81 FR 33636 - Availability of Data on Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances From New Unit Set-Asides for the 2016 Compliance Year
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 103 (May 27, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 103 (May 27, 2016)
| Page Range | 33636-33637 | |
| FR Document | 2016-12485 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 33636-33637] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-12485] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 97 [FRL-9947-02-OAR] Availability of Data on Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances From New Unit Set-Asides for the 2016 Compliance Year AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of data availability (NODA). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing notice of the availability of preliminary calculations of emission allowance allocations to certain units under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). Under the CSAPR federal implementation plans (FIPs), portions of each covered state's annual emissions budgets for each of the four CSAPR emissions trading programs are reserved for allocation to electricity generating units that commenced commercial operation on or after January 1, 2010 (new units) and certain other units not otherwise obtaining allowance allocations under the FIPs. The quantities of allowances allocated to eligible units from each new unit set-aside (NUSA) under the FIPs are calculated in an annual one- or two-round allocation process. EPA has completed preliminary calculations for the first round of NUSA allowance allocations for the 2016 compliance year and has posted spreadsheets containing the calculations on EPA's Web site. EPA will consider timely objections to the preliminary calculations (including objections concerning the identification of units eligible for allocations) and will promulgate a notice responding to any such objections no later than August 1, 2016, the deadline for recording the first-round allocations in sources' Allowance Management System accounts. This notice may concern CSAPR-affected units in the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. DATES: Objections to the information referenced in this notice must be received on or before June 27, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via email to [email protected]. Include ``2016 NUSA allocations'' in the email subject line and include your name, title, affiliation, address, phone number, and email address in the body of the email. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this action should be addressed to Robert Miller at (202) 343-9077 or [email protected] or Kenon Smith at (202) 343-9164 or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the CSAPR FIPs, the mechanisms by which initial allocations of emission allowances are determined differ for ``existing'' and ``new'' units. For ``existing'' units--that is, units commencing commercial operation before January 1, 2010--the specific amounts of CSAPR FIP allowance allocations for all compliance years have been established through rulemaking. EPA has announced the availability of spreadsheets showing the CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units in previous notices.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The latest spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units, updated in 2014 to reflect changes to CSAPR's implementation schedule but with allocation amounts unchanged since June 2012, is available at http://www3.epa.gov/crossstaterule/actions.html. See Availability of Data on Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances to Existing Electricity Generating Units, 79 FR 71674 (December 3, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ``New'' units--that is, units commencing commercial operation on or after January 1, 2010--as well as certain older units that would not otherwise obtain FIP allowance allocations do not have pre-established allowance allocations. Instead, the CSAPR FIPs reserve a portion of each state's total annual emissions budget for each CSAPR emissions trading program as a new unit set-aside (NUSA) \2\ and establish an annual process for allocating NUSA allowances to eligible units. States with Indian country within their borders have separate Indian country NUSAs. The annual process for allocating allowances from the NUSAs and Indian country NUSAs to eligible units is set forth in the CSAPR regulations at 40 CFR 97.411(b) and 97.412 (NOX Annual Trading Program), 97.511(b) and 97.512 (NOX Ozone Season Trading Program), 97.611(b) and 97.612 (SO2 Group 1 Trading Program), and 97.711(b) and 97.712 (SO2 Group 2 Trading Program). Each NUSA allowance allocation process involves up to two rounds of allocations to new units followed by the allocation to existing units of any allowances not allocated to new units. EPA provides public notice at certain points in the process. This notice concerns preliminary calculations for the first round of NUSA allowance allocations for the 2016 compliance year.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The NUSA amounts range from two percent to eight percent of the respective state budgets. The variation in percentages reflects differences among states in the quantities of emission allowances projected to be required by known new units at the time the budgets were set or amended. \3\ At this time, EPA is not aware of any unit eligible for a first-round allocation from any Indian country NUSA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The units eligible to receive first-round NUSA allocations are defined in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(1), 97.512(a)(1), 97.612(a)(1), and 97.712(a)(1). Generally, eligible units include any CSAPR-affected unit that has not been allocated allowances as an existing unit as well as certain units that have been allocated allowances as existing units but whose allocations have been deducted or not recorded because of corrections or multi-year breaks in operations. EPA notes that a valid allowance allocation may consist of zero allowances; thus, an existing unit specifically allocated zero allowances in the spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units is generally ineligible to receive a NUSA allowance allocation. The quantity of allowances to be allocated through the 2016 NUSA allowance allocation process for each state and emissions trading program is generally the state's 2016 emissions budget less the sum of (1) the total of the 2016 CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units and (2) the amount of the 2016 Indian country NUSA, if any.\4\ [[Page 33637]] The amounts of NUSA allowances may be increased in certain circumstances as set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(2), 97.512(a)(2), 97.612(a)(2), and 97.712(a)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ The quantities of allowances to be allocated through the NUSA allowance allocation process may differ slightly from the NUSA amounts set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.410(a), 97.510(a), 97.610(a), and 97.710(a) because of rounding in the spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The amounts of first-round allocations to eligible units from each NUSA are calculated according to the procedures set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(3)-(7) and (12), 97.512(a)(3)-(7) and (12), 97.612(a)(3)-(7) and (12), and 97.712(a)(3)-(7) and (12). Generally, the procedures call for each eligible unit to receive a first-round 2016 NUSA allocation equal to its 2015 emissions as reported under 40 CFR part 75 unless the total of such allocations to all eligible units would exceed the amount of allowances in the NUSA, in which case the allocations are reduced on a pro-rata basis.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Subsequent allocations of any allowances remaining in any 2016 NUSA after first-round allocations will be addressed in future notices. Any such allocations will be made according to the procedures set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(9), (10) and (12), 97.512(a)(9), (10) and (12), 97.612(a)(9), (10) and (12), and 97.712(a)(9), (10) and (12). Generally, new units that commenced commercial operations in 2015 or 2016 will receive second-round 2016 NUSA allocations sufficient to bring the totals of their first- and second-round allocations up to their 2016 emissions as reported under 40 CFR part 75 unless the total of such second-round allocations for all eligible units would exceed the remaining amount of allowances in the NUSA, in which case the second-round allocations will be reduced on a pro-rata basis. Any allowances remaining in any NUSA after second-round allocations to new units-- along with any allowances remaining in any corresponding Indian country NUSA--will be allocated to the state's existing units in proportion to their respective 2016 CSAPR FIP allocations of non- NUSA allowances. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA notes that an allocation or lack of allocation of allowances to a given EGU does not constitute a determination that CSAPR does or does not apply to the EGU. EPA also notes that allocations are subject to potential correction. The detailed unit-by-unit data and preliminary allowance allocation calculations are set forth in Excel spreadsheets titled ``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_NOX _Annual_1st_Round_Prelim_Data'', ``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_NOX _OS_1st_Round_Prelim_Data'', and ``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_SO2 _1st_Round_Prelim_Data,'' available on EPA's Web site at http://www3.epa.gov/crossstaterule/actions.html. The three spreadsheets show EPA's initial determinations of 2016 NUSA allocations for new units subject to the CSAPR NOX Annual, NOX Ozone Season, and SO2 (Group 1 and Group 2) trading programs, respectively. Each of the spreadsheets contains a separate worksheet for each state covered by that program showing, for each unit identified as eligible for a first-round NUSA allocation, (1) the unit's emissions in the 2015 control period (annual or ozone season as applicable), (2) the maximum first-round 2016 NUSA allowance allocation for which the unit is eligible (typically the unit's emissions in the 2015 control period), (3) various adjustments to the unit's maximum allocation, many of which are necessary only if the NUSA pool is oversubscribed, and (4) the preliminary calculation of the unit's first-round 2016 NUSA allowance allocation. Each state worksheet also contains a summary showing (1) the quantity of allowances initially available in that state's 2016 NUSA, (2) the sum of the first-round 2016 NUSA allowance allocations that will be made to new units in that state, assuming there are no corrections to the data, and (3) the quantity of allowances that would remain in the 2016 NUSA for use in second-round allocations to new units (or ultimately for allocation to existing units), again assuming there are no corrections to the data. Objections should be strictly limited to the data and calculations upon which the NUSA allowance allocations are based and should be emailed to the address identified in ADDRESSES. Objections must include: (1) Precise identification of the specific data and or calculations the commenter believes are inaccurate, (2) new proposed data and or calculations upon which the commenter believes EPA should rely instead to determine allowance allocations, and (3) the reasons why EPA should rely on the commenter's proposed data and or calculations and not the data referenced in this notice. Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b), 97.611(b), and 97.711(b). Dated: May 19, 2016. Reid P. Harvey, Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air and Radiation. [FR Doc. 2016-12485 Filed 5-26-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![33636 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2016 / Proposed Rules
implications and will not impose preliminary calculations (including each CSAPR emissions trading program
substantial direct costs on tribal objections concerning the identification as a new unit set-aside (NUSA) 2 and
governments or preempt tribal law as of units eligible for allocations) and will establish an annual process for
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 promulgate a notice responding to any allocating NUSA allowances to eligible
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). However, such objections no later than August 1, units. States with Indian country within
consistent with EPA policy, the EPA 2016, the deadline for recording the their borders have separate Indian
provided a consultation opportunity to first-round allocations in sources’ country NUSAs. The annual process for
the Spokane Tribe in a letter dated Allowance Management System allocating allowances from the NUSAs
September 11, 2015. The EPA did not accounts. This notice may concern and Indian country NUSAs to eligible
receive a request for consultation. CSAPR-affected units in the following units is set forth in the CSAPR
states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, regulations at 40 CFR 97.411(b) and
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, 97.412 (NOX Annual Trading Program),
Environmental protection, Air Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, 97.511(b) and 97.512 (NOX Ozone
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Season Trading Program), 97.611(b) and
Incorporation by reference, and Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New 97.612 (SO2 Group 1 Trading Program),
Reporting and recordkeeping York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, and 97.711(b) and 97.712 (SO2 Group 2
requirements. Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Trading Program). Each NUSA
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West allowance allocation process involves
Virginia, and Wisconsin. up to two rounds of allocations to new
Dated: May 13, 2016.
DATES: Objections to the information units followed by the allocation to
Dennis J. McLerran, referenced in this notice must be existing units of any allowances not
Regional Administrator, Region 10. received on or before June 27, 2016. allocated to new units. EPA provides
[FR Doc. 2016–12529 Filed 5–26–16; 8:45 am] ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via public notice at certain points in the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P email to CSAPR_NUSA@epa.gov. process. This notice concerns
Include ‘‘2016 NUSA allocations’’ in the preliminary calculations for the first
email subject line and include your round of NUSA allowance allocations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION name, title, affiliation, address, phone for the 2016 compliance year.3
AGENCY number, and email address in the body The units eligible to receive first-
of the email. round NUSA allocations are defined in
40 CFR Part 97
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: §§ 97.412(a)(1), 97.512(a)(1),
[FRL–9947–02–OAR] Questions concerning this action should 97.612(a)(1), and 97.712(a)(1).
be addressed to Robert Miller at (202) Generally, eligible units include any
Availability of Data on Allocations of 343–9077 or miller.robertl@epa.gov or CSAPR-affected unit that has not been
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Kenon Smith at (202) 343–9164 or allocated allowances as an existing unit
Allowances From New Unit Set-Asides smith.kenon@epa.gov. as well as certain units that have been
for the 2016 Compliance Year
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the allocated allowances as existing units
AGENCY: Environmental Protection CSAPR FIPs, the mechanisms by which but whose allocations have been
Agency (EPA). initial allocations of emission deducted or not recorded because of
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of data allowances are determined differ for corrections or multi-year breaks in
availability (NODA). ‘‘existing’’ and ‘‘new’’ units. For operations. EPA notes that a valid
‘‘existing’’ units—that is, units allowance allocation may consist of zero
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection commencing commercial operation allowances; thus, an existing unit
Agency (EPA) is providing notice of the before January 1, 2010—the specific specifically allocated zero allowances in
availability of preliminary calculations amounts of CSAPR FIP allowance the spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP
of emission allowance allocations to allocations for all compliance years allowance allocations to existing units is
certain units under the Cross-State Air have been established through generally ineligible to receive a NUSA
Pollution Rule (CSAPR). Under the rulemaking. EPA has announced the allowance allocation.
CSAPR federal implementation plans availability of spreadsheets showing the The quantity of allowances to be
(FIPs), portions of each covered state’s CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to allocated through the 2016 NUSA
annual emissions budgets for each of the existing units in previous notices.1 allowance allocation process for each
four CSAPR emissions trading programs ‘‘New’’ units—that is, units state and emissions trading program is
are reserved for allocation to electricity commencing commercial operation on generally the state’s 2016 emissions
generating units that commenced or after January 1, 2010—as well as budget less the sum of (1) the total of the
commercial operation on or after certain older units that would not 2016 CSAPR FIP allowance allocations
January 1, 2010 (new units) and certain otherwise obtain FIP allowance to existing units and (2) the amount of
other units not otherwise obtaining allocations do not have pre-established the 2016 Indian country NUSA, if any.4
allowance allocations under the FIPs. allowance allocations. Instead, the
The quantities of allowances allocated CSAPR FIPs reserve a portion of each 2 The NUSA amounts range from two percent to
to eligible units from each new unit set- state’s total annual emissions budget for eight percent of the respective state budgets. The
aside (NUSA) under the FIPs are variation in percentages reflects differences among
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1 The latest spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP allowance states in the quantities of emission allowances
calculated in an annual one- or two- projected to be required by known new units at the
allocations to existing units, updated in 2014 to
round allocation process. EPA has reflect changes to CSAPR’s implementation time the budgets were set or amended.
completed preliminary calculations for schedule but with allocation amounts unchanged 3 At this time, EPA is not aware of any unit
the first round of NUSA allowance since June 2012, is available at http:// eligible for a first-round allocation from any Indian
allocations for the 2016 compliance year www3.epa.gov/crossstaterule/actions.html. See country NUSA.
Availability of Data on Allocations of Cross-State 4 The quantities of allowances to be allocated
and has posted spreadsheets containing Air Pollution Rule Allowances to Existing through the NUSA allowance allocation process
the calculations on EPA’s Web site. EPA Electricity Generating Units, 79 FR 71674 may differ slightly from the NUSA amounts set
will consider timely objections to the (December 3, 2014). forth in §§ 97.410(a), 97.510(a), 97.610(a), and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 May 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM 27MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_33739/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2016 / Proposed Rules 33637
The amounts of NUSA allowances may unit’s emissions in the 2015 control SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime
be increased in certain circumstances as period (annual or ozone season as Commission (Commission) proposes
set forth in §§ 97.412(a)(2), 97.512(a)(2), applicable), (2) the maximum first- amending its current user fees and
97.612(a)(2), and 97.712(a)(2). round 2016 NUSA allowance allocation invites public comment on whether the
The amounts of first-round allocations for which the unit is eligible (typically Commission should amend its user fees.
to eligible units from each NUSA are the unit’s emissions in the 2015 control Specifically, the Commission proposes
calculated according to the procedures period), (3) various adjustments to the increasing fees for: Filing complaints
set forth in §§ 97.412(a)(3)–(7) and (12), unit’s maximum allocation, many of and certain petitions; records searches,
97.512(a)(3)–(7) and (12), 97.612(a)(3)– which are necessary only if the NUSA document copying, and admissions to
(7) and (12), and 97.712(a)(3)–(7) and pool is oversubscribed, and (4) the practice; paper filing of ocean
(12). Generally, the procedures call for preliminary calculation of the unit’s transportation intermediary (OTI)
each eligible unit to receive a first-round first-round 2016 NUSA allowance applications; filing applications for
2016 NUSA allocation equal to its 2015 allocation. special permission; and filing
emissions as reported under 40 CFR part Each state worksheet also contains a agreements.
75 unless the total of such allocations to summary showing (1) the quantity of The Commission also proposes
all eligible units would exceed the allowances initially available in that lowering fees for: Reviewing Freedom of
amount of allowances in the NUSA, in state’s 2016 NUSA, (2) the sum of the Information Act (FOIA) requests;
which case the allocations are reduced first-round 2016 NUSA allowance revising clerical errors on service
on a pro-rata basis.5 allocations that will be made to new contracts; Revising clerical errors on
EPA notes that an allocation or lack units in that state, assuming there are no non-vessel-operating common carrier
of allocation of allowances to a given corrections to the data, and (3) the (NVOCC) service agreements; and
EGU does not constitute a determination quantity of allowances that would Commission services to passenger vessel
that CSAPR does or does not apply to remain in the 2016 NUSA for use in operators (PVOs).
the EGU. EPA also notes that allocations second-round allocations to new units In addition, the Commission proposes
are subject to potential correction. (or ultimately for allocation to existing repealing four existing fees for: Adding
The detailed unit-by-unit data and units), again assuming there are no interested parties to a specific docket
preliminary allowance allocation corrections to the data. mailing list; the Regulated Persons
calculations are set forth in Excel Objections should be strictly limited Index database; database reports on
spreadsheets titled to the data and calculations upon which Effective Carrier Agreements; and filing
‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2016_NOX_Annual_1st the NUSA allowance allocations are petitions for rulemaking. The
_Round_Prelim_Data’’, ‘‘CSAPR_ based and should be emailed to the Commission also proposes adding a new
NUSA_2016_NOX_OS_1st_Round address identified in ADDRESSES. fee for requests for expedited review of
_Prelim_Data’’, and ‘‘CSAPR_ Objections must include: (1) Precise an agreement filing.
NUSA_2016_SO2_1st_Round_Prelim identification of the specific data and or
DATES: Comments are due on or before
_Data,’’ available on EPA’s Web site at calculations the commenter believes are
http://www3.epa.gov/crossstaterule/ inaccurate, (2) new proposed data and June 27, 2016.
actions.html. The three spreadsheets or calculations upon which the ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
show EPA’s initial determinations of commenter believes EPA should rely identified by the docket number in the
2016 NUSA allocations for new units instead to determine allowance heading of this document, by any of the
subject to the CSAPR NOX Annual, NOX allocations, and (3) the reasons why following methods:
Ozone Season, and SO2 (Group 1 and EPA should rely on the commenter’s • Email: secretary@fmc.gov. Include
Group 2) trading programs, respectively. proposed data and or calculations and in the subject line: ‘‘Docket No. 16–06,
Each of the spreadsheets contains a not the data referenced in this notice. Comments on ‘‘Update of User Fees.’’
separate worksheet for each state Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b), Comments should be attached to the
covered by that program showing, for 97.611(b), and 97.711(b). email as a Microsoft Word or text-
each unit identified as eligible for a searchable PDF document. Comments
Dated: May 19, 2016.
first-round NUSA allocation, (1) the containing confidential information
Reid P. Harvey,
should not be submitted by email.
Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office
97.710(a) because of rounding in the spreadsheet of
of Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air and • Mail: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary,
CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units.
5 Subsequent allocations of any allowances Radiation. Federal Maritime Commission, 800
remaining in any 2016 NUSA after first-round [FR Doc. 2016–12485 Filed 5–26–16; 8:45 am]
North Capitol Street NW., Washington,
allocations will be addressed in future notices. Any DC 20573–0001. Phone: (202) 523–5725.
such allocations will be made according to the BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Email: secretary@fmc.gov.
procedures set forth in §§ 97.412(a)(9), (10) and
(12), 97.512(a)(9), (10) and (12), 97.612(a)(9), (10) • Docket: For access to the docket to
and (12), and 97.712(a)(9), (10) and (12). Generally, read background documents or
new units that commenced commercial operations FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION comments received, go to: http://
in 2015 or 2016 will receive second-round 2016 www.fmc.gov/16-06.
NUSA allocations sufficient to bring the totals of 46 CFR Parts 502, 503, 515, 520, 530,
their first- and second-round allocations up to their 535, 540, 550, 555, and 560 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
2016 emissions as reported under 40 CFR part 75 Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, Federal
unless the total of such second-round allocations [Docket No. 16–06] Maritime Commission, 800 North
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
for all eligible units would exceed the remaining
amount of allowances in the NUSA, in which case RIN 3072–AC34
Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC
the second-round allocations will be reduced on a 20573–0001. Phone: (202) 523–5725.
pro-rata basis. Any allowances remaining in any Email: secretary@fmc.gov.
NUSA after second-round allocations to new Update of Existing and Addition of
units—along with any allowances remaining in any New User Fees SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
corresponding Indian country NUSA—will be Commission’s current user fees are
allocated to the state’s existing units in proportion AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.
to their respective 2016 CSAPR FIP allocations of
based on an assessment of fiscal year
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 2004 costs and have not been updated
non-NUSA allowances.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 May 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM 27MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_33739/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-07 15:10:08
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 15:10:08
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule; notice of data availability (NODA). | |
| Dates | Objections to the information referenced in this notice must be received on or before June 27, 2016. | |
| Contact | Questions concerning this action | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 33636 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR