81 FR 29528 - Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 92 (May 12, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 92 (May 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 29528-29530 | |
| FR Document | 2016-11249 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 29528-29530] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-11249] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-983] Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on drawn stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from the People's Republic of China (PRC), for the period of review (POR), April 1, 2014, through March 31, 2015. We preliminarily find that respondent Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan) made sales of the subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (NV). In addition, we preliminarily find that the other mandatory respondents, B&R Industries Limited (B&R Industries), Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development Corporation (Newecan), and Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd./ Superte invoiced as Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd. (Superte), are part of the PRC-wide entity and will receive the rate of that entity, which is not under review. We are also preliminarily granting separate rates to Feidong Import and Export Co., Ltd. (Feidong) and Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Afa),\1\ which demonstrated eligibility for separate rate status, but were not selected for individual examination. Additionally, we are preliminarily including nine companies \2\ that failed to demonstrate their entitlement to a separate rate as part of the PRC-wide entity. Finally, we preliminarily find that Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd. (Kehuaxing) made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results of this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ On March 21, 2016, the Department determined that Ningbo Afa is the successor-in-interest to Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Yuyao Afa), and stated that Ningbo Afa will be assigned an updated cash deposit rate based on the final results of this administrative review. See Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China, 81 FR 16138, 16139 (March 25, 2016). \2\ These nine companies are: (1) J&C Industries Enterprise Limited (J&C Industries); (2) Foshan Shunde MingHao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. (MingHao); (3) Franke Asia Sourcing Ltd. (Franke); (4) Grand Hill Work Company (Grand Hill); (5) Hangzhou Heng's Industries Co., Ltd. (Heng's Industries); (6) Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd. (Hongmao); (7) Jiangxi Zoje Kitchen & Bath Industry Co., Ltd. (Zoje); (8) Ningbo Oulin Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Oulin); (9) Shunde Foodstuffs Import & Export Company Limited of Guangdong (Shunde Foodstuffs). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian C. Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-1823, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The products covered by the order include drawn stainless steel sinks. Imports of subject merchandise are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China,'' issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tolling of Deadline of Preliminary Results of Review As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent closure of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & Compliance, ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas'' (January 27, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For the mandatory respondent Dongyuan, export prices were calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy (NME) within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV was calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov; the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is also available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete [[Page 29529]] version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on Enforcement and Compliance's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as the Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On June 24, 2015, Kehuaxing submitted a timely-filed certification that it had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\5\ Additionally, our inquiry to CBP did not identify any POR entries of Kehuaxing's subject merchandise. Based on the foregoing, the Department preliminarily determines that Kehuaxing did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Letter from Kehuaxing, ``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from People's Republic of China; A-570-983; Certification of No Sales by Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd.'' (June 24, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consistent with our practice in NME cases, the Department is not rescinding this administrative review for Kehuaxing, but intends to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) (NME AD Assessment) and the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review Because B&R Industries, Newecan, and Superte withdrew from participation in the review and did not respond to the Department's requests for information, the Department preliminarily finds these companies to be part of the PRC-wide entity.\7\ Additionally, because Shunde Foodstuffs, Franke, Grand Hill, Heng's Industries, Hongmao, J&C Industries, MingHao, Ningbo Oulin, and Zoje did not submit a separate rate application or certification by the deadline established in the Initiation Notice, or make a claim that they had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR, we preliminarily find that these companies failed to establish their entitlement to a separate rate, and therefore, remain a part of the PRC-wide entity. The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity is 76.45 percent.\8\ This rate is not under review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Pursuant to the Department's change in practice, the Department no longer considers the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). Under this practice, the NME entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the entity, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate is not subject to change. \8\ The PRC-wide rate determined in the investigation was 76.53 percent. See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592 (April 11, 2013). This rate was adjusted for export subsidies and estimated domestic subsidy pass through to determine the cash deposit rate (76.45 percent) collected for companies in the PRC-wide entity. See explanation in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Investigation, Final Determination, 78 FR 13019 (February 26, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period April 1, 2014, through March 31, 2015: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporters dumping margin (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd...... 1.65 Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd *.................. 1.65 Feidong Import and Export Co., Ltd *.................... 1.65 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * This company demonstrated that it qualified for a separate rate in this administrative review. Consistent with the Department's practice, we preliminarily assigned this company a rate of 1.65 percent--the rate calculated for the mandatory respondent in this review.\9\ Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose to the parties the calculations performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\10\ Rebuttals to case briefs may be filed no later than five days after the written comments are filed, and all rebuttal comments must be limited to comments raised in the case briefs.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Stainless Steel Bar From India: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 39467 (July 3, 2012) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 12. \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice.\12\ Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\14\ The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Dongyuan, if we continue to calculate a weighted-average dumping margin that is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results, we will calculate importer- (or customer-) specific per-unit duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's (or customer's) examined sales to the total sales quantity associated with those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\15\ The Department will also calculate (estimated) ad valorem importer-specific assessment rates with which to assess whether the per-unit assessment rate is de minimis. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer- specific ad valorem assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de minimis. Where either Dongyuan's ad valorem weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de [[Page 29530]] minimis, or an importer-(or customer-) specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,\16\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). \16\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Feidong and Ningbo Afa, the respondents which were not selected for individual examination in this administrative review and which qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate will be equal to the rate calculated for the mandatory respondent in this review (i.e., 1.65 percent).\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 80 FR 26227, 26228 (May 7, 2015); unchanged in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014, 80 FR 69644 (November 10, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the final results, if we continue to treat the non-responding mandatory respondents B&R Industries, Newecan, and Superte, as part of the PRC-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 76.45 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by those companies. The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by the company individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if we continue to find that Kehuaxing had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries of subject merchandise from Kehuaxing will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ For a full discussion of this practice, see NME AD Assessment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: May 5, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology A. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments B. Non-Market Economy Country Status C. Separate Rates Determination 1. Absence of De Jure Control 2. Absence of De Facto Control 3. Separate Rate for Non-Selected Companies D. Companies Preliminarily Considered Part of the PRC-Wide Entity 1. B&R Industries, Newecan, and Superte 2. Shunde Foodstuffs, Franke, Grand Hill, Heng's Industries, Hongmao, J&C Industries, MingHao, Ningbo Oulin, and Zoje E. Surrogate Country 1. Economic Comparability 2. Significant Producer of Comparable Merchandise 3. Data Availability F. Date of Sale G. Comparisons to Normal Value 1. Determination of Comparison Method 2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis 3. Export Price 4. VAT 5. Normal Value H. Factor Valuation Methodology I. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act J. Currency Conversion V. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2016-11249 Filed 5-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![29528 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2016 / Notices
(duty rates–free to 3.1%) for the foreign- Industrial Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan) made Scope of the Order
status inputs noted below. Customs sales of the subject merchandise in the The products covered by the order
duties also could possibly be deferred or United States at prices below normal include drawn stainless steel sinks.
reduced on foreign-status production value (NV). In addition, we Imports of subject merchandise are
equipment. preliminarily find that the other currently classified under the
The components sourced from abroad mandatory respondents, B&R Industries Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
include: Radial and bias-ply tires for Limited (B&R Industries), Zhongshan United States (HTSUS) subheadings
agricultural machinery, forklifts, ATVs, Newecan Enterprise Development 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010.
golf carts, lawn and garden equipment, Corporation (Newecan), and Zhongshan Although the HTSUS subheadings are
and passenger cars; specialty tire (ST)- Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd./Superte provided for convenience and customs
rated radial and bias-ply tires for invoiced as Foshan Zhaoshun Trade purposes, the written description of the
trailers; steel and aluminum wheels for Co., Ltd. (Superte), are part of the PRC- scope of the order is dispositive.3
agricultural machinery, trailers, golf wide entity and will receive the rate of
carts, ATVs, forklifts, and lawn and that entity, which is not under review. Tolling of Deadline of Preliminary
garden equipment; and, steel and We are also preliminarily granting Results of Review
aluminum wheel parts (duty rates range separate rates to Feidong Import and As explained in the memorandum
from free to 4%). Export Co., Ltd. (Feidong) and Ningbo from the Acting Assistant Secretary for
Public comment is invited from Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Enforcement and Compliance, the
interested parties. Submissions shall be Afa),1 which demonstrated eligibility for Department has exercised its discretion
addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive separate rate status, but were not to toll all administrative deadlines due
Secretary at the address below. The selected for individual examination. to the recent closure of the Federal
closing period for their receipt is June Additionally, we are preliminarily Government. All deadlines in this
21, 2016. including nine companies 2 that failed segment of the proceeding have been
A copy of the notification will be to demonstrate their entitlement to a extended by four business days.4
available for public inspection at the separate rate as part of the PRC-wide
Office of the Executive Secretary, Methodology
entity. Finally, we preliminarily find
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room that Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial The Department is conducting this
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, Ltd. (Kehuaxing) made no shipments of review in accordance with section
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., subject merchandise during the POR. If 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the these preliminary results are adopted in amended (the Act). For the mandatory
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ the final results of this review, we will respondent Dongyuan, export prices
Board’s Web site, which is accessible instruct U.S. Customs and Border were calculated in accordance with
via www.trade.gov/ftz. Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC
For further information, contact Diane is a non-market economy (NME) within
duties on all appropriate entries.
Finver at Diane.Finver@trade.gov or the meaning of section 771(18) of the
Interested parties are invited to
(202) 482–1367. Act, NV was calculated in accordance
comment on these preliminary results.
Dated: May 5, 2016. with section 773(c) of the Act.
Andrew McGilvray, DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2016. For a full description of the
Executive Secretary. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: methodology underlying our
[FR Doc. 2016–11236 Filed 5–11–16; 8:45 am] Brian C. Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/ conclusions, see the Preliminary
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement Decision Memorandum. The
and Compliance, International Trade Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
Administration, U.S. Department of public document and is on file
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue electronically via Enforcement and
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Compliance’s Antidumping and
International Trade Administration (202) 482–1766 and (202) 482–1823, Countervailing Duty Centralized
respectively. Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
[A–570–983]
ACCESS is available to registered users
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: at http://access.trade.gov; the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
Preliminary Results of the 1 On March 21, 2016, the Department determined also available to all parties in the
Antidumping Duty Administrative that Ningbo Afa is the successor-in-interest to Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Yuyao Afa), and the main Department of Commerce
Review and Preliminary Determination stated that Ningbo Afa will be assigned an updated
of No Shipments; 2014–2015 cash deposit rate based on the final results of this building. In addition, a complete
administrative review. See Notice of Final Results
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 3 For a complete description of the Scope of the
International Trade Administration, Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the Order, see Memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Department of Commerce. People’s Republic of China, 81 FR 16138, 16139 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
(March 25, 2016). Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 2 These nine companies are: (1) J&C Industries Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
(Department) is conducting an Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Enterprise Limited (J&C Industries); (2) Foshan
administrative review of the Shunde MingHao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
(MingHao); (3) Franke Asia Sourcing Ltd. (Franke); Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks
antidumping duty order on drawn (4) Grand Hill Work Company (Grand Hill); (5) from the People’s Republic of China,’’ issued
stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from Hangzhou Heng’s Industries Co., Ltd. (Heng’s concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Industries); (6) Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd. notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
for the period of review (POR), April 1, (Hongmao); (7) Jiangxi Zoje Kitchen & Bath Industry 4 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
Co., Ltd. (Zoje); (8) Ningbo Oulin Kitchen Utensils Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement &
2014, through March 31, 2015. We Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Oulin); (9) Shunde Foodstuffs Compliance, ‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines
preliminarily find that respondent Import & Export Company Limited of Guangdong As a Result of the Government Closure During
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware (Shunde Foodstuffs). Snowstorm Jonas’’ (January 27, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:02 May 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_29620/page/1.svg)
![29530 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2016 / Notices
minimis, or an importer-(or customer-) proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 2. Results of the Differential Pricing
specific ad valorem assessment rate is continue to be the existing exporter- Analysis
zero or de minimis,16 we will instruct specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of 3. Export Price
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries subject merchandise that have not been 4. VAT
5. Normal Value
without regard to antidumping duties. found to be entitled to a separate rate, H. Factor Valuation Methodology
For Feidong and Ningbo Afa, the the cash deposit rate will be the rate for I. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the
respondents which were not selected for the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45 Act
individual examination in this percent; and (4) for all non-PRC J. Currency Conversion
administrative review and which exporters of subject merchandise which V. Conclusion
qualified for a separate rate, the have not received their own rate, the [FR Doc. 2016–11249 Filed 5–11–16; 8:45 am]
assessment rate will be equal to the rate cash deposit rate will be the rate BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
calculated for the mandatory respondent applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
in this review (i.e., 1.65 percent).17 supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
For the final results, if we continue to deposit requirements, when imposed, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
treat the non-responding mandatory shall remain in effect until further
respondents B&R Industries, Newecan, notice. International Trade Administration
and Superte, as part of the PRC-wide
entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an Notification to Importers [A–570–893]
ad valorem assessment rate of 76.45
This notice also serves as a Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
percent to all entries of subject
preliminary reminder to importers of From the People’s Republic of China:
merchandise during the POR which
their responsibility under 19 CFR Rescission of Antidumping Duty
were produced and/or exported by those
companies. 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding Administrative Review; 2015–2016
The Department announced a the reimbursement of antidumping and/
or countervailing duties prior to AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
refinement to its assessment practice in International Trade Administration,
NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to Department of Commerce.
in practice, for entries that were not
comply with this requirement could SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
reported in the U.S. sales database
result in the Secretary’s presumption (‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the
submitted by the company individually
examined during this review, the that reimbursement of antidumping administrative review of the
Department will instruct CBP to and/or countervailing duties occurred antidumping duty order on certain
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide and the subsequent assessment of frozen warmwater shrimp (‘‘shrimp’’)
rate. In addition, if we continue to find double antidumping duties. from the People’s Republic of China
that Kehuaxing had no shipments of the We are issuing and publishing these (‘‘PRC’’) for the period February 1, 2015
subject merchandise, any suspended preliminary results of review in through January 31, 2016.
entries of subject merchandise from accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2016.
Kehuaxing will be liquidated at the 777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PRC-wide rate.18 Dated: May 5, 2016. Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations,
Cash Deposit Requirements Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
Paul Piquado,
International Trade Administration,
The following cash deposit Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
requirements will be effective upon Compliance.
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
publication of the final results of this Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
administrative review for all shipments the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 482–2593.
of the subject merchandise from the PRC
I. Summary SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
II. Background
for consumption on or after the III. Scope of the Order
Background
publication date, as provided for by IV. Discussion of the Methodology On April 7, 2016, based on a timely
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For A. Preliminary Determination of No request for review on behalf of the Ad
the companies listed above that have a Shipments Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will B. Non-Market Economy Country Status (‘‘Petitioner’’) 1 and the American
be that rate established in the final C. Separate Rates Determination
Shrimp Processors Association
results of this review (except, if the rate 1. Absence of De Jure Control
2. Absence of De Facto Control (‘‘Domestic Processors’’),2 the
is zero or de minimis, then a cash
3. Separate Rate for Non-Selected Department published in the Federal
deposit rate of zero will be established
Companies Register a notice of initiation of an
for that company); (2) for previously
D. Companies Preliminarily Considered administrative review of the
investigated or reviewed PRC and non- Part of the PRC-Wide Entity antidumping duty order on shrimp from
PRC exporters that received a separate 1. B&R Industries, Newecan, and Superte
rate in a prior segment of this 2. Shunde Foodstuffs, Franke, Grand Hill, 1 See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from
Heng’s Industries, Hongmao, J&C the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee
16 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Industries, MingHao, Ningbo Oulin, and (‘‘AHSTAC’’) ‘‘Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the from the People’s Republic of China: Request for
Zoje
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of E. Surrogate Country Administrative Reviews’’ (February 24, 2016).
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 80 FR 1. Economic Comparability 2 See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from
26227, 26228 (May 7, 2015); unchanged in Drawn the American Shrimp Processors Association
Stainless Steel Sinks From the People’s Republic of
2. Significant Producer of Comparable
(‘‘ASPA’’) ‘‘Administrative Review of the
China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Merchandise Antidumping Duty Order Covering Frozen
Administrative Review; 2012–2014, 80 FR 69644 3. Data Availability Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s Republic of
(November 10, 2015). F. Date of Sale China (POR 11: 02/01/15–01/31/16): American
18 For a full discussion of this practice, see NME G. Comparisons to Normal Value Shrimp Processors Association’s Request for an
AD Assessment. 1. Determination of Comparison Method Administrative Review’’ (February 29, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:02 May 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_29620/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-05-12 01:07:30
Document Modified: 2016-05-12 01:07:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brian C. Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-1823, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 29528 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR