81 FR 21319 - Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Determination of No Shipments, In Part: 2014 Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 69 (April 11, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 69 (April 11, 2016)
| Page Range | 21319-21320 | |
| FR Document | 2016-08233 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 21319-21320] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-08233] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Determination of No Shipments, In Part: 2014 Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 14, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') published the preliminary results of the tenth administrative review (``AR'') of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (``WBF'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''), in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').\1\ The period of review (``POR'') is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. The AR covers 18 PRC exporters of subject merchandise, of which the Department selected one company for individual examination, Shanghai Jian Pu Import & Export Co., Ltd. (``Shanghai Jian Pu''). The Department invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received comments from the American Furniture Manufactures Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. (``Petitioners''). No other party commented. After consideration of Petitioners' comments, our final results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014, 80 FR 77321 (December 14, 2015) (``Preliminary Results''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2769. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background For a complete description of the events that followed the publication of the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum \2\ which is dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014 Administrative Review'' (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture, subject to certain exceptions.\3\ Imports of subject merchandise are classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) (``Order''). \4\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of the Comments Received The issues raised in Petitioners' case brief are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit of the main Department building, room B8024. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Separate Rates In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that seven companies under review, including Shanghai Jian Pu, the sole mandatory respondent, did not establish their eligibility for separate rate status and would be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity.\5\ We only received comments on the Preliminary Results from Petitioners, which agreed with our preliminary separate rates determination with respect to Shanghai Jian Pu and did not comment on any other entity under review. In these final results of review, we continue to determine that these seven companies should be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity because they have not established their separate rate eligibility. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity, we are not conducting a review of the PRC-wide entity.\6\ Thus, there is no change to the rate for the PRC-wide entity. The existing rate for the PRC-wide entity is 216.01 percent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Preliminary Results at 80 FR 7576. The six companies that did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate, other than Shanghai Jian Pu, are: (1) Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai; (2) Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., Coronal Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (3) Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony House Industries Co., Ltd.; (4) Orient International Holding Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; (5) Prime Wood International Co., Ltd, Prime Best International Co., Ltd., Prime Best Factory, Liang Huang (Jiaxing) Enterprise Co., Ltd.; and (6) Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd. \6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 4, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we determined that 11 companies subject to this AR had no shipments during the POR.\7\ We received no comments [[Page 21320]] concerning our finding of no shipments by these 11 companies. In these final results of review, we continue to determine that these 11 companies had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ The 11 companies with no shipments during the POR are: (1) Clearwise Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongguan Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3) Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (4) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (5) Golden Well International (HK) Ltd.; (6) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd.; (7) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (8) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (9) Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd.; (10) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.; and (11) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of these final results of review. We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate POR entries of subject merchandise from the seven companies, including Shanghai Jian Pu, which failed to establish their eligibility for separate rate status at the rate applicable to the PRC-wide entity. For the 11 companies which the Department determined had no shipments during the POR, all suspended entries under any of those companies' antidumping case numbers will be liquidated at the assessment rate for the PRC-wide entity.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date in the Federal Register of the final results of review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters which are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, including Shanghai Jian Pu and the six companies noted above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: April 1, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Treatment of Shanghai Jian Pu Import & Export Co. Ltd. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-08233 Filed 4-8-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2016 / Notices 21319
For purposes of this investigation, a remain unchanged from the Preliminary building, room B8024. In addition, a
covered product is of ‘‘iron’’ where the article Results. complete version of the Issues and
has a carbon content of 1.7 percent by weight Decision Memorandum can be accessed
DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2016.
or above, regardless of the presence and directly on the internet at http://
amount of additional alloying elements. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
The merchandise covered by this Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
investigation is currently classifiable under IV, Enforcement and Compliance, Issues and Decision Memorandum and
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United International Trade Administration, electronic version of the Issues and
States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 8483.30.8090, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Decision Memorandum are identical in
8483.50.6000, 8483.50.9040, 8483.50.9080, Street and Constitution Avenue NW., content.
8483.90.3000, 8483.90.8080. Covered
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) Separate Rates
merchandise may also enter under the
following HTSUS subheadings: 482–2769. In the Preliminary Results, the
7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7326.19.0010, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Department determined that seven
7326.19.0080, 8431.31.0040, 8431.31.0060, companies under review, including
8431.39.0010, 8431.39.0050, 8431.39.0070,
Background
Shanghai Jian Pu, the sole mandatory
8431.39.0080, and 8483.50.4000. These For a complete description of the respondent, did not establish their
HTSUS subheadings are provided for events that followed the publication of
convenience and customs purposes. The
eligibility for separate rate status and
the Preliminary Results, see the Issues would be treated as part of the PRC-
written description of the scope of the and Decision Memorandum 2 which is
investigation is dispositive. wide entity.5 We only received
dated concurrently with, and hereby comments on the Preliminary Results
[FR Doc. 2016–08235 Filed 4–8–16; 8:45 a.m.] adopted by, this notice. from Petitioners, which agreed with our
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Scope of the Order preliminary separate rates
determination with respect to Shanghai
The product covered by the order is Jian Pu and did not comment on any
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE wooden bedroom furniture, subject to other entity under review. In these final
certain exceptions.3 Imports of subject results of review, we continue to
International Trade Administration merchandise are classified under the determine that these seven companies
[A–570–890] Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the should be treated as part of the PRC-
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: wide entity because they have not
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, established their separate rate eligibility.
People’s Republic of China: Final 9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9041, Because no party requested a review of
Results and Final Determination of No 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, the PRC-wide entity, we are not
Shipments, In Part: 2014 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or conducting a review of the PRC-wide
Administrative Review 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS entity.6 Thus, there is no change to the
subheadings are provided for rate for the PRC-wide entity. The
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, convenience and customs purposes, the
International Trade Administration, existing rate for the PRC-wide entity is
written product description in the Order 216.01 percent.
Department of Commerce. remains dispositive.4
SUMMARY: On December 14, 2015, the Final Determination of No Shipments
Department of Commerce (the Analysis of the Comments Received
In the Preliminary Results, we
‘‘Department’’) published the The issues raised in Petitioners’ case determined that 11 companies subject to
preliminary results of the tenth brief are addressed in the Issues and this AR had no shipments during the
administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of the Decision Memorandum. A list of the POR.7 We received no comments
antidumping duty order on wooden issues addressed in the Issues and
bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) from the Decision Memorandum is appended to 5 See Preliminary Results at 80 FR 7576. The six
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), in this notice. The Issues and Decision companies that did not establish their eligibility for
accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) of Memorandum is a public document and a separate rate, other than Shanghai Jian Pu, are: (1)
Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai; (2) Dongguan
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the is on file electronically via Enforcement Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., Coronal
Act’’).1 The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is and Compliance’s Antidumping and Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (3) Hualing Furniture (China)
January 1, 2014, through December 31, Countervailing Duty Centralized Co., Ltd., Tony House Manufacture (China) Co.,
2014. The AR covers 18 PRC exporters Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’). Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony House
Industries Co., Ltd.; (4) Orient International Holding
of subject merchandise, of which the ACCESS is available to registered users Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; (5) Prime Wood
Department selected one company for at http://access.trade.gov and it is International Co., Ltd, Prime Best International Co.,
individual examination, Shanghai Jian available to all parties in the Central Ltd., Prime Best Factory, Liang Huang (Jiaxing)
Enterprise Co., Ltd.; and (6) Woodworth Wooden
Pu Import & Export Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Records Unit of the main Department Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.
Jian Pu’’). The Department invited 6 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
interested parties to comment on the 2 See the memorandum from Christian Marsh,
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Preliminary Results. We received Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
comments from the American Furniture Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
Manufactures Committee for Legal Compliance, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013).
Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision 7 The 11 companies with no shipments during the
Company, Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’). No other Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014 POR are: (1) Clearwise Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongguan
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Administrative Review’’ (‘‘Issues and Decision Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3) Dongguan
party commented. After consideration of Memorandum’’). Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (4) Eurosa (Kunshan)
Petitioners’ comments, our final results 3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (5)
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Golden Well International (HK) Ltd.; (6) Hangzhou
1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the Cadman Trading Co., Ltd.; (7) Rizhao Sanmu
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (8) Shenyang Shining
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014, 80 2005) (‘‘Order’’). Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (9) Wuxi Yushea
FR 77321 (December 14, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary 4 For a complete description of the scope of the Furniture Co., Ltd.; (10) Yeh Brothers World Trade
Results’’). Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:37 Apr 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_21388/page/1.svg)
![21320 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2016 / Notices
concerning our finding of no shipments exporter. These deposit requirements, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
by these 11 companies. In these final when imposed, shall remain in effect
results of review, we continue to until further notice. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
determine that these 11 companies had Administration
no shipments of subject merchandise Notification to Importers
RIN 0648–XE552
during the POR. This notice also serves as a final
Assessment Rates reminder to importers of their Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
responsibility under 19 CFR General Provisions for Domestic
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of Fishing Permits
Department has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) antidumping duties prior to liquidation AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
shall assess, antidumping duties on all of the relevant entries during this Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
appropriate entries of subject review period. Failure to comply with Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
merchandise in accordance with the this requirement could result in the Commerce.
final results of this review. The Department’s presumption that ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
Department intends to issue assessment reimbursement of antidumping duties
instructions to CBP 15 days after the occurred and the subsequent assessment SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional
publication date of these final results of of double antidumping duties. Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries,
review. We intend to instruct CBP to Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has
liquidate POR entries of subject Administrative Protective Order made a preliminary determination that
merchandise from the seven companies, an Exempted Fishing Permit application
including Shanghai Jian Pu, which This notice also serves as a reminder submitted by The Nature Conservancy
failed to establish their eligibility for to parties subject to administrative contains all of the required information
separate rate status at the rate applicable protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their and warrants further consideration. This
to the PRC-wide entity. For the 11 responsibility concerning the return or Exempted Fishing Permit would allow
companies which the Department destruction of proprietary information participants to use electronic
determined had no shipments during disclosed under the APO in accordance monitoring systems in lieu of at-sea
the POR, all suspended entries under with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which monitors in support of a study to
any of those companies’ antidumping continues to govern business develop electronic monitoring for the
case numbers will be liquidated at the proprietary information in this segment purposes of catch monitoring in the
assessment rate for the PRC-wide of the proceeding. Timely written groundfish fishery.
entity.8 notification of the return/destruction of Regulations under the Magnuson-
Cash Deposit Requirements APO materials or conversion to judicial Stevens Fishery Conservation and
protective order is hereby requested. Management Act require publication of
The following cash deposit Failure to comply with the regulations this notification to provide interested
requirements will be effective upon and terms of an APO is a violation parties the opportunity to comment on
publication of the final results of this applications for proposed Exempted
which is subject to sanction.
review for shipments of the subject Fishing Permits.
merchandise from the PRC entered, or These final results of review are
DATES: Comments must be received on
withdrawn from warehouse, for issued and published in accordance
or before April 26, 2016.
consumption on or after the publication with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
date in the Federal Register of the final Act and 19 CFR 351.213. ADDRESSES: You may submit written
results of review, as provided by section comments by any of the following
Dated: April 1, 2016. methods:
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously investigated or reviewed PRC Paul Piquado, • Email: nmfs.gar.efp@noaa.gov.
and non-PRC exporters which are not Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Include in the subject line ‘‘TNC EM
under review in this segment of the Compliance. EFP.’’
proceeding but which have separate • Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional
Appendix Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue
to be the existing exporter-specific rate; Summary Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
(2) for all PRC exporters of subject Background Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
merchandise that have not been found Scope of the Order Mark the outside of the envelope ‘‘TNC
to be entitled to a separate rate, Discussion of the Issues EM EFP.’’
including Shanghai Jian Pu and the six Comment 1: Treatment of Shanghai Jian Pu FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
companies noted above, the cash Import & Export Co. Ltd. Brett Alger, Groundfish Sector Policy
deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC- Recommendation Analyst, 978–675–2153.
wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; (3) [FR Doc. 2016–08233 Filed 4–8–16; 8:45 am] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2010,
for all non-PRC exporters of subject BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P NMFS implemented Amendment 16 to
merchandise which have not received the Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will Management Plan (FMP), which revised
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
be the rate applicable to the PRC and expanded the sector management
exporter that supplied that non-PRC system and established annual catch
limits and accountability measures for
Inc.; and (11) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & each stock in the fishery. In order to
Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. reliably estimate sector catch and
8 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
monitor sector operations, Amendment
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 16 included new requirements for
(October 24, 2011). groundfish sectors to implement and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:37 Apr 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_21388/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-04-09 00:11:03
Document Modified: 2016-04-09 00:11:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2769. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 21319 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR