81 FR 24523 - Adjustment of Cable Statutory License Royalty Rates
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 80 (April 26, 2016)
Copyright Royalty Board
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 80 (April 26, 2016)
| Page Range | 24523-24525 | |
| FR Document | 2016-09626 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 24523-24525] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-09626] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Copyright Royalty Board 37 CFR Chapter III [Docket No. 15-CRB-0010-CA] Adjustment of Cable Statutory License Royalty Rates AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges (Judges) publish for comment proposed regulations governing royalty rates and terms for the distant retransmission of over-the-air television and radio broadcast stations by cable television systems to their subscribers. DATES: Comments are due no later than May 17, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments via email to [email protected] or online at http://www.regulations.gov. Those who choose not to submit comments electronically should see How to Submit Comments in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for physical addresses and further instructions. The proposed rule is also posted on the agency's Web site (www.loc.gov/crb). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Whittle, Attorney Advisor, by telephone at (202) 707-7658, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 15, 2016, the Copyright Royalty Judges (Judges) received a motion from the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, the American Cable Association, and a group referring to itself as the ``Phase I Parties'' requesting that the Judges adopt a partial settlement of the movants' interests regarding royalty rates and terms for the statutory copyright license for eligible cable retransmissions for the period 2015-2019. The settlement proposes that the rates, terms, and gross receipts limitations remain the same as those currently in effect. See 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1)(B) and 37 CFR 256.2(c)- (d). Motion of the Participating Parties to Adopt Partial Settlement, Docket No. 15-CRB-0010-CA (2015-2019) (Motion). The Judges hereby publish proposed regulations reflecting the proposed settlement and request comments from interested parties as required by 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(7)(A). Section 111 of the Copyright Act grants a statutory copyright license to cable television systems for the distant retransmission of over-the-air television and radio broadcast stations to their subscribers. 17 U.S.C. 111(c). In exchange for the license, cable operators submit to the Copyright Office semiannually royalty payments and statements of account detailing their retransmissions. 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1). The Copyright Office deposits the royalties into the United States Treasury for later distribution to copyright owners of the broadcast programming that the cable systems retransmit. 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(2). A cable system calculates its royalty payments in accordance with the statutory formula described in 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1). Royalty rates are based upon a cable system's gross receipts from subscribers who receive retransmitted broadcast signals. For rate calculation purposes, cable systems are divided into three tiers based on their gross receipts (small, medium, and large). 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1)(B) through (F). Both the applicable rates and the tiers are subject to adjustment. 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(2). Every five years persons with a significant interest in the royalty rates may file petitions to initiate a proceeding to adjust the rates. 17 U.S.C. 804(a) and (b). No person with a significant interest filed a petition to initiate a proceeding in 2015.\1\ Therefore, the Judges initiated this rate adjustment proceeding by notice published in the Federal Register in June 2015. See 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(2), 803(b)(1), 804(a) and (b); 80 FR 35403 (Jun. 19, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The cable rates were last adjusted in 2005, at a time when the Copyright Office was transferring responsibility for royalty rate proceedings from Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels (CARP) to the newly authorized Copyright Royalty Judges. Although the Judges commenced a rate proceeding relating to the 2010 rate adjustment, the Judges terminated it when passage of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010, Public Law 111-151, 124 Stat. 1027 (``2010 STELA''), rendered the proceeding unnecessary. See Order Granting Request to Terminate Proceeding, Docket No. 2010-1 CRB Cable Rate (July 13, 2010). At that time, although the act changed the relevant rates, neither the Register of Copyrights nor the Judges updated the statement of the prior rates in subsections (a) and (b) of section 256 of 37 CFR, the chapter of the Regulations applying to CARP. The STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014 did not change the cable royalty rates in Sec. 111. See Public Law 113-200, 28 Stat. 2059 (Dec. 4, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Judges received two joint Petitions to Participate, one from the National Cable & Telecommunications Association and the American Cable Association and another from a group referring to itself as the ``Phase I Parties''.\2\ The Judges accepted these petitions and commenced a Voluntary Negotiation Period (VNP). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The Phase I Parties consist of Program Suppliers, Joint Sports Claimants, Public Television Claimants, Commercial Television Claimants, Music Claimants, Canadian Claimants Group, National Public Radio, and Devotional Claimants. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On December 15, 2015, at the conclusion of the VNP, all participants notified the Judges that they had settled and asked that cable retransmission rates remain unchanged for the rate period 2015 to 2019, inclusive. On November 23, 2015, however, one of the participants, the Joint Sports Claimants (JSC),\3\ had filed a ``Petition . . . to Initiate Cable Royalty Rate Adjustment Proceedings'' with a self-styled caption indicating a proceeding for cable rate adjustments ``for Retransmission of Certain Sports Telecasts.'' Given the seemingly conflicting positions of the JSC, the Judges rejected the settlement, without prejudice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Joint Sports Claimants are: The National Basketball Association, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the National Football League, the National Hockey League, the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, and the Women's National Basketball Association. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The settling participants have now asked that the Judges adopt the settlement and permit continuing proceedings to determine whether and to what degree to make a rate adjustment under section 801(b)(2)(C). Motion at 1, 6-7. Section 801(b)(2)(C) provides for adjustment proceedings \4\ in the event the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) changes its rule ``with respect to . . . sports program exclusivity. . . .'' The JSC base their November 23, 2015 petition on an FCC rule change, viz., repeal of the sports exclusivity rules, effective November 24, 2014.\5\ The Judges announce [[Page 24524]] commencement of further proceedings on the issue raised by that petition in a separate notice in the Federal Register. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Apart from the quinquennial proceedings required by Sec. 804 of the Act. \5\ Petition of the Joint Sports Claimants to Initiate Cable Royalty Rate Adjustment Proceedings (Nov. 23, 2015). In its petition, JSC requests that the Judges ``initiate proceedings to adjust the cable statutory license royalty rates `to assure that such rates are reasonable in light of' the repeal of the Sports Blackout Rules.'' Petition at 1. In its Motion to Adopt Partial Settlement, the self-styled ``Participating Parties,'' which includes JSC, states that ``[t]he Joint Sports Rule Petition requests a new Section 111 royalty rate pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(2)(C) to account for the November 2014 elimination of the [FCC's] Sports Rule (a ``Sports Rule Surcharge''). Motion at 1-2. According to the Motion, ``[n]either the Judges nor their predecessors have previously conducted any proceeding under Section 801(b)(2)(C) to consider the adoption of a cable rate to account for changes in the FCC Sports Rule,'' although Section 801(b)(2)(C) has been invoked twice since its enactment with respect to the syndicated exclusivity provision of the section. Motion at 2, n.2. The Participating Parties state that they do not believe that the JSC Sports Rule Petition precludes adoption of their agreement as set forth in the Dec. 15 Settlement Notice. That agreement concerns only the Quinquennial Cable Rate Adjustments. It resolves all issues concerning those quinquennial adjustments by agreeing to retain without change the existing cable royalty rates (the base rates, 3.75 percent rate and the Syndicated Exclusivity Surcharge) and existing gross receipts limitations during the years 2015-19. It simply does not address the issue of whether the Judges should make any changes in cable rates pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(2)(B) & (C) to account for changes in FCC cable rules. Motion at 5-6 (emphasis original). Statutory Timing of Adoption of Rates and Terms Section 801(b)(7)(A) allows for the adoption of rates and terms negotiated by ``some or all of the participants in a proceeding at any time during the proceeding'' provided the parties submit the negotiated rates and terms to the Judges for approval. That provision directs the Judges to provide those who would be bound by the negotiated rates and terms an opportunity to comment on the agreement. Unless a participant in a proceeding objects and the Judges conclude that the agreement does not provide a reasonable basis for setting statutory rates or terms, the Judges adopt the negotiated rates and terms. 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(7)(A). If the Judges adopt the proposed rates and terms pursuant to this provision for the 2015-2019 rate period, the adopted (and thus, existing) rates and terms and gross receipts limitations will continue to be binding on all cable systems that retransmit distantly over-the- air television and radio broadcast stations to their subscribers and on all copyright owners of the broadcast programming that the cable systems retransmit during the license period 2015-2019, except to the extent those rates and terms may be adjusted for sports programming in the portion of the proceeding focused on the effect, if any, of the FCC Sports Exclusivity Rule change. Proposed Adjustments to Rates and Terms If the Judges adopt the proposed rules that include the terms of the settlement, these rules shall take effect upon final adoption. The Judges have statutory authority to promulgate their own rules which, when adopted, shall render inapplicable the prior rules that pertained to the rates and terms as established by the now defunct CARP, in part 256 of the existing regulation (37 CFR, part 256). The Judges will update the terms, eliminate surplus verbiage, make the rules easier to read, and codify them in Chapter 3 of Title 37 of the CFR. Chapter 3 is the chapter that governs Copyright Royalty Board proceedings. If adopted, the proposed rules shall be designated ``part 387.'' Interested parties may comment and object to any or all of the proposed regulations contained in this notice. Such comments and objections must be submitted no later than May 17, 2016. How To Submit Comments Interested members of the public must submit comments to only one of the following addresses. If not commenting by email or online, commenters must submit an original of their comments, five paper copies, and an electronic version on a CD. Email: [email protected]; or Online: http://www.regulations.gov; or U.S. mail: Copyright Royalty Board, P.O. Box 70977, Washington, DC 20024-0977; or Overnight service (only USPS Express Mail is acceptable): Copyright Royalty Board, P.O. Box 70977, Washington, DC 20024-0977; or Commercial courier: Address package to: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress, James Madison Memorial Building, LM-403, 101 Independence Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20559-6000. Deliver to: Congressional Courier Acceptance Site, 2nd Street NE., and D Street NE., Washington, DC; or Hand delivery: Library of Congress, James Madison Memorial Building, LM-401, 101 Independence Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20559- 6000. List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 387 Copyright, Cable Television, Royalties. Proposed Regulations For the reasons set forth in the preamble, and under the authority of chapter 8, title 17, United States Code, the Copyright Royalty Judges propose to amend 37 CFR Chapter III as follows: Add a new Part 387. PART 387--ADJUSTMENT OF ROYALTY FEE FOR CABLE COMPULSORY LICENSE Sec. 387.1 General 387.2 Royalty fee for compulsory license for secondary transmission by cable systems. Authority: 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(2), 803(b)(6). Sec. 387.1 General. This part establishes adjusted terms and rates for royalty payments in accordance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 111 and 801(b)(2)(A), (B), (C), and (D). Upon compliance with 17 U.S.C. 111 and the terms and rates of this part, a cable system entity may engage in the activities set forth in 17 U.S.C. 111. Sec. 387.2 Royalty fee for compulsory license for secondary transmission by cable systems. (a) Royalty fee rates. Commencing with the first semiannual accounting period of 2015 and for each semiannual accounting period thereafter, the royalty fee rates for secondary transmission by cable systems are those established by 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1)(B)(i)-(iv), as amended. (b) Alternate tiered rates. Commencing with the first semiannual accounting period of 2015 and for each semiannual accounting period thereafter, the alternate tiered royalty fee rates for cable systems with certain levels of gross receipts as described in 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1) (E) and (F), are those described therein. (c) 3.75 percent rate. Commencing with the first semiannual accounting period of 2015, and for each semiannual accounting period thereafter, and notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section, for each distant signal equivalent or fraction thereof not represented by the carriage of: (1) Any signal that was permitted (or, in the case of cable systems commencing operations after June 24, 1981, that would have been permitted) under the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission in effect on June 24, 1981, or (2) A signal of the same type (that is, independent, network, or non-commercial educational) substituted for such permitted signal, or (3) A signal that was carried pursuant to an individual waiver of the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commissioning effect on June 24, 1981; in lieu of the royalty rates specified in paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section, the royalty rate shall be 3.75 percent of the gross receipts of the cable system for each distant signal equivalent. Any fraction of a distant signal equivalent shall be computed at its fractional value. (d) Syndicated exclusivity surcharge. Commencing with the first semiannual accounting period of 2015 and for each semiannual accounting period thereafter, in the case of a cable system [[Page 24525]] located outside the 35-mile specified zone of a commercial VHF station that places a predicted Grade B contour, in whole or in part, over the cable system, and that is not significantly viewed or otherwise exempt from the FCC's syndicated exclusivity rules in effect on June 24, 1981, for each distant signal equivalent or fraction thereof represented by the carriage of such commercial VHF station, the royalty rate shall be, in addition to the amount specified in paragraph (a) of this section, (1) For cable systems located wholly or in part within a top 50 television market, (i) 0.599 percent of such gross receipts for the first distant signal equivalent; (ii) 0.377 percent of such gross receipts for each of the second, third, and fourth distant signal equivalents; and (iii) 0.178 percent of such gross receipts for the fifth distant signal equivalent and each additional distant signal equivalent thereafter; (2) For cable systems located wholly or in part within a second 50 television market, (i) 0.300 percent of such gross receipts for the first distant signal equivalent; (ii) 0.189 percent of such gross receipts for each of the second, third, and fourth distant signal equivalents; and (iii) 0.089 percent of such gross receipts for the fifth distant signal equivalent and each additional distant signal equivalent thereafter; (3) For purposes of this section ``top 50 television markets'' and ``second 50 television markets'' shall be defined as the comparable terms are defined or interpreted in accordance with 47 CFR 76.51, as effective June 24, 1981. (e) Computation of rates. Computation of royalty fees shall be governed by 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1)(C). Dated: April 20, 2016. Suzanne M. Barnett, Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. [FR Doc. 2016-09626 Filed 4-25-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1410-72-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2016 / Proposed Rules 24523
Dated: April 7, 2016. (Motion). The Judges hereby publish National Cable & Telecommunications
J.S. Dufresne, proposed regulations reflecting the Association and the American Cable
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the proposed settlement and request Association and another from a group
Port North Carolina. comments from interested parties as referring to itself as the ‘‘Phase I
[FR Doc. 2016–09677 Filed 4–25–16; 8:45 am] required by 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(7)(A). Parties’’.2 The Judges accepted these
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Section 111 of the Copyright Act petitions and commenced a Voluntary
grants a statutory copyright license to Negotiation Period (VNP).
cable television systems for the distant On December 15, 2015, at the
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS retransmission of over-the-air television conclusion of the VNP, all participants
and radio broadcast stations to their notified the Judges that they had settled
Copyright Royalty Board subscribers. 17 U.S.C. 111(c). In and asked that cable retransmission
exchange for the license, cable operators rates remain unchanged for the rate
37 CFR Chapter III submit to the Copyright Office period 2015 to 2019, inclusive. On
semiannually royalty payments and November 23, 2015, however, one of the
[Docket No. 15–CRB–0010–CA] statements of account detailing their participants, the Joint Sports Claimants
retransmissions. 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1). (JSC),3 had filed a ‘‘Petition . . . to
Adjustment of Cable Statutory License The Copyright Office deposits the Initiate Cable Royalty Rate Adjustment
Royalty Rates royalties into the United States Treasury Proceedings’’ with a self-styled caption
AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, for later distribution to copyright indicating a proceeding for cable rate
Library of Congress. owners of the broadcast programming adjustments ‘‘for Retransmission of
ACTION: Proposed rule. that the cable systems retransmit. 17 Certain Sports Telecasts.’’ Given the
U.S.C. 111(d)(2). seemingly conflicting positions of the
SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges A cable system calculates its royalty JSC, the Judges rejected the settlement,
(Judges) publish for comment proposed payments in accordance with the without prejudice.
regulations governing royalty rates and statutory formula described in 17 U.S.C. The settling participants have now
terms for the distant retransmission of 111(d)(1). Royalty rates are based upon asked that the Judges adopt the
over-the-air television and radio a cable system’s gross receipts from settlement and permit continuing
broadcast stations by cable television subscribers who receive retransmitted proceedings to determine whether and
systems to their subscribers. broadcast signals. For rate calculation to what degree to make a rate
DATES: Comments are due no later than purposes, cable systems are divided into adjustment under section 801(b)(2)(C).
May 17, 2016. three tiers based on their gross receipts Motion at 1, 6–7. Section 801(b)(2)(C)
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
(small, medium, and large). 17 U.S.C. provides for adjustment proceedings 4 in
comments via email to crb@loc.gov or 111(d)(1)(B) through (F). Both the the event the Federal Communications
online at http://www.regulations.gov. applicable rates and the tiers are subject Commission (FCC) changes its rule
Those who choose not to submit to adjustment. 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(2). ‘‘with respect to . . . sports program
Every five years persons with a exclusivity. . . .’’ The JSC base their
comments electronically should see
significant interest in the royalty rates November 23, 2015 petition on an FCC
How to Submit Comments in the
may file petitions to initiate a rule change, viz., repeal of the sports
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
proceeding to adjust the rates. 17 U.S.C. exclusivity rules, effective November
below for physical addresses and further
804(a) and (b). No person with a 24, 2014.5 The Judges announce
instructions. The proposed rule is also
significant interest filed a petition to
posted on the agency’s Web site
initiate a proceeding in 2015.1 2 The Phase I Parties consist of Program
(www.loc.gov/crb). Suppliers, Joint Sports Claimants, Public Television
Therefore, the Judges initiated this rate
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: adjustment proceeding by notice Claimants, Commercial Television Claimants,
Kimberly Whittle, Attorney Advisor, by Music Claimants, Canadian Claimants Group,
published in the Federal Register in National Public Radio, and Devotional Claimants.
telephone at (202) 707–7658, or by June 2015. See 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(2), 3 Joint Sports Claimants are: The National
email at crb@loc.gov. 803(b)(1), 804(a) and (b); 80 FR 35403 Basketball Association, the National Collegiate
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (Jun. 19, 2015). Athletic Association, the National Football League,
the National Hockey League, the Office of the
Background The Judges received two joint Commissioner of Baseball, and the Women’s
Petitions to Participate, one from the National Basketball Association.
On January 15, 2016, the Copyright 4 Apart from the quinquennial proceedings
Royalty Judges (Judges) received a 1 The cable rates were last adjusted in 2005, at a required by § 804 of the Act.
motion from the National Cable & time when the Copyright Office was transferring 5 Petition of the Joint Sports Claimants to Initiate
Telecommunications Association, the responsibility for royalty rate proceedings from Cable Royalty Rate Adjustment Proceedings (Nov.
Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels (CARP) to the 23, 2015). In its petition, JSC requests that the
American Cable Association, and a newly authorized Copyright Royalty Judges. Judges ‘‘initiate proceedings to adjust the cable
group referring to itself as the ‘‘Phase I Although the Judges commenced a rate proceeding statutory license royalty rates ‘to assure that such
Parties’’ requesting that the Judges adopt relating to the 2010 rate adjustment, the Judges rates are reasonable in light of’ the repeal of the
a partial settlement of the movants’ terminated it when passage of the Satellite Sports Blackout Rules.’’ Petition at 1. In its Motion
Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010, to Adopt Partial Settlement, the self-styled
interests regarding royalty rates and Public Law 111–151, 124 Stat. 1027 (‘‘2010 ‘‘Participating Parties,’’ which includes JSC, states
terms for the statutory copyright license STELA’’), rendered the proceeding unnecessary. that ‘‘[t]he Joint Sports Rule Petition requests a new
for eligible cable retransmissions for the See Order Granting Request to Terminate Section 111 royalty rate pursuant to 17 U.S.C.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSAL
period 2015–2019. The settlement Proceeding, Docket No. 2010–1 CRB Cable Rate 801(b)(2)(C) to account for the November 2014
(July 13, 2010). At that time, although the act elimination of the [FCC’s] Sports Rule (a ‘‘Sports
proposes that the rates, terms, and gross changed the relevant rates, neither the Register of Rule Surcharge’’). Motion at 1–2. According to the
receipts limitations remain the same as Copyrights nor the Judges updated the statement of Motion, ‘‘[n]either the Judges nor their predecessors
those currently in effect. See 17 U.S.C. the prior rates in subsections (a) and (b) of section have previously conducted any proceeding under
111(d)(1)(B) and 37 CFR 256.2(c)–(d). 256 of 37 CFR, the chapter of the Regulations Section 801(b)(2)(C) to consider the adoption of a
applying to CARP. The STELA Reauthorization Act cable rate to account for changes in the FCC Sports
Motion of the Participating Parties to of 2014 did not change the cable royalty rates in Rule,’’ although Section 801(b)(2)(C) has been
Adopt Partial Settlement, Docket No. § 111. See Public Law 113–200, 28 Stat. 2059 (Dec. invoked twice since its enactment with respect to
15–CRB–0010–CA (2015–2019) 4, 2014). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Apr 25, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_24603/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2016 / Proposed Rules 24525
located outside the 35-mile specified ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION making effective comments, please visit
zone of a commercial VHF station that AGENCY http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
places a predicted Grade B contour, in commenting-epa-dockets.
whole or in part, over the cable system, 40 CFR Part 52 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and that is not significantly viewed or [EPA–R08–OAR–2013–0561, FRL–9945–57– Abby Fulton, Air Program, U.S.
otherwise exempt from the FCC’s Region 8] Environmental Protection Agency
syndicated exclusivity rules in effect on (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
June 24, 1981, for each distant signal Promulgation of State Implementation 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
equivalent or fraction thereof Plan Revisions; Infrastructure 80202–1129, (303) 312–6563,
represented by the carriage of such Requirements for the 2008 Lead, 2008 fulton.abby@epa.gov.
Ozone, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, and 2012 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
commercial VHF station, the royalty rate
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
shall be, in addition to the amount I. General Information
Standards; Utah
specified in paragraph (a) of this
section, AGENCY: Environmental Protection What should I consider as I prepare my
Agency (EPA). comments for the EPA?
(1) For cable systems located wholly
ACTION: Proposed rule. 1. Submitting Confidential Business
or in part within a top 50 television
Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to
market, SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection the EPA through http://
(i) 0.599 percent of such gross receipts Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
for the first distant signal equivalent; elements of State Implementation Plan mark the part or all of the information
(SIP) revisions from the State of Utah to that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
(ii) 0.377 percent of such gross
demonstrate the State meets information on a disk or CD ROM that
receipts for each of the second, third,
infrastructure requirements of the Clean you mail to the EPA, mark the outside
and fourth distant signal equivalents; Air Act (Act or CAA) for the National
and of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
Ambient Air Quality Standards identify electronically within the disk or
(iii) 0.178 percent of such gross (NAAQS) promulgated for ozone on CD ROM the specific information that is
receipts for the fifth distant signal March 12, 2008, lead (Pb) on October claimed as CBI. In addition to one
equivalent and each additional distant 15, 2008, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) on complete version of the comment that
signal equivalent thereafter; January 22, 2010, sulfur dioxide (SO2) includes information claimed as CBI, a
(2) For cable systems located wholly on June 2, 2010 and fine particulate copy of the comment that does not
matter (PM2.5) on December 14, 2012. contain the information claimed as CBI
or in part within a second 50 television
The EPA is also proposing to approve must be submitted for inclusion in the
market,
SIP revisions the State submitted public docket. Information so marked
(i) 0.300 percent of such gross receipts regarding state boards. Section 110(a) of will not be disclosed except in
for the first distant signal equivalent; the CAA requires that each state submit accordance with procedures set forth in
(ii) 0.189 percent of such gross a SIP for the implementation, 40 CFR part 2.
receipts for each of the second, third, maintenance, and enforcement of each 2. Tips for preparing your comments.
and fourth distant signal equivalents; NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. When submitting comments, remember
and DATES: Written comments must be to:
received on or before May 26, 2016. • Identify the rulemaking by docket
(iii) 0.089 percent of such gross number and other identifying
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
receipts for the fifth distant signal information (subject heading, Federal
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
equivalent and each additional distant OAR–2013–0561 at http:// Register volume, date, and page
signal equivalent thereafter; www.regulations.gov. Follow the online number);
(3) For purposes of this section ‘‘top instructions for submitting comments. • Follow directions and organize your
50 television markets’’ and ‘‘second 50 Once submitted, comments cannot be comments;
television markets’’ shall be defined as edited or removed from Regulations.gov. • Explain why you agree or disagree;
The EPA may publish any comment • Suggest alternatives and substitute
the comparable terms are defined or
received to its public docket. Do not language for your requested changes;
interpreted in accordance with 47 CFR • Describe any assumptions and
76.51, as effective June 24, 1981. submit electronically any information
provide any technical information and/
you consider to be Confidential
(e) Computation of rates. Computation or data that you used;
Business Information (CBI) or other • If you estimate potential costs or
of royalty fees shall be governed by 17
information whose disclosure is burdens, explain how you arrived at
U.S.C. 111(d)(1)(C).
restricted by statute. Multimedia your estimate in sufficient detail to
Dated: April 20, 2016. submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be allow for it to be reproduced;
Suzanne M. Barnett, accompanied by a written comment. • Provide specific examples to
Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. The written comment is considered the illustrate your concerns, and suggest
[FR Doc. 2016–09626 Filed 4–25–16; 8:45 am]
official comment and should include alternatives;
discussion of all points you wish to • Explain your views as clearly as
BILLING CODE 1410–72–P
make. The EPA will generally not possible, avoiding the use of profanity
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSAL
consider comments or comment or personal threats; and,
contents located outside of the primary • Make sure to submit your
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or comments by the comment period
other file sharing system). For deadline identified.
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy, II. Background
information about CBI or multimedia On March 12, 2008, the EPA
submissions, and general guidance on promulgated a new NAAQS for ozone,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Apr 25, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_24603/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-04-26 01:36:01
Document Modified: 2016-04-26 01:36:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments are due no later than May 17, 2016. | |
| Contact | Kimberly Whittle, Attorney Advisor, by telephone at (202) 707-7658, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 24523 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR