81 FR 22633 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 74 (April 18, 2016)
Antitrust Division
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 74 (April 18, 2016)
| Page Range | 22633-22634 | |
| FR Document | 2016-08804 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 22633-22634] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-08804] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on March 23, 2015, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Arista Networks, Santa Clara, CA; Cisco International Limited, Feltham, UNITED KINGDOM; Coveloz Technologies, Inc., Kanata, CANADA; Masstech Innovations, Markham, Ontario, CANADA; Iain Collins (individual member), London, UNITED KINGDOM; Gabor Forgacs (individual member), Budapest, HUNGARY; Laurance Hughes [[Page 22634]] (individual member), Sydney, AUSTRALIA; Douglas McGee (individual member), Columbus, OH; and Nick Ryan (individual member), London, UNITED KINGDOM, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Ad-ID, New York, NY; CNN/Turner Broadcasting System, Atlanta, GA; Masstech Group, Inc., Markham, Ontario, CANADA; Video Stream Networks (VSN), Barcelona, SPAIN; and SDVI Corporation, Menlo Park, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127). The last notification was filed with the Department on December 23, 2015. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on January 22, 2016 (81 FR 3823). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2016-08804 Filed 4-15-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2016 / Notices 22633
Commission determined not to review will be set forth more fully in a Nederland, Heerlen, THE
Order No. 82. Notice (Aug. 26, 2015). forthcoming opinion. NETHERLANDS; D.E. Solution sprl,
On October 27, 2015, in response to In light of its determination above, the Brussels, BELGIUM; Poway Unified
the issuance of an ID (Order No. 106), Commission has determined not to School District, Poway, CA; American
which terminated the investigation review Order No. 83, which denied as Institutes for Research, Washington, DC;
before the ALJ, Dentons US filed a untimely a motion of Dentons US and University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport,
petition for Commission review of Order Revolaze for reconsideration of Order CT; and Gutenberg Technology,
Nos. 43 and 83. See 19 CFR 210.24 No. 43 or for interlocutory review by the Cambridge, MA, have withdrawn as
(rulings by the ALJ ‘‘on motions may not Commission. parties to this venture.
be appealed to the Commission prior to The Commission notes that in April No other changes have been made in
the administrative law judge’s issuance 2016, it received several submissions either the membership or planned
of an initial determination’’). On from RevoLaze and Dentons US after the activity of the group research project.
November 3, 2015, and November 9, deadlines for submissions set forth in 19 Membership in this group research
2015, the Office of Unfair Import CFR 210.43 had passed. The project remains open, and IMS Global
Investigations and Gap, respectively, Commission rejects these submissions intends to file additional written
opposed Dentons’ petition. as untimely and procedurally improper, notifications disclosing all changes in
The Commission has determined to and did not consider them in making its membership.
review Order No. 43, and, on review, determination. On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its
has determined to vacate the The authority for the Commission’s original notification pursuant to section
disqualification decision as moot. In determination is contained in section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of
view of the final disposition of the 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Justice published a notice in the Federal
investigation as to all respondents, the amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
issue of Dentons US’s disqualification 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR
has no practical effect on this Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 55283).
investigation. 210). The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 29, 2015.
Although the Commission has the Issued: April 12, 2016. A notice was published in the Federal
discretion to address issues that have By order of the Commission. Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
become moot, it has determined not to Lisa R. Barton, Act on January 22, 2016 (81 FR 3820).
do so here. The disqualification in this
Secretary to the Commission.
investigation turns on whether Dentons Patricia A. Brink,
[FR Doc. 2016–08845 Filed 4–15–16; 8:45 am]
US and Dentons Canada LLP as Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
members of Salans FMC Denton Group Division.
(‘‘Dentons Verein’’) should be treated as [FR Doc. 2016–08803 Filed 4–15–16; 8:45 am]
a single law firm under the American BILLING CODE P
Bar Association’s Model Rules of DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Professional Conduct (‘‘Model Rules’’)
in this investigation. Answering that Antitrust Division DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
question would require further
Notice Pursuant to the National Antitrust Division
proceedings, and potentially additional
Cooperative Research and Production
factfinding. In particular, Comment 2 to
Act of 1993—IMS Global Learning Notice Pursuant to the National
Model Rule 1.0 sets forth several factors
Consortium, Inc. Cooperative Research and Production
to consider in determining whether a
Act of 1993—Advanced Media
group of lawyers constitute a law firm, Notice is hereby given that, on March
Workflow Association, Inc.
including (1) how the lawyers present 18, 2016, pursuant to section 6(a) of the
themselves to the public, (2) whether National Cooperative Research and Notice is hereby given that, on March
the lawyers conduct themselves as a law Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 23, 2015, pursuant to section 6(a) of the
firm, (3) the terms of any formal et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), IMS Global Learning National Cooperative Research and
agreement among the lawyers, and (4) Consortium, Inc. (‘‘IMS Global’’) has Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
whether the lawyers have mutual access filed written notifications et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Advanced Media
to client information. Here, the record simultaneously with the Attorney Workflow Association, Inc. has filed
lacks sufficient evidence on these General and the Federal Trade written notifications simultaneously
factors, especially as to the third factor, Commission disclosing changes in its with the Attorney General and the
because the Dentons Verein membership. The notifications were Federal Trade Commission disclosing
organizational agreements have not been filed for the purpose of extending the changes in its membership. The
made part of the record of the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of notifications were filed for the purpose
investigation. The Commission has antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages of extending the Act’s provisions
decided that the added delay, burdens, under specified circumstances. limiting the recovery of antitrust
and expenses that would be incurred by Specifically, Baltimore County Public plaintiffs to actual damages under
the parties and the Commission in Schools, Baltimore, MD; Broward specified circumstances. Specifically,
resolving these issues are unjustified Community College, Fort Lauderdale, Arista Networks, Santa Clara, CA; Cisco
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
given the termination of the FL; explorance, Montreal, Quebec, International Limited, Feltham, UNITED
investigation as to all respondents. CANADA; its learning, Bergen, KINGDOM; Coveloz Technologies, Inc.,
Accordingly, the Commission has NORWAY; Katy Independent School Kanata, CANADA; Masstech
determined to review and vacate Order District, Katy, TX; and Purdue Innovations, Markham, Ontario,
No. 43, without deciding whether the University, West Lafayette, IN, have CANADA; Iain Collins (individual
disqualification in this investigation been added as parties to this venture. member), London, UNITED KINGDOM;
was appropriate. The reasoning in Also, EUN Partnership AISBL, Gabor Forgacs (individual member),
support of the Commission’s decision Brussels, BELGIUM; Open Universiteit Budapest, HUNGARY; Laurance Hughes
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:54 Apr 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_22707/page/1.svg)
![22634 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2016 / Notices
(individual member), Sydney, in the Federal Register on December 10, Dated: April 11, 2016.
AUSTRALIA; Douglas McGee 2015, 80 FR 76709, Cody Laboratories, Louis J. Milione,
(individual member), Columbus, OH; Inc., 601 Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, Deputy Assistant Administrator.
and Nick Ryan (individual member), Wyoming 82414 applied to be registered [FR Doc. 2016–08843 Filed 4–15–16; 8:45 am]
London, UNITED KINGDOM, have been as a manufacturer of certain basic BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
added as parties to this venture. classes of controlled substances. No
Also, Ad-ID, New York, NY; CNN/ comments or objections were submitted
Turner Broadcasting System, Atlanta, for this notice. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
GA; Masstech Group, Inc., Markham, The DEA has considered the factors in
Ontario, CANADA; Video Stream 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that Drug Enforcement Administration
Networks (VSN), Barcelona, SPAIN; and the registration of Cody Laboratories,
SDVI Corporation, Menlo Park, CA, Inc. to manufacture the basic classes of [Docket No. DEA–392]
have withdrawn as parties to this controlled substances is consistent with
venture. the public interest and with United Importer of Controlled Substances
No other changes have been made in States obligations under international Registration: Research Triangle
either the membership or planned treaties, conventions, or protocols in Institute
activity of the group research project. effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA
Membership in this group research investigated the company’s maintenance ACTION: Notice of registration.
project remains open, and Advanced of effective controls against diversion by
Media Workflow Association, Inc. inspecting and testing the company’s SUMMARY: Research Triangle Institute
intends to file additional written physical security systems, verifying the applied to be registered as an importer
notifications disclosing all changes in company’s compliance with state and of certain basic classes of controlled
membership. local laws, and reviewing the company’s
On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media substances. The Drug Enforcement
background and history. Administration (DEA) grants Research
Workflow Association, Inc. filed its Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
original notification pursuant to section Triangle Institute registration as an
823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR importer of those controlled substances.
6(a) of the Act. The Department of 1301.33, the above-named company is
Justice published a notice in the Federal granted registration as a bulk SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the manufacturer of the following basic dated July 29, 2015, and published in
Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127). classes of controlled substances: the Federal Register on August 4, 2015,
The last notification was filed with 80 FR 46330, Research Triangle
the Department on December 23, 2015. Controlled substance Schedule Institute, Kenneth S. Rehder, Hermann
A notice was published in the Federal Building East Institute Drive, Room 106,
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Dihydromorphine (9145) ............... I Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Act on January 22, 2016 (81 FR 3823). Amphetamine (1100) .................... II 27709–2194 applied to be registered as
Methamphetamine (1105) ............ II
Patricia A. Brink, Methylphenidate (1724) ................ II
an importer of certain basic classes of
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Amobarbital (2125) ....................... II controlled substances. No comments or
Division. Pentobarbital (2270) ..................... II objections were submitted for this
[FR Doc. 2016–08804 Filed 4–15–16; 8:45 am] Secobarbital (2315) ...................... II notice.
BILLING CODE P
4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine II The DEA has considered the factors in
(ANPP) (8333).
21 U.S.C. 823, 952(a) and 958(a) and
Phenylacetone (8501) .................. II
Cocaine (9041) ............................. II determined that the registration of
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Codeine (9050) ............................. II Research Triangle Institute to import the
Dihydrocodeine (9120) ................. II basic classes of controlled substances is
Drug Enforcement Administration Oxycodone (9143) ........................ II consistent with the public interest and
[Docket No. DEA–392] Hydromorphone (9150) ................ II with United States obligations under
Diphenoxylate (9170) ................... II international treaties, conventions, or
Manufacturer of Controlled Ecgonine (9180) ........................... II protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The
Substances Registration: Cody Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... II DEA investigated the company’s
Laboratories, Inc. Meperidine (9230) ........................ II
Methadone (9250) ........................ II maintenance of effective controls
Methadone intermediate (9254) ... II against diversion by inspecting and
ACTION: Notice of registration. testing the company’s physical security
Morphine (9300) ........................... II
SUMMARY: Cody Laboratories, Inc. Thebaine (9333) ........................... II systems, verifying the company’s
applied to be registered as a Oxymorphone (9652) ................... II compliance with state and local laws,
manufacturer of certain basic classes of Alfentanil (9737) ........................... II and reviewing the company’s
Remifentanil (9739) ...................... II background and history.
controlled substances. The Drug Sufentanil (9740) .......................... II
Enforcement Administration (DEA) Tapentadol (9780) ........................ II Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
grants Cody Laboratories, Inc. Fentanyl (9801) ............................ II 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance
registration as a manufacturer of those with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above-named
controlled substances. The company plans to manufacture company is granted registration as an
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice the listed controlled substances in bulk importer of the following basic classes
dated December 4, 2015, and published for sale to its customers. of controlled substances:
Controlled substance Schedule
AB–PINACA (N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide) (7023) ................................................... I
AB–CHMINACA (N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (7031) ......................... I
AM–2201 (1-(5-Fluoropentyl)-3-(1-naphthoyl) indole) (7201) ............................................................................................................. I
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:54 Apr 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_22707/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-04-16 01:45:35
Document Modified: 2016-04-16 01:45:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 22633 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR