying information on Medicaid beneficiaries such as: State agency review number, beneficiary's name and address, the name of the county where the beneficiary resides, Medicaid case number, etc. The submittal of the sample selection lists is necessary for Regional Office validation of State reviews. Without these lists, the integrity of the sampling results would be suspect and the Regional Offices would have no data on the adequacy of the States' monthly sample draw or review completion status. The authority for collecting this information is Section 1903(u) of the Social Security Act. The specific requirement for submitting sample selection lists is described in regulations at 42 CFR 431.814(h). Regional Office staff review the sample selection lists to determine that States are sampling a sufficient number of cases for review. Form Number: CMS-319 (OMB control number: 0938-0147); Frequency: Monthly; Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Governments; Number of Respondents: 10; Total Annual Responses: 120; Total Annual Hours: 960. (For policy questions regarding this collection contact Bridgett Rider at 410-786-2602.) 3. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Payment Error Rate Measurement in Medicaid & Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP); Use: The Improper Payments Information Act (IPIA) of 2002 as amended by the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Improvement Act (IPERIA) of 2012 requires CMS to produce national error rates for Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). To comply with the IPIA, CMS will engage a Federal contractor to produce the error rates in Medicaid and CHIP. The error rates for Medicaid and CHIP are calculated based on the reviews on three components of both Medicaid and CHIP program. They are: Fee-for-service claims medical reviews and data processing reviews, managed care claims data-processing reviews, and eligibility reviews. Each of the review components collects different types of information, and the state-specific error rates for each of the review components will be used to calculate an overall state-specific error rate, and the individual state-specific error rates will be used to produce a national error rate for Medicaid and CHIP. The states will be requested to submit, at their option, test data which include full claims details to the contractor prior to the quarterly submissions to detect potential problems in the dataset to and ensure the quality of the data. These states will be required to submit quarterly claims data to the contractor who will pull a statistically valid random sample, each quarter, by strata, so that medical and data processing reviews can be performed. State-specific error rates will be based on these review results. We need to collect the fee-for-service claims data, medical policies, and other information from states as well as medical records from providers in order for the contractor to sample and review adjudicated claims in those states selected for medical reviews and data processing reviews. Based on the reviews, state-specific error rates will be calculated which will serve as part of the basis for calculating national Medicaid and CHIP error rates. Form Number: CMS-10166 (OMB control number: 0938- 0974); Frequency: Annually, Quarterly; Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Governments; Number of Respondents: 34; Total Annual Responses: 34; Total Annual Hours: 56,100. (For policy questions regarding this collection contact Bridgett Rider at 410-786-2602.) 4. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance (CHIP) Managed Care Claims and Related Information; Use: The Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) program measures improper payments for Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). The program was designed to comply with the Improper Payments Information Act (IPIA) of 2002 and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance. Although OMB guidance requires error rate measurement for SCHIP, 2009 SCHIP legislation temporarily suspended PERM measurement for this program and changed to Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) effective April 01, 2009. See Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) Public Law 111-3 for more details. There are two phases of the PERM program, the measurement phase and the corrective action phase. The PERM measures improper payments in Medicaid and CHIP and produces State and national-level error rates for each program. The error rates are based on reviews of Medicaid and CHIP fee-for-service (FFS) and managed care payments made in the Federal fiscal year under review. States conduct eligibility reviews and report eligibility related payment error rates also used in the national error rate calculation. We created a 17 State rotation cycle so that each State will participate in PERM once every three years. Following is the list of States in which we will measure improper payments over the next three years in Medicaid. We need to collect capitation payment information from the selected States so that the federal contractor can draw a sample and review the managed care capitation payments. We will also collect State managed care contracts, rate schedules and updates to the contracts and rate schedules. This information will be used by the Federal contractor when conducting the managed care claims reviews. Sections 1902(a)(6) and 2107(b)(1) of the Social Security Act grants CMS authority to collect information from the States. The IPIA requires us to produce national error rates in Medicaid and CHIP fee-for- service, including the managed care component. The State-specific Medicaid managed care and CHIP managed care error rates will be based on reviews of managed care capitation payments in each program and will be used to produce national Medicaid managed care and CHIP managed care error rates. Form Number: CMS-10178 (OMB control number: 0938-0994); Frequency: Occasionally; Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Governments; Number of Respondents: 34; Total Annual [[Page 20646]] Responses: 28,050; Total Annual Hours: 28,050. (For policy questions regarding this collection contact Bridgett Rider at 410-786-2602.) 5. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Eligibility Error Rate Measurement in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program; Use: The Improper Payments Information Act (IPIA) of 2002 requires CMS to produce national error rates for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). To comply with the IPIA, CMS will use a national contracting strategy to produce error rates for Medicaid and CHIP fee-for-service and managed care improper payments. The federal contractor will review States on a rotational basis so that each State will be measured for improper payments, in each program, once and only once every three years. Subsequent to the first publication, we determined that we will measure Medicaid and CHIP in the same State. Therefore, States will measure Medicaid and CHIP eligibility in the same year measured for fee-for-service and managed care. We believe this approach will advantage States through economies of scale (e.g. administrative ease and shared staffing for both programs reviews). We also determined that interim case completion timeframes and reporting are critical to the integrity of the reviews and to keep the reviews on schedule to produce a timely error rate. Lastly, the sample sizes were increased slightly in order to produce an equal sample size per strata each month. Periodically, CMS will conduct Federal re-reviews of States' PERM files to ensure the accuracy of States' review findings and the validity of the review process. CMS will select a random subsample of Medicaid and CHIP cases from the sample selection lists provided by each State. States will submit all pertinent information related to the review of each sampled case that is selected by CMS. Form Number: CMS-10184 (OMB control number: 0938- 1012); Frequency: Annually, Quarterly Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Governments; Number of Respondents: 34; Total Annual Responses: 1,583; Total Annual Hours: 946,164. (For policy questions regarding this collection contact Bridgett Rider at 410-786-2602.) Dated: April 5, 2016. William N. Parham, III, Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs. [FR Doc. 2016-08106 Filed 4-7-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices 20643
that increase the probability of a patient National Library of Medicine, Office of reduce the burden on health care
safety event. the National Coordinator for Health providers and to facilitate data
AHRQ’s Common Formats for patient Information Technology, Office of transmission. These formats have two
safety event reporting include: Public Health and Science, and tiers, or data sets. The first tier, or
• Event descriptions (definitions of Substance Abuse and Mental Health national data set, contains elements that
patient safety events, near misses, and Services Administration—as well as the are collected for submission to the
unsafe conditions to be reported); DoD and VA. PSOPPC. The second tier, or local data
• Specifications for patient safety When developing Common Formats, set, is optional and is designed for use
aggregate reports and individual event AHRQ first reviews existing patient at the local level for additional analyses.
summaries that derive from event safety practices and event reporting This local data set is not meant for
descriptions; systems. In collaboration with the transmission to the PSOPPC.
• Delineation of data elements and PSWG and Federal subject matter The Agency is specifically interested
algorithms to be used for collection of experts, AHRQ drafts and releases beta in obtaining feedback from both the
adverse event data to populate the versions and updates to current versions private and public sectors on the
reports; and of the Common Formats for public updated Common Formats for Event
• Technical specifications for review and comment. The prior version Reporting—Hospitals Version 2.0. At
electronic data collection and reporting. of Common Formats for Event Reporting this time, only the event descriptions—
The technical specifications promote for Hospitals, Version 1.2, was released which define adverse events of interest
standardization of collected patient in April 2013. The PSWG assists AHRQ in the inpatient hospital setting—are
safety event information by specifying with assuring the consistency of available. Other elements of the
rules for data collection and submission, definitions/formats with those of Common Formats, including aggregate
as well as by providing guidance for relevant government agencies as reports and technical specifications,
how and when to create data elements, refinement of the Common Formats will be developed following revision of
their valid values, conditional and go-to continues. the Common Formats for Hospital
logic, and reports. These specifications Since the initial release of the Version 2.0 based on public comment
will ensure that data collected by PSOs Common Formats in August 2008, and NQF advice. Information on how to
and other entities have comparable AHRQ has regularly revised the formats comment and provide feedback on the
clinical meaning. They also provide based upon public comment. AHRQ Common Formats for Hospital Version
direction to software developers, so that solicits feedback on beta, and 2.0 is available at the NQF Web site:
the formats can be implemented subsequent, versions of Common http://www.qualityforum.org/Project_
electronically, and to PSOs, so that the Formats from private sector Pages/Common_Formats_for_Patient_
Common Formats can be submitted organizations and individuals. Based Safety_Data.aspx.
electronically to the PSO Privacy upon the feedback received, AHRQ
AHRQ appreciates the time and effort
Protection Center (PSOPPC) for data de- further revises the formats. To the extent
individuals invest in providing
identification and transmission to the practicable, the Common Formats are
comments. The Agency will review and
Network of Patient Safety Databases also aligned with World Health
consider all feedback received to help
(NPSD). Organization (WHO) concepts,
guide the development of a revised
frameworks, and definitions.
Common Formats Development Participation by the private sector in version. The process for updating and
In anticipation of the need for the development and subsequent refining the formats will continue to be
Common Formats, AHRQ began their revision of the Common Formats is an iterative one.
development by creating an inventory of achieved through working with the Further information on the Common
functioning private and public sector NQF. The Agency engages the NQF, a Formats can be obtained through
patient safety reporting systems. This non-profit organization focused on AHRQ’s PSO Web site: http://
inventory provided an evidence base to health care quality, to solicit comments www.pso.ahrq.gov/. To receive
inform construction of the Common and advice regarding proposed versions notifications about final versions of
Formats. The inventory included many of the Common Formats. AHRQ began AHRQ Common Formats, please
systems from the private sector, this process with the NQF in 2008, subscribe to ‘‘E-Mail Updates’’ at:
including prominent academic settings, receiving feedback on AHRQ’s 0.1 Beta https://pso.ahrq.gov/about/subscribe.
hospital systems, and international release of the Common Formats for Sharon B. Arnold,
reporting systems (e.g., from the United Event Reporting—Hospital. After Acting Director.
Kingdom and the Commonwealth of receiving public comment, the NQF [FR Doc. 2016–08021 Filed 4–7–16; 8:45 am]
Australia). In addition, virtually all solicits the review and advice of its BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
major Federal patient safety reporting Common Formats Expert Panel and
systems were included, such as those subsequently provides feedback to
from the Centers for Disease Control and AHRQ. The Agency then revises and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug refines the Common Formats and issues HUMAN SERVICES
Administration (FDA), the Department them as a production version. AHRQ
of Defense (DoD), and the Department of has continued to employ this process for Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Veterans Affairs (VA). all subsequent versions of the formats. Services
Since February 2005, AHRQ has
Commenting on Common Formats for [Document Identifier: CMS–317, CMS–319,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
convened the PSWG to assist AHRQ
with developing and maintaining the Event Reporting—Hospital Version 2.0 CMS–10166, CMS–10178, and CMS–10184]
Common Formats. The PSWG includes AHRQ used a tiered approach to Agency Information Collection
major health agencies within HHS— develop Hospital Version 2.0. This Activities: Proposed Collection;
CDC, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid approach was done in response to Comment Request
Services, FDA, Health Resources and feedback from PSOs and the public to
Services Administration, Indian Health decrease the number of questions for AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Service, National Institutes of Health, each module of the formats in order to Medicaid Services.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Apr 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_20711/page/1.svg)
![20646 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
Responses: 28,050; Total Annual Hours: re-reviews of States’ PERM files to Services (HHS) intends to collect data
28,050. (For policy questions regarding ensure the accuracy of States’ review on a third cohort of children and
this collection contact Bridgett Rider at findings and the validity of the review families for the National Survey of Child
410–786–2602.) process. CMS will select a random and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW).
5. Type of Information Collection subsample of Medicaid and CHIP cases NSCAW is the only source of nationally
Request: Extension of a currently from the sample selection lists provided representative, longitudinal, firsthand
approved collection; Title of by each State. States will submit all information about the functioning and
Information Collection: Eligibility Error pertinent information related to the well-being, service needs, and service
Rate Measurement in Medicaid and the review of each sampled case that is utilization of children and families who
Children’s Health Insurance Program; selected by CMS. Form Number: CMS– come to the attention of the child
Use: The Improper Payments 10184 (OMB control number: 0938– welfare system. The first two cohorts of
Information Act (IPIA) of 2002 requires 1012); Frequency: Annually, Quarterly NSCAW were collected beginning in
CMS to produce national error rates for Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 1999 and 2008 and studied children
Medicaid and the Children’s Health Governments; Number of Respondents: who had been the subject of
Insurance Program (CHIP). To comply 34; Total Annual Responses: 1,583; investigation by Child Protective
with the IPIA, CMS will use a national Total Annual Hours: 946,164. (For Services. Children were sampled from
contracting strategy to produce error policy questions regarding this child welfare agencies nationwide. The
rates for Medicaid and CHIP fee-for- collection contact Bridgett Rider at 410– proposed data collection plan for the
service and managed care improper 786–2602.) third cohort of NSCAW includes two
payments. The federal contractor will Dated: April 5, 2016. phases: Phase 1 includes child welfare
review States on a rotational basis so William N. Parham, III, agency recruitment and collection of
that each State will be measured for Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office files for sampling children, and Phase 2
improper payments, in each program, of Strategic Operations and Regulatory includes baseline data collection and an
once and only once every three years. Affairs. 18-month follow-up data collection. The
Subsequent to the first publication, we [FR Doc. 2016–08106 Filed 4–7–16; 8:45 am] current data collection plan calls for
determined that we will measure BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
selecting a new cohort of 4,565 children
Medicaid and CHIP in the same State. and families and repeating similar data
Therefore, States will measure Medicaid collection procedures as the previous
and CHIP eligibility in the same year DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND two cohorts. This Notice is specific to
measured for fee-for-service and HUMAN SERVICES Phase 1. The overall goal is to recruit
managed care. We believe this approach child welfare agencies in 83 primary
will advantage States through Administration for Children and sampling units nationwide. Child
economies of scale (e.g. administrative Families welfare agencies will be selected with
ease and shared staffing for both probability proportional to size, based
programs reviews). We also determined Proposed Information Collection on the current distributions in the child
that interim case completion timeframes Activity; Comment Request welfare system. Child welfare agency
and reporting are critical to the integrity Title: National Survey of Child and recruitment will include: mail, email,
of the reviews and to keep the reviews Adolescent Well-Being-Third Cohort phone calls, and site visits with child
on schedule to produce a timely error (NSCAW III): Agency Recruitment. welfare agency administrators.
rate. Lastly, the sample sizes were OMB No.: 0970–0202. Respondents: Child welfare agency
increased slightly in order to produce an Description: The Administration for administrators and other personnel.
equal sample size per strata each month. Children and Families (ACF) within the Data collection will take place over a 2-
Periodically, CMS will conduct Federal U.S. Department of Health and Human year period.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Annual Number of Average
Total number number of Annual burden
Instrument responses per burden hours
of respondents respondents hours
respondent per response
(rounded)
Information package for agency administrators .................. 83 42 1 .25 11
Initial visit or call with agency staff ...................................... 83 42 1 1 42
Visit or call with agency staff explaining the sample file
process ............................................................................. 83 42 1 2 84
Agency staff monthly sample file generation and trans-
mission ............................................................................. 83 42 15 1 630
Estimated Total Annual Burden Copies of the proposed collection of identified by the title of the information
Hours: 767. information can be obtained and collection.
In compliance with the requirements comments may be forwarded by writing The Department specifically requests
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the to the Administration for Children and comments on (a) whether the proposed
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Families, Office of Planning, Research collection of information is necessary
Administration for Children and and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW., for the proper performance of the
Families is soliciting public comment Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE functions of the agency, including
on the specific aspects of the Reports Clearance Officer. Email whether the information shall have
information collection described above. address: OPREinfocollection@ practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be agency’s estimate of the burden of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Apr 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_20711/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-07 13:50:23
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 13:50:23
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received by June 7, 2016. | |
| Contact | Reports Clearance Office at (410) 786- 1326. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 20643 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR