81 FR 33463 - Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules From the People's Republic of China
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 102 (May 26, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 102 (May 26, 2016)
| Page Range | 33463-33465 | |
| FR Document | 2016-12540 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 33463-33465] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-12540] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-979] Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules From the People's Republic of China AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), 19 CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3), the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') is initiating, and issuing the preliminary results, of a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty (``AD'') order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, (``solar cells'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') regarding whether Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (``Hangzhou Sunny'') is the successor-in-interest to Hangzhou Zhejiang University Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (``Hangzhou ZU Sunny''). Based on the information on the record, we preliminarily determine that Hangzhou Sunny is the successor-in-interest to Hangzhou ZU Sunny and, as such, is entitled to Hangzhou ZU Sunny's AD cash deposit rate with respect to entries of subject merchandise. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective May 26, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2769. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 7, 2012, the Department published the antidumping order on solar cells from the PRC in the Federal [[Page 33464]] Register.\1\ On April 4, 2016, Hangzhou Sunny requested that the Department initiate an expedited changed circumstances review to determine that Hangzhou Sunny is the successor-in-interest to Hangzhou ZU Sunny for AD purposes.\2\ On May 4, 2016, Hangzhou Sunny responded to a supplemental questionnaire issued by the Department on April 29, 2016.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73018 (December 7, 2012) (``Order''). \2\ See Letter from Hangzhou Sunny to the Department regarding, ``Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules From the People's Republic of China: Request for Expedited Changed Circumstances Review'' (April 4, 2016) (``CCR Request''). \3\ See Letter from Hangzhou Sunny to the Department, regarding ``Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules From the People's Republic of China: Supplemental Response'' (May 4, 2016) (``Supplemental Response''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, subject to certain exceptions.\4\ For the full scope of the Order, see the accompanying preliminary decision memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China'' (``Preliminary Results Memorandum''), dated concurrently with, and adopted by, this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the following subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''): 8501.61.0000, 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, and 8501.31.8000. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the subject merchandise is dispositive. Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from an interested party for a review of, an AD order which shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. In the past, the Department has used changed circumstances reviews to address the applicability of cash deposit rates after there have been changes in the name or structure of a respondent, such as a merger or spinoff (``successor-in-interest,'' or ``successorship,'' determinations). Thus, consistent with Department practice, the information submitted by Hangzhou Sunny, which includes information regarding a name change, demonstrates changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See 19 CFR 351.216(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Therefore, in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department is initiating a changed circumstances review to determine whether Hangzhou Sunny is the successor-in-interest to Hangzhou ZU Sunny. Preliminary Determination When it concludes that expedited action is warranted, the Department may publish the notice of initiation and preliminary results for a changed circumstances review concurrently.\6\ The Department has combined the notice of initiation and preliminary results in successor- in-interest cases when sufficient documentation has been provided supporting the request.\7\ In this instance, because we have determined that the information necessary to support the request is on the record, we find that expedited action is warranted, and are combining the notice of initiation and the notice of preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). \7\ See, e.g., Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada, 70 FR 50299 (August 26, 2005). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In determining whether one company is the successor to another for purposes of applying the AD law, the Department examines a number of factors including, but not limited to, changes in: (1) Management, (2) production facilities, (3) suppliers, and (4) customer base.\8\ While no one or several of these factors will necessarily provide a dispositive indication of succession, the Department will generally consider one company to be the successor to another company if its resulting operation is essentially the same as that of its predecessor.\9\ Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as the prior company, the Department will assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its predecessor.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See, e.g., Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China, 79 FR 48117, 48118 (August 15, 2014), unchanged in Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 58740 (September 30, 2014). \9\ Id. \10\ See Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review: Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan, 69 FR 67890 (November 22, 2004) citing, Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992); and, Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstance Review, 70 FR 17063 (April 4, 2005). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In its April 4, 2016 CCR Request and its May 4, 2016 Supplemental Response, Hangzhou Sunny provided evidence for us to preliminarily determine that it is the successor-in-interest to Hangzhou ZU Sunny. Specifically, Hangzhou Sunny demonstrated that it is essentially the same as Hangzhou ZU Sunny despite some changes to its predecessor's management, the production facility, suppliers, or the customer base following the name change.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See, generally, CCR Request and Supplemental Response. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to the information provided, although there were certain changes to the board of directors and management when comparing Hangzhou Sunny to Hangzhou ZU Sunny, Hangzhou Sunny is owned, managed and operated by the same principal owners as Hangzhou ZU Sunny.\12\ Regarding its production of the subject merchandise, Hangzhou Sunny has stated that its production facility is the same as that of Hangzhou ZU Sunny.\13\ Hangzhou Sunny also provided documentation showing that there has been no material changes in suppliers of inputs or services related to the production, sale and distribution of the subject merchandise \14\ or in the U.S. customer base.\15\ Based the foregoing, which is explained in greater detail in the Preliminary Results Memorandum, we preliminarily determine that Hangzhou Sunny is the successor-in-interest to Hangzhou ZU Sunny and, as such, that it is entitled to Hangzhou ZU Sunny's AD cash-deposit rate with respect to entries of subject merchandise. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Preliminary Results Memorandum at 3. \13\ Id. \14\ Id., at 3. \15\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Should our final results remain the same as these preliminary results, effective the date of publication of the final results, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise exported by Hangzhou [[Page 33465]] Sunny at the AD cash-deposit rate applicable to Hangzhou ZU Sunny. Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 14 days after the date of publication of this notice.\16\ Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in such briefs, may be filed not later than seven days after the due date for case briefs.\17\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this changed circumstances review are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue and (2) a brief summary of the argument with an electronic version included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ The Department is exercising its discretion under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) to alter the time limit for the filing of case briefs. \17\ The Department is exercising its discretion under 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) to alter the time limit for the filing of rebuttal briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any interested party may request a hearing within 14 days of publication of this notice.\18\ Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 in a room to be determined.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ The Department is exercising its discretion under 19 CFR 351.310(c) to alter the time limit for requesting a hearing. \19\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed electronically using Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'').\20\ An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (``ET'') on the due date. Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. \21\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), we will issue the final results of this changed-circumstances review no later than 270 days after the date on which this review was initiated or within 45 days if all parties agree to the outcome of the review. We are issuing and publishing this initiation and preliminary results notice in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3). Dated: May 20, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-12540 Filed 5-25-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 102 / Thursday, May 26, 2016 / Notices 33463
releasable transcript will be available for The application to reorganize FTZ 191 146.41) or domestic status (19 CFR
download at www.bbg.gov promptly per under the ASF is approved, subject to 146.43).
5 U.S.C. 552b(f). the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, Dated: May 29, 2016.
Information regarding member votes including Section 400.13, to the Board’s Andrew McGilvray,
to close the meeting and expected standard 2,000-acre activation limit for
Executive Secretary.
attendees can also be found on the the zone, to an ASF sunset provision for
[FR Doc. 2016–12538 Filed 5–25–16; 8:45 am]
Agency’s public Web site. magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Site 5 if not activated BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Persons interested in obtaining more within five years from the month of
information should contact Oanh Tran approval, and to an ASF sunset
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
at (202) 203–4545. provision for usage-driven sites that
would terminate authority for Site 12 if International Trade Administration
Oanh Tran, no foreign-status merchandise is
Director of Board Operations. admitted for a bona fide customs [A–570–979]
[FR Doc. 2016–12527 Filed 5–24–16; 11:15 am] purpose within three years from the
BILLING CODE 8610–01–P month of approval. Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of Antidumping Duty Changed
May 2016. Circumstances Review: Crystalline
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Paul Piquado, Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Not Assembled Into Modules From the
Foreign-Trade Zones Board Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate People’s Republic of China
[Order No. 1998] Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Attest: International Trade Administration,
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone Andrew McGilvray, Department of Commerce.
191 Under Alternative Site Framework; Executive Secretary. SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 751(b) of
Palmdale, California [FR Doc. 2016–12534 Filed 5–25–16; 8:45 am] the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Act’’), 19 CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-
Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
351.221(c)(3), the Department of
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign- Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) is
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE initiating, and issuing the preliminary
following Order: results, of a changed circumstances
Foreign-Trade Zones Board review of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’)
Whereas, the Board adopted the
order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic
alternative site framework (ASF) (15 [B–4–2016] cells, whether or not assembled into
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the
modules, (‘‘solar cells’’) from the
establishment or reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 196—Fort People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
zones; Worth, Texas; Authorization of regarding whether Hangzhou Sunny
Whereas, the City of Palmdale, Production Activity; General Electric Energy Science and Technology Co.,
California, grantee of Foreign-Trade Transportation (Locomotives, Drill Ltd. (‘‘Hangzhou Sunny’’) is the
Zone 191, submitted an application to Equipment, Off-Highway Vehicle successor-in-interest to Hangzhou
the Board (FTZ Docket B–74–2015, Wheels, Inverters and Brake Systems), Zhejiang University Sunny Energy
docketed November 5, 2015) for Fort Worth and Haslet, Texas Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
authority to reorganize under the ASF
On January 20, 2016, General Electric (‘‘Hangzhou ZU Sunny’’). Based on the
with a service area of a portion of Los
Transportation submitted a notification information on the record, we
Angeles County, California, as described
of proposed production activity to the preliminarily determine that Hangzhou
in the application, adjacent to the Los
Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board for its Sunny is the successor-in-interest to
Angeles/Long Beach U.S. Customs and
facilities within Subzone 196B, in Fort Hangzhou ZU Sunny and, as such, is
Border Protection port of entry, FTZ
Worth and Haslet, Texas. entitled to Hangzhou ZU Sunny’s AD
191’s existing Sites 1 and 5 would be
cash deposit rate with respect to entries
categorized as magnet sites, existing Site The notification was processed in
of subject merchandise. Interested
12 would be categorized as a usage- accordance with the regulations of the
parties are invited to comment on these
driven site, acreage would be reduced at FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
preliminary results.
Site 1, and Sites 2 through 4 and 6 notice in the Federal Register inviting
through 11 would be removed from the public comment (81 FR 5704–5707, DATES: Effective May 26, 2016.
zone; February 3, 2016). The FTZ Board has FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Whereas, notice inviting public determined that no further review of the Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office
comment was given in the Federal activity is warranted at this time. The IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
Register (80 FR 69937–69938, production activity described in the International Trade Administration,
November 12, 2015) and the application notification is authorized, subject to the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
has been processed pursuant to the FTZ FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Act and the Board’s regulations; and, including Section 400.14, and further Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Whereas, the Board adopts the subject to a restriction requiring that 482–2769.
findings and recommendation of the inputs classified under HTSUS SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
examiner’s report, and finds that the Subheadings 5603.94, 5607.50, 5909.00,
requirements of the FTZ Act and the 6305.20, 6307.90, 7019.19 and 7019.51 Background
Board’s regulations are satisfied; as well as HTSUS Headings 3208 and On December 7, 2012, the Department
Now, therefore, the Board hereby 3209 be admitted to the subzone in published the antidumping order on
orders: privileged foreign status (19 CFR solar cells from the PRC in the Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 May 25, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM 26MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_33565/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 102 / Thursday, May 26, 2016 / Notices 33465
Sunny at the AD cash-deposit rate days if all parties agree to the outcome Consistent with the decision of the
applicable to Hangzhou ZU Sunny. of the review. United States Court of Appeals for the
We are issuing and publishing this Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co.
Public Comment
initiation and preliminary results notice v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
Interested parties may submit case in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) 1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by
briefs not later than 14 days after the and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
date of publication of this notice.16 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3). United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited 2010) (‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the
Dated: May 20, 2016.
to issues raised in such briefs, may be Department is notifying the public that
filed not later than seven days after the Paul Piquado,
the final judgment in these cases is not
due date for case briefs.17 Parties who Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
in harmony with the Department’s final
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in Compliance.
results of the antidumping duty
this changed circumstances review are [FR Doc. 2016–12540 Filed 5–25–16; 8:45 am]
administrative review of the
requested to submit with each BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P antidumping duty order on certain
argument: (1) A statement of the issue frozen fish fillets from the Socialist
and (2) a brief summary of the argument Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’)
with an electronic version included. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE covering the period of review (‘‘POR’’)
Any interested party may request a August 1, 2009, through July 31, 2010.
hearing within 14 days of publication of International Trade Administration
Thus, the Department is amending the
this notice.18 Hearing requests should [A–552–801] final results with respect to the
contain the following information: (1) weighted-average dumping margins for
The party’s name, address, and Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the QVD and the Separate-Rate Applicants.4
telephone number; (2) the number of Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice DATES: Effective April 11, 2016.
participants; and (3) a list of the issues of Court Decisions Not in Harmony
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
to be discussed. Oral presentations at With Final Results of Administrative
Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations
the hearing will be limited to issues Review and Notice of Amended Final
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
raised in the briefs. If a request for a Results of Antidumping Duty
International Trade Administration,
hearing is made, parties will be notified Administrative Review
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
of the time and date for the hearing to
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
be held at the U.S. Department of
International Trade Administration, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
Department of Commerce. 482–2243.
NW., Washington, DC 20230 in a room
to be determined.19 SUMMARY: On March 30, 2016, the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
All submissions, with limited United States Court of International Background
exceptions, must be filed electronically Trade (‘‘the Court’’) issued final
judgments in Catfish Farmers of On March 14, 2012, the Department
using Enforcement and Compliance’s
America et al. v. United States, Consol. issued AR7 Final Results.5 Vinh Hoan
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Court No. 12–00087, sustaining the and Petitioners 6 timely filed complaints
Centralized Electronic Service System
Department of Commerce’s (‘‘the with the Court and challenged certain
(‘‘ACCESS’’).20 An electronically filed
aspects of the AR7 Final Results. On
document must be received successfully Department’’) AR7 Remand final
December 18, 2014, the Court remanded
in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time results.1 In the AR7 Remand, the
the Department’s AR7 Final Results and
(‘‘ET’’) on the due date. Documents Department recalculated the weighted-
instructed the Department to reconsider
excepted from the electronic submission average dumping margin for QVD Food
each of the following issues: (1) The
requirements must be filed manually Co. Ltd. (‘‘QVD’’) and Vinh Hoan
significance of presumed qualifiable
(i.e., in paper form) with the APO/ Corporation (‘‘Vinh Hoan’’) using
differences between farm-gate and
Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and revised surrogate values for by-products
wholesale prices with respect to whole
stamped with the date and time of (fish waste, fresh broken meat, and
live fish; (2) the reliability of the
receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.21 frozen broken fillets by-products, and
Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), Bangladeshi Department of Agricultural
capping the fish oil by-product Marketing (‘‘DAM’’) data with respect to
we will issue the final results of this surrogate value).2 Because QVD’s
changed-circumstances review no later whole live fish; (3) the fact that there are
margin changed, it also becomes the no quantities associated with the DAM
than 270 days after the date on which margin for those companies not
this review was initiated or within 45 data; (4) surrogate country selection in
individually examined but receiving a
separate rate.3 East Sea Seafoods Limited Liability Company; (7)
16 The Department is exercising its discretion
Hiep Thanh Seafood Joint Stock Company; (8)
under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) to alter the time limit 1 See Final Results Of Redetermination Pursuant Southern Fisheries Industries Company Ltd.; and
for the filing of case briefs. To Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 12–00087, Slip (9) Vinh Quang Fisheries Joint-Stock Company
17 The Department is exercising its discretion
Op. 14–146 (CIT December 18, 2014), dated June 26, (collectively, ‘‘Separate-Rate Applicants’’).
under 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) to alter the time limit 2015, (‘‘AR7 Remand’’) available at http:// 4 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the
for the filing of rebuttal briefs. enforcement.trade.gov/remands/14-146.pdf. Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and
18 The Department is exercising its discretion 2 See AR7 Remand at 25–29. The weighted- Partial Rescission of the Seventh Antidumping Duty
under 19 CFR 351.310(c) to alter the time limit for average margin for Vinh Hoan remains de minimis. Administrative Review, 77 FR 15039 (March 14,
requesting a hearing. However, as explained in the ‘‘Background’’ 2012) (‘‘AR7 Final Results’’) and accompanying
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
section, the Department’s recalculation of these Issues and Decision Memorandum.
20 ACCESS is available to registered users at surrogate values now yields a different weighted- 5 Id.
https://access.trade.gov and available to all parties average dumping margin for QVD. Thus, consistent 6 Catfish Farmers of America and the following
in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the with our practice, the Department has amended the individual U.S. catfish processors: America’s Catch,
main Department of Commerce building. final results with respect to QVD. Consolidated Catfish Companies, LLC dba Country
21 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 3 These companies include: (1) Anvifish Joint Select Catfish, Delta Pride Catfish, Inc., Harvest
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Stock Company; (2) Asia Commerce Fisheries Joint Select Catfish, Inc., Heartland Catfish Company,
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR Stock Company; (3) Bien Dong Seafood; (4) Binh An Pride of the Pond, and Simmons Farm Raised
39263 (July 6, 2011). Seafood Joint Stock Company; (5) CASEAMEX; (6) Catfish, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 May 25, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM 26MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_33565/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-05-26 01:13:40
Document Modified: 2016-05-26 01:13:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective May 26, 2016. | |
| Contact | Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2769. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 33463 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR