81 FR 27088 - Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 87 (May 5, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 87 (May 5, 2016)
| Page Range | 27088-27089 | |
| FR Document | 2016-10632 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 27088-27089] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-10632] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is amending its final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers from the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the period August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014, to correct a ministerial error. DATES: Effective Date: May 5, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Davis (Hyosung) or Edythe Artman (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7924 or (202) 482-3931, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 6, 2016, the Department published the final results for the 2013/2014 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers from Korea.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 81 FR 14087 (March 6, 2016) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (Final Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On March 16, 2016, Petitioner, ABB Inc., and one of the respondents, Hyosung Corporation and HICO America, Inc. (collectively, Hyosung), submitted allegations of ministerial errors. The other respondent, Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. and Hyundai Corporation, USA (collectively, Hyundai) and Petitioner filed comments on the allegations on March 21, 2016. Based on our analysis of the allegations, we made changes to the calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin for Hyosung and for the non-individually examined respondents.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ This analysis is set forth in the Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Scot Fullerton, Director, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the subject of ``Ministerial Error Memorandum for the Amended Final Results of the 2013/2014 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea'', dated April 29, 2016 (Ministerial Error Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers (LPTs) having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies consisting of the active part and any other parts attached to, imported with or invoiced with the active parts of LPTs. The ``active part'' of the transformer consists of one or more of the following when attached to or otherwise assembled with one another: the steel core or shell, the windings, electrical insulation between the windings, the mechanical frame for an LPT. The product definition encompasses all such LPTs regardless of name designation, including but not limited to step-up transformers, step- down transformers, autotransformers, interconnection transformers, voltage regulator transformers, rectifier transformers, and power rectifier transformers. The LPTs subject to this order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Ministerial Error Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ``ministerial error'' as an error ``in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.'' Hyosung argues that in the Final Results, the Department did not update certain programming language in the Margin Calculation Program. As a result, Hyosung contends, the programming language did not fully implement the Department's intended changes. We agree with Hyosung and, therefore, have corrected our Margin Calculation Program.\3\ As a result, the weighted-average dumping margin for Hyosung changes from 9.40 percent to 7.89 percent. Furthermore, the rate for the respondents not selected for individual examination, which is based on the weighted, simple-average of the two respondents selected for individual examination, changes from 6.74 percent to 5.98 percent.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Ministerial Error Memorandum at 3. \4\ The rate applied to the non-selected companies (i.e., ILJIN, ILJIN Electric, and LSIS) is a simple average percentage margin calculated based on Hyosung's and Hyundai's dumping margins for the period August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hyosung also claimed that the Department erred in its application of a freight-revenue cap, but we find this claim does not constitute a ministerial error within the meaning of 735(e) of the Act or 19 CFR 351.224(f), because our adjustment is methodological in nature and the adjustment we made was consistent with our stated intention in the Final Results.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Ministerial Error Memorandum at 3-5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, Petitioner argued that the Department made a ministerial error when it determined it was not necessary to cap sales-related revenues of directly-associated expenses in the calculation of Hyundai's final dumping margin. We find that this claim does not constitute a ministerial error within the meaning of 735(e) of the Act or 19 CFR 351.224(f), as our decision is methodological in nature and our intent to not impose any such caps is reflected in our final margin calculations.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Id. at 6-7. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amended Final Results of the Review The Department determines that the following amended weighted- average dumping margins exist for the period August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Company dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyosung Corporation......................................... 7.89 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd........................... 4.07 ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd..................................... 5.98 ILJIN....................................................... 5.98 LSIS Co., Ltd............................................... 5.98 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We will disclose the calculation memorandum used in our analysis to parties to this segment of the proceeding within five days of the date of the publication of these amended final results pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b). [[Page 27089]] Duty Assessment The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\7\ For Hyosung, whose sales were individually examined and whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated an ad valorem importer-specific duty assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the amended final results of this administrative review, the Department will not issue instructions to CBP to assess antidumping duties on entries due to the preliminary injunction that was issued by the Court of International Trade after the issuance of the Final Results. See CBP Message Number 6098301. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ In these final results, the Department applied the assessment-rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon lifting of the injunction, we will determine if the duty assessment rates covering the period were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For each respondent we will calculate importer (or customer)-specific rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent reported reliable entered values, we will apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importer's/customer's entries during the review period. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Hyosung or Hyundai which they did not know were destined for the United States, we instructed CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- others rate if there was no rate for the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction.\8\ See CBP Message Numbers 6102304 and 6102305 for Hyosung and Hyundai entries, respectively. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Instructions The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of these amended final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the amended final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 22.00 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the period of review. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and, subsequently, the assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these amended final results in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f). Dated: April 29, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-10632 Filed 5-4-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![27088 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Notices
Dated: April 28, 2016. for Hyosung and for the non- agree with Hyosung and, therefore, have
Ronald K. Lorentzen, individually examined respondents.2 corrected our Margin Calculation
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Program.3 As a result, the weighted-
Scope of the Order
and Compliance. average dumping margin for Hyosung
[FR Doc. 2016–10625 Filed 5–4–16; 8:45 am] The scope of this order covers large changes from 9.40 percent to 7.89
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
liquid dielectric power transformers percent. Furthermore, the rate for the
(LPTs) having a top power handling respondents not selected for individual
capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 examination, which is based on the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), weighted, simple-average of the two
whether assembled or unassembled, respondents selected for individual
International Trade Administration complete or incomplete. examination, changes from 6.74 percent
Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies to 5.98 percent.4
[A–580–867] consisting of the active part and any Hyosung also claimed that the
other parts attached to, imported with or Department erred in its application of a
Large Power Transformers From the invoiced with the active parts of LPTs. freight-revenue cap, but we find this
Republic of Korea: Amended Final The ‘‘active part’’ of the transformer claim does not constitute a ministerial
Results of Antidumping Duty consists of one or more of the following error within the meaning of 735(e) of the
Administrative Review; 2013–2014 when attached to or otherwise Act or 19 CFR 351.224(f), because our
assembled with one another: the steel adjustment is methodological in nature
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, core or shell, the windings, electrical and the adjustment we made was
International Trade Administration, insulation between the windings, the consistent with our stated intention in
Department of Commerce. mechanical frame for an LPT. the Final Results.5
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce The product definition encompasses Finally, Petitioner argued that the
(the Department) is amending its final all such LPTs regardless of name Department made a ministerial error
results in the administrative review of designation, including but not limited to when it determined it was not necessary
the antidumping duty order on large step-up transformers, step-down to cap sales-related revenues of directly-
power transformers from the Republic of transformers, autotransformers, associated expenses in the calculation of
Korea (Korea) for the period August 1, interconnection transformers, voltage Hyundai’s final dumping margin. We
2013, through July 31, 2014, to correct regulator transformers, rectifier find that this claim does not constitute
a ministerial error. transformers, and power rectifier a ministerial error within the meaning
DATES: Effective Date: May 5, 2016.
transformers. of 735(e) of the Act or 19 CFR
The LPTs subject to this order are 351.224(f), as our decision is
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: currently classifiable under subheadings methodological in nature and our intent
Brian Davis (Hyosung) or Edythe 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and to not impose any such caps is reflected
Artman (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, 8504.90.9540 of the Harmonized Tariff in our final margin calculations.6
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
International Trade Administration, Although the HTSUS subheadings are Amended Final Results of the Review
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th provided for convenience and customs The Department determines that the
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., purposes, the written description of the following amended weighted-average
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) scope of this order is dispositive. dumping margins exist for the period
482–7924 or (202) 482–3931, August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014:
respectively. Ministerial Error
Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of Weighted-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR average
Background 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as Company dumping
margin
an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or
On March 6, 2016, the Department (percent)
other arithmetic function, clerical error
published the final results for the 2013/
resulting from inaccurate copying, Hyosung Corporation .................. 7.89
2014 administrative review of the
duplication, or the like, and any other Hyundai Heavy Industries Co.,
antidumping duty order on large power
similar type of unintentional error Ltd ........................................... 4.07
transformers from Korea.1 ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd ................ 5.98
which the Secretary considers
On March 16, 2016, Petitioner, ABB ministerial.’’ ILJIN ........................................... 5.98
Inc., and one of the respondents, Hyosung argues that in the Final LSIS Co., Ltd .............................. 5.98
Hyosung Corporation and HICO Results, the Department did not update
America, Inc. (collectively, Hyosung), certain programming language in the Disclosure
submitted allegations of ministerial Margin Calculation Program. As a result, We will disclose the calculation
errors. The other respondent, Hyundai Hyosung contends, the programming memorandum used in our analysis to
Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. and Hyundai language did not fully implement the parties to this segment of the proceeding
Corporation, USA (collectively, Department’s intended changes. We within five days of the date of the
Hyundai) and Petitioner filed comments publication of these amended final
on the allegations on March 21, 2016. 2 This analysis is set forth in the Memorandum to
results pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Based on our analysis of the allegations, Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
we made changes to the calculation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 3 See Ministerial Error Memorandum at 3.
the weighted-average dumping margin from Scot Fullerton, Director, Antidumping and
4 The rate applied to the non-selected companies
Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the
subject of ‘‘Ministerial Error Memorandum for the (i.e., ILJIN, ILJIN Electric, and LSIS) is a simple
1 See Large Power Transformers From the Amended Final Results of the 2013/2014 average percentage margin calculated based on
Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Hyosung’s and Hyundai’s dumping margins for the
Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 81 FR Order on Large Power Transformers from the period August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014.
5 See Ministerial Error Memorandum at 3–5.
14087 (March 6, 2016) and accompanying Issues Republic of Korea’’, dated April 29, 2016
and Decision Memorandum (Final Results). (Ministerial Error Memorandum). 6 Id. at 6–7.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 May 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM 05MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_27175/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Notices 27089
Duty Assessment shipments of subject merchandise and the terms of an APO is a
The Department shall determine and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, sanctionable violation.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection for consumption on or after the
Notification to Interested Parties
(CBP) shall assess antidumping duties publication of these amended final
on all appropriate entries.7 For results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) We are issuing and publishing these
Hyosung, whose sales were individually of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for amended final results in accordance
examined and whose weighted-average respondents noted above will be the rate with section 751(h) of the Act and 19
dumping margin is above de minimis, established in the amended final results CFR 351.224(f).
we calculated an ad valorem importer- of this administrative review; (2) for Dated: April 29, 2016.
specific duty assessment rate based on merchandise exported by manufacturers Paul Piquado,
the ratio of the total amount of dumping or exporters not covered in this Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
calculated for the importer’s examined administrative review but covered in a Compliance.
sales to the total entered value of those prior segment of the proceeding, the [FR Doc. 2016–10632 Filed 5–4–16; 8:45 am]
same sales in accordance with 19 CFR cash deposit rate will continue to be the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the company specific rate published for the
amended final results of this most recently completed segment of this
administrative review, the Department proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
will not issue instructions to CBP to firm covered in this review, a prior
assess antidumping duties on entries review, or the original investigation, but International Trade Administration
due to the preliminary injunction that the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the [A–433–812, A–423–812, A–351–847, A–427–
was issued by the Court of International 828, A–428–844, A–475–834, A–588–875, A–
Trade after the issuance of the Final most recently completed segment of this 580–887, A–570–047, A–791–822, A–583–
Results. See CBP Message Number proceeding for the manufacturer of the 858, A–489–828]
6098301. subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
Upon lifting of the injunction, we will deposit rate for all other manufacturers Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-
determine if the duty assessment rates or exporters will continue to be 22.00 Length Plate From Austria, Belgium,
covering the period were de minimis, in percent, the all-others rate established Brazil, France, the Federal Republic of
accordance with the requirement set in the antidumping investigation.9 Germany, Italy, Japan, the Republic of
forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For each These cash deposit requirements, when Korea, the People’s Republic of China,
respondent we will calculate importer imposed, shall remain in effect until South Africa, Taiwan, and the Republic
(or customer)-specific rates by further notice. of Turkey: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-
aggregating the amount of dumping Notification to Importers Regarding the Value Investigations
calculated for all U.S. sales to that Reimbursement of Duties AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
importer or customer and dividing this
International Trade Administration,
amount by the total entered value of the This notice also serves as a final
Department of Commerce.
sales to that importer (or customer). reminder to importers of their
Where an importer (or customer)- responsibility under 19 CFR DATES: Effective Date: April 28, 2016.
specific ad valorem rate is greater than 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
de minimis, and the respondent regarding the reimbursement of Edythe Artman at (202) 482–3931
reported reliable entered values, we will antidumping duties prior to liquidation (Austria), Elizabeth Eastwood at (202)
apply the assessment rate to the entered of the relevant entries during the period 482–3874 (Belgium and Italy), Mark
value of the importer’s/customer’s of review. Failure to comply with this Kennedy at (202) 482–7883 (Brazil),
entries during the review period. requirement could result in the Brandon Custard at (202) 482–1823
For entries of subject merchandise Department’s presumption that (Federal Republic of Germany
during the POR produced by Hyosung reimbursement of antidumping duties (Germany)), Terre Keaton Stefanova at
or Hyundai which they did not know occurred and, subsequently, the (202) 482–1280 (France), Kabir
were destined for the United States, we assessment of doubled antidumping Archuletta at (202) 482–2593 (Japan),
instructed CBP to liquidate unreviewed duties. Steve Bezirganian at (202) 482–1131
entries at the all-others rate if there was (Republic of Korea (Korea)), Ryan
no rate for the intermediate company or Administrative Protective Order Mullen at (202) 482–5260 (the People’s
companies involved in the This notice also serves as a reminder Republic of China (the PRC)), Julia
transaction.8 See CBP Message Numbers to parties subject to administrative Hancock at (202) 482–1394 (South
6102304 and 6102305 for Hyosung and protective orders (APO) of their Africa), Tyler Weinhold at (202) 482–
Hyundai entries, respectively. responsibility concerning the return or 1121 (Taiwan), or Dmitry Vladimirov at
destruction of proprietary information (202) 482–0665 (Republic of Turkey
Cash Deposit Instructions
disclosed under APO in accordance (Turkey)), AD/CVD Operations,
The following cash deposit Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
requirements will be effective upon Department of Commerce, 14th Street
continues to govern business
publication of this notice for all and Constitution Avenue NW.,
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written Washington, DC 20230.
7 In these final results, the Department applied
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
notification of the return/destruction of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the assessment-rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the APO materials, or conversion to judicial The Petitions
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and protective order, is hereby requested.
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Failure to comply with the regulations On April 8, 2016, the Department of
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 Commerce (the Department) received
(February 14, 2012).
8 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 9 See Large Power Transformers From the antidumping duty (AD) petitions
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR concerning imports of certain carbon
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 53177 (August 31, 2012). and alloy steel cut-to-length plate (CTL
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 May 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM 05MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_27175/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-05-05 01:15:37
Document Modified: 2016-05-05 01:15:37
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brian Davis (Hyosung) or Edythe Artman (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7924 or (202) 482-3931, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 27088 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR