81 FR 22544 - Special Local Regulation, Daytona Beach Grand Prix of the Seas; Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 74 (April 18, 2016)

Page Range		22544-22546
FR Document		2016-08875

The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation on the waters of the Atlantic Ocean east of Daytona Beach, Florida during the Daytona Beach Grand Prix of the Seas, a series of high-speed personal watercraft boat races. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters surrounding the event. This special local regulation will be enforced daily 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., from April 22 through April 24, 2016. This rulemaking prohibits persons and vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 74 (Monday, April 18, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22544-22546]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2015-1108]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation, Daytona Beach Grand Prix of the Seas; 
Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation on 
the waters of the Atlantic Ocean east of Daytona Beach, Florida during 
the Daytona Beach Grand Prix of the Seas, a series of high-speed 
personal watercraft boat races. This action is necessary to provide for 
the safety of life on the navigable waters surrounding the event. This 
special local regulation will be enforced daily 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., from 
April 22 through April 24, 2016. This rulemaking prohibits persons and 
vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from April 22, 2016 through April 24, 
2016 and will be enforced daily from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-1108 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Allan Storm, Sector Jacksonville, 
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 904-714-
7616, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On December 7, 2015, Powerboat P1-USA, LLC notified the Coast Guard 
that it will conduct a series of high speed boat races in the Atlantic 
Ocean, offshore from Daytona Beach, FL from April 22 through 24, 2016. 
In response, on February 4, 2016, the Coast Guard published a notice of 
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Special Local Regulation, Daytona 
Beach Grand Prix of the Seas; Daytona Beach, FL (81 FR 5967). There we 
stated why we issued the NPRM and invited comments on our proposed 
regulatory action related to this boat race. During the comment period 
that ended March 7, 2016, we received 3 comments.
    Under good cause provisions in 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), we are making 
this rule effective less than 30 days after its publication in the 
Federal Register. The Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for 
making this rule effective starting April 22, 2016 because the public 
was notified of this event well in advance through a proposed rule to 
regulate waterway activities published on February 4, 2016 [81 FR 
5967]. Designated representatives will be on scene to assist the public 
with compliance during the nine hours per day that the regulation will 
be enforced.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1233. The COTP Jacksonville determined that potential hazards 
associated with high speed boat races necessitate the establishment of 
a special local

[[Page 22545]]

regulation. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of 
life on the navigable waters of the United States by prohibiting all 
vessels and persons not participating in the event from entering the 
regulated area.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received three comments on the NPRM published 
February 4, 2016. Two comments received were in support of the rule. 
The third comment received was opposed to the rule. The comment opposed 
to the rule disputed the following items: (1) The Coast Guard's 
position that this high speed boat race poses an extra hazard to the 
safety of life on the navigable waters surrounding the event, (2) the 
need to establish a special local regulation to mitigate the hazards 
associated with this event, (3) the need for Coast Guard presence to 
enforce the rule (due to monetary cost to taxpayers), and (4) the 
determination that this rule is not a ``significant regulatory 
action.'' In regard to significant regulatory action, the commenter 
stated that this rule ``encroaches on rights of mariners to be in a 
public area.''
    A marine event is defined as an organized event of limited duration 
on the navigable waters of the United States conducted according to a 
prearranged schedule which presents an extra or unusual hazard to the 
safety of human life that cannot be protected by existing navigation. 
Prior to taking any regulatory action and to considering the 
establishment of a special local regulation, the Coast Guard utilizes a 
risk-informed decision making process to determine if an event meets 
the definition of a marine event as outlined in 33 CFR 100.05 and is 
likely to introduce an extra or unusual hazard to the safety of human 
life. The primary risk factors for determining that this is a marine 
event included: (1) The expected involvement of an unusually large 
concentration of traffic on the water that may interfere with routine 
navigation and (2) the event includes an inherently hazardous 
competition where craft are expected to travel at high speeds. Once the 
Coast Guard made the marine event determination, we proposed a safety 
risk-mitigation tool. In this case, it is the establishment of a 
special local regulation. Based on an analysis of the factors addressed 
above, the commenter's position that this race is not a marine event 
justifying Coast Guard action is not supportable.
    For the enforcement of this rule, the Coast Guard does not need to 
be on scene. As stated in the regulatory text at the end of this 
document, the COTP may utilize Federal, state, and local officers 
(designated representatives) for the enforcement of the regulated area.
    A ``significant regulation'' under Executive Order 12866, is one 
that has an impact on the economy of more than $100 million or one that 
adversely affects in a material way the economy or a sector of the 
economy; creates a serious inconsistency or interferes with another 
agency; materially alters the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of 
recipients; or raises a novel issue of law or policy. For the reasons 
stated in section V.A below, the Coast Guard determines that this rule 
is not a significant regulatory action. It is one of a category of 
regulations considered ``routine and frequent'' by the Office of 
Management and Budget.
    This rule establishes a special local regulation for the Daytona 
Beach Grand Prix of the Seas, a series of high-speed personal 
watercraft boat races. The regulated area includes the waters of the 
Atlantic Ocean offshore from Daytona Beach, Florida and will be 
enforced daily 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., from April 22 through April 24, 2016. 
Approximately 90 high-speed personal watercraft are anticipated to 
participate in the races. The regulated area would encompass an 
approximated offshore area that is 1,350 yards wide extending 600 yards 
south of the Daytona Beach pier to 1,900 yards north of the pier. No 
vessel or person will be permitted to enter the regulated area without 
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    The Coast Guard has determined that this temporary final rule is 
not a significant regulatory action for the following reasons: (1) The 
special local regulation would be enforced for a total of only 27 hours 
over the course of three days; (2) although persons and vessels would 
not be able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the 
regulated area without authorization from the COTP Jacksonville or a 
designated representative, they would be able to operate in the 
surrounding area during the enforcement period; (3) persons and vessels 
would still be able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain 
within the regulated area if authorized by the COTP Jacksonville or a 
designated representative; and (4) the Coast Guard would provide 
advance notification of the special local regulation to the local 
maritime community via Broadcast Notice to Mariners or by on-scene 
designated representative.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture

[[Page 22546]]

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business 
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions 
annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If 
you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-
888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate 
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a special local regulation that would prohibit persons 
and vessels from transiting through a 2,500 yard by 1,350 yard 
regulated area during a three day racing event lasting nine hours 
daily. It is categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraphs 34(h) and 35(a) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. 
An environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a 
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. Add Sec.  100.35T07-1108 to read as follows:


Sec.  100.35T07-1108  Special Local Regulation, Daytona Beach Grand 
Prix of the Seas; Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL.

    (a) Regulated area. The following regulated area is a special local 
regulation located offshore from Daytona Beach, FL. All waters of the 
Atlantic Ocean encompassed within the following points: Starting at 
Point 1 in position 29[deg]14.580' N., 081[deg]00.820' W.; thence 
northeast to Point 2 in position 29[deg]14.783' N., 081[deg]00.101' W.; 
thence southeast to Point 3 in position 29[deg]13.646' N., 
080[deg]59.549' W.; thence southwest to Point 4 in position 
29[deg]13.434' N., 081[deg]00.224' W.; thence northwest back to origin. 
These coordinates are based on North American Datum 1983.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast 
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty 
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and 
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville in the enforcement of the 
regulated area.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from 
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the 
regulated area unless authorized by the COTP Jacksonville or a 
designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor 
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the COTP 
Jacksonville by telephone at 904-714-7557, or a designated 
representative via VHF-FM radio on channel 16 to request authorization. 
If authorization is granted, all persons and vessels receiving such 
authorization must comply with the instructions of the COTP 
Jacksonville or designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area 
through Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF--FM channel 16 or by on-
scene designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced daily 8 a.m. 
to 5 p.m. from April 22 through April 24, 2016.

    Dated: April 12, 2016.
 J.F. Dixon,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2016-08875 Filed 4-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 22545

regulation. The purpose of this may utilize Federal, state, and local The Coast Guard has determined that
rulemaking is to ensure the safety of life officers (designated representatives) for this temporary final rule is not a
on the navigable waters of the United the enforcement of the regulated area. significant regulatory action for the
States by prohibiting all vessels and A ‘‘significant regulation’’ under following reasons: (1) The special local
persons not participating in the event Executive Order 12866, is one that has regulation would be enforced for a total
from entering the regulated area. an impact on the economy of more than of only 27 hours over the course of three
$100 million or one that adversely days; (2) although persons and vessels
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, affects in a material way the economy or would not be able to enter, transit
and the Rule a sector of the economy; creates a through, anchor in, or remain within the
As noted above, we received three serious inconsistency or interferes with regulated area without authorization
comments on the NPRM published another agency; materially alters the from the COTP Jacksonville or a
February 4, 2016. Two comments budgetary impact of entitlements, designated representative, they would
received were in support of the rule. grants, user fees, or loan programs, or be able to operate in the surrounding
The third comment received was the rights and obligations of recipients; area during the enforcement period; (3)
opposed to the rule. The comment or raises a novel issue of law or policy. persons and vessels would still be able
opposed to the rule disputed the For the reasons stated in section V.A to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
following items: (1) The Coast Guard’s below, the Coast Guard determines that remain within the regulated area if
position that this high speed boat race this rule is not a significant regulatory authorized by the COTP Jacksonville or
poses an extra hazard to the safety of life action. It is one of a category of a designated representative; and (4) the
on the navigable waters surrounding the regulations considered ‘‘routine and Coast Guard would provide advance
event, (2) the need to establish a special frequent’’ by the Office of Management notification of the special local
local regulation to mitigate the hazards and Budget. regulation to the local maritime
associated with this event, (3) the need This rule establishes a special local community via Broadcast Notice to
for Coast Guard presence to enforce the regulation for the Daytona Beach Grand Mariners or by on-scene designated
rule (due to monetary cost to taxpayers), Prix of the Seas, a series of high-speed representative.
and (4) the determination that this rule personal watercraft boat races. The
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action.’’ regulated area includes the waters of the B. Impact on Small Entities
In regard to significant regulatory Atlantic Ocean offshore from Daytona The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
action, the commenter stated that this Beach, Florida and will be enforced 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
rule ‘‘encroaches on rights of mariners daily 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., from April 22 requires Federal agencies to consider
to be in a public area.’’ through April 24, 2016. Approximately the potential impact of regulations on
A marine event is defined as an 90 high-speed personal watercraft are small entities during rulemaking. The
organized event of limited duration on anticipated to participate in the races. term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
the navigable waters of the United The regulated area would encompass an businesses, not-for-profit organizations
States conducted according to a approximated offshore area that is 1,350 that are independently owned and
prearranged schedule which presents an yards wide extending 600 yards south of operated and are not dominant in their
extra or unusual hazard to the safety of the Daytona Beach pier to 1,900 yards fields, and governmental jurisdictions
human life that cannot be protected by north of the pier. No vessel or person with populations of less than 50,000.
existing navigation. Prior to taking any will be permitted to enter the regulated The Coast Guard received no comments
regulatory action and to considering the area without obtaining permission from from the Small Business Administration
establishment of a special local the COTP or a designated on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
regulation, the Coast Guard utilizes a representative. certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
risk-informed decision making process rule will not have a significant
to determine if an event meets the V. Regulatory Analyses economic impact on a substantial
definition of a marine event as outlined We developed this rule after number of small entities.
in 33 CFR 100.05 and is likely to considering numerous statutes and While some owners or operators of
introduce an extra or unusual hazard to Executive orders related to rulemaking. vessels intending to transit the regulated
the safety of human life. The primary Below we summarize our analyses area may be small entities, for the
risk factors for determining that this is based on a number of these statutes and reasons stated in section V.A above, this
a marine event included: (1) The Executive orders, and we discuss First rule will not have a significant
expected involvement of an unusually Amendment rights of protestors. economic impact on any vessel owner
large concentration of traffic on the or operator.
water that may interfere with routine A. Regulatory Planning and Review Under section 213(a) of the Small
navigation and (2) the event includes an Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Business Regulatory Enforcement
inherently hazardous competition direct agencies to assess the costs and Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
where craft are expected to travel at benefits of available regulatory we want to assist small entities in
high speeds. Once the Coast Guard alternatives and, if regulation is understanding this rule. If the rule
made the marine event determination, necessary, to select regulatory would affect your small business,
we proposed a safety risk-mitigation approaches that maximize net benefits. organization, or governmental
tool. In this case, it is the establishment Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the jurisdiction and you have questions
of a special local regulation. Based on importance of quantifying both costs concerning its provisions or options for
an analysis of the factors addressed and benefits, of reducing costs, of compliance, please contact the person
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

above, the commenter’s position that harmonizing rules, and of promoting listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
this race is not a marine event justifying flexibility. This rule has not been CONTACT section.
Coast Guard action is not supportable. designated a ‘‘significant regulatory Small businesses may send comments
For the enforcement of this rule, the action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. on the actions of Federal employees
Coast Guard does not need to be on Accordingly, it has not been reviewed who enforce, or otherwise determine
scene. As stated in the regulatory text at by the Office of Management and compliance with, Federal regulations to
the end of this document, the COTP Budget. the Small Business and Agriculture

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 Apr 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM 18APR1

22546 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Management Directive 023–01 and 29°14.783′ N., 081°00.101′ W.; thence
and the Regional Small Business Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, southeast to Point 3 in position
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The which guide the Coast Guard in 29°13.646′ N., 080°59.549′ W.; thence
Ombudsman evaluates these actions complying with the National southwest to Point 4 in position
annually and rates each agency’s Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 29°13.434′ N., 081°00.224′ W.; thence
responsiveness to small business. If you U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have northwest back to origin. These
wish to comment on actions by determined that this action is one of a coordinates are based on North
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– category of actions that do not American Datum 1983.
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The individually or cumulatively have a (b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
Coast Guard will not retaliate against significant effect on the human representative’’ means Coast Guard
small entities that question or complain environment. This rule involves a Patrol Commanders, including Coast
about this rule or any policy or action special local regulation that would Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
of the Coast Guard. prohibit persons and vessels from other officers operating Coast Guard
transiting through a 2,500 yard by 1,350 vessels, and Federal, state, and local
C. Collection of Information officers designated by or assisting the
yard regulated area during a three day
This rule will not call for a new racing event lasting nine hours daily. It Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville
collection of information under the is categorically excluded from further in the enforcement of the regulated area.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 review under paragraphs 34(h) and 35(a) (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
U.S.C. 3501–3520). of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant vessels are prohibited from entering,
Instruction. An environmental analysis transiting through, anchoring in, or
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
checklist supporting this determination remaining within the regulated area
Governments
and a Categorical Exclusion unless authorized by the COTP
A rule has implications for federalism Determination are available in the Jacksonville or a designated
under Executive Order 13132, docket where indicated under representative.
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or (2) Persons and vessels desiring to
effect on the States, on the relationship information that may lead to the enter, transit through, anchor in, or
between the national government and discovery of a significant environmental remain within the regulated area may
the States, or on the distribution of impact from this rule. contact the COTP Jacksonville by
power and responsibilities among the telephone at 904–714–7557, or a
various levels of government. We have G. Protest Activities designated representative via VHF–FM
analyzed this rule under that Order and The Coast Guard respects the First radio on channel 16 to request
have determined that it is consistent Amendment rights of protesters. authorization. If authorization is
with the fundamental federalism Protesters are asked to contact the granted, all persons and vessels
principles and preemption requirements person listed in the FOR FURTHER receiving such authorization must
described in Executive Order 13132. INFORMATION CONTACT section to comply with the instructions of the
Also, this rule does not have tribal coordinate protest activities so that your COTP Jacksonville or designated
implications under Executive Order message can be received without representative.
13175, Consultation and Coordination jeopardizing the safety or security of (3) The Coast Guard will provide
with Indian Tribal Governments, people, places or vessels. notice of the regulated area through
because it does not have a substantial Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF—
direct effect on one or more Indian List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 FM channel 16 or by on-scene
tribes, on the relationship between the Marine safety, Navigation (water), designated representatives.
Federal Government and Indian tribes, Reporting and recordkeeping (d) Enforcement period. This section
or on the distribution of power and requirements, Waterways. will be enforced daily 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
responsibilities between the Federal For the reasons discussed in the from April 22 through April 24, 2016.
Government and Indian tribes. If you preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 Dated: April 12, 2016.
believe this rule has implications for CFR part 100 as follows: J.F. Dixon,
federalism or Indian tribes, please
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
contact the person listed in the FOR PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON Port Jacksonville.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. NAVIGABLE WATERS [FR Doc. 2016–08875 Filed 4–15–16; 8:45 am]
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ■ 1. The authority citation for part 100 BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act continues to read as follows:
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
Federal agencies to assess the effects of DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
■ 2. Add § 100.35T07–1108 to read as SECURITY
their discretionary regulatory actions. In follows:
particular, the Act addresses actions Coast Guard
that may result in the expenditure by a § 100.35T07–1108 Special Local
State, local, or tribal government, in the Regulation, Daytona Beach Grand Prix of
the Seas; Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, 33 CFR Part 117
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or FL. [Docket No. USCG–2016–0295]
more in any one year. Though this rule (a) Regulated area. The following
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

will not result in such an expenditure, regulated area is a special local Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isle
we do discuss the effects of this rule regulation located offshore from of Wight (Sinepatuxent) Bay, Ocean
elsewhere in this preamble. Daytona Beach, FL. All waters of the City, MD
Atlantic Ocean encompassed within the AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
F. Environment following points: Starting at Point 1 in
ACTION:Notice of deviation from
We have analyzed this rule under position 29°14.580′ N., 081°00.820′ W.;
drawbridge regulation.
Department of Homeland Security thence northeast to Point 2 in position

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 Apr 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM 18APR1

Document Created: 2016-04-16 01:45:28
Document Modified: 2016-04-16 01:45:28

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from April 22, 2016 through April 24, 2016 and will be enforced daily from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Contact		If you have questions about this rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Allan Storm, Sector Jacksonville, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 904-714- 7616, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 22544
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways

81 FR 22544 - Special Local Regulation, Daytona Beach Grand Prix of the Seas; Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 74 (April 18, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard