81 FR 32306 - Applications for New Awards; Teacher Quality Partnership Grant Program
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 99 (May 23, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 99 (May 23, 2016)
| Page Range | 32306-32319 | |
| FR Document | 2016-12101 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 32306-32319] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-12101] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Applications for New Awards; Teacher Quality Partnership Grant Program AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Overview Information: Teacher Quality Partnership Grant Program. Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2016. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.336S. DATES: Applications Available: May 23, 2016. Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: June 22, 2016. Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 7, 2016. Date of Pre-Application Webinars: The Office of Innovation and Improvement intends to hold Webinars designed to provide technical assistance to interested applicants for grants under the Teacher Quality Partnership (TQP) Grant Program. Details regarding the dates and times of these Webinars will be provided on the TQP Web site at http://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/teacher-quality/teacher-quality-partnership/applicant-info-and-eligibility/. Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 20, 2016. Full Text of Announcement I. Funding Opportunity Description Purpose of Program: The TQP Grant Program aims to increase student achievement by improving the quality of new teachers and prospective teachers [[Page 32307]] through enhanced preparation of prospective teachers and professional development activities for new teachers; holding teacher preparation programs at institutions of higher education (IHEs) accountable for preparing teachers who meet applicable State certification and licensure requirements; and recruiting individuals with strong content knowledge or a record of professional accomplishment, including minorities and individuals from occupations other than education, into the teaching force. Background: The TQP Grant Program supports partnerships among (i) IHEs, (ii) high-need local educational agencies (LEAs), and (iii) high- need schools served by such LEAs or high-need early childhood education (ECE) programs. Under section 202(d) and (e) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), these partnerships must implement either (a) teacher preparation programs at the pre-baccalaureate or ``fifth- year'' level that include specific reforms in IHEs' existing teacher preparation programs and follow-up support for program completers who become teachers in partner LEAs, or (b) teacher residency programs in which individuals with strong academic or professional backgrounds but without teaching experience are teaching in high-need schools with support from mentor teachers, and concurrently enrolled in a Master's degree program. These two options are further explained in this notice under the Absolute Priorities section of this notice. In the FY 2016 TQP competition, we are especially interested in supporting TQP projects that serve or are designed to serve tribal communities and rural areas, given the need for effective educators serving these communities. On November 5, 2009, pursuant to Executive Order 13175, President Obama issued a memorandum requiring each Federal agency to prepare a detailed plan of action the agency would take to consult with tribal officials when developing policies that have implications for tribal communities. Consistent with its responsibilities under the President's memorandum, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) conducted two consultation sessions by teleconference with tribal officials about the TQP program, on January 19 and 21, 2016. During these consultations, we provided participants with an overview of the TQP program and the current TQP grantees, and facilitated a discussion around potential opportunities and challenges that this grant program may provide for tribal communities. In addition, the Department solicited feedback and questions from tribal communities over a two-week period following the calls. During this outreach, the Department received numerous comments and questions from participants. Some of these concerns were of a general nature and could affect all applicants, regardless of whether or not they serve Tribal communities. For example, participants were concerned about forming the necessary eligible partnership needed to apply, what entity should lead that effort, and what entity should serve as the lead applicant for the eligible partnership. Participants also expressed concern about whether their local LEAs or BIE-funded schools would meet the definition of a high-need LEA, as that term is defined in section 200 of HEA. Some concerns raised by participants reflected the unique challenges facing tribal communities. For example, participants raised issues related to the status of Bureau of Indian Education-funded schools (e.g., whether they are LEAs) in many tribal communities, and the role of two-year colleges in preparing and producing teachers to serve those communities. In addition, TQP staff learned that members of the Tribal community are widely familiar with the Indian Education Professional Development Grant program in the Department's Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, and sought additional information about the differences between that program and the TQP program. Answers to these and other questions will be addressed in the upcoming TQP pre-application Webinars. Additionally, responses to questions and concerns addressed during the consultations also can be found in this notice inviting applications, and in the TQP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document found at http://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/teacher-quality/teacher-quality-partnership/. The Department has also prepared a document that outlines the difference between the TQP and PDP programs. This document can be found as part of the TQP FAQ document. We appreciate the dialogue with tribal leaders and the opportunity to gain insight into tribal communities. Due to the detailed statutory requirements for the TQP program in sections 200-204 of the HEA, the Department has limited flexibility to address all of the concerns raised during our consultation process. The consultations nevertheless confirmed that rural communities and tribal communities could greatly benefit from the TQP program, and therefore we have decided to encourage applications from rural and tribal communities through adoption of a competitive preference priority and an invitational priority that focus on the specific teaching needs of these communities. Priorities: This notice contains two absolute priorities, one competitive preference priority, and one invitational priority. In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), Absolute Priority 1 is from section 202(d) of the HEA, and Absolute Priority 2 is from section 202(e) of the HEA. The competitive preference priority is from the Department's notice of final supplemental priorities and definitions for discretionary grant programs, published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2014 (79 FR 73425) (Supplemental Priorities). Absolute Priorities: For FY 2016 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this competition, these priorities are absolute priorities. All applications must address either Absolute Priority 1 or Absolute Priority 2 in order to be considered for funding, but not both. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that meet Absolute Priority 1 or Absolute Priority 2. Applications that address both absolute priorities will not be reviewed. Each of the two absolute priorities constitutes its own funding category. Assuming that applications in each funding category are of sufficient quality, the Secretary intends to award grants under each absolute priority. Applications will be peer reviewed and scored based on the TQP program's selection criteria. Applications will be scored and placed in rank order by absolute priority; thus, applications that address each priority will be scored and ranked separately to create two funding slates. Applications that do not clearly identify the priority being addressed will not be reviewed. These priorities are from section 202(d) and (e) of the HEA, and are: Absolute Priority 1: Partnership Grants for the Preparation of Teachers. Under this priority, an eligible partnership must carry out an effective pre-baccalaureate teacher preparation program or a fifth-year initial licensing program that includes all of the following: (a) Program Accountability. Implementing reforms, described in paragraph (b) of this priority, within each teacher preparation program and, as applicable, each preparation program for early childhood education (ECE) programs, of the eligible partnership that is assisted under this priority, to hold each program accountable for-- (1) Preparing-- [[Page 32308]] (i) New or prospective teachers to meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), (including teachers in rural school districts, special educators, and teachers of students who are limited English proficient); (ii) Such teachers and, as applicable, early childhood educators, to understand empirically-based practice and scientifically valid research related to teaching and learning and the applicability of such practice and research, including through the effective use of technology, instructional techniques, and strategies consistent with the principles of universal design for learning, and through positive behavioral interventions and support strategies to improve student achievement; and (iii) As applicable, early childhood educators to be highly competent; and (2) Promoting strong teaching skills and, as applicable, techniques for early childhood educators to improve children's cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development. Note: In addressing paragraph (a) of this priority, applicants may either discuss their implementation of reforms within all teacher preparation programs that the partner institution of higher education administers and that would be assisted under this TQP grant, or selected teacher preparation programs that need particular assistance and that would receive the TQP grant funding. (b) Required reforms. The reforms described in paragraph (a) shall include-- (1) Implementing teacher preparation program curriculum changes that improve, evaluate, and assess how well all prospective and new teachers develop teaching skills; (2) Using empirically-based practice and scientifically valid research, where applicable, about teaching and learning so that all prospective teachers and, as applicable, early childhood educators-- (i) Understand and can implement research-based teaching practices in classroom instruction; (ii) Have knowledge of student learning methods; (iii) Possess skills to analyze student academic achievement data and other measures of student learning and use such data and measures to improve classroom instruction; (iv) Possess teaching skills and an understanding of effective instructional strategies across all applicable content areas that enable general education and special education teachers and early childhood educators to-- (A) Meet the specific learning needs of all students, including students with disabilities, students who are limited English proficient, students who are gifted and talented, students with low literacy levels, and, as applicable, children in ECE programs; and (B) Differentiate instruction for such students; (v) Can effectively participate as a member of the individualized education program team, as defined in section 614(d)(1)(B) of the IDEA; and (vi) Can successfully employ effective strategies for reading instruction using the essential components of reading instruction; (3) Ensuring collaboration with departments, programs, or units of a partner institution outside of the teacher preparation program in all academic content areas to ensure that prospective teachers receive training in both teaching and relevant content areas in order to meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA, which may include training in multiple subjects to teach multiple grade levels as may be needed for individuals preparing to teach in rural communities and for individuals preparing to teach students with disabilities; (4) Developing and implementing an induction program; (5) Developing admissions goals and priorities aligned with the hiring objectives of the high-need LEA in the eligible partnership; and (6) Implementing program and curriculum changes, as applicable, to ensure that prospective teachers have the requisite content knowledge, preparation, and degree to teach Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate courses successfully. (c) Clinical experience and interaction. Developing and improving a sustained and high-quality preservice clinical education program to further develop the teaching skills of all prospective teachers and, as applicable, early childhood educators involved in the program. Such programs shall do the following-- (1) Incorporate year-long opportunities for enrichment, including-- (i) Clinical learning in classrooms in high-need schools served by the high-need LEA in the eligible partnership, and identified by the eligible partnership; and (ii) Closely supervised interaction between prospective teachers and faculty, experienced teachers, principals, other administrators, and school leaders at ECE programs (as applicable), elementary schools, or secondary schools, and providing support for such interaction; (2) Integrate pedagogy and classroom practice and promote effective teaching skills in academic content areas; (3) Provide high-quality teacher mentoring; (4) Be offered over the course of a program of teacher preparation; (5) Be tightly aligned with course work (and may be developed as a fifth-year of a teacher preparation program); (6) Where feasible, allow prospective teachers to learn to teach in the same LEA in which the teachers will work, learning the instructional initiatives and curriculum of that LEA; (7) As applicable, provide training and experience to enhance the teaching skills of prospective teachers to better prepare such teachers to meet the unique needs of teaching in rural or urban communities; and (8) Provide support and training for individuals participating in an activity for prospective or new teachers described in this paragraph, or paragraphs (a) and (b), or (d), and for individuals who serve as mentors for such teachers, based on each individual's experience. Such support may include-- (i) With respect to a prospective teacher or a mentor, release time for such individual's participation; (ii) With respect to a faculty member, receiving course workload credit and compensation for time teaching in the eligible partnership's activities; and (iii) With respect to a mentor, a stipend, which may include bonus, differential, incentive, or performance pay, based on the mentor's extra skills and responsibilities. (d) Induction programs for new teachers. Creating an induction program for new teachers or, in the case of an ECE program, providing mentoring or coaching for new early childhood educators. (e) Support and training for participants in ECE programs. In the case of an eligible partnership focusing on early childhood educator preparation, implementing initiatives that increase compensation for early childhood educators who attain associate or baccalaureate degrees in ECE. (f) Teacher recruitment. Developing and implementing effective mechanisms [[Page 32309]] (which may include alternative routes to State certification of teachers) to ensure that the eligible partnership is able to recruit qualified individuals to become teachers who meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA through the activities of the eligible partnership, which may include an emphasis on recruiting into the teaching profession-- (1) Individuals from underrepresented populations; (2) Individuals to teach in rural communities and teacher shortage areas, including mathematics, science, special education, and the instruction of limited English proficient students; and (3) Mid-career professionals from other occupations, former military personnel, and recent college graduates with a record of academic distinction. (g) Literacy training. Strengthening the literacy teaching skills of prospective and, as applicable, new elementary school and secondary school teachers-- (1) To implement literacy programs that incorporate the essential components of reading instruction; (2) To use screening, diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments to determine students' literacy levels, difficulties, and growth in order to improve classroom instruction and improve student reading and writing skills; (3) To provide individualized, intensive, and targeted literacy instruction for students with deficiencies in literacy skills; and (4) To integrate literacy skills in the classroom across subject areas. Absolute Priority 2: Partnership Grants for the Establishment of Effective Teaching Residency Programs. Under this priority, an eligible partnership must carry out an effective teaching residency program that includes all of the following activities: (a) Supporting a teaching residency program described in paragraph II (a) for high-need subjects and areas, as determined by the needs of the high-need LEA in the partnership; (b) Placing graduates of the teaching residency program in cohorts that facilitate professional collaboration, both among graduates of the teaching residency program and between such graduates and mentor teachers in the receiving school; (c) Ensuring that teaching residents who participate in the teaching residency program receive-- (1) Effective pre-service preparation as described in paragraph II; (2) Teacher mentoring; (3) Support required through the induction program as the teaching residents enter the classroom as new teachers; and (4) The preparation described in paragraphs (c)(1), (2), and (3) of Absolute Priority 2. II. Teaching Residency Programs. (a) Establishment and design. A teaching residency program under this priority is a program based upon models of successful teaching residencies that serves as a mechanism to prepare teachers for success in the high-need schools in the eligible partnership, and must be designed to include the following characteristics of successful programs: (1) The integration of pedagogy, classroom practice, and teacher mentoring; (2) Engagement of teaching residents in rigorous graduate-level course work leading to a master's degree while undertaking a guided teaching apprenticeship; (3) Experience and learning opportunities alongside a trained and experienced mentor teacher-- (i) Whose teaching shall complement the residency program so that classroom clinical practice is tightly aligned with coursework; (ii) Who shall have extra responsibilities as a teacher leader of the teaching residency program, as a mentor for residents, and as a teacher coach during the induction program for new teachers; and for establishing, within the program, a learning community in which all individuals are expected to continually improve their capacity to advance student learning; and (iii) Who may be relieved from teaching duties as a result of such additional responsibilities; (4) The establishment of clear criteria for the selection of mentor teachers based on measures of teacher effectiveness and the appropriate subject area knowledge. Evaluation of teacher effectiveness must be based on, but not limited to, observations of the following-- (i) Planning and preparation, including demonstrated knowledge of content, pedagogy, and assessment, including the use of formative and diagnostic assessments to improve student learning; (ii) Appropriate instruction that engages students with different learning styles; (iii) Collaboration with colleagues to improve instruction; (iv) Analysis of gains in student learning, based on multiple measures that are valid and reliable and that, when feasible, may include valid, reliable, and objective measures of the influence of teachers on the rate of student academic progress; and (v) In the case of mentor candidates who will be mentoring new or prospective literacy and mathematics coaches or instructors, appropriate skills in the essential components of reading instruction, teacher training in literacy instructional strategies across core subject areas, and teacher training in mathematics instructional strategies, as appropriate; (5) Grouping of teaching residents in cohorts to facilitate professional collaboration among such residents; (6) The development of admissions goals and priorities-- (i) That are aligned with the hiring objectives of the LEA partnering with the program, as well as the instructional initiatives and curriculum of such agency, in exchange for a commitment by such agency to hire qualified graduates from the teaching residency program; and (ii) Which may include consideration of applicants that reflect the communities in which they will teach as well as consideration of individuals from underrepresented populations in the teaching profession; and (7) Support for residents, once the teaching residents are hired as teachers of record, through an induction program, professional development, and networking opportunities to support the residents through not less than the residents' first two years of teaching. (b) Selection of individuals as teacher residents. (1) Eligible Individual. In order to be eligible to be a teacher resident in a teaching residency program under this priority, an individual shall-- (i) Be a recent graduate of a four-year IHE or a mid-career professional from outside the field of education possessing strong content knowledge or a record of professional accomplishment; and (ii) Submit an application to the teaching residency program. (2) Selection Criteria. An eligible partnership carrying out a teaching residency program under this priority shall establish criteria for the selection of eligible individuals to participate in the teaching residency program based on the following characteristics-- (i) Strong content knowledge or record of accomplishment in the field or subject area to be taught; [[Page 32310]] (ii) Strong verbal and written communication skills, which may be demonstrated by performance on appropriate tests; and (iii) Other attributes linked to effective teaching, which may be determined by interviews or performance assessments, as specified by the eligible partnership. (c) Stipends or salaries; applications; agreements; repayments. (1) Stipends or salaries. A teaching residency program under this priority shall provide a one-year living stipend or salary to teaching residents during the teaching residency program; (2) Applications for stipends or salaries. Each teacher residency candidate desiring a stipend or salary during the period of residency shall submit an application to the eligible partnership at such time, and containing such information and assurances, as the eligible partnership may require; (3) Agreements to serve. Each application submitted under paragraph (c)(2) of this priority shall contain or be accompanied by an agreement that the applicant will-- (i) Serve as a full-time teacher for a total of not less than three academic years immediately after successfully completing the teaching residency program; (ii) Fulfill the requirement under paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this priority by teaching in a high-need school served by the high-need LEA in the eligible partnership and teach a subject or area that is designated as high-need by the partnership; (iii) Provide to the eligible partnership a certificate, from the chief administrative officer of the LEA in which the resident is employed, of the employment required under paragraph (c)(3)(i) and (ii) of this priority at the beginning of, and upon completion of, each year or partial year of service; (iv) Meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA, when the applicant begins to fulfill the service obligation under this clause; and (v) Comply with the requirements set by the eligible partnership under paragraph (e) of this priority if the applicant is unable or unwilling to complete the service obligation required by the paragraph. (d) Repayments. (1) In general. A grantee carrying out a teaching residency program under this priority shall require a recipient of a stipend or salary under paragraph (c)(1) of this priority who does not complete, or who notifies the partnership that the recipient intends not to complete, the service obligation required by paragraph (c)(3) of this priority to repay such stipend or salary to the eligible partnership, together with interest, at a rate specified by the partnership in the agreement, and in accordance with such other terms and conditions specified by the eligible partnership, as necessary; (2) Other terms and conditions. Any other terms and conditions specified by the eligible partnership may include reasonable provisions for pro rata repayment of the stipend or salary described in paragraph (c)(1) of this priority or for deferral of a teaching resident's service obligation required by paragraph (c)(3) of this priority, on grounds of health, incapacitation, inability to secure employment in a school served by the eligible partnership, being called to active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States, or other extraordinary circumstances; (3) Use of repayments. An eligible partnership shall use any repayment received under paragraph (d) to carry out additional activities that are consistent with the purposes of this priority. Competitive Preference Priority: For FY 2016 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, this priority is a competitive preference priority. The priority comes from the Secretary's Supplemental Priorities and Definitions for Discretionary Grant Programs (Secretary's Supplemental Priorities) published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2014 at 79 FR 73426, 73451. If an applicant chooses to address the competitive preference priority, the project narrative section of its application must identify its response to this competitive preference priority. The Department will not review or award points under this competitive preference priority if the applicant fails to clearly identify its response in its application. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to an additional fifteen points to an application, depending on how well the application addresses the competitive preference priority. An applicant is not required to address both paragraphs (a) and (b) of the competitive preference priority in order to receive the full 15 points. Only applicants that are highly rated on the selection criteria for Absolute Priority 1 or Absolute Priority 2 will be eligible to receive competitive preference points. The priority is: Competitive Preference Priority: Supporting High-Need Students (up to 15 points). Projects that are designed to improve academic outcomes for one or both of the following groups of students: (a) Students who are members of federally-recognized Indian Tribes. (b) Students served by rural LEAs (as defined in this notice). Within this competitive preference priority, we are particularly interested in applications that address the following invitational priority. Invitational Priority: Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we do not give an application that meets this invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over other applications. This priority is: Enhancing Cultural Competencies to Support High-Need Students. (a) Under this priority, the Department invites applicants to propose a TQP project that will provide project participants with specific coursework, experiences, and professional development to enable them to gain cultural competencies and content knowledge, and related pedagogical skills, to support the learning needs of American Indian and Alaska Native students, rural students, or both. (b) In responding to this invitational priority, applicants are encouraged to include the following elements in their proposed projects: (1) An identification of the proposed population(s) to be served in the partner high-need LEA(s), including data that document a high number or high concentration of American Indian and Alaska Native and/ or rural students to be served, as well as data regarding how the project will address the unique challenges of serving the identified population(s). (2) A description of how the project will promote collaboration across partner institutions of higher education to ensure that TQP project participants who intend to teach American Indian and Alaska Native and/or rural students have access to coursework, experiences, and professional development that will build both cultural competency and content knowledge to teach students in the identified population(s) effectively. (3) A description of how the grantee will align its proposed TQP project activities with the appropriate State licensure standards and, how it will implement strategies that translate those standards into classroom practice with regard to the identified population(s). [[Page 32311]] Definitions: The definitions for ``Early childhood educator,'' ``High-need early childhood education (ECE) program,'' ``High-need local educational agency (LEA)'', ``High-need school,'' and ``Partner institution'' are from section 200 of the HEA. The definitions for ``Logic model,'' ``Relevant outcome,'' and ``Strong theory'' are from 34 CFR 77.1. The definitions for ``high minority school,'' ``high-need students,'' ``regular high school diploma,'' and ``rural local education agency'' are from the Secretary's Supplemental Priorities. Early childhood educator means an individual with primary responsibility for the education of children in an early childhood education program. High-minority school means a school as that term is defined by a local educational agency (LEA), which must define the term in a manner consistent with its State's Teacher Equity Plan, as required by section 1111(b)(8)(C) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). The applicant must provide the definition(s) of High- minority Schools used in its application. High-need early childhood education (ECE) program means an ECE program serving children from low-income families that is located within the geographic area served by a high-need LEA. High-need local educational agency (LEA) means an LEA-- (i)(A) For which not less than 20 percent of the children served by the agency are children from low-income families; (B) That serves not fewer than 10,000 children from low-income families; (C) That meets the eligibility requirements for funding under the Small, Rural School Achievement (SRSA) Program under section 5211(b) of the ESEA; or (D) That meets eligibility requirements for funding under the Rural and Low-Income School (RLIS) Program under section 6211(b) of the ESEA; and-- (ii)(A) For which there is a high percentage of teachers not teaching in the academic subject areas or grade levels in which the teachers were trained to teach; or (B) For which there is a high teacher turnover rate or a high percentage of teachers with emergency, provisional, or temporary certification or licensure. Note: Information on how an applicant may demonstrate that a partner LEA meets this definition is included in the application package. High-need school means a school that, based on the most recent data available, meets one or both of the following: (i) The school is in the highest quartile of schools in a ranking of all schools served by an LEA, ranked in descending order by percentage of students from low-income families enrolled in such schools, as determined by the LEA based on one of the following measures of poverty: (A) The percentage of students aged 5 through 17 in poverty counted in the most recent census data approved by the Secretary. (B) The percentage of students eligible for a free or reduced price school lunch under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act. (C) The percentage of students in families receiving assistance under the State program funded under Part A of Title IV of the Social Security Act. (D) The percentage of students eligible to receive medical assistance under the Medicaid program. (E) A composite of two or more of the measures described in paragraphs (A) through (D). (ii) In the case of-- (A) An elementary school, the school serves students not less than 60 percent of whom are eligible for a free or reduced price school lunch under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act; or (B) Any other school that is not an elementary school, the other school serves students not less than 45 percent of whom are eligible for a free or reduced price school lunch under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act. (iii) The Secretary may, upon approval of an application submitted by an eligible partnership seeking a grant under this title, designate a school that does not qualify as a high-need school under this definition, as a high-need school for the purpose of this title. The Secretary shall base the approval of an application for designation of a school under this clause on a consideration of the information required under section 200 (II)(B)(ii) of the HEA, and may also take into account other information submitted by the eligible partnership. Note: Information on how an applicant may demonstrate that a partner LEA meets this definition is included in the application package. High-need students means students who are at risk of educational failure or otherwise in need of special assistance and support, such as students who are living in poverty, who attend high-minority schools, who are far below grade level, who have left school before receiving a regular high school diploma, who are at risk of not graduating with a diploma on time, who are homeless, who are in foster care, who have been incarcerated, who have disabilities, or who are English learners. Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a well- specified conceptual framework that identifies key components of the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the relationships among the key components and outcomes, theoretically and operationally. Partner institution means an IHE, which may include a two-year IHE offering a dual program with a partner four-year IHE, participating in an eligible partnership that has a teacher preparation program-- (i) Whose graduates exhibit strong performance on State determined qualifying assessments for new teachers through-- (A) Demonstrating that 80 percent or more of the graduates of the program who intend to enter the field of teaching have passed all of the applicable State qualification assessments for new teachers, which shall include an assessment of each prospective teacher's subject matter knowledge in the content area in which the teacher intends to teach; or (B) Being ranked among the highest-performing teacher preparation programs in the State as determined by the State-- (1) Using criteria consistent with the requirements for the State Report Card under section 205(b) of the HEA before the first publication of the report card; and (2) Using the State report card on teacher preparation required under section 205(b), after the first publication of such report card and for every year thereafter; and (ii) That requires-- (A) Each student in the program to meet high academic standards or demonstrate a record of success, as determined by the institution (including prior to entering and being accepted into a program), and participate in intensive clinical experience; (B) Each student in the program preparing to become a teacher who meets the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA; and (C) Each student in the program preparing to become an early childhood educator to meet degree requirements, [[Page 32312]] as established by the State, and become highly competent. Note: For purposes of paragraph (ii)(C) of this definition, the term ``highly competent,'' under section 200(12) of the HEA, when used with respect to an early childhood educator, means an educator-- (a) With specialized education and training in development and education of young children from birth until entry into kindergarten; (b) With-- (i) A baccalaureate degree in an academic major in the arts and sciences; or (ii) An associate's degree in a related educational area; and (c) Who has demonstrated a high level of knowledge and use of content and pedagogy in the relevant areas associated with quality ECE. Regular high school diploma means the standard high school diploma that is awarded to students in the State and that is fully aligned with the State's academic content standards or a higher diploma and does not include a General Education Development (GED) credential, certificate of attendance, or any alternative award. Relevant outcome means the student outcome (or the ultimate outcome if not related to students) the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice is designed to improve, as consistent with the specific goals of a program. Rural local education agency means a local educational agency (LEA) that is eligible under the Small Rural School Achievement (SRSA) program or the Rural and Low-Income School (RLIS) program authorized under Title VI, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). Eligible applicants may determine whether a particular LEA is eligible for these programs by referring to information on the Department's Web site at www2.ed.gov/nclb/freedom/local/reap.html. Strong theory means a rationale for the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice that includes a logic model. Note: Definitions for the following terms that also apply to this program are in section 200 of the HEA: ``arts and sciences,'' ``induction program,'' ``limited English proficient,'' ``professional development,'' ``scientifically valid research,'' and ``teacher mentoring.'' Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021-1022c. Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The Supplemental Priorities (79 FR 73425). Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants except federally-recognized Indian tribes. Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only. II. Award Information Type of Award: Discretionary grants. Estimated Available Funds: $5,000,000. Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2017 from the list of unfunded applications from this competition. Estimated Range of Awards: $500,000-$1,500,000. Estimated Average Size of Awards: $1,000,000 for the first year of the project. Funding for the second, third, fourth, and fifth years is subject to the availability of funds and the approval of continuation awards (see 34 CFR 75.253). Maximum Award: We will not award more than $1,500,000 to any applicant for a budget period of 12 months. Estimated Number of Awards: 3-5. Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice. Project Period: Up to 60 months. III. Eligibility Information 1. Eligible Applicants: An eligible applicant must be an ``eligible partnership'' as defined in section 200(6) of the HEA. The term ``eligible partnership'' means an entity that-- (1) Must include: (i) A high-need LEA; (ii)(A) A high-need school or consortium of high-need schools served by the high-need LEA, or (B) As applicable, a high-need ECE program; (iii) A partner institution; (iv) A school, department, or program of education within such partner institution, which may include an existing teacher professional development program with proven outcomes within a four-year IHE that provides intensive and sustained collaboration between faculty and LEAs consistent with the requirements of title II of the HEA; (v) A school or department of arts and sciences within such partner institution; and (2) May include any of the following-- (i) The Governor of the State. (ii) The State educational agency. (iii) The State board of education. (iv) The State agency for higher education. (v) A business. (vi) A public or private nonprofit educational organization. (vii) An educational service agency. (viii) A teacher organization. (ix) A high-performing LEA, or a consortium of such LEAs, that can serve as a resource to the partnership. (x) A charter school (as defined in section 5210 of the ESEA). (xi) A school or department within the partner institution that focuses on psychology and human development. (xii) A school or department within the partner institution with comparable expertise in the disciplines of teaching, learning, and child and adolescent development. (xiii) An entity operating a program that provides alternative routes to State certification of teachers. Any of the mandatory or optional entities in the partnership may be the fiscal agent of the grant. Note: So that the Department can confirm the eligibility of the LEA(s) that an applicant proposes to serve, applicants must include information in their applications that demonstrates that each LEA to be served by the project is a ``high-need LEA'' (as defined in this notice and in section 200(10) of the HEA). Applicants should review the application package for additional information on determining whether an LEA meets the definition of ``high-need LEA.'' Additionally, applicants must also partner with a school or department of arts and sciences within the partner institution. More information on eligible partnerships can be found in the TQP FAQ document found on the program Web site at http://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/teacher-quality/teacher-quality-partnership/. 2.a. Cost Sharing or Matching: Under section 203(c) of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1022b), each grant recipient must provide, from non-Federal sources, an amount equal to 100 percent of the amount of the grant, which may be provided in cash or in-kind, to carry out the activities supported by the grant. Grantees must budget their matching contributions on an annual basis relative to each annual award of TQP Grant Program funds. The HEA also authorizes the Secretary to waive this matching requirement for [[Page 32313]] any fiscal year for an eligible partnership if the Secretary determines that applying the matching requirement to the eligible partnership would result in serious hardship or an inability to carry out the authorized activities described in section 202 of the HEA. Applicants that wish to apply for a waiver for year one or for future years of the project may include a request in their application that describes why the 100 percent matching requirement would cause serious hardship or an inability to carry out project activities. Further information about applying for waivers can be found in the application package. However, given the importance of matching funds to the long-term success of the project, the Secretary expects eligible entities to identify appropriate matching funds. b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not- supplant funding requirements. In accordance with section 202(k) of the HEA, funds made available under this program must be used to supplement, and not supplant, other Federal, State, and local funds that would otherwise be expended to carry out activities under this program. For any high-need LEA that is funded by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian Education, the Secretary considers funds the LEA received from the Department of Interior's annual appropriation to be non-Federal funds. 3. Other: General Application Requirements: All applicants must meet the following general application requirements in order to be considered for funding. Except as specifically noted in this section, the general application requirements are from section 202 of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1022a). Each eligible partnership desiring a grant under this program must submit an application that contains-- (a) A needs assessment of the partners in the eligible partnership with respect to the preparation, ongoing training, professional development, and retention of general education and special education teachers, principals, and, as applicable, early childhood educators; (b) A description of the extent to which the program to be carried out with grant funds, as described in Absolute Priority 1 or Absolute Priority 2, in this notice, and, if the applicant chooses to do so, a Partnership Grant for the Development of Leadership Program, as described in section 202(f) of the HEA, will prepare prospective and new teachers with strong teaching skills; (c) A description of how such a program will prepare prospective and new teachers to understand and use research and data to modify and improve classroom instruction; (d) A description of-- (1) How the eligible partnership will coordinate strategies and activities assisted under the grant with other teacher preparation or professional development programs, and (2) How the activities of the partnership will be consistent with State, local, and other education reform activities that promote teacher quality and student academic achievement; (e) An assessment that describes the resources available to the eligible partnership, including-- (1) The integration of funds from other related sources; (2) The intended use of the grant funds; and (3) The commitment of the resources of the partnership to the activities assisted under this program, including financial support, faculty participation, and time commitments, and to the continuation of the activities when the grant ends. (f) A description of-- (1) How the eligible partnership will meet the purposes of the TQP Grant Program as specified in section 201 of the HEA; (2) How the partnership will carry out the activities required under Absolute Priority 1 or Absolute Priority 2, as described in this notice, based on the needs identified in paragraph (a), with the goal of improving student academic achievement; (4) The partnership's evaluation plan under section 204(a) of the HEA; (5) How the partnership will align the teacher preparation program with the-- (i) State early learning standards for ECE programs, as appropriate, and with the relevant domains of early childhood development; and (ii) Student academic achievement standards and academic content standards under section 1111(b)(1) of the ESEA as amended by ESSA, established by the State in which the partnership is located; (6) How the partnership will prepare general education teachers to teach students with disabilities, including training related to participation as a member of individualized education program teams, as defined in section 614(d)(1)(B) of the IDEA; (7) How the partnership will prepare general education and special education teachers to teach students who are limited English proficient; (8) How faculty at the partner institution will work during the term of the grant, with teachers who meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, in the classrooms of high-need schools served by the high-need LEA in the partnership to-- (i) Provide high-quality professional development activities to strengthen the content knowledge and teaching skills of elementary school and secondary school teachers; and (ii) Train other classroom teachers to implement literacy programs that incorporate the essential components of reading instruction; (9) How the partnership will design, implement, or enhance a year- long and rigorous teaching preservice clinical program component; (10) How the partnership will support in-service professional development strategies and activities; and (11) How the partnership will collect, analyze, and use data on the retention of all teachers and early childhood educators in schools and ECE programs located in the geographic area served by the partnership to evaluate the effectiveness of the partnership's teacher and educator support system. (g) With respect to the induction program required as part of the activities carried out under Absolute Priority 1 or Absolute Priority 2-- (1) A demonstration that the schools and departments within the IHE that are part of the induction program will effectively prepare teachers, including providing content expertise and expertise in teaching, as appropriate; (2) A demonstration of the eligible partnership's capability and commitment to, and the accessibility to and involvement of faculty in, the use of empirically-based practice and scientifically valid research on teaching and learning; (3) A description of how the teacher preparation program will design and implement an induction program to support, through not less than the first two years of teaching, all new teachers who are prepared by the teacher preparation program in the partnership and who teach in the high-need LEA in the partnership, and, to the extent practicable, all new teachers who teach in such high-need LEA, in the further development of the new teachers' teaching skills, including the use of mentors who are trained and compensated by such program for the mentors' work with new teachers; and (4) A description of how faculty involved in the induction program will [[Page 32314]] be able to substantially participate in an ECE program or elementary school or secondary school classroom setting, as applicable, including release time and receiving workload credit for such participation. IV. Application and Submission Information 1. Address to Request Application Package: Mia Howerton, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4w205, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 205-0147 or by email: [email protected]. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1- 800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) by contacting the program contact person listed in this section. 2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you must submit, are in the application package for this program. Notice of Intent to Apply: June 22, 2016. The Department will be able to develop a more efficient process for reviewing grant applications if it has a better understanding of the number of entities that intend to apply for funding under this competition. Therefore, the Secretary strongly encourages each potential applicant to notify the Department of its intent to submit an application for funding by completing the FY 16 Intent to Apply survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/tqpfy16. Applicants that fail to complete the FY 16 Intent to Apply survey may still apply for funding. Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application) is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend that you limit the application narrative (Part III) to no more than 50 pages, using the following standards:A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' margins at the top, bottom, and both sides. Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and captions. However, you may single space all text in charts, tables, figures, and graphs. Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch). Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial. An application submitted in any other font (including Times Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be accepted. The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one- page abstract, the resumes, the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of the application narrative (Part III). b. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of projects that may be proposed in applications for the TQP Grant Program, your application may include business information that you consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information'' and describe the process we use in determining whether any of that information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C 552, as amended). Because we plan to post the project narrative section of funded TQP Grant Program applications on our Web site, you may wish to request confidentiality of business information. Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c). 3. Submission Dates and Times: Applications Available: May 23, 2016. Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: June 22, 2016. Date of Pre-Application Webinars: The TQP program intends to hold Webinars designed to provide technical assistance to interested applicants. Details regarding the dates and times of these Webinars will be provided on the TQP Web site at http://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/teacher-quality/teacher-quality-partnership/applicant-info-and-eligibility/. Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 7, 2016. Applications for grants under this program must be submitted electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For information (including dates and times) about how to submit your application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery, if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, please refer to Other Submission Requirements in section IV of this notice. We do not consider an application that does not comply with the deadline requirements. Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the application process, the individual's application remains subject to all other requirements and limitations in this notice. Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 20, 2016. 4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this program. 5. Funding Restrictions: We specify unallowable costs in 2 CFR 200, subpart E. We reference regulations outlining funding restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. 6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification Number, and System for Award Management: To do business with the Department of Education, you must-- a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN); b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award Management (SAM) (formerly the Central Contractor Registry), the Government's primary registrant database; c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information while your application is under review by the Department and, if you are awarded a grant, during the project period. You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet at the following Web site: http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. A DUNS number can be created within one to two business days. [[Page 32315]] If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service. If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a new TIN, please allow two to five weeks for your TIN to become active. The SAM registration process can take approximately seven business days, but may take upwards of several weeks, depending on the completeness and accuracy of the data you enter into the SAM database. Thus, if you think you might want to apply for Federal financial assistance under a program administered by the Department, please allow sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number and TIN. We strongly recommend that you register early. Note: Once your SAM registration is active, it may be 24 to 48 hours before you can access the information in, and submit an application through, Grants.gov. If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will need to update your registration annually. This may take three or more business days. Information about SAM is available at www.SAM.gov. To further assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet, which you can find at: http://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html. In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov, you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html. 7. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under this program must be submitted electronically unless you qualify for an exception to this requirement in accordance with the instructions in this section. a. Electronic Submission of Applications. Applications for grants under the TQP Grant Program, CFDA number 84.336S, must be submitted electronically using the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be able to download a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a grant application to us. We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement. You may access the electronic grant application for the TQP Grant Program at www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable application package for this program by the CFDA number. Do not include the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.336, not 84.336S). Please note the following: When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find information about submitting an application electronically through the site, as well as the hours of operation. Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The amount of time it can take to upload an application will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov. You should review and follow the Education Submission Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are included in the application package for this program to ensure that you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5 system home page at www.G5.gov. In addition, for specific guidance and procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov, please refer to the Grants.gov Web site at: www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/apply-for-grants.html. You will not receive additional point value because you submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your application in paper format. You must submit all documents electronically, including all information you typically provide on the following forms: The Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non- Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and certifications. You must upload any narrative sections and all other attachments to your application as files in a read-only, non-modifiable Portable Document Format (PDF). Do not upload an interactive or fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than a read-only, non-modifiable PDF (e.g., Word, Excel, WordPerfect, etc.) or submit a password-protected file, we will not review that material. Please note that this could result in your application not being considered for funding because the material in question--for example, the project narrative--is critical to a meaningful review of your proposal. For that reason it is important to allow yourself adequate time to upload all material as PDF files. The Department will not convert material from other formats to PDF. Additional, detailed information on how to attach files is in the application instructions. Your electronic application must comply with any page- limit requirements described in this notice. After you electronically submit your application, you will receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that contains a Grants.gov tracking number. This notification indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department. Grants.gov will also notify you automatically by email if your application met all the Grants.gov validation requirements or if there were any errors (such as submission of your application by someone other than a registered [[Page 32316]] Authorized Organization Representative, or inclusion of an attachment with a file name that contains special characters). You will be given an opportunity to correct any errors and resubmit, but you must still meet the deadline for submission of applications. Once your application is successfully validated by Grants.gov, the Department will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send you an email with a unique PR/Award number for your application. These emails do not mean that your application is without any disqualifying errors. While your application may have been successfully validated by Grants.gov, it must also meet the Department's application requirements as specified in this notice and in the application instructions. Disqualifying errors could include, for instance, failure to upload attachments in a read-only, non-modifiable PDF; failure to submit a required part of the application; or failure to meet applicant eligibility requirements. It is your responsibility to ensure that your submitted application has met all of the Department's requirements. We may request that you provide us original signatures on forms at a later date. Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it. If you are prevented from electronically submitting your application on the application deadline date because of technical problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing instructions described elsewhere in this notice. If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person listed under For Further Information Contact in section VII of this notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that the problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. We will contact you after we determine whether your application will be accepted. Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system. Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application through the Grants.gov system because-- You do not have access to the Internet; or You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to the Grants.gov system; and No later than two weeks before the application deadline date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception prevents you from using the Internet to submit your application. If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the application deadline date. Address and mail or fax your statement to: Mia Howerton, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4w205, Washington, DC 20202-5960. FAX: (202) 205-5630. Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice. b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail. If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail the original and two copies of your application, on or before the application deadline date, to the Department at the following address: U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.336S) LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260. You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following: (1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark. (2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the U.S. Postal Service. (3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial carrier. (4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education. If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do not accept either of the following as proof of mailing: (1) A private metered postmark. (2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service. Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your local post office. We will not consider applications postmarked after the application deadline date. c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery. If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the application deadline date, to the Department at the following address: U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.336S), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7039, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260. The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays. Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail or hand deliver your application to the Department-- (1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are submitting your application; and (2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not receive this notification within 15 business days from the application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288. [[Page 32317]] V. Application Review Information 1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are from 34 CFR 75.210. An applicant may earn up to a total of 100 points based on the selection criteria. The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in parentheses. Each criterion also includes the sub- factors that the reviewers will consider in determining how well an application meets the criterion. The criteria are as follows: (a) Significance (up to 10 points). In determining the significance of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors-- (i) The extent to which the proposed project is likely to build local capacity to provide, improve, or expand services that address the needs of the target population. (ii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely to be attained by the proposed project, especially improvements in teaching and student achievement. (b) Quality of the Project Design (up to 35 points). In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the extent to which the proposed project consists of a comprehensive plan that includes a description of-- (i) The extent to which the proposed project is supported by strong theory (as defined in this notice). (ii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for maximizing the effectiveness of project services. (iii) The extent to which the proposed project represents an exceptional approach to the priority or priorities established for this competition. Note: Applicants are encouraged to develop logic models. These logic models should include the applicant's plan to implement and evaluate the proposed project. Applicants should connect available evidence of past history of successful outcomes to their logic models. Applicants may use resources such as the Pacific Education Laboratory's Education Logic Model Application (http://relpacific.mcrel.org/resources/elm-app) to help design their logic models. (c) Quality of the Management Plan (up to 30 points). In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors-- (i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing project tasks. (ii) The extent to which performance feedback and continuous improvement are integral to the design of the proposed project. (d) Quality of the Project Evaluation (up to 25 points). In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary considers-- (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide valid and reliable performance data on relevant outcomes. (ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the proposed project. (iii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward achieving intended outcomes. 2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable quality. In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). 3. Risk Assessment and Special Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 200.205, before awarding grants under this competition the Department conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may impose special conditions and, in appropriate circumstances, high risk conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible. VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, also. If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you. 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify administrative and national policy requirements in the application package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also incorporates your approved application as part of your binding commitments under the grant. 3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b). (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html. (c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period. 4. Performance Measures: The goal of the TQP Grant Program is to increase student achievement in K-12 schools by developing teachers who meet applicable State certification and licensure requirements. Under GPRA, the following measures will be used by the Department in assessing the performance of this program: (a) Performance Measure 1: Certification/Licensure. The percentage [[Page 32318]] of program graduates who have attained initial State certification/ licensure by passing all necessary licensure/certification assessments within one year of program completion. (b) Performance Measure 2: 1-Year Persistence. The percentage of program participants who were enrolled in the postsecondary program in the previous grant reporting period, did not graduate, and persisted in the postsecondary program in the current grant reporting period. (c) Performance Measure 3: 1-Year Employment Retention. The percentage of program completers who were employed for the first time as teachers of record in the preceding year by the partner high-need LEA or ECE program and were retained for the current school year. (d) Performance Measure 4: 3-Year Employment Retention. The percentage of program completers who were employed by the partner high- need LEA or ECE program for three consecutive years after initial employment. (e) Performance Measure 5: Student Learning. The percentage of grantees that report improved aggregate learning outcomes of students taught by new teachers. These data can be calculated using student growth, a teacher evaluation measure, or both. Applicants must also address the evaluation requirements in section 204(a) of the HEA. This section asks applicants to develop objectives and measures for increasing: (1) Achievement for all prospective and new teachers, as measured by the eligible partnership; (2) Teacher retention in the first three years of a teacher's career; (3) Improvement in the pass rates and scaled scores for initial State certification or licensure of teachers; and (4) The percentage of teachers who meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(14)(C)), hired by the high-need LEA participating in the eligible partnership; (5) The percentage of teachers who meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(14)(C)), hired by the high-need LEA who are members of underrepresented groups; (6) The percentage of teachers who meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(14)(C)), hired by the high-need LEA who teach high-need academic subject areas (such as reading, mathematics, science, and foreign language, including less commonly taught languages and critical foreign languages); (7) The percentage of teachers who meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(14)(C)), hired by the high-need LEA who teach in high-need areas (including special education, language instruction educational programs for limited English proficient students, and early childhood education); (8) The percentage of teachers who meet the applicable State certification and licensure requirements, including any requirements for certification obtained through alternative routes to certification, or, with regard to special education teachers, the qualifications described in section 612(a)(14)(C) of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(14)(C)), hired by the high-need LEA who teach in high-need schools, disaggregated by the elementary school and secondary school levels; (9) As applicable, the percentage of early childhood education program classes in the geographic area served by the eligible partnership taught by early childhood educators who are highly competent; and (10) As applicable, the percentage of teachers trained-- (i) To integrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction, including technology consistent with the principles of universal design for learning; and (ii) To use technology effectively to collect, manage, and analyze data to improve teaching and learning for the purpose of improving student academic achievement. Note: If funded, grantees will be asked to collect and report data on these measures in their project's annual performance reports (34 CFR 75.590). Applicants are also advised to consider these measures in conceptualizing the design, implementation, and evaluation of their proposed projects because of their importance in the application review process. Collection of data on these measures should be a part of the evaluation plan, along with measures of progress on goals and objectives that are specific to your project. All grantees will be expected to submit an annual performance report documenting their success in addressing these performance measures. 5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the performance targets in the grantee's approved application. In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). VII. Agency Contact FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mia Howerton, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W205, Washington, DC 20202- 5960. Telephone: (202) 205-0147 or by email: [email protected] or [email protected]. If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS, toll-free, at 1-800-877- 8339. VIII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this notice. Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System at: www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or PDF. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. [[Page 32319]] You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at: www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. Dated: May 18, 2016. Nadya Chinoy Dabby, Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement. [FR Doc. 2016-12101 Filed 5-20-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
![32306 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2016 / Notices
Educational and Developmental Dated: May 18, 2016. conduct violations within the Brigade.
Intervention Services (EDIS) clinics. The Aaron Siegel, The discussion of such information
system’s remote function allows EDIS Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison cannot be adequately segregated from
staff members to enter a young Officer, Department of Defense. other topics, which precludes opening
beneficiary’s data while conducting [FR Doc. 2016–12035 Filed 5–20–16; 8:45 am] the executive session of this meeting to
activities from that child’s school or BILLING CODE 5001–06–P the public. Accordingly, the Department
home. of the Navy/Assistant for
Administration has determined in
Affected Public: Individuals and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE writing that the meeting shall be
Households. partially closed to the public because
Annual Burden Hours: 13,913. Department of the Navy the discussions during the executive
Number of Respondents: 4,174. session from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
Meeting of the U.S. Naval Academy
will be concerned with matters
Responses per Respondent: 2. Board of Visitors
protected under sections 552b(c)(5), (6),
Annual Responses: 8,348. AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. and (7) of title 5, United States Code.
Average Burden per Response: 100 ACTION:Notice of partially closed Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.
minutes. meeting.
Dated: May 17, 2016.
Frequency: On occasion. SUMMARY: The U.S. Naval Academy N.A. Hagerty-Ford,
Information is collected from the Board of Visitors will meet to make such Commander, Judge Advocate General’s Corps,
individual to whom the record pertains, inquiry, as the Board shall deem U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
reports from physicians and other necessary, into the state of morale and [FR Doc. 2016–12071 Filed 5–20–16; 8:45 am]
medical department personnel, reports discipline, the curriculum, instruction, BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
and information from other sources physical equipment, fiscal affairs, and
including educational institutions, academic methods of the Naval
medical institutions, public and private Academy. The executive session of this DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
meeting from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
health, and welfare agencies.
on September 12, 2016, will include Applications for New Awards; Teacher
Information from the family may be discussions of new and pending Quality Partnership Grant Program
collected during an intake meeting, a administrative/minor disciplinary
meeting to develop a service plan, as a infractions and non-judicial punishment AGENCY: Office of Innovation and
result of provision of services, proceedings involving midshipmen Improvement, Department of Education.
performance of an evaluation, or other attending the Naval Academy to include ACTION: Notice.
coordination activities. The EDIS clinic but not limited to individual honor/
or Department of Defense Dependents conduct violations within the Brigade; Overview Information:
School (DoDDS) school must obtain Teacher Quality Partnership Grant
the disclosure of which would
permission from the family before constitute a clearly unwarranted Program.
Notice inviting applications for new
information is collected from or invasion of personal privacy. For this
awards for fiscal year (FY) 2016.
provided to an external agency, and reason, the executive session of this
Catalog of Federal Domestic
prior to conducting evaluations or meeting will be closed to the public.
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.336S.
providing services. Before information DATES: The open session of the meeting
DATES:
is released to an external agency the will be held on September 12, 2016,
Applications Available: May 23, 2016.
parents must sign a Health Insurance from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. The Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
Portability and Accountability Act executive session held from 11:00 a.m. June 22, 2016.
(HIPAA) release. to 12:00 p.m. will be the closed portion Deadline for Transmittal of
of the meeting. Applications: July 7, 2016.
Personally identifiable information
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Date of Pre-Application Webinars:
(PII) and protected health information
the Library of Congress, Washington, The Office of Innovation and
(PHI) that is collected by the system
DC. The meeting will be handicap Improvement intends to hold Webinars
includes: Name, Social Security Number
accessible. designed to provide technical assistance
(SSN), Family member prefix (FMP),
Birth Date, Race/Ethnicity, Gender, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to interested applicants for grants under
Marital Status, Spouse Information, Lieutenant Commander Eric Madonia, the Teacher Quality Partnership (TQP)
USN, Executive Secretary to the Board Grant Program. Details regarding the
Child Information, Disability
of Visitors, Office of the Superintendent, dates and times of these Webinars will
Information, Home, Personal Cell, and
U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD be provided on the TQP Web site at
Work Phone Numbers—Child and http://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/
21402–5000, 410–293–1503.
Parents, Emergency Contact, Education teacher-quality/teacher-quality-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
Information: Child’s School Address; partnership/applicant-info-and-
notice of meeting is provided per the
Individual educational program plans, eligibility/.
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
Sponsor Name, Sponsor SSN Sponsor Deadline for Intergovernmental
amended (5 U.S.C. App.). The executive
and Spouse rank or title, Sponsor’s unit, Review: September 20, 2016.
session of the meeting from 11:00 a.m.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Other child care locations, Provider’s to 12:00 p.m. on September 12, 2016,
name and title that evaluate and provide Full Text of Announcement
will consist of discussions of new and
intervention, Medical Information: pending administrative/minor I. Funding Opportunity Description
Clinics and medical summaries, EDIS disciplinary infractions and non-judicial Purpose of Program: The TQP Grant
process and activities data including punishments involving midshipmen Program aims to increase student
referral, evaluation, eligibility, and attending the Naval Academy to include achievement by improving the quality of
service plans. but not limited to, individual honor/ new teachers and prospective teachers
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 May 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM 23MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_32405/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2016 / Notices 32319
You may also access documents of the Council of Advisors on Science and accommodate oral public comments
Department published in the Federal Technology (PCAST), and describes the whenever possible. The PCAST expects
Register by using the article search functions of the Council. The Federal that public statements presented at its
feature at: www.federalregister.gov. Advisory Committee Act requires that meetings will not be repetitive of
Specifically, through the advanced public notice of these meetings be previously submitted oral or written
search feature at this site, you can limit announced in the Federal Register. statements.
your search to documents published by DATES: June 6, 2016, 4:00 p.m. to 4:30 The public comment period for this
the Department. p.m. meeting will take place on June 6, 2016
Dated: May 18, 2016. ADDRESSES: To receive the call-in at a time specified in the meeting
Nadya Chinoy Dabby, information, attendees should register agenda posted on the PCAST Web site
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and for the conference call on the PCAST at http://whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast.
Improvement. Web site, http://www.whitehouse.gov/ This public comment period is designed
[FR Doc. 2016–12101 Filed 5–20–16; 8:45 am] ostp/pcast no later than 12:00 p.m. ET only for substantive commentary on
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
on Thursday, June 2, 2016. PCAST’s work, not for business
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: marketing purposes.
Information regarding the meeting Oral Comments: To be considered for
agenda, time, location, and how to the public speaker list at the meeting,
Election Assistance Commission
register for the meeting is available on interested parties should register to
Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting the PCAST Web site at: http:// speak at http://whitehouse.gov/ostp/
whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast. Questions pcast, no later than 12:00 p.m. Eastern
AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance about the meeting should be directed to Time on June 2, 2016. Phone or email
Commission. Ms. Jennifer Michael at Jennifer_L_ reservations will not be accepted. To
ACTION: Notice of public meeting Michael@ostp.eop.gov, (202) 456–4444. accommodate as many speakers as
agenda. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The possible, the time for public comments
President’s Council of Advisors on will be limited to two (2) minutes per
DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, May 25, Science and Technology (PCAST) is an person, with a total public comment
2016, (9:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m.—EDT) advisory group of the nation’s leading period of up to 10 minutes. If more
PLACE: 1335 East West Highway (First scientists and engineers, appointed by speakers register than there is space
Floor Conference Room), Silver Spring, the President to augment the science available on the agenda, PCAST will
MD 20910. and technology advice available to him randomly select speakers from among
AGENDA: Commissioners will meet to from inside the White House, cabinet those who applied. Those not selected
release a 2016 Election Worker departments, and other Federal to present oral comments may always
Guidebook, State Compendium of agencies. See the Executive Order at file written comments with the
Election Worker Requirements, and http://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast. committee.
Election Worker Webisode. PCAST is consulted about and provides
Written Comments: Although written
Commissioners will hear from state and analyses and recommendations comments are accepted continuously,
local election officials, and research concerning a wide range of issues where
written comments should be submitted
experts to: (1) Discuss ways to recruit understandings from the domains of
to PCAST no later than 12:00 p.m.
and train election workers; and (2) science, technology, and innovation
Eastern Time on June 2, 2016 so that the
discuss the allocation of resources at the may bear on the policy choices before comments may be made available to the
polls on Election Day. the President. PCAST is co-chaired by
PCAST members prior to this meeting
Dr. John P. Holdren, Assistant to the
STATUS: This meeting will be open to the for their consideration. Information
President for Science and Technology,
public. regarding how to submit comments and
and Director, Office of Science and
PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: documents to PCAST is available at
Technology Policy, Executive Office of
Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (301) 563– http://whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast in the
the President, The White House; and Dr.
3961. section entitled ‘‘Connect with PCAST.’’
Eric S. Lander, President, Broad
Signed: Institute of the Massachusetts Institute Please note that because PCAST
Bryan Whitener, of Technology and Harvard. operates under the provisions of FACA,
Director of Communications and Type of Meeting: Open. all public comments and/or
Clearinghouse, U.S. Election Assistance Proposed Schedule and Agenda: The presentations will be treated as public
Commission. President’s Council of Advisors on documents and will be made available
[FR Doc. 2016–12177 Filed 5–19–16; 4:15 pm] Science and Technology (PCAST) is for public inspection, including being
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–P
scheduled to hold a public conference posted on the PCAST Web site.
call on June 6, 2016 from 4:00 p.m. to Meeting Accommodations:
4:30 p.m. Individuals requiring special
Open Portion of Meeting: During this accommodation to access this public
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY open meeting, PCAST is scheduled to meeting should contact Ms. Jennifer
President’s Council of Advisors on discuss its study on Forensic Science in Michael at least ten business days prior
Science and Technology Federal Criminal Courts: Ensuring to the meeting so that appropriate
Reliable Principles and Methods.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
arrangements can be made.
AGENCY: Office of Science, Department Additional information and the agenda,
of Energy. including any changes that arise, will be Issued in Washington, DC, on May 16,
2016.
ACTION: Notice of open teleconference. posted at the PCAST Web site at: http://
whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast. LaTanya R. Butler,
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the Public Comments: It is the policy of Deputy Committee Management Officer.
schedule and summary agenda for a the PCAST to accept written public [FR Doc. 2016–11959 Filed 5–20–16; 8:45 am]
conference call of the President’s comments of any length, and to BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 May 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM 23MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_32405/page/14.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-07 15:07:41
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 15:07:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Dates | Applications Available: May 23, 2016. | |
| Contact | Mia Howerton, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W205, Washington, DC 20202- 5960. Telephone: (202) 205-0147 or by email: [email protected] or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 32306 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR