81 FR 33617 - Safety Zone; Allegheny River Mile 43.5 to 44.5, Kittanning, Pennsylvania
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 103 (May 27, 2016)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 103 (May 27, 2016)
| Page Range | 33617-33619 | |
| FR Document | 2016-12628 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 33617-33619] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-12628] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2016-0323] RIN 1625-AA00 Safety Zone; Allegheny River Mile 43.5 to 44.5, Kittanning, Pennsylvania AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone for all navigable waters of the Allegheny River from mile 43.5 to mile 44.5. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created from a barge-based firework display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 27, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG- 2016-0323 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email MST1 Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 412-221-0807, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis On March 10, 2016, the Fort Armstrong Folk Festival notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a 30-minute fireworks display between 9 p.m. and 10 p.m. on August 6, 2016. The fireworks will be launched from a barge in the vicinity of Allegheny River mile 43.5 to mile 44.5. Hazards from fireworks displays include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels and the navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled event by establishing a 90-minute safety zone beginning 30 minutes before the display until 30 minutes after the display is over during the hours of 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on the same date. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule The Captain of the Port Pittsburgh (COTP) proposes to establish a safety zone lasting 90 minutes between the hours of 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. on August 6, 2016. The safety zone would cover all navigable waters of the Allegheny River from mile 43.5. to mile 44.5. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the fireworks display scheduled to take place for 30 minutes between 9 p.m. and 10 p.m. on the same date. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document. IV. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, and duration, of the safety zone and the low traffic nature of this area. The safety zone will close a small section of the Allegheny River for less than two hours. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow other waterway users to seek permission to enter the zone. Requests to transit the safety zone area would be considered on a case-by-case basis. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not [[Page 33618]] have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A. above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501- 3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety zone lasting less than two hours that would prohibit entry into the safety zone. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. V. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions. We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 15086). Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is published. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0323 under the undesignated center heading Eighth Coast Guard District to read as follows: Sec. 165.T08-0323 Safety Zone; Allegheny River Mile 43.5 to Mile 44.5, Kittanning, PA (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Allegheny River from mile 43.5 to mile 44.5. (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol [[Page 33619]] Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone. (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in Sec. 165.23, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative. (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative at 412-221-0807. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative. (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced for 90 minutes during the hours of 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on August 6, 2016. (e) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone as well as any changes in the enforcement period. Dated: April 25, 2016. L. McClain, Jr., Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Pittsburgh. [FR Doc. 2016-12628 Filed 5-26-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2016 / Proposed Rules 33617
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, authorized by the Captain of the Port duration of the zone is intended to
notify your appropriate principal inspector, Pittsburgh or a designated ensure the safety of vessels and these
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager representative. We invite your navigable waters before, during, and
of the local flight standards district office/
comments on this proposed rulemaking. after the fireworks display scheduled to
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable DATES: Comments and related material take place for 30 minutes between 9
level of safety may be used for any repair, must be received by the Coast Guard on p.m. and 10 p.m. on the same date. No
modification, or alteration required by this or before June 27, 2016. vessel or person would be permitted to
AD if it is approved by the Boeing ADDRESSES: You may submit comments enter the safety zone without obtaining
Commercial Airplanes Organization permission from the COTP or a
identified by docket number USCG–
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has designated representative. The
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 2016–0323 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http:// regulatory text we are proposing appears
ACO, to make those findings. To be
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public at the end of this document.
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet Participation and Request for IV. Regulatory Analyses
the certification basis of the airplane and the Comments’’ portion of the
approval must specifically refer to this AD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for We developed this proposed rule after
further instructions on submitting considering numerous statutes and
(m) Related Information
comments. Executive orders related to rulemaking.
(1) For more information about this AD, Below we summarize our analyses
contact Francis Smith, Aerospace Engineer, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If based on a number of these statutes and
Cabin Safety and Environmental Controls you have questions about this proposed
Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Executive orders and we discuss First
rulemaking, call or email MST1 Jennifer Amendment rights of protestors.
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh,
phone: 425–917–6596; fax: 425–917–6590; A. Regulatory Planning and Review
email: francis.smith@faa.gov. U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 412–221–
(2) For service information identified in 0807, email Jennifer.L.Haggins@ Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial uscg.mil. direct agencies to assess the costs and
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: benefits of available regulatory
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
alternatives and, if regulation is
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone: 206– I. Table of Abbreviations
544–5000, extension 1; fax: 206–766–5680; necessary, to select regulatory
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You CFR Code of Federal Regulations approaches that maximize net benefits.
may review copies of the referenced service DHS Department of Homeland Security Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane FR Federal Register importance of quantifying both costs
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking and benefits, of reducing costs, of
WA. For information on the availability of § Section
U.S.C. United States Code
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. flexibility. This NPRM has not been
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 17, II. Background, Purpose, and Legal designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
2016. Basis action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Dionne Palermo, On March 10, 2016, the Fort Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Armstrong Folk Festival notified the reviewed by the Office of Management
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Coast Guard that it will be conducting and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2016–12353 Filed 5–26–16; 8:45 am] a 30-minute fireworks display between This regulatory action determination
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 9 p.m. and 10 p.m. on August 6, 2016. is based on the size, location, and
The fireworks will be launched from a duration, of the safety zone and the low
barge in the vicinity of Allegheny River traffic nature of this area. The safety
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND mile 43.5 to mile 44.5. Hazards from zone will close a small section of the
SECURITY fireworks displays include accidental Allegheny River for less than two hours.
discharge of fireworks, dangerous Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
Coast Guard projectiles, and falling hot embers or a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
other debris. VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
33 CFR Part 165 The purpose of this rulemaking is to zone, and the rule would allow other
ensure the safety of vessels and the waterway users to seek permission to
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0323]
navigable waters before, during, and enter the zone. Requests to transit the
RIN 1625–AA00 after the scheduled event by safety zone area would be considered on
establishing a 90-minute safety zone a case-by-case basis.
Safety Zone; Allegheny River Mile 43.5 beginning 30 minutes before the display
to 44.5, Kittanning, Pennsylvania B. Impact on Small Entities
until 30 minutes after the display is over
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. during the hours of 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. the same date. The Coast Guard 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
proposes this rulemaking under requires Federal agencies to consider
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. the potential impact of regulations on
establish a temporary safety zone for all small entities during rulemaking. The
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
navigable waters of the Allegheny River III. Discussion of Proposed Rule term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
from mile 43.5 to mile 44.5. The safety The Captain of the Port Pittsburgh businesses, not-for-profit organizations
zone is needed to protect personnel, (COTP) proposes to establish a safety that are independently owned and
vessels, and the marine environment zone lasting 90 minutes between the operated and are not dominant in their
from potential hazards created from a hours of 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. on August fields, and governmental jurisdictions
barge-based firework display. Entry of 6, 2016. The safety zone would cover all with populations of less than 50,000.
vessels or persons into this zone is navigable waters of the Allegheny River The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
prohibited unless specifically from mile 43.5. to mile 44.5. The 605(b) that this proposed rule would not
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 May 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM 27MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_33720/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2016 / Proposed Rules 33619
Commander, including a Coast Guard incentivizing more timely filing or Office with respect to such Trademark
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer examination of applications and other and TTAB operations. The Director may
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a filings and more efficient resolution of set individual fees at, below, or above
Federal, State, and local officer appeals and trials; and promoting the their respective cost. Section 10
designated by or assisting the Captain of efficiency of the process, in large part authority includes flexibility to set
the Port Pittsburgh (COTP) in the through lower-cost electronic filing individual fees in a way that furthers
enforcement of the safety zone. options. key policy considerations, while taking
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general DATES: Written comments must be into account the cost of the respective
safety zone regulations in § 165.23, you received on or before July 11, 2016. services. Section 10 also establishes
may not enter the safety zone described certain procedural requirements for
ADDRESSES: The USPTO prefers that
in paragraph (a) of this section unless setting or adjusting fee regulations, such
comments be submitted via electronic
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s as public hearings and input from the
mail message to TMFRNotices@
designated representative. Trademark Public Advisory Committee
uspto.gov. Written comments also may
(2) To seek permission to enter, (TPAC) and oversight by Congress.
be submitted by mail to the
contact the COTP or the COTP’s Accordingly, on October 14, 2015, the
Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box
representative at 412–221–0807. Those Director notified the TPAC of the
1451, Alexandria, VA 22313–1451,
in the safety zone must comply with all Office’s intent to set or adjust trademark
attention Jennifer Chicoski; by hand
lawful orders or directions given to fees and submitted a preliminary
delivery to the Trademark Assistance
them by the COTP or the COTP’s trademark fee proposal with supporting
Center, Concourse Level, James Madison
designated representative. materials. The preliminary trademark
Building-East Wing, 600 Dulany Street,
(d) Enforcement period. This section fee proposal and associated materials
Alexandria, VA 22314, attention
will be enforced for 90 minutes during are available at http://www.uspto.gov/
Jennifer Chicoski; or by electronic mail
the hours of 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on August about-us/performance-and-planning/
message via the Federal eRulemaking
6, 2016. fee-setting-and-adjusting. The fee
Portal. See the Federal eRulemaking
(e) Informational broadcasts. The proposal had three objectives to achieve
Portal Web site (http://
COTP or a designated representative the goals of recovering prospective
www.regulations.gov) for additional
will inform the public through aggregate costs of operation while
instructions on providing comments via
broadcast notices to mariners of the furthering key policy considerations: (1)
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. All
enforcement period for the safety zone To better align fees with full costs; (2)
comments submitted directly to the
as well as any changes in the to protect the integrity of the register;
USPTO or provided on the Federal
enforcement period. and (3) to promote the efficiency of the
eRulemaking Portal should include the
Dated: April 25, 2016. trademark process.
docket number (PTO–T–2016–0005).
The TPAC held a public hearing in
L. McClain, Jr., The comments will be available for
Alexandria, Virginia on November 3,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of public inspection on the USPTO’s Web
2015. Transcripts of this hearing and
the Port Pittsburgh. site at http://www.uspto.gov, on the
comments submitted to the TPAC in
[FR Doc. 2016–12628 Filed 5–26–16; 8:45 am] Federal eRulemaking Portal, and at the
writing are available for review at http://
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Office of the Commissioner for
www.uspto.gov/about-us/performance-
Trademarks, Madison East, Tenth Floor,
and-planning/fee-setting-and-adjusting.
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, VA
The TPAC released its report regarding
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 22314. Because comments will be made
the preliminary proposed fees on
available for public inspection,
November 30, 2015. The report can be
Patent and Trademark Office information that is not desired to be
found online at http://www.uspto.gov/
made public, such as an address or
about-us/performance-and-planning/
37 CFR Parts 2 and 7 phone number, should not be included. fee-setting-and-adjusting. The Office has
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: considered the comments, advice, and
[Docket No. PTO–T–2016–0005]
Jennifer Chicoski, Office of the Deputy recommendations received from the
RIN 0651–AD08 Commissioner for Trademark TPAC and the public in setting the fees
Examination Policy, by email at proposed herein.
Trademark Fee Adjustment TMPolicy@uspto.gov, or by telephone at In the report, the TPAC expressed
AGENCY: United States Patent and (571) 272–8943. general support for an increase in fees
Trademark Office, Commerce. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: in order to recover full costs and
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. Purpose: Section 10 of the AIA maintain a sufficient operating reserve.
(Section 10) authorizes the Director of The TPAC also expressed concerns over
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and the USPTO (Director) to set or adjust by some of the fee increases and the
Trademark Office (Office or USPTO) rule any fee established, authorized, or potential impact on customers and
proposes to set or increase certain charged under the Trademark Act of included alternative fee proposals. The
trademark fees, as authorized by the 1946, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq., as USPTO has reviewed the report and has
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act amended (the Trademark Act or the Act) amended the initial fee proposal to
(AIA). The proposed fees will allow the for any services performed by, or address some of the concerns, where
Office to recover the aggregate estimated materials furnished by, the Office. See possible, so as to remain consistent with
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
cost of Trademark and Trademark Trial section 10 of the AIA, Public Law 112– the rulemaking goals and objectives.
and Appeal Board (TTAB) operations 29, 125 Stat. 284, 316–17. Section 10 The TPAC expressed general support
and USPTO administrative services that prescribes that fees may be set or for the stated goals of full cost recovery
support Trademark operations. The adjusted only to recover the aggregate with an increase in certain trademark
proposals will further USPTO strategic estimated costs to the Office for fees and, in particular, for the goal of
objectives by: Better aligning fees with processing, activities, services, and recovering more of the costs for TTAB
the full cost of products and services; materials relating to trademarks, operations. The report specifically
protecting the integrity of the register by including administrative costs to the expressed uniform support for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 May 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM 27MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_33720/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-07 15:10:16
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 15:10:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 27, 2016. | |
| Contact | If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email MST1 Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 412-221-0807, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 33617 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA00 | |
| CFR Associated | Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR