81 FR 27049 - Revision of Regulations Governing Freedom of Information Act Requests and Appeals, and Revision of Touhy Regulations Governing Release of Information in Response to Legal Proceedings

OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 87 (May 5, 2016)

Page Range		27049-27054
FR Document		2016-09799
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) seeks public comment on a proposed rule that would update and clarify the procedures for submitting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and appeals, and would modify the manner in which FOIA requests qualify for expedited processing at OSC. The proposed rule would describe additional methods for submitting FOIA requests and appeals. It would also promote efficiency in FOIA administration by enhancing OSC's ability to respond to certain requests on an expedited basis. The proposed rule makes minor technical revisions to the name of an OSC unit and to OSC's Internet and physical address information. OSC also seeks public comment on a proposed rule that would establish procedures that requesters must follow when making demands on or requests to an OSC employee to produce official records or provide testimony relating to official information in connection with a legal proceeding in which the OSC is not a party. The proposed rule would also establish procedures to respond to such demands and requests in an orderly and consistent manner. The proposed rule will promote uniformity in decisions, protect confidential information, provide guidance to requesters, and reduce the potential for both inappropriate disclosures of official information and wasteful allocation of agency resources.
Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27049-27054]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09799]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Proposed 
Rules

[[Page 27049]]



OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL

5 CFR Part 1820


Revision of Regulations Governing Freedom of Information Act 
Requests and Appeals, and Revision of Touhy Regulations Governing 
Release of Information in Response to Legal Proceedings

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Special Counsel.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) seeks public comment 
on a proposed rule that would update and clarify the procedures for 
submitting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and appeals, and 
would modify the manner in which FOIA requests qualify for expedited 
processing at OSC. The proposed rule would describe additional methods 
for submitting FOIA requests and appeals. It would also promote 
efficiency in FOIA administration by enhancing OSC's ability to respond 
to certain requests on an expedited basis. The proposed rule makes 
minor technical revisions to the name of an OSC unit and to OSC's 
Internet and physical address information.
    OSC also seeks public comment on a proposed rule that would 
establish procedures that requesters must follow when making demands on 
or requests to an OSC employee to produce official records or provide 
testimony relating to official information in connection with a legal 
proceeding in which the OSC is not a party. The proposed rule would 
also establish procedures to respond to such demands and requests in an 
orderly and consistent manner. The proposed rule will promote 
uniformity in decisions, protect confidential information, provide 
guidance to requesters, and reduce the potential for both inappropriate 
disclosures of official information and wasteful allocation of agency 
resources.

DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received on or before 
July 5, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: [email protected]. Include ``FOIA/Touhy Regulation'' 
in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: (202) 254-3711.
     Mail: U.S. Office of Special Counsel, Office of General 
Counsel, 1730 M Street NW., Suite 218, Washington, DC 20036.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. Office of Special Counsel, 
Office of General Counsel, 1730 M Street NW., Suite 218, Washington, DC 
20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Beckett, Senior Litigation 
Counsel, U.S. Office of Special Counsel, by telephone at (202) 254-
3600, by facsimile at (202) 254-3711, or by email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    FOIA Regulations. The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) proposes 
to revise its FOIA regulations to account for the additional electronic 
methods by which requesters may submit FOIA requests and appeals, and 
to modify the manner by which requests qualify for expedited 
processing. OSC also proposes to make minor technical revisions to the 
name of an OSC unit and to OSC's Internet and physical address 
information.
    The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.2 and 1820.6 describes regular 
mail and fax as the methods by which to submit FOIA requests and 
appeals. The proposed rule would add email or other electronic 
submission methods.
    The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.1 refers to the main OSC 
Internet and FOIA page addresses. The proposed rule would describe 
Internet access to OSC FOIA resources through the main OSC Internet 
address. The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.2 and 1820.6 regarding 
OSC's physical address would be modified in a minor, technical manner. 
The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.6 refers to an OSC unit as the 
``Legal Counsel and Policy Division.'' The name of that unit would be 
updated in the proposed rule to the ``Office of General Counsel.''
    The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.4(c)(1)(iii) discusses one of 
the three criteria under which a FOIA request can be processed out of 
order of receipt and addressed on an expedited basis. That language 
provides, in part, expedited treatment of a FOIA request when the 
requested records relate to ``an appeal that is pending before, or that 
the requester faces an imminent deadline for filing with'' another 
administrative or judicial tribunal, ``seeking personal relief pursuant 
to a complaint filed by the requester with OSC, or referred to OSC 
pursuant to title 38 of the U.S. Code.''
    The proposed rule would clarify that the criteria discussed at 5 
CFR 1820.4(c)(1)(iii) applies only when the requested records relate to 
an appeal for which the requester faces an imminent deadline for filing 
with another administrative or judicial tribunal. In addition, the 
proposed rule would specify that a grant of expedited treatment would 
apply only to the following requested records: Letters sent to a 
complainant by OSC; and the official complaint form submitted to OSC by 
the complainant or the original referred complaint if referred to OSC 
pursuant to title 38 of the U.S. Code. All other requested records 
would be processed according to the order in which OSC received the 
request.
    By narrowing the focus of expedited status to certain records that 
are of interest to complainant-requesters, and are typically readily 
available for disclosure to the complainant-requesters, OSC will be 
able to more efficiently process and respond to expedited requests. Any 
other requested records would generally be processed in the order OSC 
received the request.
    Touhy Regulations. OSC also proposes to revise its regulations 
relating to the release of information in response to requests made in 
connection with legal proceedings, such as summonses, complaints, 
subpoenas, and other litigation-related requests or demands for OSC's 
records or official information. These regulations are often referred 
to as Touhy regulations.
    Federal agencies often receive demands consisting of informal 
requests for production of records, information, or testimony in 
judicial, legislative, or administrative proceedings in which the 
agency is not a named party. OSC has identified a need to revise its 
regulation to improve its evaluation and processing of such requests.

[[Page 27050]]

    The United States Supreme Court upheld this type of regulation in 
United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951), holding that 
provisions in the federal ``housekeeping'' statute authorize agencies 
to promulgate rules governing record production and employee testimony. 
See 5 U.S.C. 301.
    The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.10 refers to the ``[p]roduction 
of official records or testimony in legal proceedings.'' This revision 
provides the agency with more clearly delineated standards for 
releasing information or witness testimony. Generally, this revision 
re-establishes that no OSC employee or former employee shall release 
official information or records without the prior approval of the 
Special Counsel or the Special Counsel's duly authorized designee.
    Under this proposed rule, OSC establishes procedural requirements 
for the form and content of requests for official OSC information made 
through a litigation request or demand, as well as establishing 
procedures for responding to the requests. This proposed rule also 
states the factors that OSC will consider in determining whether to 
authorize a release of official information in response to a request.

Procedural Determinations

    Administrative Procedure Act (APA): This action is taken under the 
Special Counsel's authority at 5 U.S.C. 1212(e) to publish regulations 
in the Federal Register.
    Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review): OSC does 
not anticipate that this proposed rule will have significant economic 
impact, raise novel issues, and/or have any other significant impacts. 
Thus this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
potential costs and benefits under 6(a)(3) of the Order.
    Congressional Review Act (CRA): OSC has determined that this 
proposed rule is not a major rule under the Congressional Review Act, 
as it is unlikely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 
million or more; is unlikely to result in a major increase in costs or 
prices for consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local 
government agencies or geographic regions; and is unlikely to have a 
significant adverse effect on competition, employment, investment, 
productivity, or innovation, or on the ability of U.S.-based 
enterprises to compete in domestic and export markets.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA): The Regulatory Flexibility Act 
does not apply, even though this proposed rule is being offered for 
notice and comment procedures under the APA. This proposed rule will 
not directly regulate small entities. OSC therefore need not perform a 
regulatory flexibility analysis of small entity impacts.
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA): This proposed revision does 
not impose any federal mandates on state, local, or tribal governments, 
or on the private sector within the meaning of the UMRA.
    National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): This proposed rule will 
have no physical impact upon the environment and therefore will not 
require any further review under NEPA.
    Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA): This proposed rule does not impose 
any new recordkeeping, reporting, or other information collection 
requirements on the public. The proposed rule sets forth procedures by 
which litigants may serve summonses, complaints, subpoenas, and other 
legal process, demands, and requests upon the OSC. The proposed rule 
imposes special procedural requirements for those who seek to serve 
third-party subpoenas upon the OSC in accordance with United States ex 
rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). These requirements may 
increase the time and burden associated with obtaining records of the 
OSC in response to such third-party subpoenas.
    Executive Order 13132 (Federalism): This proposed revision does not 
have new federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform): This proposed rule 
meets applicable standards of 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 
12988.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1820

    Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
Government employees, Touhy regulations.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, OSC proposes to revise 5 
CFR part 1820 as follows:

PART 1820--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUESTS; PRODUCTION OF 
RECORDS OR TESTIMONY

0
1. The authority citation for 5 CFR part 1820 is revised to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 552 and 1212(e); Executive Order No. 12600, 
52 FR 23781.

0
2. Revise Sec. Sec.  1820.1 and 1820.2 to read as follows:


Sec.  1820.1  General provisions.

    This part contains rules and procedures followed by the U.S. Office 
of Special Counsel (OSC) in processing requests for records under the 
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as amended, at 5 U.S.C. 552. These 
rules and procedures should be read together with the FOIA, which 
provides additional information about access to agency records. Further 
information about the FOIA and access to OSC records is available on 
the FOIA page of OSC's Web site (https://www.osc.gov). Information 
routinely provided to the public as part of a regular OSC activity--for 
example, forms, press releases issued by the public affairs officer, 
records published on the agency's Web site, or public lists maintained 
at OSC headquarter offices pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1219--may be requested 
and provided to the public without following this part. This part also 
addresses responses to demands by a court or other authority to an 
employee for production of official records or testimony in legal 
proceedings.


Sec.  1820.2  Requirements for making FOIA requests.

    (a) Submission of requests. (1) A request for OSC records under the 
FOIA must be made in writing. The request must be sent by:
    (i) Regular mail addressed to: FOIA Officer, U.S. Office of Special 
Counsel, 1730 M Street NW., Suite 218, Washington, DC 20036-4505; or
    (ii) By fax sent to the FOIA Officer at the number provided on the 
FOIA page of OSC's Web site (https://www.osc.gov); or
    (iii) By email or other electronic means as described on the FOIA 
page of OSC's Web site.
    (2) For the quickest handling, both the request letter and envelope 
or any fax cover sheet or email subject line should be clearly marked 
``FOIA Request.'' Whether sent by mail, fax, email, or other prescribed 
electronic method, a FOIA request will not be considered to have been 
received by OSC until it reaches the FOIA office.
    (b) Description of records sought. Requesters must describe the 
records sought in enough detail for them to be located with a 
reasonable amount of effort. When requesting records about an OSC case 
file, the case file number, name, and type (for example, prohibited 
personnel practice, Hatch Act, USERRA or other complaint; Hatch Act 
advisory opinion; or whistleblower disclosure) should be provided, if 
known. Whenever possible, requests should describe any particular 
record sought, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, and 
subject matter.

[[Page 27051]]

    (c) Agreement to pay fees. Making a FOIA request shall be 
considered an agreement by the requester to pay all applicable fees 
chargeable under Sec.  1820.7, up to and including the amount of 
$25.00, unless the requester asks for a waiver of fees. When making a 
request, a requester may specify a willingness to pay a greater or 
lesser amount.
0
3. Revise Sec.  1820.4 to read as follows:


Sec.  1820.4  Timing of responses to requests.

    (a) In general. OSC ordinarily will respond to FOIA requests 
according to their order of receipt. In determining which records are 
responsive to a request, OSC ordinarily will include only records in 
its possession as of the date on which it begins its search for them. 
If any other date is used, OSC will inform the requester of that date.
    (b) Multitrack processing. (1) OSC may use two or more processing 
tracks by distinguishing between simple and more complex requests based 
on the amount of work and/or time needed to process the request.
    (2) When using multitrack processing, OSC may provide requesters in 
its slower track(s) with an opportunity to limit the scope of their 
requests in order to qualify for faster processing within the specified 
limits of the faster track(s).
    (c) Expedited processing. (1) Requests and appeals will be taken 
out of order and given expedited treatment whenever OSC has established 
to its satisfaction that:
    (i) Failure to obtain requested records on an expedited basis could 
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or 
physical safety of an individual;
    (ii) With respect to a request made by a person primarily engaged 
in disseminating information, an urgency exists to inform the public 
about an actual or alleged federal government activity; or
    (iii) The requested records relate to an appeal for which the 
requester faces an imminent deadline for filing with the Merit Systems 
Protection Board or other administrative tribunal or a court of law, 
seeking personal relief pursuant to a complaint filed by the requester 
with OSC, or referred to OSC pursuant to title 38 of the U.S. Code. 
Expedited status granted under this provision will apply only to the 
following requested records: Letters sent to the complainant by OSC; 
and the official complaint form submitted to OSC by the complainant or 
the original referred complaint if referred to OSC pursuant to title 38 
of the U.S. Code. All other requested records will be processed 
according to the order in which OSC received the request.
    (2) A request for expedited processing must be made in writing and 
sent to OSC's FOIA Officer. Such a request will not be considered to 
have been received until it reaches the FOIA Officer.
    (3) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a 
statement, certified to be true and correct to the best of that 
person's knowledge and belief, explaining in detail the basis for 
requesting expedited processing. For example, a requester within the 
category described in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, if not a 
full-time member of the news media, must establish that he or she is a 
person whose main professional activity or occupation is information 
dissemination, though it need not be his or her sole occupation. The 
formality of certification may be waived as a matter of OSC's 
administrative discretion.
    (4) OSC shall decide whether to grant a request for expedited 
processing and notify the requester of its decision within 10 calendar 
days of the FOIA Officer's receipt of the request. If the request for 
expedited processing is granted, the request for records shall be 
processed as soon as practicable. If a request for expedited processing 
is denied, any administrative appeal of that decision shall be acted on 
expeditiously.
    (d) Aggregated requests. OSC may aggregate multiple requests by the 
same requester, or by a group of requesters acting in concert, if it 
reasonably believes that such requests constitute a single request 
involving unusual circumstances, as defined by the FOIA, supporting an 
extension of time to respond, and the requests involve clearly related 
matters.

0
4. Revise Sec.  1820.6 to read as follows:


Sec.  1820.6  Appeals.

    (a) Appeals of adverse determinations. A requester may appeal an 
adverse determination denying a FOIA request in any respect to the 
Office of General Counsel, U.S. Office of Special Counsel, 1730 M 
Street NW., Suite 218, Washington, DC 20036-4505. The appeal must be in 
writing, and must be submitted either by:
    (1) Regular mail sent to the address listed in this subsection, 
above; or
    (2) By fax sent to the FOIA Officer at the number provided on the 
FOIA page of OSC's Web site (https://www.osc.gov); or
    (3) By other electronic means as described on the FOIA page of 
OSC's Web site.
    (b) Submission and content. The appeal must be received by the 
Office of General Counsel within 45 days of the date of the letter 
denying the request. For the quickest possible handling, the appeal 
letter and envelope or any fax cover sheet should be clearly marked 
``FOIA Appeal.'' The appeal letter must clearly identify the OSC 
determination (including the assigned FOIA request number, if known) 
being appealed. An appeal ordinarily will not be acted on if the 
request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
    (c) Responses to appeals. The agency decision on an appeal will be 
made in writing. A decision affirming an adverse determination in whole 
or in part shall inform the requester of the provisions for judicial 
review of that decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or 
modified on appeal, in whole or in part, the requester will be notified 
in a written decision and the request will be reprocessed in accordance 
with that appeal decision.

0
5. Revise Sec.  1820.10, add Sec. Sec.  1820.11 and 1820.12, and 
designate them under subpart A to read as follows:

Subpart A--Touhy Regulations General Provisions

Sec.
1820.10 Scope and purpose.
1820.11 Applicability.
1820.12 Definitions.


Sec.  1820.10  Scope and purpose.

    (a) This part establishes policy, assigns responsibilities and 
prescribes procedures with respect to:
    (1) The production or disclosure of official information or records 
by current and former OSC employees, and contractors; and
    (2) The testimony of current and former OSC employees, advisors, 
and consultants relating to official information, official duties, or 
the OSC's records, in connection with federal or state litigation or 
administrative proceedings in which the OSC is not a party.
    (b) The OSC intends this part to:
    (1) Conserve the time of OSC employees for conducting official 
business;
    (2) Minimize the involvement of OSC employees in issues unrelated 
to OSC's mission;
    (3) Maintain the impartiality of OSC employees in disputes between 
private litigants; and
    (4) Protect sensitive, confidential information and the 
deliberative processes of the OSC.
    (c) In providing for these requirements, the OSC does not waive the 
sovereign immunity of the United States.
    (d) This part provides guidance for the internal operations of OSC. 
It does

[[Page 27052]]

not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, that a 
party may rely upon in any legal proceeding against the United States.


Sec.  1820.11  Applicability.

    This part applies to demands and requests to current and former 
employees, and contractors, for factual or expert testimony relating to 
official information or official duties or for production of official 
records or information, in legal proceedings in which the OSC is not a 
named party. This part does not apply to:
    (a) Demands upon or requests for current or former OSC employees or 
contractors to testify as to facts or events that are unrelated to his 
or her official duties or that are unrelated to the functions of the 
OSC;
    (b) Requests for the release of records under the Freedom of 
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a; or
    (c) Congressional demands and requests for testimony, records or 
information.


Sec.  1820.12  Definitions.

    The following definitions apply to this part.
    (a) Demand means an order, subpoena, or other command of a court or 
other competent authority for the production, disclosure, or release of 
records or for the appearance and testimony of an OSC employee in a 
legal proceeding.
    (b) General Counsel means the General Counsel of the OSC or a 
person to whom the General Counsel has delegated authority under this 
part.
    (c) Legal proceeding means any matter before a court of law, 
administrative board or tribunal, commission, administrative law judge, 
hearing officer or other body that conducts a legal or administrative 
proceeding. Legal proceeding includes all phases of litigation.
    (d) OSC means the U.S. Office of Special Counsel.
    (e) OSC employee or employee means:
    (1)(i) Any current or former employee of the OSC; and
    (ii) Any other individual hired through contractual agreement by or 
on behalf of the OSC or who has performed or is performing services 
under such an agreement for the OSC.
    (2) This definition does not include persons who are no longer 
employed by the OSC and who agree to testify about matters available to 
the public.
    (f) Records or official records and information means all 
information in the custody and control of the OSC, relating to 
information in the custody and control of the OSC, or acquired by an 
OSC employee in the performance of his or her official duties or 
because of his or her official status, while the individual was 
employee by or on behalf of the OSC.
    (g) Request means any informal request, by whatever method, for the 
production of records and information or for testimony which has not 
been ordered by a court of other competent authority.
    (h) Testimony means any written or oral statements, including 
depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations, 
interviews, and statements made by an individual in connection with a 
legal proceeding.

0
6. Add subpart B to read as follows:

Subpart B--Demands or Requests for Testimony and Production of 
Documents

Sec.
1820.13 General prohibition.
1820.14 Factors the OSC will consider.
1820.15 Filing requirements for litigants.
1820.16 Service of requests or demands.
1820.17 Processing requests or demands.
1820.18 Final determinations.
1820.19 Restrictions that apply to testimony.
1820.20 Restrictions that apply to released records.
1820.21 Procedure when a decision is not made prior to the time a 
response is required.
1820.22 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

Subpart B--Demands or Requests for Testimony and Production of 
Documents


Sec.  1820.13  General prohibition.

    No employee of OSC may produce official records and information or 
provide any testimony relating to official information in response to a 
demand or request without the prior written approval of the General 
Counsel.


Sec.  1820.14  Factors the OSC will consider.

    The General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, may grant an 
employee permission to testify on matters relating to official 
information, or produce official records and information, in response 
to a demand or request. Among the relevant factors that the General 
Counsel may consider in making this decision are whether:
    (a) The purposes of this part are met;
    (b) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be 
necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice;
    (c) Allowing such testimony or production of records would assist 
or hinder the OSC in performing its statutory duties;
    (d) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be in 
the best interest of the OSC or the United States;
    (e) The records or testimony can be obtained from other sources;
    (f) The demand or request is unduly burdensome or otherwise 
inappropriate under the applicable rules of discovery or the rule of 
procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand or request 
arose;
    (g) Disclosure would violate a statute, Executive Order or 
regulation;
    (h) Disclosure would reveal confidential, sensitive, or privileged 
information, trade secrets or similar, confidential or financial 
information, otherwise protected information, or information which 
would otherwise be inappropriate for release;
    (i) Disclosure would impede or interfere with an ongoing law 
enforcement investigation or proceeding, or compromise constitutional 
rights or national security interests;
    (j) Disclosure would result in the OSC appearing to favor one 
litigant over another;
    (k) A substantial government interest is implicated;
    (l) The demand or request is within the authority of the party 
making it; and
    (m) The demand or request is sufficiently specific to be answered.


Sec.  1820.15  Filing requirements for litigants seeking documents or 
testimony.

    A litigant must comply with the following requirements when filing 
a request for official records and information or testimony under this 
part. A request should be filed before a demand is issued.
    (a) The request must be in writing and must be submitted to the 
General Counsel.
    (b) The written request must contain the following information:
    (1) The caption of the legal or administrative proceeding, docket 
number, and name and address of the court or other administrative or 
regulatory authority involved;
    (2) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth 
the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary 
to show relevance;
    (3) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description 
of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal or 
administrative proceeding, and a specific description of the substance 
of the testimony or records sought;
    (4) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs 
any need to

[[Page 27053]]

maintain the confidentiality of the information and outweighs the 
burden on the OSC to produce the records or provide testimony;
    (5) A statement indicating that the information sought is not 
available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from 
the testimony of someone other than an OSC employee, such as a retained 
expert;
    (6) If testimony is requested, the intended use of the testimony, 
and a showing that no document could be provided and used in lieu of 
testimony;
    (7) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending 
motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested 
records or testimony;
    (8) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each 
party in the case; and
    (9) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other 
parties will require of each OSC employee for time spent by the 
employee to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the 
legal proceeding.
    (c) The OSC reserves the right to require additional information to 
complete the request where appropriate.
    (d) The request should be submitted at least 30 days before the 
date that records or testimony is required. Requests submitted in less 
than 30 days before records or testimony is required must be 
accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late 
request and the reasons for expedited processing.
    (e) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the General 
Counsel to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a 
determination not to comply with the request.
    (f) The request should state that the requester will provide a copy 
of the OSC employee's statement free of charge and that the requester 
will permit the OSC to have a representative present during the 
employee's testimony.


Sec.  1820.16  Service of requests or demands.

    Requests or demands for official records or information or 
testimony under this subpart must be served by mail or hand delivery to 
the Office of General Counsel, U.S. Office of Special Counsel, 1730 M. 
St, NW., Suite 213, Washington, DC 20036; or sent by fax to 202-254-
3711.


Sec.  1820.17  Processing requests or demands.

    (a) After receiving service of a request or demand for testimony, 
the General Counsel will review the request and, in accordance with the 
provisions of this subpart, determine whether, or under what 
conditions, to authorize the employee to testify on matters relating to 
official information and/or produce official records and information.
    (b) Absent exigent circumstances, the OSC will issue a 
determination within 30 days from the date the request is received.
    (c) The General Counsel may grant a waiver of any procedure 
described by this subpart where a waiver is considered necessary to 
promote a significant interest of the OSC or the United States, or for 
other good cause.
    (d) Certification (authentication) of copies of records. The OSC 
may certify that records are true copies in order to facilitate their 
use as evidence. If a requester seeks certification, the requester must 
request certified copies from the OSC at least 30 days before the date 
they will be needed.


Sec.  1820.18  Final determination.

    The General Counsel makes the final determination regarding 
requests to employees for production of official records and 
information or testimony in litigation in which the OSC is not a party. 
All final determinations are within the sole discretion of the General 
Counsel. The General Counsel will notify the requester and, when 
appropriate, the court or other competent authority of the final 
determination, the reasons for the grant or denial of the request, and 
any conditions that the General Counsel may impose on the release of 
records or information, or on the testimony of an OSC employee. The 
General Counsel's decision exhausts administrative remedies for 
purposes of disclosure of the information.


Sec.  1820.19  Restrictions that apply to testimony.

    (a) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on 
the testimony of OSC employees including, for example:
    (1) Limiting the areas of testimony;
    (2) Requiring the requester and other parties to the legal 
proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be kept 
under seal;
    (3) Requiring that the transcript will be used or made available 
only in the particular legal proceeding for which testimony was 
requested. The General Counsel may also require a copy of the 
transcript of testimony at the requester's expense.
    (b) The OSC may offer the employee's written declaration in lieu of 
testimony.
    (c) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may 
testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge, but, unless 
specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, the employee 
shall not;
    (1) Disclose confidential or privileged information; or
    (2) For a current OSC employee, testify as an expert or opinion 
witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's 
official duties or the functions of the OSC unless testimony is being 
given on behalf of the United States (see also 5 CFR 2635.805).
    (d) The scheduling of an employee's testimony, including the amount 
of time that the employee will be made available for testimony, will be 
subject to the OSC's approval.


Sec.  1820.20  Restrictions that apply to released records.

    (a) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on 
the release of official records and information, including the 
requirement that parties to the proceeding obtain a protective order or 
execute a confidentiality agreement to limit access and any further 
disclosure. The terms of the protective order or of a confidentiality 
agreement must be acceptable to the General Counsel. In cases where 
protective orders or confidentiality agreements have already been 
executed, the OSC may condition the release of official records and 
information on an amendment to the existing protective order (subject 
to court approval) or confidentiality agreement.
    (b) If the General Counsel so determines, original OSC records may 
be presented for examination in response to a request, but they may not 
be presented as evidence or otherwise used in a manner by which they 
could lose their identity as official OSC records, nor may they be 
marked or altered. In lieu of the original records, certified copies 
may be presented for evidentiary purposes.


Sec.  1820.21  Procedure when a decision is not made prior to the time 
a response is required.

    If a response to a demand or request is required before the General 
Counsel can make the determination referred to in Sec.  1820.28, the 
General Counsel, when necessary, will provide the court or other 
competent authority with a copy of this part, inform the court or other 
competent authority that the request is being reviewed, provide an 
estimate as to when a decision will be made, and seek a stay of the 
demand or request pending a final determination.


Sec.  1820.22  Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

    If the court or other competent authority fails to stay a demand or 
request, the employee upon whom the demand or request is made, unless 
otherwise advised by the General

[[Page 27054]]

Counsel, will appear, if necessary, at the stated time and place, 
produce a copy of this part, state that the employee has been advised 
by counsel not to provide the requested testimony or produce documents, 
and respectfully decline to comply with the demand or request, citing 
United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951).

0
7. Add subpart C, consisting of Sec.  1820.23, to read as follows:

Subpart C--Schedule of Fees


Sec.  1820.23  Fees.

    (a) Generally. The General Counsel may condition the production of 
records or appearance for testimony upon advance payment of a 
reasonable estimate of the costs to the OSC.
    (b) Fees for records. Fees for producing records will include fees 
for searching, reviewing, and duplicating records, costs of attorney 
time spent in reviewing the request, and expenses generated by 
materials and equipment used to search for, produce, and copy the 
responsive information. Costs for employee time will be calculated on 
the basis of the hourly pay of the employee (including all pay, 
allowances, and benefits). Fees for duplication will be the same as 
those charged by the OSC in its Freedom of Information Act regulations 
at Sec.  1820.7.
    (c) Witness fees. Fees for attendance by a witness will include 
fees, expenses, and allowances prescribed by the court's rules. If no 
such fees are prescribed, witness fees will be determined based upon 
the rule of the federal district closest to the location where the 
witness will appear and on 28 U.S.C. 1821, as applicable. Such fees 
will include cost of time spent by the witness to prepare for 
testimony, in travel and for attendance in the legal proceeding, plus 
travel costs.
    (d) Payment of fees. A requester must pay witness fees for current 
OSC employees and any record certification fees by submitting to the 
General Counsel a check or money order for the appropriate amount made 
payable to the United States Department of Treasury. In the case of 
testimony of former OSC employees, the requester must pay applicable 
fees directly to the former OSC employee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 
1821 or other applicable statutes.
    (e) Waiver or reduction of fees. The General Counsel, in his or her 
sole discretion, may, upon a showing of reasonable cause, waive or 
reduce any fees in connection with the testimony, production, or 
certification of records.
    (f) De minimis fees. Fees will not be assessed if the total charge 
would be $10.00 or less.
0
8. Add subpart D, consisting of Sec.  1820.24, to read as follows:

Subpart D--Penalties


Sec.  1820.24  Penalties.

    (a) An employee who discloses official records or information or 
gives testimony relating to official information, except as expressly 
authorized by the OSC, or as ordered by a federal court after the OSC 
has had the opportunity to be heard, may face the penalties provided in 
18 U.S.C. 641 and other applicable laws. Additionally, former OSC 
employees are subject to the restrictions and penalties of 18 U.S.C. 
207 and 216.
    (b) A current OSC employee who testifies or produces official 
records and information in violation of this part shall be subject to 
disciplinary action.
0
9. Add subpart E, consisting of Sec.  1820.25, to read as follows:

Subpart E--Conformity with Other Laws


Sec.  1820.25  Conformity with other laws.

    This regulation is not intended to conflict with 5 U.S.C. 
2302(b)(13).

    Dated: April 21, 2016.
Lisa V. Terry,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016-09799 Filed 5-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7405-01-P
27049

Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 87

Thursday, May 5, 2016

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER ADDRESSES: You may submit comments request can be processed out of order of
contains notices to the public of the proposed by any of the following methods: receipt and addressed on an expedited
issuance of rules and regulations. The • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// basis. That language provides, in part,
purpose of these notices is to give interested www.regulations.gov. Follow the expedited treatment of a FOIA request
persons an opportunity to participate in the instructions for submitting comments. when the requested records relate to ‘‘an
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
• Email: abeckett@osc.gov. Include appeal that is pending before, or that the
rules.
‘‘FOIA/Touhy Regulation’’ in the subject requester faces an imminent deadline
line of the message. for filing with’’ another administrative
OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL • Fax: (202) 254–3711. or judicial tribunal, ‘‘seeking personal
• Mail: U.S. Office of Special relief pursuant to a complaint filed by
5 CFR Part 1820 Counsel, Office of General Counsel, the requester with OSC, or referred to
1730 M Street NW., Suite 218, OSC pursuant to title 38 of the U.S.
Revision of Regulations Governing Washington, DC 20036. Code.’’
Freedom of Information Act Requests • Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. Office The proposed rule would clarify that
and Appeals, and Revision of Touhy of Special Counsel, Office of General the criteria discussed at 5 CFR
Regulations Governing Release of Counsel, 1730 M Street NW., Suite 218, 1820.4(c)(1)(iii) applies only when the
Information in Response to Legal Washington, DC 20036. requested records relate to an appeal for
Proceedings FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: which the requester faces an imminent
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Special Counsel. Amy Beckett, Senior Litigation Counsel, deadline for filing with another
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. U.S. Office of Special Counsel, by administrative or judicial tribunal. In
telephone at (202) 254–3600, by addition, the proposed rule would
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Special facsimile at (202) 254–3711, or by email specify that a grant of expedited
Counsel (OSC) seeks public comment on at abeckett@osc.gov. treatment would apply only to the
a proposed rule that would update and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: following requested records: Letters sent
clarify the procedures for submitting to a complainant by OSC; and the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) I. Background
official complaint form submitted to
requests and appeals, and would modify FOIA Regulations. The U.S. Office of OSC by the complainant or the original
the manner in which FOIA requests Special Counsel (OSC) proposes to referred complaint if referred to OSC
qualify for expedited processing at OSC. revise its FOIA regulations to account pursuant to title 38 of the U.S. Code. All
The proposed rule would describe for the additional electronic methods by other requested records would be
additional methods for submitting FOIA which requesters may submit FOIA processed according to the order in
requests and appeals. It would also requests and appeals, and to modify the which OSC received the request.
promote efficiency in FOIA manner by which requests qualify for By narrowing the focus of expedited
administration by enhancing OSC’s expedited processing. OSC also status to certain records that are of
ability to respond to certain requests on proposes to make minor technical interest to complainant-requesters, and
an expedited basis. The proposed rule revisions to the name of an OSC unit are typically readily available for
makes minor technical revisions to the and to OSC’s Internet and physical disclosure to the complainant-
name of an OSC unit and to OSC’s address information. requesters, OSC will be able to more
Internet and physical address The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.2
efficiently process and respond to
information. and 1820.6 describes regular mail and
OSC also seeks public comment on a expedited requests. Any other requested
fax as the methods by which to submit
proposed rule that would establish records would generally be processed in
FOIA requests and appeals. The
procedures that requesters must follow the order OSC received the request.
proposed rule would add email or other
when making demands on or requests to electronic submission methods. Touhy Regulations. OSC also
an OSC employee to produce official The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.1 proposes to revise its regulations
records or provide testimony relating to refers to the main OSC Internet and relating to the release of information in
official information in connection with FOIA page addresses. The proposed rule response to requests made in connection
a legal proceeding in which the OSC is would describe Internet access to OSC with legal proceedings, such as
not a party. The proposed rule would FOIA resources through the main OSC summonses, complaints, subpoenas,
also establish procedures to respond to Internet address. The existing language and other litigation-related requests or
such demands and requests in an of 5 CFR 1820.2 and 1820.6 regarding demands for OSC’s records or official
orderly and consistent manner. The OSC’s physical address would be information. These regulations are often
proposed rule will promote uniformity modified in a minor, technical manner. referred to as Touhy regulations.
in decisions, protect confidential The existing language of 5 CFR 1820.6 Federal agencies often receive
information, provide guidance to refers to an OSC unit as the ‘‘Legal demands consisting of informal requests
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

requesters, and reduce the potential for Counsel and Policy Division.’’ The for production of records, information,
both inappropriate disclosures of name of that unit would be updated in or testimony in judicial, legislative, or
official information and wasteful the proposed rule to the ‘‘Office of administrative proceedings in which the
allocation of agency resources. General Counsel.’’ agency is not a named party. OSC has
DATES: Written or electronic comments The existing language of 5 CFR identified a need to revise its regulation
must be received on or before July 5, 1820.4(c)(1)(iii) discusses one of the to improve its evaluation and processing
2016. three criteria under which a FOIA of such requests.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:43 May 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05MYP1.SGM 05MYP1
27050 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Proposed Rules

The United States Supreme Court apply, even though this proposed rule is of Special Counsel (OSC) in processing
upheld this type of regulation in United being offered for notice and comment requests for records under the Freedom
States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. procedures under the APA. This of Information Act (FOIA), as amended,
462 (1951), holding that provisions in proposed rule will not directly regulate at 5 U.S.C. 552. These rules and
the federal ‘‘housekeeping’’ statute small entities. OSC therefore need not procedures should be read together with
authorize agencies to promulgate rules perform a regulatory flexibility analysis the FOIA, which provides additional
governing record production and of small entity impacts. information about access to agency
employee testimony. See 5 U.S.C. 301. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act records. Further information about the
The existing language of 5 CFR (UMRA): This proposed revision does FOIA and access to OSC records is
1820.10 refers to the ‘‘[p]roduction of not impose any federal mandates on available on the FOIA page of OSC’s
official records or testimony in legal state, local, or tribal governments, or on Web site (https://www.osc.gov).
proceedings.’’ This revision provides the private sector within the meaning of Information routinely provided to the
the agency with more clearly delineated the UMRA. public as part of a regular OSC
standards for releasing information or National Environmental Policy Act activity—for example, forms, press
witness testimony. Generally, this (NEPA): This proposed rule will have releases issued by the public affairs
revision re-establishes that no OSC no physical impact upon the officer, records published on the
employee or former employee shall environment and therefore will not agency’s Web site, or public lists
release official information or records require any further review under NEPA. maintained at OSC headquarter offices
without the prior approval of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA): This pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1219—may be
Special Counsel or the Special proposed rule does not impose any new requested and provided to the public
Counsel’s duly authorized designee. recordkeeping, reporting, or other without following this part. This part
Under this proposed rule, OSC information collection requirements on also addresses responses to demands by
establishes procedural requirements for the public. The proposed rule sets forth a court or other authority to an
the form and content of requests for procedures by which litigants may serve employee for production of official
official OSC information made through summonses, complaints, subpoenas, records or testimony in legal
a litigation request or demand, as well and other legal process, demands, and proceedings.
as establishing procedures for requests upon the OSC. The proposed
responding to the requests. This rule imposes special procedural § 1820.2 Requirements for making FOIA
proposed rule also states the factors that requirements for those who seek to requests.
OSC will consider in determining serve third-party subpoenas upon the (a) Submission of requests. (1) A
whether to authorize a release of official OSC in accordance with United States request for OSC records under the FOIA
information in response to a request. ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 must be made in writing. The request
Procedural Determinations (1951). These requirements may must be sent by:
increase the time and burden associated (i) Regular mail addressed to: FOIA
Administrative Procedure Act (APA): with obtaining records of the OSC in Officer, U.S. Office of Special Counsel,
This action is taken under the Special response to such third-party subpoenas. 1730 M Street NW., Suite 218,
Counsel’s authority at 5 U.S.C. 1212(e) Executive Order 13132 (Federalism): Washington, DC 20036–4505; or
to publish regulations in the Federal This proposed revision does not have (ii) By fax sent to the FOIA Officer at
Register. new federalism implications under
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory the number provided on the FOIA page
Executive Order 13132. of OSC’s Web site (https://www.osc.gov);
Planning and Review): OSC does not Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
anticipate that this proposed rule will or
Reform): This proposed rule meets (iii) By email or other electronic
have significant economic impact, raise applicable standards of 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
novel issues, and/or have any other means as described on the FOIA page of
of Executive Order 12988. OSC’s Web site.
significant impacts. Thus this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1820 (2) For the quickest handling, both the
under 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and Administrative practice and request letter and envelope or any fax
does not require an assessment of procedure, Freedom of information, cover sheet or email subject line should
potential costs and benefits under Government employees, Touhy be clearly marked ‘‘FOIA Request.’’
6(a)(3) of the Order. regulations. Whether sent by mail, fax, email, or
Congressional Review Act (CRA): OSC For the reasons stated in the other prescribed electronic method, a
has determined that this proposed rule preamble, OSC proposes to revise 5 CFR FOIA request will not be considered to
is not a major rule under the part 1820 as follows: have been received by OSC until it
Congressional Review Act, as it is reaches the FOIA office.
unlikely to result in an annual effect on PART 1820—FREEDOM OF (b) Description of records sought.
the economy of $100 million or more; is INFORMATION ACT REQUESTS; Requesters must describe the records
unlikely to result in a major increase in PRODUCTION OF RECORDS OR sought in enough detail for them to be
costs or prices for consumers, TESTIMONY located with a reasonable amount of
individual industries, federal, state, or effort. When requesting records about an
local government agencies or geographic ■ 1. The authority citation for 5 CFR OSC case file, the case file number,
regions; and is unlikely to have a part 1820 is revised to read as follows: name, and type (for example, prohibited
personnel practice, Hatch Act, USERRA
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

significant adverse effect on Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552 and 1212(e);
competition, employment, investment, Executive Order No. 12600, 52 FR 23781. or other complaint; Hatch Act advisory
productivity, or innovation, or on the ■ 2. Revise §§ 1820.1 and 1820.2 to read opinion; or whistleblower disclosure)
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to as follows: should be provided, if known.
compete in domestic and export Whenever possible, requests should
markets. § 1820.1 General provisions. describe any particular record sought,
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA): The This part contains rules and such as the date, title or name, author,
Regulatory Flexibility Act does not procedures followed by the U.S. Office recipient, and subject matter.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:43 May 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05MYP1.SGM 05MYP1
27052 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Proposed Rules

not create any right or benefit, and control of the OSC, or acquired by (d) Allowing such testimony or
substantive or procedural, that a party an OSC employee in the performance of production of records would be in the
may rely upon in any legal proceeding his or her official duties or because of best interest of the OSC or the United
against the United States. his or her official status, while the States;
individual was employee by or on (e) The records or testimony can be
§ 1820.11 Applicability. behalf of the OSC. obtained from other sources;
This part applies to demands and (g) Request means any informal (f) The demand or request is unduly
requests to current and former request, by whatever method, for the burdensome or otherwise inappropriate
employees, and contractors, for factual production of records and information under the applicable rules of discovery
or expert testimony relating to official or for testimony which has not been or the rule of procedure governing the
information or official duties or for ordered by a court of other competent case or matter in which the demand or
production of official records or authority. request arose;
information, in legal proceedings in (h) Testimony means any written or (g) Disclosure would violate a statute,
which the OSC is not a named party. oral statements, including depositions, Executive Order or regulation;
This part does not apply to: answers to interrogatories, affidavits, (h) Disclosure would reveal
(a) Demands upon or requests for declarations, interviews, and statements confidential, sensitive, or privileged
current or former OSC employees or made by an individual in connection information, trade secrets or similar,
contractors to testify as to facts or events with a legal proceeding. confidential or financial information,
that are unrelated to his or her official ■ 6. Add subpart B to read as follows: otherwise protected information, or
duties or that are unrelated to the information which would otherwise be
functions of the OSC; Subpart B—Demands or Requests for inappropriate for release;
(b) Requests for the release of records Testimony and Production of (i) Disclosure would impede or
under the Freedom of Information Act, Documents interfere with an ongoing law
5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act, 5 Sec. enforcement investigation or
U.S.C. 552a; or 1820.13 General prohibition. proceeding, or compromise
(c) Congressional demands and 1820.14 Factors the OSC will consider. constitutional rights or national security
requests for testimony, records or 1820.15 Filing requirements for litigants. interests;
information. 1820.16 Service of requests or demands. (j) Disclosure would result in the OSC
1820.17 Processing requests or demands. appearing to favor one litigant over
§ 1820.12 Definitions. 1820.18 Final determinations. another;
The following definitions apply to 1820.19 Restrictions that apply to
testimony.
(k) A substantial government interest
this part. is implicated;
(a) Demand means an order, 1820.20 Restrictions that apply to released
records. (l) The demand or request is within
subpoena, or other command of a court 1820.21 Procedure when a decision is not the authority of the party making it; and
or other competent authority for the made prior to the time a response is (m) The demand or request is
production, disclosure, or release of required. sufficiently specific to be answered.
records or for the appearance and 1820.22 Procedure in the event of an
testimony of an OSC employee in a legal adverse ruling. § 1820.15 Filing requirements for litigants
proceeding. seeking documents or testimony.
(b) General Counsel means the Subpart B—Demands or Requests for A litigant must comply with the
General Counsel of the OSC or a person Testimony and Production of following requirements when filing a
to whom the General Counsel has Documents request for official records and
delegated authority under this part. § 1820.13 General prohibition. information or testimony under this
(c) Legal proceeding means any matter part. A request should be filed before a
No employee of OSC may produce
before a court of law, administrative official records and information or demand is issued.
board or tribunal, commission, provide any testimony relating to (a) The request must be in writing and
administrative law judge, hearing officer official information in response to a must be submitted to the General
or other body that conducts a legal or demand or request without the prior Counsel.
administrative proceeding. Legal written approval of the General Counsel. (b) The written request must contain
proceeding includes all phases of the following information:
litigation. § 1820.14 Factors the OSC will consider. (1) The caption of the legal or
(d) OSC means the U.S. Office of The General Counsel, in his or her administrative proceeding, docket
Special Counsel. sole discretion, may grant an employee number, and name and address of the
(e) OSC employee or employee means: permission to testify on matters relating court or other administrative or
(1)(i) Any current or former employee to official information, or produce regulatory authority involved;
of the OSC; and official records and information, in (2) A copy of the complaint or
(ii) Any other individual hired response to a demand or request. equivalent document setting forth the
through contractual agreement by or on Among the relevant factors that the assertions in the case and any other
behalf of the OSC or who has performed General Counsel may consider in pleading or document necessary to
or is performing services under such an making this decision are whether: show relevance;
agreement for the OSC. (a) The purposes of this part are met; (3) A list of categories of records
(2) This definition does not include
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

(b) Allowing such testimony or sought, a detailed description of how
persons who are no longer employed by production of records would be the information sought is relevant to the
the OSC and who agree to testify about necessary to prevent a miscarriage of issues in the legal or administrative
matters available to the public. justice; proceeding, and a specific description of
(f) Records or official records and (c) Allowing such testimony or the substance of the testimony or
information means all information in production of records would assist or records sought;
the custody and control of the OSC, hinder the OSC in performing its (4) A statement as to how the need for
relating to information in the custody statutory duties; the information outweighs any need to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:43 May 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05MYP1.SGM 05MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Proposed Rules 27053

maintain the confidentiality of the employee to testify on matters relating (1) Disclose confidential or privileged
information and outweighs the burden to official information and/or produce information; or
on the OSC to produce the records or official records and information. (2) For a current OSC employee,
provide testimony; (b) Absent exigent circumstances, the testify as an expert or opinion witness
(5) A statement indicating that the OSC will issue a determination within with regard to any matter arising out of
information sought is not available from 30 days from the date the request is the employee’s official duties or the
another source, from other persons or received. functions of the OSC unless testimony
entities, or from the testimony of (c) The General Counsel may grant a is being given on behalf of the United
someone other than an OSC employee, waiver of any procedure described by States (see also 5 CFR 2635.805).
such as a retained expert; this subpart where a waiver is (d) The scheduling of an employee’s
(6) If testimony is requested, the considered necessary to promote a testimony, including the amount of time
intended use of the testimony, and a significant interest of the OSC or the that the employee will be made
showing that no document could be United States, or for other good cause. available for testimony, will be subject
provided and used in lieu of testimony; (d) Certification (authentication) of to the OSC’s approval.
(7) A description of all prior copies of records. The OSC may certify
that records are true copies in order to § 1820.20 Restrictions that apply to
decisions, orders, or pending motions in released records.
the case that bear upon the relevance of facilitate their use as evidence. If a
requester seeks certification, the (a) The General Counsel may impose
the requested records or testimony; conditions or restrictions on the release
(8) The name, address, and telephone requester must request certified copies
from the OSC at least 30 days before the of official records and information,
number of counsel to each party in the including the requirement that parties to
case; and date they will be needed.
the proceeding obtain a protective order
(9) An estimate of the amount of time § 1820.18 Final determination. or execute a confidentiality agreement
that the requester and other parties will The General Counsel makes the final to limit access and any further
require of each OSC employee for time determination regarding requests to disclosure. The terms of the protective
spent by the employee to prepare for employees for production of official order or of a confidentiality agreement
testimony, in travel, and for attendance records and information or testimony in must be acceptable to the General
in the legal proceeding. litigation in which the OSC is not a Counsel. In cases where protective
(c) The OSC reserves the right to party. All final determinations are orders or confidentiality agreements
require additional information to within the sole discretion of the General have already been executed, the OSC
complete the request where appropriate. Counsel. The General Counsel will may condition the release of official
(d) The request should be submitted notify the requester and, when records and information on an
at least 30 days before the date that appropriate, the court or other amendment to the existing protective
records or testimony is required. competent authority of the final order (subject to court approval) or
Requests submitted in less than 30 days determination, the reasons for the grant confidentiality agreement.
before records or testimony is required or denial of the request, and any (b) If the General Counsel so
must be accompanied by a written conditions that the General Counsel determines, original OSC records may
explanation stating the reasons for the may impose on the release of records or be presented for examination in
late request and the reasons for information, or on the testimony of an response to a request, but they may not
expedited processing. OSC employee. The General Counsel’s be presented as evidence or otherwise
(e) Failure to cooperate in good faith decision exhausts administrative used in a manner by which they could
to enable the General Counsel to make remedies for purposes of disclosure of lose their identity as official OSC
an informed decision may serve as the the information. records, nor may they be marked or
basis for a determination not to comply altered. In lieu of the original records,
with the request. § 1820.19 Restrictions that apply to
certified copies may be presented for
(f) The request should state that the testimony.
evidentiary purposes.
requester will provide a copy of the OSC (a) The General Counsel may impose
employee’s statement free of charge and conditions or restrictions on the § 1820.21 Procedure when a decision is
that the requester will permit the OSC testimony of OSC employees including, not made prior to the time a response is
to have a representative present during for example: required.
the employee’s testimony. (1) Limiting the areas of testimony; If a response to a demand or request
(2) Requiring the requester and other is required before the General Counsel
§ 1820.16 Service of requests or demands. parties to the legal proceeding to agree can make the determination referred to
Requests or demands for official that the transcript of the testimony will in § 1820.28, the General Counsel, when
records or information or testimony be kept under seal; necessary, will provide the court or
under this subpart must be served by (3) Requiring that the transcript will other competent authority with a copy
mail or hand delivery to the Office of be used or made available only in the of this part, inform the court or other
General Counsel, U.S. Office of Special particular legal proceeding for which competent authority that the request is
Counsel, 1730 M. St, NW., Suite 213, testimony was requested. The General being reviewed, provide an estimate as
Washington, DC 20036; or sent by fax to Counsel may also require a copy of the to when a decision will be made, and
202–254–3711. transcript of testimony at the requester’s seek a stay of the demand or request
expense. pending a final determination.
§ 1820.17 Processing requests or
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

(b) The OSC may offer the employee’s
demands. written declaration in lieu of testimony. § 1820.22 Procedure in the event of an
(a) After receiving service of a request (c) If authorized to testify pursuant to adverse ruling.
or demand for testimony, the General this part, an employee may testify as to If the court or other competent
Counsel will review the request and, in facts within his or her personal authority fails to stay a demand or
accordance with the provisions of this knowledge, but, unless specifically request, the employee upon whom the
subpart, determine whether, or under authorized to do so by the General demand or request is made, unless
what conditions, to authorize the Counsel, the employee shall not; otherwise advised by the General

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:43 May 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05MYP1.SGM 05MYP1
Document Created: 2016-05-05 01:15:56
Document Modified: 2016-05-05 01:15:56
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Written or electronic comments must be received on or before July 5, 2016.
Contact		Amy Beckett, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Office of Special Counsel, by telephone at (202) 254- 3600, by facsimile at (202) 254-3711, or by email at [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 27049
CFR Associated		Administrative Practice and Procedure; Freedom of Information; Government Employees and Touhy Regulations