81_FR_24715 81 FR 24635 - Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest

81 FR 24635 - Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 80 (April 26, 2016)

Page Range24635-24636
FR Document2016-09611

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Air Mattress Bed Systems and Components Thereof DN 3143; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing under section 210.8(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.8(b)).

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24635-24636]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09611]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating 
to the Public Interest

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Air Mattress Bed 
Systems and Components Thereof DN 3143; the Commission is soliciting 
comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or 
complainant's filing under section 210.8(b) of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.8(b)).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the 
Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. The public version of 
the complaint can be accessed on the Commission's Electronic Document 
Information System (EDIS) at EDIS \1\, and will be available for 
inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in 
the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained 
by accessing its Internet server at United States International Trade 
Commission (USITC) at USITC \2\. The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's Electronic Document 
Information System (EDIS) at EDIS \3\. Hearing-impaired persons are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ United States International Trade Commission (USITC): http://edis.usitc.gov.
    \3\ Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission has received a complaint and 
a submission pursuant to section 210.8(b) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure filed on behalf of Select Comfort Corporation 
and Select Comfort SC Corporation on April 20, 2016. The complaint 
alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain air mattress bed systems and components thereof. The complaint 
names as respondents American National Manufacturing Inc. of Corona, 
CA; Elements of Rest Inc. of Atlanta, GA; Responsive Surface Technology 
LLC of Atlanta, GA; and Dires LLC d/b/a Personal Comfort Bed of 
Orlando, FL. The complainant requests that the Commission issue a 
limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders and impose a bond upon 
respondents' alleged infringing articles during the 60-day Presidential 
review period pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337(j).
    Proposed respondents, other interested parties, and members of the 
public are invited to file comments, not to exceed five (5) pages in 
length, inclusive of attachments, on any public interest issues raised 
by the complaint or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments should address 
whether issuance of the relief specifically requested by the 
complainant in this investigation would affect the public health and 
welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United 
States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles 
in the United States, or United States consumers.
    In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that:
    (i) explain how the articles potentially subject to the requested 
remedial orders are used in the United States;
    (ii) identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the 
United States relating to the requested remedial orders;
    (iii) identify like or directly competitive articles that 
complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States 
which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded;
    (iv) indicate whether complainant, complainant's licensees, and/or 
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of 
articles potentially subject to the requested exclusion order and/or a 
cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time; and
    (v) explain how the requested remedial orders would impact United 
States consumers.
    Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of 
business, eight calendar days after the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for 
comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial 
determination in this investigation.
    Persons filing written submissions must file the original document 
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day 
pursuant to section

[[Page 24636]]

210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the docket number (``Docket No. 
3143'') in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. 
(See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic Filing 
Procedures \4\). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact 
the Secretary (202-205-2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in 
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests 
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include 
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such 
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment 
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All 
nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public 
inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS \5\.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec.  1337), and of sections 
201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR Sec. Sec.  201.10, 210.8(c)).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: April 20, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-09611 Filed 4-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2016 / Notices                                                24635

                                                                                                                        Responses
                                                      Information           Number of            Frequency of                              Burden hour per      Annual burden         Hourly cost
                                                                                                                           per                                                                      Annual cost
                                                       collection          respondents             response                                   response             hours             per response
                                                                                                                         annum

                                                  HUD–52675 ........                 3937     Monthly ...............           47,244    0.0833 Hours or                  26,177          $21.03      $550.502
                                                                                                                                            5 minutes per
                                                                                                                                            family.



                                                  B. Solicitation of Public Comment                         FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:      Lisa            day Presidential review period pursuant
                                                     This notice is soliciting comments                     R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission,               to 19 U.S.C. §1337(j).
                                                  from members of the public and affected                   U.S. International Trade Commission,                     Proposed respondents, other
                                                  parties concerning the collection of                      500 E Street SW., Washington, DC                      interested parties, and members of the
                                                  information described in Section A on                     20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The                  public are invited to file comments, not
                                                  the following:                                            public version of the complaint can be                to exceed five (5) pages in length,
                                                     (1) Whether the proposed collection                    accessed on the Commission’s                          inclusive of attachments, on any public
                                                  of information is necessary for the                       Electronic Document Information                       interest issues raised by the complaint
                                                  proper performance of the functions of                    System (EDIS) at EDIS 1, and will be                  or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments
                                                  the agency, including whether the                         available for inspection during official              should address whether issuance of the
                                                  information will have practical utility;                  business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)               relief specifically requested by the
                                                     (2) The accuracy of the agency’s                       in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.                  complainant in this investigation would
                                                  estimate of the burden of the proposed                    International Trade Commission, 500 E                 affect the public health and welfare in
                                                  collection of information;                                Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                     the United States, competitive
                                                     (3) Ways to enhance the quality,                       telephone (202) 205–2000.                             conditions in the United States
                                                  utility, and clarity of the information to                   General information concerning the                 economy, the production of like or
                                                  be collected; and                                         Commission may also be obtained by                    directly competitive articles in the
                                                     (4) Ways to minimize the burden of                     accessing its Internet server at United               United States, or United States
                                                  the collection of information on those                    States International Trade Commission                 consumers.
                                                  who are to respond; including through                     (USITC) at USITC 2. The public record                    In particular, the Commission is
                                                  the use of appropriate automated                          for this investigation may be viewed on               interested in comments that:
                                                  collection techniques or other forms of                   the Commission’s Electronic Document                     (i) explain how the articles potentially
                                                  information technology, e.g., permitting                  Information System (EDIS) at EDIS 3.                  subject to the requested remedial orders
                                                  electronic submission of responses.                       Hearing-impaired persons are advised                  are used in the United States;
                                                     HUD encourages interested parties to                   that information on this matter can be                   (ii) identify any public health, safety,
                                                  submit comment in response to these                       obtained by contacting the                            or welfare concerns in the United States
                                                  questions.                                                Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)                    relating to the requested remedial
                                                    Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork                205–1810.                                             orders;
                                                  Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                           (iii) identify like or directly
                                                                                                            Commission has received a complaint                   competitive articles that complainant,
                                                    Dated: April 14, 2016.
                                                                                                            and a submission pursuant to section                  its licensees, or third parties make in the
                                                  Merrie Nichols-Dixon,
                                                                                                            210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of                 United States which could replace the
                                                  Deputy Director, Office of Policy, Programs               Practice and Procedure filed on behalf                subject articles if they were to be
                                                  and Legislative Initiatives.
                                                                                                            of Select Comfort Corporation and                     excluded;
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–09605 Filed 4–25–16; 8:45 am]               Select Comfort SC Corporation on April                   (iv) indicate whether complainant,
                                                  BILLING CODE 4210–67–P                                    20, 2016. The complaint alleges                       complainant’s licensees, and/or third
                                                                                                            violations of section 337 of the Tariff               party suppliers have the capacity to
                                                                                                            Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the                   replace the volume of articles
                                                  INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                       importation into the United States, the               potentially subject to the requested
                                                  COMMISSION                                                sale for importation, and the sale within             exclusion order and/or a cease and
                                                                                                            the United States after importation of                desist order within a commercially
                                                  Notice of Receipt of Complaint;                           certain air mattress bed systems and                  reasonable time; and
                                                  Solicitation of Comments Relating to                      components thereof. The complaint                        (v) explain how the requested
                                                  the Public Interest                                       names as respondents American                         remedial orders would impact United
                                                  AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                          National Manufacturing Inc. of Corona,                States consumers.
                                                  Commission.                                               CA; Elements of Rest Inc. of Atlanta,                    Written submissions must be filed no
                                                  ACTION: Notice.                                           GA; Responsive Surface Technology                     later than by close of business, eight
                                                                                                            LLC of Atlanta, GA; and Dires LLC                     calendar days after the date of
                                                  SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that                    d/b/a Personal Comfort Bed of Orlando,                publication of this notice in the Federal
                                                  the U.S. International Trade                              FL. The complainant requests that the                 Register. There will be further
                                                  Commission has received a complaint                       Commission issue a limited exclusion                  opportunities for comment on the
                                                  entitled Certain Air Mattress Bed                         order, cease and desist orders and                    public interest after the issuance of any
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Systems and Components Thereof DN                         impose a bond upon respondents’                       final initial determination in this
                                                  3143; the Commission is soliciting                        alleged infringing articles during the 60-            investigation.
                                                  comments on any public interest issues                                                                             Persons filing written submissions
                                                  raised by the complaint or                                  1 Electronic Document Information System
                                                                                                                                                                  must file the original document
                                                  complainant’s filing under section                        (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.                        electronically on or before the deadlines
                                                                                                              2 United States International Trade Commission
                                                  210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of                     (USITC): http://edis.usitc.gov.                       stated above and submit 8 true paper
                                                  Practice and Procedure (19 CFR                              3 Electronic Document Information System            copies to the Office of the Secretary by
                                                  210.8(b)).                                                (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.                        noon the next day pursuant to section


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014    22:08 Apr 25, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000    Frm 00082   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM    26APN1


                                                  24636                          Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2016 / Notices

                                                  210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of                   and St. Mary’s Medical Center, Inc.                   NATURE OF THE ACTION
                                                  Practice and Procedure (19 CFR                          unlawfully agreed to allocate territories                1. Defendants CAMC and St. Mary’s
                                                  210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to                  for the marketing of competing                        are healthcare providers that operate
                                                  the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 3143’’)                 healthcare services and unlawfully                    general acute-care hospitals in
                                                  in a prominent place on the cover page                  limited competition. The proposed                     Charleston, Kanawha County, West
                                                  and/or the first page. (See Handbook for                Final Judgment, filed at the same time                Virginia, and Huntington, Cabell
                                                  Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic                as the Complaint, enjoins Defendants                  County, West Virginia, respectively.
                                                  Filing Procedures 4). Persons with                      from limiting competition in this                     CAMC and St. Mary’s compete with
                                                  questions regarding filing should                       manner and requires Defendants to                     each other to provide healthcare
                                                  contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).                   institute comprehensive antitrust                     services. Marketing is a key component
                                                     Any person desiring to submit a                      compliance programs to ensure that                    of this competition and includes both
                                                  document to the Commission in                           Defendants do not establish similar                   print and outdoor advertising, such as
                                                  confidence must request confidential                    unlawful agreements and similar                       newspaper advertisements and
                                                  treatment. All such requests should be                  limitations on competition in the future.             billboards.
                                                  directed to the Secretary to the                           Copies of the Complaint, proposed                     2. CAMC and St. Mary’s agreed to
                                                  Commission and must include a full                      Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact                limit marketing of competing healthcare
                                                  statement of the reasons why the                        Statement are available for inspection                services. According to St. Mary’s
                                                  Commission should grant such                            on the Antitrust Division’s Web site at               Director of Marketing, St. Mary’s ‘‘had
                                                  treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents                  http://www.justice.gov/atr and at the                 an agreement with CAMC that St.
                                                  for which confidential treatment by the                 Office of the Clerk of the United States              Mary’s would not advertise on
                                                  Commission is properly sought will be                   District Court for the Southern District              billboards or in print in Kanawha
                                                  treated accordingly. All nonconfidential                of West Virginia. Copies of these                     County and that CAMC would not
                                                  written submissions will be available for               materials may be obtained from the                    advertise on billboards or in print in
                                                  public inspection at the Office of the                  Antitrust Division upon request and                   Cabell County.’’ He also testified that
                                                  Secretary and on EDIS 5.                                payment of the copying fee set by                     ‘‘the agreement between St. Mary’s and
                                                     This action is taken under the                       Department of Justice regulations.                    CAMC is still in place today.’’
                                                  authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act                 Public comment is invited within 60                   3. Defendants’ agreement has
                                                  of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337),                 days of the date of this notice. Such                 disrupted the competitive process and
                                                  and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of                  comments, including the name of the                   harmed patients and physicians. Among
                                                  the Commission’s Rules of Practice and                  submitter, and responses thereto, will be             other things, the agreement has
                                                  Procedure (19 CFR §§ 201.10, 210.8(c)).                 posted on the Antitrust Division’s Web                deprived patients of information they
                                                    By order of the Commission.                           site, filed with the Court, and, under                otherwise would have had when making
                                                    Issued: April 20, 2016.                               certain circumstances, published in the               important healthcare decisions and has
                                                  Lisa R. Barton,                                         Federal Register. Comments should be                  denied physicians working for the
                                                  Secretary to the Commission.                            directed to Peter Mucchetti, Chief,                   Defendants the opportunity to advertise
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–09611 Filed 4–25–16; 8:45 am]             Litigation I, Antitrust Division,                     their services to potential patients.
                                                  BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                  Department of Justice, 450 Fifth Street                  4. Defendants’ agreement is a naked
                                                                                                          NW., Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20530                 restraint of trade that is per se unlawful
                                                                                                          (telephone: 202–307–0001).                            under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                   Patricia A. Brink
                                                                                                                                                                U.S.C. 1.
                                                                                                          Director of Civil Enforcement.                        JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND
                                                  Antitrust Division                                                                                            INTERSTATE COMMERCE
                                                                                                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                                  United States v. Charleston Area                                                                                 5. The United States brings this action
                                                  Medical Center, Inc. and St. Mary’s                     FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
                                                                                                                                                                pursuant to Section 4 of the Sherman
                                                  Medical Center, Inc.: Proposed Final                    WEST VIRGINIA
                                                                                                                                                                Act, 15 U.S.C. 4, to prevent and restrain
                                                  Judgment and Competitive Impact                         CHARLESTON DIVISION                                   Defendants’ violations of Section 1 of
                                                  Statement                                                                                                     the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1.
                                                                                                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                                                          Plaintiff, v. CHARLESTON AREA                            6. This Court has subject matter
                                                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to the                                                                      jurisdiction over this action under
                                                  Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,                 MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and ST.
                                                                                                          MARY’S MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,                          Section 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.
                                                  15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed                                                                          4, and 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1337(a), 1345,
                                                  Final Judgment, Stipulation, and                        Defendants.
                                                                                                                                                                and 1367.
                                                  Competitive Impact Statement have                       CASE NO.: 2:16–cv–03664                                  7. Venue is proper in the Southern
                                                  been filed with the United States                       JUDGE: John T. Copenhaver, Jr.                        District of West Virginia, Charleston
                                                  District Court for the Southern District                FILED: 04/14/2016                                     Division, under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and
                                                  of West Virginia in United States of                                                                          Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.
                                                  America v. Charleston Area Medical                      COMPLAINT
                                                                                                                                                                22. Each Defendant transacts business
                                                  Center, Inc. and St. Mary’s Medical                       The United States of America brings                 within the Southern District of West
                                                  Center, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:16–cv–                 this civil antitrust action to enjoin an              Virginia, and all Defendants reside in
                                                  03664. On April 14, 2016, the United
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                          agreement by Charleston Area Medical                  the Southern District of West Virginia.
                                                  States filed a Complaint alleging that                  Center, Inc. (‘‘CAMC’’) and St. Mary’s                   8. Defendants engage in interstate
                                                  Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.                    Medical Center, Inc. (‘‘St. Mary’s)                   commerce and in activities substantially
                                                                                                          (collectively, ‘‘Defendants’’) that                   affecting interstate commerce.
                                                    4 Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures:
                                                                                                          unlawfully allocated territories for the              Defendants provide healthcare services
                                                  http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/
                                                  rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf.                marketing of competing healthcare                     to patients for which employers, health
                                                    5 Electronic Document Information System              services and limited competition                      plans, and individual patients remit
                                                  (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.                          between the Defendants.                               payments across state lines. Defendants


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   22:08 Apr 25, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00083   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM   26APN1



Document Created: 2016-04-26 01:36:32
Document Modified: 2016-04-26 01:36:32
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactLisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. The public version of the complaint can be accessed on the Commission's Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at EDIS \1\, and will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000.
FR Citation81 FR 24635 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR