81 FR 23223 - Special Local Regulation; Lake of the Ozarks, Lakeside, MO

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 76 (April 20, 2016)

Page Range		23223-23225
FR Document		2016-09096

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local regulation for certain waters of the Lake of the Ozarks. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Lakeside, MO, during a powerboat race on June 4, 2016. This proposed rulemaking would designate prohibited areas for the race course and associated safety buffer, spectator areas, and location for vessels to transit during the race at no wake speeds. Deviation from the established special local regulation must be authorized by the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23223-23225]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09096]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0276]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Lake of the Ozarks, Lakeside, MO

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local 
regulation for certain waters of the Lake of the Ozarks. This action is 
necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters 
near Lakeside, MO, during a powerboat race on June 4, 2016. This 
proposed rulemaking would designate prohibited areas for the race 
course and associated safety buffer, spectator areas, and location for 
vessels to transit during the race at no wake speeds. Deviation from 
the established special local regulation must be authorized by the 
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River or a designated 
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before May 5, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0276 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of 
Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On March 16, 2016, the Lake Race Steering Committee notified the 
Coast Guard that it will be hosting a

[[Page 23224]]

powerboat race from 9 a.m. until 6 p.m. on June 4, 2016. This is the 
third year for this event and the sponsor has indicated the intent to 
host this event annually. The Coast Guard will work with the sponsor 
for future occurrences and may propose to add this event and special 
local regulation to the list of permanently recurring events for future 
years to eliminate the need for a separate rulemaking each year. For 
this year, on June 4, several heats are planned to occur throughout the 
day in the four-mile race course located on the Lake of the Ozarks 
Osage Branch. Hazards from the powerboat race include capsizing of 
participating vessels and loss of control of participating vessels. The 
Captain of the Port (COTP) Upper Mississippi River has determined that 
potential hazards associated with the powerboat race would be a safety 
concern.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of life on 
the navigable waters immediately prior to, during, and immediately 
after the powerboat race. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking 
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1233.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a special local regulation from 9 
a.m. until 6 p.m. on June 4, 2016, designating the race course and 
location of spectator areas. Vessels transiting near the course would 
be restricted to transiting at the slowest safe speed. This special 
local regulation would cover navigable waters on the Lake of the Ozarks 
Osage Branch between miles 0 and 4. The Coast Guard has also posted a 
map depicting the location and restricted areas for this special local 
regulation in the docket. Six anchorage areas for spectators will be 
designated and are also shown on the map and labeled as A through F. 
This map may be viewed as indicated under the ADDRESSESS section. The 
duration of the regulation is intended to ensure the safety of vessels 
and these navigable waters before, during, and after the power boat 
race, scheduled from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. No vessel or person would be 
permitted to deviate from the special local regulation without 
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The 
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management 
and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, and duration of the special local regulation. Vessel traffic 
would be able to safely transit around the race course and spectators 
will have designated locations to view the race. Moreover, the Coast 
Guard would include event information in the Local Notice to Mariners, 
and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to deviate from the 
regulation.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A. above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

[[Page 23225]]

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a special 
local regulation designating the race course, location of spectator 
area, and location for vessels to transit during the race at slowest 
safe speed. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant 
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist 
and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information 
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact 
from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.T08-0276 to read as follows:


Sec.  100.T08-0276  Special Local Regulation; Lake of the Ozarks; 
Lakeside, MO.

    (a) Location. The following areas are regulated areas: (1) Lake of 
the Ozarks Osage Branch between miles 0 and 4; the Bagnell Dam and 
Birdsong Hollow Cove, covering the entire width of the branch. Access 
to the race course and associated safety buffer area will be prohibited 
to authorized vessels only. The safety buffer area for the course will 
be marked with blue buoy markers. Vessels transiting outside of the 
safety buffer area shall proceed at no wake speed. See attached map for 
additional information on location.
    (2) Six designated areas will be available for spectators for the 
duration of the races. The designated anchorage areas will be marked 
with blue and yellow buoy marker. They are labeled A-F on the attached 
map. The anchorage areas are located a minimum of 100 feet outside the 
race course safety buffer area marked with blue buoy markers. The six 
anchorages are located in the following areas: Branch Rd Point; Emerald 
Ln Point; Lotell Hollow Cove; McCoy Branch Cove; west of Duck Head 
Point; and Jennings Branch Cove. In addition to the listed designated 
anchorages, vessels may also anchor inside the protective coves.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, 
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a 
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River in the enforcement of the 
regulation.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in Sec.  100.35 
of this part, deviation from the regulations described in paragraph (a) 
of this section is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP Upper 
Mississippi River or designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to deviate from the regulation, contact the 
COTP or the COTP's designated representative via VHF-FM ch 16 or by 
calling Sector Upper Mississippi River at 314-269-2332.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9 a.m. 
to 6 p.m. on June 4, 2016.

    Dated: April 14, 2016.
M.L. Malloy,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Upper Mississippi 
River.
[FR Doc. 2016-09096 Filed 4-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules 23223

for making sure that your comment does FTC Act and other laws that the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
not include any sensitive health Commission administers permit the SECURITY
information, such as medical records or collection of public comments to
other individually identifiable health consider and use in this proceeding as Coast Guard
information. appropriate. The Commission will
In addition, do not include any consider all responsive public 33 CFR Part 100
‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or comments that it receives on or before [Docket Number USCG–2016–0276]
financial information which is . . . July 1, 2016. For information on the
privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed RIN 1625–AA08
Commission’s privacy policy, including
in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Special Local Regulation; Lake of the
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include Act, see http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/ Ozarks, Lakeside, MO
competitively sensitive information privacy.htm.
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
such as costs, sales statistics, X. Proposed Rule Language
inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
manufacturing processes, or customer List of Subjects in 16 CFR 304 SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
names. establish a special local regulation for
If you want the Commission to give Hobbies, Labeling, Trade practices.
certain waters of the Lake of the Ozarks.
your comment confidential treatment, For the reasons set forth in the This action is necessary to provide for
you must file it in paper form, with a preamble, the Federal Trade the safety of life on these navigable
request for confidential treatment, and Commission proposes to amend 16 CFR waters near Lakeside, MO, during a
you must follow the procedure part 304 as follows: powerboat race on June 4, 2016. This
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR proposed rulemaking would designate
4.9(c). In particular, the written request PART 304—RULES AND prohibited areas for the race course and
for confidential treatment that REGULATIONS UNDER THE HOBBY associated safety buffer, spectator areas,
accompanies the comment must include PROTECTION ACT and location for vessels to transit during
the factual and legal basis for the the race at no wake speeds. Deviation
request, and must identify the specific
■ 1. The authority citation for this part from the established special local
portions of the comments to be withheld
continues to read as follows: regulation must be authorized by the
from the public record. Your comment
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
will be kept confidential only if the FTC
River or a designated representative. We
General Counsel, in his or her sole
■ 2. Amend § 304.3 to read as follows: invite your comments on this proposed
discretion, grants your request in
rulemaking.
accordance with the law and the public § 304.3 Applicability.
interest. DATES: Comments and related material
Postal mail addressed to the Any person engaged in the must be received by the Coast Guard on
Commission is subject to delay due to manufacturing, or importation into the or before May 5, 2016.
heightened security screening. As a United States for introduction into or ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
result, we encourage you to submit your distribution in commerce, of imitation identified by docket number USCG–
comment online. To make sure that the political or imitation numismatic items 2016–0276 using the Federal
Commission considers your online shall be subject to the requirements of eRulemaking Portal at http://
comment, you must file it at https:// the Act and the regulations promulgated www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ thereunder. Any person engaged in the Participation and Request for
hobbyprotectionrules, by following the sale in commerce of imitation Comments’’ portion of the
instructions on the web-based form. If numismatic items shall be subject to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
this Notice appears at http:// requirements of the Act and the further instructions on submitting
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also comments.
regulations promulgated thereunder. It
may file a comment through that Web
shall be a violation of the Act and the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
site.
regulations promulgated thereunder for you have questions about this proposed
If you file your comment on paper,
a person to provide substantial rulemaking, call or email LCDR Sean
write ‘‘Hobby Protection Rules Review’’
assistance or support to any Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast
on your comment and on the envelope,
manufacturer, importer, or seller of Guard; telephone 314–269–2332, email
and mail it to the following address:
imitation numismatic items, or to any Sean.M.Peterson@uscg.mil.
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue manufacturer or importer of imitation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex B), political items, if that person knows or I. Table of Abbreviations
Washington, DC 20580. If possible, should have known that the
submit your paper comment to the manufacturer, importer, or seller is CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
Commission by courier, or overnight engaged in any practice that violates the DHS Department of Homeland Security
service. If you prefer to deliver your Act and the regulations promulgated FR Federal Register
comment, deliver it to the following thereunder. NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

address: Federal Trade Commission, By direction of the Commission. § Section
Office of the Secretary, Constitution U.S.C. United States Code
Center, 400 7th Street SW., 5th Floor, Donald S. Clark,
Secretary. II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Suite 5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC
Basis
20024. [FR Doc. 2016–09103 Filed 4–19–16; 8:45 am]
Visit the Commission Web site at BILLING CODE 6750–01–P On March 16, 2016, the Lake Race
http://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice Steering Committee notified the Coast
and the news release describing it. The Guard that it will be hosting a

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:51 Apr 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20APP1.SGM 20APP1

23224 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules

powerboat race from 9 a.m. until 6 p.m. Executive orders and we discuss First understanding this proposed rule. If the
on June 4, 2016. This is the third year Amendment rights of protestors. rule would affect your small business,
for this event and the sponsor has organization, or governmental
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
indicated the intent to host this event jurisdiction and you have questions
annually. The Coast Guard will work Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 concerning its provisions or options for
with the sponsor for future occurrences direct agencies to assess the costs and compliance, please contact the person
and may propose to add this event and benefits of available regulatory listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
special local regulation to the list of alternatives and, if regulation is CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
permanently recurring events for future necessary, to select regulatory not retaliate against small entities that
years to eliminate the need for a approaches that maximize net benefits. question or complain about this
separate rulemaking each year. For this Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the proposed rule or any policy or action of
year, on June 4, several heats are importance of quantifying both costs the Coast Guard.
planned to occur throughout the day in and benefits, of reducing costs, of
the four-mile race course located on the harmonizing rules, and of promoting C. Collection of Information
Lake of the Ozarks Osage Branch. flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory This proposed rule would not call for
Hazards from the powerboat race a new collection of information under
include capsizing of participating action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
vessels and loss of control of (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
participating vessels. The Captain of the reviewed by the Office of Management
Port (COTP) Upper Mississippi River and Budget. D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
has determined that potential hazards This regulatory action determination Governments
associated with the powerboat race is based on the size, location, and
would be a safety concern. duration of the special local regulation. A rule has implications for federalism
Vessel traffic would be able to safely under Executive Order 13132,
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
transit around the race course and Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
ensure the safety of life on the navigable
spectators will have designated effect on the States, on the relationship
waters immediately prior to, during, and
locations to view the race. Moreover, the between the national government and
immediately after the powerboat race.
Coast Guard would include event the States, or on the distribution of
The Coast Guard proposes this
information in the Local Notice to power and responsibilities among the
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
Mariners, and the rule would allow various levels of government. We have
1233.
vessels to seek permission to deviate analyzed this proposed rule under that
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule from the regulation. Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
The COTP proposes to establish a B. Impact on Small Entities
federalism principles and preemption
special local regulation from 9 a.m. until The Regulatory Flexibility Act of requirements described in Executive
6 p.m. on June 4, 2016, designating the 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Order 13132.
race course and location of spectator requires Federal agencies to consider
areas. Vessels transiting near the course Also, this proposed rule does not have
the potential impact of regulations on
would be restricted to transiting at the tribal implications under Executive
small entities during rulemaking. The
slowest safe speed. This special local Order 13175, Consultation and
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
regulation would cover navigable waters Coordination with Indian Tribal
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
on the Lake of the Ozarks Osage Branch Governments, because it would not have
that are independently owned and
between miles 0 and 4. The Coast Guard a substantial direct effect on one or
operated and are not dominant in their
has also posted a map depicting the more Indian tribes, on the relationship
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
location and restricted areas for this between the Federal Government and
with populations of less than 50,000.
special local regulation in the docket. Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
Six anchorage areas for spectators will power and responsibilities between the
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
be designated and are also shown on the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
have a significant economic impact on
map and labeled as A through F. This If you believe this proposed rule has
a substantial number of small entities.
map may be viewed as indicated under While some owners or operators of implications for federalism or Indian
the ADDRESSESS section. The duration of vessels intending to transit the safety tribes, please contact the person listed
the regulation is intended to ensure the zone may be small entities, for the in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
safety of vessels and these navigable CONTACT section.
reasons stated in section IV.A. above
waters before, during, and after the this proposed rule would not have a E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
power boat race, scheduled from 9 a.m. significant economic impact on any
to 6 p.m. No vessel or person would be vessel owner or operator. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
permitted to deviate from the special If you think that your business, of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
local regulation without obtaining organization, or governmental Federal agencies to assess the effects of
permission from the COTP or a jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity their discretionary regulatory actions. In
designated representative. The and that this rule would have a particular, the Act addresses actions
regulatory text we are proposing appears significant economic impact on it, that may result in the expenditure by a
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

at the end of this document. please submit a comment (see State, local, or tribal government, in the
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it aggregate, or by the private sector of
IV. Regulatory Analyses
qualifies and how and to what degree $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
We developed this proposed rule after this rule would economically affect it. more in any one year. Though this
considering numerous statutes and Under section 213(a) of the Small proposed rule would not result in such
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Business Regulatory Enforcement an expenditure, we do discuss the
Below we summarize our analyses Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), effects of this rule elsewhere in this
based on a number of these statutes and we want to assist small entities in preamble.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:51 Apr 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20APP1.SGM 20APP1

Document Created: 2016-04-20 01:51:30
Document Modified: 2016-04-20 01:51:30

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 5, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 23223
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways

81 FR 23223 - Special Local Regulation; Lake of the Ozarks, Lakeside, MO

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 76 (April 20, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard