81 FR 30503 - Safety Zone; Annual Roy Webster Cross-Channel Swim, Columbia River, Hood River, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 95 (May 17, 2016)

Page Range		30503-30505
FR Document		2016-11515

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the Columbia River in Hood River, OR. This action is necessary to help ensure the safety of the maritime public during a cross-channel swimming event and would do so by prohibiting unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30503-30505]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0370]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Annual Roy Webster Cross-Channel Swim, Columbia 
River, Hood River, OR

AGENCY:  Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the 
Columbia River in Hood River, OR. This action is necessary to help 
ensure the safety of the maritime public during a cross-channel 
swimming event and would do so by prohibiting unauthorized persons and 
vessels from entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Sector 
Columbia River Captain of the Port or a designated representative. We 
invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before June 16, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0370 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Ken Lawrenson, Waterways Management 
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-
9319, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    The Roy Webster Cross-Channel Swim is an annual event that has been 
occuring for the last 74 years on the Columbia River in the vicinity of 
Hood River, OR. Registered participants attend the event on Labor Day 
each year and are ferried across the Columbia River from the Hood River 
Marina to the Washington shore to start the event. From there the 
swimmers jump off the ferry and swim back across the river, following a 
swim lane that is lined with volunteers in sailboats, kayaks and 
paddleboards. Approximately 300 swimmers participate in this event 
annually.
    The Captain of the Port, Columbia River (COTP) has determined that 
potential hazards associated with cross-channel swims could be a safety 
concern for the event participants, any other mariners transiting the 
area during the event hours, and a potential threat to the marine 
environment.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of event 
participants, the marine environment and the protection of the 
navigable waterway during the scheduled event. The Coast

[[Page 30504]]

Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone on Labor Day of each 
year between 6 a.m. and noon. As the event consists of swimmers 
crossing the navigable channel, the Coast Guard feels that it would be 
necessary to establish a safety zone that would cover all waters of the 
Columbia River between river mile 169 and river mile 170. Vessels 
needing to transit through the safety zone during the event would be 
permitted to enter the safety zone only by obtaining permission from 
the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text the Coast 
Guard is proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management 
and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, short duration, and the event's long history. Commercial 
vessel traffic would be able to transit the area with permission from 
the COTP or a designated representative. Moreover, the Coast Guard 
would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 
about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to 
enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety 
zone lasting approximately six hours that would prohibit entry within a 
specified section of the Columbia River in the vicinity of Hood River, 
OR. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further 
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist and 
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

[[Page 30505]]

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.1342 to read as follows:


Sec. 165.1342  Annual Roy Webster Cross-Channel Swim, Columbia River, 
Hood River, OR.

    (a) Regulated area. The following regulated area is a safety zone. 
The safety zone will encompass all waters of the Columbia River between 
River Mile 169 and River Mile 170.
    (b) Definition. As used in this section--
    Designated representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, 
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers 
operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers 
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia 
River in the enforcement of the regulated area.
    Non-participant person means a person not registered as a swimmer 
in the Roy Webster Cross-Channel Swim held on the Columbia River in the 
vicinity of Hood River, OR, each Labor Day.
    (c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33 
CFR part 165, subpart C, non-participant persons and vessels are 
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or 
remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by Captain of the 
Port Sector Columbia River or a designated representative.
    (1) Non-participant persons and vessels may request authorization 
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated 
area by contacting the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a 
designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If authorization 
is granted by the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a 
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such 
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the 
Port Sector Columbia River or a designated representative.
    (2) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the safety zone by Local 
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and on-scene 
designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement period. This safety zone will be enforced on Labor 
Day of each year, between the hours of 6 a.m. and Noon.

    Dated: May 9, 2016.
D.F. Berliner,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia 
River.
[FR Doc. 2016-11515 Filed 5-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

30504 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules

Guard proposes this rulemaking under that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the
The COTP proposes to establish a The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes.
safety zone on Labor Day of each year 605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has
between 6 a.m. and noon. As the event have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian
consists of swimmers crossing the a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed
navigable channel, the Coast Guard feels While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
that it would be necessary to establish vessels intending to transit the safety CONTACT section.
a safety zone that would cover all waters zone may be small entities, for the
of the Columbia River between river reasons stated in section IV.A above this E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
mile 169 and river mile 170. Vessels proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
needing to transit through the safety significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
zone during the event would be vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of
permitted to enter the safety zone only If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
by obtaining permission from the COTP organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
or a designated representative. The jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a
regulatory text the Coast Guard is and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
proposing appears at the end of this significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of
document. please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this
IV. Regulatory Analyses qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such
We developed this proposed rule after this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the
considering numerous statutes and Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble.
Below we summarize our analyses Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), F. Environment
based on a number of these statutes and we want to assist small entities in
Executive orders and we discuss First understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule
Amendment rights of protestors. rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland
organization, or governmental Security Management Directive 023–01
A. Regulatory Planning and Review and Commandant Instruction
jurisdiction and you have questions
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 concerning its provisions or options for M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
direct agencies to assess the costs and compliance, please contact the person Guard in complying with the National
benefits of available regulatory listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
alternatives and, if regulation is CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
necessary, to select regulatory not retaliate against small entities that preliminary determination that this
approaches that maximize net benefits. question or complain about this action is one of a category of actions that
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the proposed rule or any policy or action of do not individually or cumulatively
importance of quantifying both costs the Coast Guard. have a significant effect on the human
and benefits, of reducing costs, of environment. This proposed rule
harmonizing rules, and of promoting C. Collection of Information involves a safety zone lasting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been This proposed rule would not call for approximately six hours that would
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory a new collection of information under prohibit entry within a specified section
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 of the Columbia River in the vicinity of
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). Hood River, OR. Normally such actions
reviewed by the Office of Management are categorically excluded from further
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination Governments 2–1 of Commandant Instruction
is based on the size, location, short A rule has implications for federalism M16475.lD. A preliminary
duration, and the event’s long history. under Executive Order 13132, environmental analysis checklist and
Commercial vessel traffic would be able Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Categorical Exclusion Determination are
to transit the area with permission from effect on the States, on the relationship available in the docket where indicated
the COTP or a designated between the national government and under ADDRESSES. We seek any
representative. Moreover, the Coast the States, or on the distribution of comments or information that may lead
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to power and responsibilities among the to the discovery of a significant
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel various levels of government. We have environmental impact from this
16 about the zone, and the rule would analyzed this proposed rule under that proposed rule.
allow vessels to seek permission to enter Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental G. Protest Activities
the zone.
federalism principles and preemption The Coast Guard respects the First
B. Impact on Small Entities requirements described in Executive Amendment rights of protesters.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Order 13132. Protesters are asked to contact the
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have person listed in the FOR FURTHER
requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive INFORMATION CONTACT section to
the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and coordinate protest activities so that your
small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal message can be received without
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have jeopardizing the safety or security of
businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or people, places, or vessels.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:05 May 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM 17MYP1

Document Created: 2018-02-07 15:05:36
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 15:05:36

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 16, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Ken Lawrenson, Waterways Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240- 9319, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 30503
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 30503 - Safety Zone; Annual Roy Webster Cross-Channel Swim, Columbia River, Hood River, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 95 (May 17, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard