81 FR 23758 - Guidance for Closure of Activities Related to Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 78 (April 22, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 78 (April 22, 2016)
| Page Range | 23758-23760 | |
| FR Document | 2016-09421 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 23758-23760] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-09421] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2016-0084] Guidance for Closure of Activities Related to Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is soliciting public comment on its draft Japan Lessons-Learned Division Interim Staff Guidance (JLD-ISG), JLD-ISG-2016-01, ``Guidance for Activities Related to Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation; Focused Evaluation and Integrated Assessment.'' This draft JLD-ISG revision provides guidance and clarification to assist operating power reactor respondents and holders of construction permits under the NRC's regulations with the performance of the focused evaluations and revised integrated assessments for external flooding. DATES: Submit comments by May 23, 2016. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods (unless [[Page 23759]] this document describes a different method for submitting comments on a specific subject):Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0084. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Bowman, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001; telephone: 301-415-2963; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0084 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0084. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. For the convenience of the reader, the ADAMS accession numbers for obtaining materials referenced in this document are provided in a table in the section of this notice entitled, Availability of Documents. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2016-0084 in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. II. Background Following the events at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant on March 11, 2011, the NRC established a senior-level agency task force referred to as the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF). The NTTF was tasked with conducting a systematic and methodical review of the NRC regulations and processes, and determining if the agency should make additional improvements to these programs in light of the events at Fukushima Dai-ichi. As a result of this review, the NTTF developed a comprehensive set of recommendations, documented in SECY-11-0093, ``Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident,'' dated July 12, 2011. These recommendations were enhanced by the NRC staff following interactions with stakeholders. Documentation of the staff's efforts is contained in SECY-11-0124, dated September 9, 2011, and SECY-11-0137, dated October 3, 2011. As directed by the Commission's SRM for SECY-11-0093, the NRC staff reviewed the NTTF recommendations within the context of the NRC's existing regulatory framework and considered the various regulatory vehicles available to the NRC to implement the recommendations. In SECY-11-0124 and SECY-11-0137, the staff established the prioritization of the recommendations. After receiving the Commission's direction in SRM-SECY-11-0124 and SRM-SECY-11-0137, the NRC staff issued a request for information pursuant to section 50.54(f) of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Conditions of licenses,'' on March 12, 2012, requesting licensees to reevaluate the seismic and flooding hazards at their sites using updated hazard information and current regulatory guidance and methodologies. For plants where the reevaluated hazard exceeds the plant's design basis, the licensee was to conduct an integrated assessment. The information gathering is considered to be Phase 1 and was requested to support Phase 2 decision-making and determine whether available or planned measures provide sufficient protection and mitigation capabilities or if further regulatory action should be pursued in the areas of seismic and flooding design, and emergency preparedness. In COMSECY-14-0037, dated November 21, 2014, the NRC staff requested that the Commission review and approve changes to revise the Recommendation 2.1 flooding assessments and integrate the Phase 2 decision-making into the development and implementation of mitigating strategies in accordance with Order EA-12-049 and the related Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events rulemaking. In SRM-COMSECY-14-0037, the Commission disapproved this recommendation. Instead, the Commission instructed the staff to develop a closure plan for the flooding reevaluation activities and to reassess the existing guidance for performing a Phase 1 integrated assessment in order to focus on those plants with the most potential for safety benefits. In COMSECY-15-0019, the staff provided revised guidance for performing a Phase 1 integrated assessment and described a modified process for identifying the list of plants that would be required to perform an integrated assessment. The process proposed by the staff included the development of a graded, risk-informed and performance- based approach consistent with Commission direction to focus on those plants with the greatest potential need for safety enhancements. Specifically, the process included consideration and evaluation of local intense precipitation by performing a focused evaluation of the impact of the [[Page 23760]] hazard and implementing any necessary programmatic, procedural, or plant modifications to address the hazard, taking into account available warning time. The process also considered flood protection and available physical margin, where licensees will confirm the capability of existing flood protection to address the hazard exceedance by performing a focused evaluation. For licensees where the reevaluated hazard cannot be addressed via existing or planned flood protection, the process also includes the performance of an integrated assessment, using revised guidance, in order to conduct more detailed evaluations of plant response capability. This revised integrated assessment will capture, among other information, quantitative characteristics about the reliability of various aspects of plant response (e.g., reliability of equipment and manual actions), and risk insights with a focus on cliff-edge effects. The results will be used by the NRC to determine whether additional regulatory action, such as a plant-specific backfit, are warranted. In SRM-COMSECY-15-0019, the Commission approved the staff's plans to modify the approach for integrated assessments to implement a graded approach for determining the need for, and prioritization and scope of, plant-specific integrated assessments. As discussed in COMSECY-15-0019, the majority of sites with reevaluated flooding hazards exceeding the design-basis flood are expected to screen out from the integrated assessment process. The licensees will instead provide focused evaluations to ensure appropriate actions are taken and that these actions are effective and reasonable. The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) submitted guidance NEI 16-05, ``External Flooding Assessment Guidelines,'' Revision 0, on April 12, 2016. The guidance is an industry-developed methodology that describes the flooding impact assessment process, which is intended to meet the requested information of an integrated assessment, as described in the document titled, ``Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident,'' and to incorporate the changes described in COMSECY-15-0019. Draft ISG JLD ISG 2016-01 is being issued to describe to stakeholders methods acceptable to the staff for performance of the focused evaluations and revised integrated assessments and describe some exceptions and clarifications to NEI 16-05, Revision 0. This guidance is not intended for use in design-basis applications or in regulatory activities beyond the scope of performing the focused evaluations and integrated assessment part of NTTF Recommendation 2.1 flooding activities. This ISG is being issued in draft form for public comment to involve the public in development of the implementation guidance. Compliance with the ISG is not required. III. Availability of Documents The documents identified in the following table are available to interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as indicated. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Document title ADAMS accession No. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Request for Information Pursuant to Title ML12053A340 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012. SECY-11-0093, ``Recommendations for ML11186A950 Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident,'' dated July 12, 2011. Commission's staff requirements ML112310021 memorandum (SRM) for SECY-11-0093, dated August 19, 2011. SECY-11-0124, ``Recommended Actions to be ML11245A158 Taken Without Delay from the Near-Term Task Force Report,'' dated September 9, 2011. SRM-SECY-11-0124, dated October 18, 2011. ML112911571 SECY-11-0137, ``Prioritization of ML11272A111 Recommended Actions to be Taken in Response to Fukushima Lessons Learned,'' dated October 3, 2011. SRM-SECY-11-0137, dated December 15, 2011 ML113490055 COMSECY-14-0037, ``Integration of ML14238A616 Mitigating Strategies for Beyond-Design- Basis External Events and the Reevaluaton (sic) of Flooding Hazards,'' dated November 21, 2014. SRM-COMSECY-14-0037, dated March 30, 2015 ML15089A236 COMSECY-15-0019, ``Closure Plan for the ML15153A104 Reevaluation of Flooding Hazards for Operating Nuclear Power Plants,'' dated June 30, 2015. SRM-COMSECY-15-0019, dated July 28, 2015. ML15209A682 NEI 16-05, ``External Flooding Assessment ML16105A327 Guidelines,'' Rev. 0, dated April 12, 2016. Draft JLD-ISG-2016-01 ``Guidance For ML16090A140 Activities Related To Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation; Focused Evaluation and Integrated Assessment,'' Revision 0. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NRC may post materials related to this document, including public comments, on the Federal rulemaking Web site at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2016-0084. The Federal rulemaking Web site allows you to receive alerts when changes or additions occur in a docket folder. To subscribe: (1) Navigate to the docket folder (NRC-2016-0084); (2) click the ``Sign up for Email Alerts'' link; and (3) enter your email address and select how frequently you would like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or monthly). Proposed Action By this action, the NRC is requesting public comments on draft ISG JLD-ISG-2016-01. This draft JLD-ISG proposes guidance related to the performance of a focused evaluation and integrated assessment as part of NTTF 2.1 flooding activities. The NRC staff will make a final determination regarding issuance of the JLD-ISG after it considers any public comments received in response to this request. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of April, 2016. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Gregory Bowman, Acting Director, Japan Lessons-Learned Division, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2016-09421 Filed 4-21-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![23758 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Notices
Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on 10:25 a.m.–11:25 a.m.: IRGs & SEEDs
provide advice and recommendations the impact of its policies, programs and 11:25 a.m.–11:55 p.m.: Education and
concerning further NSF support for the activities on the CISE community. To Outreach
Center. provide advice to the Assistant Director 12:00 p.m.–1:05 p.m.: Lunch with
of NSF for CISE on issues related to MRSEC students and postdocs
Agenda 1:10 p.m.–2:15 p.m.: Shared
long-range planning, and to form ad hoc
Friday, May 16, 2016 subcommittees and working groups to Experimental Facilities Tour
8:45 a.m.–9:00 a.m.: Informal Meeting carry out needed studies and tasks. 2:15 p.m.–3:00 p.m.: NSF Panel Caucus
NSF PDs & MRSEC Director (Closed)
Agenda 3:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m.: NSF debrief
(CLOSED)
9:00 a.m.–9:05 a.m.: Introductions • Welcome and CISE updates MRSEC Executive Committee (Closed)
9:05 a.m.–10:05 a.m.: Princeton MRSEC • Program updates for the CISE Reason for Closing: The work being
Overview (Yazdani) divisions of Information and reviewed include information of a
10:05 a.m.–10:25 a.m.: Coffee Break Intelligent Systems and Computing proprietary or confidential nature,
10:25 a.m.–11:25 a.m.: IRGs & SEEDs and Communication Foundations including technical information;
11:25 a.m.–11:55 p.m.: Education and • Activities update: Computer Science financial data, such as salaries and
Outreach for All personal information concerning
12:00 p.m.–1:05 p.m.: Lunch with • Working group breakout sessions and individuals associated with the
MRSEC students and postdocs report outs: New Partnership Models proposals. These matters are exempt
1:10 p.m.–2:15 p.m.: Shared for CISE Research; and Data Science under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Experimental Facilities Tour • Closing remarks and wrap-up Government in the Sunshine Act.
2:15 p.m.–3:00 p.m.: NSF Panel Caucus
Dated: April 19, 2016. Dated: April 19, 2016.
(CLOSED)
3:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m.: NSF debrief Crystal Robinson, Crystal Robinson,
MRSEC Executive Committee Committee Management Officer. Committee Management Officer.
(CLOSED) [FR Doc. 2016–09365 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2016–09406 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
Reason for Closing: The work being BILLING CODE 7555–01–P BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
reviewed include information of a
proprietary or confidential nature,
including technical information; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
financial data, such as salaries and COMMISSION
Proposal Review Panel for Materials
personal information concerning
Research; Notice of Meeting [NRC–2016–0084]
individuals associated with the
proposals. These matters are exempt In accordance with the Federal Guidance for Closure of Activities
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– Related to Recommendation 2.1,
Government in the Sunshine Act. 463 as amended), the National Science Flooding Hazard Reevaluation
Dated: April 19, 2016. Foundation announces the following
Crystal Robinson, meeting: AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Names: Proposal Review Panel for Commission.
Committee Management Officer.
Materials Research—Materials Research ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance;
[FR Doc. 2016–09410 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
Science & Engineering Centers Site request for comment.
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
Visit, New York University (V160700)
#1203 SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Dates and Times: May 13, 2016; 8:45 Commission (NRC) is soliciting public
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION comment on its draft Japan Lessons-
a.m. EST–3:30 p.m. EST
Advisory Committee for Computer and Place: New York University, New Learned Division Interim Staff Guidance
Information Science and Engineering; York, NY (JLD–ISG), JLD–ISG–2016–01,
Notice of Meeting Type of Meeting: Part-Open ‘‘Guidance for Activities Related to
Contact Person: Dr. Daniele Finotello, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation
In accordance with the Federal Program Director, Materials Research 2.1, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation;
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– Science & Engineering Centers, MRSEC. Focused Evaluation and Integrated
463, as amended), the National Science Division of Materials Research, Room Assessment.’’ This draft JLD–ISG
Foundation (NSF) announces the 1065, National Science Foundation, revision provides guidance and
following meeting: 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA clarification to assist operating power
Name: Advisory Committee for 22230, Telephone (703) 292–4676. reactor respondents and holders of
Computer and Information Science and Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to construction permits under the NRC’s
Engineering (CISE) (1115). provide advice and recommendations regulations with the performance of the
Date/Time: May 19, 2016; 12:30 p.m. concerning further NSF support for the focused evaluations and revised
to 5:30 p.m.; May 20, 2016; 8:30 a.m. to Center. integrated assessments for external
12:30 p.m. flooding.
Place: National Science Foundation, Agenda:
DATES: Submit comments by May 23,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235,
Friday, May 13, 2016 2016. Comments received after this date
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
Type of Meeting: OPEN. 8:45am–9:00 a.m.: Informal Meeting will be considered if it is practical to do
Contact Person: Brenda Williams, NSF PDs & MRSEC Director (Closed) so, but the Commission is able to ensure
National Science Foundation, 4201 9:00 a.m.–9:05 a.m.: Introductions consideration only for comments
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1105, 9:05 a.m.–10:05 a.m.: NYU MRSEC received on or before this date.
Arlington, Virginia 22230; Telephone: Overview (Ward) ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
703/292–8900. 10:05 a.m.–10:25 a.m.: Coffee Break by any of the following methods (unless
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:18 Apr 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM 22APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_23836/page/1.svg)
![23760 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Notices
hazard and implementing any necessary In SRM–COMSECY–15–0019, the Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of
programmatic, procedural, or plant Commission approved the staff’s plans the Near-Term Task Force Review of
modifications to address the hazard, to modify the approach for integrated Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
taking into account available warning assessments to implement a graded Accident,’’ and to incorporate the
time. The process also considered flood approach for determining the need for, changes described in COMSECY–15–
protection and available physical and prioritization and scope of, plant- 0019.
margin, where licensees will confirm specific integrated assessments. As Draft ISG JLD ISG 2016–01 is being
the capability of existing flood discussed in COMSECY–15–0019, the issued to describe to stakeholders
protection to address the hazard majority of sites with reevaluated methods acceptable to the staff for
exceedance by performing a focused flooding hazards exceeding the design- performance of the focused evaluations
evaluation. For licensees where the basis flood are expected to screen out and revised integrated assessments and
reevaluated hazard cannot be addressed from the integrated assessment process. describe some exceptions and
The licensees will instead provide clarifications to NEI 16–05, Revision 0.
via existing or planned flood protection,
focused evaluations to ensure This guidance is not intended for use
the process also includes the
appropriate actions are taken and that in design-basis applications or in
performance of an integrated
these actions are effective and regulatory activities beyond the scope of
assessment, using revised guidance, in reasonable. performing the focused evaluations and
order to conduct more detailed The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) integrated assessment part of NTTF
evaluations of plant response capability. submitted guidance NEI 16–05, Recommendation 2.1 flooding activities.
This revised integrated assessment will ‘‘External Flooding Assessment This ISG is being issued in draft form
capture, among other information, Guidelines,’’ Revision 0, on April 12, for public comment to involve the
quantitative characteristics about the 2016. The guidance is an industry- public in development of the
reliability of various aspects of plant developed methodology that describes implementation guidance. Compliance
response (e.g., reliability of equipment the flooding impact assessment process, with the ISG is not required.
and manual actions), and risk insights which is intended to meet the requested
with a focus on cliff-edge effects. The information of an integrated assessment, III. Availability of Documents
results will be used by the NRC to as described in the document titled, The documents identified in the
determine whether additional regulatory ‘‘Request for Information Pursuant to following table are available to
action, such as a plant-specific backfit, Title 10 of the Code of Federal interested persons through one or more
are warranted. Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f) Regarding of the following methods, as indicated.
ADAMS
Document title accession No.
Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f) Regarding Recommenda- ML12053A340
tions 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March
12, 2012.
SECY–11–0093, ‘‘Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, the Near-Term Task Force Review of ML11186A950
Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident,’’ dated July 12, 2011.
Commission’s staff requirements memorandum (SRM) for SECY–11–0093, dated August 19, 2011 .............................................. ML112310021
SECY–11–0124, ‘‘Recommended Actions to be Taken Without Delay from the Near-Term Task Force Report,’’ dated Sep- ML11245A158
tember 9, 2011.
SRM–SECY–11–0124, dated October 18, 2011 ................................................................................................................................ ML112911571
SECY–11–0137, ‘‘Prioritization of Recommended Actions to be Taken in Response to Fukushima Lessons Learned,’’ dated Oc- ML11272A111
tober 3, 2011.
SRM–SECY–11–0137, dated December 15, 2011 ............................................................................................................................ ML113490055
COMSECY–14–0037, ‘‘Integration of Mitigating Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events and the Reevaluaton (sic) ML14238A616
of Flooding Hazards,’’ dated November 21, 2014.
SRM–COMSECY–14–0037, dated March 30, 2015 ........................................................................................................................... ML15089A236
COMSECY–15–0019, ‘‘Closure Plan for the Reevaluation of Flooding Hazards for Operating Nuclear Power Plants,’’ dated ML15153A104
June 30, 2015.
SRM–COMSECY–15–0019, dated July 28, 2015 .............................................................................................................................. ML15209A682
NEI 16–05, ‘‘External Flooding Assessment Guidelines,’’ Rev. 0, dated April 12, 2016 ................................................................... ML16105A327
Draft JLD–ISG–2016–01 ‘‘Guidance For Activities Related To Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard ML16090A140
Reevaluation; Focused Evaluation and Integrated Assessment,’’ Revision 0.
The NRC may post materials related frequently you would like to receive public comments received in response
to this document, including public emails (daily, weekly, or monthly). to this request.
comments, on the Federal rulemaking Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
Proposed Action
Web site at http://www.regulations.gov of April, 2016.
under Docket ID NRC–2016–0084. The By this action, the NRC is requesting For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Federal rulemaking Web site allows you public comments on draft ISG JLD–ISG–
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Gregory Bowman,
to receive alerts when changes or 2016–01. This draft JLD–ISG proposes
additions occur in a docket folder. To Acting Director, Japan Lessons-Learned
guidance related to the performance of
Division, Office of Nuclear Reactor
subscribe: (1) Navigate to the docket a focused evaluation and integrated Regulation.
folder (NRC–2016–0084); (2) click the assessment as part of NTTF 2.1 flooding
[FR Doc. 2016–09421 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
‘‘Sign up for Email Alerts’’ link; and (3) activities. The NRC staff will make a
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
enter your email address and select how final determination regarding issuance
of the JLD–ISG after it considers any
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:18 Apr 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM 22APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_23836/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-08-22 23:37:18
Document Modified: 2017-08-22 23:37:18
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Draft interim staff guidance; request for comment. | |
| Dates | Submit comments by May 23, 2016. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. | |
| Contact | Eric Bowman, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001; telephone: 301-415-2963; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 23758 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR