81 FR 27015 - Anchorage Regulations; Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 87 (May 5, 2016)

Page Range		27015-27017
FR Document		2016-10577

The Coast Guard is amending the geographic coordinates and modifying the regulated use of anchorage ``10'' in the Delaware River in the vicinity of the Navy Yard in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The change alters the size and use of the anchorage, reducing the anchorage in size and allowing the anchorage to be used as a general anchorage ground in the Delaware River.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27015-27017]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10577]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 110

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0825]
RIN 1625-AA01


Anchorage Regulations; Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending the geographic coordinates and 
modifying the regulated use of anchorage ``10'' in the Delaware River 
in the vicinity of the Navy Yard in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The 
change alters the size and use of the anchorage, reducing the anchorage 
in size and allowing the anchorage to be used as a general anchorage 
ground in the Delaware River.

DATES: This rule is effective June 6, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-0825 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

[[Page 27016]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Brennan Dougherty, U.S. Coast 
Guard Sector Delaware Bay, Chief Waterways Management Division; 
telephone (215) 271-4851, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On December 12, 1967, the Coast Guard published a final rule (32 FR 
17726, 17749) establishing an anchorage ground on the Delaware River in 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 33 CFR part 110. The anchorage ground 
established is contained in 33 CFR 110.157(a)(11). The anchorage 
currently remains unused by the Navy Yard. Removing the restrictions on 
anchorage ``10'' will alleviate congestion within the port, allowing 
the anchorage to be used as a general anchorage for commercial traffic.
    On January 5, 2016, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Anchorage Regulations, Delaware River; 
Philadelphia, PA (81 FR 194). It proposed to change the shape and the 
dimensions of anchorage ``10'', and to remove the ``restricted naval 
anchorage'' verbiage from Sec.  110.157(a)(11). We invited comments on 
this proposed change. During the comment period that ended February 4, 
2016, we received no public comments, but we did receive a comment from 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) which we discuss 
below.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
471, 1221 through 1236, and 2071; and in 33 CFR 1.05-1.
    This rule changes the shape and the dimensions of anchorage ``10.'' 
The anchorage currently remains unused by the Navy Yard. Removing the 
restrictions on anchorage ``10'' will alleviate congestion within the 
port by allowing the anchorage to be used as a general anchorage ground 
for commercial traffic.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no public comments on our NPRM 
published January 5, 2016. Based on comments from NOAA, however, we 
make two changes in the regulatory text of this rule from our proposed.
    The first change identifies the horizontal reference datum for the 
latitudes and longitudes of the boundaries of the anchorage grounds as 
the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84). The second change replaces the 
verbiage ``West Horseshoe Range'' with ``Eagle Point Range'' within the 
anchorage rule text. The original anchorage regulation, 33 CFR 
110.157(a)(11) Anchorage 10, uses ``West Horseshoe Range'' as a 
boundary reference, however, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA) Nautical Charts identifies the range as ``Eagle 
Point Range''. Therefore, we changed the boundary reference in our rule 
from ``West Horseshoe Range'' to ``Eagle Point Range.''
    The revised anchorage ground runs parallel to the north side of the 
channel along Eagle Point range, is narrower north to south, and is 
slightly longer east to west than the existing anchorage ground. 
Additionally, as proposed, we removed the ``restricted naval 
anchorage'' verbiage from the regulation. This permits commercial and 
other vessels to anchor within its bounds. The regulatory text appears 
at the end of this document.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has 
not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This rule is not a significant regulatory action because it will 
not interfere with existing maritime activity on the Delaware River. 
Moreover, it enhances navigational safety along the Delaware River by 
providing an additional anchorage for commercial and recreational 
vessels. The anchorage maintains the same parallel distance along the 
channel boundaries as the existing anchorage. The impacts to 
navigational safety are expected to be minimal because the anchorage 
area will not unnecessarily restrict traffic, as it is located outside 
of the established navigation channel. Vessels may navigate in, around, 
and through the anchorage.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit or 
use the anchorage may be small entities, for the reasons stated in 
section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule does affect your small 
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against

[[Page 27017]]

small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy 
or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive 
Order13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary 
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do 
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves the alteration of the size and use of 
anchorage ``10,'' restricted Naval Anchorage. It is categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(f) of Figure 2-1 of 
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. An environmental analysis checklist 
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination 
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek 
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a 
significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110

    Anchorage grounds.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 110 as follows:

PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-
1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Revise Sec.  110.157(a)(11) to read as follows:


Sec.  110.157  Delaware Bay and River.

    (a) * * *
    (11) Anchorage 10 at Naval Base, Philadelphia. On the north side of 
the channel along Eagle Point Range, bounded as follows: Beginning off 
of the southeasterly corner of Pier 1 at 39[deg]53'07'' N., 
075[deg]10'30'' W., thence south to the to the north edge of the 
channel along Eagle Point Range to 39[deg]52'58'' N., 075[deg]10'29'' 
W., thence east along the edge of the channel to 39[deg]52'56'' N., 
075[deg]09'53'' W., thence north to 39[deg]53'07'' N., 075[deg]09'54'' 
W., thence continuing west to the beginning point at 39[deg]53'07'' N., 
075[deg]10'30'' W. These coordinates are based on WGS 84.
* * * * *

    Dated: April 22, 2016.
Robert J. Tarantino,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 2016-10577 Filed 5-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

27016 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, on the Delaware River. Moreover, it
you have questions about this and the Rule enhances navigational safety along the
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant As noted above, we received no Delaware River by providing an
Brennan Dougherty, U.S. Coast Guard public comments on our NPRM additional anchorage for commercial
Sector Delaware Bay, Chief Waterways published January 5, 2016. Based on and recreational vessels. The anchorage
Management Division; telephone (215) maintains the same parallel distance
comments from NOAA, however, we
271–4851, email Brennan.P.Dougherty@ along the channel boundaries as the
make two changes in the regulatory text
uscg.mil. existing anchorage. The impacts to
of this rule from our proposed.
navigational safety are expected to be
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The first change identifies the
minimal because the anchorage area
horizontal reference datum for the
I. Table of Abbreviations will not unnecessarily restrict traffic, as
latitudes and longitudes of the
it is located outside of the established
CFR Code of Federal Regulations boundaries of the anchorage grounds as
navigation channel. Vessels may
DHS Department of Homeland Security the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS
navigate in, around, and through the
FR Federal Register 84). The second change replaces the
anchorage.
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking verbiage ‘‘West Horseshoe Range’’ with
§ Section ‘‘Eagle Point Range’’ within the B. Impact on Small Entities
U.S.C. United States Code anchorage rule text. The original The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
COTP Captain of the Port anchorage regulation, 33 CFR 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
110.157(a)(11) Anchorage 10, uses requires Federal agencies to consider
II. Background Information and ‘‘West Horseshoe Range’’ as a boundary the potential impact of regulations on
Regulatory History reference, however, the National small entities during rulemaking. The
Oceanic and Atmospheric term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
On December 12, 1967, the Coast
Administration (NOAA) Nautical Charts businesses, not-for-profit organizations
Guard published a final rule (32 FR
identifies the range as ‘‘Eagle Point that are independently owned and
17726, 17749) establishing an anchorage
Range’’. Therefore, we changed the operated and are not dominant in their
ground on the Delaware River in
boundary reference in our rule from fields, and governmental jurisdictions
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 33 CFR
‘‘West Horseshoe Range’’ to ‘‘Eagle Point with populations of less than 50,000.
part 110. The anchorage ground
Range.’’ The Coast Guard received no comments
established is contained in 33 CFR
The revised anchorage ground runs from the Small Business Administration
110.157(a)(11). The anchorage currently
parallel to the north side of the channel on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
remains unused by the Navy Yard. along Eagle Point range, is narrower certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
Removing the restrictions on anchorage north to south, and is slightly longer rule will not have a significant
‘‘10’’ will alleviate congestion within east to west than the existing anchorage economic impact on a substantial
the port, allowing the anchorage to be ground. Additionally, as proposed, we number of small entities.
used as a general anchorage for removed the ‘‘restricted naval While some owners or operators of
commercial traffic. anchorage’’ verbiage from the vessels intending to transit or use the
On January 5, 2016, the Coast Guard regulation. This permits commercial anchorage may be small entities, for the
published a notice of proposed and other vessels to anchor within its reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Anchorage bounds. The regulatory text appears at rule will not have a significant
Regulations, Delaware River; the end of this document. economic impact on any vessel owner
Philadelphia, PA (81 FR 194). It or operator.
V. Regulatory Analyses Under section 213(a) of the Small
proposed to change the shape and the
dimensions of anchorage ‘‘10’’, and to We developed this rule after Business Regulatory Enforcement
remove the ‘‘restricted naval anchorage’’ considering numerous statutes and Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
verbiage from § 110.157(a)(11). We Executive orders related to rulemaking. we want to assist small entities in
invited comments on this proposed Below we summarize our analyses understanding this rule. If the rule does
change. During the comment period that based on a number of these statutes and affect your small business, organization,
ended February 4, 2016, we received no Executive orders. or governmental jurisdiction and you
public comments, but we did receive a have questions concerning its
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
comment from National Oceanic and provisions or options for compliance,
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies please contact the person listed in the
which we discuss below. to assess the costs and benefits of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
available regulatory alternatives and, if section.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule regulation is necessary, to select Small businesses may send comments
regulatory approaches that maximize on the actions of Federal employees
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the who enforce, or otherwise determine
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 importance of quantifying both costs compliance with, Federal regulations to
through 1236, and 2071; and in 33 CFR and benefits, of reducing costs, of the Small Business and Agriculture
1.05–1. harmonizing rules, and of promoting Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
This rule changes the shape and the flexibility. This rule has not been and the Regional Small Business
dimensions of anchorage ‘‘10.’’ The designated a ‘‘significant regulatory Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
anchorage currently remains unused by action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Ombudsman evaluates these actions
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES

the Navy Yard. Removing the Accordingly, it has not been reviewed annually and rates each agency’s
restrictions on anchorage ‘‘10’’ will by the Office of Management and responsiveness to small business. If you
alleviate congestion within the port by Budget. wish to comment on actions by
allowing the anchorage to be used as a This rule is not a significant employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
general anchorage ground for regulatory action because it will not 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
commercial traffic. interfere with existing maritime activity Coast Guard will not retaliate against

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:35 May 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM 05MYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 27017

small entities that question or complain environment. This rule involves the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
about this rule or any policy or action alteration of the size and use of AGENCY
of the Coast Guard. anchorage ‘‘10,’’ restricted Naval
Anchorage. It is categorically excluded 40 CFR Part 52
C. Collection of Information
from further review under paragraph [EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0855; FRL–9946–00–
This rule will not call for a new 34(f) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant Region 10]
collection of information under the Instruction M16475.lD. An
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Approval and Promulgation of
environmental analysis checklist
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Implementation Plans; Idaho:
supporting this determination and a
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Categorical Exclusion Determination are Interstate Transport Requirements for
Governments the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National
available in the docket where indicated
Ambient Air Quality Standards
A rule has implications for federalism under ADDRESSES. We seek any
under Executive Order 13132, comments or information that may lead AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct to the discovery of a significant Agency (EPA).
effect on the States, on the relationship environmental impact from this rule. ACTION: Final rule.
between the national government and
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110 SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
the States, or on the distribution of
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
power and responsibilities among the Anchorage grounds. approve a submittal by the Idaho
various levels of government. We have
For the reasons discussed in the Department of Environmental Quality
analyzed this rule under that Order and
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 (Idaho DEQ) demonstrating that the
have determined that it is consistent
CFR part 110 as follows: State Implementation Plan (SIP) meets
with the fundamental federalism
certain interstate transport requirements
principles and preemption requirements
PART 110—ANCHORAGE of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the
described in Executive Order13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal REGULATIONS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) promulgated for nitrogen
implications under Executive Order
1. The authority citation for part 110 dioxide (NO2) on January 22, 2010.
13175, Consultation and Coordination ■
Specifically, the Idaho DEQ reviewed
with Indian Tribal Governments, continues to read as follows:
monitoring and modeling data to show
because it does not have a substantial Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through that sources within Idaho do not
direct effect on one or more Indian 1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of significantly contribute to
tribes, on the relationship between the Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. nonattainment, or interfere with
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
maintenance, of the NO2 NAAQS in any
or on the distribution of power and ■ 2. Revise § 110.157(a)(11) to read as other state.
responsibilities between the Federal follows: DATES: This action is effective on June
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for § 110.157 Delaware Bay and River. 6, 2016.
federalism or Indian tribes, please ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
(a) * * * docket for this action under Docket ID
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. (11) Anchorage 10 at Naval Base, No. EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0855. All
Philadelphia. On the north side of the documents in the docket are listed on
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act channel along Eagle Point Range, the http://www.regulations.gov Web
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act bounded as follows: Beginning off of the site. Although listed in the index, some
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires southeasterly corner of Pier 1 at information may not be publicly
Federal agencies to assess the effects of 39°53′07″ N., 075°10′30″ W., thence available, i.e., Confidential Business
their discretionary regulatory actions. In south to the to the north edge of the Information or other information the
particular, the Act addresses actions disclosure of which is restricted by
channel along Eagle Point Range to
that may result in the expenditure by a statute. Certain other material, such as
39°52′58″ N., 075°10′29″ W., thence east
State, local, or tribal government, in the copyrighted material, is not placed on
along the edge of the channel to the Internet and is publicly available
aggregate, or by the private sector of 39°52′56″ N., 075°09′53″ W., thence
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or only in hard copy form. Publicly
north to 39°53′07″ N., 075°09′54″ W., available docket materials are available
more in any one year. Though this rule
thence continuing west to the beginning at http://www.regulations.gov or at EPA
will not result in such an expenditure,
point at 39°53′07″ N., 075°10′30″ W. Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and
we do discuss the effects of this rule
These coordinates are based on WGS 84. Toxics, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
elsewhere in this preamble.
* * * * * Washington 98101. The EPA requests
F. Environment that you contact the person listed in the
Dated: April 22, 2016.
We have analyzed this rule under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Robert J. Tarantino, section to schedule your inspection. The
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Regional Office’s official hours of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District. business are Monday through Friday,
which guide the Coast Guard in [FR Doc. 2016–10577 Filed 5–4–16; 8:45 am] 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
complying with the National BILLING CODE 9110–04–P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 information please contact John Chi at
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a (206) 553–1185, or chi.john@epa.gov.
preliminary determination that this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
action is one of a category of actions that Throughout this document whenever
do not individually or cumulatively ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
have a significant effect on the human intended to refer to the EPA.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:35 May 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM 05MYR1

Document Created: 2016-05-05 01:15:41
Document Modified: 2016-05-05 01:15:41

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective June 6, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Brennan Dougherty, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay, Chief Waterways Management Division; telephone (215) 271-4851, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 27015
RIN Number		1625-AA01

81 FR 27015 - Anchorage Regulations; Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 87 (May 5, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard