81 FR 2989 - Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River, MO and IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 12 (January 20, 2016)

Page Range		2989-2991
FR Document		2016-01017

The Coast Guard is establishing emergency temporary safety zones for all waters of the Upper Mississippi River (UMR) between miles 109.9 and 185.5 and all waters of the Illinois River (ILR) between miles 0 and 128.9. The emergency safety zones are needed to protect persons, property, and infrastructure from potential damage and safety hazards associated with high waters. Entry of vessels or persons into these zones is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP). Deviation from the safety zones may be requested and will be considered on a case-by-case basis as specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 12 (Wednesday, January 20, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 20, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2989-2991]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01017]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-1121]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River, MO and 
IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing emergency temporary safety 
zones for all waters of the Upper Mississippi River (UMR) between miles 
109.9 and 185.5 and all waters of the Illinois River (ILR) between 
miles 0 and 128.9. The emergency safety zones are needed to protect 
persons, property, and infrastructure from potential damage and safety 
hazards associated with high waters. Entry of vessels or persons into 
these zones is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain 
of the Port (COTP). Deviation from the safety zones may be requested 
and will be considered on a case-by-case basis as specifically 
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or a designated 
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from January 20, 
2016 until 11:59 p.m. on January 22, 2016. For the purposes of 
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 3:00 p.m. on December 28, 
2015 until January 20, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-1121 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

BNM Broadcast Notice to Mariners
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
ILR Illinois River
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
UMR Upper Mississippi River
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because of the increased safety risks caused 
by high waters on the UMR and ILR. On December 28, 2015, the Coast 
Guard determined that immediate action is necessary to establish 
emergency safety zones to protect life and property from the hazards 
associated with and resulting from high waters. It is impracticable to 
publish an NPRM because we must establish these safety zones by 
December 28, 2015. Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNM) and information 
sharing with waterway users will update mariners of the closures and 
enforcement times during this emergency situation.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. Providing 30 days 
notice would be contrary to public interest because immediate action is 
needed to protect life and property from the hazards associated with 
and resulting from high waters.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River determined that 
potential hazards associated with and resulting from high waters and 
related recovery efforts are present in the area. These hazards require 
additional safety measures in the form of safety zones extending from 
mile 109.9 to 185.5 on the UMR and mile 0 to 128.9 on the ILR to 
protect those operating in the area and for the Coast Guard to maintain 
navigational safety.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing two temporary emergency safety 
zones prohibiting access to the UMR between miles 109.9 and 185.5 and 
the ILR between miles 0 and 128.9, extending the entire widths of the 
rivers beginning at 3:00 p.m. on December 28, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. 
on January 22, 2016 or until waters recede and conditions allow for 
safe navigation, whichever occurs earlier. Deviation from the emergency 
safety zones may be requested and will be considered on a case-by-case 
basis as specifically authorized by the COTP or a designated 
representative. Deviation requests will

[[Page 2990]]

be considered and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The COTP may be 
contacted by telephone at 314-269-2332 or can be reached by VHF-FM 
channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This rule establishes 
temporary emergency safety zones placing restrictions on vessels 
transiting the UMR between miles 109.9 and 185.5 and the ILR between 
miles 0 and 128.9. Notifications of enforcement times will be 
communicated to the marine community via BNM. The impacts on navigation 
will be limited to ensure the safety of mariners and vessels during 
hazardous conditions associated with high waters.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zones may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V. A. above, this rule will not have significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175, 
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because 
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian 
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian 
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has 
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person 
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a closure of the UMR between miles 109.9 and 185.5 and 
the ILR between miles 0 and 128.9. It is categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant 
Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting 
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are 
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any 
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

[[Page 2991]]


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-1121 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T08-1121  Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River between miles 
109.9 and 185.5; and Illinois River between miles 0 and 128.9; MO and 
IL.

    (a) Location. The following areas are safety zones:
    (1) All waters of the Upper Mississippi River between miles 109.9 
and 185.5, extending the entire width of the river; and
    (2) All waters of the Illinois River between miles 0 and 128.9, 
extending the entire width of the river.
    (b) Definitions. Designated representative means a Coast Guard 
Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or 
other officers operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and 
local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP) 
Upper Mississippi River in the enforcement of the safety zones.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in 
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zones described in 
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the 
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's 
representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or through Coast Guard Sector 
Upper Mississippi River at 314-269-2332. Those in the safety zones must 
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP 
or the COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement periods. This rule is effective from 3:00 p.m. on 
December 28, 2015 through 11:59 p.m. on January 22, 2016, or until 
waters recede and conditions allow for safe navigation, whichever 
occurs first.
    (e) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated 
representative will inform the public through broadcasts notice to 
mariners of the enforcement period for the emergency safety zones as 
well as any changes in the dates and times of enforcement.

    Dated: December 28, 2015.
R.S. Rhodes,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Alternate Captain of the Port Upper 
Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2016-01017 Filed 1-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

2990 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

be considered and reviewed on a case- understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
by-case basis. The COTP may be would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions
contacted by telephone at 314–269– organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
2332 or can be reached by VHF–FM jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
channel 16. concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
V. Regulatory Analyses
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
We developed this rule after CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure,
considering numerous statutes and Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
executive orders (E.O.s) related to on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
rulemaking. Below we summarize our who enforce, or otherwise determine
analyses based on a number of these compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
Amendment rights of protestors. Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
A. Regulatory Planning and Review and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in
to assess the costs and benefits of annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National
available regulatory alternatives and, if responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
regulation is necessary, to select wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
regulatory approaches that maximize employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not
importance of quantifying both costs Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a
and benefits, of reducing costs, of small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human
harmonizing rules, and of promoting about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves a
flexibility. This rule has not been of the Coast Guard. closure of the UMR between miles 109.9
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory and 185.5 and the ILR between miles 0
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, C. Collection of Information
and 128.9. It is categorically excluded
it has not been reviewed by the Office This rule will not call for a new from further review under paragraph
of Management and Budget. This rule collection of information under the 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
establishes temporary emergency safety Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Instruction. A preliminary
zones placing restrictions on vessels U.S.C. 3501–3520). environmental analysis checklist
transiting the UMR between miles 109.9 supporting this determination and a
and 185.5 and the ILR between miles 0 D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments Categorical Exclusion Determination are
and 128.9. Notifications of enforcement available in the docket where indicated
times will be communicated to the A rule has implications for federalism under ADDRESSES. We seek any
marine community via BNM. The under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has comments or information that may lead
impacts on navigation will be limited to a substantial direct effect on the States, to the discovery of a significant
ensure the safety of mariners and on the relationship between the national environmental impact from this rule.
vessels during hazardous conditions government and the States, or on the
associated with high waters. distribution of power and G. Protest Activities
responsibilities among the various The Coast Guard respects the First
B. Impact on Small Entities levels of government. We have analyzed Amendment rights of protesters.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of this rule under that Order and have Protesters are asked to contact the
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, determined that it is consistent with the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
requires Federal agencies to consider fundamental federalism principles and INFORMATION CONTACT section to
the potential impact of regulations on preemption requirements described in coordinate protest activities so that your
small entities during rulemaking. The E.O. 13132. message can be received without
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Also, this rule does not have tribal jeopardizing the safety or security of
businesses, not-for-profit organizations implications under E.O. 13175, people, places or vessels.
that are independently owned and Consultation and Coordination with
operated and are not dominant in their Indian Tribal Governments, because it List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
fields, and governmental jurisdictions does not have a substantial direct effect Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
with populations of less than 50,000. on one or more Indian tribes, on the (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. relationship between the Federal requirements, Security measures,
605(b) that this rule will not have a Government and Indian tribes, or on the Waterways.
significant economic impact on a distribution of power and For the reasons discussed in the
substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you CFR part 165 as follows:
vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for
zones may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
reasons stated in section V. A. above, contact the person listed in the FOR AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES

this rule will not have significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
economic impact on any vessel owner above. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
or operator. continues to read as follows:
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Department of Homeland Security Delegation
we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of No. 0170.1.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:15 Jan 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM 20JAR1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 2991

■ 2. Add § 165.T08–1121 to read as ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION the Internet and will be publicly
follows: AGENCY available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
§ 165.T08–1121 Safety Zone; Upper 40 CFR Part 52 available through www.regulations.gov
Mississippi River between miles 109.9 and or may be viewed during normal
185.5; and Illinois River between miles 0 [EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0475; FRL–9941–36–
Region 3] business hours at the Air Protection
and 128.9; MO and IL.
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
(a) Location. The following areas are Approval and Promulgation of Air Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
safety zones: Quality Implementation Plans; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Pennsylvania; Allegheny County’s Copies of the state submittal are
(1) All waters of the Upper
Adoption of Control Techniques available at the Allegheny County
Mississippi River between miles 109.9
Guidelines for Four Industry Health Department, Bureau of
and 185.5, extending the entire width of Categories for Control of Volatile Environmental Quality, Division of Air
the river; and Organic Compound Emissions Quality, 301 39th Street, Pittsburgh,
(2) All waters of the Illinois River Pennsylvania 15201 and at the
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
between miles 0 and 128.9, extending Pennsylvania Department of
Agency (EPA).
the entire width of the river. Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air
ACTION: Final rule.
(b) Definitions. Designated Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400
representative means a Coast Guard SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Patrol Commander, including a Coast Agency (EPA) is converting a 17105.
Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other conditional approval of a state FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
officers operating a Coast Guard vessel implementation plan (SIP) revision Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
and a Federal, State, and local officer submitted by the Commonwealth of email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
designated by or assisting the Captain of Pennsylvania on behalf of the Allegheny SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the Port (COTP) Upper Mississippi County Health Department (ACHD) to a
full approval. This SIP revision includes I. Background
River in the enforcement of the safety
amendments to the ACHD Rules and Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides
zones.
Regulations, Article XXI, Air Pollution that SIPs for nonattainment areas must
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general Control, and meets the requirement to include reasonably available control
safety zone regulations in subpart C of adopt reasonably available control measures (RACM), including RACT, for
this part, you may not enter the safety technology (RACT) for sources covered sources of emissions. Section
zones described in paragraph (a) of this by EPA’s control techniques guidelines 182(b)(2)(A) provides that for certain
section unless authorized by the COTP (CTG) for the following categories: nonattainment areas, states must revise
or the COTP’s designated representative. miscellaneous metal and/or plastic parts their SIP to include RACT for sources of
surface coating processes; automobile VOC emissions covered by a CTG
(2) To seek permission to enter,
and light-duty truck assembly coatings; document issued after November 15,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
miscellaneous industrial adhesives; and 1990 and prior to the area’s date of
representative via VHF–FM channel 16, fiberglass boat manufacturing materials.
or through Coast Guard Sector Upper attainment. In 2008, EPA developed
Upon review of the submittal, EPA new CTGs for miscellaneous metal and
Mississippi River at 314–269–2332. found that the average monomer volatile
Those in the safety zones must comply plastic parts coatings, automobile and
organic compound (VOC) content limits light-duty assembly coatings,
with all lawful orders or directions were referenced but not included in the
given to them by the COTP or the miscellaneous industrial adhesives, and
regulation for fiberglass boat fiberglass boat manufacturing materials.
COTP’s designated representative. manufacturing materials. ACHD has
(d) Enforcement periods. This rule is revised the regulation and submitted the II. Summary of SIP Revision
effective from 3:00 p.m. on December table of VOC content limits for fiberglass On November 15, 2013, the
28, 2015 through 11:59 p.m. on January boat manufacturing materials to EPA in Pennsylvania Department of
22, 2016, or until waters recede and order to address specific RACT Environmental Protection (PADEP)
conditions allow for safe navigation, requirements for Allegheny County. submitted to EPA on behalf of ACHD a
whichever occurs first. Therefore, EPA is converting the SIP revision concerning the adoption of
conditional approval of the revisions to the EPA CTGs for miscellaneous metal
(e) Informational broadcasts. The the Pennsylvania SIP to a full approval and/or plastic parts surface coating
COTP or a designated representative in accordance with the requirements of processes, automobile and light-duty
will inform the public through the Clean Air Act (CAA). truck assembly coatings, miscellaneous
broadcasts notice to mariners of the DATES: This final rule is effective on industrial adhesives, and fiberglass boat
enforcement period for the emergency February 19, 2016. manufacturing materials in Allegheny
safety zones as well as any changes in ADDRESSES: EPA has established a County. These ACHD regulations, with
the dates and times of enforcement. docket for this action under Docket ID a state effective date of June 8, 2013, are
Dated: December 28, 2015. Number EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0475. All contained in the ACHD Rules and
R.S. Rhodes, documents in the docket are listed in Regulations, Article XXI, Air Pollution
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Alternate
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Control sections 2105.83 (Control of
Although listed in the electronic docket, VOC Emissions from Miscellaneous
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES

Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2016–01017 Filed 1–19–16; 8:45 am]
some information is not publicly Metal and/or Plastic Parts Surface
available, i.e., confidential business Coating Processes), 2105.84 (Control of
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
information (CBI) or other information VOC Emissions from Automobile and
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings),
Certain other material, such as 2105.85 (Control of VOC Emissions from
copyrighted material, is not placed on Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives),

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:15 Jan 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM 20JAR1

Document Created: 2016-01-19 23:44:05
Document Modified: 2016-01-19 23:44:05

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from January 20, 2016 until 11:59 p.m. on January 22, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 3:00 p.m. on December 28, 2015 until January 20, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 2989
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 2989 - Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River, MO and IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 12 (January 20, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard