81 FR 31883 - Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, Lawrenceburg, IN

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 98 (May 20, 2016)

Page Range		31883-31884
FR Document		2016-11823

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local regulation for all waters of the Ohio River, surface to bottom, extending from Ohio River mile 492.0 to 495.5 at Lawrenceburg, IN, June 18, 2016 with an alternate date of June 19, 2016. This special local regulation is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Lawrenceburg, IN, during a high-speed boat race on June 18, 2016. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 98 (Friday, May 20, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31883-31884]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11823]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0158]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, Lawrenceburg, IN

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local 
regulation for all waters of the Ohio River, surface to bottom, 
extending from Ohio River mile 492.0 to 495.5 at Lawrenceburg, IN, June 
18, 2016 with an alternate date of June 19, 2016. This special local 
regulation is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these 
navigable waters near Lawrenceburg, IN, during a high-speed boat race 
on June 18, 2016. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and 
vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated representative. We 
invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before June 6, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0158 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer Andrew Prescott, 
Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 502-779-5334, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On January 29, 2016, the Breakwater Powerboat Association notified 
the Coast Guard that it will be sponsoring a high-speed boat race from 
7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on June 18, 2016. Alternate time and date will 
be from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. June 19, 2016. The boat race will take 
place at Ohio River mile 492.0 to 495.5 in the vicinity of 
Lawrenceburg, IN. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley (COTP) has 
determined that potential hazards associated with a high- speed regatta 
would be a safety concern for anyone within in the regulated area.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels, 
spectators and the navigable waters within the regulated area before, 
during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this 
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a special local regulation from 7:30 
a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on June 18, 2016. The special local regulation would 
cover all navigable waters of the Ohio River from mile 492.0 to 495.5 
in Lawrenceburg, IN. The duration of the regulated area is intended to 
ensure the safety of vessels, spectators and these navigable waters 
before, during, and after the scheduled high-speed regatta. No vessel 
or person would be permitted to enter the regulated area without 
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The 
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize 
our analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not 
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the special local regulation. 
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the regulated area, and the rule 
would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the regulated area.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

[[Page 31884]]

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321- 4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a special 
local regulation lasting less than 12 hours that would prohibit entry 
within the regulated area. Normally such actions are categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of 
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis 
checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the 
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C 1233.

0
2. Add temporary Sec.  100.35T08-0158 to read as follows:


Sec.  100.35T08-0158  Special Local Regulation; Ohio River Mile 492.0 
to 495.5, Lawrenceburg, IN.

    (a) Location. All waters of the Ohio River beginning at mile marker 
492.0 and ending at mile marker 495.5 at Lawrenceburg, IN.
    (b) Periods of Enforcement. This rule will be enforced from 7:30 
a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on June 18, 2016, unless the event is delayed due to 
weather. If delayed, it will be enforced from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. 
June 19, 2016. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated 
representative will inform the public through broadcast notice to 
mariners of the enforcement period for the special local regulation.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  100.801 of this part, entry into this area is prohibited unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated 
representative.
    (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the 
area must request permission from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley 
or a designated representative. U. S. Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley 
may be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or at 1-800-253-7465.

    Dated: April 29, 2016.
R.V. Timme,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2016-11823 Filed 5-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules 31883

approved in part, or not approved. At Andrew Prescott, Sector Ohio Valley, regulation is necessary, to select
that time, we will also make the U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 502–779– regulatory approaches that maximize
determinations and certifications 5334, email Andrew.J.Prescott@uscg.mil. net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
required by the various laws and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: importance of quantifying both costs
executive orders governing the and benefits, of reducing costs, of
rulemaking process and include them in I. Table of Abbreviations harmonizing rules, and of promoting
the final rule. CFR Code of Federal Regulations flexibility. This NPRM has not been
DHS Department of Homeland Security designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 901 E.O. Executive order action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
Intergovernmental relations, Surface FR Federal Register the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
mining, Underground mining. NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Office of Management and Budget.
U.S.C. United States Code This regulatory action determination
Dated: April 7, 2016.
Ervin J. Barchenger, II. Background, Purpose, and Legal is based on the size, location, duration,
Basis and time-of-day of the special local
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
regulation. Moreover, the Coast Guard
[FR Doc. 2016–11246 Filed 5–19–16; 8:45 am] On January 29, 2016, the Breakwater would issue a Broadcast Notice to
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P Powerboat Association notified the Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
Coast Guard that it will be sponsoring 16 about the regulated area, and the rule
a high-speed boat race from 7:30 a.m. to would allow vessels to seek permission
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 6:30 p.m. on June 18, 2016. Alternate to enter the regulated area.
SECURITY time and date will be from 10:00 a.m.
to 2:00 p.m. June 19, 2016. The boat race B. Impact on Small Entities
Coast Guard will take place at Ohio River mile 492.0 The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
to 495.5 in the vicinity of Lawrenceburg, 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
33 CFR Part 100 IN. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley requires Federal agencies to consider
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0158] (COTP) has determined that potential the potential impact of regulations on
hazards associated with a high- speed small entities during rulemaking. The
RIN 1625–AA08 regatta would be a safety concern for term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
anyone within in the regulated area. businesses, not-for-profit organizations
Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, The purpose of this rulemaking is to that are independently owned and
Lawrenceburg, IN ensure the safety of vessels, spectators operated and are not dominant in their
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. and the navigable waters within the fields, and governmental jurisdictions
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. regulated area before, during, and after with populations of less than 50,000.
the scheduled event. The Coast Guard The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to proposes this rulemaking under 605(b) that this proposed rule would not
establish a special local regulation for authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. have a significant economic impact on
all waters of the Ohio River, surface to a substantial number of small entities.
bottom, extending from Ohio River mile III. Discussion of Proposed Rule While some owners or operators of
492.0 to 495.5 at Lawrenceburg, IN, June The COTP proposes to establish a vessels intending to transit the regulated
18, 2016 with an alternate date of June special local regulation from 7:30 a.m. area may be small entities, for the
19, 2016. This special local regulation is to 6:30 p.m. on June 18, 2016. The reasons stated in section IV.A above this
necessary to provide for the safety of life special local regulation would cover all proposed rule would not have a
on these navigable waters near navigable waters of the Ohio River from significant economic impact on any
Lawrenceburg, IN, during a high-speed mile 492.0 to 495.5 in Lawrenceburg, vessel owner or operator.
boat race on June 18, 2016. This IN. The duration of the regulated area is If you think that your business,
proposed rulemaking would prohibit intended to ensure the safety of vessels, organization, or governmental
persons and vessels from being in the spectators and these navigable waters jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
regulated area unless authorized by the before, during, and after the scheduled and that this rule would have a
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a high-speed regatta. No vessel or person significant economic impact on it,
designated representative. We invite would be permitted to enter the please submit a comment (see
your comments on this proposed regulated area without obtaining ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
rulemaking. permission from the COTP or a qualifies and how and to what degree
designated representative. The this rule would economically affect it.
DATES: Comments and related material
regulatory text we are proposing appears Under section 213(a) of the Small
must be received by the Coast Guard on
at the end of this document. Business Regulatory Enforcement
or before June 6, 2016.
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments IV. Regulatory Analyses we want to assist small entities in
identified by docket number USCG– We developed this proposed rule after understanding this proposed rule. If the
2016–0158 using the Federal considering numerous statutes and rule would affect your small business,
eRulemaking Portal at http:// executive orders (E.O.s) related to organization, or governmental
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public rulemaking. Below we summarize our jurisdiction and you have questions
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS

Participation and Request for analyses based on a number of these concerning its provisions or options for
Comments’’ portion of the statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First compliance, please contact the person
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Amendment rights of protestors.
further instructions on submitting CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
comments. A. Regulatory Planning and Review not retaliate against small entities that
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies question or complain about this
you have questions about this proposed to assess the costs and benefits of proposed rule or any policy or action of
rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer available regulatory alternatives and, if the Coast Guard.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 May 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20MYP1.SGM 20MYP1

Document Created: 2016-05-20 01:59:37
Document Modified: 2016-05-20 01:59:37

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 6, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer Andrew Prescott, Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 502-779-5334, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 31883
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways

81 FR 31883 - Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, Lawrenceburg, IN

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 98 (May 20, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard