81 FR 27373 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Fox River, DePere to Oshkosh, WI
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 88 (May 6, 2016)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 88 (May 6, 2016)
| Page Range | 27373-27375 | |
| FR Document | 2016-10566 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 27373-27375] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-10566] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [Docket No. USCG-2016-0256] RIN 1625-AA09 Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Fox River, DePere to Oshkosh, WI AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule for all drawbridges over the Fox River between DePere, WI and Oshkosh, WI. A review of the current regulation was requested by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation and the Fox River Navigational System Authority. DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before: June 20, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG- 2016-0256 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge Management Specialist, Ninth Coast Guard District; telephone 216-902-6085, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security E.O. Executive Order FR Federal Register NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking Pub. L. Public Law Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code WIS-DOT Wisconsin Department of Transportation FRNSA Fox River Navigational System Authority CN-RR Canadian National Railroad II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis This proposed rule was requested by WIS-DOT and FRNSA to align drawbridge operating schedules with lock schedules, and make the yearly [[Page 27374]] schedules permanent and easier to follow for the entire river system. The drawbridge and lock schedules that have been set each year by local authorities have generally followed the same dates as the dates in this proposed rule for the beginning and end of the navigation season; April through October. These periods are generally accepted as the established annual schedules by vessel operators and bridge operators on the river system. With no current winter schedule for drawbridges, this proposed rule will also establish permanent winter operating schedules for all drawbridges over Fox River between DePere and Oshkosh, WI. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule The Coast Guard proposes to amend the Fox River regulation at 33 CFR 117.1087. This proposed rule removes George Street Bridge from the regulation, establishes consistent annual dates for drawbridge schedules between river miles 7.13 and 58.3, eliminates currently exempted bridge opening times during certain days and times in Oshkosh, makes permanent the requirement for vessels to provide 2-hours advance notice between midnight and 8 a.m., and establishes the winter bridge operating schedules throughout the entire river system. Currently, the regulation for Fox River drawbridges includes the opening schedule for drawbridges in Green Bay, WI, where large commercial vessel traffic continues to transit. This proposed rule does not include any changes to the schedules for drawbridges over the commercial ship channel in Green Bay. The sections of the current regulation that includes all other drawbridges between river mile 7.13 in DePere, WI at the DePere Pedestrian Bridge, to river mile 58.3 in Oshkosh, WI, describe inconsistent dates and times for required drawbridge openings, particularly for the four highway drawbridges in Oshkosh. They also include a reference to George Street Bridge at mile 7.27. George Street Bridge has been removed since the last update of these regulations. The Oshkosh drawbridges in the current regulation contain exemptions during certain dates and times where the drawbridges are not required to open for vessels or vessels must provide advance notice prior to passing during nighttime hours. This proposed rule establishes the requirement for all drawbridges, except the Canadian National Railroad (CN-RR) Bridge at mile 55.72 in Oshkosh, to open on signal between the hours of 8 a.m. and midnight each day from April 27 to October 7 every year. This schedule would match the lock schedule established by FRNSA and drawbridge schedules used by WIS-DOT. Between the hours of midnight and 8 a.m., except for the CN-RR Bridge in Oshkosh, all drawbridges would open for vessels if at least 2-hours advance notice of arrival is provided. The CN-RR Bridge at mile 55.72 in Oshkosh is located where Fox River feeds into the southwest section of Lake Winnebago. The portion of Fox River in the Oshkosh area, and Lake Winnebago, are among the busiest portions of the Fox River System for recreational vessel traffic. The CN-RR Bridge provides 6 feet of vertical clearance in the closed position and prevents most vessels from passing under the bridge, thereby requiring the drawbridge to open regularly for vessels. This is also the location of first responders and public safety vessels that may require the bridge to open at any time to perform rescue or emergency operations on Lake Winnebago. Vessels in distress or seeking shelter from weather on Lake Winnebago may also need the CN-RR Bridge to open at any time. A delay in bridge openings at this location may endanger life or property and is therefore exempted from the proposed 2-hour advance notice requirement from vessels for all other drawbridges between midnight and 8 a.m. All drawbridges would be required to open if at least 12-hours advance notice is provided prior to passing between October 8 and April 26 each year. The proposed dates, times, and conditions have been employed by local authorities for approximately 10 years and are generally accepted by vessel operators in the area as established conditions. The proposed dates, times, and conditions have also been reviewed and accepted by WIS-DOT and FRNSA during the development of this NPRM. IV. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice during times when vessel traffic is at its lowest. The proposed drawbridge schedule is virtually the same as has been used by vessel operators in the area for approximately 10 years. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule standardizes drawbridge schedules that have been in place and would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator because the bridges will open with advance notice during low traffic times on the waterway or when ice conditions hinder normal navigation. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. [[Page 27375]] C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. V. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions. We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 15086). Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public comments, are in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is published. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS 0 1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2. Revise paragraphs (b) and (c) in Sec. 117.1087 to read as follows: Sec. 117.1087 Fox River. * * * * * (b) All drawbridges between mile 7.13 in DePere and mile 58.3 in Oshkosh, except the Canadian National Railroad Bridge at mile 55.72, shall open as follows: (1) From April 27 through October 7, the draws shall open on signal, except between the hours of midnight and 8 a.m. when the draws shall open if at least 2-hours advance notice is given. (2) From October 8 through April 26, the draws shall open if at least 12-hours advance notice is given. (c) The draw of the Canadian National Railroad Bridge at mile 55.72 shall open on signal, except from October 8 through April 26 when the draw shall open if at least 12-hours advance notice is given. * * * * * Dated: April 21, 2016. J.K. Little, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District, Acting. [FR Doc. 2016-10566 Filed 5-5-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 27373
clients (or who used its own EIN paragraph (b)(17)(i) of this section is DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
immediately prior to entering into a met, a self-employed individual SECURITY
CPEO contract with the CPEO) is not a described in paragraph (b)(14) of this
customer, even if it has entered into a section is treated as a covered employee Coast Guard
CPEO contract with the CPEO. if such individual would be a covered
(7) [The text of proposed § 301.7705– employee but for the exclusion of self- 33 CFR Part 117
1(b)(7) through (13) is the same as the employed individuals from the [Docket No. USCG–2016–0256]
text of § 301.7705–1T(b)(7) through (13) definition of covered employee in
published elsewhere in this issue of the RIN 1625–AA09
paragraph (b)(5) of this section.
Federal Register].
(14) Self-employed individual means (iii) Excluded employees. In Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Fox
an individual with net earnings from determining whether the 85 percent River, DePere to Oshkosh, WI
self-employment (as defined in section threshold described in paragraph
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
1402(a) and without regard to the (b)(17)(i) of this section is met, an
exceptions thereunder) derived from individual that is an excluded employee ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
providing services covered by a CPEO described in section 414(q)(5) is not SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
contract, whether such net earnings treated either as an individual providing modify the operating schedule for all
from self-employment are derived from services or a covered employee. drawbridges over the Fox River between
providing services as a non-employee to DePere, WI and Oshkosh, WI. A review
a customer of the CPEO, from the (iv) Treatment for calendar quarter. A
covered employee will be considered a of the current regulation was requested
individual’s own trade or business as a by the Wisconsin Department of
sole proprietor customer of the CPEO, or work site employee for the entirety of a
calendar quarter if the employee Transportation and the Fox River
as an individual who is a partner in a
qualifies as a work site employee at any Navigational System Authority.
partnership that is a customer of the
CPEO, but only with regard to such net time during that quarter. DATES: Comments and related material
earnings. must reach the Coast Guard on or
(v) Separate determination for each
(15) [The text of proposed § 301.7705– before: June 20, 2016.
work site. The determination of whether
1(b)(15) is the same as the text of a covered employee is a work site ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
§ 301.7705–1T(b)(15) published employee is made separately with identified by docket number USCG–
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal regard to each work site at which the 2016–0256 using Federal eRulemaking
Register]. Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
(16) Work site means a physical covered employee regularly provides
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
location at which an individual services and for each customer for
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
regularly performs services for a which the covered employee is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
customer of a CPEO or, if there is no providing services. A covered employee below for instructions on submitting
such location, the location from which may be determined to be a work site comments.
the customer assigns work to the employee of more than one work site
during a calendar quarter. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
individual. A work site may not be the
you have questions on this proposed
individual’s residence or a telework site (c) [The text of proposed § 301.7705– rule, call or email Mr. Lee D. Soule,
unless the customer requires the 1(c)(1) is the same as the text of Bridge Management Specialist, Ninth
individual to work at that site. For § 301.7705–1T(c)(1) published Coast Guard District; telephone 216–
purposes of this paragraph (b)(16), work elsewhere in this issue of the Federal 902–6085, email Lee.D.Soule@uscg.mil.
sites that are contiguous locations will Register].
be treated as a single physical location SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and thus a single work site, and (2) Definitions related to section 3511.
Paragraphs (b)(3), (5), (6), (14), (16), and I. Table of Abbreviations
noncontiguous locations that are not
reasonably proximate will be treated as (17) of this section are applicable on the CFR Code of Federal Regulations
date of publication of the Treasury DHS Department of Homeland Security
separate physical locations and thus E.O. Executive Order
separate work sites. A CPEO may treat decision adopting these rules as final or
FR Federal Register
noncontiguous locations that are temporary regulations. NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
reasonably proximate as a single of 1969
§ 301.7705–2 CPEO certification process.
physical location and thus a single work NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
site. Any two work sites that are [The text of proposed § 301.7705–2 is RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
separated by 35 or more miles or that the same as the text of § 301.7705–2T SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed
operate in a different industry or published elsewhere in this issue of the rulemaking
industries will not be treated as Pub. L. Public Law
Federal Register]. § Section
reasonably proximate for purposes of U.S.C. United States Code
this paragraph (b)(16). Kirsten B. Wielobob,
WIS–DOT Wisconsin Department of
(17) Work site employee—(i) In Acting Deputy Commissioner for Services and Transportation
general. A work site employee means, Enforcement. FRNSA Fox River Navigational System
with respect to a customer, a covered [FR Doc. 2016–10702 Filed 5–4–16; 4:15 pm] Authority
employee who performs services for
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P CN–RR Canadian National Railroad
such customer at a work site where at
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
least 85 percent of the individuals
Basis
performing services for the customer are
covered employees of the customer. This proposed rule was requested by
(ii) Self-employed individuals. Solely WIS–DOT and FRNSA to align
for purposes of determining whether the drawbridge operating schedules with
85 percent threshold described in lock schedules, and make the yearly
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:57 May 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM 06MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_27461/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 27375
C. Collection of Information rule simply promulgates the operating comments are posted or a final rule is
This proposed rule would call for no regulations or procedures for published.
new collection of information under the drawbridges. Normally such actions are
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 categorically excluded from further
review, under figure 2–1, paragraph Bridges.
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
(32)(e), of the Instruction. For the reasons discussed in the
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
Government the Instruction, an environmental amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
A rule has implications for federalism analysis checklist and a categorical
under Executive Order 13132, exclusion determination are not PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct required for this rule. We seek any OPERATION REGULATIONS
effect on the States, on the relationship comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant ■ 1. The authority citation for part 117
between the national government and continues to read as follows:
the States, or on the distribution of environmental impact from this
power and responsibilities among the proposed rule. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
various levels of government. We have G. Protest Activities No. 0170.1.
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is The Coast Guard respects the First ■ 2. Revise paragraphs (b) and (c) in
consistent with the fundamental Amendment rights of protesters. § 117.1087 to read as follows:
federalism principles and preemption Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER § 117.1087 Fox River.
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132. INFORMATION CONTACT section to * * * * *
Also, this proposed rule does not have coordinate protest activities so that your (b) All drawbridges between mile 7.13
tribal implications under Executive message can be received without in DePere and mile 58.3 in Oshkosh,
Order 13175, Consultation and jeopardizing the safety or security of except the Canadian National Railroad
Coordination with Indian Tribal people, places or vessels. Bridge at mile 55.72, shall open as
Governments, because it would not have follows:
V. Public Participation and Request for (1) From April 27 through October 7,
a substantial direct effect on one or Comments
more Indian tribes, on the relationship the draws shall open on signal, except
between the Federal Government and We view public participation as between the hours of midnight and 8
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of essential to effective rulemaking, and a.m. when the draws shall open if at
power and responsibilities between the will consider all comments and material least 2-hours advance notice is given.
received during the comment period. (2) From October 8 through April 26,
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Your comment can help shape the the draws shall open if at least 12-hours
If you believe this proposed rule has
outcome of this rulemaking. If you advance notice is given.
implications for federalism or Indian
submit a comment, please include the (c) The draw of the Canadian National
tribes, please contact the person listed
docket number for this rulemaking, Railroad Bridge at mile 55.72 shall open
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
indicate the specific section of this on signal, except from October 8
CONTACT section above.
document to which each comment through April 26 when the draw shall
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act applies, and provide a reason for each open if at least 12-hours advance notice
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act suggestion or recommendation. is given.
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires We encourage you to submit * * * * *
Federal agencies to assess the effects of comments through the Federal Dated: April 21, 2016.
their discretionary regulatory actions. In eRulemaking Portal at http:// J.K. Little,
particular, the Act addresses actions www.regulations.gov. If your material
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
that may result in the expenditure by a cannot be submitted using http:// Ninth Coast Guard District, Acting.
State, local, or tribal government, in the www.regulations.gov, contact the person
[FR Doc. 2016–10566 Filed 5–5–16; 8:45 am]
aggregate, or by the private sector of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or CONTACT section of this document for
more in any one year. Though this alternate instructions.
proposed rule will not result in such an We accept anonymous comments. All
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of comments received will be posted DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
this proposed rule elsewhere in this without change to http://
34 CFR Chapter III
preamble. www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have [Docket ID ED–2016–OSERS–0018; CFDA
F. Environment provided. For more about privacy and Number: 84.160D.]
We have analyzed this proposed rule the docket, you may review a Privacy
under Department of Homeland Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Proposed Priority—Training of
Security Management Directive 023–01 Management System in the March 24, Interpreters for Individuals Who Are
and Commandant Instruction 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 Deaf or Hard of Hearing and
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast FR 15086). Individuals Who Are Deaf-Blind
Guard in complying with the National Documents mentioned in this notice, Program
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and all public comments, are in our AGENCY: Office of Special Education and
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and online docket at http:// Rehabilitative Services, Department of
have made a preliminary determination www.regulations.gov and can be viewed Education.
that this action is one of a category of by following that Web site’s ACTION: Proposed priority.
actions which do not individually or instructions. Additionally, if you go to
cumulatively have a significant effect on the online docket and sign up for email SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
the human environment. This proposed alerts, you will be notified when Special Education and Rehabilitative
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 May 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM 06MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_27461/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-05-06 00:29:55
Document Modified: 2016-05-06 00:29:55
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before: June 20, 2016. | |
| Contact | If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge Management Specialist, Ninth Coast Guard District; telephone 216-902-6085, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 27373 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA09 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR