81 FR 27412 - Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Implementation of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 88 (May 6, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 88 (May 6, 2016)
| Page Range | 27412-27414 | |
| FR Document | 2016-10765 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 27412-27414] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-10765] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-821] Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Implementation of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 18, 2016, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) instructed the Department of Commerce (the Department) to implement its determinations under section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA), regarding several countervailing duty (CVD) administrative reviews, which render them not inconsistent with the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement findings in United States-- [[Page 27413]] Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India--(DS436).\1\ The Department issued its final determinations in these section 129 proceedings on April 18, 2015. The Department is now implementing these final determinations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Memorandum to the File, ``Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India, Section 129 Determination (DS436) Placement of Letter from the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to the Secretary of Commerce (dated April 18, 2016),'' (April 25, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective April 18, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric B. Greynolds, Patricia Tran, or Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6071, (202) 482-1503, or (202) 482-7851, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 23, 2015, the Department informed interested parties that it was initiating proceedings under section 129 of the URAA to implement the findings of the WTO dispute settlement panel in DS436.\2\ Specifically, the Department issued preliminary determinations regarding: (1) Facts Available; \3\ and (2) Other Issues.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Notice of Commencement of Compliance Proceedings Pursuant to Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 80 FR 57336 (September 23, 2015). \3\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Section 129(b) Proceeding: United States--Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India (WTO/DS436): Preliminary Determinations of Facts Available,'' (March 17, 2016). \4\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Section 129 Proceeding: United States--Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India (WTO/DS436): Preliminary Determination on Other Issues,'' (March 18, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department invited interested parties to comment on the section 129 preliminary determinations.\5\ After receiving comments, rebuttal comments, and a hearing on April 8, 2016, the Department issued the final determination on April 14, 2016.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Department Memorandum to the File, ``Section 129 Proceedings: United States--Countervailing Duty (CVD) Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Products from India (WTO/DS436): Schedule for written argument and a hearing,'' (March 21, 2016). \6\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Section 129 Proceeding: United States--Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India (WTO/DS436): Final Determination,'' (April 14, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On April 18, 2016, USTR notified the Department that, consistent with section 129(b)(3) of the URAA, consultations with the Department and the appropriate congressional committees with respect to the April 14, 2016, determination have been completed. Also on April 18, 2016, in accordance with section 129(b)(4) of the URAA, USTR directed the Department to implement these determinations. Nature of the Proceedings Section 129 of the URAA governs the nature and effect of determinations issued by the Department to implement findings by WTO dispute settlement panels and the Appellate Body. Specifically, section 129(b)(2) of the URAA provides that ``notwithstanding any provision of the Tariff Act of 1930,'' upon a written request from USTR, the Department shall issue a determination that would render its actions not inconsistent with an adverse finding of a WTO panel or the Appellate Body.\7\ The Statement of Administrative Action, U.R.A.A., H. Doc. 316, Vol. 1, 103d Cong. (1994) (SAA), variously refers to such a determination by the Department as a ``new,'' ``second,'' and ``different'' determination.\8\ After consulting with the Department and the appropriate congressional committees, USTR may direct the Department to implement, in whole or in part, the new determination made under section 129 of the URAA.\9\ Pursuant to section 129(c) of the URAA, the new determination shall apply with respect to unliquidated entries of the subject merchandise that are entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after the date on which USTR directs the Department to implement the new determination.\10\ The new determination is subject to judicial review, separate and apart from judicial review of the Department's original determination.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 U.S.C. 3538(b)(2). \8\ See SAA at 1025, 1027. \9\ See 19 U.S.C. 3538(b)(4). \10\ See 19 U.S.C. 3538(c). \11\ See 19 U.S.C. 1516(a)(2)(B)(vii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determinations: Analysis of Comments Received The issues raised in the comments and rebuttal comments submitted by interested parties to these proceedings are addressed in the final determination. The issues included in the respective final determinations are as follows: (1) Ocean Freight; (2) Whether the CVD Rate Determined for JSW in the Department's 129 Proceeding Supersedes the Amended Final Results for JSW for the 2006 Administrative Review; (3) JSW's Cash Deposit Rate for Future Entries of Hot-rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India; (4A) Iron Ore Benchmarks: Tier I Benchmarks; (4B) Iron Ore Benchmarks: NMDC's export price to Japan; (5) NMDC as a Public Body; (6) Mining Rights of Iron Ore; (7) Mining of Coal; (8) Administration of Section 129 Proceeding; and (9) Specificity of Sale of High-Grade Iron Ore by NMDC. The final determination is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, complete versions of the final determinations can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed version of the final determination and the electronic version of the final determinations are identical in content. Final Determinations: Recalculated Countervailing Duty Rates The recalculated CVD rates are listed below. As indicated, we made changes to the net subsidy rates in certain segments.\12\ The net subsidy rates for the remaining CVD segments in DS436 are unchanged. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India, 73 FR 40295 (July 14, 2008) (2006 Final Results); Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India, 74 FR 20923 (May 6, 2009); (2007 Final Results); and Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India, 75 FR 43488 (July 26, 2010) (2008 Final Results). [[Page 27414]] Amended Countervailable Subsidy Rates Ad Valorem (Percent)--2006 Final Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CVD rate Exporter/producer (administrative Revised CVD rate review) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JSW Steel Ltd................... \13\ 484.41 215.54 Tata Steel Ltd.................. 27.22 18.81 Essar Steel India Limited \14\.. 17.50 15.40 Ispat Industries Ltd............ 15.27 14.82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Amended Countervailable Subsidy Rates Ad Valorem (Percent)--2007 Final Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CVD rate Exporter/producer (administrative Revised CVD rate review) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Essar Steel India Limited \15\ 76.88 68.77 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Amended Countervailable Subsidy Rates Ad Valorem (Percent)--2008 Final Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CVD rate Exporter/producer (administrative Revised CVD rate review) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tata Steel Ltd \16\........... \17\ 577.28 140.18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Implementation of the Revised Cash Deposit Requirements --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ Pursuant to a litigation settlement, the Department published an amended final results; instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requiring the liquidation of entries during the 2006 POR at 76.88 percent; and issued instructions to CBP establishing the future cash deposit rate for JSW Steel Ltd. at the rate of 76.88 percent. See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to Court Decision, 75 FR 80455 (December 22, 2010). \14\ In the 2006 Final Results, Essar Steel India Limited was referred to as Essar Steel Ltd. \15\ In the 2007 Final Results, Essar Steel India Limited was referred to as Essar Steel Ltd. \16\ In the 2008 Final Results, Tata Steel Ltd. was referred to as Tata Steel Limited. \17\ Pursuant to a litigation settlement, the Department published an amended final; calculated the total amount of duties due on the three entries covered by the litigation based on 102.74 percent and issue instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requiring the total amount of duties due to be assessed on the remaining two entries; and issue instructions to CBP establishing the future cash deposit rate for Tata Steel Ltd. at the rate of 102.74 percent. See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to Court Decision, 76 FR 77775 (December 14, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On April 18, 2016, in accordance with sections 129(b)(4) and 129(c)(1)(B) of the URAA and after consulting with the Department and Congress, USTR directed the Department to implement these final determinations. With respect to each of these segments, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to require a cash deposit for estimated countervailing duties at the appropriate rate for each exporter/producer specified above, for entries of subject merchandise, entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after April 18, 2016. This notice of implementation of these section 129 final determination is published in accordance with section 129(c)(2)(A) of the URAA. Dated: April 29, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-10765 Filed 5-5-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![27412 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Notices
Review. An Export Trade Certificate of AARQ’s amendment of its Export 22. Riceland Foods, Inc., Stuttgart,
Review protects the holder and the Trade Certificate of Review results in Arkansas.
members identified in the Certificate the following entities as Members under 23. Riviana Foods Inc., Houston,
from State and Federal government the Certificate: Texas (a subsidiary of Ebro Foods, S.A.
antitrust actions and from private treble 1. ADM Latin, Inc., Decatur, Illinois, (Spain)), for the activities of itself and
damage antitrust actions for the export ADM Grain Company, Decatur, Illinois, its subsidiary, American Rice, Inc.,
conduct specified in the Certificate and and ADM Rice, Inc., Tarrytown, New Houston, Texas.
carried out in compliance with its terms York (subsidiaries of Archer Daniels 24. Sinamco Trading Inc.,
and conditions. The regulations Midland Company). Minneapolis, Minnesota.
implementing Title III are found at 15 2. American Commodity Company, 25. SunFoods LLC, Woodland,
CFR part 325 (2016). LLC, Williams, California. California.
OTEA is issuing this notice pursuant 3. Associated Rice Marketing 26. SunWest Foods, Inc., Davis,
to 15 CFR 325.6(b), which requires the Cooperative (ARMCO), Richvale, California.
Secretary of Commerce to publish a California. 27. The Sun Valley Rice Co., LLC,
summary of the certification in the 4. Bunge Milling, Saint Louis, Arbuckle, California.
Federal Register. Under Section 305(a) Missouri (a subsidiary of Bunge North 28. TRC Trading Corporation,
of the Act and 15 CFR 325.11(a), any America, White Plains, New York), dba Roseville, California (a subsidiary of
person aggrieved by the Secretary’s PIRMI (Pacific International Rice Mills), TRC Group Inc., Roseville, California)
determination may, within 30 days of Woodland, California. and its subsidiary Gulf Rice Arkansas II,
the date of this notice, bring an action 5. Cargill Americas, Inc., and its LLC, Crawfordsville, Arkansas.
in any appropriate district court of the subsidiary CAI Trading, LLC, Coral 29. Trujillo & Sons, Inc., Miami,
United States to set aside the Gables, Florida. Florida.
determination on the ground that the 6. Farmers’ Rice Cooperative, 30. Veetee Foods Inc., Islandia, New
determination is erroneous. Sacramento, California. York (a subsidiary of Veetee
7. Farmers Rice Milling Company, Investments Corporation (Bahamas)).
Description of Amended Certificate Inc., Lake Charles, Louisiana. 31. Wehah Farm, Inc., dba Lundberg
AARQ’s Export Trade Certificate of 8. Far West Rice, Inc., Durham, Family Farms, Richvale, California.
Review has been amended to make the California. No change is has been made regarding
following changes to the list of Members 9. Gulf Pacific Rice Co., Inc., Houston, the Export Trade, Export Trade
covered by the Certificate: Texas; Gulf Rice Milling, Inc., Houston, Activities or Methods of Operation
1. Deleting the following Members Texas; and Harvest Rice, Inc., McGehee, covered by the Certificate.
from its Certificate: Arkansas (each a subsidiary of Gulf The amended Certificate of Review is
a. Family & Sons, Inc., Miami, Florida Pacific, Inc., Houston, Texas). effective from January 11, 2016, the date
b. Noble Logistics USA, Inc., Portland, 10. Gulf Pacific Disc, Inc., Houston, on which the application for an
Oregon Texas. amendment was deemed submitted.
c. Rickmers Rice USA, Inc., Knoxville, 11. Itochu International Inc., Portland,
Tennessee Oregon (a subsidiary of Itochu Dated: May 3, 2016.
d. Texana Rice, Inc., Louise, Texas Corporation (Japan)). Joseph E. Flynn,
2. Changing Nishimoto Trading Co., 12. Interra International, LLC, Chapel Director, Office of Trade and Economic
Ltd., Santa Fe Springs, California (a Hill, North Carolina. Analysis.
subsidiary of Nishimoto Trading 13. JFC International Inc., Los [FR Doc. 2016–10711 Filed 5–5–16; 8:45 am]
Company, Ltd. (Japan) to Nishimoto Angeles, California (a subsidiary of BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
Trading Co., Ltd. dba Wismettac Asian Kikkoman Corp.).
Foods, Santa Fe Springs, California (a 14. JIT Products, Inc., Davis,
subsidiary of Nishimoto Trading California. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Company, Ltd. (Japan). 15. Kennedy Rice Dryers, L.L.C., Mer
3. Changing PS International, LLC dba Rouge, Louisiana. International Trade Administration
PS International Ltd., Chapel Hill, North 16. Kitoku America, Inc., Burlingame, [C–533–821]
Carolina (jointly owned by Seaboard California (a subsidiary of Kitoku
Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri and Shinryo Co., Ltd. (Japan)). Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
PS Trading Inc., Chapel Hill, North 17. LD Commodities Rice Products From India: Implementation
Carolina) to Interra International, LLC, Merchandising LLC, Wilton, of Determinations Under Section 129
Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Connecticut, and LD Commodities of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
4. Changing TRC Trading Corporation, Interior Rice Merchandising LLC,
Roseville, California (a subsidiary of Kansas City, Missouri (subsidiaries of AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
TRC Group Inc., Roseville, California) Louis Dreyfus Commodities LLC, International Trade Administration,
and its subsidiary Gulf Rice Arkansas II, Wilton, Connecticut). Department of Commerce.
LLC, Houston, Texas to TRC Trading 18. Louisiana Rice Mill, LLC, SUMMARY: On April 18, 2016, the U.S.
Corporation, Roseville, California (a Mermentau, Louisiana. Trade Representative (USTR) instructed
subsidiary of TRC Group Inc., Roseville, 19. Nidera US LLC, Wilton, the Department of Commerce (the
California) and its subsidiary Gulf Rice Connecticut (a subsidiary of Nidera BV Department) to implement its
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Arkansas II, LLC, Crawfordsville, (Netherlands)). determinations under section 129 of the
Arkansas. 20. Nishimoto Trading Co., Ltd. dba Uruguay Round Agreements Act
5. Changing Veetee Rice, Inc., Great Wismettac Asian Foods, Santa Fe (URAA), regarding several
Neck, New York (a subsidiary of Veetee Springs, California (a subsidiary of countervailing duty (CVD)
Investments Corporation (Bahamas)) to Nishimoto Trading Company, Ltd. administrative reviews, which render
Veetee Foods Inc., Islandia, New York (a (Japan). them not inconsistent with the World
subsidiary of Veetee Investments 21. Producers Rice Mill, Inc., Trade Organization (WTO) dispute
Corporation (Bahamas)). Stuttgart, Arkansas. settlement findings in United States—
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 May 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_27500/page/1.svg)
![27414 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Notices
AMENDED COUNTERVAILABLE SUBSIDY RATES AD VALOREM (PERCENT)—2006 FINAL RESULTS
CVD rate Revised
Exporter/producer (administrative CVD rate
review)
JSW Steel Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 13 484.41 215.54
Tata Steel Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 27.22 18.81
Essar Steel India Limited 14 ..................................................................................................................... 17.50 15.40
Ispat Industries Ltd .................................................................................................................................. 15.27 14.82
AMENDED COUNTERVAILABLE SUBSIDY RATES AD VALOREM (PERCENT)—2007 FINAL RESULTS
CVD rate Revised
Exporter/producer (administrative CVD rate
review)
Essar Steel India Limited 15 ..................................................................................................................... 76.88 68.77
AMENDED COUNTERVAILABLE SUBSIDY RATES AD VALOREM (PERCENT)—2008 FINAL RESULTS
CVD rate Revised
Exporter/producer (administrative CVD rate
review)
Tata Steel Ltd 16 ...................................................................................................................................... 17 577.28 140.18
Implementation of the Revised Cash or withdrawn from warehouse, for ensuring public safety and economic
Deposit Requirements consumption, on or after April 18, 2016. and national security, fostering
On April 18, 2016, in accordance with This notice of implementation of these discovery and development of new
sections 129(b)(4) and 129(c)(1)(B) of the section 129 final determination is technical solutions, and bolstering
URAA and after consulting with the published in accordance with section partnerships between Federal, state,
Department and Congress, USTR 129(c)(2)(A) of the URAA. local, tribal and territorial governments
directed the Department to implement Dated: April 29, 2016. and the private sector in the
these final determinations. With respect Ronald K. Lorentzen, development, promotion, and use of
to each of these segments, the cybersecurity technologies, policies, and
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Compliance. best practices. All sessions will be open
and Border Protection to require a cash to the public.
[FR Doc. 2016–10765 Filed 5–5–16; 8:45 am]
deposit for estimated countervailing BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DATES: The meeting will be held on
duties at the appropriate rate for each Monday, May 16, 2016, from 9:00 a.m.
exporter/producer specified above, for until 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
entries of subject merchandise, entered DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the NYU School of Law, Center on Law
13 Pursuant to a litigation settlement, the National Institute of Standards and and Security, in Vanderbilt Hall, located
Department published an amended final results; Technology
instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection at 40 Washington Square South, New
(CBP) requiring the liquidation of entries during the
Open Meeting of the Commission on York, New York. The meeting is open to
2006 POR at 76.88 percent; and issued instructions the public and interested parties are
to CBP establishing the future cash deposit rate for Enhancing National Cybersecurity
JSW Steel Ltd. at the rate of 76.88 percent. See requested to contact Melanie Cook in
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From AGENCY: National Institute of Standards advance of the meeting for building
India: Amended Final Results of Countervailing and Technology, Commerce. entrance requirements.
Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to Court
ACTION: Notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Decision, 75 FR 80455 (December 22, 2010).
14 In the 2006 Final Results, Essar Steel India
SUMMARY: The Commission on Melanie Cook, Information Technology
Limited was referred to as Essar Steel Ltd. Laboratory, National Institute of
15 In the 2007 Final Results, Essar Steel India Enhancing National Cybersecurity (the
‘‘Commission’’) will meet Monday, May Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau
Limited was referred to as Essar Steel Ltd.
16 In the 2008 Final Results, Tata Steel Ltd. was 16, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Drive, Stop 8930, Gaithersburg, MD
referred to as Tata Steel Limited. Eastern Time in Vanderbilt Hall at the 20899–8930, telephone: (301) 975–5259,
17 Pursuant to a litigation settlement, the
New York University (NYU) School of or by email at: melanie.cook@nist.gov.
Department published an amended final; calculated
the total amount of duties due on the three entries Law, Center on Law and Security SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
located at 40 Washington Square South, to the Federal Advisory Committee Act,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
covered by the litigation based on 102.74 percent
and issue instructions to U.S. Customs and Border New York, New York. The primary as amended, 5 U.S.C. App., notice is
Protection (CBP) requiring the total amount of purpose of the meeting is to discuss the hereby given that the Commission on
duties due to be assessed on the remaining two
entries; and issue instructions to CBP establishing challenges and opportunities facing the Enhancing National Cybersecurity will
the future cash deposit rate for Tata Steel Ltd. at finance and insurance sectors as the meet Monday, May 16, 2016, from 9:00
the rate of 102.74 percent. See Certain Hot-Rolled Commission develops detailed a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. All
Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Amended
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
recommendations to strengthen sessions will be open to the public. The
Review Pursuant to Court Decision, 76 FR 77775 cybersecurity in both the public and Commission is authorized by Executive
(December 14, 2011). private sectors while protecting privacy, Order 13718, Commission on Enhancing
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 May 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_27500/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-05-06 00:29:43
Document Modified: 2016-05-06 00:29:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective April 18, 2016. | |
| Contact | Eric B. Greynolds, Patricia Tran, or Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6071, (202) 482-1503, or (202) 482-7851, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 27412 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR