81_FR_27425 81 FR 27337 - Clethodim; Pesticide Tolerances

81 FR 27337 - Clethodim; Pesticide Tolerances

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 88 (May 6, 2016)

Page Range27337-27342
FR Document2016-10738

This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of clethodim in or on multiple commodities which are identified and discussed later in this document. Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 88 (Friday, May 6, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27337-27342]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0035; FRL-9945-68]


Clethodim; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of 
clethodim in or on multiple commodities which are identified and 
discussed later in this document. Interregional Research Project Number 
4 (IR-4) requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective May 6, 2016. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before July 5, 2016, and 
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR 
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0035, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Registration Division 
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone 
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's 
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government 
Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0035 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
July 5, 2016. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and 
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0035, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of Wednesday, May 20, 2015 (80 FR 28925) 
(FRL-9927-39), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 
408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide 
petition (PP 4E8334) by Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), 
500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition 
requested that 40 CFR 180.458 be amended by establishing tolerances for 
residues of the herbicide clethodim, 2-[(1E)-1-[[[(2E)-3-chloro-2-
propenyl]oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-
cyclohexen-1-one, and its metabolites containing the 5-(2-
ethylthiopropyl)cyclohexene-3-one and 5-(2-ethylthiopropyl)-5-
hydroxycyclohexene-3-one moieties and their sulphoxides and sulphones, 
calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of clethodim, in or on 
stevia at 12 parts per million (ppm); pome fruit group 11-10 at 0.2 
ppm; stone fruit group 12-12 at 0.2 ppm; bulb onion subgroup 3-07A at 
0.2 ppm; low growing berry subgroup 13-07G, except cranberry at 3.0 
ppm; rapeseed subgroup 20A, except flax 0.5 ppm;

[[Page 27338]]

sunflower subgroup 20B at 5.0 ppm; cottonseed subgroup 20C at 1.0 ppm; 
and fruiting vegetable group 08-10 at 1.0 ppm. Also, this notice 
further requests amending 40 CFR 180.458 by removing the following 
commodity listings: canola seed at 0.5 ppm, cotton, undelinted seed at 
1.0 ppm, peach at 0.2 ppm, onion, bulb at 0.2 ppm, strawberry at 3.0 
ppm, and sunflower, seed at 5.0 ppm, upon establishment of the 
aforementioned tolerances. That document referenced a summary of the 
petition prepared by Valent USA Corporation, the registrant, which is 
available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. There were no 
comments received in response to the notice of filing.
    Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has made 
some modifications to petitioned-for crop tolerances. The reasons for 
these changes are explained in Unit IV.C.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a 
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a 
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure 
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary 
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable 
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in 
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. 
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . 
.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors 
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available 
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this 
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a 
determination on aggregate exposure for clethodim including exposure 
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's 
assessment of exposures and risks associated with clethodim follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their 
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of 
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered 
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities 
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and 
children.
    The liver is the target organ based on repeated dosing by either 
oral or dermal routes in rats, mice, and dogs. The observed liver 
effects are characterized by increased liver weights, clinical 
chemistry changes, and centrilobular hepatic hypertrophy. Most of the 
liver effects that occurred at or below 100 milligrams/kilogram body 
weight (mg/kg bw) were considered as adaptive effects and not adverse. 
Decreased body weight was also a common finding across studies and 
species. In the 1-year dog oral toxicity study, hematological changes 
such as increased platelet and leukocyte counts were also noted.
    Developmental effects were not present in rabbits; the rat 
developmental toxicity study showed reduced fetal body weights and an 
increase in the incidence of delayed ossification of the lower 
vertebrae at the same dose where maternal toxicity was found. Neither 
reproductive nor offspring effects were seen in the 2-generation rat 
reproduction study. Therefore, the data did not show an increased 
susceptibility in the young. The clethodim database also showed no 
potential for neurotoxicity or immunotoxicity.
    The rat and mouse carcinogenicity studies did not show treatment-
related increases in tumor incidence. Clethodim is not genotoxic and is 
classified as ``not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.''
    Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the 
adverse effects caused by Clethodim as well as the no-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level 
(LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at http://www.regulations.gov in document'', Clethodim. Human Health Aggregate 
Risk Assessment for the Proposed New Uses on Stevia, Pome Fruit Group 
11-10, Stone Fruit Group 12-12, Bulb Onion Subgroup 3-07A, Low Growing 
Berry Subgroup 13-07G, (except Cranberry); Rapeseed Subgroup 20A 
(except Flax Seed), Sunflower Subgroup 20B, Cottonseed Subgroup 20C, 
and Fruiting Vegetable Group 8-10, pages number 29 through 34 in docket 
ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0035.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA 
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of 
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the 
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no 
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for 
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed 
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to 
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) 
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified 
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with 
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a 
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe 
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes 
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the 
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of 
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the 
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete 
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides.
    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for clethodim used for 
human risk assessment is shown in Table 1 of this unit.

[[Page 27339]]



   Table 1--Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Clethodim for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Point of departure
        Exposure/scenario            and uncertainty/     RfD, PAD, LOC for     Study and toxicological effects
                                      safety factors       risk assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute dietary (All populations)..  NOAEL = 100 mg/kg/    Acute RfD = 1 mg/kg/ Acute neurotoxicity studies--rats.
                                    day.                  day.                LOAEL = 1,000 mg/kg based on
                                   UFA = 10x...........  aPAD = 1 mg/kg/day.   clinical observation from two
                                   UFH = 10x...........                        acute neurotoxicity studies (one
                                   FQPA SF = 1x........                        study was conducted in 2006 and
                                                                               another was completed in 2012).
                                                                               The clinical observation included
                                                                               decreased spontaneous activity,
                                                                               ruffled fur, head tilt, and
                                                                               hunched posture.
Chronic dietary (All populations)  NOAEL = 30 mg/kg/day  Chronic RfD = 0.3    Carcinogenicity study--mice.
                                   UFA = 10x...........   mg/kg/day.          LOAEL = 150 mg/kg/day based on
                                   UFH = 10x...........  cPAD = 0.3 mg/kg/     reduced survival; decreased red
                                   FQPA SF = 1x........   day.                 cell mass; and increased
                                                                               incidences of bile duct
                                                                               hyperplasia, of pigmentation of
                                                                               the liver, and of foci of
                                                                               amphophilic macrophages in the
                                                                               lung.
Incidental Oral Short-Term (1-30   NOAEL = 75 mg/kg/day  LOC for MOE = 100..  90-day oral toxicity--dogs.
 days).                            UFA = 10X...........                       LOAEL = 125 mg/kg/day based on
                                   UFH = 10X...........                        increased absolute and relative
                                   FQPA SF = 1X........                        liver weights, and histological
                                                                               changes characterized by
                                                                               cytoplasmic vesiculation and
                                                                               vacuolation of the central
                                                                               lobular hepatocytes in both
                                                                               sexes.
Inhalation Short-Term (1 to 30     NOAEL = 75 mg/kg/day  LOC for MOE = 100..  90-day oral toxicity--dogs
 days).                            UFA = 10X...........                       LOAEL = 125 mg/kg/day based on
                                   UFH = 10X...........                        increased absolute and relative
                                   FQPA SF = 1X........                        liver weights, and histological
                                                                               changes characterized by
                                                                               cytoplasmic vesiculation and
                                                                               vacuolation of the central
                                                                               lobular hepatocytes in both
                                                                               sexes.
                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancer (Oral, dermal, inhalation)      Clethodim is classified as ``Not Likely'' to be carcinogenic based no
                                           treatment-related increase in tumor incidence in rat and mouse
                                                              carcinogenicity studies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FQPA SF = Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level. LOC = level
  of concern. mg/kg/day = milligram/kilogram/day. NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-level. PAD = population
  adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic). RfD = reference dose. UF = uncertainty factor. UFA = extrapolation
  from animal to human (interspecies). UFH = potential variation in sensitivity among members of the human
  population (intraspecies).

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary 
exposure to clethodim, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned-for 
tolerances as well as all existing clethodim tolerances in 40 CFR 
180.458. EPA assessed dietary exposures from clethodim in food as 
follows:
    i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk 
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological 
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring 
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure.
    Such effects were identified for clethodim. In estimating acute 
dietary exposure, EPA used the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model 
software with the Food Commodity Intake Database (DEEM-FCID), Version 
3.16, which incorporates 2003-2008 food consumption data from the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) National Health and Nutrition 
Examination Survey, What We Eat in America, (NHANES/WWEIA). As to 
residue levels in food, EPA conducted unrefined acute dietary analyses 
assuming tolerance-level residues for all commodities and 100 percent 
crop treated (PCT). Unless tolerances were established for processed 
commodities, DEEM version 7.81 default processing factors were assumed.
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure 
assessment EPA used the DEEM-FCID, Version 3.16, which incorporates 
2003-2008 food consumption data from the USDA's NHANES/WWEIA. As to 
residue levels in food, EPA conducted unrefined chronic dietary 
analyses assuming tolerance-level residues for all commodities and 100 
PCT. Unless tolerances were established for processed commodities, DEEM 
version 7.81 default processing factors were assumed.
    iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has 
concluded that clethodim does not pose a cancer risk to humans. 
Therefore, a dietary exposure assessment for the purpose of assessing 
cancer risk was not conducted.
    iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information. 
EPA did not use anticipated residue and/or PCT information in the 
dietary assessment for clethodim. Tolerance-level residues and 100 PCT 
were assumed for all food commodities.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening-
level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk 
assessment for clethodim in drinking water. These simulation models 
take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport 
characteristics of clethodim. Further information regarding EPA 
drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be 
found at: http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/about-water-exposure-models-used-pesticide.
    Based on the First Index Reservoir Screening Tool (FIRST) and 
Pesticide Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM GW) models, the estimated 
drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) of clethodim for acute exposures 
are 330 parts per billion (ppb) for surface water and 1,430 ppb for 
ground water.
    For chronic exposures for non-cancer assessments are estimated to 
be 137 ppb for surface water and 1,150 ppb for ground water.
    Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly 
entered into the dietary exposure model.
    For acute dietary risk assessment, the water concentration value of 
1,430 ppb was used to assess the contribution to drinking water.
    For chronic dietary risk assessment, the water concentration of 
value 1,150 ppb was used to assess the contribution to drinking water.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is 
used in this document to refer to non-

[[Page 27340]]

occupational, non-dietary exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest 
control, indoor pest control, termiticides, and flea and tick control 
on pets).
    Clethodim is currently registered for the following uses that could 
result in residential exposures: In and around ornamental plant beds, 
landscaped area, trees, and ground covers (mulch). There are no 
residential uses associated with proposed new uses. EPA has previously 
assessed clethodim residential exposure using the following 
assumptions: Short-term residential handler inhalation exposures 
represent the ``worst case'' high-end exposure. Because a dermal hazard 
was not identified, residential handler and post-application dermal 
risk assessments were not conducted. No other post-application 
exposures were assessed either because the potential for exposure via 
non-dietary ingestion for young children is unlikely due to the limited 
residential uses for clethodim products. The extent to which young 
children engage in the types of activities associated with these areas 
(i.e., ornamental landscapes) or utilize these areas for prolonged 
periods of play is low. No intermediate-term or chronic exposures are 
expected from the currently registered residential uses.
    Further information regarding EPA standard assumptions and generic 
inputs for residential exposures may be found at: http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/standard-operating-procedures-residential-pesticide.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of 
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when 
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the 
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative 
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances 
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA has not found clethodim to share a common mechanism of toxicity 
with any other substances, and clethodim does not appear to produce a 
toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this 
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that clethodim does not 
have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For 
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a 
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of 
such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at: http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA 
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants 
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal 
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity 
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a 
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This 
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety 
Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default 
value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when 
reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different 
factor.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. There is no evidence of 
increased susceptibility of fetuses as compared to maternal animals 
following in utero and/or postnatal exposure to clethodim in the 
developmental toxicity studies in rats or rabbits, and no increased 
sensitivity in pups as compared to adults in the 2-generation rat 
reproduction toxicity study. There are no residual uncertainties 
concerning prenatal and postnatal toxicity and no neurotoxicity 
concerns.
    3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the 
safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the 
FQPA SF were reduced to 1X. That decision is based on the following 
findings:
    i. The toxicity database for clethodim is complete.
    ii. There is no indication that clethodim is a neurotoxic chemical 
and there is no need for a developmental neurotoxicity study or 
additional UFs to account for neurotoxicity.
    iii. There is no evidence of increased susceptibility of fetuses as 
compared to maternal animals following in utero and/or postnatal 
exposure to clethodim in the developmental toxicity studies in rats or 
rabbits, and no increased sensitivity in pups as compared to adults in 
the 2-generation rat reproduction toxicity study. In the rat 
developmental study, reduced ossification seen at the same dose that 
resulted in maternal toxicity is considered secondary to reduced 
maternal body weight, and is not considered qualitative susceptibility. 
There are no residual uncertainties concerning prenatal and postnatal 
toxicity and no neurotoxicity concerns.
    iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure 
databases. The dietary food exposure assessments were performed based 
on 100 PCT and tolerance-level residues. EPA made conservative 
(protective) assumptions in the ground and surface water modeling used 
to assess exposure to clethodim in drinking water. Post application 
exposure of children and incidental oral exposures to toddlers are 
expected to be negligible. All exposure estimates are based on 
conservative assumptions that will not underestimate the exposure and 
risks posed by clethodim.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide 
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the 
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA 
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the 
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term 
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, 
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an 
adequate MOE exists.
    1. Acute risk. An acute aggregate risk assessment takes into 
account acute exposure estimates from dietary consumption of food and 
drinking water. Acute exposure is not expected for the residential 
exposure pathway. Therefore, the acute aggregate risk would be 
equivalent to the acute dietary exposure estimates.
    Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this unit for acute 
exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water to clethodim 
will occupy 29% of the aPAD for all infants <1 year old, the population 
group receiving the greatest exposure.
    2. Chronic risk. There are no chronic residential exposure 
scenarios. Therefore, the chronic aggregate risk would be equivalent to 
the chronic dietary exposure (food and drinking water) estimate. Using 
the exposure assumptions described in this unit for chronic exposure, 
EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to clethodim from food and 
water will utilize 30% of the cPAD for all infants <1 year old, the 
population group receiving the greatest exposure.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into 
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food 
and water (considered to be a background exposure level). Clethodim is 
currently registered for uses that could result in short-term 
residential exposure, and the Agency has determined that it is 
appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water with 
short-term residential exposures to

[[Page 27341]]

clethodim. Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for 
short-term exposures, EPA has concluded the combined short-term food, 
water, and residential exposures result in the short-term aggregate 
risk estimate for adults ages 20-49 is a MOE of 2,200. Because EPA's 
level of concern for clethodim is a MOE of 100 or below, this MOE is 
not of concern.
    4. Intermediate-term risk. An intermediate-term adverse effect was 
identified; however, clethodim is not registered for any use patterns 
that would result in intermediate-term residential exposure. 
Intermediate-term risk is assessed based on intermediate-term 
residential exposure plus chronic dietary exposure. Because there is no 
intermediate-term residential exposure and chronic dietary exposure has 
already been assessed under the appropriately protective cPAD (which is 
at least as protective as the POD used to assess intermediate-term 
risk), no further assessment of intermediate-term risk is necessary, 
and EPA relies on the chronic dietary risk assessment for evaluating 
intermediate-term risk for clethodim.
    5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Based on the lack of 
evidence of carcinogenicity in two adequate rodent carcinogenicity 
studies, clethodim is not expected to pose a cancer risk to humans.
    6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA 
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate 
exposure to clethodim residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate enforcement methodologies are available: FDA Multiresidue 
Methods, gas chromatography/flame photometric detection in the sulfur 
mode (GC/FPD-S) and gas chromatography method with mass selective 
detection (GC/MSD).
    These methods have been adequately validated for the analyses of 
residues of clethodim in/on crop matrices.
    The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry 
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address: 
[email protected].

B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. 
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent 
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA 
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established 
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA 
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations 
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food 
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety 
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United 
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from 
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain 
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
    The Codex has established MRLs for clethodim in or on onion bulb 
and garlic at 0.5 ppm, tomato at 1 ppm, rapeseed at 0.5 ppm, sunflower 
seed at 0.5 ppm, and cotton seed at 0.5 ppm. The U.S. tolerances for 
rapeseed subgroup 20A, fruiting vegetables crop group 8-10, and onion, 
bulb, subgroup 3-07A are harmonized with the Codex MRLs for rapeseed, 
tomato, and bulb onion and garlic, respectively.
    However, the U.S. tolerances for sunflower subgroup 20B and 
cottonseed subgroup 20C are not harmonized with the corresponding Codex 
MRLs for sunflower seed and cotton seed since the MRL values are lower 
than the U.S tolerances. The U.S. tolerances cannot be lowered to 
harmonize because doing so could result in residues above the 
tolerances when following the U.S. approved label directions.

C. Revisions to Petitioned-for Tolerances

    The Agency made changes to the naming of certain petitioned-for 
commodities to reflect the current commodity definitions and 
significant figures used by the Agency. Although the petitioner 
requested a tolerance on stevia only, EPA established a tolerance on 
stevia, dried leaves because the dried commodity represents stevia that 
will be found in the U.S. trade market. Moreover, the Agency is 
removing certain commodities from the table at Sec.  180.458(a) in 
order to eliminate redundancies upon the establishment of new crop 
group tolerances that were not identified in the petition: mustard, 
seed at 0.5 ppm, safflower, seed at 5.0 ppm, sesame, seed at 0.35 ppm, 
vegetable, fruiting group 8 at 1.0 ppm.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of clethodim, 2-
[(1E)-1-[[[(2E)-3-chloro-2-propenyl]oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-
(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one, and its metabolites 
containing the 5-(2-ethylthiopropyl)cyclohexene-3-one and 5-(2-
ethylthiopropyl)-5-hydroxycyclohexene-3-one moieties and their 
sulphoxides and sulphones, calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent 
of clethodim, in or on berry, low growing, subgroup 13-07G, except 
cranberry at 3.0 ppm; cottonseed subgroup 20C at 1.0 ppm; fruit, pome, 
group 11-10 at 0.20 ppm; fruit, stone, group 12-12 at 0.20 ppm; onion, 
bulb, subgroup 3-07A at 0.50 ppm; rapeseed subgroup 20A, except flax 
seed at 0.50 ppm; stevia, dried leaves at 12 ppm; sunflower subgroup 
20B at 5.0 ppm; and vegetable, fruiting, group 8-10 at 1.0 ppm. EPA is 
also removing the following established tolerances that are superseded 
by this action: Canola seed, at 0.50 ppm; cotton, undelinted seed at 
1.0 ppm; mustard, seed at 0.50 ppm; peach at 0.20 ppm; onion, bulb at 
0.20 ppm; strawberry at 3.0 ppm; safflower, seed at 5.0 ppm; sesame, 
seed at 0.35 ppm; sunflower, seed at 5.0 ppm; vegetable, fruiting group 
8 at 1.0 ppm. Finally, as a housekeeping measure, the Agency is 
removing two individual tolerances that are subsumed within other crop 
group tolerances contained in Sec.  180.458: Bean, dry, seed at 2.5 ppm 
is covered by the entry for vegetable, legume, group 6, except soybean 
at 3.5 ppm and potato at 0.5 ppm is covered by the entry for vegetable, 
tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C at 1.0 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in 
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any 
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal 
Actions to Address

[[Page 27342]]

Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government 
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: April 28, 2016.
Susan Lewis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  180.458, in the table in paragraph (a):
0
a. Remove the entry for ``Bean, dry, seed;''
0
b. Add alphabetically an entry for ``Berry, low growing, subgroup 13-
07G, except cranberry;''
0
c. Remove the entry for ``Canola seed;''
0
d. Add alphabetically an entry for ``Cottonseed subgroup 20C;''
0
e. Remove the entry for ``Cotton, undelinted seed;''
0
f. Add alphabetically entries for ``Fruit, pome, group 11-10'' and 
``Fruit, stone, group 12-12;''
0
g. Remove the entries for ``Mustard, seed'' and ``Onion, bulb;''
0
h. Add alphabetically an entry for ``Onion, bulb, subgroup 3-07A;''
0
i. Remove the entries for ``Peach'' and ``Potato;''
0
j. Add alphabetically an entry for ``Rapeseed subgroup 20A, except flax 
seed;''
0
k. Remove the entries for ``Safflower, seed,'' ``Sesame, seed,'' and 
``Strawberry;''
0
l. Add alphabetically an entry for ``Stevia, dried leaves;''
0
m. Remove the entries for ``Sunflower, seed,'' and ``Vegetable, 
fruiting group 8;'' and
0
n. Add alphabetically the entries for ``Sunflower subgroup 20B'' and 
``Vegetable, fruiting, group 8-10.''
    The additions read as follows:


Sec.  180.458  Clethodim; tolerance for residues.

    (a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Parts  per
                          Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                * * * * *
Berry, low growing, subgroup 13-07G, except cranberry.......         3.0
 
                                * * * * *
Cottonseed subgroup 20C.....................................         1.0
 
                                * * * * *
Fruit, pome, group 11-10....................................        0.20
Fruit, stone, group 12-12...................................        0.20
 
                                * * * * *
Onion, bulb, subgroup 3-07A.................................        0.50
 
                                * * * * *
Rapeseed subgroup 20A, except flax seed.....................        0.50
 
                                * * * * *
Stevia, dried leaves........................................          12
 
                                * * * * *
Sunflower subgroup 20B......................................         5.0
 
                                * * * * *
Vegetable, fruiting, group 8-10.............................         1.0
 
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-10738 Filed 5-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                        27337

                                             (b) Section 18 emergency exemptions.                    Monday through Friday, excluding legal                hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
                                           Time-limited tolerances are established                   holidays. The telephone number for the                178.25(b).
                                           for residues of the insecticide                           Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,                  In addition to filing an objection or
                                           methoxyfenozide, including its                            and the telephone number for the OPP                  hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
                                           metabolites and degradates in or on the                   Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review               as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
                                           commodities listed in the table below,                    the visitor instructions and additional               submit a copy of the filing (excluding
                                           resulting from use of the pesticide under                 information about the docket available                any Confidential Business Information
                                           a Section 18 emergency exemption                          at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.                        (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
                                           granted by EPA. Compliance with the                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      Information not marked confidential
                                           tolerance levels specified in the                         Susan Lewis, Registration Division                    pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
                                           following table is to be determined by                    (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,                disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
                                           measuring only methoxyfenozide (3-                        Environmental Protection Agency, 1200                 notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
                                           methoxy-2-methylbenzoic acid 2-(3,5-                      Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,                    objection or hearing request, identified
                                           dimethylbenzoyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)                    DC 20460–0001; main telephone                         by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
                                           hydrazide) in or on the commodity.                        number: (703) 305–7090; email address:                2015–0035, by one of the following
                                                                                                     RDFRNotices@epa.gov.                                  methods:
                                               Com-         Parts per            Expiration/                                                                 • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
                                                                                                     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                               modity        million           revocation date                                                             www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
                                                                                                     I. General Information                                instructions for submitting comments.
                                           Rice, bran                4.0   December 31,                                                                    Do not submit electronically any
                                                                             2019.                   A. Does this action apply to me?                      information you consider to be CBI or
                                           Rice,                  0.50     December 31,
                                                                                                        You may be potentially affected by                 other information whose disclosure is
                                             grain.                          2019.
                                                                                                     this action if you are an agricultural                restricted by statute.
                                                                                                     producer, food manufacturer, or                         • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
                                           *      *     *        *         *
                                           [FR Doc. 2016–09969 Filed 5–5–16; 8:45 am]                pesticide manufacturer. The following                 Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
                                                                                                     list of North American Industrial                     DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
                                           BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                                                                     Classification System (NAICS) codes is                NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
                                                                                                     not intended to be exhaustive, but rather               • Hand Delivery: To make special
                                           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                  provides a guide to help readers                      arrangements for hand delivery or
                                           AGENCY                                                    determine whether this document                       delivery of boxed information, please
                                                                                                     applies to them. Potentially affected                 follow the instructions at http://
                                           40 CFR Part 180                                           entities may include:                                 www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
                                                                                                        • Crop production (NAICS code 111).                  Additional instructions on
                                           [EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0035; FRL–9945–68]                          • Animal production (NAICS code                    commenting or visiting the docket,
                                                                                                     112).                                                 along with more information about
                                           Clethodim; Pesticide Tolerances
                                                                                                        • Food manufacturing (NAICS code                   dockets generally, is available at http://
                                           AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                         311).                                                 www.epa.gov/dockets.
                                           Agency (EPA).                                                • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS                   II. Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance
                                           ACTION: Final rule.                                       code 32532).
                                                                                                                                                              In the Federal Register of Wednesday,
                                                                                                     B. How can I get electronic access to                 May 20, 2015 (80 FR 28925) (FRL–9927–
                                           SUMMARY:   This regulation establishes                    other related information?
                                           tolerances for residues of clethodim in                                                                         39), EPA issued a document pursuant to
                                           or on multiple commodities which are                         You may access a frequently updated                FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
                                           identified and discussed later in this                    electronic version of EPA’s tolerance                 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
                                           document. Interregional Research                          regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through                pesticide petition (PP 4E8334) by
                                           Project Number 4 (IR–4) requested these                   the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR                Interregional Research Project Number 4
                                           tolerances under the Federal Food,                        site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-             (IR–4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201
                                           Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).                           idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/                  W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
                                                                                                     40tab_02.tpl.                                         requested that 40 CFR 180.458 be
                                           DATES: This regulation is effective May
                                                                                                                                                           amended by establishing tolerances for
                                           6, 2016. Objections and requests for                      C. How can I file an objection or hearing             residues of the herbicide clethodim, 2-
                                           hearings must be received on or before                    request?                                              [(1E)-1-[[[(2E)-3-chloro-2-
                                           July 5, 2016, and must be filed in                          Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21                      propenyl]oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-
                                           accordance with the instructions                          U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an                   (ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-
                                           provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also                     objection to any aspect of this regulation            cyclohexen-1-one, and its metabolites
                                           Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY                            and may also request a hearing on those               containing the 5-(2-
                                           INFORMATION).
                                                                                                     objections. You must file your objection              ethylthiopropyl)cyclohexene-3-one and
                                           ADDRESSES:   The docket for this action,                  or request a hearing on this regulation               5-(2-ethylthiopropyl)-5-
                                           identified by docket identification (ID)                  in accordance with the instructions                   hydroxycyclohexene-3-one moieties and
                                           number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0035, is                           provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure                their sulphoxides and sulphones,
                                           available at http://www.regulations.gov                   proper receipt by EPA, you must                       calculated as the stoichiometric
                                           or at the Office of Pesticide Programs                    identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–                     equivalent of clethodim, in or on stevia
                                           Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)                     OPP–2015–0035 in the subject line on                  at 12 parts per million (ppm); pome fruit
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                           in the Environmental Protection Agency                    the first page of your submission. All                group 11–10 at 0.2 ppm; stone fruit
                                           Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William                      objections and requests for a hearing                 group 12–12 at 0.2 ppm; bulb onion
                                           Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301                   must be in writing, and must be                       subgroup 3–07A at 0.2 ppm; low
                                           Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC                     received by the Hearing Clerk on or                   growing berry subgroup 13–07G, except
                                           20460–0001. The Public Reading Room                       before July 5, 2016. Addresses for mail               cranberry at 3.0 ppm; rapeseed
                                           is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,                      and hand delivery of objections and                   subgroup 20A, except flax 0.5 ppm;


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014    13:56 May 05, 2016    Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00043   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM   06MYR1


                                           27338                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                           sunflower subgroup 20B at 5.0 ppm;                      and to make a determination on                        toxicity studies can be found at http://
                                           cottonseed subgroup 20C at 1.0 ppm;                     aggregate exposure for clethodim                      www.regulations.gov in document’’,
                                           and fruiting vegetable group 08–10 at                   including exposure resulting from the                 Clethodim. Human Health Aggregate
                                           1.0 ppm. Also, this notice further                      tolerances established by this action.                Risk Assessment for the Proposed New
                                           requests amending 40 CFR 180.458 by                     EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks               Uses on Stevia, Pome Fruit Group 11–
                                           removing the following commodity                        associated with clethodim follows.                    10, Stone Fruit Group 12–12, Bulb
                                           listings: canola seed at 0.5 ppm, cotton,                                                                     Onion Subgroup 3–07A, Low Growing
                                                                                                   A. Toxicological Profile
                                           undelinted seed at 1.0 ppm, peach at 0.2                                                                      Berry Subgroup 13–07G, (except
                                           ppm, onion, bulb at 0.2 ppm, strawberry                    EPA has evaluated the available                    Cranberry); Rapeseed Subgroup 20A
                                           at 3.0 ppm, and sunflower, seed at 5.0                  toxicity data and considered their                    (except Flax Seed), Sunflower Subgroup
                                           ppm, upon establishment of the                          validity, completeness, and reliability as
                                                                                                                                                         20B, Cottonseed Subgroup 20C, and
                                           aforementioned tolerances. That                         well as the relationship of the results of
                                                                                                                                                         Fruiting Vegetable Group 8–10, pages
                                           document referenced a summary of the                    the studies to human risk. EPA has also
                                                                                                                                                         number 29 through 34 in docket ID
                                           petition prepared by Valent USA                         considered available information
                                                                                                                                                         number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0035.
                                           Corporation, the registrant, which is                   concerning the variability of the
                                           available in the docket, http://                        sensitivities of major identifiable                   B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
                                           www.regulations.gov. There were no                      subgroups of consumers, including                     Levels of Concern
                                           comments received in response to the                    infants and children.
                                           notice of filing.                                          The liver is the target organ based on                Once a pesticide’s toxicological
                                              Based upon review of the data                        repeated dosing by either oral or dermal              profile is determined, EPA identifies
                                           supporting the petition, EPA has made                   routes in rats, mice, and dogs. The                   toxicological points of departure (POD)
                                           some modifications to petitioned-for                    observed liver effects are characterized              and levels of concern to use in
                                           crop tolerances. The reasons for these                  by increased liver weights, clinical                  evaluating the risk posed by human
                                           changes are explained in Unit IV.C.                     chemistry changes, and centrilobular                  exposure to the pesticide. For hazards
                                                                                                   hepatic hypertrophy. Most of the liver                that have a threshold below which there
                                           III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and                      effects that occurred at or below 100                 is no appreciable risk, the toxicological
                                           Determination of Safety                                 milligrams/kilogram body weight (mg/                  POD is used as the basis for derivation
                                              Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA                     kg bw) were considered as adaptive                    of reference values for risk assessment.
                                           allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the                effects and not adverse. Decreased body               PODs are developed based on a careful
                                           legal limit for a pesticide chemical                    weight was also a common finding                      analysis of the doses in each
                                           residue in or on a food) only if EPA                    across studies and species. In the 1-year             toxicological study to determine the
                                           determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’              dog oral toxicity study, hematological                dose at which no adverse effects are
                                           Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA                       changes such as increased platelet and                observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest
                                           defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a              leukocyte counts were also noted.                     dose at which adverse effects of concern
                                           reasonable certainty that no harm will                     Developmental effects were not                     are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/
                                           result from aggregate exposure to the                   present in rabbits; the rat developmental             safety factors are used in conjunction
                                           pesticide chemical residue, including                   toxicity study showed reduced fetal                   with the POD to calculate a safe
                                           all anticipated dietary exposures and all               body weights and an increase in the                   exposure level—generally referred to as
                                           other exposures for which there is                      incidence of delayed ossification of the              a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a
                                           reliable information.’’ This includes                   lower vertebrae at the same dose where                reference dose (RfD)—and a safe margin
                                           exposure through drinking water and in                  maternal toxicity was found. Neither                  of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold
                                           residential settings, but does not include              reproductive nor offspring effects were               risks, the Agency assumes that any
                                           occupational exposure. Section                          seen in the 2-generation rat                          amount of exposure will lead to some
                                           408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to                   reproduction study. Therefore, the data               degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
                                           give special consideration to exposure                  did not show an increased susceptibility              estimates risk in terms of the probability
                                           of infants and children to the pesticide                in the young. The clethodim database                  of an occurrence of the adverse effect
                                           chemical residue in establishing a                      also showed no potential for                          expected in a lifetime. For more
                                           tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a               neurotoxicity or immunotoxicity.                      information on the general principles
                                           reasonable certainty that no harm will                     The rat and mouse carcinogenicity
                                                                                                                                                         EPA uses in risk characterization and a
                                           result to infants and children from                     studies did not show treatment-related
                                                                                                                                                         complete description of the risk
                                           aggregate exposure to the pesticide                     increases in tumor incidence. Clethodim
                                                                                                                                                         assessment process, see http://
                                           chemical residue. . . .’’                               is not genotoxic and is classified as ‘‘not
                                              Consistent with FFDCA section                                                                              www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-
                                                                                                   likely to be carcinogenic to humans.’’
                                           408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in                 Specific information on the studies                assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-
                                           FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has                     received and the nature of the adverse                human-health-risk-pesticides.
                                           reviewed the available scientific data                  effects caused by Clethodim as well as                   A summary of the toxicological
                                           and other relevant information in                       the no-observed-adverse-effect-level                  endpoints for clethodim used for human
                                           support of this action. EPA has                         (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-                      risk assessment is shown in Table 1 of
                                           sufficient data to assess the hazards of                adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the                 this unit.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:56 May 05, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00044   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM   06MYR1


                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                            27339

                                               TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF TOXICOLOGICAL DOSES AND ENDPOINTS FOR CLETHODIM FOR USE IN HUMAN HEALTH RISK
                                                                                        ASSESSMENT
                                                                                    Point of departure        RfD, PAD, LOC for
                                                  Exposure/scenario                  and uncertainty/                                                    Study and toxicological effects
                                                                                                               risk assessment
                                                                                      safety factors

                                           Acute dietary (All populations) ..     NOAEL = 100 mg/           Acute RfD = 1 mg/          Acute neurotoxicity studies—rats.
                                                                                   kg/day.                    kg/day.                  LOAEL = 1,000 mg/kg based on clinical observation from two
                                                                                  UFA = 10x                 aPAD = 1 mg/kg/day           acute neurotoxicity studies (one study was conducted in
                                                                                  UFH = 10x                                              2006 and another was completed in 2012). The clinical ob-
                                                                                  FQPA SF = 1x                                           servation included decreased spontaneous activity, ruffled
                                                                                                                                         fur, head tilt, and hunched posture.
                                           Chronic dietary (All populations)      NOAEL = 30 mg/kg/         Chronic RfD = 0.3          Carcinogenicity study—mice.
                                                                                   day.                       mg/kg/day.               LOAEL = 150 mg/kg/day based on reduced survival; decreased
                                                                                  UFA = 10x                 cPAD = 0.3 mg/kg/            red cell mass; and increased incidences of bile duct
                                                                                  UFH = 10x                   day                        hyperplasia, of pigmentation of the liver, and of foci of
                                                                                  FQPA SF = 1x                                           amphophilic macrophages in the lung.
                                           Incidental Oral Short-Term (1–         NOAEL = 75 mg/kg/         LOC for MOE = 100          90-day oral toxicity—dogs.
                                             30 days).                             day.                                                LOAEL = 125 mg/kg/day based on increased absolute and rel-
                                                                                  UFA = 10X                                              ative liver weights, and histological changes characterized by
                                                                                  UFH = 10X                                              cytoplasmic vesiculation and vacuolation of the central lob-
                                                                                  FQPA SF = 1X                                           ular hepatocytes in both sexes.
                                           Inhalation Short-Term (1 to 30         NOAEL = 75 mg/kg/         LOC for MOE = 100          90-day oral toxicity—dogs
                                             days).                                day.                                                LOAEL = 125 mg/kg/day based on increased absolute and rel-
                                                                                  UFA = 10X                                              ative liver weights, and histological changes characterized by
                                                                                  UFH = 10X                                              cytoplasmic vesiculation and vacuolation of the central lob-
                                                                                  FQPA SF = 1X                                           ular hepatocytes in both sexes.

                                           Cancer (Oral, dermal, inhala-            Clethodim is classified as ‘‘Not Likely’’ to be carcinogenic based no treatment-related increase in tumor inci-
                                             tion).                                                                dence in rat and mouse carcinogenicity studies.
                                             FQPA SF = Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level. LOC = level of concern. mg/kg/day =
                                           milligram/kilogram/day. NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-level. PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic). RfD = reference
                                           dose. UF = uncertainty factor. UFA = extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies). UFH = potential variation in sensitivity among members
                                           of the human population (intraspecies).


                                           C. Exposure Assessment                                  DEEM version 7.81 default processing                  simulation models take into account
                                                                                                   factors were assumed.                                 data on the physical, chemical, and fate/
                                              1. Dietary exposure from food and
                                                                                                     ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting                 transport characteristics of clethodim.
                                           feed uses. In evaluating dietary
                                                                                                   the chronic dietary exposure assessment               Further information regarding EPA
                                           exposure to clethodim, EPA considered                   EPA used the DEEM–FCID, Version
                                           exposure under the petitioned-for                                                                             drinking water models used in pesticide
                                                                                                   3.16, which incorporates 2003–2008                    exposure assessment can be found at:
                                           tolerances as well as all existing                      food consumption data from the USDA’s
                                           clethodim tolerances in 40 CFR 180.458.                                                                       http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-
                                                                                                   NHANES/WWEIA. As to residue levels                    and-assessing-pesticide-risks/about-
                                           EPA assessed dietary exposures from                     in food, EPA conducted unrefined
                                           clethodim in food as follows:                                                                                 water-exposure-models-used-pesticide.
                                                                                                   chronic dietary analyses assuming                        Based on the First Index Reservoir
                                              i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute                tolerance-level residues for all                      Screening Tool (FIRST) and Pesticide
                                           dietary exposure and risk assessments                   commodities and 100 PCT. Unless                       Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM
                                           are performed for a food-use pesticide,                 tolerances were established for                       GW) models, the estimated drinking
                                           if a toxicological study has indicated the              processed commodities, DEEM version                   water concentrations (EDWCs) of
                                           possibility of an effect of concern                     7.81 default processing factors were                  clethodim for acute exposures are 330
                                           occurring as a result of a 1-day or single              assumed.                                              parts per billion (ppb) for surface water
                                           exposure.                                                 iii. Cancer. Based on the data                      and 1,430 ppb for ground water.
                                              Such effects were identified for                     summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has                       For chronic exposures for non-cancer
                                           clethodim. In estimating acute dietary                  concluded that clethodim does not pose                assessments are estimated to be 137 ppb
                                           exposure, EPA used the Dietary                          a cancer risk to humans. Therefore, a                 for surface water and 1,150 ppb for
                                           Exposure Evaluation Model software                      dietary exposure assessment for the                   ground water.
                                           with the Food Commodity Intake                          purpose of assessing cancer risk was not                 Modeled estimates of drinking water
                                           Database (DEEM–FCID), Version 3.16,                     conducted.                                            concentrations were directly entered
                                           which incorporates 2003–2008 food                         iv. Anticipated residue and percent                 into the dietary exposure model.
                                           consumption data from the U.S.                          crop treated (PCT) information. EPA did                  For acute dietary risk assessment, the
                                           Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s)                    not use anticipated residue and/or PCT                water concentration value of 1,430 ppb
                                           National Health and Nutrition                           information in the dietary assessment                 was used to assess the contribution to
                                           Examination Survey, What We Eat in                      for clethodim. Tolerance-level residues               drinking water.
                                           America, (NHANES/WWEIA). As to                          and 100 PCT were assumed for all food                    For chronic dietary risk assessment,
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                           residue levels in food, EPA conducted                   commodities.                                          the water concentration of value 1,150
                                           unrefined acute dietary analyses                          2. Dietary exposure from drinking                   ppb was used to assess the contribution
                                           assuming tolerance-level residues for all               water. The Agency used screening-level                to drinking water.
                                           commodities and 100 percent crop                        water exposure models in the dietary                     3. From non-dietary exposure. The
                                           treated (PCT). Unless tolerances were                   exposure analysis and risk assessment                 term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
                                           established for processed commodities,                  for clethodim in drinking water. These                this document to refer to non-


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:00 May 05, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00045   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM   06MYR1


                                           27340                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                           occupational, non-dietary exposure                      D. Safety Factor for Infants and                      tolerance-level residues. EPA made
                                           (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control,                Children                                              conservative (protective) assumptions in
                                           indoor pest control, termiticides, and                     1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of             the ground and surface water modeling
                                           flea and tick control on pets).                         FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply                   used to assess exposure to clethodim in
                                              Clethodim is currently registered for                an additional tenfold (10X) margin of                 drinking water. Post application
                                           the following uses that could result in                 safety for infants and children in the                exposure of children and incidental oral
                                           residential exposures: In and around                    case of threshold effects to account for              exposures to toddlers are expected to be
                                           ornamental plant beds, landscaped area,                 prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the               negligible. All exposure estimates are
                                           trees, and ground covers (mulch). There                                                                       based on conservative assumptions that
                                                                                                   completeness of the database on toxicity
                                           are no residential uses associated with                                                                       will not underestimate the exposure and
                                                                                                   and exposure unless EPA determines
                                           proposed new uses. EPA has previously                                                                         risks posed by clethodim.
                                                                                                   based on reliable data that a different
                                           assessed clethodim residential exposure                 margin of safety will be safe for infants             E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
                                           using the following assumptions: Short-                 and children. This additional margin of               Safety
                                           term residential handler inhalation                     safety is commonly referred to as the
                                           exposures represent the ‘‘worst case’’                                                                           EPA determines whether acute and
                                                                                                   FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In applying                  chronic dietary pesticide exposures are
                                           high-end exposure. Because a dermal                     this provision, EPA either retains the
                                           hazard was not identified, residential                                                                        safe by comparing aggregate exposure
                                                                                                   default value of 10X, or uses a different             estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and
                                           handler and post-application dermal                     additional safety factor when reliable
                                           risk assessments were not conducted.                                                                          chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer
                                                                                                   data available to EPA support the choice              risks, EPA calculates the lifetime
                                           No other post-application exposures                     of a different factor.
                                           were assessed either because the                                                                              probability of acquiring cancer given the
                                                                                                      2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity.             estimated aggregate exposure. Short-,
                                           potential for exposure via non-dietary                  There is no evidence of increased
                                           ingestion for young children is unlikely                                                                      intermediate-, and chronic-term risks
                                                                                                   susceptibility of fetuses as compared to              are evaluated by comparing the
                                           due to the limited residential uses for                 maternal animals following in utero                   estimated aggregate food, water, and
                                           clethodim products. The extent to                       and/or postnatal exposure to clethodim                residential exposure to the appropriate
                                           which young children engage in the                      in the developmental toxicity studies in              PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE
                                           types of activities associated with these               rats or rabbits, and no increased                     exists.
                                           areas (i.e., ornamental landscapes) or                  sensitivity in pups as compared to                       1. Acute risk. An acute aggregate risk
                                           utilize these areas for prolonged periods               adults in the 2-generation rat                        assessment takes into account acute
                                           of play is low. No intermediate-term or                 reproduction toxicity study. There are                exposure estimates from dietary
                                           chronic exposures are expected from the                 no residual uncertainties concerning                  consumption of food and drinking
                                           currently registered residential uses.                  prenatal and postnatal toxicity and no                water. Acute exposure is not expected
                                              Further information regarding EPA                    neurotoxicity concerns.                               for the residential exposure pathway.
                                           standard assumptions and generic                           3. Conclusion. EPA has determined                  Therefore, the acute aggregate risk
                                           inputs for residential exposures may be                 that reliable data show the safety of                 would be equivalent to the acute dietary
                                           found at: http://www2.epa.gov/                          infants and children would be                         exposure estimates.
                                           pesticide-science-and-assessing-                        adequately protected if the FQPA SF                      Using the exposure assumptions
                                           pesticide-risks/standard-operating-                     were reduced to 1X. That decision is                  discussed in this unit for acute
                                           procedures-residential-pesticide.                       based on the following findings:                      exposure, the acute dietary exposure
                                              4. Cumulative effects from substances                   i. The toxicity database for clethodim             from food and water to clethodim will
                                           with a common mechanism of toxicity.                    is complete.                                          occupy 29% of the aPAD for all infants
                                           Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA                           ii. There is no indication that                    <1 year old, the population group
                                           requires that, when considering whether                 clethodim is a neurotoxic chemical and                receiving the greatest exposure.
                                           to establish, modify, or revoke a                       there is no need for a developmental                     2. Chronic risk. There are no chronic
                                           tolerance, the Agency consider                          neurotoxicity study or additional UFs to              residential exposure scenarios.
                                           ‘‘available information’’ concerning the                account for neurotoxicity.                            Therefore, the chronic aggregate risk
                                           cumulative effects of a particular                         iii. There is no evidence of increased             would be equivalent to the chronic
                                           pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other                        susceptibility of fetuses as compared to              dietary exposure (food and drinking
                                           substances that have a common                           maternal animals following in utero                   water) estimate. Using the exposure
                                           mechanism of toxicity.’’                                and/or postnatal exposure to clethodim                assumptions described in this unit for
                                              EPA has not found clethodim to share                 in the developmental toxicity studies in              chronic exposure, EPA has concluded
                                           a common mechanism of toxicity with                     rats or rabbits, and no increased                     that chronic exposure to clethodim from
                                           any other substances, and clethodim                     sensitivity in pups as compared to                    food and water will utilize 30% of the
                                           does not appear to produce a toxic                      adults in the 2-generation rat                        cPAD for all infants <1 year old, the
                                           metabolite produced by other                            reproduction toxicity study. In the rat               population group receiving the greatest
                                           substances. For the purposes of this                    developmental study, reduced                          exposure.
                                           tolerance action, therefore, EPA has                    ossification seen at the same dose that                  3. Short-term risk. Short-term
                                           assumed that clethodim does not have                    resulted in maternal toxicity is                      aggregate exposure takes into account
                                           a common mechanism of toxicity with                     considered secondary to reduced                       short-term residential exposure plus
                                           other substances. For information                       maternal body weight, and is not                      chronic exposure to food and water
                                           regarding EPA’s efforts to determine                    considered qualitative susceptibility.                (considered to be a background
                                           which chemicals have a common                           There are no residual uncertainties                   exposure level). Clethodim is currently
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                           mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate                   concerning prenatal and postnatal                     registered for uses that could result in
                                           the cumulative effects of such                          toxicity and no neurotoxicity concerns.               short-term residential exposure, and the
                                           chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at: http://                  iv. There are no residual uncertainties            Agency has determined that it is
                                           www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-                     identified in the exposure databases.                 appropriate to aggregate chronic
                                           assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-                   The dietary food exposure assessments                 exposure through food and water with
                                           assessment-risk-pesticides.                             were performed based on 100 PCT and                   short-term residential exposures to


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:56 May 05, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00046   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM   06MYR1


                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                        27341

                                           clethodim. Using the exposure                           possible, consistent with U.S. food                   (ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-
                                           assumptions described in this unit for                  safety standards and agricultural                     cyclohexen-1-one, and its metabolites
                                           short-term exposures, EPA has                           practices. EPA considers the                          containing the 5-(2-
                                           concluded the combined short-term                       international maximum residue limits                  ethylthiopropyl)cyclohexene-3-one and
                                           food, water, and residential exposures                  (MRLs) established by the Codex                       5-(2-ethylthiopropyl)-5-
                                           result in the short-term aggregate risk                 Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as                   hydroxycyclohexene-3-one moieties and
                                           estimate for adults ages 20–49 is a MOE                 required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).                  their sulphoxides and sulphones,
                                           of 2,200. Because EPA’s level of concern                The Codex Alimentarius is a joint                     calculated as the stoichiometric
                                           for clethodim is a MOE of 100 or below,                 United Nations Food and Agriculture                   equivalent of clethodim, in or on berry,
                                           this MOE is not of concern.                             Organization/World Health                             low growing, subgroup 13–07G, except
                                              4. Intermediate-term risk. An                        Organization food standards program,                  cranberry at 3.0 ppm; cottonseed
                                           intermediate-term adverse effect was                    and it is recognized as an international              subgroup 20C at 1.0 ppm; fruit, pome,
                                           identified; however, clethodim is not                   food safety standards-setting                         group 11–10 at 0.20 ppm; fruit, stone,
                                           registered for any use patterns that                    organization in trade agreements to                   group 12–12 at 0.20 ppm; onion, bulb,
                                           would result in intermediate-term                       which the United States is a party. EPA               subgroup 3–07A at 0.50 ppm; rapeseed
                                           residential exposure. Intermediate-term                 may establish a tolerance that is                     subgroup 20A, except flax seed at 0.50
                                           risk is assessed based on intermediate-                 different from a Codex MRL; however,                  ppm; stevia, dried leaves at 12 ppm;
                                           term residential exposure plus chronic                  FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that                 sunflower subgroup 20B at 5.0 ppm; and
                                           dietary exposure. Because there is no                   EPA explain the reasons for departing                 vegetable, fruiting, group 8–10 at 1.0
                                           intermediate-term residential exposure                  from the Codex level.                                 ppm. EPA is also removing the
                                           and chronic dietary exposure has                           The Codex has established MRLs for                 following established tolerances that are
                                           already been assessed under the                         clethodim in or on onion bulb and garlic              superseded by this action: Canola seed,
                                           appropriately protective cPAD (which is                 at 0.5 ppm, tomato at 1 ppm, rapeseed                 at 0.50 ppm; cotton, undelinted seed at
                                           at least as protective as the POD used to               at 0.5 ppm, sunflower seed at 0.5 ppm,                1.0 ppm; mustard, seed at 0.50 ppm;
                                           assess intermediate-term risk), no                      and cotton seed at 0.5 ppm. The U.S.                  peach at 0.20 ppm; onion, bulb at 0.20
                                           further assessment of intermediate-term                 tolerances for rapeseed subgroup 20A,                 ppm; strawberry at 3.0 ppm; safflower,
                                           risk is necessary, and EPA relies on the                fruiting vegetables crop group 8–10, and              seed at 5.0 ppm; sesame, seed at 0.35
                                           chronic dietary risk assessment for                     onion, bulb, subgroup 3–07A are                       ppm; sunflower, seed at 5.0 ppm;
                                           evaluating intermediate-term risk for                   harmonized with the Codex MRLs for                    vegetable, fruiting group 8 at 1.0 ppm.
                                           clethodim.                                              rapeseed, tomato, and bulb onion and                  Finally, as a housekeeping measure, the
                                              5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S.                    garlic, respectively.                                 Agency is removing two individual
                                           population. Based on the lack of                           However, the U.S. tolerances for                   tolerances that are subsumed within
                                           evidence of carcinogenicity in two                      sunflower subgroup 20B and cottonseed                 other crop group tolerances contained in
                                           adequate rodent carcinogenicity studies,                subgroup 20C are not harmonized with                  § 180.458: Bean, dry, seed at 2.5 ppm is
                                           clethodim is not expected to pose a                     the corresponding Codex MRLs for                      covered by the entry for vegetable,
                                           cancer risk to humans.                                  sunflower seed and cotton seed since                  legume, group 6, except soybean at 3.5
                                              6. Determination of safety. Based on                 the MRL values are lower than the U.S                 ppm and potato at 0.5 ppm is covered
                                           these risk assessments, EPA concludes                   tolerances. The U.S. tolerances cannot                by the entry for vegetable, tuberous and
                                           that there is a reasonable certainty that               be lowered to harmonize because doing                 corm, subgroup 1C at 1.0 ppm.
                                           no harm will result to the general                      so could result in residues above the
                                                                                                                                                         VI. Statutory and Executive Order
                                           population, or to infants and children                  tolerances when following the U.S.
                                                                                                                                                         Reviews
                                           from aggregate exposure to clethodim                    approved label directions.
                                                                                                                                                            This action establishes tolerances
                                           residues.                                               C. Revisions to Petitioned-for Tolerances             under FFDCA section 408(d) in
                                           IV. Other Considerations                                   The Agency made changes to the                     response to a petition submitted to the
                                                                                                   naming of certain petitioned-for                      Agency. The Office of Management and
                                           A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology                                                                         Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
                                                                                                   commodities to reflect the current
                                              Adequate enforcement methodologies                   commodity definitions and significant                 of actions from review under Executive
                                           are available: FDA Multiresidue                         figures used by the Agency. Although                  Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
                                           Methods, gas chromatography/flame                       the petitioner requested a tolerance on               Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
                                           photometric detection in the sulfur                     stevia only, EPA established a tolerance              October 4, 1993). Because this action
                                           mode (GC/FPD–S) and gas                                 on stevia, dried leaves because the dried             has been exempted from review under
                                           chromatography method with mass                         commodity represents stevia that will be              Executive Order 12866, this action is
                                           selective detection (GC/MSD).                           found in the U.S. trade market.                       not subject to Executive Order 13211,
                                              These methods have been adequately                   Moreover, the Agency is removing                      entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
                                           validated for the analyses of residues of               certain commodities from the table at                 Regulations That Significantly Affect
                                           clethodim in/on crop matrices.                          § 180.458(a) in order to eliminate                    Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
                                              The method may be requested from:                    redundancies upon the establishment of                FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
                                           Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,                     new crop group tolerances that were not               Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
                                           Environmental Science Center, 701                       identified in the petition: mustard, seed             Children from Environmental Health
                                           Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;                    at 0.5 ppm, safflower, seed at 5.0 ppm,               Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
                                           telephone number: (410) 305–2905;                       sesame, seed at 0.35 ppm, vegetable,                  April 23, 1997). This action does not
                                           email address: residuemethods@                          fruiting group 8 at 1.0 ppm.                          contain any information collections
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                           epa.gov.                                                                                                      subject to OMB approval under the
                                                                                                   V. Conclusion                                         Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
                                           B. International Residue Limits                            Therefore, tolerances are established              U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
                                             In making its tolerance decisions, EPA                for residues of clethodim, 2-[(1E)-1-                 any special considerations under
                                           seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with                 [[[(2E)-3-chloro-2-                                   Executive Order 12898, entitled
                                           international standards whenever                        propenyl]oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-                      ‘‘Federal Actions to Address


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:56 May 05, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00047   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM   06MYR1


                                           27342                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                           Environmental Justice in Minority                         Dated: April 28, 2016.                                                                               Parts
                                           Populations and Low-Income                              Susan Lewis,                                                         Commodity                          per
                                           Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,                 Director, Registration Division, Office of                                                             million
                                           1994).                                                  Pesticide Programs.
                                                                                                                                                            *         *        *        *                     *
                                              Since tolerances and exemptions that                   Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is                      Onion, bulb, subgroup 3–07A ....                     0.50
                                           are established on the basis of a petition              amended as follows:
                                           under FFDCA section 408(d), such as                                                                               *         *              *               *        *
                                           the tolerance in this final rule, do not                PART 180—[AMENDED]                                    Rapeseed subgroup 20A, except
                                           require the issuance of a proposed rule,                                                                        flax seed ..................................       0.50
                                           the requirements of the Regulatory                      ■ 1. The authority citation for part 180
                                           Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et                  continues to read as follows:                            *          *         *               *             *
                                           seq.), do not apply.                                                                                          Stevia, dried leaves ....................                  12
                                                                                                       Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
                                              This action directly regulates growers,              ■  2. In § 180.458, in the table in                     *         *        *            *                   *
                                           food processors, food handlers, and food                paragraph (a):                                        Sunflower subgroup 20B ............                       5.0
                                           retailers, not States or tribes, nor does               ■ a. Remove the entry for ‘‘Bean, dry,
                                           this action alter the relationships or                  seed;’’                                                 *          *          *        *                    *
                                           distribution of power and                               ■ b. Add alphabetically an entry for                  Vegetable, fruiting, group 8–10 ..                        1.0
                                           responsibilities established by Congress                ‘‘Berry, low growing, subgroup 13–07G,
                                           in the preemption provisions of FFDCA                                                                             *            *             *            *         *
                                                                                                   except cranberry;’’
                                           section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency                  ■ c. Remove the entry for ‘‘Canola
                                           has determined that this action will not                                                                      *        *       *        *        *
                                                                                                   seed;’’                                               [FR Doc. 2016–10738 Filed 5–5–16; 8:45 am]
                                           have a substantial direct effect on States              ■ d. Add alphabetically an entry for
                                           or tribal governments, on the                                                                                 BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                                                                   ‘‘Cottonseed subgroup 20C;’’
                                           relationship between the national                       ■ e. Remove the entry for ‘‘Cotton,
                                           government and the States or tribal                     undelinted seed;’’
                                           governments, or on the distribution of                  ■ f. Add alphabetically entries for                   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
                                           power and responsibilities among the                    ‘‘Fruit, pome, group 11–10’’ and ‘‘Fruit,             COMMISSION
                                           various levels of government or between                 stone, group 12–12;’’
                                           the Federal Government and Indian                       ■ g. Remove the entries for ‘‘Mustard,
                                                                                                                                                         47 CFR Part 11
                                           tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined                 seed’’ and ‘‘Onion, bulb;’’                           [ET Docket No. 04–296; FCC 16–32]
                                           that Executive Order 13132, entitled                    ■ h. Add alphabetically an entry for
                                           ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,                 ‘‘Onion, bulb, subgroup 3–07A;’’                      Amendment of the Emergency Alert
                                           1999) and Executive Order 13175,                        ■ i. Remove the entries for ‘‘Peach’’ and             System
                                           entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination                ‘‘Potato;’’
                                           with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR                 ■ j. Add alphabetically an entry for                  AGENCY:  Federal Communications
                                           67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply                   ‘‘Rapeseed subgroup 20A, except flax                  Commission.
                                           to this action. In addition, this action                seed;’’                                               ACTION: Final rule.
                                           does not impose any enforceable duty or                 ■ k. Remove the entries for ‘‘Safflower,
                                           contain any unfunded mandate as                         seed,’’ ‘‘Sesame, seed,’’ and                                In this document, the Federal
                                                                                                                                                         SUMMARY:
                                           described under Title II of the Unfunded                ‘‘Strawberry;’’                                   Communications Commission (FCC or
                                           Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.                    ■ l. Add alphabetically an entry for
                                                                                                                                                     Commission) revises its rules governing
                                           1501 et seq.).                                          ‘‘Stevia, dried leaves;’’                         the Emergency Alert System (EAS) to
                                              This action does not involve any                     ■ m. Remove the entries for ‘‘Sunflower,
                                                                                                                                                     incorporate new multilingual alerting
                                           technical standards that would require                  seed,’’ and ‘‘Vegetable, fruiting group           reporting requirements into its State
                                           Agency consideration of voluntary                       8;’’ and                                          EAS Plan reporting requirements. The
                                           consensus standards pursuant to section                 ■ n. Add alphabetically the entries for
                                                                                                                                                     Commission takes this action in
                                           12(d) of the National Technology                        ‘‘Sunflower subgroup 20B’’ and                    response to a Petition for Immediate
                                           Transfer and Advancement Act                            ‘‘Vegetable, fruiting, group 8–10.’’              Interim Relief (Petition) jointly filed by
                                           (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).                              The additions read as follows:                 the Independent Spanish Broadcasters
                                                                                                                                                     Association (ISBA), the Office of
                                           VII. Congressional Review Act                           § 180.458 Clethodim; tolerance for                Communication of the United Church of
                                             Pursuant to the Congressional Review                  residues.                                         Christ, Inc., and the Minority Media and
                                           Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will                       (a) * * *                                      Telecommunications Council (now
                                           submit a report containing this rule and                                                                  called The Multicultural, Media,
                                           other required information to the U.S.                                                        Parts       Telecom and Internet Council) (MMTC)
                                                                                                               Commodity                  per        (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’).
                                           Senate, the U.S. House of                                                                     million
                                           Representatives, and the Comptroller                                                                      DATES: Effective June 6, 2016, except for
                                           General of the United States prior to                                                                     the amendments to § 11.21(d) through
                                           publication of the rule in the Federal                      *         *        *            *       *     (f), which contain modifications to
                                           Register. This action is not a ‘‘major                  Berry, low growing, subgroup                      information collection requirements that
                                           rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).                      13–07G, except cranberry ......            3.0 were previously approved by the Office
                                                                                                                                                     of Management and Budget (OMB).
                                           List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                                                                                       *         *        *            *       *     Once OMB has approved the
                                                                                                   Cottonseed subgroup 20C .........             1.0
                                             Environmental protection,                                                                               modifications to these collections, the
                                           Administrative practice and procedure,                      *         *        *            *       *     Commission will publish a document in
                                           Agricultural commodities, Pesticides                    Fruit, pome, group 11–10 ...........        0.20 the Federal Register announcing the
                                           and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping                  Fruit, stone, group 12–12 ...........       0.20 effective date of those paragraphs and
                                           requirements.                                                                                             rule amendments.


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:56 May 05, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00048   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM       06MYR1



Document Created: 2016-05-06 00:30:25
Document Modified: 2016-05-06 00:30:25
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis regulation is effective May 6, 2016. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before July 5, 2016, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ContactSusan Lewis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
FR Citation81 FR 27337 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR